Pd,Hg-Rich Gold and Compounds of the Au-Pd-Hg System at the Itchayvayam Maﬁc-Ultramaﬁc Complex (Kamchatka, Russia) and Other Localities

: The unique minerals of the Au-Pd-Hg system in gold grains from heavy concentrates of the Itchayvayam placers and watercourses draining and ore samples of the Barany outcrop at the Itchayvayam maﬁc–ultramaﬁc complex (Kamchatka, Russia) were investigated. Gold grains from wa-tercourses draining and heavy concentrates of the Itchayvayam placers contain substitution structures formed by Pd,Hg-rich low-ﬁneness gold (Au 0.59–0.52 Pd 0.24–0.25 Hg 0.17–0.23 , 580‰–660‰) and Pd,Hg-poor high-ﬁneness gold (Au 0.94–0.90 Pd 0.02–0.04 Hg 0.03 , 910‰–960‰). Potarite (PdHg) without and with impurities (Au < 7.9, Cu < 3.5, Ag < 1.2 wt.%), Ag-poor high-ﬁneness gold (Au 0.91 Ag 0.09 , 950‰), Ag,Pd,Hg-bearing middle-ﬁneness gold (Au 0.75 Ag 0.08 Pd 0.09 Hg 0.08 —Au 0.88 Ag 0.09 Pd 0.02 Hg 0.01 , 820‰–930‰), and Pd,Hg-rich low-ﬁneness gold with minor contents Ag and Cd (Au 0.51–0.55 Pd 0.25–0.22 Hg 0.21–0.16 Ag 0.03–0.06 Cd 0.01 , ﬁneness 580‰–630‰) were observed as individual microinclusions in the ore samples of the Barany outcrop. XRD and EBSD study results show that the Pd,Hg-rich low-ﬁneness gold is isotypic to gold and has the same structure type, but different cell dimensions. According to data obtained for the Itchayvayam and some deposits and ore occurrences with Pd,Hg-bearing gold, the stable ternary phases and solid solutions of the following compositions in the Au-Pd-Hg system have been identiﬁed: Pd,Hg-poor gold (Au 0.94–0.90 Pd 0.02–0.04 Hg 0.03 ), Pd,Hg-rich gold (Au 0.59–0.52 Pd 0.24–0.25 Hg 0.17–0.23 ), Au-potarite (PdHg 0.62 Au 0.38 —Pd 1.04 Hg 0.96 —Au 0.80 Pd 0.68 Hg 0.52 ), and Au,Hg-bearing palladium (Pd 0.7 Au 0.3 Hg 0.1 ). The genesis of Pd,Hg-rich gold is insufﬁciently studied. We supposed that the meteoric waters or low-temperature hydrotherms rich in Pd and Hg could lead to the replacement Pd,Hg-poor gold by Pd,Hg-rich gold. High concentrations of Pd in Pd,Hg-bearing gold indicate a genetic relationship with maﬁc–ultramaﬁc rocks.

The Itchayvayam complex is elongated latitudinally and on the surface consists of the main body and two satellite intrusions (Barany and Ailiolan), which according to geophysical data, merge at depth to form a single igneous intrusion [37].The Itchayvayam complex consists mainly of anorthite gabbro, wehrlite, clinopyroxenite, and dunite.The Barany and Ailiolan satellite intrusions consist of gabbro, which was intruded by later monzonite and monzodiorite bodies, bears stockwork zones with bornite-chalcopyrite mineralization.Native gold and several Pd and Ag tellurides were reported in these zones [54].
Placer PGM occurrences spatially related to the Itchayvayam complex are located on the floodplains and alluvial terraces of the Kamenistaya and Itchaivayam rivers.Three assemblages of PGM, derived from different parts of a complex present: isoferroplatinum assemblage derived from dunite, native platinum assemblage derived from clinopyroxenite and wehrlite, and Au-Pd-Hg assemblage derived from gabbro of either the main body of Itchayvayam complex or its satellite Barany massif [37].
The Itchayvayam complex is elongated latitudinally and on the surface consists of the main body and two satellite intrusions (Barany and Ailiolan), which according to geophysical data, merge at depth to form a single igneous intrusion [37].The Itchayvayam complex consists mainly of anorthite gabbro, wehrlite, clinopyroxenite, and dunite.The Barany and Ailiolan satellite intrusions consist of gabbro, which was intruded by later monzonite and monzodiorite bodies, bears stockwork zones with bornite-chalcopyrite mineralization.Native gold and several Pd and Ag tellurides were reported in these zones [54].
Placer PGM occurrences spatially related to the Itchayvayam complex are located on the floodplains and alluvial terraces of the Kamenistaya and Itchaivayam rivers.Three assemblages of PGM, derived from different parts of a complex present: isoferroplatinum assemblage derived from dunite, native platinum assemblage derived from clinopyroxenite and wehrlite, and Au-Pd-Hg assemblage derived from gabbro of either the main body of Itchayvayam complex or its satellite Barany massif [37].
Investigations of the Barany occurrence revealed the following inferred resources: 40,000 tons of Cu, 14.5 tons of Ag, 3 tons of Au, and 0.4 tons of Pd.The prospects occurred in 1995-2000 and in 2016.Later, they were terminated because of the unprofitability of mining the relatively small deposit in conditions of remoteness from existing infrastructure facilities and settlements.

