Next Article in Journal
Resilience of Organic Matter Recovery to Seasonal Temperature Changes in a Wastewater Treatment System Adopting the High-Rate Contact Stabilization Process
Previous Article in Journal
Biomass-Derived Hydrochar Functionalized with Mg–Fe Layered Double Hydroxide for Bicomponent Cd(II)/Zn(II) Adsorption in Aqueous Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Three Types of Natural Radioactivity in Groundwaters

by
Tadeusz Andrzej Przylibski
and
Dominika Ciapka
*
Department of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże S. Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2026, 18(14), 1659; https://doi.org/10.3390/w18141659
Submission received: 28 May 2026 / Revised: 2 July 2026 / Accepted: 4 July 2026 / Published: 8 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrogeology)

Abstract

The authors collected data on concentrations of natural radionuclides (222Rn, 226Ra, 228Ra, 238U, 234U, 40K, 210Pb, 210Po, 3H, and 14C) in medicinal waters in Poland. Medicinal waters were chosen because they represent an almost complete spectrum of hydrochemical types and groundwater mineralization. The ranges of these concentrations are presented as divided into three regions: the Sudetes, the Carpathians and the Polish Lowlands. Medicinal waters of the Sudetes are characterized by the highest concentrations of 222Rn, 238U and 234U. The radioactivity of Carpathian medicinal waters is associated with the presence of 226,228Ra and 40K and, more rarely, 238,234U or 222Rn. Medicinal waters of the Polish Lowlands are characterized by increased concentrations of 226,228Ra and 40K, while 222Rn and the isotopes 238,234U occur in them in very low concentrations. In terms of natural radionuclide content three types of groundwaters can be defined. Medicinal waters of the Sudetes can be characterized as radium–uranium–radon waters (Rn > U > Ra; where 234U > 238U and 226Ra > 228Ra), of the Carpathians as radium–potassium waters (K > Ra; where 226Ra > 228Ra), and of the Polish Lowlands as potassium–radium waters (Ra > K; where 228Ra > 226Ra).

1. Introduction

Human health and proper functioning are related to using water. Water is essential to life, and it can be used to improve its quality by keeping a person in good psychophysical condition and by restoring health. To achieve this aim, the properties of both water and substances dissolved in it are used. Treatment through contact with water is generally a very safe form of therapy, with a low risk of complications and a short list of contraindications to usage. Hydrotherapy is also used in relaxation treatments, aesthetic medicine and spa treatments helping to maintain youthful appearance. Modern hydrotherapy started to spread in Europe in the early 19th century thanks to people like Vincenz Prisnitz (Vincenz Prißnitz or Vincent Priessnitz). Prisnitz was an illiterate self-taught healer, who popularized treatments using cold spring water (baths and showers) as a form of spa treatment (balneotherapy) in the spa resort Gräfenberg in the Austrian part of Silesia [1], now Lázně Jeseník, a part of the town Jeseník in the northwestern part of the Czech Republic, not far from the Polish border.
In many countries worldwide, medicinal waters are understood as groundwaters containing specific ingredients giving them therapeutic properties, and they include thermal waters and brines. Medicinal waters are used in a range treatments: individual baths in bathtubs, bubble baths, baths in pools, baths in natural springs and pools, showers, inhalations or massages (whirlpool, underwater and hydromassage), Scotch hoses, and, very often, drinking treatments. Their usage is often connected with centuries-old tradition, dating back hundreds or even thousands of years. For centuries, in areas with the occurrence of such waters, health resorts, sanatoriums, and leisure and tourist facilities have been set up. Medicinal waters are used in both naturopathy and modern therapeutic (balneotherapeutic) treatments employing contemporary achievements of spa medicine, physical medicine and physical therapy. Such treatments are particularly popular in Europe (e.g., in Germany, Austria, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Poland, Lithuania and Russia) and in Asia (China and Japan) [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. An overview of occurrences of medicinal waters, brines, and thermal waters regarded as medicinal, as well as the ways of their commercial usage in Poland, was presented by Filippovits et al. [12]. As of 31 December 2024, there were 116 deposits of such waters in Poland, most of which were being exploited. The overview does not comprise several exploited deposits of thermal waters which are not classified as medicinal. However, some of them have been included in the current study because of the existing isotopic data. Within one deposit or one locality, water is usually abstracted from one intake (usually a dug or drilled well), several intakes, or, exceptionally, from about a dozen intakes. Among the 116 catalogued Polish deposits of medicinal waters and brines, 5 deposits lie in the area of the East European (Precambrian) Platform, 25 in the West European (Palaeozoic) Platform, 20 deposits in the area of the Sudetes, and 66 in the Carpathians [12]. Due to the small number of available isotopic data, the authors combined all the occurrences (deposits) of medicinal waters on the East European and the West European platforms into one group: deposits in the Polish Lowlands. According to the adopted division, medicinal and potentially medicinal waters of the Sudetes occur in a wide variety of Palaeozoic crystalline rocks of the Variscan orogen and in Carboniferous and Cretaceous sedimentary rocks. In the Carpathians, they are associated with Mesozoic and Early Cenozoic sedimentary rocks of the Alpine orogeny fold structures and, exceptionally, with crystalline rocks. In the Polish Lowlands, medicinal and potentially medicinal waters are found in Mesozoic and Cenozoic platform sediments.
In Poland, groundwaters can be classified as medicinal if they are chemically or microbiologically uncontaminated, characterized by natural variability of physical and chemical properties, and contain no less than 1000 mg/dm3 of dissolved solid minerals or 250 mg/dm3 of free CO2, 10 mg/dm3 of Fe2+, 2 mg/dm3 of F, 1 mg/dm3 of I, 70 mg/dm3 of metasilicic acid, or 74 Bq/dm3 of radon (isotope 222Rn) [13]. Additionally, if they are to be used in balneotherapeutic or physicotherapeutic treatments, they need to have an official certificate confirming the stability of their physicochemical properties, based on the results of at least two years of analyses [14].
The primary goal of the authors’ work is to present the current state of knowledge on the occurrence of natural radioactive isotopes in waters recognized as medicinal in Poland. Due to the wide (almost complete) spectrum of hydrochemical types and mineralization of medicinal waters, we will obtain an overview of the content of natural radioactive isotopes in groundwater from a typical area with a platform structure (Polish Lowlands; platform structure—East European (Precambrian) Platform and the West European (Palaeozoic) Platform), an area of young Alpine fold belts (Carpathians) and the Variscan orogen (Sudetes; part of the Bohemian massif). These units represent the major geological units of Central Europe. This study represents the first compilation-based analysis addressing the occurrence of natural radioactive isotopes in groundwater at such a broad regional scale in this part of Europe.
Based on this, the authors aim to identify characteristic groundwater types in terms of their natural radioactive isotope content and their relationships to areas with characteristic geological structures. This is the main goal of the study. Another goal is to present the gathered information on the role of particular radioactive isotopes in giving groundwaters their medicinal properties or in restricting their usage in balneotherapy and physical therapy in view of their potentially harmful effect on the human body.

1.1. Natural Radioactive Isotopes in Groundwaters

Radioactive constituents found in groundwaters, including medicinal waters, are some of the most important elements contributing to the physical properties of these waters. On the one hand, they can give groundwaters medicinal properties (e.g., radon—the isotope 222Rn) (e.g., [15]) but, on the other, they are undesirable constituents, limiting the possibilities of putting medicinal waters to use. At the same time, radioactive isotopes (e.g., tritium or uranium isotopes) convey information on the genesis, origin, age, and the flow paths and modes of medicinal groundwaters or their components in reservoir rocks (within the rock mass) (e.g., [16,17,18,19,20]).
Radioactive isotopes can occur in the groundwater environment (also in medicinal waters) in ionic form, as constituents of suspensions and colloids, or as dissolved gases. The most significant natural radioactive isotopes dissolved in medicinal waters are those which have the strongest impact on the human body. Such an impact is characteristic of the isotopes which cause the greatest energy transfer to human cells during the shortest possible time. Therefore, these are especially the isotopes whose activity concentrations in groundwaters are the highest and/or those characterized by short half-life (and, consequently, the highest specific activity). Among these isotopes, the most important radioactive constituents of medicinal waters are isotopes of radium and radon. The biggest role is played by two radium isotopes, 226Ra and 228Ra, and the radon isotope with the longest half-life, i.e., 222Rn. In some waters, the uranium isotopes 238U and 234U may also be important. In some medicinal waters, an important role may also be played by radioactive isotopes of light elements, i.e., 40K, 14C and 3H (T; tritium). It is also possible that radioactive isotopes of heavy metals, being the end links of natural decay chains, especially 210Pb and 210Po from the uranium–radium series, may also be very significant in some medicinal waters [21]. However, it must be emphasized that the adverse impact of uranium isotopes on the human body is usually due to the chemical properties of uranium (a heavy metal) rather than to the emitted ionizing radiation [22,23].
The source of 238U and 40K isotopes in medicinal groundwaters are their reservoir rocks or, more precisely, the minerals building these rocks. The sources of 234U, 226Ra and 228Ra, 222Rn, 210Po and 210Pb can be both reservoir rock minerals and chemical compounds containing the heaviest isotopes from natural decay chains, i.e., uranium, thorium and radium isotopes, secondarily precipitated from groundwaters in cracks and fissures of reservoir rocks. Finally, the lighter uranium isotope, radium isotopes, and, in particular, 222Rn, can be formed in groundwater itself as a result of radioactive decay of uranyl ions ([UO2]2+) and simple radium (226Ra2+ and 228Ra2+) and thorium (Th4+) ions. Also, 222Rn in the form of monatomic gas dissolved in medicinal groundwater may be the source of 210Po and 210Pb isotopes. Tritium (3H) and 14C are produced as a result of nuclear reactions in the atmosphere, from where they infiltrate with precipitation and enter medicinal groundwaters. The isotope 14C can also be released, as a result of dissolution processes, from young (no more than several dozen thousand years old) reservoir rocks containing carbonate minerals and/or organic matter [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32].
The radionuclide 222Rn very rarely occurs in groundwaters in a state of radioactive equilibrium with its parent radium isotope, 226Ra [26,33,34]. It is due to the fact that 222Rn dissolves in groundwater as a gas released from the reservoir rocks in which it is formed as a result of 226Ra decay. Rarely, its source in groundwater, also medicinal, is the simple 226Ra2+ ion dissolved in this water. Such a situation usually occurs in waters with very high TDS content and high concentration of dissolved radium, especially in brines. The highest values of 222Rn activity concentration are recorded in low-TDS waters of shallow circulation and modern infiltration [26,33].
As for radium isotopes, they dissolve in groundwater especially when they are close to the surface of grains or crystals of minerals building reservoir rocks. These are often secondary minerals or chemical compounds containing radium, precipitated on the surface of fissures or cracks filled with groundwaters. The highest values of radium isotopes’ activity concentration are recorded in high-TDS waters with increased temperature, i.e., in thermal waters and especially in brines [26,33,34,35]. The world’s highest known activity concentration of 226Ra (85.5 Bq/dm3) has been recorded in medicinal brines of Ustroń in Poland [34,36]. It is probably due to their occurrence in the vicinity of rocks of organic origin, i.e., hard coal deposits. Unpublished data suggest that comparable or even higher activity concentrations of radium isotopes could be expected in brines accompanying oil deposits [37].
It should also be noted that all radioactive isotopes found in medicinal waters can act as environmental tracers. This means that, by analyzing their contents and their changes, as well as the ratios of the concentrations of their constituents, one can obtain information essential for determining their genesis, age, flow paths and the proportion of components mixing to form the exploited medicinal waters. Particularly useful in such research are the isotopes 3H and 14C, as well as isotopes of uranium, radium and radon [18,19,20,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. The use of these isotopes in tracer studies has been well known for many years [16]. What is still open, however, also in Poland, are issues connected with medicinal properties or the groundwaters whose radioactivity is determined by their radon (222Rn) content [15,47], as well as the adverse health effect of medicinal waters containing high concentrations of 226Ra and 228Ra [48,49]. These two issues are significant problems that require scientific, technological and legal solutions. The common lack of radioactive equilibrium between isotopes from natural decay chains found in groundwaters is the reason why it is vital to get to know the activity concentrations of the radioactive isotopes being the last links in natural decay chains, especially lead and polonium isotopes (particularly 210Pb and 210Po), in medicinal waters.

1.2. Harmful and Potentially Beneficial Effects of Radioactive Isotopes on the Human Body

The isotopes 226Ra, 228Ra and 222Rn are recognized as carcinogenic agents by international organizations [30,48,50]. Therefore, Polish law [51] and international recommendations [22,30,52,53,54] define the levels of allowable activity concentrations of these isotopes in water intended for human consumption and in workplaces (Table 1). Also, measuring their activity concentration in medicinal waters is required [55,56]. Due to the high specific activity of radium, especially of the isotope 228Ra, it should be recognized as a totally undesirable constituent of medicinal waters. Its concentration has to be monitored, and doses received by patients and medical and technical staff involved in administering treatments have to be measured or calculated. Nevertheless, the measures taken in this regard in Poland are rudimentary [57,58] and highly insufficient, not only with regard to European recommendations [54] but also domestic radiological protection regulations [59].
The problem of the effect of ionizing radiation looks slightly different for the radionuclide 222Rn. Based on the theory of radiation hormesis, radon is used as a therapeutic agent in several Polish and many European and non-European health resorts, and it is regarded as a component giving groundwaters medicinal properties [15] and references therein; [26] and references therein. For this reason, medicinal radon waters, as well as radon-enriched air inside underground workings and caves, are used in many radon health resorts worldwide for therapeutic purposes [15]. In view of these facts, it is absolutely necessary, especially in Polish spa resorts, to implement monitoring of 222Rn activity concentration and its radioactive daughters and to control doses from ionizing radiation emitted by these isotopes. This applies to medicinal materials, i.e., medicinal groundwaters, the air in caves and workings, and hitherto unused though widely available soil air enriched in 222Rn, to spaces intended for therapeutic treatments, and also to medical and technical staff as well as spa clients and patients. It is also possible to employ automatic solutions for monitoring and maintaining highly specified conditions such as the activity concentration of 222Rn and its decay products and the effective dose of ionizing radiation during all possible radon therapy treatments [15]. So far, however, none of the Polish health resorts has fully exploited such possibilities.
Using 222Rn in therapeutic treatments based on the use of medicinal radon waters and identifying the adverse effect of radium isotopes dissolved in medicinal waters are both possible thanks to taking into account the mechanism of transfer of the ionizing radiation energy emitted by these isotopes and absorbed by a patient’s cells and tissues. This problem also applies to employees administering therapeutic treatments using radon waters or other radon materials or waters containing increased concentrations of 226Ra and/or 228Ra. Therefore, it is necessary to convert the measured activity concentration of 222Rn, 226Ra and 228Ra to the effective dose of ionizing radiation. Another important issue is the behavior of the very element in the human body. Radon is mostly excreted during breathing and with urine [48]. Radium, on the other hand, can be absorbed into the body, where it can substitute calcium ions (Ca2+) with a similar ionic radius. This results in Ra2+ ions being incorporated into bone tissue and significantly modifying its physical properties. The radium isotopes incorporated in tissues are practically unremovable from the body and are an internal source of ionizing radiation for the rest of one’s life. They are also the beginning of a chain of successive radioactive transformations causing the formation in the human body of further sources of ionizing radiation—the nuclei of Po, Bi, Tl and Pb isotopes [23,60]. Also, 222Rn, which enters the human body mainly through the respiratory system, besides emitting alpha and gamma radiation during its radioactive decay, causes the formation of further radioactive isotopes of Po, Bi, Tl and Pb, which are solids. They can subsequently dissolve in body fluids, including blood, and undergo radioactive transformations in various organs and tissues, causing principal exposure to ionizing radiation related to the presence of radon [7,8,61,62]. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to standardize radon treatments in a way that will make it possible to estimate as accurately as possible the dose received from 222Rn and especially from its daughters by spa clients, patients and staff during various balneotherapeutic and physical therapy treatments using radon materials: radon waters and radon-enriched air [63].
As the concentration of potassium, hence also the isotope 40K, is constant in a healthy human body (c. 4000 mmol.; 102 g (women)–134 g (men), which corresponds to 40K content of 3200–4200 Bq, respectively) [64,65] and as the ratio 40K/K is constant in the environment (0.0117%) [24,27], the isotope 40K is not taken into account when discussing the beneficial or adverse effects of radioisotopes on the human body. Uranium isotopes, due to their low content in medicinal waters (likewise in most groundwaters) and low specific radioactive activity, can only be toxic owing to their chemical properties, and not because of the emitted ionizing radiation [48]. Also, the activity concentrations of the isotopes 14C and 3H in medicinal waters are too low for the ionizing radiation emitted by these isotopes to have significant effect on the human body [66] (Table 1). As for the isotopes 210Pb and 210Po, our knowledge of their occurrence in medicinal waters is still too limited to say if the ionizing radiation emitted by them has significant effect on the bodies of patients or members of the medical or technical staff employed in health resorts.
For comparison purposes, it is worth citing the parametric values or derived concentrations, i.e., the concentrations for which the calculated effective dose is 0.1 mSv/year, applicable in Poland to water intended for human consumption. These values must not be exceeded in medicinal waters either, especially if they are used in drinking treatment. However, it should be remembered that these levels were calculated for the assumed water intake of 730 L a year. The amount of water drunk by patients is far smaller and, therefore, the parametric values (derived concentrations) for such water should be appropriately larger, and the effective dose for a specific intake ought to be calculated. Nevertheless, the values shown in the table clearly indicate that it is crucial to obtain information on concentrations of potentially most hazardous natural radioactive isotopes, i.e., isotopes of radium, lead and polonium: 226Ra, 228Ra, 210Pb, and 210Po.

2. Materials and Methods

This study is based on a compilation and analysis of published data concerning the occurrence of natural radioactive isotopes in groundwater within three major European geological units: the Sudetes (representing the north-eastern part of the Bohemian Massif), the northern part of the Carpathian arc, and the Polish Lowlands, which include the Paleozoic West European Platform and the Precambrian East European Platform.
The dataset was derived from peer-reviewed scientific publications and includes reported concentration ranges of individual natural radioactive isotopes in groundwater exploited from recognized medicinal water deposits. In addition, the dataset was supplemented with unpublished data obtained from laboratory analyses conducted under the supervision of the first author, as well as archival data derived from hydrogeological documentation of medicinal water deposits. These data correspond to doctoral research conducted under the supervision of the first author and to hydrogeological documentation of four medicinal water deposits. The additional sources were included primarily to complement data on radon and radium isotopes, enabling a more comprehensive representation of their occurrence. Their inclusion made it possible to obtain information for 68 out of 116 medicinal water deposits in Poland. The unpublished data constitute only a minor portion of the overall dataset. Moreover, a substantial portion of the unpublished data has previously been utilized in scientific publications, allowing independent verification and contextualization of the information presented in this review.
To ensure consistency and comparability, all collected data were standardized, including the harmonization of units reported across different studies (e.g., conversion of tritium units to becquerels).
Although the analyzed data originate from the territory of Poland, they are representative of geological formations characteristic of broader European geological units. Medicinal groundwater was selected as the primary data source due to the wide availability of published isotopic data for this category of water. Furthermore, medicinal waters cover nearly the full spectrum of hydrochemical groundwater types occurring within the analyzed geological settings, which makes them suitable for a comprehensive regional assessment.
The compiled dataset spans several decades and includes results obtained using different analytical methods. Despite the temporal and methodological variability, all available data were included in order to achieve a comprehensive assessment of radionuclide occurrence across a geologically diverse and extensive study area. The acquisition of a comparable dataset through original measurements would require long-term monitoring and the involvement of multiple analytical laboratories.
The processed dataset was subsequently analyzed comparatively across the investigated geological units. The results were presented in both tabular and graphical forms. Based on this analysis, groundwater types were identified and characterized in terms of their natural radioactive isotope content, and relationships between radionuclide occurrence and geological settings were established.

3. Results

3.1. The Occurrence of Natural Radioactive Isotopes in Groundwaters Recognized as Medicinal in Poland

The geological structure of Poland is varied, which is the result of its location at the junction of several big European geological units: the East European Precambrian Platform, the West European Palaeozoic Platform and the areas of the Variscan (the Sudetes) and Alpine (the Carpathians) folding [67]. In accordance with this geological division, Paczyński and Płochniewski [4] distinguished four provinces of mineral water occurrence in Poland (Figure 1): the Precambrian platform (A), the Palaeozoic platform (B), the Sudetes (C), and the Carpathians (D). This division is also used in the classification of medicinal and thermal waters. In view of the small number of deposits, and particularly the amount of data on the concentration of natural radioactive isotopes in groundwaters in the area of the Precambrian (East-European) Platform, the authors analyzed medicinal waters, thermal waters and brines on both platforms jointly, combining them into one area of the Polish Lowlands. In the area of the Sudetes, the following types of medicinal and potentially medicinal waters occur: radon waters (Świeradów-Zdrój, Kowary, Sosnówka, Szklarska Poręba, Jeleniów, Przerzeczyn-Zdrój, and Sobótka), thermal radon waters (Lądek-Zdrój, Karpniki, and Staniszów), thermal waters (Cieplice Śląskie-Zdrój), CO2-rich waters (Czerniawa-Zdrój, Świeradów-Zdrój, Szczawno-Zdrój, Jedlina-Zdrój, Kudowa-Zdrój, Polanica-Zdrój, Duszniki-Zdrój, and Gorzanów), CO2-rich radon waters (Świeradów-Zdrój, Szczawno-Zdrój, Bobrowniki Stare, Długopole-Zdrój, Szczawina, and Jeleniów), and sulphide waters (Przerzeczyn-Zdrój). In the Carpathians, CO2-rich waters prevail (Krynica-Zdrój, Muszyna-Zdrój, Piwniczna-Zdrój, Łomnica-Zdrój, Iwonicz-Zdrój, Rymanów-Zdrój, Lubatówka, Szczawa, Szczawnica, Szczawnik, Tylicz, Wysowa-Zdrój, and Żegiestów), followed by brines (Ustroń, Dębowiec, Zabłocie, Rabka-Zdrój, Rymanów-Zdrój, Lubatówka, and Wełnin), thermal waters (Bańska Niżna, Białka Tatrzańska, Bukowina, Chochołów, Poronin, and Zakopane), sulfide waters (Busko-Zdrój, Solec-Zdrój, Las Winiarski, Dobrowoda, Latoszyn, Mateczny, Swoszowice, and Horyniec-Zdrój) and iodide waters (Polańczyk). In the area of the Polish Lowlands, there are mainly brines (Połczyn-Zdrój, Sopot, Świnoujście, Kołobrzeg, Kamień Pomorski, and Konstancin-Jeziorna) and thermal brines (Ciechocinek and Grudziądz), as well as thermal waters (Uniejów, Poddębice, and Mszczonów), sulfide waters (Inowrocław and Wieniec) and ferruginous waters (Nałęczów).
Studies on the occurrence of natural radioactive isotopes in groundwaters have been carried out all over Poland. They have covered all of the most important natural radionuclides (222Rn, 226,228Ra, 238,234U, 40K, 210Pb, 210Po, 3H, and 14C). The largest number of analyses were conducted in medicinal waters because of the need to assess their safety for patients and to monitor the level of natural radioactivity of waters. The results of such research have made it possible to determine the age of waters, their origin, and geochemical processes occurring in reservoir rocks in particular geological units [16,17,18,20,36,40,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78].
Figure 1. Location of medicinal waters on a simplified tectonic map of Poland without Cenozoic deposits (according to [79,80,81]; slightly modified by the authors); medicinal and thermal waters and brines are marked as red rhombuses in Polish Lowlands, as blue rhombuses in the Sudetes and as green rhombuses in the Carpathians; numbers describe localization—see descriptions on the figure.
Figure 1. Location of medicinal waters on a simplified tectonic map of Poland without Cenozoic deposits (according to [79,80,81]; slightly modified by the authors); medicinal and thermal waters and brines are marked as red rhombuses in Polish Lowlands, as blue rhombuses in the Sudetes and as green rhombuses in the Carpathians; numbers describe localization—see descriptions on the figure.
Water 18 01659 g001
The largest amount of data on the concentration of natural radioactive isotopes in medicinal groundwaters come from the Carpathian (D) and the Sudetic (C) provinces. Province C comprises the Polish Sudetes and the Fore-Sudetic Block (Figure 2). In the Polish part of the Sudetes and in the Fore-Sudetic Block, three main types of medicinal waters are distinguished: the commonest CO2-rich waters, thermal waters and radon waters [82]. A lot of data come from province C, especially on isotopes from the uranium–radium series (238U–206Pb). This is related to the occurrence of uranium- and radium-rich crystalline rocks in this area [68,83,84,85,86,87,88]. This was the basis of research into concentrations of natural radionuclides, especially 222Rn, 226,228Ra and 238,234U in groundwaters in this area, particularly in medicinal waters used in health resorts and in potentially medicinal waters [26,89]. It is also important that waters with high 222Rn content are treated as medicinal waters [13]. The large number of determinations, especially of the isotope 222Rn (also in radon medicinal waters and potentially medicinal waters), has made it possible to determine the hydrogeochemical background of 222Rn in groundwaters of the Sudetes, the Fore-Sudetic Block, and minor geological units included in them [26,90,91,92].

3.2. The Sudetes

An analysis of literature data shows varied concentrations of natural radionuclides (222Rn, 226,228Ra, and 238,234U) in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters in the area of the Sudetes. This is related to the mosaic-like geological structure of the Sudetes, with the presence in neighboring areas of uranium-rich igneous rocks (granites), metamorphic rocks with increased concentrations of this element (orthogneisses), but also igneous and metamorphic rocks with low uranium and radium content (respectively, basalts and paragneisses, mica schists, serpentinites, phyllites, greenstones, quartzites, marbles and others). In other units, there are also sedimentary rocks, including clastic rocks with low uranium and radium content [93,94,95,96]. Determination results of these radioactive isotopes’ concentrations have been compiled in Table 2.
The value of the hydrogeochemical background was determined only for the isotope 222Rn, as it was the only radionuclide for which a sufficient amount of data was available. The hydrogeochemical background of 222Rn for groundwaters of the Sudetes is 4–306 Bq/dm3 and the range of the measured values 0.1–3368 Bq/dm3 (Table 2). Among the geological units of the Sudetes, the highest values of the hydrogeochemical background of 222Rn in groundwaters have been determined for the Lądek-Śnieżnik metamorphic complex (36–1250 Bq/dm3), the Izera metamorphic complex (17–890 Bq/dm3) and the Karkonosze granite (16–690 Bq/dm3) [98,111]. The highest values of 222Rn activity concentration were measured in towns situated in the area of the Izera metamorphic complex (Szklarska Poręba, measured value range: 19.5–3368 Bq/dm3, Świeradów-Zdrój, <0.2–2005 Bq/dm3) and the Lądek-Śnieżnik metamorphic complex (Lądek-Zdrój, 110–1413 Bq/dm3), hence in the areas of orthogneiss occurrence in the geological units with the highest hydrogeochemical background of 222Rn [98]. Slightly lower values were recorded in the area of the Karkonosze granite occurrence (Szklarska Poręba, 931–1282 Bq/dm3, and Kowary, 374–650 Bq/dm3). Within the fore-Sudetic block, the highest values of 222Rn activity concentration were measured in the health resort Przerzeczyn-Zdrój (13–176 Bq/dm3) and in Sobótka (1.0–335 Bq/dm3), where only potentially medicinal radon waters occur.
The highest values of 226Ra activity concentration have been measured in the areas of the Izera metamorphic complex (Świeradów-Zdrój, 16–1360 mBq/dm3, and Szklarska Poręba, 11–1250 mBq/dm3) and the intra-Sudetic basin (Duszniki-Zdrój, 32–1260 mBq/dm3, and Polanica-Zdrój, 121–1200 mBq/dm3). The highest concentrations of 228Ra (up to 840 mBq/dm3) were measured in the same localities, which suggests a correlation between the presence of both radium isotopes in the same geological units. As both of these radium isotopes belong to different radioactive series (226Ra to the uranium–radium series and 228Ra to the thorium series), this also indicates that the concentrations of both radium isotopes in Sudetic groundwaters are determined by the chemical properties of this element and not by the processes related to radioactive transformations.
Although uranium concentrations (234,238U) have been reported less frequently, groundwaters richest in this element are found in the area of the intra-Sudetic basin filled with sedimentary rocks. The highest activity concentrations of uranium isotopes have been recorded in Szczawno-Zdrój (4–725 mBq/dm3 for 238U and 12.1–964 mBq/dm3 for 234U), in Duszniki-Zdrój (1.1–81 and 2.5–239 mBq/dm3), and Jedlina-Zdrój (1.0–54 and 2.4–366 mBq/dm3, respectively). It should be emphasized that the concentration ranges of uranium isotopes (238U and 234U) in the area of the Sudetes and the fore-Sudetic block are largely unknown due to the limited amount of available data.
In the case of the other analyzed isotopes in the area of Province C, shown in Table 3 (210Pb, 210Po, 40K, 3H, and 14C), the available amount of data is insufficient to conduct a fuller geochemical analysis and assess mutual correlations between the concentrations of these isotopes. The 210Pb isotope content has been measured within just a few geological units. The highest values of lead isotope activity concentration were recorded in the areas of the Bystrzyca and Orlica Mountains metamorphic complex (Szczawina, 485–609 mBq/dm3) and the intra-Sudetic basin (Duszniki-Zdrój, 547 mBq/dm3). No available literature data on the concentration range of 210Po in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters in the area of the Sudetes were found. The highest concentrations of the isotope 40K were found in the area of the intra-Sudetic basin (Szczawno-Zdrój, 330–740 mBq/dm3, and Jedlina-Zdrój, 250 mBq/dm3). Isolated results were also obtained from several places, including the health resorts in Lądek-Zdrój and Cieplice Śląskie-Zdrój, though the activity concentrations of the isotope 40K measured in both localities do not exceed 26 mBq/dm3.
Zero and trace concentrations of tritium have been measured in the area of the Karkonosze granite (Karpniki and Staniszów, 0.0 TU; Cieplice Śląskie-Zdrój, 0.0–1.7 TU) and the Lądek-Śnieżnik metamorphic complex (Lądek-Zdrój, 0.0–1.0 TU). The results of tritium determination, often over 20 TU, have been obtained in the area of the intra-Sudetic basin (Duszniki-Zdrój, 2.2–35.1 TU; Kudowa Zdrój 0.0–28.8 TU; Polanica-Zdrój, 0.0–23.4 TU), which explicitly indicates the contribution of the modern component (i.e., post-1952) towards recharging these medicinal waters [41,69].
The data presented in Table 2 and Table 3 indicate that, for the Sudetes region, a relatively extensive dataset is available for isotopes 222Rn, 226Ra, and 228Ra, while data for 234U and 238U are more limited. For other isotopes, such as 40K and 3H, there is a clear lack of data, whereas, for 210Po, 210Pb, and 14C, the available information is limited and incomplete.

3.3. The Carpathians

Province D is divided into three main regions (Figure 3): the Carpathian Foredeep, the Outer Carpathians and the Inner Carpathians. Particular regions differ in geological setup, both in terms of tectonics and lithology. Geologically, the Carpathians are divided into the Inner Carpathians (the Tatras, the Podhale Basin, and the Pieniny klippen belt) and the Outer Carpathians aka the Flysch Carpathians [67,115]. In this province, occurrences of CO2-rich waters and brines are notably frequent. A characteristic feature of this area is cooccurrence of mineral and ordinary waters [116]. In province D, like in provinces A and B, there are no medicinal radon waters, and potentially medicinal radon waters are very rare (cf. Table 2 and Table 4). The occurrence of medicinal waters in the area of province D (the Carpathians plus the Carpathian Foredeep) is shown in Figure 3.
The value of the hydrogeochemical background was determined only for the isotope 222Rn and only in the area of the Variscan granitoids of the Tatra Mountains building the inner part of the Alpine orogen of the Carpathians [103,120]. The hydrogeochemical background of 222Rn in the area of the Tatra granitoids is 0.7–61 Bq/dm3, and the measured value range is <0.2–104.2 Bq/dm3. The results of analyses conducted in the area of the Carpathians and the Carpathian Foredeep show that 222Rn concentration in spring waters and groundwaters usually ranges from several to several dozen Bq/dm3 and rarely exceeds 80 Bq/dm3 (Table 4). Such a relationship may be due to a lack of contact between groundwaters and rock formations rich in uranium and radium (226Ra). In the case of the Tatra granitoids, the relatively low values of 222Rn activity concentration may additionally depend on the degree of erosion of the granitoid massif exposed on the land surface [101].
The highest values of 226Ra activity concentration have been detected in the Outer Carpathians (Ustroń, <3–85 500 mBq/dm3, Lubatówka, 1300–1396 mBq/dm3, and Dębowiec, 190–1270 mBq/dm3). The extreme values measured in the Inner Carpathians are slightly lower (Chochołów, 2260 mBq/dm3). The activity concentration of 226Ra in Ustroń, reaching 85,500 mBq/dm3, is associated with brines that have been in contact with Carboniferous organic sediments (hard coal formations). According to the available literature, this represents the highest value of 226Ra activity concentration in groundwater reported worldwide to date [34]. The highest values of 228Ra activity concentration were also recorded in the Outer Carpathians, in Dębowiec (110–1320 mBq/dm3) and Lubatówka (1100–1271 mBq/dm3). So far, the maximum activity concentrations of 226Ra and 228Ra in mineral waters of the Outer Carpathians (with TDS values characteristic of thermal waters from the Podhale basin) have been c. 170 mBq/dm3 for both isotopes [110]. The increased concentrations of radium isotopes in thermal waters of the Podhale basin are the result of contact between these waters and rocks of the Tatra crystalline massif (including gneisses, granites and schists) and intensified leaching of natural radionuclides out of these rocks by waters with increased temperatures [110].
The highest activity concentrations of uranium isotopes recorded in the Outer Carpathians (for particular water deposits) are 47.7 mBq/dm3 for 238U and 55.6 mBq/dm3 for 234U in Tylicz, and <0.5–15.6 mBq/dm3 for 238U and <0.5–161.7 mBq/dm3 for 234U in Krynica-Zdrój, while, in the Inner Carpathians, they are markedly increased only in the area of Poronin (41.9 mBq/dm3 for 238U and 58.8 mBq/dm3 for 234U).
Table 4. 222Rn, 226,228Ra, and 238,234U content in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters of the Carpathians with the hydrogeochemical background and value range in particular geological units of the Carpathians (according to [21,36,92,108,110,113,114,121,122,123,124,125].
Table 4. 222Rn, 226,228Ra, and 238,234U content in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters of the Carpathians with the hydrogeochemical background and value range in particular geological units of the Carpathians (according to [21,36,92,108,110,113,114,121,122,123,124,125].
Area, Geological Unit, Spa Town222Rn226Ra228Ra238U234U
HBV 1 Range of Measured Values
[Bq/dm3][mBq/dm3]
Carpathians:<0.2–104.2<3–85,500<10–2500<0.5–47.7<0.5–161.1
Outer Carpathians <0.2–76.1<3–1396<10–2500<0.5–47.7<0.5–161.1
Dębowiec 1.18190–1270110–13201.6
Iwonicz-Zdrój 1.17–5.87149–575<20–8770.52.5
Krynica-Zdrój <1–28.16–612<10–736<0.5–15.6<0.5–161.6
Lubatówka 2.32–3.21300–13961100–12712.7–3.14.2–7.1
Łomnica 65–11797–171
Muszyna 3.0–50.24–38012–270< 0.5–8.10.7–13.1
Piwniczna Zdrój 3.815–9621–731.3–25<0.5–10.4
Polańczyk 3.5070
Rabka-Zdrój<0.2246–638207–616<0.5–6.2<0.5–9.3
Rymanów-Zdrój 0.90–9.7580–75858–784
Szczawa 91–44147–340
Szczawnica 14–28215–1670.7–7.72.0–13.6
Szczawnik 14.231< 302.38.1
Tylicz 8.31306015.2–47.717–55.6
Ustroń 24.8–76.1<3–85,50014.1–17.74.6–18.73.2–14.0
Wysowa 29–106<20–400<0.50.6–2.1
Zabłocie 16002500
Żegiestów-Zdrój <3–56<10–97<0.5–3.6<0.5–7.7
Inner Carpathians<0.2–18.531–2260<10–3392.6–41.94.5–58.5
Bańska Niżna <0.2–8.5560–60269–1613.1–3.94.7–6.2
Białka Tatrzańska 3471163.65.1
Bukowina 3.15853391.212.5
Chochołów 2260<102.95.8
Poronin 250<1041.958.8
Zakopane <0.2–18.531–29119–302.6–2.84.5–7.5
Tatra granitoids0.7–610.2–104.2
Carpathian Foredeep 1.3–9.43–500<10–940
Busko-Zdrój 110–500240–300
Dobrowoda270100
Horyniec Zdrój 3.70–4.00<5<10
Las Winiarski
Latoszyn 4.60
Mateczny 1.30–8.32
Solec-Zdrój 340940
Swoszowice 9–9.43–431–541.3–3.73.8–6.2
Wełnin 4.30
Notes: 1 HBV, hydrogeochemical background value.
As for the other studied isotopes in the area of the Carpathian province shown in Table 5, the concentrations of isotope 210Pb in medicinal waters were only measured in a few spa towns. The highest values were recorded in Chochołów (102 mBq/dm3), Zakopane (8.2–73.5 mBq/dm3), Szczawnica (<5–56 mBq/dm3), and Rymanów-Zdrój (19–48 mBq/dm3). No available literature data on the ranges of 210Po activity concentration in the area of the Carpathian province were found, except for bottled water from Muszyna (Muszynianka), where the activity concentration of this isotope is 0.35 mBq/dm3 [126].
The activity concentrations of the isotope 40K in waters from various localities in the Outer Carpathians, the Inner Carpathians and the Carpathian Foredeep have a range of 23–23 400 mBq/dm3, 34.4–1372 mBq/dm3 and 120–5070 mBq/dm3, respectively, with the value of 23 400 mBq/dm3 (in Ustroń) significantly departing from the other results.
No tritium (3H) has been detected in medicinal waters from the area of the Carpathian Foredeep (Busko-Zdrój, Dobrowoda, Horyniec-Zdrój, and Las-Winiarski), which means that these waters have been recharged exclusively with pre-1952 precipitation [69]. Non-detectable to trace concentrations of tritium have been measured in groundwaters from the Inner Carpathians (0.0–0.25 mBq/dm3, except Zakopane (10.6–190 mBq/dm3)). The highest recorded value (190 mBq/dm3) refers to data from 1969. Control data from 2008 point to a marked drop in the so-called tritium curve and its gradual decline to a level close to natural [71,127]. Variability of the isotopic composition of waters over time may be due to the vulnerability of the aquifer system to the size and conditions of exploitation [78]. Results of tritium determination, often over 20 TU, have been obtained in the Outer Carpathians (e.g., in Wysowa, 0.0–63 mBq/dm3, and Krynica-Zdrój, 0.0–45 mBq/dm3), which indicates the contribution of modern (tritium) waters and the age of waters ranging from a few years to a few decades. The amount of available literature data on measured 14C content in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters in the area of the Carpathian province is insufficient to enable a satisfactory geochemical analysis.
Based on an analysis of the data shown in Table 4 and Table 5, it can be concluded that radioactivity of waters in the area of the Carpathian province is mainly due to the occurrence of the isotopes 226,228Ra and 40K and, more rarely, increased concentrations of 238,234U or 222Rn. In thermal waters within the Podhale basin (e.g., Bańska Niżna and Chochołów), the Magura nappe (Rabka-Zdrój) and the Silesian nappe (Ustroń), the activity concentration of 226Ra is higher than that of 228Ra, while, in thermal waters from the Polish Lowlands (Uniejów, Mszczonów or Grudziądz), an inverse relationship is observed.
Table 5. 210Pb, 210Po, 40K, 3H, and 14C content in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters in the Carpathians (according to [17,18,35,72,73,74,75,77,110,114,122,124,126,128,129,130,131,132,133]).
Table 5. 210Pb, 210Po, 40K, 3H, and 14C content in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters in the Carpathians (according to [17,18,35,72,73,74,75,77,110,114,122,124,126,128,129,130,131,132,133]).
Area, Geological Unit, Spa TownRange of Measured Values
210Pb210Po40K3H14C
[mBq/dm3][TU][%modC]
Carpathians:<5–10223–23,4000–1900.3–23.2
Outer Carpathians<5–56.723–23,4000–63
Dębowiec
Iwonicz Zdrój260–12200.2–7.8
Krynica-Zdrój<54390.0–45
Lubatówka56.7596–1210
Łomnica10–32
Muszyna0.3537–3960.0–13.8
Piwniczna Zdrój<55540.9–16.9
Polańczyk70–420
Rabka-Zdrój<5–16.92830
Rymanów-Zdrój19–48450–15000.0–1.0
Szczawa<5–21.4
Szczawnica<5–56359–548
Szczawnik
Tylicz<540–3500.0–20
Ustroń1201–23,400
Wysowa81–2230.0–63
Zabłocie
Żegiestów-Zdrój23–99040.3–26
Inner Carpathians8.2–10234.4–13720–1900.3–23.2
Bańska Niżna30–361320–13720.0–0.20.3–3.4
Białka Tatrzańska9.21091
Bukowina 15.35700.10.8
Chochołów1025700.253.2
Poronin34.40.023.2
Zakopane8.2–73.536.4–10710.5–190
Tatra granitoids
Carpathian Foredeep120–5070
Busko-Zdrój24000.00.0
Dobrowoda0.00.9
Horyniec-Zdrój250–2900.0
Las Winiarski36300.0
Latoszyn120
Mateczny0.0–14.52.1–18.5
Solec-Zdrój
Swoszowice9.7
Wełnin5070
The data presented in Table 4 and Table 5 indicate that, for the Carpathian region, relatively extensive datasets are available for isotopes 226Ra, 228Ra, and 222Rn, whereas data for 234U and 238U are more limited. For other isotopes, such as 40K and 3H, data are largely lacking, while, for 210Po, 210Pb, and 14C, the available information is sparse.

3.4. The Polish Lowlands

Groundwaters in the Polish Lowlands have the smallest amount of data on natural radioactive isotope content (Table 6 and Table 7). The medicinal waters, thermal waters, mineral waters and brines occurring in this area circulate in reservoir rocks belonging to two big European geological units: the East European Precambrian Platform and the West European Palaeozoic Platform [4]. Mineral waters in the area of the Polish Lowlands occur at various depths, and the biggest therapeutic significance is characteristic of deposits identified mainly in Lower Cretaceous and Lower Jurassic sandstone formations [134,135]. In the area of the Mid-Polish anticlinorium (in Inowrocław), mineral waters (bitter brines) used in therapeutic treatments are formed as a result of forced leaching of salt deposits [136]. Within the Palaeozoic platform (the Pomerania-Kołobrzeg anticlinorium, Połczyn-Zdrój, and Kamień Pomorski), there are thick Zechstein salt series with salt structures, which determine the predominance of sodium chloride mineral waters in this province [135]. A more detailed analysis of the location of the occurrences of medicinal, thermal and mineral waters and brines in the Polish Lowlands leads to a conclusion that such waters occur mainly in the area of the West European Palaeozoic Platform. The only exception is medicinal waters found in Sopot and Ustka. As the authors did not find any published data on natural radioactive isotope content in the waters from Ustka, Sopot is the only health resort in the area of the East European Precambrian Platform included in this study. This is the reason why the authors describe the medicinal waters, thermal waters, mineral waters and brines from the area of the Polish Lowlands together, without dividing this area into geological units.
The results of the analyses performed in the area of the Polish Lowlands demonstrate that 222Rn activity concentrations in groundwaters usually range from a few to about a dozen Bq/dm3 (Table 6). The highest values of 222Rn activity concentration have been measured in localities situated in the area of the Mid-Polish anticlinorium (Inowrocław, 17.5 Bq/dm3) and the Szczecin-Łódź-Miechów synclinorium (Kołobrzeg, measured value range: 2.20–8.62 Bq/dm3; Połczyn-Zdrój, 9.60 Bq/dm3). The highest values of 226Ra activity concentration have been detected in the area of the Kościerzyna-Puławy Synclinorium (Grudziądz, 2160 mBq/dm3), the Mid-Polish anticlinorium (Ciechocinek, 1970 mBq/dm3) and the Pomeranian anticlinorium (Połczyn-Zdrój, 1120 mBq/dm3, and Kamień Pomorski, 660 mBq/dm3). The highest activity concentrations of 228Ra (up to 3000 mBq/dm3—Połczyn-Zdrój) have also been measured in these localities, which suggests correlation between the presence of both radium isotopes in groundwaters of the same geological units.
The values of uranium (234,238U) concentration in waters from the Polish Lowlands have been less often published. The highest activity concentration of uranium isotopes has been recorded in the area of the Peribaltic Syncline, in Sopot (5.1 mBq/dm3 for 238U and 45.6 mBq/dm3 for 234U), where the main utilized aquifer is associated with Lower-Triassic sediments. However, the limited amount of available data suggests that the range of uranium isotope concentrations in the other geological units stays mostly at low levels (<0.5–1.5 mBq/dm3 for 238U and <0.5–1.19 mBq/dm3 for 234U).
As for the rest of the studied isotopes in the area of the Polish Lowlands shown in Table 7, the values of 210Pb concentration were only measured in thermal waters in the area of the Szczecin-Łódź-Miechów synclinorium. The highest activity concentrations of this isotope were recorded in Uniejów (24 mBq/dm3). In the area of the Polish Lowlands, no available literature data on concentration ranges of isotope 210Po were found, except for bottled water from Nałęczów (Nałęczowianka)—0.7 mBq/dm3 [126]. The activity concentrations of the isotope 40K in groundwaters from various localities in the Polish Lowlands stayed in the following ranges: 100–7110 mBq/dm3 in the Kościerzyna-Puławy synclinorium, 250–5280 mBq/dm3 in the Mid-Polish anticlinorium, and 164–5860 mBq/dm3 in the Szczecin-Łódź-Miechów synclinorium. The data for the isotopes 3H and 14C are currently insufficient for a more comprehensive geochemical analysis, which indicates a need for further systematic isotopic analyses in this region.
Based on an analysis of the data shown in Table 6 and Table 7, it can be concluded that radioactivity of waters in the area of the Polish Lowlands is mainly due to the occurrence of isotopes 40K and 226,228Ra and, more rarely, increased concentrations of 222Rn or 238,234U.

4. Discussion

The natural radioactive isotopes occurring in groundwaters regarded as medicinal waters in Poland can be divided into four groups: A. isotopes giving water its medicinal properties (222Rn), B. isotopes potentially harmful to the human body (222Rn, 226,228Ra, 238,234U, 210Pb, and 210Po), C. isotopes neutral to the human body (40K, 14C, and 3H) and D. isotopes used as tracers in hydrogeological analyses enabling characterizing the genesis of these waters, their age (groundwater transit time), intake recharge areas, flow paths, vulnerability to anthropogenic contamination, etc. (3H, 14C, 222Rn, 238,234U, 226,228Ra, 210Pb, and 210Po). 222Rn can be classified into all the groups, and its harmful or beneficial effect on the human body depends on the size of the effective dose, for which mainly its radioactive decay products are responsible. The 40K isotope is neutral to the human body, and 14C and 3H can be classified as tracer isotopes, neutral to the human body. The other isotopes can and do act as environmental tracers and, in increased concentrations, they can emit radiation carrying so much energy that absorbing it by a human may result in exceeding the allowable effective dose and cause undesirable effects, harmful to the human body (Figure 4). It should be noted here that the chemical effect of uranium, being a heavy metal, is more adverse to the human body than the physical effect of its isotopes, related to the emitted ionizing radiation.
While analyzing the available data on natural radioactive isotope content in medicinal waters including thermal waters and brines in the territory of Poland, it should be noted that very few analyses have been conducted and very few results are available. The data are particularly scarce in the area of the Polish Lowlands. The amount of existing and published data, i.e., data readily available for analyses, does not enable a broader in-depth interpretation either in hydrogeological or radiological terms, especially with regard to radiological protection. Only the aspect of 222Rn content in the area of the Sudetes is better documented due to recognizing this isotope as an agent giving a large number of groundwaters in this area medicinal properties. The broader scope of research into 222Rn hydrogeochemistry in the area of the Sudetes has made it possible to determine the hydrogeochemical background of 222Rn both for the whole unit and its smaller constituent geological units.
The highest values of 222Rn activity concentration have been recorded in the Sudetic province (C). From an analysis of data shown in Table 2 and Table 3, it can be concluded that the largest concentrations of the isotopes 222Rn and 226,228Ra occur in geological units built of uranium- and radium-rich crystalline rocks. Radium and radon are rarely found to enrich groundwaters circulating within sedimentary rocks (the Intrasudetic Basin). On the other hand, the highest concentrations of the isotopes 238,234U in groundwaters are found in the area of a unit built of sedimentary rocks, characterized by much lower Rn and Ra content [85]. This proves a significant influence of hydrochemical characteristics of groundwaters on the transport of natural radioactive isotopes. Specific concentrations of radon, radium and uranium isotopes are characteristic of particular constituent geological units of the Sudetes. Characterizing these concentrations could be a tool enabling distinguishing groundwaters from different geological units of the Sudetes. This is one of the numerous manifestations of the mosaic-like geologic setup of the Sudetes, where the neighboring units are characterized by significantly different mineral and chemical composition of rocks, including the reservoir rocks of groundwaters, also medicinal waters. In the area of the Sudetes, radioactivity of groundwaters, including medicinal waters, is related primarily to the concentration of 222Rn dissolved in it, while waters containing large concentrations of the isotopes 226,228Ra are much less common and those with increased concentrations of 238,234U even rarer. The data on 222Rn, 226Ra, and partly 228Ra, are the main database of knowledge on radionuclides dissolved in spa waters in the area of the Sudetes. Determinations of uranium isotopes are much less complete, and data for the isotopes 210Pb, 210Po, 3H and 14C are currently insufficient for a more complete geochemical analysis. This is a significant limitation in the assessment of the influence of geological environment on radioactivity of groundwaters, which points to a need for conducting further systematic isotopic analyses in the region so that their results can be used for describing the hydrogeochemical and radiological characteristics of particular isotopes and groundwaters recognized as medicinal and potentially medicinal and their reservoir rocks. A characteristic feature of the Sudetes is the occurrence of medicinal and potentially medicinal waters with the highest concentrations of radon (the isotope 222Rn) and uranium isotopes, both 238U and 234U, in Poland. It should also be noted that, in some medicinal waters in the area of the Sudetes, the activity concentrations of 222Rn, 226Ra and 228Ra exceed the parametric values and derived concentrations for waters intended for human consumption. In one case, a 210Pb concentration in excess of the derived concentration was also recorded.
Based on an analysis of the data shown in Table 4 and Table 5, it can be concluded that the radioactivity of waters in the area of the Carpathian province is mainly due to the occurrence of the isotopes 226,228Ra and 40K and, more rarely, increased concentrations of 238,234U or 222Rn. Increased concentrations of the isotopes 40K and 226,228Ra are associated chiefly with brines and thermal waters with increased TDS content. Thermal waters and brines also occur in the Polish Lowlands, where they are also characterized by increased concentrations of primarily 40K and 226,228Ra. It is worth noting, however, that, in thermal waters within the Carpathians, in particular in the Podhale Basin (e.g., Bańska Niżna and Chochołów), the Magura nappe (Rabka-Zdrój) and the Silesian nappe (Ustroń), the activity concentration of 226Ra is higher than that of 228Ra, while, in thermal waters from the Polish Lowlands (Uniejów, Mszczonów or Grudziądz), an inverse relationship is observed. The highest concentrations of the isotopes 40K and 226,228Ra are characteristic of waters with the highest TDS content, i.e., brines and thermal brines. Although both brines and thermal waters can be used in drinking treatments only exceptionally, it must be remembered that, in the Carpathians, derived concentrations of 226Ra and 228Ra in medicinal waters, including brines and thermal waters, are very often exceeded. A similar situation is also observed in the Polish Lowlands, where the concentrations of both radium isotopes also exceed the values of derived concentrations.
In the area of the Sudetes, medicinal waters are usually characterized by a smaller circulation depth and lower TDS content and temperature than waters from the area of the Carpathians and the Polish Lowlands. They are also characterized by increased concentrations, often in excess of the parametric values and derived concentrations for waters intended for human consumption, of such natural radioactive isotopes as 222Rn, 226Ra and 228Ra and, more rarely, 210Pb, as well as markedly increased concentration of 238U and 234U. In comparison, medicinal waters in the Carpathians and in the Polish Lowlands, including thermal waters and brines, are characterized by larger circulation depths and higher TDS content and temperature than waters from the Sudetes. What distinguishes medicinal waters from these areas from Sudetic waters are 226Ra and 228Ra concentrations exceeding the values of derived concentrations for waters intended for human consumption, as well as markedly increased concentrations of the isotope 40K. Additionally, waters of the Carpathians and waters from the Polish Lowlands differ in the ratio of radium isotope concentrations. In the Carpathians, 226Ra activity concentration is higher than that of 228Ra, whereas, in the waters of the Polish Lowlands, 226Ra activity concentration is lower than 228Ra activity concentration. This means that the decisive role in radium isotope transport is played by the chemical properties of this element and the physicochemical conditions in (medicinal) groundwaters and not by the processes related to radioactive transformations of the isotopes 226Ra and 228Ra belonging to different radioactive series (uranium–radium and thorium, respectively).
Differences in the ranges of activity concentrations of selected natural radioactive isotopes occurring in groundwaters regarded as medicinal and potentially medicinal waters in Poland divided into particular provinces, the Sudetes, the Carpathians and the Polish Lowlands, are shown in the diagrams in Figure 5.
The undetected or very low concentrations of the isotope 3H (tritium) usually indicate water recharged before the period of atmospheric nuclear testing, i.e., before 1952. Its presence, on the other hand, even in trace amounts, may indicate an admixture of modern waters [19,40,69]. The results of tritium determinations at a level between a few and c. 20 TU (2.36 Bq/dm3) suggest modern recharge of medicinal waters, i.e., after the start of atmospheric nuclear testing in 1952. As a rule, in each of the discussed geological units of Poland, waters with high TDS content and large circulation depths contain no tritium. These waters are mainly brines and some thermal waters with high TDS content. The maximum tritium content in medicinal waters in Poland is an order of magnitude lower than the parametric value for waters intended for human consumption, i.e., 100 Bq/dm3.
The scarcity of data on natural radioactive isotope content in groundwaters regarded as medicinal waters makes it difficult not only to fully describe the hydrogeochemical characteristics of these waters but especially to ensure the radiological safety of spa clients, patients and staff involved in using these waters in balneotherapeutic treatments. In order to define the specific requirements for radionuclide content in these waters, it would be necessary to start by defining limits of the activity concentration of particular isotopes in water intended for drinking treatment (internal exposure) based on the parametric values and derived concentrations defined for waters intended for human consumption. For other treatments, i.e., baths, showers, water jets, massages, etc. (external exposure), parametric values should be defined based on the measurements and calculations of the effective dose for each kind of treatment. To achieve these aims, extensive and methodical research as well as standardization of methods of administering treatments are necessary. Only based on the results of such work, the appropriate legal regulations could be introduced.
The authors propose that, in the case of the isotope 222Rn, which, as recognized by law in some countries including Poland, gives groundwaters medicinal properties according to the radiation hormesis theory, the maximum allowable activity concentration in water intended for drinking treatment should prevent patients from receiving an effective dose higher than half of the annual dose received by the general public from drinking water with 222Rn activity concentration equal to the parametric value, i.e., 100 Bq/dm3. With the assumed annual intake of 730 L, the maximum absorption of this isotope could reach 73,000 Bq. Assuming also that drinking treatment in a health resort requires drinking about 10 liters of water, the maximum activity concentration of 222Rn in medicinal radon water intended for drinking treatment should not exceed 3650 Bq/dm3. For the other natural radioactive isotopes, with unquestionably adverse effect on the human body, the authors propose that the maximum value of the activity concentration of each of these isotopes (238,234U, 226,228Ra, 210Pb, and 210Po) in medicinal water intended for drinking treatment should be the derived concentration resulting in receiving 20% of the annual effective dose from consuming 730 L of water (i.e., 0.02 mSv). Assuming the intake of 10 L of water during spa treatment, the maximum activity concentrations of 238U, 234U, 226Ra, 228Ra, 210Pb and 210Po in medicinal water intended for drinking treatment should be 43.8 Bq/dm3, 40.9 Bq/dm3, 7.3 Bq/dm3, 2.9 Bq/dm3, 2.9 Bq/dm3 and 1.5 Bq/dm3, respectively.

5. Conclusions

Among the catalogued 116 medicinal water deposits in Poland, the authors obtained data on natural radioactive isotope content in these waters only for 68 localities, also including thermal waters from several deposits not recognized as medicinal and several areas with the occurrence of potentially medicinal waters (e.g., radon waters in the area of the Sudetes and in the Tatra Mts in the Carpathians). These localities include 1 out of 5 deposits in the area of the East European (Precambrian) Platform, 13 localities out of 25 deposits in the area of the West European (Palaeozoic) Platform, 21 localities out of 20 deposits and several occurrences of potentially medicinal waters in the Sudetes, and 33 localities in the Carpathians out of 66 catalogued deposits in this mountain range. This overview shows how many medicinal water deposits and areas with the occurrence of potentially medicinal waters, and thermal waters not recognized as medicinal, lack data on natural radioactive isotope content. The largest number of available results of isotopic analyses in the area of Poland come from the Sudetes; a large amount of data was also obtained for the Carpathians, whereas the worst situation, in terms of our knowledge of the occurrence of natural radioactive isotopes in medicinal waters, is in the area of the Polish Lowlands, i.e., in the West-European and East-European platforms. As a result, it has only been possible so far to determine the hydrogeochemical background for 222Rn, and only in the area of the Sudetes and their constituent geological units, and one small geological unit of the Carpathians (the Tatra granitoids).
The collected and analyzed data allow a conclusion that we can distinguish three types of groundwater in terms of the content of natural radioactive isotopes associated with their occurrence in areas with different types of geological structure:
  • Medicinal waters in the area of the Sudetes (the Variscan orogen) are characterized by the highest values of the activity concentrations of 222Rn and the isotopes 238U and 234U in Poland. In some medicinal waters in the area of the Sudetes, the activity concentrations of 222Rn, 226Ra and 228Ra exceed the parametric values and derived concentrations for waters intended for human consumption. In one case, an exceeded derived concentration of 210Pb was also recorded. In terms of natural radioactive isotope content, medicinal waters of the Sudetes can be characterized as radium–uranium–radon waters (Rn > U > Ra; where 234U > 238U and 226Ra > 228Ra).
  • The radioactivity of medicinal waters of the Carpathians (the Alpine orogen) is mainly associated with the occurrence of the isotopes 226,228Ra and 40K and more rarely with increased concentrations of 238,234U or 222Rn. Increased concentrations of the isotopes 40K and 226,228Ra are associated chiefly with brines and thermal brines. A characteristic feature of Carpathian medicinal waters is the occurrence of 226Ra activity concentration higher than 228Ra activity concentration. In medicinal waters from this area, the derived concentrations of 226Ra and 228Ra defined for waters intended for human consumptions are very often exceeded. In terms of natural radioactive isotope content, medicinal waters of the Carpathians can be characterized as radium–potassium waters (K > Ra; where 226Ra > 228Ra).
  • Medicinal waters occurring in the Polish Lowlands (the East European Precambrian Platform and the West European Palaeozoic Platform) are characterized by increased concentrations of the isotopes 226,228Ra and 40K, whereas the concentrations of 222Rn and the isotopes 238,234U in these waters are very low. A characteristic feature of medicinal waters occurring in the Polish Lowlands is the presence of 228Ra activity concentration higher than 226Ra activity concentration, i.e., the opposite to the situation in Carpathian waters. In medicinal waters of this area, the derived concentrations of 226Ra and 228Ra defined for waters intended for human consumptions are also very often exceeded. In terms of natural radioactive isotope content, medicinal waters of the Polish Lowlands can be characterized as potassium–radium waters (Ra > K; where 228Ra > 226Ra).
Based on the above discussion it can be concluded that natural radioactive isotopes occurring in groundwaters recognized as medicinal or potentially medicinal in Poland can be divided into four groups. These are: A. isotopes giving waters medicinal properties (222Rn), B. isotopes potentially harmful to the human body (222Rn, 226,228Ra, 238,234U, 210Pb, and 210Po), C. isotopes neutral to the human body (40K, 14C, and 3H), and D. isotopes used as tracers in hydrogeological studies (3H, 14C, 222Rn, 238,234U, 226,228Ra, 210Pb, and 210Po).
Because of the insufficient number of research results concerning natural radioactive isotope content in medicinal waters in Poland, a complete and detailed description of their hydrogeochemical characteristics is currently impossible. It is also impossible to assess the potential radiation exposure of patients and treatment staff or to take appropriate radiological protection measures. The first and the easiest step to take based on guidelines on waters intended for human consumption should be to define the concentration limits of particular radioactive isotopes in groundwaters regarded as medicinal waters intended for drinking treatment. The authors propose setting the maximum content limits for 222Rn, 238U, 234U, 226Ra, 228Ra, 210Pb, and 210Po as 3650 Bq/dm3, 43.8 Bq/dm3, 40.9 Bq/dm3, 7.3 Bq/dm3, 2.9 Bq/dm3, 2.9 Bq/dm3 and 1.5 Bq/dm3, respectively.

Author Contributions

T.A.P.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft preparation, Writing—review and editing. D.C.: Data collection, Investigation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing—original draft preparation, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the project Minigrants for doctoral students of Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, grant number 50SD/0026/25.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Reviewers for their insightful comments and constructive suggestions, which have significantly improved the quality and clarity of the manuscript. During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used OpenAI GPT-based tools (GPT-5 chat model) for language editing and structuring of selected text fragments. The authors have carefully reviewed and edited all generated content and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
HBVHydrogeochemical background value
KMKarkonosze Massif
KMZKłodzko-Złoty Stok Masif
KUMKudowa Massif
LŚMCLądek-Śnieżnik Metamorphic Complex
OBMCOrlica-Bystrzyca Metamorphic Complex
IMCIzera Metamorphic Complex
RJMCRudawy Janowickie Metamorphic Complex
GSGBSowie Góry Gneissic Block
KŁMCMetamorphic Kłodzki Complex
KMCMetamorfik Kaczawski Complex
BUBardo Unit
ISBIntra-Sudetic Basin
NSBNorth Sudetic Basin
SBŚwiebodzice Basin
SSMStrzegom-Sobótka Massif
SMStrzelin Massif
NKMUNiemcza-Kamieniec Metamorfic Unit
SOBSilesian-Opole Basin
SŁMCSzczecin–Łódź–Miechów Synclinorium
KPCKościerzyna–Puławy Synclinorium
MPAMid-Polish Anticlinorium
PSPeribaltic Syncline

References

  1. Scholz, H. Heilendes Wasser. Lebensroman des „Wasserdoktors” Vinzenz Priessnitz; Leopold Stocker Verlag: Graz, Austria; Stuttgart, Germany, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  2. Owczynnikow, A.M. Mineral Waters; GOSGEOLTECHIZDAT: Moscow, Russia, 1963. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tołstichin, N.I.; Posochow, E.W. Mineral Waters; LGI: Leningrad, Russia, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  4. Paczyński, B.; Płochniewski, Z. Mineral and medicinal waters of Poland. Prz. Geol. 1997, 45, 558. [Google Scholar]
  5. Becker, K. One century of radon therapy. Int. J. Low Radiat. 2004, 1, 334–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Paczyński, B.; Sadurski, A. (Eds.) Regional Hydrogeology of Poland, Vol. 2: Mineral, Medicinal, Thermal, and Mine Waters; Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny: Warszawa, Poland, 2007.
  7. Kochański, J.W. Health Resort Medicine; Wyższa Szkoła Fizjoterapii: Wrocław, Poland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kochański, J.W.; Kochański, M. Physical Medicine; PHU Technomex: Gliwice, Poland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kiełczawa, B. Balneological use of geothermal springs in selected regions of the world. In Geothermal Water Management; Bundschuh, J., Tomaszewska, B., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; pp. 319–364. [Google Scholar]
  10. Serbulea, M.; Payyappallimana, U. Onsen (hot springs) in Japan—Transforming terrain into healing landscapes. Health Place 2012, 18, 1366–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Qi, Y.; Wang, Y. Effects of hot spring tourism on human health. Des. Eng. 2020, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Filippovits, E.; Gryszkiewicz, I.; Kopera, P.; Lasek-Woroszkiewicz, D.; Lasota, J.; Mikołajków, J. Zagospodarowanie Wód Leczniczych i Solanek w Polsce: Wg Stanu na 31 XII 2024 r. [Utilization of Medicinal Waters and Brines in Poland as of 31.12.2024]; Mikołajków, J., Ed.; Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny—Państwowy Instytut Badawczy: Warszawa, Poland, 2025; 377p.
  13. Geological and Mining Law Act of 9 June 2011. Journal of Laws 2024, Item 1290. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20240001290/U/D20241290Lj.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2026).
  14. Geological and Mining Law Act of 28 July 2005 on Spa Treatment, Health Resorts, and Spa Protection Areas and Spa Municipalities. Journal of Laws 2005, No. 167, Item 1399. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20051671399/U/D20051399Lj.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2026).
  15. Przylibski, T.A. Radon: A radioactive therapeutic element. In Radon, Health and Natural Hazards; Gillmore, G.K., Perrier, F.E., Crockett, R.G.M., Eds.; Geological Society: London, UK, 2018; Volume 451, pp. 209–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zuber, A.; Różański, K.; Ciężkowski, W. (Eds.) Tracer Methods in Hydrogeological Studies. Handbook of Methodology; Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej: Wrocław, Poland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zuber, A.; Rajchel, L. Origin of mineral waters of Mateczny, Kraków. In Współczesne Problemy Hydrogeologii XIII; University of Science and Technology: Kraków, Poland, 2007; pp. 995–1002. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zuber, A.; Małecki, J.J.; Duliński, M. Groundwater ages and altitudes of recharge areas in the Polish Tatra Mts. as determined from 3H, δ18O and δ2H data. Geol. Q. 2008, 52, 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  19. Małoszewski, P.; Stichler, W.; Zuber, A.; Rank, D. Identifying the flow systems in a karstic-fissured-porous aquifer, the Schneealpe, Austria, by modelling of environmental 18O and 3H isotopes. J. Hydrol. 2002, 256, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Walencik-Łata, A.; Kozłowska, B.; Przylibski, T.A. Hydrochemical behaviour of dissolved uranium in selected groundwaters of the Kłodzko Valley (SW Poland) and its application possibilities as an environmental tracer. Chemosphere 2021, 267, 128911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chau, N.D.; Duliński, M.; Jodłowski, P.; Nowak, J.; Różański, K.; Ślęziak, M.; Wachniew, P. Natural radioactivity in groundwater—A review. Isot. Environ. Health Stud. 2011, 47, 415–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 4th ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  23. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Radionuclides Notice of Data Availability Technical Support Document; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
  24. Polański, A. Basic Geochemistry; Wydawnictwa Geologiczne: Warszawa, Poland, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  25. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation: UNSCEAR 1993 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  26. Przylibski, T.A. Radon. Specific Component of Medicinal Waters in the Sudety Mountains; Wydział Geoinżynierii, Górnictwa i Geologii Politechniki Wrocławskiej: Wrocław, Poland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hrynkiewicz, A.Z. Man and Ionizing Radiation; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hem, J.D. Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water; U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2254; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 1985. [CrossRef]
  29. Macioszczyk, A.; Dobrzyński, D. Hydrogeochemia: Strefy Aktywnej Wymiany Wód Podziemnych; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  30. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Radiological protection against radon exposure. Ann. ICRP 2014, 43, 1–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The Environmental Behaviour of Polonium; Technical Reports Series No. 484; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  32. Szabo, Z.; Stackelberg, P.E.; Cravotta, C.A. Occurrence and geochemistry of lead-210 and polonium-210 radionuclides in public-drinking-water supplies from principal aquifers of the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 7236–7249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Przylibski, T.A. Shallow circulation groundwater—The main type of water containing hazardous radon concentration. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 11, 1695–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Girault, F.; Perrier, F.; Przylibski, T.A. Radon-222 and radium-226 occurrence in water: A review. In Radon, Health and Natural Hazards; Gillmore, G.K., Perrier, F.E., Crockett, R.G.M., Eds.; Geological Society: London, UK, 2018; Volume 451, pp. 131–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chau, N.D.; Rajchel, L.; Nowak, J.; Jodłowski, P. Radium isotopes in the Polish Outer Carpathian mineral waters of various chemical composition. J. Environ. Radioact. 2012, 112, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kozłowska, B.; Walencik, A.; Przylibski, T.A.; Dorda, J.; Zipper, W. Uranium, radium and radon isotopes in selected brines of Poland. Nukleonika 2010, 55, 519–522. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kowalska, A. Correlation Between the Occurrence of Increased Activity Concentrations of 226Ra and 228Ra and the Composition and Chemical Type of Groundwaters. Ph.D. Thesis, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland, 2017, unpublished. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  38. Hoehn, E.; von Gunten, H.R. Radon in groundwater: A tool to assess infiltration from surface waters to aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 1989, 25, 1795–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Florkowski, T. Natural production of radioactive noble gases in the geosphere. In Proceedings of the Consultants Meeting on Isotopes of Noble Gases as Tracers in Environmental Studies, Vienna, Austria, 29 May–2 June 1989; International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): Vienna, Austria, 1992; pp. 11–27. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ciężkowski, W.; Gröning, M.; Leśniak, P.M.; Weise, S.M.; Zuber, A. Origin and age of thermal waters in Cieplice Spa, Sudeten, Poland, inferred from isotope, chemical and noble gas data. J. Hydrol. 1992, 140, 89–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zuber, A.; Weise, S.M.; Osenbrück, K.; Grabczak, J.; Ciężkowski, W. Age and recharge area of thermal waters in Lądek Spa (Sudeten, Poland) deduced from environmental isotope and noble gas data. J. Hydrol. 1995, 167, 327–349. [Google Scholar]
  42. Cable, J.E.; Burnett, W.C.; Chanton, J.P.; Weatherly, G.L. Estimating groundwater discharge into the northeastern Gulf of Mexico using radon-222. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1996, 144, 591–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hussain, N.; Church, T.M.; Kim, G. Use of 222Rn and 226Ra to trace groundwater discharge into the Chesapeake Bay. Mar. Chem. 1999, 65, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Moise, T.; Starinsky, A.; Katz, A.; Kolodny, Y. Ra isotopes and Rn in brines and ground waters of the Jordan-Dead Sea Rift Valley: Enrichment, retardation, and mixing. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2000, 64, 2371–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kafri, U. Radon in groundwater as a tracer to assess flow velocities: Two test cases from Israel. Environ. Geol. 2001, 40, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Atkinson, A.P.; Cartwright, I.; Gilfedder, B.S.; Cendón, D.I.; Unland, N.P.; Hofmann, H. Using 14C and 3H to understand groundwater flow and recharge in an aquifer window. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 18, 4951–4964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Appleton, J.D. Radon in air and water. In Essentials of Medical Geology; Selinus, O., Alloway, B., Centeno, J.A., Finkelman, R.B., Fuge, R., Lindh, U., Smedley, P., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 239–277. [Google Scholar]
  48. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Radiation. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; Vol. 100D: A Review of Human Carcinogens; IARC, World Health Organization: Lyon, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  49. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The Environmental Behaviour of Radium: Revised Edition; Technical Reports Series No. 476; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  50. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Ionizing Radiation. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 78; Part 2: Some Internally Deposited Radionuclides; IARC, World Health Organization: Lyon, France, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  51. Regulation of the Minister of Health of 7 December 2017 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Journal of Laws 2017, Item 2294. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20170002294/O/D20172294.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2026).
  52. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiation Protection Against Radon in Workplaces Other Than Mines; Safety Reports Series No. 33; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  53. Council Directive 2013/51/EURATOM of 22 October 2013 laying down requirements for the protection of the health of the general public with regard to radioactive substances in water intended for human consumption. Off. J. Eur. Union 2013, L 296, 12–21.
  54. Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionizing radiation and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. Off. J. Eur. Union 2014, L 13, 1–73.
  55. Regulation of the Minister of Health of 13 April 2006 on the Scope of Studies Necessary to Determine the Therapeutic Properties of Natural Medicinal Resources and the Therapeutic Properties of Climate, the Criteria for Their Assessment, and the Model Certificate Confirming These Properties. Journal of Laws 2006, Item 565. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20060800565/O/D20060565.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2026).
  56. Regulation of the Minister of Health of 27 February 2018 on the publication of the consolidated text of the Regulation of the Minister of Health on the scope of examinations necessary to determine the medicinal properties of natural medicinal raw materials and the medicinal properties of climate, the criteria for their assessment, and the template of the certificate confirming such properties. Journal of Laws 2018, Item 605. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20180000605/O/D20180605.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2026).
  57. Olszewski, J.; Chodak, M.; Jankowski, J. Assessment of current radon exposure of health resort staff in Poland. Med. Pr. 2008, 59, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Walczak, K.; Olszewski, J.; Zmyślony, M. Estimate of radon exposure in geothermal spas in Poland. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2016, 29, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Atomic Law Act of 29 November 2000. Journal of Laws 2021, Items 623 and 784. Available online: https://api.sejm.gov.pl/eli/acts/DU/2021/1941/text.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2026).
  60. Milvy, P.; Cothern, C.R. Naturally occurring radionuclides in drinking water: An exercise in risk benefit analysis. Environ. Geochem. Health 1989, 11, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Skubacz, K.; Michalik, B. Modeling: Activity concentration of radon, thoron, and their decay products in closed systems. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Skubacz, K. Activity concentration of radon, thoron, and their decay products in an open system. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Uzun, S.K.; Demiröz, I. Radon and progeny sourced dose assessment of spa employees in balneological sites. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2016, 170, 331–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chamienia, A. Potassium balance—Theoretical foundations and daily medical practice. Chor. Serca I Naczyń 2004, 1, 97–107. [Google Scholar]
  65. Tolstykh, E.I.; Degteva, M.O.; Bougrov, N.G.; Napier, B.A. Body potassium content and radiation dose from 40K for the Urals population (Russia). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Richardson, R.B.; Dunford, D.W. Review of the ICRP tritium and 14C internal dosimetry models and their implementation in the Genmod-PC code. Health Phys. 2001, 81, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Stupnicka, E.; Stempień-Sałek, M. Regional Geology of Poland; Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego: Warszawa, Poland, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ciężkowski, W. A Study on the Hydrogeochemistry of Mineral and Thermal Waters in the Polish Sudety Mountains (SW Poland); Scientific Papers of the Institute of Geotechnics of the Technical University of Wrocław, No. 60; Monographs No. 19; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Wrocławskiej: Wrocław, Poland, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  69. Zuber, A.; Chowaniec, J.; Porwisz, B.; Najman, J.; Mochalski, P.; Śliwka, I.; Duliński, M.; Mateńko, T. Origin and age of mineral waters in the Busko Spa region determined from environmental tracers. In Wody siarczkowe w rejonie Buska; Lisik, R., Ed.; Wyd. XYZ: Kielce, Poland, 2010; pp. 125–149. [Google Scholar]
  70. Krawiec, A. New results of the isotope and hydrochemical investigations of therapeutical waters of Ciechocinek Spa. Prz. Geol. 1999, 47, 255–260. [Google Scholar]
  71. Małecki, J.J. The use of tracer methods in examining regional hydrogeological conditions of the Zakopane groundwater basin. Prz. Geol. 2007, 55, 1149–1161. [Google Scholar]
  72. Chowaniec, J. A Hydrogeological Study of the Western Part of the Polish Carpathians. Biul. Państw. Inst. Geol. 2009, 434, 1–98. [Google Scholar]
  73. Chowaniec, J.; Ciężkowski, W.; Duliński, M.; Józefko, I.; Porwisz, B.; Zuber, A. Chemical types of CO2-rich waters in the flysch Carpathians and the age of water. Biul. Państw. Inst. Geol. 2009, 436, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  74. Chowaniec, J.; Duliński, M.; Mochalski, P.; Najman, J.; Śliwka, I.; Zuber, A. Environmental tracers in thermal waters of the Podhale Basin. Prz. Geol. 2009, 57, 685–693. [Google Scholar]
  75. Chowaniec, J.; Gągulski, T.; Gorczyca, G.; Operacz, T. New data on hydrochemical and isotopic composition of the therapeutic water in the Iwonicz-Zdrój–Rudawka Rymanowska anticline. Biul. Państw. Inst. Geol. 2016, 466, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Porowski, A.; Dowgiałło, J. Application of selected geothermometers to exploration of low-enthalpy thermal water. The Sudetic geothermal region in Poland. Environ. Geol. 2009, 58, 1629–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Porwisz, B.; Radwan, J.; Chowaniec, J.; Zuber, A. Groundwaters of Piwniczna-Spa, their ages and recharge areas deduced from isotope data. Biul. Państw. Inst. Geol. 2011, 445, 485–494. [Google Scholar]
  78. Nowicki, Z.; Felter, A. Changes of groundwater isotopic composition in Krynica-Zdrój and Muszyna district under conditions of variable exploitation. Biul. Państw. Inst. Geol. 2013, 456, 431–436. [Google Scholar]
  79. Znosko, J. Map of tectonic units of Poland. In Tectonic Atlas of Poland; Znosko, J., Ed.; Polish Geological Institute: Warsaw, Poland, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  80. Narkiewicz, M.; Dadlez, R. Geological regional subdivision of Poland—General guidelines and proposed schemes of sub-Cenozoic and sub-Permian units. Prz. Geol. 2008, 56, 391–397. [Google Scholar]
  81. Karnkowski, P.H. Tectonic subdivision of Poland—The Polish Lowlands. Prz. Geol. 2008, 56, 895–903. [Google Scholar]
  82. Ciężkowski, W.; Chowaniec, J.; Górecki, W.; Krawiec, A.; Rajchel, L.; Zuber, A. Mineral and thermal waters of Poland. Prz. Geol. 2010, 58, 762–773. [Google Scholar]
  83. Ciężkowski, W.; Przylibski, T.A. Radon in waters from health resorts of the Sudety Mts. (SW Poland). Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1997, 48, 855–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kozłowska, B.; Hetman, A.; Zipper, W. Determination of 222Rn in natural water samples from health resorts in the Sudety Mountains by the liquid scintillation technique. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1999, 51, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Przylibski, T.A. Concentration of 226Ra in rocks of the southern part of Lower Silesia (SW Poland). J. Environ. Radioact. 2004, 75, 171–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Przylibski, T.A. Radon research in Poland: A review. Solid State Phenom. 2015, 238, 90–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ciężkowski, W.; Kiełczawa, B.; Liber-Makowska, E.; Przylibski, T.A.; Żak, S. Medicinal waters of the Sudetic region—Selected problems. Prz. Geol. 2016, 64, 671–682. [Google Scholar]
  88. Walencik-Łata, A.; Kozłowska, B.; Dodra, J.; Przylibski, T.A. The detailed analysis of natural radionuclides dissolved in spa waters of the Kłodzko Valley, Sudety Mountains, Poland. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 569–570, 1174–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Przylibski, T.A.; Górecka, J.; Kula, A.; Fijałkowska-Lichwa, L.; Zagożdżon, K.; Zagożdżon, P.; Miśta, W.; Nowakowski, R. 222Rn and 226Ra activity concentrations in groundwaters of southern Poland: New data and selected genetic relations. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2014, 301, 757–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Adamczyk-Lorenc, A. Hydrogeochemical background of radon in underground waters on the examples of the Kłodzko–Złotostocka granitoidal intrusion and the Lądek–Śnieżnik metamorphic unit. In Proceedings of the Conference “Zagadnienia Interdyscyplinarne w Górnictwie i Geologii”, Szklarska Poręba, Poland, 23–25 March 2006; Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej: Wrocław, Poland, 2006; pp. 51–62. [Google Scholar]
  91. Domin, E. Potentially Medicinal Radon Waters of the Fore-Sudetic Block. Ph.D. Thesis, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, Wrocław, Poland, 2018, unpublished. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  92. Przylibski, T.A.; Domin, E.; Górecka, J.; Kowalska, A. 222Rn concentration in groundwaters circulating in granitoid massifs of Poland. Water 2020, 12, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Malczewski, D.; Teper, L.; Dorda, J. Assessment of natural and anthropogenic radioactivity levels in rocks and soils in the environs of Świeradów-Zdrój in the Sudetes, Poland, by in situ gamma-ray spectrometry. J. Environ. Radioact. 2004, 73, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Mazur, S.; Aleksandrowski, P.; Szczepański, J. Outline structure and tectonic evolution of the Variscan Sudetes. Prz. Geol. 2010, 58, 133–145. [Google Scholar]
  95. Przylibski, T.A.; Żak, S.; Maciejewski, P. Hydrogeological Documentation Defining Exploitable Resources of Medicinal Radon Water from the Well of Szrenica Intake; Wrocław, Poland, 2024. unpublished. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  96. Przylibski, T.A.; Adamczyk-Lorenc, A.; Żak, S. Areas of the occurrence of potentially medicinal radon water in the Sudetes. In Radon Potential of the Sudetes with Determination of Potentially Medicinal Radon Water Areas; Wołkowicz, S., Ed.; Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny: Warszawa, Poland, 2007; pp. 107–167. [Google Scholar]
  97. Przylibski, T.A. Origin of radon in waters of the fissure spring No. 26 in Kowary (Sudety Mountains, SW Poland). Prz. Geol. 1999, 47, 740–742. [Google Scholar]
  98. Przylibski, T.A. Radon in the hydrosphere—Origin, transport, release, measurement methods, de-radoning techniques, and legal aspects of radon water utilization. In Current Legal Framework for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and Electromagnetic Fields in the Range 0–300 GHz in Poland; Zmyślony, M., Nowosielska, E.M., Eds.; Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna (WAT): Warszawa, Poland, 2021; pp. 323–344. [Google Scholar]
  99. Kozłowska, B.; Walencik, A.; Dorda, J. Natural radioactivity and dose estimation in underground water from the Sudety Mountains in Poland. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2008, 128, 331–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Przylibski, T.A.; Fijałkowska, L.; Bielecka, A. Potentially therapeutic radon waters of the Ślęża Massif. Prz. Geol. 2008, 56, 763–771. [Google Scholar]
  101. Przylibski, T.A.; Górecka, J. 222Rn activity concentration differences in groundwaters of three Variscan granitoid massifs in the Sudetes (NE Bohemian Massif, SW Poland). J. Environ. Radioact. 2014, 134, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Przylibski, T.A.; Żak, S.; Kowalska, A.; Domin, E. Composition of gas dissolved in thermal water extracted from borehole KT-1 at Karpniki (Karkonosze granite area, Sudetes). Prz. Geol. 2018, 66, 483–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Przylibski, T.A.; Staśko, S.; Domin, E. Radon groundwater in a radon-prone area: Possible uses and problems—An example from the southwestern part of the Kłodzko Valley, Sudetes, SW Poland. Environ. Geochem. Health 2022, 44, 4539–4555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Jobbágy, V.; Chmielewska, I.; Kovács, T.; Chałupnik, S. Uranium determination in water samples with elevated salinity from southern Poland by micro coprecipitation using alpha spectrometry. Microchem. J. 2009, 93, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Walencik, A.; Kozłowska, B.; Dorda, J.; Przylibski, T.A.; Zipper, W. Natural radioactivity of groundwater from the Przerzeczyn-Zdrój Spa. Nukleonika 2010, 55, 169–175. [Google Scholar]
  106. Nowak, J. Natural Radioactivity of Thermal Waters of the Carpathians. Ph.D. Thesis, Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza, Kraków, Poland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  107. Łukaczyński, I.; Polaczek, P. Hydrogeological Documentation Defining the Exploitable Resources of Thermal Water Intake KT-1 in Karpniki near Jelenia Góra; Wektor Inwestycje Ltd.: Gliwice, Poland, 2014. unpublished. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  108. Chmielewska, I.; Chałupnik, S.; Wysocka, M.; Smoliński, A. Radium measurements in bottled natural mineral-, spring- and medicinal waters from Poland. Water Resour. Ind. 2020, 24, 100133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Romanova, A.; Porowski, A.; Zielski, T.; Dancewicz, A. Origin and evolution of the chemical composition of mineral waters of Szczawno-Zdrój inferred from long-term variation of ionic ratios, Sudetes Mts. (SW Poland). Environ. Earth Sci. 2021, 80, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chau, N.D.; Nowak, J. Natural Radioactivity in Thermal Waters: A Case Study from Poland. Energies 2021, 14, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Prusak, J.; Przylibski, T.A. Potentially medicinal radon waters of the eastern part of the High Ridge in the Izera Range (Sudetes), containing the greatest radon concentration in Poland. Prz. Geol. 2023, 71, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Dobrzyński, D.; Tetfejer, K.; Stępień, M.; Karasiński, J.; Tupys, A.; Słaby, E. Geochemistry of germanium in thermal waters of the Jelenia Góra geothermal system (Sudetes, Poland): Solute relationships and aquifer mineralogy. Ann. Soc. Geol. Pol. 2023, 93, 323–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Pachocki, K.A.; Wieprzowski, K.; Bekas, M.; Różycki, Z. Occurrence of radon 222Rn in curative waters. Rocz. PZH 2009, 60, 129–136. [Google Scholar]
  114. Pachocki, K.A.; Wieprzowski, K.; Różycki, Z.; Bekas, M.; Latour, T. Natural radioactivity of potassium 40K in curative and natural mineral waters and dose estimation. Rocz. PZH 2011, 62, 19–25. [Google Scholar]
  115. Birkenmajer, K. A Geological Guide to the Pieniny Klippen Belt; Wydawnictwa Geologiczne: Warszawa, Poland, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  116. Rajchel, L. Balneological resources of the Carpathian Province. Acta Balneol. 2016, 58, 275–278. [Google Scholar]
  117. Książkiewicz, M. Geology of Poland, Vol. 4: Tectonics, Part 3: The Carpathians; Wydawnictwa Geologiczne: Warszawa, Poland, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  118. Żytko, K. Correlation of main structural units of the Western and Eastern Carpathians. Pr. Państw. Inst. Geol. 1999, 168, 135–164. [Google Scholar]
  119. Oszczypko, N. The structural position and tectonosedimentary evolution of the Polish Outer Carpathians. Prz. Geol. 2004, 52, 780–791. [Google Scholar]
  120. Gawęda, A.; Burda, J.; Klötzli, U.; Golonka, J.; Szopa, K. Episodic construction of the Tatra granitoid intrusion (Central Western Carpathians, Poland/Slovakia): Consequences for the geodynamics of the Variscan collision and the Rheic Ocean closure. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2016, 105, 1153–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  121. Kochowska, E.; Mazur, J.; Kozak, K.; Janik, M. Radon in well waters in the Kraków area. Isot. Environ. Health Stud. 2004, 40, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Kozłowska, B.; Walencik, A.; Dorda, J.; Przylibski, T.A. Uranium, radium and 40K isotopes in bottled mineral waters from the Outer Carpathians, Poland. Radiat. Meas. 2007, 42, 1380–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Chau, N.D. Natural radionuclides of selected mineral and therapeutic waters. Acta Balneol. 2018, 60, 223–228. [Google Scholar]
  124. Chau, N.D.; Rajchel, L.; Nowak, J. Natural radioactive elements and chemical composition of some mineral waters of Poland (Polish Carpathians, Carpathian Foredeep). In Advances in Liquid Scintillation Spectrometry (LSC 2008); Eikenberg, J., Jäggi, M., Beer, H., Baehrle, H., Eds.; Radiocarbon: Tucson, AZ, USA, 2009; pp. 381–390. [Google Scholar]
  125. Chau, N.D.; Rajchel, L.; Nowak, J. Temporary variation of natural radionuclide concentrations in selected mineral therapeutic waters of the Polish Carpathians. Prz. Geol. 2017, 65, 1031–1034. [Google Scholar]
  126. Skwarzec, B.; Strumińska, D.I.; Boryło, A. Radionuclides of 210Po, 234U and 238U in drinking bottled mineral water in Poland. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2003, 256, 361–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Chowaniec, J.; Najman, J.; Olszewska, B.; Zuber, A. The origin and age of mineral water in Dobrowoda near Busko-Zdrój. Prz. Geol. 2009, 57, 286–293. [Google Scholar]
  128. Ciężkowski, W.; Doktór, S.; Graniczny, M.; Kabat, T.; Liber-Madziarz, E.; Przylibski, T.; Teisseyre, B.; Wiśniewska, M.; Zuber, A. An Attempt to Determine Recharge Areas of Medicinal Waters of Infiltration Origin in Poland Based on Isotopic Analyses; Archiwum ZB-U ZDROJE: Wrocław, Poland, 1996. unpublished. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  129. Porwisz, B.; Chowaniec, J.; Gorczyca, G.; Kowalski, J.; Koziara, T. Hydrogeological Documentation of Safe Yields of Medicinal Waters and Accompanying or Separately Occurring Potentially Medicinal Waters in the Carpathians and the Carpathian Foredeep. Part 4. Assignment A1: CO2-Rich and Carbonated Waters in Selected Regions of the Carpathians; Centralne Archiwum Geologiczne Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego: Warszawa, Poland, 2002.
  130. Chowaniec, J.; Freiwald, P.; Operacz, T. The diversity of the Małopolskie Voivodeship groundwaters and their usage. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Sklodowska 2012, 67, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Baran, A.; Halas, S. Isotope study of therapeutic waters from Horyniec Spa, SE Poland. Isot. Environ. Health Stud. 2010, 46, 454–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Baran, I.; Baran, A.; Chmiel, S.; Pelc, A.; Hałas, S. Isotopic investigation of δ18O, δD, and δ37Cl of selected mineral waters in the Subcarpathian area. Prz. Geol. 2015, 63, 172–178. [Google Scholar]
  133. Chau, N.D.; Rajchel, L.; Duliński, M. 210Pb activity in selected groundwaters from the Polish Carpathians. Biul. Państw. Inst. Geol. 2009, 436, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  134. Górecki, W.; Hajto, M. Classification and assessment methods of geothermal energy resources. In Atlas of Geothermal Resources of Mesozoic Formations in the Polish Lowlands; Górecki, W., Ed.; GOLDRUK; AGH University of Science and Technology: Kraków, Poland, 2006; pp. 152–163. [Google Scholar]
  135. Krawiec, A. Therapeutic waters as geotourism values of the Polish Baltic Sea coast. Geoturystyka 2012, 28–29, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Król, E.; Kot, A. Influence of mineral resources on space management in communes where spas are located. Gospod. Surowcami Miner.—Miner. Resour. Manag. 2010, 26, 21–40. [Google Scholar]
  137. Wojtkowska, M.; Wojtkowski, K.; Długosz-Lisiecka, M. Assessment of heavy metals and radionuclide concentrations in selected mineral waters available on the Polish market. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 11401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Krawiec, A.; Dulski, K. Therapeutic waters in Połczyn-Zdrój. Prz. Geol. 2004, 52, 147–150. [Google Scholar]
Figure 2. Simplified geological map of the Sudetic province with the most important occurrences of medicinal and thermal waters marked as blue rhombuses with the name of localization (according to [82]; slightly modified by the authors).
Figure 2. Simplified geological map of the Sudetic province with the most important occurrences of medicinal and thermal waters marked as blue rhombuses with the name of localization (according to [82]; slightly modified by the authors).
Water 18 01659 g002
Figure 3. Simplified geological-structural map of the Polish Carpathians and the Carpathian Foredeep with the most important occurrences of medicinal and thermal waters marked as green rhombuses with the name of localization (according to [72,117,118,119] slightly modified by the authors).
Figure 3. Simplified geological-structural map of the Polish Carpathians and the Carpathian Foredeep with the most important occurrences of medicinal and thermal waters marked as green rhombuses with the name of localization (according to [72,117,118,119] slightly modified by the authors).
Water 18 01659 g003
Figure 4. Division of natural radioactive isotopes occurring in medicinal waters according to their use and the effect on the human body.
Figure 4. Division of natural radioactive isotopes occurring in medicinal waters according to their use and the effect on the human body.
Water 18 01659 g004
Figure 5. Diagrams showing ranges of activity concentrations (for 222Rn in Bq/dm3; for other isotopes in mBq/dm3) of selected natural radioactive isotopes in medicinal waters of Poland, divided into particular provinces: the Sudetes, the Carpathians and the Polish Lowlands. Subfigures: A for 222Rn, B for 40K, C for 226Ra, D for 228Ra, E for 238U and F for 234U.
Figure 5. Diagrams showing ranges of activity concentrations (for 222Rn in Bq/dm3; for other isotopes in mBq/dm3) of selected natural radioactive isotopes in medicinal waters of Poland, divided into particular provinces: the Sudetes, the Carpathians and the Polish Lowlands. Subfigures: A for 222Rn, B for 40K, C for 226Ra, D for 228Ra, E for 238U and F for 234U.
Water 18 01659 g005
Table 1. Radiological requirements that should be met by water intended for human consumption, and derived concentrations for selected natural radioactive isotopes dissolved in water (based on data from [51]).
Table 1. Radiological requirements that should be met by water intended for human consumption, and derived concentrations for selected natural radioactive isotopes dissolved in water (based on data from [51]).
Radioactive IsotopeParametric Value (for 222Rn and 3H) or Derived Concentration 1
[Bq/dm3]
14C240
3H100 2
222Rn100
238U3
234U2.8
226Ra0.5
228Ra0.2
210Pb0.2
210Po0.1
Notes: 1 The concentration for which the calculated dose is 0.1 mSv/year with annual water consumption of 730 dm3 and the absorbed-dose coefficient adopted in the Polish atomic law [59]. 2 100 Bq is equivalent to c. 847 TU (tritium units).
Table 2. 222Rn, 226,228Ra, and 238,234U content in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters of the Sudetes with the hydrogeochemical background and the range of values in particular geological units of the Sudetes (according to [26,37,87,88,91,92,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112]).
Table 2. 222Rn, 226,228Ra, and 238,234U content in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters of the Sudetes with the hydrogeochemical background and the range of values in particular geological units of the Sudetes (according to [26,37,87,88,91,92,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112]).
Area, Geological Unit, Spa Town222Rn226Ra228Ra238U234U
Hydrogeochemical BackgroundRange of Measured ValuesRange of Measured Value
[Bq/dm3][mBq/dm3]
Sudetes:4–3060.1–3368<0.05–1360<1–840<0.5–725<0.5–964
KM16–6900.3–1282<0.05–3005–380<0.05–43.38<0.5–52.08
Cieplice Śląskie-Zdrój 8.8–1635–675–16<0.5<0.5
Karpniki 245–290.1<0.061
Kowary 374–650503802.35–43.384.68–52.08
Sosnówka 177–315220–300
Staniszów 116.4–174
Szklarska Poręba 931–1282<0.05–0.10
KMZ10–1401.0–287.3
KUM3.9–1090.9–143.9
LŚMC 0.3–1852
Lądek-Zdrój 110–1413<3–1795–130.950.61
OBMC8–3090.3–16440–1397–91<0.5–4.32<0.5–6.24
Bobrowniki Stare 122–16494<202.10–4.324.73–6.24
Długopole-Zdrój 54.9–13740–13917–91<0.5–0.5<0.5–1.2
Szczawina 117–1529271.02.1
IMC17–890<0.2–336811–1360<6–730
Czerniawa-Zdrój 14.3–12911–1250<6–730
Szklarska Poręba 19.5–3368
Świeradów-Zdrój <0.2–200516–13605–6702.4–29.44.3–46.9
RJMC3–363.2–161.3
GSGB6–470.6–71.9
KŁMC2.2–13.82.2–13.8
KMC3–620.6–113
BU4–243.8–100.1
ISB4–500.1–325.622–1260<1–8401.0–7251.9–964
Duszniki-Zdrój 3.8–91.732–1260<20–8401.1–812.5–239
Gorzanów 2.8–17.822–80
Jedlina Zdrój 40.2–24927–17069–1581.0–542.4–366
Jeleniów 24.8–10935–550<6–251.1–332.6–158
Kudowa-Zdrój 4.3–66.150–703<20–3201.2–221.9–75
Polanica-Zdrój 4.3–27.1121–1200<2–1433.3–8.17.3–27
Szczawno-Zdrój 8.8–325.639–950<1–804–72512.1–964
NSB4–551.4–146.8
SB2.6–20.82.6–20.8
Fore-Sudetic Block:2–470.4–818
SSM 0.4–415.5
Sobótka 1.0–335
SM1.4–400.5–119.4
NKMU 0.7–176
Przerzeczyn-Zdrój 13–17618.9–31.533–643.9–14.816.2–55
KMC2–220.4–34.9
GSGB1–350.6–65.3
SOB2–180.6–41.7
Notes: 1 not available. Background values and ranges were not determined for the areas for which the authors did not have a sufficient amount of data.
Table 3. 210Pb, 210Po, 40K, 3H, and 14C content in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters of the Sudetes (according to [20,37,40,76,93,101,102,106,107,110,112,113,114]).
Table 3. 210Pb, 210Po, 40K, 3H, and 14C content in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters of the Sudetes (according to [20,37,40,76,93,101,102,106,107,110,112,113,114]).
Area, Geological Unit, Spa townRange of Measured Values
210Pb210Po40K3H14C
[mBq/dm3][TU][%modC] 1
Sudetes:18.64—740
KM
Cieplice Śląskie-Zdrój4.125.10.0—1.71.1—105
Karpniki0.00.0
Kowary
Sosnówka
Staniszów0.05.5
Szklarska Poręba
KMZ
KUM
LŚMC
Lądek-Zdrój29.318.640.0–1.016.5–32
OBMC
Bobrowniki Stare
Długopole-Zdrój
Szczawina485–6092.2–14.7
IMC
Czerniawa-Zdrój
Szklarska Poręba
Świeradów-Zdrój
RJMC
GSGB
KŁMC
KMC
BU
ISB23.41–7400.0–35.1
Duszniki-Zdrój54723.412.2–35.1
Gorzanów
Jedlina Zdrój250
Jeleniów1.9–13.5
Kudowa-Zdrój0.0–28.8
Polanica-Zdrój0.0–23.4
Szczawno-Zdrój330–740
NSB
SB
Fore-Sudetic Block:
SSM
Sobótka
SM
NKMU
Przerzeczyn-Zdrój
KMC
GSGB
SOB
Notes: 1 [%modC] the percentage of modern carbon, i.e., the percentage of 14C in a sample relative to international radiocarbon standard (100% modC corresponds to the activity of 0.226 Bq/g C).
Table 6. 222Rn, 226,228Ra, and 238,234U content in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters of the Polish Lowlands with the hydrogeochemical background and the range of values in particular geological units (according to [36,37,70,106,110,113,135,137]).
Table 6. 222Rn, 226,228Ra, and 238,234U content in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters of the Polish Lowlands with the hydrogeochemical background and the range of values in particular geological units (according to [36,37,70,106,110,113,135,137]).
Area, Geological Unit, Spa Town222Rn226Ra228Ra238U234U
HBV Range of Measured Values
[Bq/dm3][mBq/dm3]
SŁMC1.9–9.6040–112051–300<0.5–1.5<0.5–0.96
Kamień Pomorski 660800
Kołobrzeg 2.20–8.63470
Mszczonów 2.941511.5<0.5
Poddębice 5.34062<0.5<0.5
Połczyn-Zdrój 9.6011203000
Świnoujście 3.16–3.47
Uniejów 1.9–2.1560597–609<0.50.96
KPC 1.36–4.9070–216016–2170
Grudziądz4.9021602170
Konstancin Jeziorna 3.88
Nałęczów 1.36–1.5770160.811.19
MPA 2.20–17.540–197014–2100
Ciechocinek2.40–5.0219702100
Inowrocław 17.5
Wieniec-Zdrój 3.304014
PS
Sopot 6.8047010205.145.6
Table 7. 210Pb,210Po,40K,3H, and 14C content in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters of the Polish Lowlands (according to [106,110,114,126,135,137,138].
Table 7. 210Pb,210Po,40K,3H, and 14C content in medicinal and potentially medicinal waters of the Polish Lowlands (according to [106,110,114,126,135,137,138].
Area, Geological Unit, Spa Town Range of Measured Values
210Pb 210Po 40K 3H 14C
[mBq/dm3] [TU] [%modC]
SŁMC3.2–24164–5860
Kamień Pomorski3100
Kołobrzeg4730
Mszczonów3.2930
Poddębice5.3164
Połczyn-Zdrój15400.029.2
Świnoujście2760–3070
Uniejów24640–5860
KPC100–7110
Grudziądz7110
Konstancin Jeziorna5540
Nałęczów0.7100–151
MPA250–5280
Ciechocinek360–52800.0–24.2
Inowrocław<650–2090
Wieniec-Zdrój 250
PS
Sopot
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Przylibski, T.A.; Ciapka, D. Three Types of Natural Radioactivity in Groundwaters. Water 2026, 18, 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18141659

AMA Style

Przylibski TA, Ciapka D. Three Types of Natural Radioactivity in Groundwaters. Water. 2026; 18(14):1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18141659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Przylibski, Tadeusz Andrzej, and Dominika Ciapka. 2026. "Three Types of Natural Radioactivity in Groundwaters" Water 18, no. 14: 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18141659

APA Style

Przylibski, T. A., & Ciapka, D. (2026). Three Types of Natural Radioactivity in Groundwaters. Water, 18(14), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18141659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop