Impact of Limestone Surface Impurities on Quicklime Product Quality

: Quicklime is produced through the thermal processing of limestone in industrial kilns. During quarry operations, fine particulate quarry dust adheres to limestone lump surfaces, increasing the bulk concentration of impurities in limestone products. During thermal processing in a kiln, impurities such as Si, Mg, Al, Fe, and Mn react with Ca, reducing quicklime product quality. Which reactant phases are formed, and the extent to which these result in a reduction in quality, has not been extensively investigated. The present study investigated as-received and manually washed limestone product samples from two operational quarries using elemental compositions and a developed predictive multi-component chemical equilibrium model to obtain global phase diagrams for 1000–1500 ◦ C, corresponding to the high-temperature zone of a lime kiln, identifying phases expected to be formed in quicklime during thermal processing. The results suggest that impurities found on the surface of the lime kiln limestone feed reduce the main quality parameter of the quicklime products, i.e., calcium oxide, CaO (s), content by 0.8–1.5 wt.% for the investigated materials. The results also show that, in addition to the effect of impurities, the quantity of CaO (s) varies greatly with temperature. More impurities result in more variation and a greater need for accurate temperature control of the kiln, where keeping the temperature below approximately 1300 ◦ C, that of Hatrurite formation, is necessary for a product with higher CaO (s).


Introduction
The raw material for quicklime is limestone, an abundant rock that is quarried or mined.Limestone is rich in calcium carbonate CaCO 3 (s), typically occurring as the mineral calcite; this is heated in industrial kilns to temperatures above the carbonate decomposition temperature to produce quicklime, which is rich in calcium oxide CaO (s), according to Reaction 1 as follows: CaCO 3 (s) → CaO (s) + CO 2 (g) The thermal decomposition, or calcination, of calcite has been extensively studied.Ratelimiting processes have been defined [1], and the effects of steam [2], pressure [3], CO 2 partial pressure [4], heating rate [5], and impurities [6][7][8], among other parameters, have been identified.Of the proposed calcination mechanisms, a mechanism involving intermediate "activated lime" CaO*(s), originally proposed by Hyatt et al. in 1958 [9], has received support in more recent studies [4,10].In addition to the calcination process, the thermal behavior of limestone at temperatures below calcination has been studied extensively; see, e.g., [11].The thermal behavior and properties of different quicklimes and of the main component, calcium oxide CaO (s), produced at low temperatures, 650-1000 • C, has also been studied [12][13][14].
To reduce the residence time and increase production capacity, the quicklime temperature in a lime kiln reaches 1100-1450 • C [15,16], far exceeding the calcination temperature of 800-900 • C.After calcination, the quicklime continues to exhibit phase transformations as the temperature in the lime kiln increases, and the final phase composition will depend on the maximum temperature reached.Eventually, the final product quality is also influenced by cooling, post-processing such as crushing and sieving, storage, and transport to the end user.The present paper targets the effect of impurities on the quicklime quality, expressed as the calcium oxide CaO (s) content, between 1000 and 1500 • C, corresponding to the high-temperature zone of the lime kiln.
