Magmatic Material in Sandstone Shows Prospects for New Diamond Deposits within the Northern East European Platform

: A detailed study of sandstones recovered from the upper part of the recently discovered KL-01 magmatic pipe in the southern part of the Arkhangelsk diamondiferous province (ADP), containing magmatic material and rare kimberlite indicator minerals, is presented in this paper. Results are compared to the composition of crater samples of the highly diamondiferous Vladimir Grib kimberlite pipe and several poorly to non-diamondiferous ADP pipes. To identify the type of magmatic material admixture, a model of binary mixing between country Vendian sandstones and typical ADP magmatic rocks based on correlations of La/Yb and Zr/Nb ratios and Ni contents is proposed. The modeling results show that the type of magmatic component in the KL-01 samples can be identiﬁed as kimberlite, with a maximum admixture of 20 vol. %. Kimberlite indicator mineral geochemistry did not exclude the interpretation that the composition, structure, thermal state and metasomatic enrichment of the lithospheric mantle sampled by the KL-01 pipe were suitable for the formation and preservation of diamonds. The lower boundary of the sampled lithospheric mantle could be in the depth range of 175–190 km, with a diamond window width of 55–70 km. Thus, the sandstones could represent the upper level of the crater of a new kimberlite pipe.


Introduction
The Arkhangelsk region (with an area of~590,000 km 2 ), located in the northern portion of the East European Platform (Figure 1), is one of the major industrial diamondiferous areas in Russia. To date,~100 magmatic bodies of mafic and ultramafic compositions are known within the northern part of the region and form the Arkhangelsk diamondiferous province (ADP, with an area of~19,000 km 2 [1]). Two major diamond deposits are found within the ADP: the Lomonosov and Grib mines [2]. Since the discovery of the V. Grib kimberlite pipe in 1996, no new diamondiferous kimberlites have been identified either within the ADP or within the region. However, recent studies [1,3] show that several areas, both within the ADP and outside it, have high potential to host local diamondiferous kimberlite sources.
Most of the ADP magmatic bodies were discovered during the 1970s and 1980s, a period of intense geological prospecting works for diamonds, which were motivated by the discovery of the first diamondiferous kimberlites in Yakutia (Siberian craton, NE Russia). All the ADP magmatic bodies were discovered through aeromagnetic surveys, which were preceded by detailed geological surveying and use of the indicator mineral method [4]. Due to the sedimentary cover over the pipes, with a minimum thickness of 30-50 m in the western ADP and a maximum of 150-200 m in the eastern ADP, the application of the indicator mineral method alone cannot provide information about the source location.
Any prospective area within the ADP identified by mineral indicator sampling should be covered by high-resolution (1:10000-1:5000) aeromagnetic surveys, followed by detailed ground magnetic surveys, which can identify local geophysical or "pipe-like" anomalies. These anomalies are potential kimberlite targets and should be investigated further by Any prospective area within the ADP identified by mineral indicator sampling should be covered by high-resolution (1:10000-1:5000) aeromagnetic surveys, followed by detailed ground magnetic surveys, which can identify local geophysical or "pipe-like" anomalies. These anomalies are potential kimberlite targets and should be investigated further by drilling. First, prospecting for kimberlites using local magnetic anomalies (LMAs) yielded fairly good results, and approximately 10% of drilled targets yielded pipes [5]. For example, test drilling of 58 pipe-like anomalies within the ADP Verhotina field resulted in the discovery of eight magmatic pipes, including six olivine melilitites and two kimberlites [4]. However, the majority of pipe-like anomalies identified through aeromagnetic surveys in the 1970s-1990s have already been tested [6]. Therefore, new detailed prospecting activity within this region is required.
However, the interpretation of geophysical data is complicated by the fact that the physical properties of the ADP kimberlites (density, electrical conductivity and magnetization) differ little from those of the country rocks [4,7]; i.e., not every pipe-like anomaly is a real magmatic pipe. An additional problem is that the center of the pipe-like anomaly may not match the geometric center of the real pipe. This problem could imply that some test drillings during the 1970s-1990s were outside of pipes and a certain number of magmatic bodies were missed. For example, the center of the LMA is displaced from the geometric center of the V. Grib pipe by 200 m to the east [4]. The first test drilling in the area However, the interpretation of geophysical data is complicated by the fact that the physical properties of the ADP kimberlites (density, electrical conductivity and magnetization) differ little from those of the country rocks [4,7]; i.e., not every pipe-like anomaly is a real magmatic pipe. An additional problem is that the center of the pipe-like anomaly may not match the geometric center of the real pipe. This problem could imply that some test drillings during the 1970s-1990s were outside of pipes and a certain number of magmatic bodies were missed. For example, the center of the LMA is displaced from the geometric center of the V. Grib pipe by 200 m to the east [4]. The first test drilling in the area of the V. Grib pipe was in 1986 (now, it is clearly known to have been outside of the pipe), whereas kimberlite was discovered only in 1996 [4]. Another problem for potential pipe identification is that the majority of the ADP magmatic bodies include craters with widths varying from 20-40 m to 200-300 m. The craters consist of various volcaniclastic (tuff, tuff breccia, xeno-tuff breccia); volcaniclastic-sedimentary (sandstone with magmatic material); and sedimentary (sandstone) rocks. The upper levels of the craters can be represented by reddish-brown sandstones without any magmatic material, which are similar to the The KL-01 pipe is located in the southern part of the "K" area. The pipe was identified as an anomaly of 12-13 nT in the local magnetic field by a ground magnetic survey ( Figure  3). The pipe was sampled in three boreholes located in the central (no. 1), northern (no. 2) and southern (no. 3) parts of the anomaly to depths of 150 and 300 m. The pipe intrudes into Vendian sedimentary rocks and is covered by middle Carboniferous, Permian and Cenozoic sedimentary rocks, with a total thickness of 80 m. The KL-01 pipe is located in the southern part of the "K" area. The pipe was identified as an anomaly of 12-13 nT in the local magnetic field by a ground magnetic survey ( Figure 3). The pipe was sampled in three boreholes located in the central (no. 1), northern (no. 2) and southern (no. 3) parts of the anomaly to depths of 150 and 300 m. The pipe intrudes into Vendian sedimentary rocks and is covered by middle Carboniferous, Permian and Cenozoic sedimentary rocks, with a total thickness of 80 m.

Overview of the Composition of the ADP Magmatic Rocks
Kimberlites are the predominant rock type in the Zolotitsa field and a component of the Kepino, Verhotina and Mela fields. Defining three main groups of ADP kimberlites is generally accepted [13,14]. The first group contains the moderate-to-high-titanium (TiO 2 from~2 to >3 wt. %) kimberlites of the Kepino field. These kimberlites are the most enriched in high field strength elements (HFSEs-Nb, Zr and Hf) and light rare earth elements (LREEs) and in terms of Nd, Pb and Sr isotope compositions they are close to Group I kimberlites of southern Africa [15]. The main KIMs are magnesium ilmenite, abundant pyrope and chromium diopside and rare chromium spinel [11].
The second group is represented by low-titanium (TiO 2 < 1 wt. %) kimberlites of the Zolotitsa field. These kimberlites have lower HFSE (Nb, Zr, and Hf) and LREE contents and are close to the Group II kimberlites of southern Africa [15]. The Zolotitsa field kimberlites contain chromium spinel as the dominant KIM, with minor pyrope and chromium diopside and rare magnesium ilmenite [9,11,16].
The third group consists of the moderate-titanium (TiO 2 = 0.8-2 wt. %) kimberlites of the V. Grib pipe. They are transitional between the Zolotitsa and Kepino field kimberlite compositions in terms of HFSE and LREE [13,14]. The V. Grib kimberlites have abundant magnesium ilmenite, pyrope and chromium diopside with minor chromium spinel as KIMs.
The Mela "kimberlites" in fact have compositions that are transitional between kimberlite and carbonatite (SiO 2 = 15-28 wt. %; MgO = 8-24 wt. %; CaO = 12-34 wt. %). They are enriched in LREEs, Sr and Ba compared to other ADP kimberlites. Information on the presence of KIMs is almost absent in the published literature. Some authors indicate the presence of Mn-ilmenite [17] and rare almandine [10].
Six of the Zolotitsa kimberlites (i.e., the Lomonosov mine) and the V. Grib kimberlite pipe are rich in diamonds and are economically exploitable. The other ADP kimberlites are diamond-poor/free and uneconomic.
Olivine melilitites/picrites are components of the Kepino, Izhmozero and Verhotina fields. The nomenclature of these rocks is debatable. The proponents of the term "picrite" [18,19] indicate that no fresh melilite has ever been found in these rocks, whereas the proponents of the term "melilitites" [9,11] report abundant melilite lithoclasts. All authors define two main varieties of these rocks. The first variety combines mica-poor alkaline picrites [19] or olivine melilitites of Group 1 [9] of the Kepino field, and the second variety combines micaceous picrites [19] or olivine melilitites of Group 2 [9] of the Verhotina and Izhmozero fields. The rocks of the first variety contain more TiO 2 (3.1-3.7 wt. %), FeO (12-15 wt. %) and Cr (1600-2120 ppm) than those of the second variety (TiO 2 = 0.4-1.4 wt. %; FeO = 4-10 wt. %; Cr = 490-930 ppm). Types of minerals in heavy mineral concentrates differ for different fields and consist of magnesium ilmenite, pyrope, chromium diopside and chromium spinel in various proportions for the Kepino and Verhotina fields and clinopyroxene and spinel for the Izhmozero field (Table S1). Rare diamond crystals have been found in half of the pipes but not on an industrial scale.

Samples
In this study, I provide major and trace element data for 35 sandstone samples from the KL-01 pipe, including 10 samples from borehole-1 (BRH-1) at depths of 125-239 m and 25 samples from borehole-2 (BRH-2) at depths of 85-150 m. For comparison, I also provide the results for two samples of Vendian sandstones sampled near the KL-01 pipe, 30 samples from the crater of the V. Grib kimberlite pipe and three samples from the craters of the olivine melilitite/picrite Suksoma pipe and the Pobeda and Yurasskaya kimberlite pipes in the Kepino field. Note that according to the published data [10,12,21], the Pobeda kimberlite pipe has no crater, but crater sediments have been identified within the boundary of the pipe with Vendian sediments ( Figure S2 in Supplementary Material). The sample studied here is far from typical kimberlite or kimberlite xeno-tuff breccia in terms of its mineralogy and major and trace element compositions. Therefore, I describe this sample as a relic of an eroded crater.
Samples of the KL-01 pipe and Vendian sandstones were recovered from the core during 2017-2018 field work on the borehole drilling program organized by the Proex Service. The samples of the V. Grib kimberlite pipe crater were recovered from the open pit in 2015 by the Arkhangelskgeoldobycha (currently AGD Diamonds) geologist. Samples of the crater parts of the Kepino magmatic pipes were taken in 2015 from the Arkhangelskgeoldobycha core collection, obtained by borehole drilling programs in the 1980s-2000s.

Analytical Techniques
All analytical work was performed in the Analytical Center for Multi-Element and Isotope Research at the Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science (IGM SB RAS), Novosibirsk.
Billets of~25 mm × 45 mm × 10 mm were cut with a diamond blade, planed on one side and mounted with epoxy on standard~27 mm × 47 mm petrographic carrier glass. To assess mineral content, microtexture, structure and fabric, covered thin sections were examined by backscattered electron imaging using a Tescan MIRA 3 LMU scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Tescan) coupled with an INCA energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) microanalysis system 450 with a liquid nitrogen-free large area EDS X-Max-80 silicon drift detector (Oxford Instruments). To evaluate the bulk rock major and trace element contents, the samples were powdered using tungsten-carbide. Silicate analysis for 15 major oxides was carried out on an ARL-9900-XP X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. The relative standard deviations were <1 wt. % for SiO 2 , FeO and TiO 2 ; 1.1-1.7 for Al 2 O 3 , MgO and TiO 2 ; 2.5 wt. % for Cr 2 O 3 ; and 3.4-3.5 wt. % for MnO, Na 2 O and K 2 O. The contents of 32 trace elements were analyzed on a high-resolution ELEMENT (Finnigan Mat) inductively coupled plasma (ICP) mass spectrometer with a U-5000AT pulverizer ultrasound, following the method elaborated by the IGM SB RAS [22]. The relative standard deviation of the analysis amounted to 2-5% on average [22]. To identify the rock-forming minerals and their proportions, X-ray diffractometry on an automatic piston DRON-4 diffractometer equipped with a graphite monochromator (CuK radiation, voltage of 40 kV, current of 24 mA) was used. The detection limit of the minerals was 1 vol. %. To diagnose the group of clay minerals, samples were saturated with ethylene glycol. To define smectites as dioctahedral (montmorillonite group) or trioctahedral (saponite group), the values of d 060 were used (d 060 = 1.453-1.503 Å for dioctahedral and d 060 = 1.503-1.543 Å for trioctahedral varieties).  Three hundred kg of KL-01 pipe rocks, including 200 kg from borehole 1 and 100 kg  from borehole 2, were crushed and then processed via magnetic and heavy liquid separation.  The mineral concentrates were handpicked for KIMs under a binocular microscope. Two  fresh olivine grains were picked directly from the greenish segregations in sample KL01-2-144.3. In total, 328 mineral grains were picked and subjected to morphological study and microprobe analysis. The KIM morphology was studied using a MIRA 3 LMU (Tescan, Ltd.) SEM, equipped with an INCA Energy 450 X-Max-80 EDS (Oxford Instruments, Ltd.). Then, the minerals were mounted in epoxy, polished and coated with carbon. The major element compositions of the minerals were measured using a JEOL JXA-8100 electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA). The analytical conditions were a 20-kV accelerating voltage and a 50-nA beam current, with a beam size of 1 µm [23,24]. In-house natural mineral IGM SB RAS standards were used for calibration. Relative standard deviations were within 1.5%. Data were acquired for 10 s on-peak as well as 10 s on either side of the background; ZAF correction was applied. Detection limits were <0.05 wt. % for all elements analyzed, including 0.01 wt. % for Cr and Mn, 0.02 wt. % for Ti and Na, and 0.05 wt. % for K. Based on the results of the microprobe analysis, 62 grains were identified as potential KIMs, including 32 garnets, 16 chromium spinels, eight magnesian ilmenites, two olivines and four chromium diopsides, and 266 garnet grains were identified from non-mantle lithologies. In situ trace element analyses in pyropes were carried out using a Thermo Scientific XSeries 2 ICP mass spectrometer using a Nd:YAG LaserProbe system (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) at the Analytical Center of Novosibirsk State University. Reference samples SRM NIST 612 and NIST 614 were used for calibration of instrument parameters. Two analyses of the NIST 612 standard were completed before and after analysis of ten samples to correct for machine drift. The laser was operated at 20 Hz with a pulse energy of 12 mJ cm 2 and a beam size of 50 µm. Helium was used as the carrier gas. The acquisition times were 90 s for the background and 60 s for the signal. The detection limits were within 0.1-0.2 ppm for elements with lighter mass (Sc-Sr), and 0.01 ppm for elements with masses heavier than that of Sr. The low concentrations (~0.8 ppm) of SRM NIST 614 were analyzed three times as unknowns and gave <10% deviation from recommended values [25] for most of the elements except Sc, Ti, Ni and Rb, which were within 25%. The EPMA-determined Ca concentrations were used as internal standards.