Samples and Analytical Methods
Studied samples were collected from alluvial deposits of the Itchayvayam river (61 • 31 17 N 172 • 25 22 E) and lode sulfide veins in monzogabbro of the Barany satellite of the Itchayvayam mafic-ultramafic complex (61 • 32 47 N 172 • 27 13 E).The 10 individual gold grains obtained by flushing the watercourses draining the Barany outcrop and 8 gold grains from the heavy concentrates of the placer alluvial deposits of the Itchayvayam river (see sampling points in Figure 1) were studied.Some of the individual gold grains were embedded in epoxy and polished.The polished gold grains examined with a reflected light microscope Olympus BX51 show heterogeneity, different colors, and textures.Chemical analyses of minerals were conducted at the Analytical Center for Multi-elemental and Isotope Research in the Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy SB RAS in Novosibirsk, using an MIRA 3 LMU electron scanning microscope (Tescan Orsay Holding, Brno, Czech Republic) with the microanalysis system Aztec Energy Xmax-50 (Oxford Instruments Nanoanalysis, Oxford, UK) (analysts Dr. N. Karmanov and M. Khlestov).The composition of native gold and other minerals was studied at the following parameters: accelerating voltage was 20 kV, spectrum recording time was 60 s (total area of spectra > 10 6 counts).The following X-ray lines were selected: Lα for Pd, Ag, and Mα for Au and Hg.Pure metals (Pd, Ag, Au) and HgTe were used as standards.The lower limits of the determined content (in wt.%) were 0.25 for Ag, 0.6 for Au, 0.8 for Hg, and 0.5 for Pd.Error in determining the main components with the contents higher than 10 wt.% did not exceed 1 rel.%, and when the content of components ranged 2%-10%, the error was no higher than 6-8 rel.%.Close to the lower limit of detection, the error was 15-20 rel.%.In some cases, the live time of spectrum acquisition increased to 120 s, the lower limits of determined contents and the random error of the analysis decreased about 1.4 times.To reduce the effect of microrelief of samples on the quality of analysis, data on the primary homogeneous gold were obtained in the scanning mode of individual sections from 10 × 10 to 100 × 100 µm 2 in size.The composition of small gold grains (<10 µm) was determined with a 10 nm point probe, but the size of the generation region of X-ray emission in gold with the electron beam energy 20 kV was 1 µm.Therefore, the data of analysis cannot be considered quantitative for a single phase if its minimum size is less than 2 µm.
Four polished sections of ore samples of gabbro-monzonites from the Itchayvayam mafic-ultramafic complex (Kamchatka) were also studied in detail.The massif is made up of the main body and a small satellite Barany outcrop.The latter is composed completely of gabbroids intruded by dikes and sill-like bodies of gabbros, diorites, monzodiorites, and quartz monzonites.Sites of hydrothermal-metasomatic processing represented by propilitization, actinolization, and pyritization are widespread within the outcrop.The ore mineralization is restricted to the contact of gabbroids and makes up zones of veinedstreaky, stockwork bornite-chalcopyrite mineralization.Ore minerals are represented by the association of sulfides (Figure 2) and noble metals; the main minerals are bornite, chalcopyrite, and chalcocite, and less common minerals are ilmenite, native gold, hessite, naumannite, potarite, and temagamite.The ores also contain cinnabar, acanthite, rutile, titanite, barite, and oxides of rare earth elements.Electron probe microanalyses (EPMA) of four polishing sections of ore samples were performed in the Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (analyst V.M. Chubarov), using the TescanVega-3 electron scanning microscope equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS X-MАX with detection area 80 mm 2 ).Some analyses were duplicated using the Camebаx 244 microprobe equipped with four wavelength-dispersive spectrometers and energy-dispersive spectrometer X-MАX 50.As standards for noble metal minerals, we used the samples of high- Academy of Sciences (analyst V.M. Chubarov), using the TescanVega-3 electron scanning microscope equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS X-MAX with detection area 80 mm 2 ).Some analyses were duplicated using the Camebax 244 microprobe equipped with four wavelength-dispersive spectrometers and energy-dispersive spectrometer X-MAX 50.As standards for noble metal minerals, we used the samples of high-purity 6 metals obtained in the Moscow Institute of 120 Steel and Alloys, which were checked for compliance and composition uniformity.Pure Au, Ag, Ni, Fe, Se, and Sb were used as standards.To determine As, Fe, and S, we used synthetic compounds FeS 2 , FeAsS, and InAs.Similarly, Te, Hg, Sb, Bi, Pb, Cd, and Cu were determined using synthetic compounds CdTe, CuSbS 2 , Bi 2 S 3 , PbS, HgS, and CuFeS 2 .Determination of the elements was conducted using the analytical lines of the X-ray spectrum: Kα for Fe, Cu, Zn, Ni, Mo, V, Ti, Cr, S, Al, Mg, Ca, Mn, Na, Si, Sc, P, F, and O; Lα for Sb, As, Pd, Ag, Se, Te, and Cd; Mα for Au, Hg, and Pb.Analyses were carried out using an accelerating voltage of 20 kV and sample current on the reference standard Ni: 0.7 nA for SEM Vega-3; 20 nA for Camebax 244 electron microprobe.The minimum detection limit connected with the sensitivity of the EPMA analysis is about 0.1 wt.%.
X-ray powder diffraction study of selected samples was performed on a Stoe IPDS-2T diffractometer (MoKα radiation, graphite monochromator) using Gandolfi mode.Twodimensional X-ray patterns were radially integrated with the help of the XArea software package.The results were processed in the Stoe WinXPOW 2.21 and Match 3.5.3.109program packages.Phase analysis was carried out through the PDF-4+ database (PDF-4+-International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD), accessed on 12 April 2022).
The gold grains were also investigated using a Rigaku R-Axis Rapid II (St.Petersburg State University, X-ray diffraction Resource Center) diffractometer equipped with a curved image plate detector and a rotating anode X-ray source with CoKα radiation, scan speed 1139 • /min, step width 0.02 • , 2-theta range 0-140 • .The data were integrated using the software package Osc2Tab/SQRay [55].All X-ray diffraction powder analyses were carried out at room temperature.
EBSD data were acquired in the Geomodel research center of Saint-Petersburg State University using a scanning electron microscope Hitachi S-3400N (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with Oxford NordLys (Oxford Instruments Nanoanalysis, Oxford, UK) Nano electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and EDS X-MAX 20 detectors detector under the following conditions: 30 kV accelerating voltage, 2 nA beam current, 40 ms per point dwell time in mapping mode and 200 ms in spot mode, 2 × 2 binning and simultaneous EDX mapping.All the data were handled automatically using Oxford Channel5 software package based on of Au structure (ICSD 44362).Prior to EBSD mapping the samples were polished by Ar plasma using an Oxford Instruments Ionfab300 etcher, an exposition of 10 min, an angle of 45•, an accelerating voltage of 500 V, a current of 200 mA, and a beam diameter of 10 cm (Nanophotonics Resource Center, Scientific Park, St. Petersburg, Russia).

Mineral Au-Hg-Pd Phases of Gabbro-Monzonites of the Barany Outcrop at Itchayvayam Mafic-ultramafic Complex
The individual gold grains obtained by panning the watercourses draining the Barany outcrop and ore samples of gabbro-monzonites contain the minerals of the Au-Pd-Hg system.Gold grains consist of Pd,Hg-bearing high-fineness and low-fineness gold.The ore samples contain potarite and Pd,Hg,Ag,Cd-bearing gold of different fineness.Optical photos (Figures 3a and 4a) clearly show that gold grains are heterogeneous and differ in color with bright yellow, bluish-grey, and greyish-yellow zones.The greyish-yellow zones are represented by substitution textures consisting of tiny bluish-grey inclusions in a yellow matrix.In the SEM photo (BSE mode) (Figures 3b and 4c), these two phases (yellow and bluish-grey) seem to be light-and dark-grey.
In one of the gold grains, the core contains high-fineness gold, while the peripheral part consists of low-fineness gold with veinlets of high-fineness gold or zones with a substitution structure formed by two Au-Pd-Hg phases (Figure 3a,b).In another gold grain, the core is composed of a substitution structure with an adjacent high-fineness zone, which is replaced by the low-fineness gold in the marginal part (Figure 4a-c).
The gold grain from the heavy concentrates of the Itchayvayam placer contains lowfineness gold replacing high-fineness gold (Figure 7).The composition of low-and highfineness phases in the grains of placer gold from [36,37] and the composition of these phases from gold grains and ore samples received in this study are similar, which is well seen on the ternary diagram Au(Ag,Cu)-Hg-Pd (Figure 8).1-4), 2 and 3-from placer of the Itchayvayam River [36,37].Phases stable in the Au-Hg-Pd system according to experimental and theoretical data: 4-[27,28]; 5- [26].
According to the IMA "50% rule", Pd,Hg-bearing gold should include natural solid solutions of the composition Au 1-x-y Pd x Hg y , where x (at.fraction Pd) + y (at.fraction Hg) ≤ 0.5 at.fraction, consequently the Au-Pd-Hg compounds with high contents of Pd and Hg impurities of composition Au 0.50 Pd 0.25 Hg 0.25 can be called native gold-Pd,Hg-rich gold.
In the samples studied in the present work, the amount of this phase in the grains was 10%-40% by volume.The diffraction patterns obtained from single-crystal imaging of two grains on a Stoe IPDS-2T diffractometer (MoKα radiation, graphite monochromator) using Gandolfi mode show only lines of gold (Figure 9).The study of 18 grains by the more powerful diffractometer R-Axis Rapid II revealed that all 18 patterns correspond to gold; however, 3 of them also contain additional weak reflections (Figure 10).The interpretation of powder XRD data gave several options: (i) strong reflections correspond to gold, while Au-Pd-Hg alloy is poorly crystalline or X-ray amorphous and does not produce reflections (and weak reflections originate from some other phase); (ii) strong reflections correspond to gold, while weak additional reflections correspond to Au-Pd-Hg alloy or (iii) Au-Pd-Hg alloy is isotypic to gold and their reflections overlap.For the unambiguous assignment of powder XRD data, the EBSD studies of Pd-and Hg-rich areas of Au were undertaken.In the samples studied in the present work, the amount of this phase in the grains was 10%-40% by volume.The diffraction patterns obtained from single-crystal imaging of two grains on a Stoe IPDS-2T diffractometer (MoKα radiation, graphite monochromator) using Gandolfi mode show only lines of gold (Figure 9).The study of 18 grains by the more powerful diffractometer R-Axis Rapid II revealed that all 18 patterns correspond to gold; however, 3 of them also contain additional weak reflections (Figure 10).The interpretation of powder XRD data gave several options: (i) strong reflections correspond to gold, while Au-Pd-Hg alloy is poorly crystalline or X-ray amorphous and does not produce reflections (and weak reflections originate from some other phase); (ii) strong reflections correspond to gold, while weak additional reflections correspond to Au-Pd-Hg alloy or (iii) Au-Pd-Hg alloy is isotypic to gold and their reflections overlap.For the unambiguous assignment of powder XRD data, the EBSD studies of Pd-and Hg-rich areas of Au were undertaken.EBSD study of gold grain 1 from the heavy concentrate of the Itchayvayam River placer shows that it consists of multiple chaotically oriented crystallites with sizes 1-80 µm (Figure 11a).Areas with elevated Pd and Hg contents do not show any decrease in diffraction contrast and crystallinity (Figure 11b) and generate diffraction patterns (Figure 11c,d) very similar to native gold.The orientation map suggests that the neighboring areas with different compositions in many cases have the same crystallographic orientations, which proves their matching or similar structures.However, pattern indexing for Au-Hg-Pd areas has generally slightly higher mean angle deviation (MAD) than for native gold (Figure 11e).The latter can be caused by unit cell distortion leading to slightly different Kikuchi bands positions.Misorientations analysis shows a high degree of mechanical distortions (Figure 11f) within the grain specified by high ductility of gold and multiple deformations during fluvial transport.Pd-Hg-containing crystallites show a lesser degree of distortion compared to nearby native gold, which can be a sign of a higher hardness of the phase.Closer inspection of the solid solution area within the sample corresponding to Figure 2a shows no miscibility among Pd,Hg-poor gold and Pd,Hg-rich gold.Elemental mapping depicts the existence of two pronounced phases forming intergrowths (Figure 11g-i).Diffraction contrast maps reveal the fine subgranular structure and depict the boundaries between Pd,Hg-poor gold and Pd,Hg-rich gold (Figure 11j).Local misorientation maps show that mainly all the disorientations within the solid solution are concentrated on the subgrain boundaries while in native gold they are distributed evenly (Figure 11k).Three grains have three different and independent orientations, while within the grains, all subgrains despite the composition oriented preferably (Figure 11l,m).
EBSD studies of the grain 2 (Figure 4) display granular structure (Figure 11a) where Pd,Hgpoor gold Au 0.90 Pd 0.04 Hg 0.05 Ag 0.01 is represented by a single crystal and probably represents the primary host protograin subsequently replaced by Au 0.52 Pd 0.25 Hg 0.23 (Figure 11b).The discrepancy between the maps of the distribution of elements and the maps of orientations, namely, the intersection of boundaries of two types, allows us to propose a mechanism for the formation of a phase enriched in palladium and mercury as a result of substitution without loss of structure and not as a result of the decomposition of the protophase with the release of Au 0.5 Pd 0.25 Hg 0.25 in the form of independent grains.The substitution is also supported by the fact that the enriched phases are formed close to the grain surface and can be considered incomplete rims.
The pattern misfit map shows a slightly higher average MAD for Au 0.52 Pd 0.25 Hg 0.23 , which matches the data described above (Figure 11e) and almost the same values for Au 0.90 Pd 0.04 Hg 0.05 Ag 0.01 (Figure 11c).Both Pd-Hg-rich phase is harder than Pd,Hg-poor gold due to higher misorientation accumulation in gold according to the misorientation map (Figure 11d).Since EBSD show that Pd-and Hg-rich areas do not show any decrease in diffraction contrast and crystallinity and generate diffraction patterns very similar to native gold.
mapping depicts the existence of two pronounced phases forming intergrowths (Figure 11g-i).Diffraction contrast maps reveal the fine subgranular structure and depict the boundaries between Pd,Hg-poor gold and Pd,Hg-rich gold (Figure 11j).Local misorientation maps show that mainly all the disorientations within the solid solution are concentrated on the subgrain boundaries while in native gold they are distributed evenly (Figure 11k).Three grains have three different and independent orientations, while within the grains, all subgrains despite the composition oriented preferably (Figure 11l,m).Based on that, the appearance of extra reflections in the powder XRD pattern has been interpreted as the cell distortion and the change of the unit cell parameters of Au phase due to admixtures of Pd and Hg.The combination of powder XRD and EBSD data allows to conclude that all reflections at the powder XRD pattern correspond to the structure type of gold, thus these phases are isotypic and some changes in the pattern (appearance of weak split reflections) correspond to the different chemical composition of areas within one grain: Pd,Hg-poor gold and Pd,Hg-rich gold.Despite the fact that our data are interpreted as the presence of only cubic phases with the Au structure, a hypothetical decrease in symmetry in this Au-Pd-Hg system seems possible to us; however, the difference in the unit cell parameters can be small and difficult to detect.The observed increase in pattern fitting error may also be a sign of symmetry lowering.
In other words, the reflection split is due to the appearance of three phases with the same structure type, but different cell dimensions.The calculated unit cell parameters from the positions of split reflections with 200 and 400 indexes are a = 4.03, 4.09, and 4.18 Å.

