Proterozoic Deep Carbon—Characterisation, Origin and the Role of Fluids during High-Grade Metamorphism of Graphite (Lofoten–Vesterålen Complex, Norway)

: Graphite formation in the deep crust during granulite facies metamorphism is documented in the Proterozoic gneisses of the Lofoten–Vesterålen Complex, northern Norway. Graphite schist is hosted in banded gneisses dominated by orthopyroxene-bearing quartzofeldspathic gneiss, including marble, calcsilicate rocks and amphibolite. The schist has major graphite (<modality 39%), quartz, plagioclase, pyroxenes, biotite (Mg# = 0.67–0.91; Ti < 0.66 a.p.f.u.) and K-feldspar/perthite. Pyroxene is orthopyroxene (En 69–74 ) and/or clinopyroxene (En 33–53 Fs 1–14 Wo 44–53 ); graphite occurs in assemblage with metamorphic orthopyroxene. Phase diagram modelling (plagioclase + orthopyroxene (Mg#-ratio = 0.74) + biotite + quartz + rutile + ilmenite + graphite-assemblage) constrains pressure-temperature conditions of 810–835 ◦ C and 0.73–0.77 GPa; Zr-in-rutile thermometry 726–854 ◦ C. COH ﬂuids stabilise graphite and orthopyroxene; the high Mg#-ratio of biotite and pyroxenes, and apatite Cl < 2 a.p.f.u., indicate the importance of ﬂuids during metamorphism. Stable isotopic δ 13 C graphite in the graphite schist is − 38 to − 17‰; δ 13 C calcite of marbles +3‰ to +10‰. Samples with both graphite and calcite present give lighter values for δ 13 C calcite = − 8.7‰ to − 9.5‰ and heavier values for δ 13 C graphite = − 11.5‰ to − 8.9‰. δ 18 O calcite for marble shows lighter values, ranging from − 15.4‰ to − 7.5‰. We interpret the graphite origin as organic carbon accumulated in sediments, while isotopic exchange between graphite and calcite reﬂects metamorphic and hydrothermal re-equilibration.

Graphite, which shows a "flake" or a high-ordered structure in metamorphic rocks, is usually described in arenites and metapelites.Touret [18] and Newton et al. [20] argued that a massive CO 2 flux through the lower crust is required for the formation of anhydrous orthopyroxene-bearing granulite formation.Lamb and Valley [21] pointed out the importance of f O 2 buffering by the rock, stating that f O 2 estimates in many terranes are so low Minerals 2023, 13, 1279 2 of 20 that graphite should precipitate.However, the lack of graphite observations in orthopyroxene granulites has led to a continuing discussion.The relevance of the CO 2 -flushing process for granulitisation and graphite precipitation has been discussed from a plate tectonic perspective (e.g., [22][23][24]).Meanwhile, the presence and importance of graphite [6,24] and its deposition during volatile processes [3,4,25] have been debated.Case et al. [2] described the metamorphic effect on the formation of graphite deposits.Stable C isotopes of graphite have been used to investigate the carbon origin of graphite formation [26][27][28].Viewed against this background, our documentation of graphite coexisting with orthopyroxene is relevant for the long-term discussion of the formation of graphite in granulite.
In this study, we use field data, drill core logging, petrography, mineral chemistry, petrology and stable C isotopes to document graphite formation and reworking in the Proterozoic orthopyroxene-bearing granulite facies gneisses of Lofoten-Vesterålen Complex in northern Norway (Figure 1).From the stable C isotopes, we interpret the graphite origin to be the organic carbon accumulated in sediments related to the Early Proterozoic global Lomagundi-Jatuli isotopic excursion.From the petrography and mineral chemistry, we establish the reaction equations, producing and consuming fluids stabilising graphite with orthopyroxene.Graphite P-T stability under granulite facies conditions is calculated using the thermometers Zr-in-rutile, the graphite-calcite isotopic ∆ 13 C-ratio and pseudosection modelling.The results are used to discuss the origin of deep Proterozoic carbon, the petrogenetic processes of graphite re-equilibration in granulite and the role of fluids.
