Preliminary U-Pb Detrital Zircon Ages from Tuﬁti di Tusa Formation (Lucanian Apennines, Southern Italy): Evidence of Rupelian Volcaniclastic Supply

: U-Pb spot ages have been determined on detrital zircons from two samples of volcaniclastic arenites belonging to the Tuﬁti di Tusa Formation (TTF) outcropping in the Lucanian Apennines (Southern Italy). Many petrographic and geochemical studies have been performed on these sandstones with the aim of deﬁning their detritus source. A new and precise evaluation of the mineralogical composition of metamorphic lithic fragments, together with U-Pb detrital zircon ages, helps to clarify the deposition age of these syn-sedimentary volcaniclastic sandstones and constrains their source areas. Volcaniclastic arenites consist of andesitic fragments and single minerals of plagioclases, clinopyroxenes, and hornblendes, while the metamorphic lithics are mainly fragments of blue amphibole-bearing micaschists, serpentinites, ophicalcites, phyllites, and medium-grade micaschists. Phaneritic plutonic fragments consist of quartz, feldspar, and micas. Carbonate components include biomicritic and biosparitic fragments. Eighty age data collected from 56 zircons reveal a wide age spectrum, ranging from Neoarchean to Rupelian (from 2712 ± 25 to 30 ± 1 Millions of years (Ma)). The age data show that in volcaniclastic sandstones there is evidence of ancient crystalline basements involved in Cadomian and Variscan orogenesis (ages from 2712 ± 25 Ma to ≈ 260 Ma), whereas the measured ages of 157 Ma testify the events of Pangea fragmentation and the ages between 78 and 67 Ma are related to subduction metamorphism connected to the Alpine orogenesis. Fifty percent of the estimated detrital zircon ages show a mean concordant age of 33 ± 1 Ma, they have been measured on idiomorphic crystals with undisturbed magmatic oscillatory zoning. These data reveal the true sedimentation age of Tuﬁti di Tusa sandstones at least at the sampled levels, coeval with that recorded in other Rupelian volcaniclastic successions outcropping in the Northern Apennines and in the Western Alps (e.g., Val d’Aveto-Petrignacola Formation, Ranzano Formation and Taveyannaz Sandstone). These data represent preliminary suggestions of the sedimentation age of the Tuﬁti di Tusa Formation and Rupelian paleogeography in the Western Mediterranean area. During Priabonian-Rupelian times, the volcanic calc-alkaline detritus linked to a widespread syn-sedimentary igneous activity on the hinterland terranes of the foredeep basins in the Apennine-Maghrebian orogen extended from north to south in the Western-Central Mediterranean area.