The Composition of Native Gold and Other Phases of the Au-Pd-Hg System
The composition of native gold from the Barany outcrop of the Itchayvayam maficultramafic complex (Kamchatka, Russia) is heterogeneous and unusual.According to EMPA results, it is represented by five varieties:  3).
In ore samples, the native gold III (with only Ag impurity) is intergrown with bornite, cooperate, tenorite in epidote, and prehnite, and in the veinlets with copper sulfate (Cu 4 SO 4 (OH) 2 (H 2 O) 7 ) in epidote, the native gold IV and V (associated with chalcopyrite) are present in epidote (Figure 5).High-and low-fineness gold (I and II) growing together with each other are found in some gold grains (Figures 2 and 3).The absence of minerals in the intergrowth with Pd,Hg-poor gold I and Pd,Hg-rich gold II makes it difficult to explain their genesis.However, these two phases were previously reported to be in association with cooperate (PtS) and malanite (CuPt 2 S 4 ) [37].The Pd,Hg-rich gold forms thin veins in cooperite and precipitates later than other PGE minerals.
Figure 8 shows the compositions of Au-Pd-Hg phases from the Itchayvayam maficultramafic complex (Kamchatka, Russia) obtained in this study and previously published for the Itchayvayam river placers [36,37]: high-fineness gold, low-fineness gold, and Aubearing potarite.The silver is absent or does not exceed 0.38 wt.% in minute analytical points of some gold grains.According to these data, the maximum content of Pd in highfineness gold does not exceed 2.9 wt.%, Hg is less than 6.3 wt.%.Low-fineness gold is characterized by variations in Pd and Hg in the ranges of 9.3-15.1 wt.% and 19.4-27 wt.%.The compositions of Pd,Hg-bearing gold in the samples of gabbro-monzonites from the Itchayvayam mafic-ultramafic massif and Itchayvayam river placers have a similarity that indicates that these rocks are the source of gold in placers.
Potarite from the Itchayvayam river contains impurity of Au up to 7.9 wt.% with Pd and Hg content varying from 33.1 to 35.3 wt.% and 54.9 to 65.3 wt.%, respectively.The intergrowths of Pd,Hg-bearing gold and Au-bearing potarite were not observed in the studied samples from the Itchayvayam.However, dendritic and zoned grains of gold enriched in Pd (up to 10 wt.%), Au-potarite (16 wt.% Pd), or Au-bearing potarite (34 wt.% Pd) from Lower Devonian sediments and minor volcanics in the South Hums district of Devon (southwest England) were reported by Leake et al. (1991) [10].The results of these authors suggest compositional variations in grains with a complex internal growth structure.One such compositional range is around 34 wt.%Pd, 39-60 wt.% Hg and 0-24 wt.% Au (PdHg 0.62 Au 0.38 -Pd 1.04 Hg 0.96 ).Other preferred composition, about 57 wt.% Au, 25 wt.%Hg and 16 wt.%Pd (Au 0.51 Pd 0.27 Hg 0.22 ), occurs in Au-bearing potarite.In addition, a potarite is found as separate sub-grains within an Ag-rich grain overgrowth and as tiny inclusions within inter-sub-granular Ag-enriched films in a Pd-enriched gold.The composition of Pd,Hg-rich low-fineness gold and Au-bearing potarite from the Itchayvayam is close to the composition Au,Pd,Hg-phases from Lower Devonian sediments [10].