Few studies have been found on the phase chemistry of quicklime in the hightemperature zone of a lime kiln.Vola et al. considered phase evolution during quicklime production in generic terms [28] and studied the phase composition of different quicklimes produced at 1050 • C, 1150  (s).Earlier studies have focused on the bulk composition of limestone and singular temperatures or cooled laboratory samples.No studies on the influence of impurities adhered to limestone surfaces on quicklime product quality have been found, nor have studies on the evolution of phases in quicklime in the high-temperature zone of a lime kiln been found.Although the chemistry is complex and not fully known, the main interactions of Ca with impurities can be simplified by reactions (2)-( 6) [34][35][36][37] Quicklime is used in many industrial applications, such as steel production and other metallurgical processes, pulp and paper production, and construction and environmental applications [38,39].Quicklime is available in a wide range of product qualities [40][41][42].The main quality parameter and the main price driver is the CaO (s) content.The world production of quicklime is estimated to be 430 Mt per year [43].Although kiln setup and fuel properties influence quicklime quality, the quality is primarily dependent on the properties of the limestone feed [33,44].
Limestone can be classified based on the chemical purity of the rock (see Table 1); limestone of higher purity results in quicklime of higher CaO (s) than quicklime produced from lower-purity limestone under similar production conditions.For high-calcium limestone, all compounds other than CaCO 3 (s) are considered impurities.Impurities that originate in materials deposited simultaneously with CaCO 3 (s) and that are dispersed throughout the formation are classified as homogeneous impurities.Impurities that appear as inclusions or as loosely embedded materials formed during the sedimentation process often occur as layers in the deposit [45] and are classified as heterogeneous impurities.Common impurities are clay and siliceous matter, and the major impurity elements are Si, Al, Fe, and Mg [44,46].The content of minor elements in commercial limestone is usually low (see Table 2).In quicklime production, elements such as Si, Al, Fe, and Mg can also originate from other sources, e.g., fuel ash.Ash-forming elements in fuels have been related to disturbances in kiln operations and reduced CaO (s) content in the product [15,32,33,51].Fuel ashes were not considered in this investigation.
The limestone production process comprises operations such as blasting, hauling, crushing, sieving, washing, and sampling, generating small particulate matter, i.e., quarry dust.The amount of quarry dust generated will depend on several parameters, such as the amount of heterogeneous impurities contained in the deposit, e.g., clay layers; whether blasting, crushing, and hauling is performed in a manner that reduces the amounts of small particulates generated; and whether the limestone processing plant is equipped with encapsulation and suction with filters to capture the dust in a controlled way.Although the quarry dust is enriched with soft materials such as clay, the composition generally corresponds to that of the bulk of the quarry.For a limestone quarry, this means significant quantities of Ca.This fine particulate material can adhere to the surface of limestone pebbles fed to the kiln to such an extent that it affects quicklime production and product quality.The amount of adhered quarry dust on the limestone surfaces will depend, not only on the amount of quarry dust available, but also on wind and other weather conditions.The experience of the lime kiln operator is that, especially in cold and wet weather conditions, the amount of adhered quarry dust can be significant, resulting in a clear response in lime kilns.Typical kiln responses are, e.g., reduced quicklime quality; an increase in buildups in the channel system of the kiln, resulting in a decrease in kiln availability; and increased dust load on kiln filters, forcing a reduction in kiln production.The aim of the present study was to generate new knowledge on the impact of impurities that are attached to limestone pebbles on the product quality of quicklime, defined here as calcium oxide and designated CaO (s).