Petrography
Photographs of the representative samples studied here are presented in Figure 4. The Vendian sandstones are reddish-brown, poorly cemented rocks composed mostly of quartz with accessory K-feldspar, zircon, hematite and anatase and aggregates of kaolinite ( Figure 4A).
The KL-01 pipe is composed of reddish-brown sandstones that contain oval greenish segregations up to 2 cm in size, rare massive veins and oval-to-elongated formations up to 7 cm in size ( Figure 4B Figure 5A). The main rock-forming minerals of the sandstones are quartz and K-feldspar with frequent accessory minerals such as zircon, rutile, brookite/anatase, ilmenite, biotite, barite, hematite, magnetite, Ti-magnetite and rare amphibole, apatite, monazite and muscovite and sporadic perovskite and sulfides (pyrite, Co-Fe sulfide; Figure 6A). The groundmass in sandstones is composed of mixtures of the same minerals with smaller sizes and contains abundant segregations of secondary phases such as calcite, chlorite, dolomite, kaolinite and rare illite. The MM is present mostly as dioctahedral smectite (montmorillonite), rarely as trioctahedral smectite (saponite) and   The crater sediments of the melilitite/picrite Suksoma pipe (Kepino field) are composed of well-cemented reddish-brown sandstone that contains ~50 vol. % MM in the form of oval greenish segregations up to 1.5 cm in size ( Figure 4P). The sandstone is composed of dominant quartz and subordinate K-feldspar with frequent accessory minerals such as mica, hematite, zircon and rare amphibole. The secondary phases are predominant calcite and rare chlorite, dolomite and barite. The MM is present as saponite and can contain segregations of calcite, dolomite and chlorite. Small (up to 30 μm) grains of chromium spinel are identified within most MM segregations ( Figure 6D). and Suksoma olivine melilitite/picrite pipe (D). Qz = quarts, kfs = K-feldspar, Sme = smectite, Zr = zircon, Ap = apatite, ilm = ilmenite, kln = kaolinite, dol = dolomite, chr = Cr-spinel. Abbreviations of minerals according to [26].
The crater sediments of the V. Grib kimberlite pipe are present as rock series varying from reddish-brown, almost loose sandstones with no visible MM ( Figure 4K) to poorly cemented sandstones with MM present as chaotic light green segregations up to 2 cm in size (MM < 20 vol. %; Figure 4L,M) to well-cemented dense sandstones containing oval and oval-elongated greenish segregations varying from 20 vol. % ( Figure 4N) to >40 vol. % ( Figure 4O). The volume percentage of MM does not correlate with the depth of the sample because the samples were recovered not from a specific borehole but from the open pit, so the whole series of crater sediment can be present within a similar depth ( Figure 4M-O and Figure 5A). The sandstones are composed of dominant quartz and subordinate K-feldspar, with frequent accessory minerals such as mica, hematite, rutile and rare amphibole and plagioclase. The secondary phases are kaolinite, chlorite, dolomite and rare calcite and illite. The MM is represented by montmorillonite, saponite or a mixture of them in samples with 20 < MM < 40 vol. % and by saponite and rare vermiculite-saponite in the samples with MM > 40 vol. %.
The crater sediments of the melilitite/picrite Suksoma pipe (Kepino field) are composed of well-cemented reddish-brown sandstone that contains~50 vol. % MM in the form of oval greenish segregations up to 1.5 cm in size ( Figure 4P). The sandstone is composed of dominant quartz and subordinate K-feldspar with frequent accessory minerals such as mica, hematite, zircon and rare amphibole. The secondary phases are predominant calcite and rare chlorite, dolomite and barite. The MM is present as saponite and can contain segregations of calcite, dolomite and chlorite. Small (up to 30 µm) grains of chromium spinel are identified within most MM segregations ( Figure 6D).
The crater sediments of the Pobeda and Yurasskaya kimberlite pipes (Kepino field) are well-cemented reddish-brown and brown sandstones with MM < 30 vol. % ( Figure 4Q,R). The sandstones are composed of dominant Qz and subordinate K-feldspar with frequent accessory minerals such as rutile, zircon and hematite and rare mica, magnetite and apatite. The secondary phases are dominant dolomite and rare calcite, chlorite and kaolinite. The MM is represented by saponite with rare segregations of dolomite and chlorite in the sample from the Pobeda pipe and dolomite in the sample from the Yurasskaya pipe.

Major and Trace Element Whole-Rock Geochemistry
The major and trace element compositions of the samples are presented in Table S3.   Table S3). The maximum concentrations of Ni (up to 685 ppm) and Cr (up to 727 ppm) are higher than those of the KL-01 samples.
The crater sediments of Pobeda and Yurasskaya kimberlite pipes (Kepino field) have SiO2 contents varying within the range of 58-61 wt. % and MgO from 5.3 to 10.7 wt. %. The Ni (137-231 ppm) content is within the range of the BRH-2 KL-01 samples, whereas the Cr contents are significantly higher (Cr = 421-575 ppm) and close to those from the V. Grib pipe. On discrimination diagrams, the Kepino samples overlap or are close to the V. Grib pipe samples ( Figures 5 and 7A).  Table S3). The maximum concentrations of Ni (up to 685 ppm) and Cr (up to 727 ppm) are higher than those of the KL-01 samples.
The crater sediments of Pobeda and Yurasskaya kimberlite pipes (Kepino field) have SiO 2 contents varying within the range of 58-61 wt. % and MgO from 5.3 to 10.7 wt. %. The Ni (137-231 ppm) content is within the range of the BRH-2 KL-01 samples, whereas the Cr contents are significantly higher (Cr = 421-575 ppm) and close to those from the V. Grib pipe. On discrimination diagrams, the Kepino samples overlap or are close to the V. Grib pipe samples (Figures 5 and 7A).

Morphology of Kimberlite Indicator Minerals from the KL01 Pipe
Garnets are represented by grains with elongated angular shapes ( Figure 8A,C-E) or with relics of a rhombic dodecahedral habit ( Figure 8B); they are various shades of red (light red, deep red and purple-red) and range in size from 1 to 2 mm. The surfaces of the grains can be smooth (in some cases, apparently as a result of grain cleavage) with relics of a pyramidal shingle-like relief ( Figure 8A) or have signs of melting, recognized by microrelief forming minute waves and humps ( Figure 8B). Three grains have rare signs of chemically corroded morphology with the formation of negative forms such as etching channels ( Figure 8C) and positive forms such as "drop-like" relief ( Figure 8D,E). Magnesium ilmenite grains are oval or oval-elongated and 1-2 mm in size with rough relief and have no clear pyramidal shingle-like forms ( Figure 8F). Chromium spinel is represented by grains up to 1 mm in size, mostly with relic octahedral habit, and having rough relief around the smooth surfaces of octahedron faces ( Figure 8G). A minor number of grains do not preserve any clear crystallographic forms and have overall rough relief. Chromium diopside and olivine grains are up to 1 mm in size and have clear pyramidal shingle-like microrelief formed by minute "drops" and "tubercles" (Figure 8H,I).

Morphology of Kimberlite Indicator Minerals from the KL01 Pipe
Garnets are represented by grains with elongated angular shapes ( Figure 8A,C-E) or with relics of a rhombic dodecahedral habit ( Figure 8B); they are various shades of red (light red, deep red and purple-red) and range in size from 1 to 2 mm. The surfaces of the grains can be smooth (in some cases, apparently as a result of grain cleavage) with relics of a pyramidal shingle-like relief ( Figure 8A) or have signs of melting, recognized by microrelief forming minute waves and humps ( Figure 8B). Three grains have rare signs of chemically corroded morphology with the formation of negative forms such as etching channels ( Figure 8C) and positive forms such as "drop-like" relief ( Figures 8D,E). Magnesium ilmenite grains are oval or oval-elongated and 1-2 mm in size with rough relief and have no clear pyramidal shingle-like forms ( Figure 8F). Chromium spinel is represented by grains up to 1 mm in size, mostly with relic octahedral habit, and having rough relief around the smooth surfaces of octahedron faces ( Figure 8G). A minor number of grains do not preserve any clear crystallographic forms and have overall rough relief. Chromium diopside and olivine grains are up to 1 mm in size and have clear pyramidal shingle-like microrelief formed by minute "drops" and "tubercles" (Figures 8H,I).

Geochemistry of Kimberlite Indicator Minerals from the KL01 Pipe
The major and trace element compositions of the KIMs are presented in Table S4 in Supplementary Material.

Geochemistry of Kimberlite Indicator Minerals from the KL01 Pipe
The major and trace element compositions of the KIMs are presented in Table S4 in Supplementary Material. , which could be of eclogitic paragenesis [28]. The compositions of these garnets match those from the V. Grib pipe coarse-grained eclogites ( [29]; Figure S3 in Supplementary Material).
Following the classification scheme outlined by [30], all the pyropes match the field of lherzolite garnets ( Figure 9A). Based on their C1 [31] chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REEn) patterns as well as their Cr 2 O 3 , Zr and Y contents, pyropes can be classified into five principal groups.
Following the classification scheme outlined by [30], all the pyropes match the field of lherzolite garnets ( Figure 9A). Based on their C1 [31] chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REEn) patterns as well as their Cr2O3, Zr and Y contents, pyropes can be classified into five principal groups.
The fourth group (2 grains; 9%) is represented by pyropes that have "humped" REE patterns with positive slopes from LREEs to MREEs (Smn/Lan = 16 and 48), peaks at Eu (7 × chondritic) or Gd (15 × chondritic), and negative slopes from MREEs to HREEs with troughs at Er (5 and 10 × chondritic) and positive slopes from Er to Lu (7 and 14 × chondritic; Figure 10D). Compared to other groups, these pyropes have higher Hfn/Lun ratios (0.8 and 1) and lower Y/Zr ratios (0.3). The pyropes have the highest contents of Cr2O3 (7.5 and 11.4 wt. %) and TiO2 (0.35 and 0.37 wt. %) compared to other groups. The concentrations of Ni are 32 and 68 ppm, which corresponds to an estimated T of 904 °C and 1138 °C.
The garnet of the fifth group (one grain; 5%) has a nearly sinusoidal REE pattern ( Figure 10D). The pyrope is low in Y (3 ppm) and Zr (12 ppm) with a Y/Zr ratio of 0.3, similar to garnets with humped REE patterns but has a lower Hfn/Lun ratio (0.2). The pyrope has low Cr2O3 (2.9 wt. %) and minor TiO2 (0.09 wt. %) contents. The concentration of Ni is 11 ppm, which corresponds to an estimated T of 675 °C.
The fourth group (2 grains; 9%) is represented by pyropes that have "humped" REE patterns with positive slopes from LREEs to MREEs (Sm n /La n = 16 and 48), peaks at Eu (7 × chondritic) or Gd (15 × chondritic), and negative slopes from MREEs to HREEs with troughs at Er (5 and 10 × chondritic) and positive slopes from Er to Lu (7 and 14 × chondritic; Figure 10D). Compared to other groups, these pyropes have higher Hf n /Lu n ratios (0.8 and 1) and lower Y/Zr ratios (0.3). The pyropes have the highest contents of Cr 2 O 3 (7.5 and 11.4 wt. %) and TiO 2 (0.35 and 0.37 wt. %) compared to other groups. The concentrations of Ni are 32 and 68 ppm, which corresponds to an estimated T of 904 • C and 1138 • C.
The garnet of the fifth group (one grain; 5%) has a nearly sinusoidal REE pattern ( Figure 10D). The pyrope is low in Y (3 ppm) and Zr (12 ppm) with a Y/Zr ratio of 0.3, similar to garnets with humped REE patterns but has a lower Hf n /Lu n ratio (0.2). The pyrope has low Cr 2 O 3 (2.9 wt. %) and minor TiO 2 (0.09 wt. %) contents. The concentration of Ni is 11 ppm, which corresponds to an estimated T of 675 • C.
Four grains of clinopyroxene are diopsides with high Cr2O3 contents (0.65-2.05 wt. %) and can be classified as chromium diopside. One grain has Al2O3 (6.1 wt. %) and low Mg# (89.0) and plots in the field of "spinel peridotite and off-craton garnet peridotites" [49] (Figure S5 in Supplementary Material). The other three grains have high Mg# (92.6-94.9), match the field of "on-craton garnet peridotites" and have compositions similar to those from the Lomonosov and Grib kimberlites and garnet peridotites. Based on the Ca/Al ratio, one grain could have been derived from within the diamond stability field, whereas another grain could have been derived from the graphite stability field [50]. None of the grains has a composition suitable for P-T calculation [51,52].
Four grains of clinopyroxene are diopsides with high Cr 2 O 3 contents (0.65-2.05 wt. %) and can be classified as chromium diopside. One grain has Al 2 O 3 (6.1 wt. %) and low Mg# (89.0) and plots in the field of "spinel peridotite and off-craton garnet peridotites" [49] ( Figure S5 in Supplementary Material). The other three grains have high Mg# (92.6-94.9), match the field of "on-craton garnet peridotites" and have compositions similar to those from the Lomonosov and Grib kimberlites and garnet peridotites. Based on the Ca/Al ratio, one grain could have been derived from within the diamond stability field, whereas another grain could have been derived from the graphite stability field [50]. None of the grains has a composition suitable for P-T calculation [51,52].