The Structure of Phases in the Au-Pd-Hg System
The X-ray diffraction experiments of Au-Pd-Hg natural phases include (i) Au-bearing potarite grain from drainage sediment at Brownstone (South Hums district of Devon, southwest England) that gave potarite pattern with a slightly larger cell size (Leake et al. 1991 [10] reference to Nancorrow, 1989, personal communications); (ii) Pd(Hg,Au) and (Pd,Au) 3 Hg 2 compounds did not diffract using the electron-backscattered diffraction (EBSD) and powder X-ray microdiffraction techniques, indicating that they are poorly crystalline [39].X-ray diffraction also showed that Pd-rich/Ag-rich gold grains belong to gold structure type with decreased/standard unit-cell parameters with a = 4.03-4.06Å and a = 4.07-4.08Å, respectively [61].
There are only three natural phases from Au-Pd-Hg system in the Mindat database, and two of those are alloys.However, neither of them has a defined structure and Pd 0.7 Au 0.3 Hg 0.1 is only published as spot analyses with certain compositions, and (Pd,Au) 3 Hg 2 is reported to give no reasonable EBSD or microX-Ray diffraction (https://www.mindat.org/chesearch.php?inc=Hg%2CAu%2CPd%2C&exc=&class=0&sub=Search+Minerals accessed on 5 August 2022): Pd 0.7 Au 0.3 Hg 0.1 ; (Pd,Au) 3 Hg 2 .No phases containing all three Hg, Au, and Pd are present in either COD or ICSD catalogues.
When studying the Au grains containing Pd-, Hg-rich fragments by EBSD and powder X-ray diffraction it was found that they belong to the structure type of Au (cubic, space group Fm3m, a ~4.07 Å) [67].This is because the observed pattern (Figure 10) corresponds to Au, while extra reflections are produced as the result of the splitting of 200, 220, 311, and 400 reflections (Figure 10).Our interpretation of the data obtained is that all Au-Pd-Hg phases studied in this work are cubic, Fm3m, a = 4.03, 4.09, and 4.18 Å.The splitting of reflections is caused by a change in the unit cell parameters due to the incorporation of Pd (larger than Au) and Hg (smaller than Au) impurities into the structure of Au, i.e., Au/Pd/Hg proportion is responsible for cell metric and therefore reflection splitting.We consider the splitting of reflections (that is, a change in the unit cell parameters) as evidence that the diffraction was obtained precisely for Pd-and Hg-rich Au.
In our work, the most Pd and Hg-enriched fragments reached the composition Au 0.52 Pd 0.25 Hg 0.23 and it is tempting to describe the chemical formula as Au 2 PdHg.Thus, when we had powder XRD data but did not yet have EBSD data, we searched for metal compounds of the stoichiometry of Au 2 PdHg to find structural analogues.The most interesting (from a structural point of view) is the description of atomic ordering for Cu 2 AuPd and Au 2 CuPd compounds with the symmetry decrease to tetragonal (or D 1 4h -4/mmm) as reported based on electron diffraction data [68,69], although it was argued later [70].This is important for our work, since the incorporation of Pd and Hg into the Au structure led to fairly wide variations in the unit cell parameters (4.03, 4.09, and 4.18 Å as reported above).If we assume that for certain chemical systems, the ordering of the chemical elements and the stretching and contraction of the cell in one (or two) directions will indeed occur, then this should lead to a decrease in symmetry from cubic to tetragonal (or lower).Despite the fact that our data are interpreted as the presence of only cubic phases with the Au structure, a hypothetical decrease in symmetry in this Au-Pd-Hg system seems possible to us, however, the difference in the unit cell parameters can be small and difficult to detect.
In general, our structural data are consistent with the (limited) literature, which shows that the phases of the Au-Pd-Hg system do not form separate mineral species but are incorporated in the structure as isomorphic impurities in known structure types.