orthopyroxene-bearing granulite formation.Lamb and Valley [21] pointed out the importance of fO2 buffering by the rock, stating that fO2 estimates in many terranes are so low that graphite should precipitate.However, the lack of graphite observations in orthopyroxene granulites has led to a continuing discussion.The relevance of the CO2-flushing process for granulitisation and graphite precipitation has been discussed from a plate tectonic perspective (e.g., [22][23][24]).Meanwhile, the presence and importance of graphite [6,24] and its deposition during volatile processes [3,4,25] have been debated.Case et al. [2] described the metamorphic effect on the formation of graphite deposits.Stable C isotopes of graphite have been used to investigate the carbon origin of graphite formation [26][27][28].Viewed against this background, our documentation of graphite coexisting with orthopyroxene is relevant for the long-term discussion of the formation of graphite in granulite.
In this study, we use field data, drill core logging, petrography, mineral chemistry, petrology and stable C isotopes to document graphite formation and reworking in the Proterozoic orthopyroxene-bearing granulite facies gneisses of Lofoten-Vesterålen Complex in northern Norway (Figure 1).From the stable C isotopes, we interpret the graphite origin to be the organic carbon accumulated in sediments related to the Early Proterozoic global Lomagundi-Jatuli isotopic excursion.From the petrography and mineral chemistry, we establish the reaction equations, producing and consuming fluids stabilising graphite with orthopyroxene.Graphite P-T stability under granulite facies conditions is calculated using the thermometers Zr-in-rutile, the graphite-calcite isotopic Δ 13 C-ratio and pseudosection modelling.The results are used to discuss the origin of deep Proterozoic carbon, the petrogenetic processes of graphite re-equilibration in granulite and the role of fluids.
Graphite was first reported in Vesterålen by Keilhau [36], and deposits were mined in 1899-1914 and 1949-1960.Modern investigations of the graphite deposits in the area are summarised by Gautneb and Tveten [13] and Gautneb et al. [15,16].Baker and Fallick [37,38] investigated stable isotopes of marble and associated graphite connecting the signatures to a metamorphic fluid influx while Palosaari, Latonen, Smått, Blomqvist and Eklund [14] studied the quality of the graphite by using XRD and Raman spectroscopy.
From 2013 to 2019, the graphite-bearing provinces of northern Norway were explored for new graphite deposits with economical potential.The work found inferred aggregated graphite resources of 241 Mt ore with an average graphite content of 11.6% [15,16].

Petrological Investigations
Geological field investigation, extensive sampling, drill core logging and the definition of graphite content, quality and resource estimation were reviewed by Rønning et al. [39] and Gautneb et al. [15,16].To understand the petrological processes causing the graphite deposition, a selected sample set (Supplementary Table S1) was investigated for this study.
The polished thin sections were studied using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a LEO 1450 VP instrument situated at the Geological Survey of Norway (NGU).Semi-quantitative X-ray mineral identification was carried out using an energy-dispersive spectrometer mounted on the SEM.
Mineral chemistry (Tables S2-S8), used for petrological interpretations and modelling, was analysed using a Cameca SX100 electron microprobe equipped with 5 wavelengthdispersive spectrometers (WDS) at the Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo.The accelerating voltage was 15 kV, the beam current was 15 nA and the counting time at the peak was 10 s.A focused electron beam was used for pyroxene, scapolite and garnet, and a beam diameter of 5 to 10 µm for plagioclase, biotite and apatite.The calibration was performed using a selection of synthetic and natural minerals and oxides.The matrix corrections were carried out by the PAP program [40].Zr-in-rutile (Table 1) was analysed with an accelerating voltage of 20 kV, a beam current of 100 nA, a beam diameter of 2 µm and a counting time at the peak of 180 s.The calibration standard for Zr was Monastery Mine zircon and the accuracy of the method was checked by analysing the rutile standard R10 [41].
Equilibrium assemblage diagrams were calculated using Theriak-Domino [42], and the internally consistent thermodynamic dataset of [43].The mineral activity models are those of Holland and Powell [44] and Baldwin et al. [45] for feldspar, White et al. [46] for biotite, orthopyroxene, ilmenite and liquid, and Holland and Powll [47] and Green et al. [48] for clinopyroxene.Bulk rock composition is derived from major element XRF and TOC analyses (Tables S9 and S10).H 2 O concentrations are based on the "loss on ignition" (LOI) analysis subtracted by measured C content.The calculations were run assuming H 2 O activity of 0.5.The calculations were performed in the MnNCKFMASH-TCO (MnO-Na

Whole Rock Chemistry, Total Carbon (TC), Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and Total Sulphur (TS)
The whole rock chemistry on an extensive sample set of graphite schist in Vesterålen has been reported by Rønning et al. [39,49] and Gautneb et al. [15,50].The whole rock element analyses were conducted at NGU and measured on fused glass beads prepared by 1:7 dilution with lithium tetraborate.The samples were analysed on a PANalytical Axios XRF spectrometer equipped with a 4 kW Rh X-ray end-window tube, using common international standards for calibration.The whole rock major element analyses used for pseudosection modelling are presented in Supplementary Table S9.
The reported contents of total carbon (TC), total organic carbon (TOC) and total sulphur (TS) were analysed using a Leco SC-632 analyser.The detection limits were 0.06%, 0.1% and 0.02% for TC, TOC and TS, respectively.The analytical uncertainty at the 2 σ level was ±15%, ±20% and ±30%, respectively.TC and TOC used for pseudosection modelling are presented in Supplementary Table S10.
A Niton XL2 portable XRF was used for bulk rock chemical reconnaissance along the drill core, with 4 point measurements per metre down the core.

Stable Isotopes
C and O isotopic compositions of graphite and calcite (Table 2) were analysed from whole rock sample powder, and the presence of graphite versus calcite was verified by the TC and TOC results.Graphite-bearing samples for carbon isotope analyses were dried (60 • C) and homogenised before being weighed into tin capsules for analysis.Samples that contained both calcite and graphite were homogenised and dried as above, and split for C and O isotope analyses of calcite and C isotope analyses of graphite.To the latter part, 3 M HCl was added and left until the visible reaction stopped.The sample was washed and 3 M HCl was added again and left to react overnight to remove all carbonates.The samples were then repeatedly washed with DI water until near neutrality, dried (at 60 • C) and weighed.This method is the basis for reporting isotopic values for graphitic carbon (δ 13 C graphite ) in graphite schist and δ 18 O calcite values along with δ 13 C calcite values for carbonate carbon from marble samples (Table 2).
The graphite carbon isotopes were measured on a Thermo Scientific Flash EA 1112 connected to a Delta V Plus isotope ratio mass spectrometer, which was calibrated to meet international standards USGS24, IAEA-600 and IAEA-CH6.The calcite was measured on a Thermo Scientific Kiel IV connected to a MAT 253 dual inlet isotope ratio mass spectrometer, which was calibrated with two marble house standards that were calibrated to meet IAEA standards and the international standard NBS-18.All international standards were distributed by IAEA.External reproducibility (1σ) was always better than 0.08‰ for the calcite analyses.Repeated analyses of graphite δ 13 C were 0.25‰ or better.Values are given in ‰ relative to VPDB (Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite) for both C and O.

Field Relations
The graphite-rich zones in Vesterålen follow the banded gneiss sequence (Figure 1), where the graphite is concentrated in graphite schist within massive pyroxene-bearing quartzofeldspathic gneiss.The graphite-bearing units are poorly exposed, and the regional pattern of the graphite zones was determined by geophysical EM mapping [39,51,52].Based on combined EM measurements and field mapping, the graphite-rich zones were found to have thicknesses from <1 m to 200 m.They appear in large-scale foliation-parallel subvertical structures extending for several km along the strike, and as individual en echelon graphite lenses.
At shoreline exposures, the enriched graphite zones outcrop as dark-grey well-foliated schist (Figure 2).A strong schistosity causes the graphite zones to crumble easily (Figure 2a,b).At the best-exposed outcrop on the small island of Svinøy (Locality 2; Figure 2a,b,d), the foliation trend of the graphite schist can be followed northwards to the locality Skogsøy (Locality 1; Figure 2b,c,e) and southward to the locality Smines (Locality 3).An enrichment of graphite in the schist causes a lustrous rock colour (Figure 2f).
At shoreline exposures, the enriched graphite zones outcrop as dark-grey well-foliated schist (Figure 2).A strong schistosity causes the graphite zones to crumble easily (Figure 2a,b).At the best-exposed outcrop on the small island of Svinøy (Locality 2; Figure 2a,b,d), the foliation trend of the graphite schist can be followed northwards to the locality Skogsøy (Locality 1; Figure 2b,c,e) and southward to the locality Smines (Locality 3).An enrichment of graphite in the schist causes a lustrous rock colour (Figure 2f).There is a pronounced lithological contrast between massive host gneisses and the graphite schist (Figure 2c).The host pyroxene gneiss has a pale brownish colour, is massive and locally stromatic, and in the vicinity of graphite schist occurs with a There is a pronounced lithological contrast between massive host gneisses and the graphite schist (Figure 2c).The host pyroxene gneiss has a pale brownish colour, is massive and locally stromatic, and in the vicinity of graphite schist occurs with a characteristically rusty colour.Small lenses of host rock can occur internally in the graphite schist (Figure 2d).
Graphite-rich zones are sometimes associated with horizons of marbles and calcsilicate rocks, as for the Golia locality (Locality 4), Hornvatn (Locality 5) and Sommarland (Locality 7; Figure 3), and are locally intruded by charnockite, or with horizons of amphibolite (Table S1).
characteristically rusty colour.Small lenses of host rock can occur internally in the graphite schist (Figure 2d).
Graphite-rich zones are sometimes associated with horizons of marbles and calcsilicate rocks, as for the Golia locality (Locality 4), Hornvatn (Locality 5) and Sommarland (Locality 7; Figure 3), and are locally intruded by charnockite, or with horizons of amphibolite (Table S1).showing the typical setting of the graphite schist with close approximation to pyroxene gneisses, impure marbles and calcsilicates.Elemental variation is measured with a portable XRF and total carbon and sulphur by Leco analyser (see [39] for raw data).Red dots indicate the sample point of samples 1-3 in Table 3.
Several drill cores from the Vesterålen graphite deposits are described by Gautneb et al. and Rønning et al. [50,54] and Gautneb et al. [15].The drill core log in Figure 3 presents a typical setting for the graphite schist from Locality 7, Sommarland at Langøya, and is regarded as representative.The drill core loggings confirm the graphite schist's close relationships to the pyroxene gneiss, exemplifying a graphite schist in contact with a marble bench, including graphite-bearing marble and calcite-and graphite-bearing impure quartzite.Carbonate horizons are locally present, and the charnockite dykes cut the showing the typical setting of the graphite schist with close approximation to pyroxene gneisses, impure marbles and calcsilicates.Elemental variation is measured with a portable XRF and total carbon and sulphur by Leco analyser (see [39] for raw data).Red dots indicate the sample point of samples 1-3 in Table 3.
Several drill cores from the Vesterålen graphite deposits are described by Gautneb et al. and Rønning et al. [50,54] and Gautneb et al. [15].The drill core log in Figure 3 presents a typical setting for the graphite schist from Locality 7, Sommarland at Langøya, and is regarded as representative.The drill core loggings confirm the graphite schist's close relationships to the pyroxene gneiss, exemplifying a graphite schist in contact with a marble bench, including graphite-bearing marble and calcite-and graphite-bearing impure quartzite.Carbonate horizons are locally present, and the charnockite dykes cut the graphite-bearing units.The drill core logging also illustrates that disseminated graphite is present tens of metres deep into the host pyroxene gneisses.
Integrated with the drill core logging (Figure 3), bulk chemical data measured by portable XRF illustrates the strong heterogeneity of the schist in the graphite-bearing gneiss sequence.Leco analyses run through the graphite schist and host rock shows the strong relationships between logged graphite schist and graphite-bearing marble with high TC and TS.In addition to the chemical data presented in the drill core logs, whole rock chemistry and TC, TOC and TS analyses are presented in Gautneb et al. and Rønning et al. [15,39,50,54].
Graphite occurs as euhedral high-ordered flake graphite, with a heterogeneous grain size from fine to coarse.Graphite schist with high graphite concentrations shows a characteristic dissemination of coarse and fine flakes (Figure 4a,b).Graphite has a crystal-preferred orientation contributing to the well-developed foliation and schistosity of the rock, together with crystal-preferred oriented biotite (Figure 4c-e).In assemblage with graphite, the pyroxenes, quartz and feldspars constitute anhedral matrix minerals with metamorphic triple-point grain boundaries, and are normally fine-to medium-grained (Figure 4a-e).