Materials and Methods
Limestone samples-A and B-originating from two different northern European quarries were used in this study.Limestone A belongs to the Boda group in central Sweden.The limestone is of Upper Ordovician age, shaped by a meteor during the subsequent Devonian period just over 380 million years ago, and consists of Upper Katian deeper-water carbonate mud-mounds bodie.These bodies overlay lower-to-middle Hirnantian-bedded limestone strata.The limestone is fine-to medium-grained and has a micritic structure.Limestone B belongs to the Slite group on Gotland, Sweden.The Silurian surface bedrock on Gotland spans approximately 10 million years (428-418 million years ago).The bedrock around the deposit consists of a sequence of up to 40 m thick limestone and reef limestone.
Beneath the limestone layers, there are deposits dominated by marl and marlstone with flank deposits.
In Swedish limestone quarries and lime kilns, the influence of wet and cold winter conditions is clearly noticeable and manifests as an increased amount of adhered quarry dust on the limestone products, even if the limestone is recently blasted, such as in this study.Two samples of approximately 15 kg each of lime kiln feed limestone pebbles of the fraction 40-90 mm were collected during the winter period.The samples represent the momentary conditions in the quarry.A washing protocol was undertaken, wherein material on the surface of the limestone products was manually removed by brushing in water, after which, the washed lumps of limestone were removed from the washing water and dried at 105 • C. The washing residue was separated through sedimentation, decanting, and drying at 105 • C.
The elemental compositions of the samples were determined for both as-received and washed conditions.A Panalytical Axios mAX WDXRF X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer and a Leco CS744 IR carbon and sulfur analyzer (IR-C/S) (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, USA) were used to determine the elemental compositions.Chlorine content was not analyzed in the present study but was estimated based on long-term data from the quarries.Loss on ignition (LOI) was determined by weighing before and after heating to 1000 • C in a laboratory muffle furnace.In addition, the elemental composition of the washing residue was characterized to assess whether it was likely that the surface materials originated in the quarries.The assessment was based mainly on the Ca concentration of the washing residue.
A predictive multi-component chemical equilibrium model was built based on commercially available databases and software and published thermodynamic data.The equilibrium model is based on the minimization of Gibbs free energy to determine the stable phases of the system.The equilibrium condition implies that kinetics is not considered; further, the model assumes that all elements have access to each other.Despite the limitations mentioned above, it has been proven to be a useful tool to predict and interpret phase systems of high temperatures.The model was used to obtain global phase diagrams of the high-order system in question, calculated as a function of temperature in the range 1000-1500 • C, corresponding to the high-temperature zone of the lime kiln.From the global phase diagrams, phase diagrams for Ca compounds were extracted.The diagrams for Ca compounds were utilized to analyze the impact of the impurities on limestone surfaces on the quicklime product quality.The model input was the elemental composition of samples, in both as-received and washed conditions, and comprised 15 elements: Al, C, Ca, Cl, Fe, H, K, Mg, Mn, Na, O, P, S, Si, and Ti.All calculations were made at 1 bar and in an atmosphere of 50 mol-% CO 2 and 50 mol-% O 2 .Thermodynamic data from Lindberg et al. and Bale et al. [52,53] were used.The FactSage 7.3 software and FACTPS and FToxid databases, comprising pure solids, an oxide melt, and solid solutions for wollastonite (CaSiO 3 (ss)), bredigite (Ca 7 Mg(SiO 4 ) 4 (ss)), olivine (Ca 2 SiO 4 (ss)), melilite (Ca 2 (Mg,Fe,Al)(Al,Fe,Si) 2 O 7 ), calcium ferrite (Ca 2 (Fe,Al) 2 O 5 (ss) notation: C2AF (ss)), belite (Ca 2 SiO 4 (ss) notation: C2S (ss)), calcium aluminate (Ca 3 (Al,Fe) 2 O 6 notation: C3A (ss)), and feldspar, were used.For the salt mixture system of Na-K-Ca-Cl-S-C-O, the database from Lindberg et al. was utilized.

Results
The elemental compositions, expressed as oxides, of the samples derived from limestone A and B, as determined by XRF, IR-C/S analysis, and LOI at 1000 • C, are presented in Table 3.The elemental compositions for as-received and washed materials were used as input to the predictive multi-component chemical equilibrium model to determine the global phase diagrams of the resulting quicklime.From the global phase diagrams, phase diagrams for Ca compounds were extracted in the quicklime production temperature range of 1000-1500 • C. The resulting phase diagrams for Ca compounds are shown in Figures 1-4.
The elemental compositions, expressed as oxides, of the samples derived from limestone A and B, as determined by XRF, IR-C/S analysis, and LOI at 1000 °C, are presented in Table 3.The elemental compositions for as-received and washed materials were used as input to the predictive multi-component chemical equilibrium model to determine the global phase diagrams of the resulting quicklime.From the global phase diagrams, phase diagrams for Ca compounds were extracted in the quicklime production temperature range of 1000-1500 °C.The resulting phase diagrams for Ca compounds are shown in Figures 1-4.That in the temperature range 1132-1298 °C, the phase composition changed significantly when α'-C2S formed.The composition can be described as follows: • 90.1-92.7 wt.% of CaO (s).• 3.9-5.9wt.% of alpha′ belite, Ca2SiO4, designated α′-C2S (s).• Traces of CaO (l), Ca dissolved into the oxide melt.

Discussion
Quicklime has many quality parameters, such as reactivity [54], available lime, and residual CO 2 content [55]; however, in the present study, the chemical quality of quicklime is discussed in terms of the amount of calcium oxide, CaO (s), in the product, as described by the phase diagram for Ca phases.
The elemental compositions of the limestone samples, shown in Table 3, facilitated their chemical classification according to Table 1.Limestone A is of medium purity, with CaO content of 54.06 wt.% in the as-received condition and 54.14 wt.% after washing.The analyzed surface particles in the washing residue consisted mainly of Ca but showed high concentrations of impurities, mainly of Mg, Si, Al, and Fe.The surface impurities decreased the CaO content in the bulk feed by 0.08 wt.%.Limestone B is a medium-to high-purity limestone: the CaO content was 54.06 wt.% as-received and 54.43 wt.% after washing.The washing residue consisted mainly of Ca.The main impurities found in the washing residue were Si, Mg, Al, and Fe.Removing the surface impurities through washing increased the CaO content by 0.37 wt.%.For both A and B and the as-received and washed conditions, the impurities in the samples were consistent with typical levels for commercial limestone (see Table 2).
The surface particles, I.e., the washing residues, had a similar distribution of major elements to the washed rock, i.e., dominated by Ca and with a relatively high LOI, consistent with carbonate rock.It can thus be assumed that the surface particles originated from within the quarry areas and not from outside the quarry.
The predictive multi-component chemical equilibrium model was used to obtain phase diagrams of Ca compounds for the quicklime at kiln temperatures.The results are shown in Figures 1-4.
Although the levels of impurities in the surface layers were high, clearly exceeding that of the washed rock, the Ca content of the as-received limestone samples was only marginally reduced (see Table 3).However, the results show that due to the interaction between Ca and the impurities, mainly Si, Al, and Fe as described by Reactions ( 2)-( 6), and Mg and Mn by an unknown reaction mechanism, the CaO (s) content of the quicklime was significantly reduced.To highlight this effect and promote comparison between the as-received and washed samples, Figures 5 and 6 show the quality parameter of interest, CaO (s), extracted from phase diagrams of Ca compounds, seen in Figures 1-4, as a function of temperature.For all samples, CaO (s) reached a maximum at a temperature range of 1000-1100 • C. The minimum CaO (s) content was obtained near to the temperature of Hatrurite formation, at 1300 • C. At temperatures exceeding 1300 • C, the phase diagrams, seen in Figures 1-4, suggest that the equilibrium gradually shifted toward less Hatrurite and increased amounts of Ca being dissolved into the melt and an increased level of CaO (s).The stability of Hatrurite will depend on the global equilibrium, and it is reported to be 1799 • C in the CaO-SiO 2 system used in the calculations [53].and 91.9 wt.%, with the surface impurities reducing CaO (s) by 1.2-1.5 wt.%.For Limestone B in the as-received condition, CaO (s) varied between 90.3 and 92.2 wt.%, and in the washed condition, it was between 91.4 and 93.0 wt.%, with the surface impurities reducing CaO (s) by 0.8-1.1 wt.%.The results show that from a quicklime quality perspective, with respect to CaO (s), limestone should be processed below a maximum temperature of 1300 °C, which likely corresponds well to many current lime kiln design parameters.Above 1300 °C, the quality and 91.9 wt.%, with the surface impurities reducing CaO (s) by 1.2-1.5 wt.%.For Limestone B in the as-received condition, CaO (s) varied between 90.3 and 92.2 wt.%, and in the washed condition, it was between 91.4 and 93.0 wt.%, with the surface impurities reducing CaO (s) by 0.8-1.1 wt.%.The results show that from a quicklime quality perspective, with respect to CaO (s), limestone should be processed below a maximum temperature of 1300 °C, which likely corresponds well to many current lime kiln design parameters.Above 1300 °C, the quality The results show that for Limestone A in an as-received condition, the CaO (s) content varied between 88.2 and 90.7 wt.%, and in a washed condition, it was between 89.7 and 91.9 wt.%, with the surface impurities reducing CaO (s) by 1.2-1.5 wt.%.For Limestone B in the as-received condition, CaO (s) varied between 90.3 and 92.2 wt.%, and in the washed condition, it was between 91.4 and 93.0 wt.%, with the surface impurities reducing CaO (s) by 0.8-1.1 wt.%.
The results show that from a quicklime quality perspective, with respect to CaO (s), limestone should be processed below a maximum temperature of 1300 • C, which likely corresponds well to many current lime kiln design parameters.Above 1300 • C, the quality is reduced due to Hatrurite formation.The results also show that even if the surface impurities only marginally reduce the purity of the limestone, the impurities will reduce CaO (s) in the quicklime by the formation of Ca compounds other than CaO (s), mainly Bredigite, α ′ -C2S, C3A, and Hatrurite.For the investigated samples, the CaO (s) was reduced by 0.8-1.5 wt.%, which is significant from a quicklime product quality perspective.A limitation of the methods applied in this study is that all impurities were allowed to react with the bulk limestone and reach equilibrium conditions.In actual kiln operations, all reactions will not reach equilibrium, and since the quarry dust is located on the surface of the limestone pebbles, some of it is expected to be released, e.g., due to pebble-pebble abrasion in the kiln, and transported by the kiln gas flows.
The results could be assessed in relation to further investigations of the quarries, e.g., locating the main sources of quarry particulates with high concentrations of impurities, e.g., dust, mud, or clay, and undertaking actions to reduce limestone feed product exposure to impurities, e.g., by the encapsulation of equipment, or to remove adhered impurities, e.g., by washing.This could be combined with a follow-up analysis of the quantities and compositions of surface particulates for the purpose of verification.

Conclusions
Limestone quarry dust generally consists of fine particulates of limestone, mud, and clay, high in impurities.If adhered to limestone lump surfaces, the bulk concentration of impurities in limestone product is increased.The impacts of impurities adhered to the surface of two different limestone samples were investigated.The elemental compositions of the samples were determined through XRF and IR-C/S analysis.A predictive global multi-component chemical equilibrium model was designed based on the elemental composition of the samples.The temperature range of 1000-1500 • C was used, corresponding to the high-temperature zone of the lime kiln.From the global phase diagrams, phase diagrams for Ca compounds were extracted.The Ca compound phase diagrams show that the combined effects of impurities and kiln temperature on the main quicklime quality parameter, CaO (s), are significant.Since the price of a quicklime product is mainly dependent on the CaO (s) content, a washing protocol has the potential to increase the value of the product.The results create an opening for process optimization in the form of, e.g., limestone washing procedures and temperature control in kilns based on limestone compositional data.Based on the results, the following can be concluded:

•
For both limestone samples, there was an accumulation of impurities on the surface.This material could be separated through washing.The washed rock samples had fewer impurities than the as-received samples and the washing residue.The composition of the washing residue indicated that the fine adhered materials likely originated from within the quarry.

•
Surface particles affected the quality of quicklime products; the developed predictive multi-component chemical equilibrium model suggested a significant reduction in the main quality parameter of the quicklime, CaO (s), of 0.8-1.5 wt.% for the investigated materials, due mainly to the formation of Bredigite, α ′ -C2S, C3A, and Hatrurite.• The amount of CaO (s) varied greatly with temperature.More impurities resulted in more variation and a greater need for accurate temperature control of the kiln, where keeping the temperature below approximately 1300 • C, that of Hatrurite formation, allows for a product with higher CaO (s) content.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Phase diagram for calcium compounds in quicklime product of Limestone A in as-received condition.Extracted from the global phase diagram calculated from the elemental composition of the sample.CaO (l) was present in the oxide melt, and temperature (1000-1500 • C) was plotted against the weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Phase diagram for calcium compounds in quicklime product of Limestone A in as-received condition.Extracted from the global phase diagram calculated from the elemental composition of the sample.CaO (l) was present in the oxide melt, and temperature (1000-1500 °C) was plotted against the weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Phase diagram for calcium compounds in quicklime product of Limestone A in washed condition.Extracted from the global phase diagram calculated from the elemental composition of the sample.CaO (l) was present in the oxide melt, and temperature (1000-1500 °C) was plotted against the weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Phase diagram for calcium compounds in quicklime product of Limestone B in as-received condition.Extracted from the global phase diagram calculated from the elemental composition of the sample.CaO (l) was present in the oxide melt, and temperature (1000-1500 °C) was plotted against the weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Phase diagram for calcium compounds in quicklime product of Limestone A in washed condition.Extracted from the global phase diagram calculated from the elemental composition of the sample.CaO (l) was present in the oxide melt, and temperature (1000-1500 • C) was plotted against the weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Phase diagram for calcium compounds in quicklime product of Limestone A in as-received condition.Extracted from the global phase diagram calculated from the elemental composition of the sample.CaO (l) was present in the oxide melt, and temperature (1000-1500 °C) was plotted against the weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Phase diagram for calcium compounds in quicklime product of Limestone A in washed condition.Extracted from the global phase diagram calculated from the elemental composition of the sample.CaO (l) was present in the oxide melt, and temperature (1000-1500 °C) was plotted against the weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Phase diagram for calcium compounds in quicklime product of Limestone B in as-received condition.Extracted from the global phase diagram calculated from the elemental composition of the sample.CaO (l) was present in the oxide melt, and temperature (1000-1500 °C) was plotted against the weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Phase diagram for calcium compounds in quicklime product of Limestone B in as-received condition.Extracted from the global phase diagram calculated from the elemental composition of the sample.CaO (l) was present in the oxide melt, and temperature (1000-1500 • C) was plotted against the weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Phase diagram for calcium compounds in quicklime product of Limestone B in washed condition.Extracted from the global phase diagram calculated from the elemental composition of the sample.CaO (l) was present in the oxide melt, and temperature (1000-1500 °C) was plotted against the weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Phase diagram for calcium compounds in quicklime product of Limestone B in washed condition.Extracted from the global phase diagram calculated from the elemental composition of the sample.CaO (l) was present in the oxide melt, and temperature (1000-1500 • C) was plotted against the weight percent of condensed phases.

Figures 1 -
Figures 1-4 describe the phase evolution of Ca compounds expressed as the weight percent of condensed phases.The figures show the following:That the phase evolution of Ca at 1000-1131 • C can be described as the formation of the following:

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Limestone A, as-received and washed: CaO (s) in quicklime product, extracted from phase diagrams of Ca compounds seen in Figures 1 and 2, in weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Limestone B, as-received and washed: predicted CaO(s) in quicklime product, extracted from phase diagrams of Ca compounds seen in Figures 3 and 4, in weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Limestone A, as-received and washed: CaO (s) in quicklime product, extracted from phase diagrams of Ca compounds seen Figures 1 and 2, in weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Limestone A, as-received and washed: CaO (s) in quicklime product, extracted from phase diagrams of Ca compounds seen in Figures 1 and 2, in weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Limestone B, as-received and washed: predicted CaO(s) in quicklime product, extracted from phase diagrams of Ca compounds seen in Figures 3 and 4, in weight percent of condensed phases.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Limestone B, as-received and washed: predicted CaO(s) in quicklime product, extracted from phase diagrams of Ca compounds seen in Figures 3 and 4, in weight percent of condensed phases.

Table 3 .
Analysis results obtained for Limestone A and B, in wt.%, as determined by XRF and IR-C/S analysis, and loss on ignition at 1000 • C. Expressed as oxides.* Cl content was estimated based on long-term quarry data.

Table 3 .
Analysis results obtained for Limestone A and B, in wt.%, as determined by XRF and IR-C/S analysis, and loss on ignition at 1000 °C.Expressed as oxides.* Cl content was estimated based on long-term quarry data.