Deposits with Pd,Hg-Bearing Gold and Genesis of Pd,Hg-Rich Gold
The mechanism of formation of native gold of different chemical compositions is complex and depends on many factors [17,32,44,45].Native gold can form in different environmentsorthomagmatic and hydrothermal systems and exogenous processes [7,32,38,40,60].
The composition of Pd,Hg-bearing gold, associated minerals at some of these deposits and their brief characteristics are represented in Table A2.Pd,Hg-bearing gold has hydrothermal genesis at many deposits (for example, Fe-oxide-Cu Au-Pd Gongo Soco and Au-Pd-Pt Serra Pelada (Brazil)).The Pd-poor gold assemblage possibly formed later than the Au-Pd-Hg alloys.The ore-forming fluids of the Serra Pelada deposit were characterized by a high redox potential and were reduced by the carbonaceous material of metasiltstone, which hosts most of the ore bodies [79].Subsequent removal of As, Sb, and Se from PGM led to the formation of Pd-O-bearing compounds, either by low-temperature hydrothermal or meteoric waters.The hematite-gypsum-Pd,Hg-bearing gold from the Feoxide-Cu-Au deposit Gongo Soco (Brazil) appears to be of low-temperature hydrothermal origin [60].
The Au-Pd ores with Pd,Hg-poor gold and potarite from infiltration U deposits of the "unconformity" type in the South Devon in southwest England [10,41,80] are characterized by the complete absence of sulfides, the presence of selenides and, sometimes, tellurides and arsenides.Au-Pd mineralization is localized in quartz or carbonate veins with hematite and is formed at low temperatures (<100 °C) from oxidized, slightly acidic chloride or soda brines.
The composition of Pd,Hg-bearing gold, associated minerals at some of these deposits and their brief characteristics are represented in Table A2.Pd,Hg-bearing gold has hydrothermal genesis at many deposits (for example, Fe-oxide-Cu Au-Pd Gongo Soco and Au-Pd-Pt Serra Pelada (Brazil)).The Pd-poor gold assemblage possibly formed later than the Au-Pd-Hg alloys.The ore-forming fluids of the Serra Pelada deposit were characterized by a high redox potential and were reduced by the carbonaceous material of metasiltstone, which hosts most of the ore bodies [79].Subsequent removal of As, Sb, and Se from PGM led to the formation of Pd-O-bearing compounds, either by low-temperature hydrothermal or meteoric waters.The hematite-gypsum-Pd,Hg-bearing gold from the Fe-oxide-Cu-Au deposit Gongo Soco (Brazil) appears to be of low-temperature hydrothermal origin [60].
The Au-Pd ores with Pd,Hg-poor gold and potarite from infiltration U deposits of the "unconformity" type in the South Devon in southwest England [10,41,80] are characterized by the complete absence of sulfides, the presence of selenides and, sometimes, tellurides and arsenides.Au-Pd mineralization is localized in quartz or carbonate veins with hematite and is formed at low temperatures (<100 • C) from oxidized, slightly acidic chloride or soda brines.
Pd,Hg-bearing gold is found in sulfide and low-sulfide Cu-Ni-PGE ores of layered ultramafic-mafic intrusions with complex metasomatic and hydrothermal transformations as well as in Fe-oxide Cu-Au(U) deposits (IOCG) or Au-Pd deposits associated with a redox barrier in stratified volcanic-sedimentary basins of different ages and placers associated with layered mafic-ultramafic trap complex and metasediment, volcanic rocks.
Pd-rich gold with minor content of Hg, Cu, and Ag in association with Pt minerals is found in placers of the Mayat and Bolshaya Kuonamka river basins (Anabar massif, northeast of the Siberian Platform) [61].The Pd-rich gold (up to 18 wt.%Pd and minor content of Hg, Cu, Ag, Pt) recovered from the Córrego Bom Sucesso alluvial deposit lacks evidence of long-distance transport and implies a proximal source area adjacent to the alluvial sediments [38].
The compositions of palladian gold from placers and weathering crusts are of higher fineness (770‰-1000‰).Hg is constantly present in exogenous gold, and its content varies in the range of 1-4 wt.%.According to Spiridonov and Yanakieva (2009) [58], almost all gold amalgams found in placers are technogenic formations.This, however, cannot be the case for the studied Itchayvayam complex and related alluvial deposits because they are located in an area extremely remote from any settlements, and no gold exploration has ever been documented there.
The review of literature data showed wider variations in the composition of potarite from PdHg to Au 0.80 Pd 0.68 Hg 0.52 at placer ore occurrences and deposits of weathering crusts (Figure 12b).The highest content of Au in potarite is 46.7 wt.% [35].These data indicate the existence of potarite-based solid solutions.
Pd,Hg-bearing low-fineness gold (580‰-660‰) can be a substitution product of Au-Pd-Hg solid solution or crystallize as a separate phase (Figure 5d).Its presence both in the ore samples of rocks and placer ore occurrences of the Itchayvayam suggests its high stability.It occurs in intergrowth with high-fineness gold (Table 3), or as microinclusions in epidote (Table 4).
The discovered substitution structures containing Au 0.50 Pd 0.25 Hg 0.25 in the intergrowth with Pd,Hg-poor high-fineness gold (940‰-964‰) indicate the exogenous genesis (Figures 3, 4 and 7).Based on the mass balance, the formation of a gold-depleted phase can occur with the introduction of Pd and Hg.However, this phase also forms separate grains in epidote (Figure 5d and Table 3), which contain Ag and Cd impurities.The presence of high-fineness gold (with only Ag impurities) (Table 3, No. 61-63) in intergrowth with copper sulfate indicates oxidative low-temperature deposition conditions in the later stages and the participation of meteoric waters.The metastable thiosulphate ions (S 2 O 3 2− ) can be produced during the oxidation of sulfide minerals, as an intermediate species in the transformation to dissolved sulphate ions and formation of sulphate minerals [81].Under circum-neutral pH oxidizing conditions, groundwaters interact with sulfides and enrich in metastable thiosulphate ions that can transport Au and Ag to be precipitated later by either oxidation or reduction [81,82].The associated Ag is also readily complexed and transported by the thiosulphate ions, so that supergene gold retains a significant Ag content.Silver is more readily dissolved by chloride complexes than gold, and this process can lead to the separation of Au from Ag during supergene processes leaving low-Ag gold [82].
The ore samples of the Itchayvayam mafic-ultramafic complex contain minerals of palladium, mercury, copper, and silver (merenskiite PdTe 2 , mertieite II Pd 8 (Sb,As) 3 , potarite PdHg, temagamite Pd 3 HgTe 3 , bornite Cu 5 FeS 4 , chalcocite Cu 2 S, and covellite CuS, Cdbearing acanthite Ag 2 S; Cd, Se-bearing hessite, Ag 2 Te; naumannite Ag 2 Se).We supposed that the dissolution of minerals of palladium and mercury by meteoric waters or lowtemperature hydrotherms could lead to the formation of the Pd,Hg-rich low-fineness gold on high-fineness gold and Au-bearing potarite, while silver and copper partition to sulfides, tellurides, and selenides.The higher contents of Hg in placer gold in this instance is not a result of anthropogenic activity using Hg in placer mining operations though this does occur elsewhere.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. (a) Optical photo (in reflected light) of gold grain 1, (b) SEM photo (BSE mode) of its left fragment.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. (a) Optical photo (in reflected light) of gold grain 2, (b) SEM photo (BSE mode) of this grain and (c) its left marginal area.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. (a) Optical photo (in reflected light) of gold grain 1, (b) SEM photo (BSE mode) of its left fragment.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. (a) Optical photo (in reflected light) of gold grain 1, (b) SEM photo (BSE mode) of its left fragment.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. (a) Optical photo (in reflected light) of gold grain 2, (b) SEM photo (BSE mode) of this grain and (c) its left marginal area.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. (a) Optical photo (in reflected light) of gold grain 2, (b) SEM photo (BSE mode) of this grain and (c) its left marginal area.