Minerals 2023, 13, x 7 of 19 graphite-bearing units.The drill core logging also illustrates that disseminated graphite is present tens of metres deep into the host pyroxene gneisses.Integrated with the drill core logging (Figure 3), bulk chemical data measured by portable XRF illustrates the strong heterogeneity of the schist in the graphite-bearing gneiss sequence.Leco analyses run through the graphite schist and host rock shows the strong relationships between logged graphite schist and graphite-bearing marble with high TC and TS.In addition to the chemical data presented in the drill core logs, whole rock chemistry and TC, TOC and TS analyses are presented in Gautneb et al. and Rønning et al. [15,39,50,54].
In addition to the main graphite schist assemblage described above, a few localities show additional major phases of scapolite and epidote.The scapolite is a major phase in the graphite schist of Sommarland drill core 1702, but is also present in drill core 1701 (Table S1).The scapolite is Me74-81 with a variable Cl content up to 0.17 a.p.f.u., but is low in S (Table S7).At Møkland (Locality 6), scapolite is present as corona on sulphide, as Me36- The southernmost graphite deposit of Mofjord (Locality 8) also differs in mineralogy with the presence of clinozoisite, white mica and minor garnet.The clinozoisite is present as coarse porphyroblast up to several centimetres in size.The heterogranular white mica is muscovite with Si = 6.5-6.6 a.p.f.u. and Mg < 0.82 a.p.f.u.(Table S3).Very fine-grained euhedral garnet is spessartine Alm 16 Prp 47-48 Grs 5 Sps 31-32 (Table S5).
The gneiss is equigranular, fine-to medium-grained, with a metamorphic triple-point grain boundary texture.The texture is normally granoblastic but with a modal banding and shows a locally weak preferred orientation of biotite (Figure 4f).The transition from enriched graphite schist to pyroxene gneiss, although sharp in outcrops with respect to schistosity and strain, is petrographically and mineralogically gradual.Pyroxene gneiss shows a variable but increased graphite content towards graphite schist zones.The transition zone often has a rusty colour, which can be explained by a high sulphide content as pyrite, pyrrhotite and minor chalcopyrite (Figure 4g).

Pressure-Temperature Pseudosection Modelling
Pseudosection modelling was run to define the pressure-temperature condition and the phase stability fields of the graphite-bearing rocks.The presented pseudosection was calculated for the P-T window of 0.6-0.9GPa and 750-850 • C. Figure 6 is a representative pseudosection for graphite schist (sample VAE161, Locality 2 Svinøy).The calculation shows stability for the observed equilibrium assemblage of plagioclase + orthopyroxene + biotite + quartz + rutile + ilmenite + graphite at temperatures between 795 and 845 • C and pressures up to 0.85 GPa.Orthopyroxene is stable at temperatures above 780 • C, while biotite breaks down at T above 830 • C. Rutile is present throughout the calculated P-T interval, together with ilmenite, which shows the same stability as expected for the higher P-T end.Isopleths for the Mg# ratio of orthopyroxene (Table S2) were used to better constrain P-T conditions; the measured Mg# ratio = 0.74 indicates a stability field of 810-835 • C at 0.73-0.77GPa for the graphite-and orthopyroxene-bearing gneiss.lighter end of this range, being +6.1‰ and +3.5‰, respectively.The isotopic composition of the mixed graphitic and calcite carbon (δ 13 C calcite and δ 13 C graphite ) gives lighter values for the calcite (δ 13 C calcite = −8.7‰ to −9.5‰) and heavier values for graphite compared to the "pure" samples (δ 13 C graphite = −11.5‰ to −8.9‰).δ 18 O calcite for marble shows relatively light values for calcite ranging from −15.4‰ to −7.5‰, and the two samples VAE167 and VAE172 are at the lightest end of −15.4‰ to −13.6‰.The δ 18 O calcite of mixed graphite and calcite samples is also in the light range, from −15.6‰ to −15.3‰.
The degree of isotopic equilibrium between carbonate and graphitic carbon has been shown to be useful as a thermometer in high-grade metamorphic rocks.Our δ 13 C calcite and δ 13 C graphite pairs show a difference (∆ 13 C) of 1.98, 1.63 and 0.32, respectively (samples som1701-59, 60 and 61; Table 3).We calculated the equilibrium temperature using the approach of Dunn and Valley [58] and Wada and Suzuki [59].Two out of three pairs yielded reasonable temperature estimates, yielding temperatures ranging from 850 to 900 • C. One pair, however, that showed a very small ∆ 13 C (0.32), yielded a very high, likely unrealistic apparent temperature (1130-1156 • C), representing calcite and graphite grains that did not acquire isotopic equilibrium, or that were disturbed during later metamorphic events.Apart from a brief mention in Baker and Fallick [37,38], the carbon isotope composition of graphite in the investigated area has not yet been reported.In general, a light composition of graphite (δ 13 C graphite , around −25‰) indicates organic deposited carbon (e.g., [4]).δ 13 C graphite values in our graphite schists from Vesterålen range from −38 to −17‰ and are consistent with the typical variation for Archean and Proterozoic organic matter (e.g., [60][61][62][63]).
For the calcite in marbles, the unusually heavy δ 13 C calcite of +3‰ to about +10‰ (average of +8.6‰) of the Vesterålen marbles, also noted by Baker and Fallick [37], has later been explained by their formation during the global Lomagundi-Jatuli isotopic excursion, which in Fennoscandia was age-constrained to the 2.20-2.06Ga interval (e.g., [62,64,65]), when such isotopically anomalous carbonates accumulated.Assuming this is correct, this means that the organic matter is the source rock for the Vesterålen graphite mineralisation deposited contemporaneously with the Shungite in Russian Karelia [15,19,66].
A reworking of carbon can cause a shift from δ 13 C to heavier composition, although it is relatively resistant to resetting.The present graphite mineralisation in Vesterålen occurring as disseminated graphite or as concentrations in graphite schist in the granulite basement still show relatively light values, but the granulitisation may explain the spread of the data up to −17‰ (Table 2).The later metamorphism, forming the high-grade graphite mineralisation, occurred alternatively during the reported Early Proterozoic event [32,67] or during the emplacement of the AMCG suite at 1870-1790 Ma [31].
The notably heavier δ 13 C graphite composition of the mixed graphite and calcite in samples SOM1701-59, SOM1701-60 and SOM1701-61 of −11.5 to −8.9 is explained by an exchange of isotopes between the graphite and calcite during metamorphism, also resulting in the markedly lighter δ 13 C calcite of −9.5 to −8.6.
δ 18 O calcite will more easily be disturbed by an alteration shifting towards lighter signatures.The δ 18 O calcite of the marbles in our studied samples of Vesterålen is relatively light, ranging from −15.4‰ to −7.5‰, and possibly reflects metamorphic and hydrothermal processes.

Granulite Facies Metamorphic Formation of High-Ordered Graphite
Our petrographic investigations illustrate the high-ordered structure of graphite in the Vesterålen complex (Figure 4).The crystallographic and mineralogical properties, including the Raman spectroscopy of graphite from other study areas, were well documented by Palosaari, Latonen, Smått, Blomqvist and Eklund [14], who studied the quality of the graphite from the Golia-Hornvatnet area (our localities 4-5, Figure 1).By using XRD and Raman spectroscopy, Palosaari, Latonen, Smått, Blomqvist and Eklund [14] found that the spacing of the (002) reflection was in the range of 0.335-0.336nm, and G and 2D bands were present at c. 1579 cm −1 and c. 1350 cm −1 , respectively, documenting the well-developed crystallisation and full ordering of the graphite [68,69] 2016).Rantitsch, Lämmerer, Fisslthaler, Mitsche and Kaltenböck [69] included Raman spectroscopy data from the adjacent Skaland graphite deposit, with a similar geological setting to the present research area [16] and references therein, and showed that the graphite from Skaland is also fully ordered.Based on the Raman measurements, Palosaari, Latonen, Smått, Blomqvist and Eklund [14] determined the temperature of graphite formation to be 575-620 • C.This is lower than our estimated temperatures based on PT pseudosection, Zr-in rutile measurement and isotopic equilibrium.The thermometer based on Raman spectroscopy is sensitive to the measuring procedures [70] and has a restricted temperature range, particularly with respect to high temperature, and the peak T conditions in the graphitebearing rocks of the Vesterålen complex are by all probability near the upper limit or above what is applicable for Raman spectroscopy, even when using the extended temperature intervals presented by Ratitisch and Linner [71].
In this study, we document the metamorphic graphite equilibrated with orthopyroxene (Figure 4e,g).Although graphite usually occurs in quartzitic and metapelitic rocks, or as vein deposits in the granulite facies crust, descriptions of graphite-orthopyroxene stability are few [6,72].Pseudosection modelling of graphite-orthopyroxene paragenesis (plagioclase + orthopyroxene; Mg#-ratio = 0.74 + biotite + quartz + rutile + ilmenite + graphite) constrains its stability field to pressure-temperature conditions of 810-835 • C and 0.73-0.77GPa (Figure 6), in accordance with granulite facies stability.Zr-in-rutile T estimates from graphite schist, although they show a larger spread of 726-854 • C (Table 1), overlap with the results from the pseudosection modelling.
The thermometer based on the isotopic equilibrium between carbonate and graphitic carbon gives additional support to the high-grade metamorphic conditions of graphite equilibration, where the δ 13 C calcite and δ 13 C graphite pairs indicate an equilibrium temperature ranging from 850 to 901 • C [58,59].

Role of Fluids
Graphite can originate by the metamorphism of organic deposited carbon; CO 2 fluxing and precipitation by decreasing carbon solubility, including fluid cooling [3]; water loss from mixed fluids during the hydrating reaction [4]; or the infiltration of fluid into a more reduced environment [5,73].
The importance of CO 2 fluid in orthopyroxene-bearing granulite facies metamorphism is well documented [18,20,74] and the formation of the anhydrous granulite has been explained by a massive CO 2 flux through the lower crust.Suggested sources of CO 2 include magmatic, mantle-derived, metamorphic decarbonitisation reactions or devolatilisation reactions in organic matter (e.g., [23]).The explanation of CO 2 infiltration is also controversial (e.g., [21]) and alternative explanations include dehydration by partial melting or the metamorphism of nearly dry rocks.
The δ 13 C graphite range of the graphite schists from Vesterålen studied here is consistent with the typical variation for Archean and Proterozoic organic deposited carbon, as discussed above.A reworking of carbon by later granulite-facies metamorphism can explain the shift of the δ 13 C graphite to a heavier composition and the spread of the isotopic data (Table 2).This high-grade metamorphic overprint is further supported by the markedly heavier composition of the mixed graphite and calcite in samples SOM1701-59, SOM1701-60 and SOM1701-61 of δ 13 C graphite of −11.5 to −8.9, as a result of the exchange of isotopes between the graphite and calcite.
Although the carbon signature shows an organic deposited origin of the graphite, fluid mobility during high-grade metamorphism acts as an additional process in the petrogenesis of the high-ordered graphite.This coincides with [75], which described mixed metamorphic and fluid graphite deposition in Palaeoproterozoic sedimentary rocks of the Lewisian Complex.CO 2 infiltration may cause both orthopyroxene formation and graphite deposition.In our rocks, the intimate petrographic intergrowth of graphite with the minerals orthopyroxene, biotite, quartz and feldspar illustrates the relevance of the presence of CO 2 for the stabilisation of graphite in the orthopyroxene gneisses.The equilibration of graphite in granulite can occur via the following reaction: The release of H 2 O is also a redox reaction (reducing CO 2 ), depositing graphite by releasing O 2 .In a reduced environment, graphite can precipitate directly from CO 2 (e.g., [4]).This is possible if the rock mineral assemblage buffers f O 2 (e.g., [73]), and coincides with the presence of pyrrhotite, pyrite and chalcopyrite in the graphite schist (Figure 5; [5,76]).Although regional CO 2 flux through the lower crust has been argued by [18,20,74], the close spatial occurrence of carbonate with the graphite schist in the Vestrålen complex may have acted as a CO 2 source during high-grade metamorphism, producing the observed clinopyroxene and olivine/forsterite as calcsilicate minerals: The signature of CO 2 presence is also evident from the occurrence of meionitic (CO 2bearing) scapolite (Me 74-81 ).The importance of redox reactions for graphite deposition is illustrated by the contemporaneous occurrence of graphite within sulphide-rich horizons (Figures 2c,d and 5d), a situation which is also documented by Parnell et The intimate intergrowths of graphite with dolomite, calcite and forsterite/serpentine illustrate the relevance of the reactions above (samples VAE167, SOM1701-30.63,SOM1701-33.7 and SOM1701-45; Figure 4h).The contribution of SiO 2 to form calcsilicate minerals can alternatively be sourced from the original impure carbonate.
