Previous Article in Journal
Bridging Heritage Systems: Multi-Scale Spatial Coupling Between Tangible and Intangible Cultural Heritage in China Using Hierarchical Bayesian Model and Causal Inference
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comprehensive Urban Assessment and Major Function Verification Based on City Examination: The Case of Hubei Province
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Does Government Embedment Enhance Villagers’ Willingness to Mutually Supervise Rural Residential Land Utilization?

Wenjiang District Urban Modern Agriculture High-Tech Industry Promotion Service Center, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2025, 14(12), 2387; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14122387 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 20 October 2025 / Revised: 2 December 2025 / Accepted: 4 December 2025 / Published: 6 December 2025

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to clarify the impact of government embedment on villagers’ willingness to engage in mutual supervision of rural residential land utilization. It also examines the role of local elders’ involvement in this process, with the goal of improving the regulatory framework for rural residential land utilization. The data used in this study are sourced from a field survey of 450 rural households in Sichuan Province, China. Data analysis was conducted using Logit, Probit, and moderation effect models, among others. The results show the following: (1) Organizational Embedment significantly enhances villagers’ willingness to participate in mutual supervision, with government-established regulatory bodies and dedicated management personnel effectively incentivizing oversight participation. (2) Due to social risks in actual supervision, Ideological Embedment fails to effectively stimulate supervisory behavior. (3) The effects of Government Embedment vary significantly across villages in different geographic locations. (4) The involvement of local elders enhances the effectiveness of Government Organizational Embedment, with their role in rural residential land governance leaning more toward practical implementation than conceptual dissemination. The findings of this study are as follows: Against the backdrop of government administrative embedment in rural residential land governance, the involvement of local elders has played a significant role in enhancing effectiveness. Efforts should continue to focus on strengthening organizational oversight of rural residential land utilization, reinforcing communication between the government and villagers, and deepening collaboration with local elders to encourage active villager participation in the supervision and management of rural residential land use.
Keywords: rural residential land; government embedment; willingness to engage in mutual supervision; involvement of local elders rural residential land; government embedment; willingness to engage in mutual supervision; involvement of local elders

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, S.; Tang, H.; Yang, Z. Does Government Embedment Enhance Villagers’ Willingness to Mutually Supervise Rural Residential Land Utilization? Land 2025, 14, 2387. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14122387

AMA Style

Chen S, Tang H, Yang Z. Does Government Embedment Enhance Villagers’ Willingness to Mutually Supervise Rural Residential Land Utilization? Land. 2025; 14(12):2387. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14122387

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Sirui, Hong Tang, and Zhongjian Yang. 2025. "Does Government Embedment Enhance Villagers’ Willingness to Mutually Supervise Rural Residential Land Utilization?" Land 14, no. 12: 2387. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14122387

APA Style

Chen, S., Tang, H., & Yang, Z. (2025). Does Government Embedment Enhance Villagers’ Willingness to Mutually Supervise Rural Residential Land Utilization? Land, 14(12), 2387. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14122387

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop