Physico-Chemical, Mineralogical, and Chemical Characterisation of Cretaceous–Paleogene / Neogene Kaolins within Eastern Dahomey and Niger Delta Basins from Nigeria: Possible Industrial Applications

: The demand for kaolinitic clays for various industrial applications is increasing globally. The present study evaluated the potential industrial applications of kaolins from the Eastern Dahomey and Niger Delta Basins, Nigeria. The colour, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), particle size distribution (PSD), plastic limits and liquid limits of the kaolins were determined. Mineralogical properties were assessed using X-ray di ﬀ ractometry (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and di ﬀ erential thermal analysis (DTA). The chemical compositions of the kaolins were determined using X-ray ﬂuorescence spectrometry (XRF). The kaolins were generally acidic, with pH less than 7 with low EC. The moderate plasticity indices (PI ≥ 10%) for the kaolins suggested their potential use in the manufacturing of structural clay products without extrusion. Kaolinite was the only kaolin mineral present with anhedral–subhedral–euhedral crystals. The platy morphology of the kaolinites in the Cretaceous kaolins are very important in paper production. Other minerals present in the kaolins were quartz, muscovite, anatase and goethite. The major oxide contents of the kaolins were dominated by SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , Fe 2 O 3 and TiO 2 . Based on chemical speciﬁcations, the raw kaolins are not suitable for most industrial applications except for the Cretaceous Lakiri kaolins in the paper and ceramic industries (except for TiO 2 and K 2 O content). The study concluded that the kaolin deposits would require beneﬁciation for large-scale industrial applications.


Introduction
Large kaolin deposits of primary and secondary origins with enormous reserves have been identified across Nigeria [1,2]. Known kaolin deposits of Cretaceous and Paleogene/Neogene ages occur within the sedimentary basins, which are believed to be filled with Cretaceous-Recent sediments except for some Paleogene/Neogene kaolin occurring within the Jos Plateau in areas underlain by the younger granites [3]. Several kaolin deposits in the world are mined and processed for industrial uses. These include the Cretaceous-Paleogene/Neogene Georgia and South Carolina sedimentary kaolins in United States of America, which have been explored since the 1750s [4], the Cornwall and Devon kaolins in Southwestern England, which are believed to be the world's largest and highest grade primary kaolin deposits, and the Jari and Capim Rivers Paleogene/Neogene sedimentary kaolins in the Amazon region of Northern Brazil [5].

Study Areas
The Cretaceous (Lakiri and Eruku) and Paleogene/Neogene (Ubulu-Uku and Awo-Omama) kaolin deposits are exposed within the Abeokuta Group and Ogwashi-Asaba Formation of the Eastern Dahomey and Niger Delta Basins, respectively ( Figure 1 and Table 1). The Lakiri kaolin deposit outcrops within the Lakiri village in Obafemi-Owode local government area (LGA) of Ogun State. The kaolin is dominantly purple to creamy-white with thicknesses up to 5 m with no distinct horizon and overburden up to 2 m ( Figure 2). The deposit is quite extensive beyond the study site with estimated thickness based on geoelectrical vertical sounding (VES) varying from 0.4 m to 17 m [10]. The Eruku kaolin deposit outcrops within the Eruku village in Ado-Odo LGA of Ogun State. The deposit is generally reddish yellow with a height of about 5 m and more than 35 m wide with overburden top sandy soil of 1.5 m (Figure 2). The Ubulu-Uku kaolin outcrops along Agokun River near Anioma village, east of Agbor, Delta State. It extends for more than 2.5 km and thickness varies from 10 m to 40 m with an estimated reserve of more than 15.5 × 10 6 metric tonnes [11]. It is overlain by a brown-reddish ferricretic layer from which iron is leached by percolating water, giving rise to a purplish colour at the contact zone between the base of the ferricretic layer and the upper horizon of the kaolin deposit ( Figure 2). The Awo-Omama kaolin deposit outcrops along the western wall of the Njiagba river valley near Awo-Omama village in the Orlu LGA of Imo State. Exposures of this deposit are also known to occur along the Onitsha-Owerri road (about 5 km south of the main outcrop and quarry site). The deposit grades downwards from creamy-white to purplish-yellow at the base ( Figure 2). The deposit is embedded within a friable cross-bedded sandstone deposit with herringbone structures at some spots. Large sub-angular to rounded pebbles were also found within the sandstone. Based on VES, the estimated thickness of the deposit varied from 30 m to 90 m with an estimated reserve of 3.92 × 10 6 metric tonnes [11].  [12,13]).  [12,13]).

Sampling
Two profiles were sampled for each kaolin deposit (except for Eruku with three profiles) at intervals with 28 kaolin samples obtained (Table 1, Figure 2). Composite samples (obtained by mixing all the samples from each kaolin profile into one homogenous sample) were used for the determination of Atterberg limits, giving a total of 9 samples (one sample per kaolin profile). The <2 mm fraction was taken as the bulk [15].

Analyses
The colour of each bulk sample was obtained by making a visual comparison with the soil colours in the Munsell soil colour chart [16]. The pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were determined using Crison BasiC 20 and 30 pH and EC meters, respectively following the procedures outlined by van Reeuwijk [15]. The determination of three fractions (sand, silt and clay) by the hydrometer method followed the procedures described by van Reeuwijk [15]. The Atterberg limit (liquid and plastic limits) tests were determined using the Casagrande method [17,18].
X-ray diffraction (XRD) qualitative analyses of the bulk kaolin samples were carried using a Bruker AXS D8 Advance PSD system operated at 40 kV and 40 mA, scanned between 3-85° with a 0.034° 2θ step scan, and 2 s/step with Cu-Kα radiation at the Ithemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa (SA). The phase identifications were carried out by search/match function using X'Pert Highscore Plus Software with the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD). Characteristic kaolinite peaks were observed at 7.13 Ǻ, 4.36 Ǻ, 4.16 Ǻ and 3.57 Ǻ; whereas peaks at 4.25 Ǻ and 3.34 Ǻ were assigned to quartz. Peaks observed at 3.51 Ǻ, 4.15 Ǻ, 2.71 Ǻ and 10.01 Ǻ were assigned to anatase, goethite,

Sampling
Two profiles were sampled for each kaolin deposit (except for Eruku with three profiles) at intervals with 28 kaolin samples obtained (Table 1, Figure 2). Composite samples (obtained by mixing all the samples from each kaolin profile into one homogenous sample) were used for the determination of Atterberg limits, giving a total of 9 samples (one sample per kaolin profile). The <2 mm fraction was taken as the bulk [15].

Analyses
The colour of each bulk sample was obtained by making a visual comparison with the soil colours in the Munsell soil colour chart [16]. The pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were determined using Crison BasiC 20 and 30 pH and EC meters, respectively following the procedures outlined by van Reeuwijk [15]. The determination of three fractions (sand, silt and clay) by the hydrometer method followed the procedures described by van Reeuwijk [15]. The Atterberg limit (liquid and plastic limits) tests were determined using the Casagrande method [17,18].
X-ray diffraction (XRD) qualitative analyses of the bulk kaolin samples were carried using a Bruker AXS D8 Advance PSD system operated at 40 kV and 40 mA, scanned between 3-85 • with a 0.034 • 2θ step scan, and 2 s/step with Cu-Kα radiation at the Ithemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa (SA). The phase identifications were carried out by search/match function using X'Pert Highscore Plus Software with the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD). Characteristic kaolinite peaks were observed at 7.13Ǻ, 4.36Ǻ, 4.16Ǻ and 3.57Ǻ; whereas peaks at 4.25Ǻ and 3.34Ǻ were assigned to quartz. Peaks observed at 3.51Ǻ, 4.15Ǻ, 2.71Ǻ and 10.01Ǻ were assigned to anatase, goethite, hematite, and muscovite, respectively. The weight percentages of the mineral phases were obtained using the Rietveld method at XRD Analytical and Consulting cc, Pretoria.
The morphological analyses of the samples were carried out using a Zeiss MERLIN field-emission scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) at the Central Analytical Facilities (CAF), Stellenbosch University (SU), SA. The SDT Q600 thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry (TGA-DSC) analyser in the Department of Chemistry, University of Johannesburg (UJ) in Johannesburg, South Africa, was used for the thermal analysis. Ten milligram (10 mg) of the samples were heated from 25 • C to 1100 • C, at a rate of 10 • C /min [19]. Major element compositions of the bulk kaolin samples were determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry on a PANalytical Axios Wavelength Dispersive spectrometer (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) at the CAF, SU, SA. The machine is equipped with a 2.4 kW Rh anode X-ray tube and linked to a SuperQ PANalytical software.

Colour
The percentage colour distribution for the Cretaceous kaolins was dominated by light and pinkish grey, followed by light pink, reddish yellow and pale red, and pinkish white; whereas the Paleogene/Neogene kaolins were dominated by pale red followed by pinkish grey, reddish brown and light brown (Table 2 and Figure 3).

Mineral Compositions
In the Cretaceous kaolins, kaolinite was indicated as the predominant kaolin mineral, followed by quartz, muscovite, anatase, goethite and hematite; whereas in the Paleogene/Neogene kaolins, kaolinite was also predominant followed by quartz, anatase and goethite (Table 4, Figure 4). Anatase, goethite and hematite are the discolouring minerals in the studied kaolins that contain iron and titanium with abundances ranging from 1 to 2 wt%. In the Cretaceous kaolins, quartz and muscovite were the primary minerals present; whereas quartz was the only primary mineral present in the

Mineral Compositions
In the Cretaceous kaolins, kaolinite was indicated as the predominant kaolin mineral, followed by quartz, muscovite, anatase, goethite and hematite; whereas in the Paleogene/Neogene kaolins, kaolinite was also predominant followed by quartz, anatase and goethite (Table 4, Figure 4). Anatase, goethite and hematite are the discolouring minerals in the studied kaolins that contain iron and titanium with abundances ranging from 1 to 2 wt%. In the Cretaceous kaolins, quartz and muscovite were the primary minerals present; whereas quartz was the only primary mineral present in the Paleogene/Neogene kaolins. The main secondary minerals in the Cretaceous and Paleogene/Neogene kaolins were kaolinite, anatase and goethite (Table 4, Figure 4).  Figure 4).

Kaolinite Morphology
The SEM images displayed the various morphologies and textures of the studied Cretaceous-Paleogene/Neogene kaolins ( Figure 6). The Cretaceous kaolins, comprised of thin platy kaolinite particles with no stacks (Figure 6a,b), are comparable to the hard Paleogene/Neogene Georgia kaolins with thin platy particles with no large books or stacks [5]. However, the Paleogene/Neogene kaolins, characterised by pseudohexagonal stacks to books with thin platy particles (Figure 6c-f), are comparable to the soft Cretaceous Georgia kaolin with large coarse stacks interspersed in a matrix of finer platy particles, as well as the soft Late Cretaceous/Early Paleogene/Neogene Capim River kaolin with larger stacks [5].

Kaolinite Morphology
The SEM images displayed the various morphologies and textures of the studied Cretaceous-Paleogene/Neogene kaolins ( Figure 6). The Cretaceous kaolins, comprised of thin platy kaolinite particles with no stacks (Figure 6a,b), are comparable to the hard Paleogene/Neogene Georgia kaolins with thin platy particles with no large books or stacks [5]. However, the Paleogene/Neogene kaolins, characterised by pseudohexagonal stacks to books with thin platy particles (Figure 6c-f), are comparable to the soft Cretaceous Georgia kaolin with large coarse stacks interspersed in a matrix of finer platy particles, as well as the soft Late Cretaceous/Early Paleogene/Neogene Capim River kaolin with larger stacks [5].

Chemical Characteristics
The major oxide compositions of the Cretaceous-Paleogene/Neogene kaolins are presented in Table 5. The most abundant oxides were SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and TiO2; whereas MgO, CaO, Na2O and K2O were present in small quantities. The predominance of SiO2 and Al2O3 were mainly associated with quartz and kaolinite minerals. Fe2O3 and TiO2 are the main discolouring component. The presence of Fe2O3 and TiO2 can be associated with hematite, goethite and anatase minerals.

Chemical Characteristics
The major oxide compositions of the Cretaceous-Paleogene/Neogene kaolins are presented in   The loss on ignition (LOI) average values for Paleogene/Neogene kaolins were relatively lower than those for the Cretaceous kaolins. This is understandable since LOI is related to the dehydroxylation of kaolins, organic matter oxidation, and decomposition of carbonates and hydroxides [22].

Discussion
Raw kaolin colour and fired products have aesthetic importance in their application, particularly in ceramics [23]. Colours are imparted by colour-causing elements retained either in the structure of the kaolin mineral or as associated oxides (such as anatase, hematite and goethite) occurring with the kaolin mineral [24]. Clay minerals such as kaolin with Fe and Mg in its octahedral sites, contain less structural water; hence less energy will be required for dehydroxylation and less temperature for vitrification than usual. The lesser temperature is possible because Fe, Mg, Ca, Na and K oxides can act as fluxing agents [11,19,25].
The EC estimates the amounts of soluble salts (such as chlorides, phosphates, sulphates, carbonates and nitrates), which could cause severe problems in many applications [26,27]. In drying and firing of ceramic clay bodies, visible surface-scum due to the migration of soluble salts have been observed on the surface of vessels coupled with exfoliation and peeling of the surface under extensive crystallisation condition [24]. The relatively low EC values suggest little or no dissolved salts in the kaolins [26]. Chemically inert (pH range of 4-9) and low conductivity kaolins could be useful in the production of excellent fillers and extenders [5]. Considering the clayey nature of the samples in addition to the relatively low conductivity, production waste resulting from cracking due to shrinkage when fired would be low for ceramic applications [24].
The control of the sand, silt and clay fractions over porosity and permeability was assessed based on the ternary diagram of McManus [28] (Figure 7). The Lakiri kaolins plotted predominantly within the high porosity and very low permeability region (except for LP1 0 m); whereas the Eruku (except EP1 4 m and EP2 4 m), Awo-Omama, and Ubulu-Uku kaolins all plotted in the low porosity and low permeability region (Figure 7). Based on the Strazzera et al. [29] and Murray [5] criteria, the more fine-grained Cretaceous kaolins with higher porosity could be suitable to produce porous ceramic wares. The very low to low permeability is indicative of low cohesion and difficulty to extrude because moderate permeability will facilitate penetration of water into the kaolin, rendering its adsorption faster and more important. In addition, the water in the ceramic paste must provide enough cohesion to the ceramic body to equilibrate extrusion [27].
One of the most important factors in the industrial applications of kaolin is its plasticity. It is controlled by several factors, such as the particle size distribution, mineral composition and the presence of organic matter [30]. The PI and LL values for the Cretaceous-Paleogene/Neogene kaolins plotted on the Holtz and Kovacs diagram [31] (Figure 8a) shows that all the kaolins plotted in the medium plastic region except for two Paleogene/Neogene samples which are in the low (UL1) and high (AL2) regions. The slight differences in the plasticity of the studied kaolins are related to the differences in the abundance of silt and clay fractions. Higher clay and silt fractions give rise to relatively higher plasticity [30]. In addition, a moderate PI indicates moderate potential for swelling. However, excessive shrinkage is not expected since the PI values obtained were <35% [32]. Kaolins with PI < 10% are not suitable for building-related ceramic production due to the risk of problems such as unsuitable dimensional characteristics and cracks related to the visible variation in the amount of extrusion water [33,34]. Clays with low PI (7 < PI < 10) require the addition of polymers to obtain an adequate plastic behaviour and prevent cracking during extrusion [35,36]. Most of the studied kaolin have PI ≥ 10%. Hence, the Cretaceous-Paleogene/Neogene kaolins could possibly be used in their raw state to produce structural clay products by extrusion. Furthermore, the Casangrande chart ( Figure  8b) indicates that the studied kaolins are fit for brick making and possibly pottery wares. They predominantly plotted in the region of acceptable properties, except for sample LP1 that plotted Figure 7. Ternary diagram of studied Cretaceous (a) and Paleogene/Neogene (b) kaolins based on their sand, silt, clay fraction percentages (Fields after [28]).
One of the most important factors in the industrial applications of kaolin is its plasticity. It is controlled by several factors, such as the particle size distribution, mineral composition and the presence of organic matter [30]. The PI and LL values for the Cretaceous-Paleogene/Neogene kaolins plotted on the Holtz and Kovacs diagram [31] (Figure 8a) shows that all the kaolins plotted in the medium plastic region except for two Paleogene/Neogene samples which are in the low (UL1) and high (AL2) regions. One of the most important factors in the industrial applications of kaolin is its plasticity. It is controlled by several factors, such as the particle size distribution, mineral composition and the presence of organic matter [30]. The PI and LL values for the Cretaceous-Paleogene/Neogene kaolins plotted on the Holtz and Kovacs diagram [31] (Figure 8a) shows that all the kaolins plotted in the medium plastic region except for two Paleogene/Neogene samples which are in the low (UL1) and high (AL2) regions. The slight differences in the plasticity of the studied kaolins are related to the differences in the abundance of silt and clay fractions. Higher clay and silt fractions give rise to relatively higher plasticity [30]. In addition, a moderate PI indicates moderate potential for swelling. However, excessive shrinkage is not expected since the PI values obtained were <35% [32]. Kaolins with PI < 10% are not suitable for building-related ceramic production due to the risk of problems such as unsuitable dimensional characteristics and cracks related to the visible variation in the amount of extrusion water [33,34]. Clays with low PI (7 < PI < 10) require the addition of polymers to obtain an adequate plastic behaviour and prevent cracking during extrusion [35,36]. Most of the studied kaolin have PI ≥ 10%. Hence, the Cretaceous-Paleogene/Neogene kaolins could possibly be used in their raw state to produce structural clay products by extrusion. Furthermore, the Casangrande chart ( Figure  8b) indicates that the studied kaolins are fit for brick making and possibly pottery wares. They predominantly plotted in the region of acceptable properties, except for sample LP1 that plotted The slight differences in the plasticity of the studied kaolins are related to the differences in the abundance of silt and clay fractions. Higher clay and silt fractions give rise to relatively higher plasticity [30]. In addition, a moderate PI indicates moderate potential for swelling. However, excessive shrinkage is not expected since the PI values obtained were <35% [32]. Kaolins with PI < 10% are not suitable for building-related ceramic production due to the risk of problems such as unsuitable dimensional characteristics and cracks related to the visible variation in the amount of extrusion water [33,34]. Clays with low PI (7 < PI < 10) require the addition of polymers to obtain an adequate plastic behaviour and prevent cracking during extrusion [35,36]. Most of the studied kaolin have PI ≥ 10%. Hence, the Cretaceous-Paleogene/Neogene kaolins could possibly be used in their raw state to produce structural clay products by extrusion. Furthermore, the Casangrande chart (Figure 8b) indicates that the studied kaolins are fit for brick making and possibly pottery wares. They predominantly plotted in the region of acceptable properties, except for sample LP1 that plotted within the optimum properties region and samples EP2 and UL1, which plotted outside both the acceptable and optimum property regions.
Keller [37] described clays containing 3 wt% iron oxides with 1 to 3 wt% titania as useless to the ceramist. However, Pruett and Alves [38] reported that the beneficiation of a kaolin to nearly white is probable for kaolins containing a total of <6 wt% iron oxides and hydroxides, and titania. Iron could be associated with kaolinite by Fe substituting for Al in the octahedral sheet of the kaolinite and hence present in the kaolinite structure [39,40]. Iron has also been reported to be associated with rutile and anatase in some kaolins from Georgia, USA [41] and Egypt [42]. The possible precursor for the occurrence of anatase in sedimentary kaolin deposits have been suggested to be ilmenite and biotite minerals [43]. Known world sedimentary economic kaolin deposits such as Georgia kaolins, Capim River kaolins, and Maoming kaolins in USA, Brazil, and China respectively are currently mined for various industrial applications. The average kaolinite abundances obtained for the Cretaceous and Paleogene/Neogene kaolins (83 and 62 wt%, respectively) were lower relative to the soft Late Cretaceous/Early Paleogene/Neogene Capim River kaolin in Brazil (98 wt%) and the soft Cretaceous Georgia kaolin in USA (95 wt%) [44]; but higher than those for the Late Paleogene/Neogene Maoming kaolins in China (20-25 wt%) [5].
The exposure of raw kaolin material to the hot environment in a calciner with increasing temperature is accompanied by a few reactions (Equations (1) and (2)) such as dehydroxylation and phase transformations [45].
Between 450-700 • C: endothermic: dehydroxylation: Between 900-1000 • C: exothermic: transformation into crystalline phases: The dehydroxylation and mullite formation temperatures obtained for the Cretaceous-Paleogene/Neogene kaolins were lower than the corresponding average values of 576 • C and 1001 • C reported for Georgia kaolins [46]. The Cretaceous kaolins had higher average weight loss (13.6%) than the Paleogene/Neogene kaolins (12.2%) due to their relatively higher kaolinite content ( Table 4). The presence of higher quartz percentages in the Paleogene/Neogene kaolins also contributed to their lower average weight loss [47]. Weight losses accompanied by shrinkages due to exothermic and endothermic reactions in the kaolins have been reported [48]. Minimal shrinkage during firing of the kaolins as raw materials in ceramic processing is vital [47,49].
The occurrence of these kaolins as pseudohexagonal stacks to books and thin platy particles is suggestive of kaolin emplacement through weathering processes. In addition, kaolinite euhedral-subhedral-anhedral external forms and the irregular edges are characteristic of actively growing crystals [50]. The presence of non-uniform crystal sizes is typical of sedimentary kaolins. The absence of smaller and thinner packets or sheaves crystals typical of hydrothermally altered kaolins further affirms the formation of these kaolins from weathering processes [51]. In addition, the absence of tubular-shaped crystals confirms the absence of halloysite in the kaolins [49,52]. Kaolinite crystal forms directly affect properties such as brightness, glossiness and printability in paper coating [44]. The relatively finer particle sizes, coupled with the platy kaolinite shapes observed within the Cretaceous kaolins, are ideal for imparting a smooth and dense surface that is uniformly porous which will further give the paper a more uniform ink receptivity [5].
The average SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 ratios were 2.33 and 1.53 for Cretaceous Eruku and Lakiri kaolins and 5.69 and 2.76 for Paleogene/Neogene Awo-Omama and Ubulu-Uku kaolins. These SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 ratios were higher than the value for the ideal kaolinite (1.18) [53] and some commercially marketed sedimentary kaolins (Table 5) due to higher SiO 2 concentrations in the Cretaceous-Paleogene/Neogene kaolins. The average bulk TiO 2 , MgO, CaO, Na 2 O and K 2 O concentrations of the studied kaolins were comparable to the commercially marketed sedimentary kaolins; whereas Fe 2 O 3 concentrations were quite higher. However, the average LOI values varying from 6.87-12.57 wt% were lower than the LOI of ideal kaolinite (13.9) and that of commercially marketed sedimentary kaolins (Table 5).
Specifications related to the major oxides' data are very important for industrial applications of the kaolins. The average major oxides compositions of the studied Eruku, Awo-Omama and Ubulu-Uku kaolins compared with specifications for paper coating, paper filler, ceramics, pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries [20,21] showed that they cannot be used in their raw states without proper beneficiation (Table 5). However, Lakiri kaolin could be more suited for applications in the paper coating and ceramics industries except for TiO 2 and K 2 O contents ( Table 5). The use of high magnetic separators, possibly with other techniques such as flotation and/or selective flocculation will be effective in refining the kaolins to increase their commercial uses [5,54].

Conclusions
This study determined the physico-chemical, mineralogical and chemical compositions of the studied kaolins. The kaolins were considered to contain little or no soluble salts which can cause exfoliation and peeling of the surfaces of ceramic clay bodies. The Cretaceous kaolins were more clayey than the Paleogene/Neogene kaolins. Hence, from their particle size distribution, the Lakiri kaolins were found to be highly porous with very low permeability; whereas the Eruku, Awo-Omama, and Ubulu-Uku kaolins have low porosity and permeability, which have implications for the cohesion and extrusion of the kaolins when used in the ceramic industry. Medium plasticity for the Cretaceous and Paleogene/Neogene kaolins suggests moderate potential for swelling. The PI ≥ 10% values obtained were appropriate for building related ceramic productions particularly in brick making and possibly pottery wares without extrusion. In addition, PI < 35% suggest that excessive shrinkage is not expected. Weight losses, if accompanied by shrinkages, would affect the use of the kaolins in ceramic processing during firing. The platy morphology, particularly in the Cretaceous kaolins, is ideal for imparting better paper quality.
For paper coating, paper filler, ceramics, pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries, the Cretaceous Eruku and Paleogene/Neogene Awo-Omama and Ubulu-Uku kaolins are unsuitable as raw materials due to their chemical compositions. However, the Cretaceous Lakiri kaolins could be suitable in the paper coating and ceramic industries except for their TiO 2 and K 2 O contents. To improve the commercial usage of the kaolins, beneficiation would be required.