Additional evidence of the fluid effect on graphite deposition is the local high Mg# of biotite and pyroxenes in the graphite-bearing zones (Tables S2 and S4; Figure 5a-c).The increased Mg# values indicate metasomatism [77,78] related to graphite deposition.Furthermore, the same zones show an enrichment in Cl and F evidenced by their high content of apatite (Table S8; Figure 5d).High Cl content is an additional fluid flow tracer, as documented by Kullerud [35,79] from the AMCG suite of the neighbouring Lofoten-Vesterålen Complex, where Cl acts as an active ligand, enhancing element transport (e.g., [79][80][81]).

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Geological map of Vesterålen, north Norway.Main sampled graphite localities are numbered.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Geological map of Vesterålen, north Norway.Main sampled graphite localities are numbered.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Field pictures of graphite schist and host rock (abbreviations after Whitney and Evans [53]).(a) A c. 10 m thick zone of graphite schist in pyroxene gneiss.The locality illustrates the easily crumbled nature of the graphite, which causes few and poor exposures of this rock.Svinøy (Loc.2).(b) Strongly foliated and schistose graphite schist at Svinøy (Loc.2).The direction of foliation illustrates that the graphite schist horizon continues under the sea and is exposed again at the shoreline of Skogsøy (Loc. 1) across the fjord.(c) Strongly foliated and schistose dark-grey graphite schist in contact with massive pyroxene gneiss.The rusty colour of the gneiss indicates a high content of sulphide.Skogsøy (Loc.1).(d) A 15 cm thick rusty pyroxene gneiss lens included in the graphite schist, Svinøy (Loc.2).(e) Dark-grey graphite schist, easily crumbling at the shoreline locality of Skogsøy (Loc.1).(f) Graphite schist at Hornvatn (Loc.5).The enrichment in graphite causes the lustrous colour of the rock.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Field pictures of graphite schist and host rock (abbreviations after Whitney and Evans [53]).(a) A c. 10 m thick zone of graphite schist in pyroxene gneiss.The locality illustrates the easily crumbled nature of the graphite, which causes few and poor exposures of this rock.Svinøy (Loc.2).(b) Strongly foliated and schistose graphite schist at Svinøy (Loc.2).The direction of foliation illustrates that the graphite schist horizon continues under the sea and is exposed again at the shoreline of Skogsøy (Loc. 1) across the fjord.(c) Strongly foliated and schistose dark-grey graphite schist in contact with massive pyroxene gneiss.The rusty colour of the gneiss indicates a high content of sulphide.Skogsøy (Loc.1).(d) A 15 cm thick rusty pyroxene gneiss lens included in the graphite schist, Svinøy (Loc.2).(e) Dark-grey graphite schist, easily crumbling at the shoreline locality of Skogsøy (Loc.1).(f) Graphite schist at Hornvatn (Loc.5).The enrichment in graphite causes the lustrous colour of the rock.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Drill core (Sommarland, Loc.7)showing the typical setting of the graphite schist with close approximation to pyroxene gneisses, impure marbles and calcsilicates.Elemental variation is measured with a portable XRF and total carbon and sulphur by Leco analyser (see[39] for raw data).Red dots indicate the sample point of samples 1-3 in Table3.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Drill core (Sommarland, Loc.7)showing the typical setting of the graphite schist with close approximation to pyroxene gneisses, impure marbles and calcsilicates.Elemental variation is measured with a portable XRF and total carbon and sulphur by Leco analyser (see[39] for raw data).Red dots indicate the sample point of samples 1-3 in Table3.