Smectite Group Minerals as Kimberlite Indicators within the Arkhangelsk Diamondiferous Province
Smectite minerals, including dioctahedral montmorillonite and trioctahedral saponite, are common secondary phases in kimberlites [53] and one of the dominant components in kimberlite weathering [54][55][56]. Smectite minerals found within the ADP are limited to three options: (1) within the crater and diatreme parts of magmatic pipes; (2) in the Ven-dian sandstones bordering the kimberlite pipes; and (3) within the middle Carboniferous sandstones of the Urzuga Formation.
Saponite is the most abundant smectite mineral in the ADP magmatic pipes. It is always present within the crater sediments of kimberlite and melilitite/picrite pipes and a typical component of their diatreme xeno-tuff breccias. In the V. Grib kimberlite pipe, saponite is identified within the whole spectra of crater sediments, as well as within the xeno-tuff breccia diatreme zone and near the level of the kimberlite crater/diatreme contact [4], whereas diatreme kimberlite is rich in serpentine, with no smectite minerals. In the V. Grib pipe crater sediments, saponite is present mostly in the form of oval segregations, usually interpreted as pseudomorphs after olivine grains, veins and shapeless chaotic formations, as well as in the groundmass together with carbonate and hydromica; rare saponite replaces pyrope grains [4]. In the Arkhangelskaya kimberlite pipe, saponite is ubiquitously abundant. It forms oval segregations and veins in the crater sediments, intensively replaces KIM xenocrysts and the constituent minerals of mantle xenoliths and is the main mineral in the groundmass of kimberlite and kimberlite itself [12]. The saponite modes vary within the range of 1-60 vol. % in crater sediments and 60-90 vol. % in diatreme kimberlite, whereas serpentine is minor in the diatreme part (<40 vol. %) and completely absent in the crater part [12]. Unusual quartz grains have also been documented [55] in the crater parts and upper levels of the ADP kimberlite pipes. This quartz is partly or fully altered to saponite, which is the main difference from quartz in the country rocks, and is called "pipe quartz" [55,56].
Montmorillonite is a much less common smectite mineral in the ADP magmatic pipes. It, together with hydromica, has previously been documented in the depth range of 20-70 m within the crater sediments of the Arkhangelskaya kimberlite pipe [12,55] and near the contact of the crater with the overlying Paleozoic sediments in the Karpinskogo-2 pipes [57]. Our study also shows the presence of montmorillonite in the V. Grib pipe crater sandstones, which contain 20 < MM < 40 vol. %, and the lack of montmorillonite in the studied crater samples of the Kepino kimberlites.
The ubiquitous formation of smectite minerals in the ADP magmatic pipes, especially kimberlites, is primarily associated with the long-term influence of hydrothermal processes, which were promoted by the specific composition of the country rock sandstones, which are weakly cemented and therefore easily permeated by groundwater [12,56,58]. The crater sediments of the ADP kimberlites are reddish-brown or rusty colored and contain abundant sandstone components and very low numbers of KIMs and smectite minerals as the main phases found in altered MM. The rocks change dramatically in the transitional zone from the crater to the diatreme part, near 160 and 170-180 m from the surface for Arkhangelskaya [12] and V. Grib (our data) kimberlite pipes, respectively. The rocks become gray, greenish-gray and green colored with a gradually decreasing and completely disappearing sandstone component, an increasing number of unaltered KIMs and the appearance of serpentine as subordinate to smectite (for the Arkhangelskaya pipe) or as the main secondary mineral (for the V. Grib pipe) in kimberlite. These differences can also indicate oxidizing conditions for crater sediments, favorable conditions for smectite formation and reducing conditions for diatreme rocks [12].
Smectite minerals have also been previously observed within the country rock Vendian sandstones, which are bordered by kimberlite pipes [59]. Smectites form numerous subhorizontal veins in sandstone cracks and are traced within a maximum of five meters from the border with the pipe [59]. However, smectite segregations are also documented in the form of rare vertical veins in the Vendian sandstones in boreholes at distances of 20 m and 100 m from the edge of the Arkhangelskaya pipe [59].
Finally, smectite minerals are found within the middle Carboniferous sandstones of the Urzuga Formation [12,57,59], which are regarded as the main secondary deposits for the ADP KIMs and diamonds. These sandstones cover three quarters of the ADP area and unconformably overlie the Vendian rocks; they are also observed within the sediments covering the majority of pipes [57]. Smectites have been documented to form oval segregations within the five-meter lower layer of Urzuga sandstones that cover pipes and chaotic fine-grained segregations outside of pipes [59]. The concentrations of KIMs in the Urzuga sandstones located within 1 km outside of kimberlite pipes are well established to be much higher for pipes with no crater part than for pipes with preserved craters [57]. Additionally, the numbers of KIMs found in the secondary deposits primarily depend on the type and thickness of rocks overlying the pipe and secondarily on the initial concentrations of KIMs in the pipe. The majority of the ADP kimberlites and all olivine melilitites/picrites contain low numbers of KIMs, with the exception of the highdiamondiferous V. Grib kimberlite and several low-diamondiferous Kepino kimberlites (e.g., pipes no. 688 and no. 697, Tsnigri-Arkhangelskaya and Soloha [21]). In this case, the identification of smectite minerals, especially saponite, together with even one KIM grain that has a surface with no signs of mechanical abrasion (usually, the location of such grains is limited to within 1-2 km from the pipe) is proposed for use as one of the methods of identifying kimberlite pipes within the region [56,60].
The sandstones of the KL-01 pipe contain smectites mostly in the form of oval segregations that are 0.2-2 cm in size. Their modes are maximum in the depth ranges of 170-250 m for BRH-1 (10 vol. %) and 140-150 m for BRH-2 (30 vol. %). The smectite distribution within the rocks is not random, but few of them take the form of veins. Additionally, the thicknesses of sandstones that contain smectite segregations vary within the depth range of 70-80 m in the two boreholes. These observations demonstrate that the KL-01 sandstones are unlikely to represent an area of country rock sandstones on the border with the pipe or secondary deposits. Similar to sandstones composing the crater parts of ADP pipes, the majority of oval greenish smectite formations can be interpreted as pseudomorphs after constituent minerals of some magmatic rocks. The alteration of quartz grains to smectites is possible, but only for pseudomorphs with sizes similar to those of sandstone quartz (<1 mm). Additionally, there are smectite segregations up to seven cm in size (e.g., sample KL01-2-144.3, Figure 4J), from which two fresh high-Mg olivine grains were hand-picked, which can also indicate alteration of mantle xenoliths. The sandstones of the KL-01 pipe can be proposed to represent the crater part of a pipe. These sandstones may be assumed to be predominantly components of the upper level of the crater if they are analogous to the distribution of montmorillonite in the craters of the ADP pipes. If this is true, the lower boundary of the crater may be deeper than 300 m from the surface, and the thickness is at least 160 m.

Evaluation of the Type of Magmatic Material Admixture in the KL-01 Pipe
An attempt to identify the type of MM in the KL-01 sandstones is made in this section. Subsequently, a model of binary mixing of the compositions of Vendian sandstones with known ADP magmatic rocks is used. The end-members of mixing are chosen based on the main geochemical differences among ADP magmatic rocks, as described in Section 3 (Table S6). To exclude crustal contamination the average compositions of hypabyssal samples of the ADP magmatic rocks were used [61][62][63].
The modeling based on the correlations of major oxides ( Figure 13A) or the combination of major oxides with trace elements ( Figure 13B) or with their ratios ( Figure 13C) shows that the mixing trends mostly overlap or are close to each other. The V. Grib pipe and the KL-01 sandstones simultaneously match different types of rocks, but the V. Grib pipe sandstones with MM > 40 vol. % sometimes match the V. Grib kimberlite mixing trend. To obtain more clarity, a mixing model based on the correlation of a limited set of elements and ratios, namely, La/Yb, Zr/Nb and Ni, which are very specific for the ADP magmatic rocks, and a step-by-step approach is proposed.

Step 1. Excluding the Admixture of Carbonatite and Carbonatized Kimberlite Component
These types of rocks can be excluded as possible candidates for MM merely by using the correlation of La/Yb with Ni content ( Figure 14A). The addition of 10 vol. % carbonatite to the calculation gives a La/Yb ratio two to three times higher than those of other ADP magmatic rocks, and Ni does not exceed 17 ppm. The addition of a greater carbonatite component leads to an increase in the ratio of La/Yb to Ni from a maximum of 1.2 to 2 at Ni variations of 10-135 ppm, whereas the same ratio for other ADP magmatic rocks decreases from 0.8 to 0.02 with increasing addition of the MM component. The trend of mixing with carbonatized kimberlite occupies a transitional position between carbonatite and other ADP magmatic rocks ( Figure 14A) but differs from the latter due to the higher ratios of La/Yb to Ni, varying from 0.4 to 0.2 at Ni contents of 28-485 ppm.   (Table S6).

Step 2. Excluding the Admixture of the Basalt Component
The trend of mixing with the basalt component is always near or overlaps those of the ADP kimberlites and melilitites/picrites ( Figure 13) but differs by showing significantly smaller ranges of variations for all components, especially MgO, Ni and Cr, and Zr/Nb ratios. The best way to exclude the admixture of the basalt component is to use the value of Ni content. If the Ni content is higher than the maximum Ni concentration in basalts, i.e., >90 ppm, and the volume percentage of the sandstone component is greater than that of the MM in the studied rocks, then the basalt admixture can be ruled out.
Step 3. Excluding the Admixture of Micaceous Picrite/Olivine Melilitite of the Group 2 Component.
The trend of mixing with this type of rock is close to those with the Zolotitsa and V. Grib kimberlites (Figures 13 and 14B), where the main difference from the latter lies in different values of the concentrations of one or another element or ratio with the same addition of the MM component. For example, the addition of 40 and 60 vol. % micaceous picrites/olivine melilitites of the Group 2 component into the calculations gives Zr/Nb ratios and Ni contents equal to the addition of 20 and 30 vol. % Zolotitsa or V. Grib kimberlite components, respectively. Therefore, the juxtaposition of data on MM modes with the  (Table S6).

Step 2. Excluding the Admixture of the Basalt Component
The trend of mixing with the basalt component is always near or overlaps those of the ADP kimberlites and melilitites/picrites ( Figure 13) but differs by showing significantly smaller ranges of variations for all components, especially MgO, Ni and Cr, and Zr/Nb ratios. The best way to exclude the admixture of the basalt component is to use the value of Ni content. If the Ni content is higher than the maximum Ni concentration in basalts, i.e., >90 ppm, and the volume percentage of the sandstone component is greater than that of the MM in the studied rocks, then the basalt admixture can be ruled out.
Step 3. Excluding the Admixture of Micaceous Picrite/Olivine Melilitite of the Group 2 Component The trend of mixing with this type of rock is close to those with the Zolotitsa and V. Grib kimberlites (Figures 13 and 14B), where the main difference from the latter lies in different values of the concentrations of one or another element or ratio with the same addition of the MM component. For example, the addition of 40 and 60 vol. % micaceous picrites/olivine melilitites of the Group 2 component into the calculations gives Zr/Nb ratios and Ni contents equal to the addition of 20 and 30 vol. % Zolotitsa or V. Grib kimberlite components, respectively. Therefore, the juxtaposition of data on MM modes with the Ni content and the Zr/Nb ratio is the best way to exclude the micaceous picrites/olivine melilitites of Group 2 as the MM admixture; i.e., if the volume percentage of MM in the studied rocks is significantly lower (by 20-30 vol. %) than those indicated in the Zr/Nb versus Ni diagram, this type of rock can be ruled out as an MM admixture. Ni content and the Zr/Nb ratio is the best way to exclude the micaceous picrites/olivine melilitites of Group 2 as the MM admixture; i.e., if the volume percentage of MM in the studied rocks is significantly lower (by 20-30 vol. %) than those indicated in the Zr/Nb versus Ni diagram, this type of rock can be ruled out as an MM admixture. Step 4. Choosing the Type of MM Admixture If the types of ADP magmatic rocks described above as MM admixtures have been ruled out in steps 1-3, using the Zr/Nb values and Ni contents is the only right way to identify the type of MM admixture ( Figure 14B). The mixing trends allow us to identify the area of mixing with the kimberlite component and to make an assumption about the type of ADP kimberlite (Kepino, Zolotitsa or V. Grib kimberlites) added to the mixture. However, it is impossible to differentiate the Kepino kimberlite and mica-poor picrites/olivine melilitites of Group 1 as MM admixtures. Although these rocks have clear differences in Mg# (0.82 in kimberlite versus 0.74 in picrite/olivine melilitite), La/Yb ratios (48 versus 22) and SiO2 (36.7 versus 42.6 wt. %) and FeO (9.6 versus 13.4 wt. %) contents, the other geochemical features are similar. The mixing trends based on Mg#, SiO2 and FeO do not provide any clarity due to the significant influence of the sandstone component in the calculations [61][62][63]. Thus, one can only assume in favor of one or another type of rock as the MM admixture, for example, according to the type of the most common mantle mineral from the heavy fraction; if spinel group minerals prevail, then the MM admixture can Step 4. Choosing the Type of MM Admixture If the types of ADP magmatic rocks described above as MM admixtures have been ruled out in steps 1-3, using the Zr/Nb values and Ni contents is the only right way to identify the type of MM admixture ( Figure 14B). The mixing trends allow us to identify the area of mixing with the kimberlite component and to make an assumption about the type of ADP kimberlite (Kepino, Zolotitsa or V. Grib kimberlites) added to the mixture. However, it is impossible to differentiate the Kepino kimberlite and mica-poor picrites/olivine melilitites of Group 1 as MM admixtures. Although these rocks have clear differences in Mg# (0.82 in kimberlite versus 0.74 in picrite/olivine melilitite), La/Yb ratios (48 versus 22) and SiO 2 (36.7 versus 42.6 wt. %) and FeO (9.6 versus 13.4 wt. %) contents, the other geochemical features are similar. The mixing trends based on Mg#, SiO 2 and FeO do not provide any clarity due to the significant influence of the sandstone component in the calculations [61][62][63]. Thus, one can only assume in favor of one or another type of rock as the MM admixture, for example, according to the type of the most common mantle mineral from the heavy fraction; if spinel group minerals prevail, then the MM admixture can be defined as predominantly picrite/olivine melilitite; if pyrope and Mg-ilmenite dominate, then the MM is kimberlite.

Model Verification using the Natural Samples
In the Zr/Nb versus Ni diagram, the composition of sandstone from the crater of the Suksoma pipe clearly matches the calculated mixing trend to overlap with the MM modes (~50 vol. %; Figure 14B). The sandstone compositions in the crater parts of the Kepino kimberlites match the area near the calculated mixing trend with mica-poor picrites/olivine melilitites of Group 1, confirming the geochemical similarities and the impossibility of differentiating these types of rocks as the MM component. The verification of the proposed model shows that the type of MM in the ADP sandstones can be identified only for the samples that contain > 20 vol. % MM. The compositions of sandstones that contain < 20 vol. % MM cannot provide any information about the type of MM admixture but can be used to distinguish them from the middle Carboniferous sandstones of the Urzuga Formation, which is of tremendous importance when test drilling targets within the ADP. The Zr/Nb ratios vary within a wide range of values from 12 to 87, whereas Ni does not exceed 20 ppm in the Urzuga sandstones ( Figure 14B). The Cr contents in the Urzuga sandstones also have a wide range from 7 to 130 ppm, and the maximum values are close to those in the sandstones from the V. Grib and Suksoma pipes, which contain MM > 20 vol. % and 50 vol. %, respectively ( Figure 14C). Therefore, distinguishing any sandstones with MM admixtures from the Urzuga suite cannot be done by using the Cr contents. The fact that the data on Cr contents calculated in the model and in real ADP crater samples do not coincide should also be considered. Additionally, the set of V. Grib pipe crater samples with MM < 20 vol. % have high Cr contents (190-280 ppm), which are not correlated with MM modes, Ni contents or Zr/Nb ratios ( Figure 14C). The V. Grib pipe crater sandstones with 20 < MM < 40 vol. % and MM > 40 vol. % show positive correlations of Ni and Cr, whereas the KL-01 samples do not, and this observation cannot be ignored. One of the explanations for the low chromium contents of the KL-01 samples may be the extremely low numbers of KIMs in the samples. All grains of KIMs recovered from the sandstones of the KL-01 pipe have primary magmatic surfaces with no signs of mechanical or intense chemical abrasions and therefore can be interpreted as fragments of mantle rocks sampled and transported by the KL-01 pipe. Thus, the interpretation of the KIMs can provide some information about the composition and thermal state of the lithospheric mantle beneath the KL-01 pipe.

Thermal State of the Lithospheric Mantle
Based on the available data obtained from the KL-01 pipe KIMs, there are two ways to obtain information about the thermal state of the lithospheric mantle: (1) to project the equilibrium T Ni for pyropes onto the "average" ADP geotherm and (2) to calculate the pressure parameter for pyrope using the method of [35], assuming that pyropes were in equilibrium with coexisting chromite ( Figure 15A). Previous studies on the thermal state of the ADP lithospheric mantle [16,32,33,64] show that the geotherm estimates are mostly between 35 and 40 mW/m 2 at pressures of 40-75 kbar and 37-40 mW/m 2 (up to 45 mW/m 2 in [64]) at pressures of 20-40 kbar. Projecting the T Ni for the KL-01 pyropes onto the 37 mW/m 2 heat flow and considering the possible range of variations in the heat flux values at the pressure ranges indicated above ( Figure 15B) shows that four pyrope grains (19% of the total lherzolite population) could have originated from the diamond stability field at depths of 150-190 km; two grains (9.5%) from near the graphite-diamond stability field boundary at~120 km; and 15 grains (71.5%) from the graphite stability field at depths ranging from 60-100 km. The values of estimated P-T parameters for pyropes obtained by the method of [35] mostly match the area of possible P-T variations, with the exceptions of pyropes equilibrated at T > 1100 • C ( Figure 15B). The lower boundary of the sampled lithospheric mantle can be concluded to lie in the depth range of 175-190 km with a diamond window width of 55-70 km. equilibrium with coexisting chromite ( Figure 15A). Previous studies on the thermal state of the ADP lithospheric mantle [16,32,33,64] show that the geotherm estimates are mostly between 35 and 40 mW/m 2 at pressures of 40-75 kbar and 37-40 mW/m 2 (up to 45 mW/m 2 in [64]) at pressures of 20-40 kbar. Projecting the TNi for the KL-01 pyropes onto the 37 mW/m 2 heat flow and considering the possible range of variations in the heat flux values at the pressure ranges indicated above ( Figure 15B) shows that four pyrope grains (19% of the total lherzolite population) could have originated from the diamond stability field at depths of 150-190 km; two grains (9.5%) from near the graphite-diamond stability field boundary at ~120 km; and 15 grains (71.5%) from the graphite stability field at depths ranging from 60-100 km. The values of estimated P-T parameters for pyropes obtained by the method of [35] mostly match the area of possible P-T variations, with the exceptions of pyropes equilibrated at T > 1100 °C ( Figure 15B). The lower boundary of the sampled lithospheric mantle can be concluded to lie in the depth range of 175-190 km with a diamond window width of 55-70 km.  [35] for pyrope and Cr-spinel xenocrysts from the KL-01 pipe. Pyrope xenocrysts from the V. Grib kimberlite pipe pyropes [33]; pyropes and Cr-spinel xenocrysts from the Arkhangelskaya pipe [16]; Cr-spinel xenocrysts from the V. Grib kimberlite pipes (Tables S5-1 in Supplementary Material). (B) P-T estimates for pyrope xenocrysts from the KL-01 pipe. Colored symbols-projecting of T values [35] onto 37 mW/m 2 geotherm; black-white symbols-P-T values obtained using the method of [35]. V. Grib pipe peridotites [32]; "average" geotherm for ADP [64]. Geotherms from [65].

Composition and Metasomatic Evolution of the Lithospheric Mantle Sampled by the KL-01 Pipe
The garnet compositions indicate at least two types of mantle rocks composed of lithospheric mantle: predominant (78%) peridotites and subordinate (22%) eclogites. All the peridotite garnets are of lherzolite paragenesis, and eclogite garnets could be from the high-MgO and low-MgO eclogite suite. The data on trace element compositions of lherzolite pyropes can provide some information about the metasomatic evolution of the lithospheric mantle and its suitability for the formation and preservation of diamonds.
Most lherzolite pyropes (57% of the total lherzolitic pyrope population) are low in chromium (Cr 2 O 3 < 4 wt. %) with fractionated patterns from MREEs to HREEs. One pyrope grain (5%) of this group has a strong positive slope from LREEs to HREEs with MREEs near the C1 chondrite values and low Y, Zr and TiO 2 contents. Such pyropes have been previously observed in the V. Grib pipe lherzolites and xenocrysts [32,33], the Mir kimberlite pipe (Siberian craton) xenocrysts [34], as inclusions in diamonds from the Victor mine (Canada, VMG327-1 pyrope in [37]) and as exsolved pyropes in a Jagersfontein kimberlite (Kaapvaal craton) orthopyroxene megacryst (BD3736 in [38]; Figure 10A). This type of garnet matches the pre-metasomatic mantle garnet composition and could be "depleted". The P-T calculations indicate the origin of the pyrope from the lower depths (~180-190 km) of the lithospheric mantle. The other pyropes of this group (11 grains; 52%) have high MREE contents, mostly accompanied by positive correlations between TiO 2 , Y, Zr and Sm. This type of pyrope has previously been found in lherzolites from the Premier pipe (Kaapvaal craton; PR90-57 in [40]), as websteritic garnet inclusions in diamonds from Jagersfontein (JF 122 in [39]) and in samples of modern rivers and stream sediments within the northern areas of the Arkhangelsk region ( [3]; Figure 10B). The composition of such pyropes can reflect the early stage of metasomatic evolution of depleted pyropes. The compositions (TiO 2 < 0.06 wt. %; Y/Zr = 2.6 and 3.4) of two grains (nos. 10 and 16) exclude the influence of high-temperature silicate mantle melts, whereas other grains (TiO 2 = 0.09-0.2 wt. %; Y/Zr = 0.7-1.6) have signs of such influence. All of these pyropes could have originated from the shallow depths of the lithospheric mantle at 60-100 km.
Low-to moderate-chromium pyropes with flat patterns from MREEs to HREEs are also a large population in the KL-01 pyrope samples (6 grains; 29%). Such pyropes are most common within peridotite xenoliths from kimberlite localities worldwide; they are in major and trace element equilibrium with coexisting clinopyroxenes [66]. These pyropes show progressive increases in Y and Zr, corresponding to high-temperature metasomatic trends [36], and the metasomatic agent could have had a silicate composition, most likely a basaltic composition in terms of trace elements [32,33,66,67]. According to P-T estimates, this type of mantle metasomatism could have occurred through all sections of the lithospheric mantle beneath the KL-01 pipe from 60 to >150 km.
Two pyrope grains (9%) are high in chromium, have humped REE patterns and showing high TiO 2 , Zr and Y contents. Such pyropes are also frequently found in lherzolite xenoliths worldwide [68,69], including the ADP Arkhangelskaya and V. Grib kimberlite pipes [16,32,33]. No clinopyroxene shows trace element equilibrium with such garnet in peridotites [70]. The enrichments in HREEs in the pyropes indicate the silicate composition of the metasomatic agent. For the V. Grib peridotites, the composition of the parental melt for pyropes with humped REE patterns is concluded to be close to that of picrite [32,33], whereas for the Udachnaya peridotites, the parental melt composition was close to that of kimberlite [67,70]. The P-T calculations indicate the origin of the pyropes from the middle (~120 km) and lower depths (>150 km) of the lithospheric mantle beneath the KL-01 pipe.
One pyrope grain (5%) is low in Cr 2 O 3 , TiO 2 , Y and Zr and has a nearly sinusoidal REE pattern. To the best of my knowledge, this type of pyrope is not widespread within mantle peridotites in kimberlites worldwide but is abundant in samples of modern river and stream sediments within the northern areas of the Arkhangelsk region [3]. These pyropes could have been formed by the incursion of melts/fluids with high LREE/HREE ratios (carbonatite melt; [71,72]) into an initial low-chromium harzburgitic source [3] or by the reaction of the same melts/fluids with exsolved pyropes [33]. The P-T estimates indicate the origin of the pyrope to be from shallow depths in the lithospheric mantle (60-90 km).
The pyrope compositions indicate several types of metasomatic enrichment of the lithospheric mantle beneath the KL-01 pipe similar to those beneath diamondiferous localities, e.g., the ADP and the Siberian craton. The lower part (>150 km) of the lithospheric mantle has been affected at least by high-temperature silicate melts, nevertheless preserving lherzolites with depleted pyropes. The shallow part (<150 km) of the lithospheric mantle has been intensely metasomatized by both silicate and carbonatite types of metasomatism. In summary, the pyrope geochemistry shows that part of the lithosphere falls in the diamond stability field and has depleted and metasomatized signatures typically found in pyrope inclusions in diamonds. This suggests that the lithospheric mantle beneath the KL-01 pipe could be suitable for the formation and preservation of diamonds.

Conclusions
The compositions of sandstones in the KL-01 pipe clearly differ from those of the Vendian and Carboniferous Urzuga sandstones and show evidence of an admixture of magmatic material. According to the proposed model of binary mixing between the compositions of Vendian sandstones and typical ADP magmatic rocks, the type of magmatic component can be identified as kimberlite with a maximum of 20 vol. % admixture in the BRH-2 samples at depths ranging from 140-150 m. The widespread distribution of montmorillonite in the KL-01 pipe sandstones can indicate that these sandstones may be predominantly a component from the upper level of the kimberlite pipe crater and that the lower boundary of the crater may be deeper than 300 m from the surface, with a thickness of at least 160 m.
The major element compositions of the KL-01 pipe KIMs match those from the ADP kimberlites, with the following features: olivine and Cr-diopside match those of the Lomonosov and Grib peridotites; Cr-spinel is similar to those from the Arkhangelskaya and V. Grib kimberlite pipes and Izhmozero melilitites/picrites; and Mg-ilmenite has affinities to those from the Tsnigri-Arkhangelskaya and Arkhangelskaya kimberlite pipes.
The garnet compositions indicate that at least two types of mantle rocks composed the lithospheric mantle beneath the KL-01 pipe-predominant peridotites and subordinate eclogites. The lower boundary of the sampled lithospheric mantle could be in the depth range of 175-190 km with a diamond window width of 55-70 km. The pyrope geochemistry shows that part of the lithosphere falls in the diamond stability field and has depleted and metasomatized signatures which are typically found in pyrope inclusions in diamonds. This suggests that the lithospheric mantle beneath the KL-01 pipe could be suitable for the formation and preservation of diamonds. This study shows that the areas near boreholes 1 and 2 in the KL-01 pipe deserve more detailed drilling due to the high probability of discovering a new diamondiferous kimberlite pipe within the ADP.
The step-by-step use of the proposed model of binary mixing between the compositions of the Vendian sandstones and those of known ADP magmatic rocks can be applied to verify drilling of the prospective targets in the ADP territory to identify the type of magmatic material in the sandstones and exclude the sampling of the Carboniferous Urzuga suite, which will undoubtedly help in prospecting work for new kimberlite pipes in the region.
Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163 X/11/4/339/s1, Table S1:: General information about ADP magmatic rocks; Table S2: Major (wt.%) and trace (ppm) element composition of ADP magmatic rocks; Table S3: Major (wt. %) and trace (ppm) element composition of sandstones from the crater parts of the ADP magmatic pipes and Vendian sandstones; Table S4: Major (wt.%) and trace (ppm) element composition of kimberlite indicator minerals from the KL-01 pipe; Table S5: Major (wt.%) element composition of Cr-spinel and Mg-ilmenite xenocrysts from the V. Grib and Tsnigri-Arkhangelskaya kimberlite pipes; Table S6: Average major (wt. %) and trace (ppm) element composition of the ADP magmatic rocks used for modeling; Figure S1: Variety of the ADP pipe shapes in plan view and areal extent at the erosional surface; Figure S2: Schematic sections of the typical ADP magmatic pipes; Figure S3: Ca-Fe-Mg (mol. %) diagram for garnet; Figure S4: Position of the KL-01 pipe olivines on the Cr 2 O 3 -FeO diagram; Figure S5: Major element composition of Cr-diopside xenocrysts from the KL-01 pipe.