Minerals 2023 , 25 Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Maps of areal distribution of elements (Au, Hg and Pd) in characteristic rays.The gold grain from the heavy concentrate of the Itchayvayam River placer (Kamchatka, Russia).

Figure 7 . 25 Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Maps of areal distribution of elements (Au, Hg and Pd) in characteristic rays.The gold grain from the heavy concentrate of the Itchayvayam River placer (Kamchatka, Russia).

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.The powder X-ray diffraction pattern with Pd,Hg-poor and Pd,Hg-rich gold.See details in the text.Figure 10.The powder X-ray diffraction pattern with Pd,Hg-poor and Pd,Hg-rich gold.See details in the text.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.The powder X-ray diffraction pattern with Pd,Hg-poor and Pd,Hg-rich gold.See details in the text.Figure 10.The powder X-ray diffraction pattern with Pd,Hg-poor and Pd,Hg-rich gold.See details in the text.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.EBSD maps of gold grain 1 (Figure 3): (a) orientation map in Euler coloring scheme; (b) over-imposed diffraction contrast on EDX map; (c,d) comparison of diffraction patterns corresponding to different compositions and same orientation; I EBSD pattern misfit map with mean angle deviation (MAD) chart; (f) local misorientation map with misorientation distribution chart; (g-i) Inset represents magnified elemental maps; (j) diffraction contrast, fine-grained substitution structure; (k) local misorientation shows elevated disorientations at subgrain boundaries within grain; (l) orientation coloring and (m) corresponding orientations distribution inverse pole figure (m) with three circles depicting three distinct grains.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.EBSD maps of gold grain 1 (Figure 3): (a) orientation map in Euler coloring scheme; (b) over-imposed diffraction contrast on EDX map; (c,d) comparison of diffraction patterns corresponding to different compositions and same orientation; (e) EBSD pattern misfit map with mean angle deviation (MAD) chart; (f) local misorientation map with misorientation distribution chart; (g-i) Inset represents magnified elemental maps; (j) diffraction contrast, fine-grained substitution structure; (k) local misorientation shows elevated disorientations at subgrain boundaries within grain; (l) orientation coloring and (m) corresponding orientations distribution inverse pole figure (m) with three circles depicting three distinct grains.

Minerals 2023 ,
13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 18 of 25 settings-terranes and orogenic belts and shields.According to age assessments, the processes of formation of Au-Pd mineralization are in Archean, Proterozoic, Paleozoic, and Mesozoic (Table

( 1 )
No miscibility among Pd,Hg-poor gold and Pd,Hg-rich gold, two Au,Pd,Hg phases with different contents Pd and Hg in gold were established.XRD and EBSD study results show that the low-fineness gold with high contents of Pd and Hg (Au 0.50 Pd 0.25 Hg 0.25 ) is isotypic to gold.This phase has the same structure type, but different cell dimensions.(2) Similarity of the compositions of among Pd,Hg-poor gold and Pd,Hg-rich gold in the ore samples of gabbro-monzonites from the Itchayvayam mafic-ultramafic massifs and placers at Itchayvayam river indicates that these rocks are the source of placers with Au-Pd-Pt-Ag mineralization.(3) Based on natural data, stable phases and solid solutions of the following compositions have been identified in the Au-Pd-Hg ternary system: Pd,Hg-poor gold, Pd,Hg-rich gold (this composition is nearly stoichiometric Au 2 PdHg or Au 0.5 Pd 0.25 Hg 0.25 ), Aupotarite (from Pd(Hg,Au) to (Pd,Au) 3 Hg 2 ), and Au,Hg-rich palladium.The compositional variations and phase relations of Au-Pd-Hg compounds deserve more study.(4) Pd,Hg-bearing gold is a good indicator of the possible genetic connection of Au and sulfide and low-sulfide Cu-Ni-PGE ores of layered mafic-ultramafic intrusions with complex metasomatic and hydrothermal transformations as well as in Fe-oxide Cu-Au(U) deposits (IOCG) or Au-Pd deposits associated with a redox barrier in stratified volcanic-sedimentary basins of different ages and placers associated with layered mafic-ultramafic trap complex and metasediment, volcanic rocks.Pd,Hg-rich lowfineness gold is less common than Pd,Hg-poor high-fineness gold.Meteoric waters or low-temperature hydrotherms rich in Pd and Hg could lead to the replacement of high-fineness gold by Pd,Hg-rich low-fineness gold.

Table 1 .
The composition of heterogeneous gold grains consisting of two phases-Pd,Hg-poor highfineness and Pd,Hg-rich low-fineness gold (in wt.%, formula, N Au ).The individual 5 gold grains obtained by panning the watercourses draining the Barany outcrop.
Note: Analyses were conducted at the Analytical Center for Multi-elemental and Isotope Research in the Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy SB RAS (Novosibirsk) (analysts Dr. N. Karmanov and M. Khlestov)."-" below detection limits.* The fineness of native gold is calculated by equation (1000 × Au/(Au + Me1 + Me2 + and so on), where Au, Ag, Cu, Hg, and Pd as wt.%.

Table 2 .
Composition of Ag,Pd,Hg-bearing gold (in wt.%, fineness ‰, formula) and minerals in association with it in polished ore samples of gabbro-monzonites from Barany outcrop of the Itchayvayam mafic-ultramafic complex (East Kamchatka).
Note: Analyses were conducted in the Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (analyst V.M. Chubarov)."-" below detection limits.

Table 3 .
Composition Pd 0.24 Hg 0.19 Ag 0.02 Cd 0.01 of Ag,Pd,Hg,Cd-bearing low-fineness gold (in wt.%, fineness ‰, formula) with chalcopyrite in epidote in polished ore samples of gabbro-monzonites from Barany outcrop of the Itchayvayam mafic-ultramafic complex (Kamchatka, Russia).Note: Analyses were conducted in the Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (analyst V.M. Chubarov).

Table 2 .
Composition of Ag,Pd,Hg-bearing gold (in wt.%, fineness ‰, formula) and minerals in association with it in polished ore samples of gabbro-monzonites from Barany outcrop of the Itchayvayam mafic-ultramafic complex (East Kamchatka).Note: Analyses were conducted in the Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (analyst V.M. Chubarov)."-" below detection limits. ).
Note: Analyses were conducted in the Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (analyst V.M. Chubarov).

Table 4 .
Composition of potarite (in wt.%, formula) and minerals in association with it in polished ore samples from the Barany outcrop of the Itchayvayam mafic-ultramafic complex (Kamchatka, Russia).

Table A2 .
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, G.P.; methodology, G.P.; formal analysis, T.B., A.K. and P.Z.; investigation, T.B., V.S. and E.Z.; data curation, T.B., A.K. and P.Z.; writing-original draft preparation, G.P., A.K., E.Z., V.S. and Y.S.; writing-review and editing, G.P., A.K., V.S. and E.Z.; visualization, P.Z., V.S., E.Z. and Y.S.; supervision, G.P.; project administration, G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.This research was financially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project No. 20-05-00393) and within the framework of the state assignment of Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia) (No. 122041400237-8).The work of researchers from the Institute of Volcanology and Seismology has been carried out within the state assignment of Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation theme No. AAAA-A0282-2019-0004.The technical support of XRD Research Center and GEOMODEL Research Center of Saint Petersburg State University (SPbU) through the President of Russian Federation Grant Nsh-1462.2022.1.5 is acknowledged.Cont. Funding: