Next Article in Journal
Climate-Informed Water Allocation in Central Asia: Leveraging Decision Support System
Previous Article in Journal
Cross-Water-Body Validation of Chlorophyll-a Retrieval Using Synergistic UAV Hyperspectral and Satellite Multispectral Data in Eutrophic Inland Waters
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrated Numerical Approach to Glyphosate Transport in Soil Profiles Under Farming Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Challenges and Advances in Soil and Groundwater Quality and Resources Assessment

1
Tianjin Center, China Geological Survey, Tianjin 300170, China
2
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Coast Geological Processes and Environmental Safety, Tianjin 300170, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Geomicrobiology and Environmental Changes, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
4
College of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2026, 18(2), 160; https://doi.org/10.3390/w18020160
Submission received: 6 January 2026 / Revised: 7 January 2026 / Accepted: 7 January 2026 / Published: 8 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil and Groundwater Quality and Resources Assessment, 2nd Edition)

1. Introduction

Groundwater and soil systems represent indispensable yet vulnerable components of the Earth’s critical zone, underpinning drinking water supply, agricultural production, ecosystem stability, and sustainable socio-economic development [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. However, these vital resources face unprecedented pressures from the synergistic effects of climate change and intensive anthropogenic activities, including agricultural expansion, industrial discharge, rapid urbanization, and unsustainable resource extraction [6,8,9,10,11]. These compound stressors have significantly altered hydrological cycles and biogeochemical processes, leading to widespread contamination, resource depletion, and ecological degradation [7,8,12,13]. Consequently, the accurate assessment and sustainable management of soil-groundwater systems have emerged as a paramount challenge for both scientific research and environmental governance.
The complexity of pollutant behavior within the interconnected soil-groundwater continuum is a central concern [14,15,16]. Contaminants, encompassing both legacy and emerging inorganic (e.g., heavy metals, nutrients, and geogenic arsenic/fluoride) and organic (e.g., pesticides, industrial solvents, pharmaceuticals, perfluorinated compounds (PFCs), and microplastics) compounds, originate from diverse point and non-point sources [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Their mobilization, speciation, and ultimate fate are governed by a complex interplay of physical transport (advection, dispersion), geochemical reactions (adsorption–desorption, dissolution-precipitation, and redox transformations), and microbiological processes [20,25]. These dynamics are further modulated by site-specific factors such as lithology, hydraulic properties, and the frequency of surface water-groundwater exchange. Climate change intensifies these challenges by altering precipitation patterns and freeze–thaw cycles, which can accelerate contaminant leaching and remobilize stored pollutants. Moreover, elemental biogeochemical cycling has been shown to be critical factors controlling the transformation and fate of materials in these belowground environments [26].
Conventional assessment frameworks exhibit significant limitations in characterizing the spatial heterogeneity of contaminants and quantifying uncertainties in long-term risks under compound stress. This limitation arises primarily from inadequate representation of coupled multi-scale processes and oversimplified descriptions of complex transport-transformation behaviors in heterogeneous media. Therefore, developing an interdisciplinary framework integrating high-resolution in situ monitoring, process-based mechanistic modeling, multi-isotopic tracing (e.g., stable and non-traditional isotopes), and data-driven analytics is imperative [5,6,12,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Synthesizing these complementary approaches enables systematic elucidation of contaminant dynamics in multiphase media, reduces predictive uncertainty, and establishes a scientific foundation for precise environmental risk assessment and sustainable management strategies.
This Special Issue, entitled “Soil and Groundwater Quality and Resources Assessment,” brings together nine research articles that address these challenges through innovative methodologies and case studies across diverse geographical and climatic settings. Collectively, these contributions advance our understanding of contaminant transport mechanisms, groundwater dynamics, hydrogeochemical evolution, and integrated assessment frameworks under varying natural and anthropogenic stressors. This editorial synthesizes key findings from the published studies, highlights methodological innovations, and identifies emerging research directions for the scientific and managerial communities.

2. Modeling Transport Processes and Environmental Geological Effects

Several studies emphasize the power of numerical modeling in disentangling complex subsurface processes. An integrated numerical framework combining the Richards equation and advection–dispersion modeling was developed to simulate glyphosate mobility in agricultural soils (Contribution 1). Through inverse calibration, they revealed that the governing role of soil texture and clay content in contaminant mobility, providing a predictive tool for assessing groundwater vulnerability under long-term agrochemical practices. At the urban and engineering scale, Li et al. (Contribution 2) investigated the mechanical response of buildings to dynamically rising groundwater levels using FLAC3D simulations. Their findings identified phased settlement patterns and tensile stress concentrations at slab-wall junctions, which heighten cracking and seepage risks. The findings underscore the necessity of integrating dynamic groundwater monitoring and differentiated foundation design into structural risk management. Additionally, Zheng et al. (Contribution 3) integrated MIKE URBAN modeling with a genetic algorithm to optimize drainage network layout for annual cost minimization. By linking hydraulic performance with an annual cost system, their approach demonstrates how simulation-based optimization can enhance drainage efficiency while achieving substantial economic savings, providing a practical pathway for climate-resilient agricultural water management.

3. Hydrochemical Processes and Source Identification

Understanding groundwater chemistry evolution under natural and anthropogenic forcing is a recurrent theme across this Special Issue. For example, Ouedraogo et al. (Contribution 4) combined hydrochemistry, stable isotopes (δ18O, δ2H), GIS and multivariate statistics to elucidate surface water–groundwater interactions, the key hydrogeochemical processes and anthropogenic pollution in the Kou basin. Their findings confirm strong hydraulic connectivity between aquifer layers and nitrate contamination from anthropogenic activities, providing a baseline for integrated water resource management in water-scarce regions. In arid endorheic systems, Guo et al. (Contribution 5) integrated inverse hydrochemical modeling with isotopic evidence to quantify mineral dissolution, evaporation concentration, and cation exchange processes along groundwater flow paths in the Qaidam Basin. The work provides a mechanistic understanding of salinity evolution and highlights hydrochemical processes as key drivers of mineral transport and enrichment in arid basins. Zhang et al. (Contribution 6) further advanced the analysis of groundwater dynamics by developing a GIS-based multi-factor weighted comprehensive evaluation system to classify groundwater response types under compound stress. Their results demonstrate how precipitation variability, groundwater extraction, and land use jointly shape spatial heterogeneity in groundwater behavior, offering a framework for differentiated groundwater management strategies.

4. Risk, Eco-Environmental Assessment and Sustainable Management

Several studies address groundwater quality degradation and its implications for human health and ecosystem security. Li Jiani et al. (Contribution 7) proposed an improved DRASTICL model and a kernel density estimation–trapezoidal fuzzy number–Monte Carlo simulation (KDE-TFN-MCSS) model to assess the vulnerability index and health risk in the Songnen Plain, respectively. Furthermore, groundwater quality index (E-GQI) and self-organizing maps (SOM) were employed for water quality assessment and contaminant source apportionment. Applied to a cold-region aquifer system, this method reduces uncertainty in risk estimation and reveals persistent non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks associated with NH4+ and As, particularly under freeze–thaw and urbanization influences. Focusing on industrial regions, Du et al. (Contribution 8) applied spatial autocorrelation analysis and SOM coupled with K-means clustering to investigate the spatial distribution and key influencing factors of nine heavy metals (Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Ba, and Pb) in southern China. Their results highlight the intertwined impacts of industrial pollution, domestic sewage, agricultural activities, and natural mineral dissolution, demonstrating the necessity of integrated source-oriented management in industrialized landscapes. At the watershed scale, Hao et al. (Contribution 9) constructed an ecological–environmental geological quality evaluation system for the Kundulun River Basin, emphasizing the dominant role of land use, precipitation, and groundwater depth in shaping ecological risk patterns. Their zonal management recommendations provide actionable guidance for balancing resource exploitation and ecological protection in arid and semi-arid regions.

5. Synthesis and Future Perspectives

Collectively, the studies in this Special Issue underscore several key insights. First, groundwater systems respond nonlinearly to environmental stresses, with physical, chemical, and anthropogenic processes interacting across scales. Second, integrating numerical models with hydrochemical, isotopic, and data-driven approaches is essential for capturing system complexity and reducing uncertainty. Third, management-oriented frameworks, linking scientific understanding with engineering design and policy needs, are increasingly critical under accelerating climate change and human pressure.
Future research should prioritize (1) coupling groundwater models with climate projections and land-use change scenarios, (2) advancing uncertainty-aware risk assessment tools for vulnerable populations and ecosystems, (3) strengthening cross-scale integration from pore-scale processes to basin-scale management, and (4) integrating the hydro-biogeochemical processes. By doing so, groundwater science can more effectively support sustainable water governance and resilience under compound environmental stress.
The contributions assembled in this Special Issue provide both methodological innovations and practical insights, collectively advancing the frontiers of groundwater and soil-water system research. We hope that this collection will stimulate further interdisciplinary collaboration and inform adaptive management strategies in diverse hydrogeological settings worldwide.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.J. and Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, W.J.; writing—review and editing, Y.S. and H.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Tianjin Natural Science Foundation Project (25JCYBJC00670).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the authors who contributed to this Special Issue. We would also like to thank all the reviewers for providing their valuable comments, which have greatly improved the quality of the published papers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • García-Gallego, J.; Fuentes, S.; Mercado-Fernández, T.; Ventura-Ramos, E.; Treviño-Reséndez, J.; García-Espinoza, J.D.; Fuentes, C.; Chávez, C. Integrated Numerical Approach to Glyphosate Transport in Soil Profiles Under Farming Conditions. Water 2025, 17, 3569.
  • Li, H.; Gu, M.; Zhang, M.; Ma, B.; Zhu, X.; Gu, L.; Tai, J.; Chen, L. Research on the Influence of Groundwater Level Dynamic Rising Process on Buildings Based on Numerical Simulation. Water 2025, 17, 3014.
  • Zheng, Z.; Li, M.; Wang, T.; Ren, H. Study on the Factors Affecting the Drainage Efficiency of New Integrated Irrigation and Drainage Networks and Network Optimization Based on Annual Cost System. Water 2025, 17, 1201.
  • Ouedraogo, I.; Vanclooster, M.; Huneau, F.; Vystavna, Y.; Kebede, S.; Koussoubé, Y. Surface Water–Groundwater Interactions in a Sahelian Catchment: Exploring Hydrochemistry and Isotopes and Implications for Water Quality Management. Water 2025, 17, 2756.
  • Guo, L.; Ding, Y.; Fang, H.; An, C.; Jiang, W.; Yang, N. Integrating Inverse Modeling to Investigate Hydrochemical Evolution in Arid Endorheic Watersheds: A Case Study from the Qaidam Basin, Northwestern China. Water 2025, 17, 2074.
  • Zhang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Jiang, W.; Hao, Y.; Chen, F.; Zhang, M. Characterization of Groundwater Dynamics and Their Response Mechanisms to Different Types of Compound Stress in a Typical Hilly Plain Area. Water 2025, 17, 1846.
  • Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Bian, J.; Sun, X.; Feng, X. Health Risk Assessment of Groundwater in Cold Regions Based on Kernel Density Estimation–Trapezoidal Fuzzy Number–Monte Carlo Simulation Model: A Case Study of the Black Soil Region in Central Songnen Plain. Water 2025, 17, 2984.
  • Du, J.; Liao, F.; Zhang, Z.; Du, A.; Qian, J. Spatial Heterogeneity and Controlling Factors of Heavy Metals in Groundwater in a Typical Industrial Area in Southern China. Water 2025, 17, 2012.
  • Hao, Y.; Wan, J.; Xin, Y.; Zhou, W.; Li, Y.; Mao, L.; Li, X.; Mo, L.; Li, R. Research on Ecological–Environmental Geological Survey and Evaluation Methods for the Kundulun River Basin in Baotou City. Water 2025, 17, 1926.

References

  1. Cuthbert, M.O.; Gleeson, T.; Moosdorf, N.; Befus, K.M.; Schneider, A.; Hartmann, J.; Lehner, B. Global patterns and dynamics of climate-groundwater interactions. Nat. Clim. Change 2019, 9, 137–141. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hou, D.Y.; Jia, X.Y.; Wang, L.W.; McGrath, S.; Zhu, Y.G.; Hu, Q.; Zhao, F.J.; Bank, M.S.; O’Connor, D.; Nriagu, J. Global soil pollution by toxic metals threatens agriculture and human health. Science 2025, 388, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hou, D.; O’Connor, D.; Igalavithana, A.D.; Alessi, D.S.; Luo, J.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Sparks, D.L.; Yamauchi, Y.; Rinklebe, J.; Ok, Y.S. Metal contamination and bioremediation of agricultural soils for food safety and sustainability. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2020, 1, 366–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rohde, M.M.; Albano, C.M.; Huggins, X.; Klausmeyer, K.R.; Morton, C.; Sharman, A.; Zaveri, E.; Saito, L.; Freed, Z.; Howard, J.K.; et al. Groundwater-dependent ecosystem map exposes global dryland protection needs. Nature 2024, 632, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jasechko, S.; Seybold, H.; Perrone, D.; Fan, Y.; Shamsudduha, M.; Taylor, R.G.; Fallatah, O.; Kirchner, J.W. Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally. Nature 2024, 625, 715–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kuang, X.X.; Liu, J.G.; Scanlon, B.R.; Jiao, J.J.; Jasechko, S.; Lancia, M.; Biskaborn, B.K.; Wada, Y.; Li, H.L.; Zeng, Z.Z.; et al. The changing nature of groundwater in the global water cycle. Science 2024, 383, eadf0630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jiang, W.J.; Meng, L.S.; Liu, F.T.; Sheng, Y.Z.; Chen, S.M.; Yang, J.L.; Mao, H.R.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Ning, H. Distribution, source investigation, and risk assessment of topsoil heavy metals in areas with intensive anthropogenic activities using the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model coupled with self-organizing map (SOM). Environ. Geochem. Health 2023, 45, 6353–6370. [Google Scholar]
  8. Niazi, H.; Wild, T.B.; Turner, S.W.D.; Graham, N.T.; Hejazi, M.; Msangi, S.; Kim, S.; Lamontagne, J.R.; Zhao, M.Q. Global peak water limit of future groundwater withdrawals. Nat. Sustain. 2024, 7, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Long, D.; Yang, W.; Scanlon, B.R.; Zhao, J.S.; Liu, D.; Burek, P.; Pan, Y.; You, L.Z.; Wada, Y. South-to-North Water Diversion stabilizing Beijing’s groundwater levels. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abascal, E.; Gómez-Coma, L.; Ortiz, I.; Ortiz, A. Global diagnosis of nitrate pollution in groundwater and review of removal technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 810, 152233. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kurwadkar, S.; Kanel, S.R.; Nakarmi, A. Groundwater pollution, occurrence, detection, and remediation of organic and inorganic pollutants. Water Environ. Res. 2020, 92, 1659–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Scanlon, B.R.; Fakhreddine, S.; Rateb, A.; de Graa, I.; Famiglietti, J.; Gleeson, T.; Grafton, R.Q.; Jobbagy, E.; Kebede, S.; Kolusu, S.R.; et al. Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 87–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sheng, Y.Z.; Jiang, J.W.; Zhang, M. Mobilization, Speciation, and Transformation of Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Soil-Groundwater Ecosystems. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aullón, A.A.; Schulz, C.; Bundschuh, J.; Jacks, G.; Thunvik, R.; Gustafsson, J.P.; Mörth, C.M.; Sraceke, O.; Ahmad, A.; Bhattacharya, P. Hydrogeochemical controls on the mobility of arsenic, fluoride and other geogenic co-contaminants in the shallow aquifers of northeastern LaPampa Province in Argentina. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 715, 136671. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wei, Y.Q.; Chen, Y.L.; Cao, X.D.; Yeh, T.C.J.; Zhang, J.; Zhan, Z.; Cui, Y.D.; Li, H. Modeling of Microplastics Migration in Soil and Groundwater: Insights into Dispersion and Particle Property Effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 15224–15235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Doyi, I.; Essumang, D.; Gbeddy, G.; Dampare, S.; Kumassah, E.; Saka, D. Spatial distribution, accumulation and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil and groundwater of the Tano Basin, Ghana. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 165, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gandhi, T.P.; Sampath, P.V.; Maliyekkal, S.M. A critical review of uranium contamination in groundwater, treatment and sludge disposal. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 825, 153947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, F.; Xiang, L.; Leung, K. Emerging contaminants: A One Health perspective. Innovation 2024, 5, 100612. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Wang, Y.X.; Li, J.X.; Ma, T.; Xie, X.J.; Deng, Y.M.; Gan, Y.Q. Genesis of geogenic contaminated groundwater: As, F and I. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 51, 2895–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Amarasiri, M.; Sano, D.; Suzuki, S. Understanding human health risks caused by antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) in water environments, Current knowledge and questions to be answered. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 50, 2016–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Picetti, R.; Deeney, M.; Pastorino, S.; Miller, M.R.; Shah, A.; Leon, D.A.; Dangour, A.D.; Green, R. Nitrate and nitrite contamination in drinking water and cancer risk, A systematic review with meta-analysis. Environ. Res. 2022, 210, 112988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zainab, S.M.; Junaid, M.; Xu, N.; Malik, R.N. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) in groundwater, A global review on dissemination, sources, interactions, environmental and human health risks. Water Res. 2020, 187, 116455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, Y.; Wang, P.; Gojenko, B.; Yu, J.J.; Wei, L.Z.; Luo, D.G.; Xiao, T.F. A review of water pollution arising from agriculture and mining activities in Central Asia, Facts, causes and effects. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 291, 118209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dong, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Tong, L.; Yu, Y.; Cheng, J.; He, Y.; Shi, J.; Wang, Y. Pathogen contamination of groundwater systems and health risks. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 54, 267–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sheng, Y.; Dong, H.; Coffin, E.; Myrold, D.; Kleber, M. The important role of enzyme adsorbing capacity of soil minerals in regulating β-glucosidase activity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2022, 49, e2021GL097556. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sheng, Y.; Baars, O.; Guo, D.; Whitham, J.; Srivastava, S.; Dong, H. Mineral-bound trace metals as cofactors for anaerobic biological nitrogen fixation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 7206–7216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Xie, J.; Liu, X.; Jasechko, S.; Berghuijs, W.; Wang, K.; Liu, C.; Reichstein, M.; Jung, M.; Koirala, S. Majority of global river flow sustained by groundwater. Nat. Geosci. 2024, 17, 770–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiang, W.J.; Wang, G.C.; Sheng, Y.Z.; Shi, X.M.; Zhang, H. Isotopes in groundwater (2H, 18O, 14C) revealed the climate and groundwater re-charge in the Northern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 666, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jiang, W.J.; Sheng, Y.Z.; Wang, G.C.; Shi, Z.M.; Liu, F.T.; Zhang, J.; Chen, D.L. Cl, Br, B, Li, and noble gases isotopes to study the origin and evolution of deep groundwater in sedimentary basins, a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 1497–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cao, W.G.; Zhang, Z.; Fu, Y.; Zhao, L.H.; Ren, Y.; Nan, T.; Guo, H.M. Prediction of arsenic and fluoride in groundwater of the North China Plain using enhanced stacking ensemble learning. Water Res. 2024, 259, 121848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rateb, A.; Scanlon, B.R.; Pool, D.R.; Sun, A.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Chen, J.L.; Clark, B.; Faunt, C.C.; Haugh, C.J.; Hill, M.; et al. Comparison of Groundwater Storage Changes From GRACE Satellites With Monitoring and Modeling of Major U.S. Aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 2020, 56, e2020WR027556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, J.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, C.; Gong, H.; Xu, L.; Huang, Z.; Lu, S. Comparison of groundwater storage changes over losing and gaining aquifers of China using GRACE satellites, modeling and in-situ observations. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 938, 173514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mukherjee, A.; Coomar, P.; Sarkar, S.; Johannesson, K.H.; Fryar, A.E.; Schreiber, M.E.; Ahmed, K.M.; Alam, M.A.; Bhattacharya, P.; Bundschuh, J.; et al. Arsenic and other geogenic contaminants in global groundwater. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2024, 5, 312–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Podgorski, J.; Berg, M. Global analysis and prediction of fluoride in groundwater. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, R.N.; Li, Z.C.; Xie, X.J.; Hou, Q.X.; Han, D.Y.; Yuan, Z.T.; Huang, G.X. A multi-method for identifying and spatial modeling of groundwater nitrate natural background levels in an urbanized delta in China: Insight from Cl/Br ratios combining with KNN algorithm and EBK. Water Res. 2026, 289, 124953. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, W.; Sheng, Y.; Mao, H. Challenges and Advances in Soil and Groundwater Quality and Resources Assessment. Water 2026, 18, 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18020160

AMA Style

Jiang W, Sheng Y, Mao H. Challenges and Advances in Soil and Groundwater Quality and Resources Assessment. Water. 2026; 18(2):160. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18020160

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Wanjun, Yizhi Sheng, and Hairu Mao. 2026. "Challenges and Advances in Soil and Groundwater Quality and Resources Assessment" Water 18, no. 2: 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18020160

APA Style

Jiang, W., Sheng, Y., & Mao, H. (2026). Challenges and Advances in Soil and Groundwater Quality and Resources Assessment. Water, 18(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18020160

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop