Phosphatic Biomineralization in Scyphozoa (Cnidaria): A Review

: Phosphatic biomineralization is unknown in modern species of Scyphozoa (Cnidaria). However, some extinct groups of Scyphozoa, such as conulariids and Sphenothallus , were capable of secreting phosphatic exoskeletons. Both conulariids and Sphenothallus used apatite to improve the mechanical properties of their skeletons, which offered better protection than the non-biomineralized periderms. The skeletons of conulariids and Sphenothallus have a lamellar microstructure. The shell lamellae of conulariids are often pierced by tiny pores. Several apatitic mineral structures have been described in conulariids and Sphenothallus , including plywood-like structures. Different lattice parameters of the apatite indicate that the biomineralization mechanisms of the phosphatic cnidarians Sphenothallus and conulariids differed from each other.

Sphenothallus is an extinct genus of marine phosphatic tubicolous fossils known from the early Cambrian [16,17] to the Carboniferous [18] and it has an almost global distribution. Sphenothallus has been affiliated variously with conulariids [19] and hydroids due to their slightly conical shells. In the "Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology", [20] it was placed among the conulariids. Some authors have affiliated it with annelid worms [21], whereas others have allied with cnidarians [14,22]. The latter opinion has recently been supported by most of the authors and there is general agreement that Sphenothallus is a scyphozoan [9,16,17,23].
Torellella is an extinct genus of slightly conical, phosphatic tubicolous marine organisms of unknown biological affinity. They have been allied either with annelids [24] or cnidarians [25]. Based on the apatitic composition of the periderm and the microlamellar structure, one could compare Torellella with Sphenothallus. It is likely that Torellella was a Sphenothallus-like scyphozoan.
The aim of the present paper is to review known mineral microstructures and mineral compositions of fossil scyphozoans, and to discuss their biomineralization.

Materials and Methods
All below illustrated sections of phosphatic cnidarian skeletons are natural surfaces photographed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Some samples were gold sput-

Skeletal Microstructures and Mineral Composition of Conulariids
The conulariid periderm is made up of phosphatic lamellae. Typical conulariid resembles an ice-cream cone with fourfold symmetry and usually four prominently-grooved corners ( Figure 1).

Skeletal Microstructures and Mineral Composition of Conulariids
The conulariid periderm is made up of phosphatic lamellae. Typical conulariid resembles an ice-cream cone with fourfold symmetry and usually four prominently-grooved corners ( Figure 1).   The microlamellar fabric ( Figure 2) is composed of extremely thin (approximately 0.5-3 µm) microlamellae that are alternately organic poor and organic rich [4,15]. The boundaries of microlamellae are variably distinct. Organic-rich microlamellae are interconnected by slender strands of organic matter that are embedded in calcium phosphate [4,15]. Microlamellae may be organized in thicker (approximately 5-75 µm) layers, or macrolamellae, that have variable organic matter content [4,14]. The thickness of macrolamellae The microlamellar fabric ( Figure 2) is composed of extremely thin (approximately 0.5-3 μm) microlamellae that are alternately organic poor and organic rich [4,15]. The boundaries of microlamellae are variably distinct. Organic-rich microlamellae are interconnected by slender strands of organic matter that are embedded in calcium phosphate [4,15]. Microlamellae may be organized in thicker (approximately 5-75 μm) layers, or macrolamellae, that have variable organic matter content [4,14]. The thickness of macrolamellae can vary within a single specimen. The surfaces of lamellae are smooth or pierced with microscopic pores. The microlamellar fabric has been reported in Archaeoconularia, Baccaconularia, Conularia, Conularina, Climacoconus, Holoconularia, Metaconularia, Paraconularia, and Pseudoconularia [2,4,15].

Micropores
In many conulariids, shell lamellae exhibit locally abundant, microscopic circular pores [26][27][28]. Owing probably to variation in the inclination of the micropores to the microlamellae, the rim of the micropores is usually circular to subcircular, but in some cases it may also be elliptical [29]. Micropores with circular rims are probably oriented with the axis of the pore channel perpendicular to the surface of the microlamellae, whereas those with elliptical rims are probably inclined, and thus represent oblique sections ( Figure 3). Both circular and elliptical rims may occur on the same surface, their arrangement is random and shapes are transitional; that is, there are no discrete rim types [29]. The diameters of the pores range from approximately 2 µm to approximately 12 µm. In some specimens, the pores are relatively sparse (i.e., about eight pores per 1 mm 2 ) whereas in most specimens, the pores are numerous, with up to about 100 pores in an area of only 0.1 mm 2 [28]. The pores have been reported from Archaeoconularia, Baccaconularia, Conularia, Conularina, Climacoconus, Ctenoconularia, Eoconularia, Exoconularia; Holoconularia, Metaconularia, Paraconularia and Pseudoconularia [26][27][28].

Micropores
In many conulariids, shell lamellae exhibit locally abundant, microscopic circular pores [26][27][28]. Owing probably to variation in the inclination of the micropores to the microlamellae, the rim of the micropores is usually circular to subcircular, but in some cases it may also be elliptical [29]. Micropores with circular rims are probably oriented with the axis of the pore channel perpendicular to the surface of the microlamellae, whereas those with elliptical rims are probably inclined, and thus represent oblique sections ( Figure 3). Both circular and elliptical rims may occur on the same surface, their arrangement is random and shapes are transitional; that is, there are no discrete rim types [29]. The diameters of the pores range from approximately 2 µm to approximately 12 µm. In some specimens, the pores are relatively sparse (i.e., about eight pores per 1 mm 2 ) whereas in most specimens, the pores are numerous, with up to about 100 pores in an area of only 0.1 mm 2 [28]. The pores have been reported from Archaeoconularia, Baccaconularia, Conularia, Conularina, Climacoconus, Ctenoconularia, Eoconularia, Exoconularia; Holoconularia, Metaconularia, Paraconularia and Pseudoconularia [26][27][28].

Skeletal Microstructures and Mineral Composition of Sphenothallus
The periderm of Sphenothallus is made up of phosphatic lamellae and it has a tubular shape ( Figure 4).

Skeletal Microstructures and Mineral Composition of Sphenothallus
The periderm of Sphenothallus is made up of phosphatic lamellae and it has a tubular shape ( Figure 4).

Microlamellar Fabric
The structure is formed by a succession of thin apatitic lamellae ( Figure 5) [14,30,31]. The development and thickness of the lamellae are variable within a single specimen. The lamellae are 3 to 170 μm thick [14,31]. The thickest lamellae occur in the external part of the tube wall at the lateral thickenings, whereas the thinnest lamellae are most common in the inner parts of the tube wall away from the lateral thickenings of the tube [31]. The boundaries of the lamellae usually have variable sharpness, a common characteristic of both Ordovician and Carboniferous material [14,31]. Some boundaries constitute real gaps in the mineral structure, whereas others are artefacts caused by differences in crystal size and appear as parallel zones in the tube wall of Sphenothallus. The sharpness of the boundaries of individual lamella can change laterally within the tube [14,31].

Microlamellar Fabric
The structure is formed by a succession of thin apatitic lamellae ( Figure 5) [14,30,31]. The development and thickness of the lamellae are variable within a single specimen. The lamellae are 3 to 170 µm thick [14,31]. The thickest lamellae occur in the external part of the tube wall at the lateral thickenings, whereas the thinnest lamellae are most common in the inner parts of the tube wall away from the lateral thickenings of the tube [31]. The boundaries of the lamellae usually have variable sharpness, a common characteristic of both Ordovician and Carboniferous material [14,31]. Some boundaries constitute real gaps in the mineral structure, whereas others are artefacts caused by differences in crystal size and appear as parallel zones in the tube wall of Sphenothallus. The sharpness of the boundaries of individual lamella can change laterally within the tube [14,31].

Microlamellar Fabric
The structure is formed by a succession of thin apatitic lamellae ( Figure 5) [14,30,31]. The development and thickness of the lamellae are variable within a single specimen. The lamellae are 3 to 170 μm thick [14,31]. The thickest lamellae occur in the external part of the tube wall at the lateral thickenings, whereas the thinnest lamellae are most common in the inner parts of the tube wall away from the lateral thickenings of the tube [31]. The boundaries of the lamellae usually have variable sharpness, a common characteristic of both Ordovician and Carboniferous material [14,31]. Some boundaries constitute real gaps in the mineral structure, whereas others are artefacts caused by differences in crystal size and appear as parallel zones in the tube wall of Sphenothallus. The sharpness of the boundaries of individual lamella can change laterally within the tube [14,31].

Wrinkled Lamellae
There are laminae in Sphenothallus from the Carboniferous of Russia which have a wavy structure (Figure 5), and some lamellae are so wrinkled that they form hollow "ribs" within the tube wall, mostly in the lateral parts of the tube, where the wall is thickest [31].

Cylindrical Shafts
There are 2.0-2.5 µm wide cylindrical shafts ( Figure 6) visible on the surface of an inner lamella of Shenothallus from the Carboniferous of Russia [31]. These structures are preserved mostly in the form of shallow, slightly curved to straight grooves on the surfaces of the lamella, but some extend to the interior of the lamella in the form of cylindrical shafts. The lamellae with shafts have a smooth surface and are not composed of fibres. The entire surface of the lamellae is crowded with grooves and shafts [31]. There are laminae in Sphenothallus from the Carboniferous of Russia which have a wavy structure (Figure 5), and some lamellae are so wrinkled that they form hollow "ribs" within the tube wall, mostly in the lateral parts of the tube, where the wall is thickest [31].

Cylindrical Shafts
There are 2.0-2.5 μm wide cylindrical shafts ( Figure 6) visible on the surface of an inner lamella of Shenothallus from the Carboniferous of Russia [31]. These structures are preserved mostly in the form of shallow, slightly curved to straight grooves on the surfaces of the lamella, but some extend to the interior of the lamella in the form of cylindrical shafts. The lamellae with shafts have a smooth surface and are not composed of fibres. The entire surface of the lamellae is crowded with grooves and shafts [31].

Homogeneous Granular Structure
The structure is composed of apatite in the form of subspherical crystallites measuring <500 nm in maximum diameter (Figure 7). The crystal size of apatite forming the homogeneous microstructure is variable and can be larger near the inter-lamellar boundaries [14].

Homogeneous Granular Structure
The structure is composed of apatite in the form of subspherical crystallites measuring <500 nm in maximum diameter (Figure 7). The crystal size of apatite forming the homogeneous microstructure is variable and can be larger near the inter-lamellar boundaries [14].

Plywood Structure
This structure consists of fibres ( Figure 8) which are best observed in lateral parts of the tube wall [31]. The fibrous layers in the tube wall can be up to 70 µm thick. The fibres are at least tens of micrometres long and 1.5-2.0 µm thick. All fibres are parallel to the surface of the tube wall. The fibres within individual lamellae have the same, but in successive laminae they differ in orientation by irregularly varying angles. This structure occurs only in Sphenothallus from the Carboniferous of Russia [31].

Plywood Structure
This structure consists of fibres ( Figure 8) which are best observed in lateral parts of the tube wall [31]. The fibrous layers in the tube wall can be up to 70 μm thick. The fibres are at least tens of micrometres long and 1.5-2.0 μm thick. All fibres are parallel to the surface of the tube wall. The fibres within individual lamellae have the same, but in successive laminae they differ in orientation by irregularly varying angles. This structure occurs only in Sphenothallus from the Carboniferous of Russia [31].
An EDX analysis of a Carboniferous Sphenothallus by Vinn and Mironenko (2021) [31] detected no differences in elemental composition between smooth, fibrillar and globular layers of the Sphenothallus tube; they are all phosphatic.
An EDX analysis of a Carboniferous Sphenothallus by Vinn and Mironenko (2021) [31] detected no differences in elemental composition between smooth, fibrillar and globular layers of the Sphenothallus tube; they are all phosphatic.  [14]. Figure 9. X-ray diffraction pattern of Sphenothallus sp. from the Upper Ordovician of Estonia [14].
An EDX analysis of a Carboniferous Sphenothallus by Vinn and Mironenko (2021) [31] detected no differences in elemental composition between smooth, fibrillar and globular layers of the Sphenothallus tube; they are all phosphatic.

Skeletal Microstructures and Mineral Composition of Torellella
The periderm of Torellella is made up of phosphatic lamellae and it has a tubular shape ( Figure 10).

Skeletal Microstructures and Mineral Composition of Torellella
The periderm of Torellella is made up of phosphatic lamellae and it has a tubular shape ( Figure 10).

Microlamellar Fabric
The tubes of Torellella sulcata from the upper Cambrian of Estonia exhibit lamellae of variable thickness (Figure 11). The original tube structure seems to be microlamellar with growth laminae about 1μm thick. The surfaces of the lamellae are smooth without any perforations and have either homogeneous granular or fibrous ultrastructure [25].

Skeletal Structures Microlamellar Fabric
The tubes of Torellella sulcata from the upper Cambrian of Estonia exhibit lamellae of variable thickness (Figure 11). The original tube structure seems to be microlamellar with growth laminae about 1µm thick. The surfaces of the lamellae are smooth without any perforations and have either homogeneous granular or fibrous ultrastructure [25].

Microlamellar Fabric
The tubes of Torellella sulcata from the upper Cambrian of Estonia exhibit lamellae of variable thickness (Figure 11). The original tube structure seems to be microlamellar with growth laminae about 1μm thick. The surfaces of the lamellae are smooth without any perforations and have either homogeneous granular or fibrous ultrastructure [25].

Fibrous Structure
This structure ( Figure 13) consists of fibres that have same orientation within the growth lamellae and are parallel to the surface of the tube wall. The fibres are 0.2-0.3 μm thick and about 4-6 μm long [25]. In T. gracilenta from the lower Cambrian of Siberia, each lamella is composed of fibres; neighboring lamellae contain variously directed fibres [24].

Fibrous Structure
This structure ( Figure 13) consists of fibres that have same orientation within the growth lamellae and are parallel to the surface of the tube wall. The fibres are 0.2-0.3 µm thick and about 4-6 µm long [25]. In T. gracilenta from the lower Cambrian of Siberia, each lamella is composed of fibres; neighboring lamellae contain variously directed fibres [24].

Mineral Composition
The X-ray structural analysis performed by Esakova and Zhegallo [32] showed that tubes of Torellella lentiformis from the Lower Cambrian of the Siberian Platform and T. gracilenta from the lower Cambrian of Mongolia consist of francolite (i.e., carbonate rich fluorapatite).

Fibrous Structure
This structure (Figure 13) consists of fibres that have same orientation within the growth lamellae and are parallel to the surface of the tube wall. The fibres are 0.2-0.3 μm thick and about 4-6 μm long [25]. In T. gracilenta from the lower Cambrian of Siberia, each lamella is composed of fibres; neighboring lamellae contain variously directed fibres [24].

Mineral Composition
The X-ray structural analysis performed by Esakova and Zhegallo [32] showed that tubes of Torellella lentiformis from the Lower Cambrian of the Siberian Platform and T. gracilenta from the lower Cambrian of Mongolia consist of francolite (i.e., carbonate rich fluorapatite).