Geological Framework of Volcaniclastic Detritus
The Apennine belt extending from north to south along the Italian peninsula, represents one of the younger orogenic systems in the circum-Mediterranean area, and it is still active in the Ionian Sea [2,[21][22][23]. Its tectonic evolution took place in the Western Mediterranean area, owing to the interaction between the lithospheric plates belonging to European and African domains. The ancient tectonic elements of the Apennine chain ( Figure 1c) are related to the westward subduction of oceanic, transitional, and continental lithosphere belonging to the remnant northern-western Neotethys or the east Ligurian Tethys, located on the western side of the Adria Plate [2,24]. The hinterland domain of this tectonic system is represented by the European Sardinia-Corsica block and other smaller continental microplates, generally grouped in the Mesomediterranean Microplate ( Figure 1c) [17,20]), formed by Cadomian, Variscan, and Alpine fragments, including rocks of continental and oceanic origin (Variscan granitoids, low-middle-and high-grade Variscan metamorphites, and Alpine ophiolites). Calc-alkaline volcanic activity developed both in internal [10,[18][19][20]25] and in foreland domains [26]. On this subducting system, deep marine foredeep basins developed, known from the north to the south as the Sub-ligurian and Sicilidi domains or as the Calvana-Lucania and Maghrebian Oceanic Flysch basins [17] developed ( Figure 1c). The remnants of these basins are now scattered from the Alps to the Southern Apennine-Maghrebian chain. They consist of turbiditic deposits containing volcaniclastic detritus derived from a syn-sedimentary magmatic activity [27][28][29][30][31]. The different ages of volcaniclastic sandstones from the Alps and the Northern Apennines (Late Eocene-Early Oligocene) to the Southern Apennines (Lower Miocene) are linked to the migration of the volcanic activity, presumably due to the subduction plain roll-back [25]. However, determining the deposition age of the volcaniclastic sandstones in the Southern Apennines is a crucial challenge to be solved. Was the volcaniclastic detritus deposited later in the Southern Apennines than in the northern sectors? Was the volcanic activity of the Sardinia-Corsica block similar to that of the Mesomediterranean Microplate?
The turbidite deposits of deep marine foredeep basins are well represented in the external sector of the Southern Apennines near the Ionian Coast (Figure 1a). In this sector of the chain, the Rocca Imperiale Tectonic Unit belonging to the Sicilide Complex crops out ( Figure 2) [16,32]. This tectonic unit is regionally subdivided into two tectonically superimposed sub-units ( Figure 2), represented from top to bottom by the Torrente Cerreto sub-unit and the Corleto Perticara sub-unit. The Torrente Cerreto sub-unit shows a chaotic structure typical of a tectonic mélange, in contrast, the sedimentary succession of the Corleto Perticara sub-unit is well preserved and consists, from bottom to top, of the following formations ( Figure 3): Argille Varicolori Inferiori (Cretaceous-Paleocene), Monte Sant'Arcangelo Formation (Paleocene-Eocene), Argille Varicolori Superiori (Eocene-Oligocene), and TTF (Late Oligocene-Early Miocene) [32,33].
The study samples derive from a stratigraphic section located to the west of Rotondella Village (Matera district) along the valley of Candela Stream (Figure 3a,b), where the Sicilidi units are represented by the younger formations of the Corleto Perticara tectonic sub-unit: The Argille Varicolori Superiori and the TTF (Figure 3b,c). These units overthrust regionally the Nova Siri Tectonic Subunit (NSTS), represented mainly by the external Lower-Middle Miocene turbidite units of the Flysch Numidico and the Serra Palazzo formations ( [34,35] (Figure 3c). Toward the east, the Corleto Perticara tectonic subunit, representing the outcropping front of the chain, is unconformably covered by the Plio-Pleistocene sandy and clayey Bradanic Trough deposits (BTDs) [21,32].
The TTF formation lies unconformably on the Argille Varicolori Superiori and outcrops at the core of a syncline structure (Figure 3b). From a lithostratigraphical point of view, the formation is represented by a turbidite sedimentary succession, approximately 250 m thick, varying from calciclastic to grey-green siliciclastic-volcaniclastic arenites interbedded in mudrocks. In particular, the large amount of the volcaniclastic detritus characterizes the uppermost 60 m of the succession [33,36]. The observed sedimentary structures at the bottom of the volcaniclastic strata correspond to flute and load casts, indicating the prevalent southern provenance direction of detritus [28,[36][37][38] in the current geographical location. If the anticlockwise rotation of several tens of degrees of the Southern Apennines toward the Adria plate is taken into account [39,40], the southern provenance directions becomes almost western (Figure 1c).

Analytical Methods
Modal analyses were performed under an optical microscope on two samples of TTF sandstones with the aim of verifying if their petrographic composition is similar to that already known in the literature [28,31,37,38]. Point counts were made following the Gazzi-Dickinson method [41,42]; approximately 500 points were counted on each thin section, distinguishing the single crystalline phases by fine-grained fragments. The proportions of total quartz (Q), feldspar (F), and fine-grained lithic fragments (L) for plotting a QFL diagram were obtained by recalculation of 100% of the analytical data.
Major and various trace element analyses of the whole rock were performed by FRX utilizing a Philips PW1480 automatic spectrometer (Earth Science and Geo-environmental Dep., University of Bari, Italy) to determine the chemical composition of the volcaniclastic detritus and to compare it to

Analytical Methods
Modal analyses were performed under an optical microscope on two samples of TTF sandstones with the aim of verifying if their petrographic composition is similar to that already known in the literature [28,31,37,38]. Point counts were made following the Gazzi-Dickinson method [41,42]; approximately 500 points were counted on each thin section, distinguishing the single crystalline phases by fine-grained fragments. The proportions of total quartz (Q), feldspar (F), and fine-grained lithic fragments (L) for plotting a QFL diagram were obtained by recalculation of 100% of the analytical data.
Major and various trace element analyses of the whole rock were performed by FRX utilizing a Philips PW1480 automatic spectrometer (Earth Science and Geo-environmental Dep., University of Bari, Italy) to determine the chemical composition of the volcaniclastic detritus and to compare it to Minerals 2020, 10, 786 7 of 24 that known in the literature. The samples were promising for zircon selection, the Zr content being 145 and 166 ppm in the TTA and TTB samples, respectively.
Detrital zircon crystals were extracted from 50-125 µm and 125-250 µm fractions obtained from approximately 3 kg of rock. The finer fraction (50-125 µm) was more fertile for zircons in both samples, but the medium-coarse-grained fraction was almost promising in the coarse-grained sample (TTA). The small and big zircons were selected for U-Pb dating with the aim of evaluating the possible dependence of the zircon ages from the particle sizes [43,44]. More steps with the Frantz magnetic separator were needed to remove all quartz grains wrapped by oxidation patina. Subsequently, the non-magnetic fractions were treated with a high-density solution for gravity separation.
The clearest, internal crack-, and inclusion-free zircon grains were hand-picked under a stereo-microscope in order to exclude any zircons producing discordant ages not suitable for the purpose of this work [45,46]. In fact, crystals with evident radiation damage and showing metamict rims are prone of producing discordant ages [44]. After accurate selection of promising zircon grains, they were placed into epoxy resin mounts and polished to expose the grain interior.
Analysis of the morphology and internal micro-textures of the zircons was performed using scanning electron microscope (SEM) using a Zeiss EVO50XVP (at University of Bari).
Backscattered electron detector (BSED) images were used to examine morphologic features and to check inclusion and fracture occurrence. Internal zoning patterns were evidenced by a variable pressure secondary electron (VPSE) detector, settled under high-vacuum conditions, which revealed high-resolution images perfectly comparable to the most common cathodoluminescence images [47]. The VPSE images were very useful for determining the location of spots on homogeneous crystal domains that were suggestive of a clear origin of the detrital zircons. After geochronological investigation, the zircon grains were further inspected with the VPSE detector, to check the precise location of the ablated spots.
U-Pb spot analyses were performed by LA-ICP-MS at the IGG-CNR (Pavia, Italy) utilizing the system configuration and methodology reported by [48,49]. For details about the analytical setting, refer to [50,51]. All analytical results are shown in Supplementary Table S1.
The data reduction, age calculation, and uncertainty propagation were performed following [52,53]. The filtering of the U-Pb ages was mainly based on a 10% cut off of the discordance of the given 206 Pb/ 238 U age for zircons with ages younger than 1.4 Ga. Instead, for grains older than 1.4 Ga, the 206 Pb/ 207 Pb age was considered as the best age in dependence of minor error of this ratio linked to Pb loss in inherited zircons [52,53]. The representation of age data follows the model of kernel density estimation [54].
The upper part of the arenaceous succession contain abundant volcaniclastic detritus as single minerals or porphyritic andesite lithics, peculiar metamorphic lithics such as serpentinites, blue amphibole-bearing micaschists, garnet-bearing micaschists, epidote-bearing micaschists, orthogneisses and single heavy minerals as staurolite, glaucophane, epidote, and garnet. The blue amphibole is mainly crossite and subordinately glaucophane, and it coexists with albite, quartz, phengite, epidote, garnet and titanite, indicating that high-pressure metamorphic rocks were present among the source rocks [37]. The chemistry of whole rocks allowed to classify the volcanic material as andesitic, consistent with the nature of the volcanic lithics and single crystals [37].
An accurate mineralogical characterization of the interbedded mudrocks together with detrital grain features suggested poor sorting related to rapid sedimentation without significant recycling processes [31]. Further evidence of the volcaniclastic nature of the supply emerged from volcanic glass shards found in thin mudrock levels and from the abundance of smectite in the Illite/Smectite (I/S) mixed layers, probably related to the diagenetic alteration of the weathered original pyroclastic and/or volcaniclastic rocks [31].

Sample TTA and TTB
The selected sandstones derive from feldspatolithic petrofacies as indicated by [28,31]. The TTA sample is representative of medium-coarse-grained sandstones and the TTB sample of fine-grained types. The petrographic composition of the two samples is comparable, despite different grain size (Figure 4a,b), and both predominantly contain angular fragments, scarce cement, and a pseudo-matrix derived from the alteration of volcanic components. The fine-grained sample (TTB in Figure 4b) contains more abundant alteration products in pseudo-matrix due to its fine-grained texture. The principal composition is in average Q 16 F 52 L 32 and the framework consists of prevalent volcanic detritus (approximately 70% in volume) represented by single minerals and porphyritic andesite lithics with phenocrysts of zoned plagioclase, clinopyroxene and brown/green amphiboles (Figure 4c,d). Granitic, metamorphic, siliciclastic, and carbonate components are present in minor amounts. The phaneritic plutonic fragments consist of quartz, feldspar, and micas ( Figure 4a). Among the metamorphic lithics, low-and medium-grade micaschists, orthogneisses, ophicalcites, and serpentinites (Figure 4e,f) are evident together with blue amphibole-bearing micaschists (Figure 4g,h). Single crystals of mica, feldspar, quartz, epidote, staurolite, garnet, and blue amphibole are widespread, together with biomicritic and biosparitic fragments.
The chemical compositions of study sandstones (Table 1)   LOI: loss on ignition.
In Figure 5, the principal composition of the study samples is compared to the literature data [18,28,31,37,38] in the Dickinson's provenance diagram [55]. They fall into the same field, corresponding to feldspatolithic sandstones with abundant volcanic components named petrofacies iv [28,31]; in addition, the detrital mode of these sandstones is related to a magmatic arc source [55,56]. A comparison with the chemical composition of volcaniclastic sandstones reported by [37] (Table 1) confirms that the study samples show a composition very similar to feldspatolithic sandstones with abundant volcanic component.    [41,55,56]. The detrital mode of study samples TTA and TTB is compared to the literature data: light grey area [37,38]; black polygon [28]; dark grey oval [31]. Q, (total quartz); F, (feldspars); L, (fine-grained lithic fragments).

Morphology and Internal Zircon Textures
Fifty-six zircon crystals were separated (forty-five for the TTA sample and eleven for the TTB sample) and observed by the VPSE detector to inspect their morphological features and internal textures. Generally, the VPSE images of zircon grains show light and dark regions corresponding to lower and higher U contents, respectively. High-U dark regions usually report major radiation damages resulting from metamict zircons losing radiogenic Pb and producing discordant ages [43,53,57]. These domains were excluded for isotopic analysis.
In the realm of the selected zircons, some grains show rare fractures (zrns 36 and 6 in Figure 6a and zrn 1 in Figure 6b in the TTA sample and zrn 21 in Figure 7 in the TTB sample) or are broken with missing edge domains (zrns 4, 7 and 26, in Figure 6a,c in the TTA sample, and zrn 24 in Figure 7 in the TTB sample). These damages may have been produced during the zircon selection procedures or during the sediment transport; the preserved domains of these crystals were dated. The other selected zircon grains show euhedral-sub-euhedral habitus (e.g., zrns 6, 40, and 52C in Figure 6a and zrns 21 and 23A in Figure 7) or sub-rounded shapes (zrns 38B, 71C and 8 in Figure 6a,c,d and zrns 12 and 14 in Figure 7). Both typologies of crystals, equally distributed in the samples were dated.
The majority of the selected crystals shows an easily recognizable oscillatory zoning growth with a clear magmatic origin [50]. Best shielded magmatic zoning is evident in the preserved euhedral crystals, in which oscillatory bands can be observed in continuity from the core to the rim indicating a regular growth in a single magmatic event (zrns 45, 46, 36, 52C, 56A and 6 in Figure 6a). A few of the crystals show a sector zoning (e.g., zrn 67 in Figure 7), probably connected to changes in the rapid kinetic factor [58].
Rounded crystals with perturbed, convoluted, and blurred original concentric oscillatory zoning (zrns 58A and 30 in Figure 6b,e and zrns 14 and 17 in Figure 7) are also present; such textures can be produced by secondary modifications (i.e., post-magmatic cooling or medium-high-grade metamorphism) [50]. Sometimes they are present as inherited core domains partially reabsorbed and enveloped by successive overgrowth truncating their original zoning (e.g., zrn 44 in Figure 6e and zrn 22 in Figure 7). The great diversity of the morphology and internal pattern zoning of the zircons highlights the variety of the detrital supply, which denotes the complex and long-lasting petrogenetic history of the source rocks (i.e., igneous, metamorphic, sedimentary).  [41,55,56]. The detrital mode of study samples TTA and TTB is compared to the literature data: light grey area [37,38]; black polygon [28]; dark grey oval [31]. Q, (total quartz); F, (feldspars); L, (fine-grained lithic fragments).

Morphology and Internal Zircon Textures
Fifty-six zircon crystals were separated (forty-five for the TTA sample and eleven for the TTB sample) and observed by the VPSE detector to inspect their morphological features and internal textures. Generally, the VPSE images of zircon grains show light and dark regions corresponding to lower and higher U contents, respectively. High-U dark regions usually report major radiation damages resulting from metamict zircons losing radiogenic Pb and producing discordant ages [43,53,57]. These domains were excluded for isotopic analysis.
In the realm of the selected zircons, some grains show rare fractures (zrns 36 and 6 in Figure 6a and zrn 1 in Figure 6b in the TTA sample and zrn 21 in Figure 7 in the TTB sample) or are broken with missing edge domains (zrns 4, 7 and 26, in Figure 6a,c in the TTA sample, and zrn 24 in Figure 7 in the TTB sample). These damages may have been produced during the zircon selection procedures or during the sediment transport; the preserved domains of these crystals were dated. The other selected zircon grains show euhedral-sub-euhedral habitus (e.g., zrns 6, 40, and 52C in Figure 6a and zrns 21 and 23A in Figure 7) or sub-rounded shapes (zrns 38B, 71C and 8 in Figure 6a,c,d and zrns 12 and 14 in Figure 7). Both typologies of crystals, equally distributed in the samples were dated.
The majority of the selected crystals shows an easily recognizable oscillatory zoning growth with a clear magmatic origin [50]. Best shielded magmatic zoning is evident in the preserved euhedral crystals, in which oscillatory bands can be observed in continuity from the core to the rim indicating a regular growth in a single magmatic event (zrns 45, 46, 36, 52C, 56A and 6 in Figure 6a). A few of the crystals show a sector zoning (e.g., zrn 67 in Figure 7), probably connected to changes in the rapid kinetic factor [58].
Rounded crystals with perturbed, convoluted, and blurred original concentric oscillatory zoning (zrns 58A and 30 in Figure 6b,e and zrns 14 and 17 in Figure 7) are also present; such textures can be produced by secondary modifications (i.e., post-magmatic cooling or medium-high-grade metamorphism) [50]. Sometimes they are present as inherited core domains partially reabsorbed and enveloped by successive overgrowth truncating their original zoning (e.g., zrn 44 in Figure 6e and zrn 22 in Figure 7). The great diversity of the morphology and internal pattern zoning of the zircons highlights the variety of the detrital supply, which denotes the complex and long-lasting petrogenetic history of the source rocks (i.e., igneous, metamorphic, sedimentary).

Detrital Zircon Chronology
The size and shape parameters of each dated zircon were measured by calculating the equivalent spherical diameter (ESD) in order to explore the potential age-size relationships. ESD is the cube root of the product of the lengths of the three axes of zircon grains; in thin sections the intermediate axis was taken as short axis [43]. Figure 8 highlights that the distribution of ages is independent of the ESD shape parameter; in both samples, big and small grains show overlapping

Detrital Zircon Chronology
The size and shape parameters of each dated zircon were measured by calculating the equivalent spherical diameter (ESD) in order to explore the potential age-size relationships. ESD is the cube root of the product of the lengths of the three axes of zircon grains; in thin sections the intermediate axis was taken as short axis [43]. Figure 8 highlights that the distribution of ages is independent of the ESD shape parameter; in both samples, big and small grains show overlapping ages and consequently, the calculated zircon ages are representative of the whole rock. The measured zircon ages in the TTA sample are more abundant than those in the TTB sample; however, in the latter sample, records of older zircons are represented by ages ranging from 1.8 Ga to 2.8 Ga ( 207 Pb/ 206 Pb ages) that were not present in the TTA sample (Figures 9 and 10).
Minerals 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 24 ages and consequently, the calculated zircon ages are representative of the whole rock. The measured zircon ages in the TTA sample are more abundant than those in the TTB sample; however, in the latter sample, records of older zircons are represented by ages ranging from 1.8 Ga to 2.8 Ga ( 207 Pb/ 206 Pb ages) that were not present in the TTA sample (Figures 9, 10).

Zircon Ages in the TTA Sample
Sixty-six U-Pb spot analyses on 45 zircon crystals yielded fifty-four concordant ages, seven sub-concordant, and five discordant data. The range of measured ages is very large, varying from 717 Ma to 30 Ma (Figures 6, 9a, and 10a,b); in the following, age groups are presented by the youngest to oldest.

Zircon Ages in the TTA Sample
Sixty-six U-Pb spot analyses on 45 zircon crystals yielded fifty-four concordant ages, seven sub-concordant, and five discordant data. The range of measured ages is very large, varying from 717 Ma to 30 Ma (Figures 6, 9a and 10a,b); in the following, age groups are presented by the youngest to oldest.
Two concordant ages referable to Upper Jurassic at 157 ± 2 and 156 ± 2 Ma (zrns 50A and 58A in Figure 6b) were discovered on two corroded and modified domains showing high luminescence.
Thirteen Carboniferous-Permian ages ranging from 319 ± 3 to 265 ± 3 Ma represent the second largest group (24% of the age data; e.g., zrns 26, 28, 31, and 42 in Figure 6c); these ages are relative to the rhythmic or oscillatory zoning domains of broken grains showing a rounded shape.

Zircon Ages in the TTB Sample
Eleven zircon grains were analyzed in this sample and 17 spot analyses were performed. The collected data cover 11 concordant ages, four sub-concordant ages, and two discordant ages. Considering both the concordant and sub-concordant data, a large range of ages extending from 2813 ± 30 Ma to 34 ± 1 Ma were measured (Figures 7, 9b and 10c).
The youngest ages revealed in this sample were sub-concordant (% U-Pb discordance between 18% and 27%) corresponding to 34, 35, and 36 Ma. These sub-concordant ages were produced on the domains of magmatic oscillatory zoning (zrns 15 and 23B) and presumably on the recrystallized rim of an older igneous zircon (zrn 21).
The most relevant age group is represented by seven Carboniferous-Permian ages, ranging from 348 ± 3 Ma to 258 ± 2 Ma. They were measured on sub-idiomorphic (zrns 21 and 24) or rounded crystals (zrns 12, 14 and 23A) showing oscillatory or partially modified domains of zoning.
A single age referable to the Lower Devonian (416 ± 4 Ma on zrn 17) was present on one rounded crystal with an internal complex and convoluted zoning.
Two Paleoproterozoic ages were measured on one prismatic grain with a bipyramidal shape (zrn 22). The core domain, dated at 1998 ± 21 Ma, seems to refer to a partially reabsorbed inherited crystal, while the subsequent overgrowth (1885 ± 20 Ma) shows a clear magmatic oscillatory zoning.
The two oldest ages (Neoarchean 2813 ± 30 Ma and 2737 ± 29 Ma) were found on one sub-rounded grain (zrn 18) without internal recognizable textures, probably, because of the long geological history that modified it.
The substantially different productivity of the datable zircons in the two samples seems to depend on grain size and alteration; the fine-grained detritus contains more alteration products in the matrix and selects lighter grains in which the zircons have a low chance to be enriched.
The U-Pb zircon ages collected in the two samples (Table 2) can be divided into three large groups: (i) Pre-Carboniferous ages; (ii) Carboniferous-Permian ages; (iii) Priabonian-Rupelian ages. The two Upper Jurassic ages and three Cretaceous ages, although poorly represented, have a relevant geological significance. In the following sections, the geological input derived from the geochronological data linked with the mineral composition of the lithic fragments is displayed.

Priabonian-Rupelian Sedimentation Ages
TTF volcaniclastic sandstones are considered an expression of a syn-sedimentary volcanism mixed with scarce detritus deriving from a crystalline source of the Calabrian terranes [18,59]. Their sedimentation age still lacks a univocally definition on the biostratigraphic basis; for example, it is indicated as Late Oligocene-Early Miocene by [14,[16][17][18] and Late Eocene-Early Oligocene by other authors [19]. Uncertainties as a result of the small number of suitable biomarkers and by various reworkings of taxa are very common in deep sea turbiditic deposits.
Newly acquired U-Pb detrital zircon data allow to clarify these uncertainties. Half of the concordant ages measured on the idiomorphic zircons with a clear magmatic oscillatory zoning presented a mean age of 33 ± 1 Ma (Figures 8 and 10a). These data, together with the abundance of fragments and single minerals of volcanic origin, indicate that the prevalent detritus was derived from an active volcanic arc in the Priabonian-Rupelian. The peak in age at 33 ± 1 Ma constrains the depositional age of TTF sandstones, confirming the oldest biostratigraphic records indicated by [19]. This sedimentation age, which emerged in the considered samples from the Lucanian Apennines, is well correlated with the sedimentation time estimated for the analogous volcaniclastic detritus of the Taveyannaz sandstones in the Western Alps (approximately 34 Ma in [60]), the Val d'Aveto-Petrignacola dated Early Oligocene [6,23], and the Ranzano formations in the Northern Apennines [7].
The records of Rupelian volcaniclastic sandstones even in the Southern Italy added a relevant geological constraint to Central Mediterranean paleogeography. The volcanic activity syn-sedimentary with TTF sandstone deposition, on the basis of these preliminary data, can be considered Rupelian in age. Consequently, relatively synchronous Priabonian-Rupelian volcanic activity along the front of the forming Apennine chain is widespread from north to south in the Western Mediterranean area, as shown by the comparable deposition ages of the volcaniclastic sandstones incorporated in the northern and southern Apennine belt ( Figure 11). syn-sedimentary with TTF sandstone deposition, on the basis of these preliminary data, can be considered Rupelian in age. Consequently, relatively synchronous Priabonian-Rupelian volcanic activity along the front of the forming Apennine chain is widespread from north to south in the Western Mediterranean area, as shown by the comparable deposition ages of the volcaniclastic sandstones incorporated in the northern and southern Apennine belt ( Figure 11). Figure 11. Redrawn paleogeographic sketch of the Western-Central Mediterranean area in the Priabonian-Rupelian age (modified from [2,20]). The Tufiti di Tusa sandstones were deposited in the Rupelian Foredeep Basin (RFB) near Mesomediterranean Microplate and far from the Sardinia-Corsica block. Symbols "vvv" represent the depositional domain of the volcaniclastic sandstones; blue star is the geographical location of the studied outcrops; blue lines indicate the drainage system. The Sardinia-Corsica volcanic activity was poor in the Priabonian-Rupelian times [6,10]. Figure 11. Redrawn paleogeographic sketch of the Western-Central Mediterranean area in the Priabonian-Rupelian age (modified from [2,20]). The Tufiti di Tusa sandstones were deposited in the Rupelian Foredeep Basin (RFB) near Mesomediterranean Microplate and far from the Sardinia-Corsica block. Symbols "vvv" represent the depositional domain of the volcaniclastic sandstones; blue star is the geographical location of the studied outcrops; blue lines indicate the drainage system. The Sardinia-Corsica volcanic activity was poor in the Priabonian-Rupelian times [6,10].

Geological History Told by Zircon Ages from the Pre-Carboniferous to the Rupelian Times
The pre-Carboniferous ages range from Neoarchean to Paleoproterozoic (around 2775 Ma and 1941 Ma, respectively), while those of Cryogenian-Ediacaran range from 717 ± 7 to 506 ± 5 Ma and those Ordovician-Silurian-Devonian from 455 ± 4 Ma to 387 ± 4 Ma (Figure 9a,b, and Figure 10b,c). Remnants of these ages are recorded in the Variscan orogen, characterized by a protracted evolution from the Neoproterozoic until the final assemblage of Pangea in the Devonian-Carboniferous period with the consumption of the Rehic Ocean and the continental collision between Laurussia and Gondwana ( [61] and the references therein). Older ages (i.e., 2800 Ma and 1900 Ma) in the Variscan orogen were found in remnants produced by the gravitational collapse of the Cadomian orogeny involving the peri-Gondwanan terranes related to the West African Craton [62]. During the Carboniferous-Permian-exhumation phases, a high volume of granitoids were put in place in the Variscan orogen. In the current realm of the Mediterranean area, pieces of Variscan orogen are present from Iberia to the Anti-Atlas Mountains, and in Sardinia-Corsica (pro-part) block or are included in the Alpine chain in the Alps and the Calabria-Peloritani-Arc (Figure 1c). The relict pre-Carboniferous zircons and those of Carboniferous-Permian ages corresponding to peaks of 291 Ma and 295 Ma in the TTA and TTB samples, respectively (Figure 10b,c), may arise from these fragments scattered in the Western-Central Mediterranean area. The inner texture of the zircons of Carboniferous-Permian ages seems related to growth in plutonic-acidic-magmatic context, such as granitoids forming large portions of the Variscan basements. Obviously, the Variscan basements that, in the Oligocene, were closer to the foredeep basins of the Apennine system, can be recognized in the Western Alps, the Sardinia Corsica (pro-part) block, and the Calabria-Peloritani-Arc ( Figure 11). The sediment routing pathways are shown in Figure 11, where the detritus of the studied sandstones could be derived from pieces of continental crust belonging to the Mesomediterranean Microplate as the Calabria-Peloritani Arc that, in the Pribonian-Rupelian age was facing the foredeep basin domain (RFB in Figure 11).
During Cretaceous-Early Paleogene the eastward and southward subduction of the Tethys ocean beneath the Adriatic continental plate and the Mesomediterranean Microplate formed the Alpine Chain and successively remnants of the Alpine orogens (i.e., Alpine Corsica, Catena Costiera in Calabria, Brianzonese Zone in the Western Alps, and Ligurian-Piedmontese ophiolites) were boudinaged and passively incorporated into the hinterland of the Apennine-Maghrebian accretionary wedges [63] in the Eocene -Oligocene period ( Figure 11).
In the Middle-Late Eocene, in fact, a new NW-directed Apennine-Maghrebian subduction system commenced in the Central-Western Mediterranean. During the Apennine-Maghrebian orogenesis, an intense volcanic activity took place on the hinterland terrains around 32-28 Ma, as testified by the calc-alkaline products widespread in the Alpine Chain, in the south-east of France, and in Sardinia [2,17,64]. However, the volume of subduction-related magmatism in Sardinia remained substantially very scarce from 38 to 26 Ma, reaching a peak around 22-18 Ma [2,10]. Consequently, the high volume of volcaniclastic deposits widespread in the Apennine foredeep basins cannot be related only to these volcanic centers, but more dispersed volcanos can be hypothesized to be present on the hinterland area forming the front of chain ( Figure 11). The mixture of volcanic detritus with serpentinites, ophicalcites, and blue amphibole-bearing micaschists derived from ophiolitic terranes with signatures of metamorphic evolution from burial to exhumation, indicates that the remnants of the Alpine chain with volcanism relative to Oligocene were elongated from north to south in the Mediterranean area ( Figure 11). In fact, according to [2,18], the Alpine chain formed a large continuum system in the Western Mediterranean area recorded in the Western Alps, testified by remnants of Alpine thrust dredged in the Tyrrhenian Sea [65] and even in deposits of the back-arc basins of Kabylie (Northern Africa) and Calabria (in Southern Italy) with signatures of subduction metamorphism [2,18].
This statement finds strict constraints in the few but significant ages measured in the zircons of TTF sandstones. In fact, the ages around 157 Ma (Figure 10b) can be connected to meta-albitite dikes dated to 152 ± 2 Ma, representing the products of a late-stage intra-oceanic magmatism injected in gabbros and basalts dated to 165 ± 3 Ma that form the oceanic Tethyan lithosphere [1,66]. The ages 67 ± 1 and 78 ± 1 Ma measured on the rims of zrn1 in the TTA sample (Figure 6b, Figure 10b) can be related, in turn, to the Alpine metamorphism dated around 65 ± 6 Ma by [67] on the zircon fringes in ophiolitic sequences of the Zermatt-Sass zone in the Western Alps. It is likely that ophiolites of similar ages were incorporated in the eastern area of Mesomediterranean Microplate overlooking the Rupelian foredeep basin (RFB in Figure 11).
The western internal domains of the foredeep basins during the Apennine tectonism were constituted by ( Figure 11): (i) Remnants of Cadomian orogeny included in the Variscan chain fragments; (ii) domains of the Variscan chain formed by continental crust in which low-medium-grade metamorphites and granitoids prevail; (iii) portions of Alpine ophiolites consisting of ophicalcites, serpentinites, blue amphibole-bearing micaschists with evidences of subduction metamorphism; and (iv) andesitic calc-alkaline volcaniclastites representing a syn-sedimentary volcanism dated as Priabonian-Rupelian, likely located on the Mesomediterranean Microplate and in contrast to the volcanic activity of Sardinia with a climax in Early Miocene. All of these domains that form the Mesomediterranean Microplate were eroded by a hydrographic system that flows into the Rupelian Foredeep Basin. The western provenance direction of the detritus fits the indications derived by paleocurrents, indicating a southern provenance due to the anticlockwise rotation of the Apennine elements [28,[38][39][40]68].

Conclusions
The first U-Pb ages collected on detrital zircons and the mineralogical composition of the lithic fragments of TTF volcaniclastic sandstones from the study area in the Lucanian Apennines suggest the following deductions: (a) The petrographic and geochemical features of the studied samples are perfectly in line with the literature data [14,28,31,37,38,59] suggesting a provenance from a magmatic arc with calc-alkaline affinity placed on a crystalline basement with a sedimentary cover; (b) The high volume of volcanic detritus (approximately 70%) in the considered succession, with a thickness of about 60 m, shows that the maximum syn-sedimentary volcanic input in the Southern Apennines foredeep took place during the Late Priabonian-Early Rupelian as evidenced by the abundances of magmatic idiomorphic zircons with ages around 33 ± 1 Ma (Figures 8 and  10a), suggesting the true sedimentation age, for almost all the study levels. However, more volcaniclastic strata must be analyzed to extrapolate this age to the entire volcaniclastic sequence. (c) A comparison of the established U-Pb zircon ages with those of the syn-orogenic and syn-sedimentary volcanic deposits outcropping in the Mediterranean region, shows great similarities with the ages of the volcaniclastic sandstones of the Val d'Aveto-Petrignacola and Ranzano formations in the Northern Apennine [6,8,11,23] and with those of the Taveyannaz sandstones deposited in the Northern Alpine foredeep [60]. (d) Priabonian-Rupelian volcanic activity does not correspond to the maximum climax recorded in Sardinia (around 22-18 Ma in [10]). The hinterland terranes or the Mesomediterranean Microplate facing the foredeep basins of the Apennine-Maghrebian system can be depicted as a complex structured source area formed by remnants of Cadomian terranes in the Variscan basement, consisting of granitoids and metamorphic rocks, HP-LT metamorphites, ophiolites, and Priabonian-Rupelian volcanic edifices widespread from north to south in the Western Mediterranean area.
The collected data are preliminary and represent two sedimentary episodes of volcaniclastic succession in the Southern Apennines. A future investigation of U-Pb detrital zircon ages in other volcaniclastic sandstones from Southern Apennines and Sicily would place more stringent constraints on Priabonian-Rupelian paleogeography in the Western Mediterranean area.