Pyrite Textures, Trace Elements and Sulfur Isotope Chemistry of Bijaigarh Shales, Vindhyan Basin, India and Their Implications

: The Vindhyan Basin in central India preserves a thick (~5 km) sequence of sedimentary and lesser volcanic rocks that provide a valuable archive of a part of the Proterozoic (~1800–900 Ma) in India. Here, we present an analysis of key sedimentary pyrite textures and their trace element and sulfur isotope compositions in the Bijaigarh Shale (1210 ± 52 Ma) in the Vindhyan Supergroup, using reﬂected light microscopy, LA-ICP-MS and SHRIMP-SI, respectively. A variety of sedimentary pyrite textures (ﬁne-grained disseminated to aggregates, framboids, lags, and possibly microbial pyrite textures) are observed reﬂecting quiet and strongly anoxic water column conditions punctuated by occasional high-energy events (storm incursions). Key redox sensitive or sensitive to oxidative weathering trace elements (Co, Ni, Zn, Mo, Se) and ratios of (Se / Co, Mo / Co, Zn / Co) measured in sedimentary pyrites from the Bijaigarh Shale are used to infer atmospheric redox conditions during its deposition. Most trace elements are depleted relative to Proterozoic mean values. Sulfur isotope compositions of pyrite, measured using SHRIMP-SI, show an increase in δ 34 S as we move up stratigraphy with positive δ 34 S values ranging from 5.9% (cid:24) (lower) to 26.08% (cid:24) (upper). We propose limited sulphate supply caused the pyrites to incorporate the heavier isotope. Overall, we interpret these low trace element signatures and heavy sulfur isotope compositions to indicate relatively suppressed oxidative weathering on land during the deposition of the Bijaigarh Shale. SHRIMP-SI Pyrite Sulfur isotope composition in the


Introduction
Several Paleo-Mesoproterozoic and some Neoproterozoic intracratonic basins with thick platformal siliciclastic-carbonate lithologies cover extensive parts of peninsular India. The largest amongst these is the Vindhyan Basin in the Northern Cratonic Block of the peninsular shield (Figure 1 inset). This basin in Central India, comprises a dominantly flat-lying, undeformed and unmetamorphosed sedimentary package (including some volcanics) that wrap around the Archean (>2.5 Ga) Bundelkhand massif in a semicircle to the north and abut against the Paleoproterozoic Aravalli orogenic belt to the northwest, the Cretaceous Deccan Traps to the southwest and the Paleoproterozoic rocks of the Satpura mobile belt in the southeast. Structurally, the basin is divided into a number of sub-basins, the biggest amongst which are the Rajasthan sector in the west and Son Valley sector in Uttar Pradesh-Madhya  [25] showing the two main sectors: Rajasthan in the west and Son valley in the east. The inset shows the different Proterozoic basins in India and the location of the Vindhyan basin in the northern cratonic block.

Geological Background
The Vindhyan Basin, like other "Purana" basins in India, is generally considered to have developed as a failed rift basin in Archean to early Paleoproterozoic basement rocks [26]. Tholeiitic magmatism around 1800 Ma in Bijawar, Sonrai and Gwalior areas, encircling the Vindhyan Basin, bear evidence of the extensional growth of the initial rifts. Most workers now agree that the Vindhyan sediments were deposited in a westward-opening epicontinental basin in an intracratonic setting [27,28].

Stratigraphy and Age
Stratigraphically, the Vindhyan Basin is divided into the Paleoproterozoic Lower Vindhyan and the mostly Mesoproterozoic Upper Vindhyan (Figure 2), separated from each other by a basin-wide unconformity [25]. The Lower Vindhyan is represented by the Semri Group of rocks which unconformably overlie either the 1854 ± 7 Ma Hindoli Group of rocks [29] of the Aravalli belt or the 2492 ± 10 Ma Bundelkhand granites [30]. The Semri Group comprises an alternating sequence of shales, carbonates, and patchy sandstones along with two known periods of volcanic activity, with the Porcellanite Formation being the most conspicuous. The Upper Vindhyan constitutes the Kaimur, Rewa, and Bhander Groups with sandstones, shales, and marls, and volcanic activity recorded at the base of the Rewa Group. Rocks of the Kaimur Group are also intruded by diamond-bearing kimberlites and lamproites. The depositional age of the Vindhyan sequence has received a lot of world attention in recent years. The Lower Vindhyan sediments are now well constrained to the Paleoproterozoic betweeñ 1800-1600 Ma through a number of radiometric studies ( Figure 2) on the Kajrahat Limestone [31]; Porcellanite Fm. [2]; Rampur Shale [32]; and Rohtas Limestone [33,34], mostly based on the U-Pb and Pb-Pb dating techniques. In contrast, sediments from the Upper Vindhyan (Kaimur, Rewa and Bhander groups) still lack robust chronological control [35]. In the Son valley, a basin wide unconformity exists between the Rohtas Limestone of the Lower Vindhyan and the overlying Upper Vindhyan's, Kaimur Group, which is represented by a lower shale unit and an upper quartz-rich sandstone including a volcaniclastic deposit [36]. Amongst the three groups, the Kaimur Group is best constrained mainly due to a recent bulk rock Re-Os isochron depositional age of 1210 ± 52 Ma for the Bijaigarh Shale [24] in the middle part of the group. The Majhgawan kimberlite pipe, which cuts across the Semri and Kaimur groups and is exposed near Panna within upper Kaimur (Baghain) sandstones, has an emplacement age of 1073 ± 13.7 Ma [4]. This constrains the age of the uppermost Kaimur Group to the Mesoproterozoic and suggests that the Rewa and Bhander groups may represent Neoproterozoic sequences. Detrital zircon analysis of the Upper Bhander Sandstone [3] on the other hand identifies a youngest age population at~1020 Ma. Depositional age for the uppermost Bhander Group has recently been constrained by Pb-Pb dating of three carbonate horizons by [37] at~900 Ma ( Figure 2). This short summary of geochronologic data of Vindhyan Supergroup rocks brackets its age between Late Paleoproterozoic and Early Neoproterozoic, with a substantial part of the Upper Vindhyan sequence deposited in the Mesoproterozoic.

Bijaigarh Shale
The Bijaigarh Shale is a laterally persistent unit of organic matter-rich black shale in the Kaimur Group, up to 70 m in thickness, sandwiched between the lower Kaimur Sandstone below and the upper Kaimur Sandstone above ( Figure 2). The thickness of the unit decreases towards the west and the unit pinches out west of Chopan [38]. A pyritiferous horizon divides this shale unit into a lower shale (average thickness 32 m) and a top shale (average thickness 15 m) [39], best developed at Amjhore, about 20 km south of Dehri-on-Son, in the Vindhyan hills of Rohtas district, Bihar ( Figure 1). Here, the pyritic shale occurs as a 0.78 m-thick stratiform horizon within the carbonaceous shales extending over an area of 2.1 km 2 . The uniform thickness as well as the conformable nature of the pyrite bed with the overlying and underlying carbonaceous shale is a conspicuous feature throughout. The bottom shale has fine intercalations of sandstones and siltstones, is less carbonaceous (TOC: 1.53-1.89%, [39]) and shows gradational contact with the lower Kaimur Sandstone. The upper shale, on the other hand, contains only a few siltstone beds, but is more carbonaceous (TOC: 3.83-4.15%, [39]). A transitional zone of siltstone and argillaceous sandstone is reported [40] to host some galena mineralization near the upper contact of the Bijaigarh Shale with Kaimur Sandstone.
Sedimentary pyrite exhibits syn-depositional features within the carbonaceous Bijaigarh Shale [22,41,42], and attains substantial local concentration in the form of lenses and beds at Amjhore, where a pyrite mine (24 • 43 36.9 N; 83 • 59 40.3 E) was operated by Pyrites, Phosphate and Chemicals Ltd. (PPCL), a Government of India undertaking, until 2003. The top shale above the pyrite bed also has abundant pyrite disseminations and minute pyrite-rich laminae whereas the bottom shale below the orebody contains fewer disseminated pyrite. All features cumulatively suggest a deeper environment of deposition for the upper shale unit. The sediments of the Kaimur Group of rocks were deposited in a terrestrial setting, and their environment of deposition changed from alluvial fan, braided plain, fan delta to lacustrine facies [43]. The Bijaigarh Shale within the Kaimur Group is the only stratigraphic horizon to manifest a strongly anoxic environment with profuse biogenic activity, as evidenced by the prevalence of pyritiferous carbonaceous sediments. It has been considered to represent a lagoonal deposit with an open ocean connection in some studies [24,44] and inner to outer shelf by others [45]. Based on several sedimentological features, a study [46] proposed that the Bijaigarh Shale is a shelf deposit below fair-weather wave base, formed as a result of maximum flooding following a transgressive systems tract (TST), when the Vindhyan Basin was an epicratonic sea with an open ocean connection to the northwest. Presence of features like profuse gutter casts suggest intermittent storm incursions during the deposition of the Bijaigarh Shale within the overall transgressive framework [47].

Methods
The pyrite bed and the immediate bottom and top carbonaceous shales were sampled in two adjacent adits which are accessible in the erstwhile Amjhore mine. A total of nine samples were collected in vertical profiles, out of which seven samples with high to low pyrite content were studied in detail ( Figure 3). The two samples rejected did not have any discernible pyrite.

LA-ICP-MS Pyrite Analyses
Polished 1-inch laser mounts (pieces of rock mounted in epoxy) were used for reflected light microscopy prior to trace element analyses (66 pyrite analyses) using the LA-ICP-MS facility at CODES, University of Tasmania. Analyses were performed in a time-resolved mode using ASI RESOlution Laser Ablation System comprising of CompexPro 110 ArF Excimer laser (193 nm wavelength, 20 ns pulse width) equipped with S155 Laurin Technic cell (Canberra, Australia) and coupled to an Agilent 7700 ICP-MS (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Each analysis consisted of 30 s background and 60 s of ablation signal acquisition in counts per second (cps). Ablation was performed at energy density of 2.7 J/cm 2 and 5 Hz laser repetition rate, dwell times varying between 5 and 50 ms, depending on the count rates and total sweep time (time required to measure all isotopes once) of 0.76 s. Ablation was carried out in pure He atmosphere, introduced at a rate of 0.35 l/min in the ablation cell after which Ar was mixed with a rate of 1.05 l/min for improved efficiency of aerosol transport. Primary reference materials (STDGL2b2 glass, GSD-1G glass and pyrite crystal) were analysed every 1.5 h (after analyses of two samples) in order to quantify and correct for the drift in the sensitivity of the instrument. STDGL2b2 is an in-house standard used for primary calibration for quantifying siderophile and chalcophile elements [48]; GSD-1G (USGS reference material; [49] was used to quantify lithophile elements; sulfur was quantified using massive pyrite with stoichiometric Fe and S (46.5 wt.% Fe, 53.5 wt.% S). Approximately, 10 pyrite spot analyses and 5 black shale matrix spot analyses were conducted on each laser mount with 29 µ spot size. Due to the fine-grained nature of the sedimentary pyrites, matrix material of the black shales was analysed for trace elements, in order to negate effects of matrix contamination during laser ablation of fine-grained pyrite. Sedimentary pyrites and matrix were analyzed for 13 C, 23 Na, 24 Mg, 27 Al, 29 Si, 34 S, 39 K, 43 Ca, 49 Ti, 51 V, 53 Cr, 55 Mn, 57 Fe, 59 Co, 60 Ni,  Table S1. Raw LA-ICP-MS generated-data, in counts per seconds were converted into parts per million (ppm) using CODES in-house data reduction software according to [50].

SHRIMP Sulfur Isotopes
Sulfur isotope compositions (δ 34 S and ∆ 33 S) were measured in-situ in pyrite with the SHRIMP-SI ion microprobe at the Research School of Earth Sciences, the Australian National University (ANU). The mounts were cleaned using ethanol, a dilute alkaline cleaning solution, and de-ionised water and dried in a vacuum oven at 60 • C for 24 h, prior to analyses. Mounts were coated with ca. of 10 nm of Au before being placed into a steel holder for insertion into the SHRIMP sample lock. A Cs + primary beam of~2 nA was focused to sputter an area of~25 µm in diameter on the Au-coated target surface. Faraday cups were used for simultaneous detection of 32 S − , 33 S − and 34 S − . Signals of 32 S − were collected on a 10 11 Ω resistor (50 V range), 33 S − and 34 S − on 10 11 Ω resistors (5 V range).
Unknown pyrite analyses were bracketed by measurements of pyrite reference material Balmat (δ 34 S = +15.1 ± 0.2% , [53,54]. The measured 33 S/ 32 S and 34 S/ 32 S ratios, were corrected for instrumental mass fractionation, and expressed here in standard delta notation in permil (% ) relative to V-CDT (VCDT-Vienna-Canyon Diablo Troilite), with: Capital delta values (∆ 33 S) were calculated following [53], where: Internal precision of single spot analyses of δ 34 S and ∆ 33 S were generally better than 0.1% and 0.3% (2 SE; SE = standard error), respectively. Repeatability of δ 34 S and ∆ 33 S values ranged between 0.2 and 0.3% . These values were calculated as the 1 sigma standard deviation (SD) of all analyses on the Balmat reference material over the course of an analytical session.

Pyrite Textures Using Reflected Light Microscopy
A textural study of the pyrite grains using reflected light microscopy was undertaken for two reasons. First, sedimentary pyrite textures can provide clues to the depositional conditions including redox, water column stratification, energy conditions, and microbial activity, as highlighted in several previous studies [6,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. Second, pyrite textures were carefully recorded prior to LA-ICP-MS analyses in order to ensure only sedimentary to early-diagenetic pyrites were analysed for the study.
The pyrite bed in Amjhore is characterised by two different varieties of pyrite: a cryptocrystalline massive type and a disseminated type. The bulk of the pyrite belongs to the former type and comprises Minerals 2020, 10, 588 7 of 19 pyrite spheroids and idiomorphic pyrite crystals within a groundmass of cryptocrystalline pyrite. The disseminated type is made up of dense agglomerations of framboidal pyrite and disseminated subhedral to euhedral grains of pyrite in the carbonaceous shale, with the pyrite spherules ranging in diameter from 100 to 1200 µm [22,41,64]. It also comprises pyritic clasts, either dispersed or concentrated in patches and bands.
This study focused on the disseminated pyrite types and identified various sedimentary pyrite textures in the Bijaigarh Shale. Most common are the fine-grained disseminations of sedimentary pyrite grains in carbonaceous shale, including aggregates of fine-grained pyrite coalesced in sub-rounded to elongated patches parallel to the bedding plane ( Figure 4a).Within such bedding foliation, sometimes wavy, framboids of pyrite are also noted (Figure 4b), which have also been described in previous studies of Amjhore pyrite [22,23,65]. In some samples, partial (  Overall, a variety of sedimentary textures (possibly of both biotic and abiotic origins) characterize pyritic textures in the sulfidic horizon and also in the lower and upper shales. Interpretation of these textures and several possible formation mechanisms are discussed in a later section (refer textural implications). The order in which these textures are observed and occur across the pyrite bed i.e., from the top of the bottom carbonaceous shale to the pyrite bed to the upper carbonaceous shale, is interesting to note ( Figure 8). As mentioned above, fine-grained pyrite in layers, aggregates (including framboidal), and fine disseminations of microcrystals of pyrite occur all through the section. Black shales underlying the basal pyrite bed are relatively pyrite-poor compared to all other samples and pyrite mainly occurs as microcrystals disseminated in the shale. Further up stratigraphy into the pyrite bed, we observe a very pyritic shale with pyrite spheres and lenses including lag deposits where some individual pyrite clasts are fairly well rounded ( Figure 8). In these samples, we also observe spherical concretions and stromatolite-like structures ( Figure 8). Closer to the contact between the pyrite bed and upper carbonaceous shale, we observe textures like pyrite infillings and lenses that are possible geopetal structures. The upper shale exhibits streaks of fine-grained pyrite in repetitive layers. Close to the clay band, we observe another pyrite lag deposit where pyritised clasts (possibly bioclasts) are plentiful (Figure 8).

Pyrite Trace Element Chemistry
Redox sensitive trace elements in black shales [11,13,65] and more recently, in sedimentary pyrites [16,20], have been used to interpret paleoredox conditions in the ocean and atmosphere. In this study, we measured key trace elements (Ni, Co, Cu, Se, Mo, Zn, Pb, Tl) in sedimentary pyrite using LA-ICP-MS to provide additional insights into the evolving depositional conditions during the formation of the Bijaigarh Shale. Pyrite trace element analyses for fine grained disseminated pyrite and the coarse pyrite lags are presented separately in Tables S1 and S2.
The fine-grained variety of pyrite in the Bijaigarh Shale unit exhibits slightly higher concentrations of Ni, Cu, Mo, and high concentrations of Zn compared with their coarser counterparts (Table S2). Mean Ni, Cu, and Mo in fine grained pyrite are 288 ppm, 155 ppm, and 57 ppm, respectively, compared to mean values of 134 ppm, 82 ppm, and 30 ppm, respectively, in coarser varieties. Mean Zn is 100 ppm in finer grained pyrites compared to 35 ppm in coarser varieties. Selenium, Co and Tl remain roughly the same in both varieties (Table S2); mean Se, Co and Tl in fine grained pyrite are 15 ppm, 340 ppm and 16 respectively, and in coarser grains are 11 ppm, 289 ppm and 10 ppm respectively. Very high Pb concentrations are noted in the coarse pyrite lags (~1300 ppm) compared to the finer grained variety (~200 ppm) ( Table S2). Ratios of Se/Co, Ni/Co, Mo/Co, Zn/Co are also~2-3 times higher in finer grained pyrites compared to coarser varieties (Table S2).
Mean of trace element concentrations of both pyrite types and their ratios in this study have been compared with the mean of~4700 sedimentary pyrite analyses categorized into different time spans i.e., Phanerozoic, Proterozoic, and Archean [16,18,19] (Table S3). This was mainly done to compare the pyrites from the Bijaigarh Shale with sedimentary pyrites of varying ages (Table S3). Mean concentrations of trace elements and their ratios in the Bijaigarh Shale unit are significantly lower than the Phanerozoic sedimentary pyrites [16,18] except Co and Tl which are only slightly lower. Concentration of Pb however, is higher in the Bijaigarh pyrites relative to the Phanerozoic. When compared to the Proterozoic average, trace element concentrations and their ratios are also lower in the Bijaigarh pyrites. Cobalt, Ni, Cu concentrations, Ni/Co, Zn/Co in the Bijaigarh Shale unit are also significantly lower compared to the Archean, with Zn, Se, Se/Co being only slightly lower. Molybdenum, Tl, Pb, and Mo/Co are slightly higher in the Bijaigarh Shale unit compared to the Archean.

Sulfur Isotopes (SHRIMP_SI)
Three samples from different stratigraphic levels of the Bijaigarh Shale Unit (AJ15/3iii: lower; AJ/4i: middle; AJ15/1: upper) were selected for sulfur isotope measurements. Pyrite sulfur isotope compositions compliment trace element chemistry as they provide additional evidence for depositional redox conditions. A total of 45 analyses were undertaken in the three samples (Table S4).

Textural Implications
The Bijaigarh Shale, particularly the pyrite bed and the upper carbonaceous shale, exhibits a variety of textures possibly recording the various depositional conditions operative during its formation. Sedimentation commenced in an oxygen-poor environment, created as a result of decomposition of high levels of organic matter. Assuming an authigenic supply of Fe (from the sediments or water column), bacterial sulphate reduction in the sediment/water column led to the formation of microcrystals of pyrite as evidenced by the pyrite disseminations in the lower carbonaceous shale. With subsequent deposition of abundant organic matter, oxygen was entirely consumed; further bacterial sulphate reduction combined with a steady supply of Fe, the shale became more pyritic. This is indicated by the formation of pyrite in layers and aggregates grading into massive pyrite layers, i.e., the pyrite bed.
Occasional reworking of the sediments possibly caused the formation of the pyrite lags. This could be attributed to high-energy storm incursions during sedimentation. Other sedimentological studies in the formation (tidal bundles, gutter casts, etc.) also confirm such disruptive events [7,36,47]. When such high-energy events were absent, pyrite formed in layers and aggregates as commonly observed in all the samples. One could argue that the pyrite clasts in the lag deposit were derived from a distant source and not the Bijaigarh Shale. However, if that was the case, then we would expect significant differences in pyrite trace element concentrations in samples (e.g., AJ/15/1) where both fine-grained and pyrite lag were analysed (Tables S1 and S2). The data does not support this situation and we interpret the lags to be derived as a result of reworking of the underlying pyrite laminations.
Textural evidence suggests that some clasts within the pyrite lags may be biogenic (Figure 7). It is possible that pyrite precipitation occurred on surfaces of microbial remnants (hard or soft parts?), manifested in the form of pyritised bioclasts and pyrite infillings. A biogenic origin of these clasts is highly likely, supported by two features: high TOC% (3-4%) observed in the Bijaigarh Shale unit [39] and the characteristic shapes of these clasts. It is also possible that the spherical clasts are abiogenic and have formed due to extensive reworking. It is interesting to note that these spherical/rounded clasts co-occur with non-spherical clasts. Therefore, extensive reworking could not have caused sphericity/roundness in selective clasts only. Also, phosphatic concretions and microbial mat formation has been described from the Bijaigarh shale in previous studies [23,66]. Concretions and stromatolite-like structures have been noted in Figure 6a,b as well, which points towards a biogenic origin for these clasts.
The textural study investigated if pyrite texture types may explain their trace element content. Trace elements may be adsorbed into the structure of pyrite (chemiabsorbed onto the defect sites of Fe and S on the pyrite surface) or may be incorporated as inclusions within pyrite [64]. A number of chemical factors may control trace element uptake by pyrite along with both thermodynamic as well as kinetic influences [67]. These chemical factors include electronic configuration of an element, oxidation state, ligand field stabilization energies, water exchange rates and reactivity to chemical species (hydroxide/chloride/sulphide) relative to Fe [67]. For instance, elements like Zn, Cd, Pb have higher water exchange rates relative to Fe, due to weak to no ligand field stabilization energy (owing to electronic configuration). Higher water exchanges rates of Zn, Cd and Pb facilitates their sulphide formation. These elements occur as sulphide inclusions within pyrite [67]. On the other hand, elements like Ni and Co have slow water exchange rates compared to Fe, which precludes their sulphide formation and are adsorbed into the structure of the pyrite [67]. It should be noted that regardless of the mechanism of incorporation, trace element availability in the water column is an important prerequisite. Syngenetic pyrite trace element content may be a good measure of the trace element availability. However, subsequent transformation of syngenetic pyrite may alter the original trace element content. We speculated if pyrite morphologies may explain differences in trace element concentrations and their ratios observed in fine-grained pyrite vs pyrite lag textures. Most trace elements except Pb are enriched in the finer grained variety of pyrite relative to the coarser variety. Minor recrystallization of the coarse pyrite during diagenesis and lag formation may be the cause, as noted in other black shale formations [16]. However, in one sample (AJ15/1) where both types of pyrites were analysed, little differences were observed. This is why we conclude here that the variation is possibly due to changes in depositional conditions upstratigraphy. A note of caution on this conclusion as it is based on just one sample and may be speculated in future studies.

Atmospheric Redox Implications (Pyrite-Trace Elements)
Trace element concentrations, such as Mo, Se, Co, Zn, Ni, Cu, Pb, Tl and certain trace element ratios (Se/Co, Mo/Co, Zn/Co) are used here to interpret paleo-atmospheric redox condition during the deposition of the Bijaigarh Shale. This is based on the fact that oxidative weathering on land releases these trace elements into the riverine flux, which is a dominant source of these trace elements in the marine system [13,15,16,[68][69][70][71][72]. However, Co relative to Se, Mo, Ni, Zn is retained by Fe-Mn oxides and hydroxides on land, which decreases its supply in the riverine flux during oxygenation. Whilst Mo, Se, Ni, and Zn should increase in concentrations in sedimentary pyrite due to progressive oxygenation on land, Co generally shows an opposite trend [20]. Any increase in the former should be accompanied by decrease in Co; therefore, ratios of Se/Co, Mo/Co, and Zn/Co are considered as robust paleo-indicators of atmospheric oxygenation. Apart from oxidative weathering, provenance of the sediments also bears a control on the type of trace element flux. Trace element patterns in this study will be discussed in light of these two trace element source parameters.
Most trace element concentrations and their ratios are below or close to the mean values for the Proterozoic, indicated in Figures 9-11 by the dashed line, which is not uncommon for Proterozoic black shales. Several studies have indicated that low atmospheric oxygen during the Proterozoic has resulted in suppressed trace element signatures in black shales [7,13,15,16].    [19]; red squares-pyrite lag; black circles-fine-grained pyrite.  of the sediments also bears a control on the type of trace element flux. Trace element patterns in this study will be discussed in light of these two trace element source parameters. Most trace element concentrations and their ratios are below or close to the mean values for the Proterozoic, indicated in Figures 9-11 by the dashed line, which is not uncommon for Proterozoic black shales. Several studies have indicated that low atmospheric oxygen during the Proterozoic has resulted in suppressed trace element signatures in black shales [7,13,15,16].    [19]; red squares-pyrite lag; black circles-fine-grained pyrite.
Other oxygenation proxies such as Se/Co, Mo/Co, and Zn/Co are all below the Proterozoic mean value (Figure 11) indicating an absence of any significant oxygenation. Ratios of Se/Co and Mo/Co of   [19]; red squares-pyrite lag; black circles-fine-grained pyrite.
Archean. This implies lower atmospheric oxygen levels at ~1.2 Ga relative to the Phanerozoic but higher than the Archean (Figure 12). Ratios were also compared with pyrites from Neo-Meso-Paleoproterozoic to demonstrate that the data fits in well with the average Proterozoic analyses ( Figure 13).    [19]; red squares-pyrite lag; black circles-fine-grained pyrite.
Other oxygenation proxies such as Se/Co, Mo/Co, and Zn/Co are all below the Proterozoic mean value ( Figure 11) indicating an absence of any significant oxygenation. Ratios of Se/Co and Mo/Co of the Bijaigarh Shale unit have also been compared to Archean and Phanerozoic ( Figure 12). It is evident that although values are significantly lower than the Phanerozoic, they are higher than the Archean. This implies lower atmospheric oxygen levels at~1.2 Ga relative to the Phanerozoic but higher than the Archean (Figure 12). Ratios were also compared with pyrites from Neo-Meso-Paleoproterozoic to demonstrate that the data fits in well with the average Proterozoic analyses ( Figure 13).

Atmospheric Redox Implications (Pyrite-Sulfur Isotopes)
In order to have further insights into the redox state of the depositional conditions of the Bijaigarh shales, sulfur isotope compositions of three samples were studied. An increase in δ 34 S pyrite values up stratigraphy in the Bijaigarh Shale was observed, which could be interpreted in several ways ( Figure 14). First, it may represent a transition from a partially closed to a closed system depositional conditions, with progressively heavier values as we move up stratigraphy. That is because progressive cessation of open ocean connection would hinder fresh injections of sulphate for reduction. This will result in the seawater being more enriched in 34 S after 32 S has been exhausted. Following that, the pyrites will progressively incorporate the heavier isotope. Alternatively, an overall decrease in pO 2 of the atmosphere-ocean system as discussed above, would also impede the supply of the sulphate in the oceans and therefore causing the pyrites to incorporate the heavier isotope ( 34 S) due Rayleigh fractionation. Important to note here is the absence of negative δ 34 S pyrite values, which may also imply lower seawater sulphate that may have been bacterially reduced to pyrite with heavier values. Our data is also consistent with observations made by [7,41], where a combination of closed system, anoxic ocean conditions, and lower marine sulphate concentrations (owing to lower oxidative weathering) were proposed for the Bijaigarh Shale.

Summary
Pyrite trace element concentrations and their ratios in the Bijaigarh Shale are well below the global Proterozoic mean values (except Pb enrichment in the clay band). Sulphur isotope ratios of pyrite ( 34 Spyrite) exhibit an increase in upstratigraphy. The combination of the pyrite trace element and sulphur isotope characteristics in the Bijaigarh Shale suggest a few possibilities. First, lack of sufficient oxidative weathering on land led to a decreased supply of trace elements and sulphate in the marine system via riverine flux rendering the trace element values in pyrite to be lower than or similar to the Proterozoic mean values and heavier  34 Spyrite values, respectively. Although, it should be noted that a recent study by [19] indicated ~7-8% PAL (Present Atmospheric Level) of O2 wt.% during the Mesoproterozoic, i.e., 0.38 PAL, much higher than 0.002 PAL suggested by [72]. Therefore, the decrease in oxygenation referred in this study is relative to the time prior to the deposition of Bijaigarh Shale. It is possible that provenance played a role in controlling the trace element patterns in the Bijaigarh Shale. A dominantly felsic provenance (post-Archean Proterozoic in age), is proposed for the Upper Kaimur Group on the basis of various geochemical discriminants, elemental ratios, like K2O/Na2O, Al2O3/TiO2, SiO2/MgO, La/Sc, Th/Sc, Th/Cr, GdN/YbN and pronounced negative Eu anomalies [73]. The felsic provenance for the Kaimur Group (including the Bijaigarh Shale) combined with relatively low oxidative weathering may have caused the low trace element concentration in pyrites as observed in this study. That is because most redox sensitive and nutrient trace elements (Ni, Co, Mn, Cu, Zn, Se, V) are relatively enriched in mafic rocks compared to felsic rocks [74]. Elements like Mo and Tl however, are slightly more enriched in felsic compared to mafics [74].

Summary
Pyrite trace element concentrations and their ratios in the Bijaigarh Shale are well below the global Proterozoic mean values (except Pb enrichment in the clay band). Sulphur isotope ratios of pyrite (δ 34 S pyrite ) exhibit an increase in upstratigraphy. The combination of the pyrite trace element and sulphur isotope characteristics in the Bijaigarh Shale suggest a few possibilities. First, lack of sufficient oxidative weathering on land led to a decreased supply of trace elements and sulphate in the marine system via riverine flux rendering the trace element values in pyrite to be lower than or similar to the Proterozoic mean values and heavier δ 34 S pyrite values, respectively. Although, it should be noted that a recent study by [19] indicated~7-8% PAL (Present Atmospheric Level) of O 2 wt.% during the Mesoproterozoic, i.e., 0.38 PAL, much higher than 0.002 PAL suggested by [72]. Therefore, the decrease in oxygenation referred in this study is relative to the time prior to the deposition of Bijaigarh Shale. It is possible that provenance played a role in controlling the trace element patterns in the Bijaigarh Shale. A dominantly felsic provenance (post-Archean Proterozoic in age), is proposed for the Upper Kaimur Group on the basis of various geochemical discriminants, elemental ratios, like K 2 O/Na 2 O, Al 2 O 3 /TiO 2 , SiO 2 /MgO, La/Sc, Th/Sc, Th/Cr, Gd N /Yb N and pronounced negative Eu anomalies [73]. The felsic provenance for the Kaimur Group (including the Bijaigarh Shale) combined with relatively low oxidative weathering may have caused the low trace element concentration in pyrites as observed in this study. That is because most redox sensitive and nutrient trace elements (Ni, Co, Mn, Cu, Zn, Se, V) are relatively enriched in mafic rocks compared to felsic rocks [74]. Elements like Mo and Tl however, are slightly more enriched in felsic compared to mafics [74].

Conclusions
This study involved understanding sedimentary pyrite textures, their trace element and sulphur isotope ratios to reflect on paleo-redox conditions during the deposition of the Bijaigarh Shale unit in the Mesoproterozoic. Sedimentary pyrite textures indicate variable depositional conditions for the Bijaigarh Shale. Deposition began with fine-grained pyrite disseminations in layers and aggregates, suggesting a quiet, low energy environment and mildly reducing water column conditions. With subsequent enhancement of organic matter deposition and its decomposition, the water column gradually became more strongly reducing and potentially, a closed system, resulting in the formation of the pyrite bed. Occasional reworking of the pyrite bed during storm incursions caused the pyrite lags to form. Overall, low concentrations of the trace elements particularly Se and Mo and their ratios (i.e., below the global mean values for the Proterozoic) suggest relatively low oxygen conditions during the deposition of the Bijaigarh Shale. Decreasing oxygenation and closure of open ocean connection during deposition of the unit, potentially caused a lower input of sulfate in the ocean resulting in 34 Srich-seawater and subsequently an increase in δ 34 S pyrite values upstratigraphy. Owing to partial ocean connectivity of the Vindhyan Basin during the deposition of the lower part of the Bijaigarh Shale (1210 ± 52 Ma), there remains a possibility of extrapolating these paleoredox conditions for a more global context in the Mesoproterozoic.