Biomineralization in Conulariids
The secretion of the conulariid periderm was likely cyclic. The conulariids secreted cyclically organic-rich and organic-poor mucus, which allowed the creation of periderm composed of alternating organic-rich and organic-poor apatitic lamellae [14]. The conulariid started to secrete its periderm beginning with the outermost lamella. It is not known whether the conulariids started to build their periderm with organic-rich lamellae or vice versa with organic-poor, mostly mineral lamellae. However, one could hypothesize that organic-rich lamellae may have served as a scaffold for the biomineralization of

Biomineralization in Conulariids
The secretion of the conulariid periderm was likely cyclic. The conulariids secreted cyclically organic-rich and organic-poor mucus, which allowed the creation of periderm composed of alternating organic-rich and organic-poor apatitic lamellae [14]. The conulariid started to secrete its periderm beginning with the outermost lamella. It is not known whether the conulariids started to build their periderm with organic-rich lamellae or vice versa with organic-poor, mostly mineral lamellae. However, one could hypothesize that organic-rich lamellae may have served as a scaffold for the biomineralization of organicpoor mineral lamellae. Organic matrices in skeletons in general serve as templates for biomineralization [33][34][35], but they also add tensile and elastic strength to the mineral component [15], thus forming a strong biocomposite material. There is a striking similarity between composite materials and the conulariid periderm [15]. Composite materials have one component with good mechanical strength, such as apatite in conulariids, and another with good elastic properties, such as organic-rich lamellae in conulariids [15]. Such composite materials perform much better under all kinds of stresses than shells made of purely rigid or elastic materials [35,36]. The pores in conulariid lamellae were likely part of the original shell structure [29]. They may have also served the function of enhancing the mechanical properties of the mineral lamellae if they were filled with elastic organic material. In addition, or alternatively, they may have supported the biomineralization of mineral lamellae if they contained organic matrix. The conulariids exhibit a single, simple homogeneous granular ultrastructure. The lack of diverse microstructures in conulariids contrasts with the otherwise complex architecture of their periderm. It is possible that the conulariids' biomineralization mechanism was unable to control the orientation of the crystallographic axis of individual crystals.

Biomineralization in Sphenothallus
Some macrolamellae form hollow ribs in Carboniferous Sphentothallus from Russia. It is possible that lamellae with a higher organic content became wrinkled, owing to contraction after the decay of the organic material [31]. This may indicate that the content of organic matter varied between different macrolamellae. The wrinkled macrolamellae cannot be directly compared to organic-rich microlamellae in conulariids due to their large differences in thickness. However, the biomineralization system of Sphenothallus was clearly capable of secreting lamellae with different compositions.
There are cylindrical shafts in the lamella of Sphenothallus from the Carboniferous of Russia. The orientation of cylindrical shafts (sub-parallel to the surface of lamella) and their morphology indicates that they presumably were not part of the original shell structure of Sphenothallus, but are actually borings [31]. These borings are different from the pores found in conulariids [28] and their size corresponds to microbioerosion. It is likely that some lamellae of Sphenothallus periderm were bored by some chemical means by microorganisms feeding on the organic compounds of the lamella [31].
It is generally agreed that the original composition of Sphenothallus tubes was organophosphatic [9,22,30]. However, it is not clear which microstructures were originally apatitic and which might be phosphatized organic tissues. The homogenous granular microstructure of Sphenothallus is similar to that of conuilariids' periderm microstructure and is either an original peridermal structure or the result of diagenetic alternation of the original apatitic structure. The plywood structure is more difficult to interpret, as there is no analogy among phosphatic invertebrate skeletal microstructures [37]. There are two possibilities: the plywood structure could be either phosphatized organic tissue, or it is an original biomineral apatitic structure. In the latter case, the biomineralization of Sphenothallus was extremely advanced and different from that of conulariids, being comparable only to that of vertebrates.

Biomineralization in Torellella
Vinn [25] interpreted the fibrous structure of Torellella as an original biomineral ultrastructure of the tube. The plywood structure in Sphenothallus is similar to the fibrous lamellae in Torellella and may also have a similar origin. The biomineralization of Torellella seems to resemble more that of Sphenothallus than of conulariids. This is not surprising, considering the fact that Torellella is morphologically closer to Sphenothallus than to conulariids.

Biomineralization in Scyphozoa
The scyphozoans possess just two types of skeletal microstructures, far fewer than the 15 types of calcareous microstructures present in anthozoans. This may indicate that calcareous biomineralization was better suited for the physiology of cnidarians. Medosozoans possess the highest number of known phosphatic microstructures in Cnidaria, though still fewer than the number of known phosphatic structures in brachiopods [37].
The skeletal microstructures, and likely also the processes of skeletogenesis, are similar in conulariids, Sphenothallus and Torellella, but they are somewhat different from those of other phosphatic invertebrates, such as brachiopods. The mineral composition of the scyphozoan periderm is also similar in conulariids, Sphenothallus and Torellella, with all three taxa being composed of francolite (i.e., carbonate rich fluorapatite) [14]. Nevertheless, there are some differences between the lattice parameters of Conularia and Sphenothallus ( Figure 14), though their apatites are somewhat similar to that of fossil Lingula and sedimentary apatites. The latter similarity is presumably due to the fossilization process.

Biomineralization in Scyphozoa
The scyphozoans possess just two types of skeletal microstructures, far fewer than the 15 types of calcareous microstructures present in anthozoans. This may indicate that calcareous biomineralization was better suited for the physiology of cnidarians. Medosozoans possess the highest number of known phosphatic microstructures in Cnidaria, though still fewer than the number of known phosphatic structures in brachiopods [37].
The skeletal microstructures, and likely also the processes of skeletogenesis, are similar in conulariids, Sphenothallus and Torellella, but they are somewhat different from those of other phosphatic invertebrates, such as brachiopods. The mineral composition of the scyphozoan periderm is also similar in conulariids, Sphenothallus and Torellella, with all three taxa being composed of francolite (i.e., carbonate rich fluorapatite) [14]. Nevertheless, there are some differences between the lattice parameters of Conularia and Sphenothallus ( Figure 14), though their apatites are somewhat similar to that of fossil Lingula and sedimentary apatites. The latter similarity is presumably due to the fossilization process. Figure 14. Lattice parameters of Sphenothallus apatite compared with Conularia and other biological and sedimentary apatites [14]. The length of unit cell edges: a and c. Data about other organisms and sedimentary apatites from Nemliher [38].

Conclusions
The skeletal microstructures, and likely also the processes of skeletogenesis, are similar in all fossil scyphozoans. All fossil scyphozoans (i.e., conulariids, Sphenothallus and Torellella) have a microlamellar periderm composed of francolite. The plywood structure in Sphenothallus and the fibrous structure in Torellella could be either phosphatized organic tissues or original biomineral apatitic structures. In the latter case, the bio- Figure 14. Lattice parameters of Sphenothallus apatite compared with Conularia and other biological and sedimentary apatites [14]. The length of unit cell edges: a and c. Data about other organisms and sedimentary apatites from Nemliher [38].

Conclusions
The skeletal microstructures, and likely also the processes of skeletogenesis, are similar in all fossil scyphozoans. All fossil scyphozoans (i.e., conulariids, Sphenothallus and Torellella) have a microlamellar periderm composed of francolite. The plywood structure in Sphenothallus and the fibrous structure in Torellella could be either phosphatized organic tissues or original biomineral apatitic structures. In the latter case, the biomineralization of Sphenothallus and Torellella was extremely advanced compared with those of other phosphatic invertebrates. The lack of diverse ultrastructures in conulariids contrasts with the otherwise complex architecture of their periderm, indicating that the biomineralization mechanism of conulariids was incapable of controlling the crystallographic orientation of individual crystallites.