Next Article in Journal
Evaluating IMERG Satellite Precipitation-Based Design Storms in the Conterminous U.S. Using NOAA Atlas Datasets
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Biosorption of Triarylmethane Dyes by Immobilized Trametes versicolor and Pleurotus ostreatus: Optimization, Kinetics, and Reusability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Agricultural Activities and Hydrological Processes Drive Nitrogen Pollution and Transport in Polder Waters: Evidence from Hydrochemical and Isotopic Analysis

1
Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Eco-Environmental Changes and Carbon Sequestration of the Dongting Lake Basin, School of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
2
Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(17), 2601; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172601
Submission received: 11 August 2025 / Revised: 24 August 2025 / Accepted: 1 September 2025 / Published: 3 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Water Quality and Contamination)

Abstract

Excessive nitrogen export from lowland polders is a key contributor to cultural eutrophication in downstream aquatic ecosystems. This study investigated the spatiotemporal characteristics, migration pathways, and sources of nitrogen pollution in a typical polder system. Eight surface water sampling campaigns were conducted at 13 sites in Quyuan Polder, Dongting Lake, from 2022 to 2023, combining ArcGIS spatial analysis, multivariate statistics, and dual-isotope (δ15N-NO), δ18O-NO3) techniques. Nitrate and ammonium nitrogen dominated the nitrogen pool, accounting for ~76% of total nitrogen. Concentrations were higher in the dry season (2.48 mg/L) than in the wet season (1.89 mg/L) and differed significantly among hydrological periods (p < 0.05). Within the polder, total nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen were elevated, whereas nitrate nitrogen was higher at the outlet, reflecting distinct nitrogen profiles along the hydrological gradient. Nitrogen transport patterns were largely consistent with flow direction, driven by both upstream inputs and in situ generation. Isotopic signatures indicated that nitrate originated mainly from ammonium fertilizer and soil nitrogen, with contributions from manure and sewage. These findings enhance understanding of nitrogen dynamics in lowland catchments and provide a scientific basis for targeted pollution control in polder waters.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Agricultural non-point source nitrogen (N) pollution has emerged as a major environmental concern in lowland catchments, where intensive cultivation, excessive fertilizer use, and poor drainage conditions contribute to deteriorating water quality and ecological degradation [1]. Among these landscapes, polder systems—hydraulically managed low-lying farmlands enclosed by dikes—play a prominent role due to their spatial extent, agricultural productivity, and altered hydrological regimes [2,3]. In China, over 200 polders in the Dongting Lake Basin account for nearly 70% of the lake’s area and support intensive rice cultivation and aquaculture [4]. However, the semi-enclosed nature of polder hydrology, characterized by weak water exchange and long residence times, facilitates the accumulation and in situ transformation of reactive nitrogen, increasing the risk of downstream eutrophication [5]. Despite their ecological vulnerability and importance to food security, current studies have rarely examined the internal transport processes, transformation pathways, and seasonal dynamics of nitrogen pollution within these semi-closed systems. This knowledge gap limits our ability to design effective, region-specific mitigation strategies for nitrogen management in polder-dominated lowland basins [6].
The stable nitrogen (N) and oxygen (O) isotope compositions (δ15N-NO3, δ18O-NO3,) of NO3 provide unique isotopic fingerprints that can be utilized to discriminate among nitrogen sources. Accurate measurement of these isotopic ratios in aquatic systems enables the identification of multiple pollution sources, including chemical fertilizers, livestock and poultry wastewater, and domestic sewage [7]. However, in regions where multiple nitrate sources coexist, their isotopic signatures may overlap, making it difficult to differentiate among sources., which hinders the distinction between sources. As a result, dual-isotope analysis has not always yielded definitive results in source identification [8,9,10]. Recent studies have shown that combining stable isotopes with hydrogeochemical parameters is regarded as an effective screening tool to reduce the uncertainties in the sources of NO3 in water [11]. In practice, nitrogen pollution sources are highly complex, influenced by a range of factors including agricultural practices and climatic conditions. The dynamic spatiotemporal variations in these factors further result in significant diversity in the spatial and temporal distribution of water pollutants. This diversity reflects the intricate interactions between anthropogenic sources and environmental drivers underlying nitrogen pollution. Consequently, the integration of multiple approaches has become an essential trend in nitrogen pollution research.
Due to differences in fertilizer types [12], crop types [13] and application amounts [14], changes in land use and farming patterns [15], irrigation methods [16], and other factors related to rainfall [17] also affect the migration and transformation of nitrogen pollution. For example, in the Yiluo River Basin, the concentrations of TN, NO3-N, NH4+-N, and NO2-N are higher in the wet season than in the dry season, and the proportions of various nitrogen sources differ among the upper, middle, and lower reaches during the dry and wet seasons [18]. In the Ru River Basin, the total nitrogen load shows significant seasonal variations, reaching its maximum in summer and minimum in spring [19]. Therefore, sampling strategies should account for hydrological periods, incorporating regional climatic patterns and the timing of agricultural activities. When integrated with multivariate statistical analysis and ArcGIS-based spatial analysis, this approach facilitates the identification of critical periods, key source areas, dominant pollution types, and transmission pathways of nitrogen in polder surface waters. To address the limitations of isotopic overlap in nitrate source identification, this study integrates hydrochemical parameters, multivariate statistical analysis, and spatial mapping. These methods complement isotope tracing by distinguishing pollutant types, revealing temporal-spatial pollution patterns, and improving source apportionment reliability.
The polders around Dongting Lake are important agricultural production areas in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, occupying 69.1% of the water area of Dongting Lake. There are 226 polders of various sizes within the basin. The protected area of the polders is 16,200 km2, and the cultivated area is 6080 km2. As a typical polder in the South Dongting Lake Basin, Quyuan Polder’s land is predominantly used for cultivation, with cultivated land accounting for 58%. It supports diverse agricultural activities, including double-cropping rice cultivation, aquaculture (crayfish and fish), watermelon farming, and tea production. These agricultural activities largely coincide with the high-temperature and heavy rainfall season under the subtropical monsoon climate, during which the annual TN concentrations in polder surface water are 0.82–3.43 mg/L [20]. The water then flows into the lake area through ditches and tributaries. According to the monitoring data up to 2022, the annual average total nitrogen (TN) value of Dongting Lake ranges from 1.21 to 2.38 mg/L. TN levels show significant spatial and temporal variation across different regions of the lake and have emerged as the primary pollutant of concern in Dongting Lake [4].
This study was conducted in the Pingjiang River section of Quyuan Polder in the Dongting Lake Basin. By combining hydrogeochemical indicators, dual isotopes, and statistical methods, we investigated the spatiotemporal migration and sources of nitrogen pollution in the surface water within the polder. Our aims were: (1) To characterize the seasonal variation of nitrogen pollution in polder surface water through targeted sampling during the dry and wet periods; (2) to identify the transport pathways of inorganic nitrogen pollutants by using multivariate statistical analysis of hydrochemical indicators; and (3) to use stable nitrogen and oxygen isotopes to analyze the sources of NO3 during the dry and wet seasons. The research results provide a basic understanding of nitrogen pollution in agricultural areas of lowland catchments and necessary scientific evidence for improving water quality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Pingjiang River, a natural watercourse within Quyuan Polder, is located between 28°51′ to 28°59′ N and from 112°55′ to 112°59′ E. Its catchment covers 74.80 km2, accounting for approximately one-third of the total area of Quyuan Polder. This region lies within the lowest elevation zone of the alluvial-lacustrine plains in northern Hunan Province. The terrain is primarily composed of man-made plains interspersed with low hills and uplands. The highest point is Leishi Mountain, with an altitude of 90.72 m. The lowest point is the bottom of Qiaomai Lake, with an altitude of 22 m. It is a typical lowland catchment area of plain river networks. There are three types of soil-forming parent materials in the region: sandstone metamorphic rock, Quaternary red clay, and river-lake sediments. The region experiences a humid subtropical monsoon climate, with an average annual temperature of 16.9 °C and average annual precipitation of 1406.7 mm. Precipitation is concentrated from April to August, accounting for 62.3% of the annual total. Historically, the highest average rainfall occurs in May, while June experiences the greatest frequency of rainstorms. Since the 1950s, under the combined influence of natural conditions and anthropogenic activities, certain sections of the Pingjiang River have been transformed into ponds or irrigation and drainage ditches. Currently, it mainly receives sewage from three north–south ditches (see Figure 1). Land use types include cultivated land, orchards, forests, grasslands, bare land, and residential areas. The low-lying and gentle terrain of the basin makes cultivated land the dominant land use type, accounting for 58% of the total land area. The region hosts demonstration bases for high-quality rice covering approximately 6.67 km2, as well as for watermelon cultivation and integrated rice-crayfish farming. Except for the integrated rice-crayfish farming mode, all other rice-planting modes are double-cropping rice. Aquaculture is well-developed within the polder, with most ponds used for crayfish farming, lotus root cultivation, and freshwater fish production. Field observations revealed the presence of small-scale poultry farming, such as Muscovy duck breeding, facilitated by abundant water resources. There are no factories or processing enterprises within the study area, so the influence of industrial pollution sources can be excluded. In 2017, black and odorous water bodies appeared within the polder. The test results showed that the degree of blackness and odor of the black and odorous water bodies in the Gutangcha area was severe, and the levels of COD, ammonia nitrogen, and total phosphorus seriously exceeded the Chinese Surface Water Quality Standard (GB3838-2002).

2.2. Field Sampling and Laboratory Analysis

By taking into account different land use patterns, potential pollution sources, and the requirements for spatial distribution uniformity, a total of 13 sample points were selected within the Pingjiang River Basin to represent the surface water in the study area. Among them, 8 sample points (H1–H8) were set on the main channel of the Pingjiang River, 3 sample points (H9–H11) were set at the estuary where the Pingjiang River flows into the lake, and 2 sample points (H12 and H13) were set on the tributary irrigation and drainage ditches. In general, H1–H8, H12, and H13 represent the surface water within the polder, while H9–H11 represent the water bodies outside the polder. Influenced by the monsoon climate, the hydrological characteristics of rivers and lakes in the Dongting Lake area exhibit significant annual differences. The period from April to September and from October to March of the following year represent the wet season and the dry season of Dongting Lake, respectively [21]. To capture interannual variations in river–lake hydrological characteristics and differences in fertilization timing, a total of eight sampling campaigns were conducted during both the wet and dry seasons in 2022 and 2023.
Before sampling, polyethylene bottles were rinsed three times with the target water sample. Samples were stored in a portable refrigerator in the field and transported to the laboratory as soon as possible, then refrigerated at 4 °C. For parameters other than total nitrogen and total phosphorus, samples were filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane. Water quality parameters, including pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, ammonia nitrogen, major ions, and stable isotope ratios (δD, δ18O, δ15N-NO3, δ18O-NO3), were measured using standard laboratory procedures. All analyses were conducted in triplicate to ensure accuracy and reliability. Any missing or outlier data were carefully examined and, if necessary, extrapolated using standard procedures (e.g., exponential smoothing). Detailed QA/QC information, including instrument calibration, detection limits, method precision, and reference standards, is provided in Supplementary Material Table S1.

2.3. Data Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the elemental concentration data. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a 95% confidence level (p < 0.05) was used to evaluate the significant differences in element concentrations between wet and dry seasons. The Spearman coefficient was calculated to quantitatively study the correlations between element concentrations, with a significance level set at p < 0.05 (two-tailed). Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was used to analyze the hydrochemical dataset. HCA identifies statistical similarities among physicochemical parameters to classify samples into distinct groups. For the identified pollutants, correlations among samples from different sampling sites were examined to evaluate similarity levels and intrinsic relationships. This facilitated the identification of primary water pollutants and their transport pathways [22]. In this study, Q-type clustering was applied using SPSS (version 26.0, System Cluster) with the between-groups average linkage method and the squared Euclidean distance metric. The between-groups average linkage was chosen because it defines cluster distances as the mean of all pairwise distances, thereby avoiding chaining and overly compact clusters while emphasizing overall similarity. This approach is particularly suitable for environmental and hydrochemical datasets, where correlated variables reflect hydrological gradients, and it provided spatial groupings consistent with the hydrological connectivity and functional differences in the polder system.
To further identify hotspots and coldspots of nitrogen pollution, spatial interpolation was performed using the Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) method in ArcGIS (version 10.8). Nitrate pollution sources in aquatic environments are complex. Traditional hydrochemical methods utilize the emission data of various pollution sources, the mass concentration of NO3, and the concentration characteristics of other ions to analyze the sources of NO3 pollution in water bodies. Advancements in technology have enabled the widespread application of stable nitrogen and oxygen isotope techniques in environmental pollution research [23,24]. These techniques have proven highly effective in tracing the sources, transport, and transformation of nitrate pollution in aquatic systems [25]. Based on the distinct nitrogen and oxygen isotope signatures associated with different nitrate pollution sources, and in combination with other environmental isotope and chemical analyses, this study quantified the contribution rates of various NO3 sources in surface water, groundwater, and precipitation. Additionally, nitrification and denitrification processes were assessed. Five potential nitrate sources were effectively distinguished: atmospheric deposition (AD), manure, and sewage (M and S), nitrogen fertilizer (NHF), aquaculture, and soil organic nitrogen (SN). Local measurements of δ15N-NO3 and δ18O-NO3 were carried out for the five potential sources of NO3 (Supplementary Materials Table S2) [26,27].

3. Results

3.1. Hydrogeochemical Characterization

The basic physicochemical characteristics of surface water in the study area are shown in Supplementary Materials Table S3. The average pH during both the dry and wet seasons is 7.6, indicating weakly alkaline conditions. Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations range from 1.53 to 14.6 mg/L, with an average of 7.04 mg/L. These values comply with the Chinese Surface Water Quality Standard (GB3838-2002), indicating that the surface water is relatively well oxygenated. The average detected value of TN is 2.48 mg/L during the dry season and 1.89 mg/L during the wet season. According to the Chinese Surface Water Quality Standard (GB3838-2002), the surface water in the study area is classified as Class IV–V water. Compared to the overall water quality of Dongting Lake, which has declined from Class III to Class IV in recent years, previous studies report TN concentrations ranging from 1.15 to 1.70 mg/L in the lake area [4]. Therefore, the TN pollution of the surface water within the polder is more serious. The concentration of total phosphorus (TP) ranges from 0.02 to 0.2 mg/L (with an average value of 0.07 mg/L), which is also higher than the detected range of 0.036–0.128 mg/L in Dongting Lake [4].
The proportion of dissolved inorganic nitrogen in surface water samples (DIN/TN) ranges from 79% to 96%, with an average of 86% (Supplementary Materials Figure S1). These results indicate that dissolved inorganic nitrogen is the predominant form of nitrogen nutrient in the surface water of the study area. In the water samples of the area within the polder, the proportion of nitrate nitrogen in total nitrogen (NO3-N/TN) reaches 57% during the wet season, as shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1, and is lower at 42% during the dry season. In the water samples outside the polder, the measured range of NO3-N/TN reaches 84% during the wet season and 60% during the dry season. The NO3-N/TN in the water samples of the entire basin reaches 50%. Nitrate nitrogen is the dominant form of nitrogen pollution in surface water within the study area, followed by ammonium nitrogen. The nitrogen concentration in surface water varies significantly. By comparing the annual average concentrations of three inorganic nitrogen forms in the surface water, NO3-N is the highest (1.13 mg/L), followed by NH4+-N (0.57 mg/L) and NO2-N (0.08 mg/L). NO3-N concentrations peaked in May 2023, with an average of 2.07 mg/L and a maximum of 2.48 mg/L, and in March 2023, with an average of 1.62 mg/L and a maximum of 2.49 mg/L.

3.2. Water Sample Grouping

Pollutants enter the water body and are gradually transported downstream along the flow direction, undergoing dilution and dispersion. Concurrently, physical and chemical processes—including adsorption, sedimentation, degradation, and transformation—affect pollutant dynamics [22]. The hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) dendrogram (Figure 2a) showed that cutting at four clusters corresponded to the first clear increase in rescaled distance, indicating a natural separation of the sampling sites. The four-cluster partition was also consistent with the hydrological structure of the polder system, separating the upstream reaches, tributary—middle sections, confluence zones, and the outlet segment. This classification highlighted both the statistical distinctness of the groups and their functional differences, which are crucial for interpreting the spatial heterogeneity of hydrochemical characteristics. Moreover, it provided a robust basis for subsequent analysis of nitrogen transport pathways (Section 4.2), as the identified groups reflected the actual connectivity and flow directions within the polder system.
Specifically, the first group consists of sampling points H1–H3 in the upper reaches of the Pingjiang River within the study area, as well as the ditch confluence point H7. The second group includes inlet and outlet points H12 and H13 of the ancient lake wetland, the confluence point H4 of the second tributary, and the terminal point H8 of the Pingjiang River within the study area, covering the middle tributary and lower main channel sections. The third group only contains two ditch confluence points H5 and H6 on the main channel. The fourth group is made up of three sampling points H9, H10, and H11 located at the estuary where the Pingjiang River flows into the lake.
The concentrations of Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, HCO3, Cl, SO42−, TP, TN, NO3-N, NO2-N and NH4+-N in each group of water samples are different (Figure 2b). The average concentrations of TP, TN and NH4+-N in the first group of water samples are higher than those in the other three groups, which are 0.076 mg/L, 2.406 mg/L and 0.794 mg/L, respectively. The sampling points of the first group are mainly located at the junction of farmland irrigation ditches and river chan2nels, as well as in the high-quality rice demonstration bases and watermelon planting bases. Therefore, the high concentration may be related to the application of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer and phosphate fertilizer. The second group has a relatively high load in terms of the indicators of NO2-N (0.106 mg/L), Cl (33.653 mg/L), SO42− (34.953 mg/L), and Na+ (21.738 mg/L). Since H12 and H13 are irrigation and drainage ditches, they converge with the river channel at H4 through tributaries. According to the investigation, the ditches connected to this tributary collect wastewater from lobster aquaculture and farmland. Consequently, nitrite concentrations tend to accumulate and increase in these waters; the third group comprises sampling points located along the main river channel. Water from the first and second groups converges at these points. Following mixing, no significantly elevated concentrations of the measured indicators were observed. The first to the third groups represent the surface water within the polder, while the fourth group is composed of the surface water outside the polder, with relatively high loads of NO3-N (1.438 mg/L) and HCO3 (80.118 mg/L).

3.3. Characteristics of Nitrate Isotopes

The measured δ15N-NO3 and δ18O-NO3 values in surface water are summarized in Supplementary Materials Table S4. During the dry season, δ15N-NO3 ranged from 1.11‰ to 8.45‰ (mean = 4.82‰, SD = 2.54‰), and δ18O-NO3 ranged from 1.41‰ to 11.42‰ (mean = 5.70‰, SD = 2.97‰). In the wet season, δ18O-NO3 ranged from −2.71‰ to 7.09‰ (mean = 3.64‰, SD = 3.15‰), while δ18O-NO3 ranged from 2.38‰ to 9.10‰ (mean = 5.53‰, SD = 1.99‰). The overall values varied within relatively broad ranges in both seasons (Figure 3a,b).
To support qualitative nitrate source identification, the measured isotope values were compared with typical δ15N-NO3 and δ18O-NO3 ranges reported for major nitrogen sources [26,28]. The δ15N-NO3 values of 1–8‰ and δ18O-NO3 values of 2–11‰ observed in most samples generally fall within the overlapping ranges associated with ammonium-based fertilizers, soil organic nitrogen, and manure/sewage. A few negative δ15N-NO3 values (<0‰) appeared in the wet season, which may reflect minor influence from atmospheric deposition or recent fertilizer input. Overall, the isotope composition suggests that nitrate in surface water is likely derived from multiple sources with mixed contributions.

4. Discussion

4.1. Spatiotemporal Changes of Nitrogen in the Study Area

4.1.1. Temporal Variation Characteristics of Nitrogen Pollution in Surface Water

The concentrations of nitrogen species in surface water exhibited noticeable temporal patterns across the sampling periods. In general, TN and NO3-N showed higher concentrations during the dry seasons compared to the wet seasons, while NH4+-N and NO2-N displayed less consistent seasonal trends. Peaks in NH4+-N occurred sporadically, particularly in early wet-season months, indicating episodic inputs or transformation suppression. These variations suggest that hydrological conditions, agricultural schedules, and in situ biogeochemical processes jointly influence nitrogen dynamics over time. Field investigations have found that in the study area, the feeding of fish feed and application of fish fertilizers in fish ponds began in March, and the sowing and seedling raising of cash crops and early rice also started at this time. The fertilization of early rice ended by the end of May. Intensive agricultural activities, combined with increasing precipitation from March to May under the influence of the monsoon climate, and irrigation-related water diversion, facilitated the transport of nitrogen-rich substances from farmland into the basin’s surface water [29]. The peak in NO3-N concentrations suggests that fertilization, irrigation, and subsequent precipitation events may have led to substantial nitrate leaching [30]. NH4+-N concentrations peaked in May 2022, with an average of 0.94 mg/L and a maximum of 2.43 mg/L, while NO3-N levels remained relatively low during the same period (Figure 4c). This may be because the main land use patterns within the polder are paddy fields and ponds. Aquaculture wastewater and livestock and poultry excreta contain compounds with high contents of organic nitrogen such as urea and proteins. In early summer (May), elevated temperatures promote microbial activity, facilitating the degradation of organic nitrogen compounds into NH4+. However, a substantial portion of the resulting ammonium remains in the water column [31]. This pattern may reflect the timing of fertilizer application, but also suggests limited nitrification during this period. According to Supplementary Table S3, the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration was 5.79 ± 2.25 mg/L in the wet season of 2022, with values at some sites approaching the lower threshold (<4 mg/L) for effective nitrification [32]. Under sub-optimal DO conditions, the microbial oxidation of NH4+ to NO3 may be inhibited, leading to NH4+ accumulation and reduced NO3 production. Therefore, both external inputs and in situ biogeochemical processes may have contributed to the observed nitrogen species distribution.
In comparison of two-year sampling data, the concentrations of TN and NO3-N in the second year are generally higher than those in the first year (Figure 4d,f). Zhao et al. reported that 39–43% of applied fertilizer nitrogen is taken up by crops in paddy soils, while approximately 50% is rapidly lost during the growing season, posing considerable risks to environmental safety [33]. The unabsorbed nitrate is prone to leaching or surface runoff, which increases TN concentrations in surrounding water bodies. The increase in annual average concentration indicates that surface water may not be able to recover quickly from nitrogen pollution [34]. Additionally, 2022 experienced a severe drought across the Dongting Lake Basin, whereas precipitation increased significantly in 2023. Greater rainfall in 2023 likely enhanced surface runoff and mobilized nitrogen from agricultural fields into adjacent water bodies. These findings suggest that both residual fertilizer nitrogen and interannual hydrological variability jointly contributed to the observed differences in nitrogen concentrations across years.
Significant differences in total nitrogen (TN) and nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) concentrations were observed between the dry season (February, March, and November) and the wet season (May, June, and August). During the wet season, intensive rainfall promotes NO3 leaching from soil into groundwater and enhances surface runoff. This process can dilute pollutant concentrations in rivers due to the inflow of rainwater [35]. In contrast, during the dry season, the decomposition of aquatic plant residues may contribute to nutrient release into surface waters [36]. Moreover, elevated temperatures during the wet season enhance microbial activity, facilitating the decomposition and microbial assimilation of nitrogen compounds. Moreover, the growth and metabolic activities of phytoplankton will also accelerate the removal of NO3-N, causing the nitrogen concentration in the wet season to be lower than that in the dry season. As shown in Supplementary Table S3, average dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations during the dry season are higher than those in the wet season. Additionally, slower flow rates during the dry season prolong water residence time in river channels. These conditions are favorable for nitrification, thereby increasing NO3-N concentrations in surface water.
A similar seasonal trend has been reported in the Taihu Lake Basin, where polders are widely distributed: total nitrogen (TN) concentrations in surface water tend to be higher in spring and winter, and lower in summer [37]. In the lower reaches of the Mun River Basin in northeastern Thailand, the concentration of NO3 in the dry season is significantly higher than that in the rainy season [38]. This pattern may not only be attributed to dilution by precipitation during the wet season but also to the coincidence of the rainy period with high summer temperatures, which mark the peak of crop growth. During this period, elevated nitrate uptake by crops reduces the amount of nitrate that migrates into surface water [39]. Enhanced biogeochemical activity during the wet season may also promote denitrification, further reducing NO3 concentrations. In contrast, nutrient release from the decomposition of aquatic vegetation during the dry season may contribute to elevated nitrate levels [40]. In addition to source attribution, the isotopic composition of nitrate provides indicative evidence of transformation processes within the aquatic system. The majority of δ15N-NO3 values were below 10‰, suggesting limited denitrification across most sites. However, relatively enriched δ15N-NO3 values (e.g., >7‰) observed in some dry-season samples may imply partial denitrification under suboxic conditions, which is consistent with the lower dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations recorded at several locations (Supplementary Table S3). Conversely, samples exhibiting lower δ15N-NO3 and δ18O-NO3 values likely reflect nitrification from ammonium-based inputs.

4.1.2. Spatial Variation Characteristics of Nitrogen Pollution in Surface Water

The spatial distribution of nitrogen concentration in the surface water at 13 sampling points are shown in Figure 5a–d). During the dry season, when TN concentrations peak, the highest values were observed at H12 and H13, followed by H2 and sites H7 through H11. NO2-N concentrations during the dry season were highest at H5, with elevated values also detected at sites H8 to H11. In the wet season, NH4+-N concentrations peaked at H1 and H3, followed by H2 and H7.
Overall, nitrogen concentrations in surface water exhibited distinct spatial heterogeneity across the study area. During the dry season, TN and NO3-N concentrations displayed similar spatial distribution patterns. The critical source areas are located at sampling points H12, H13, and H2. Field investigations revealed that H12 and H13 correspond to the inlet and outlet of a historical lake wetland, adjacent to which lies an active lobster aquaculture zone. The dry season aligns with key aquaculture activities such as aquatic vegetation planting and the stocking of lobster fry. Wastewater discharge from aquaculture operations is likely the primary contributor to elevated nitrogen levels at these sites. Sample points H2 and H1 are situated in the upstream section of the Pingjiang River, where land use is dominated by agriculture and the river is intersected by multiple artificial irrigation channels. The elevated nitrogen concentrations in this area may be attributed to runoff and return flows from agricultural irrigation [41].
The concentration of NH4+-N shows a similar spatial distribution trend, and the concentration is also higher in the upper half of the river section. This pattern is likely associated with fertilizer application in paddy fields. During the rice season, ammonia volatilization from fertilizer sources accounts for 50.0~93.4% [42]. As for the concentration distribution of NO2-N, sampling point H5 serves as the critical source area. Effluents from lobster aquaculture are discharged into downstream waters via ditches, introducing elevated levels of nitrogen-rich metabolites and increasing the nitrogen burden in the aquatic environment. Improper feeding practices may lead to the accumulation of nitrogenous compounds beyond the assimilation capacity of aquatic microbial communities. The lack of oxygen will affect the nitrification process, preventing nitrite from being smoothly converted into nitrate [43]. This interpretation is further supported by variations in dissolved oxygen (DO) observed during the study period. As shown in Supplementary Table S3, DO concentrations fluctuated seasonally, with several sites showing reduced DO levels (<5 mg/L) during the dry season. Such suboxic conditions are known to limit nitrification and promote partial denitrification, potentially contributing to the observed accumulation of NH4+-N and the relative reduction in NO3-N. Therefore, DO dynamics provide additional evidence supporting the occurrence of redox-sensitive nitrogen transformation processes in the system. Consequently, NO2-N pollution is more pronounced in the downstream segments of the river.
Dongting Lake is hydraulically connected to polder water bodies through a network of ditches and ponds, resulting in reciprocal influences on their aquatic ecological environments [44]. By analyzing nitrogen concentrations in water samples collected during both wet and dry seasons (Supplementary Materials Figure S2), it was found that the average concentrations of TN and NH4+-N in the Pingjiang River section within the polder (H1–H8, H12, H13) were higher than those at the estuarine sites outside the polder (H9–H11), with a statistically significant difference observed in NH4+-N concentrations (p < 0.01). Non-point source pollutants from agricultural activities are transported into internal rivers via surface runoff and drainage channels. For instance, excessive fertilizer application followed by heavy rainfall can mobilize large amounts of nitrogen into the water bodies, increasing concentrations of non-point source pollutants such as TN and NH4+-N in the polder’s river system. These rivers ultimately discharge into the external lake waters. The high assimilative capacity of the Xiangjiang River facilitates pollutant dilution, thereby reducing their concentrations downstream. However, NO3-N concentrations were lower within the polder compared to the external lake sites. This is likely due to the dominant land use types within the polder, namely paddy fields and aquaculture ponds. The ammonium nitrogen fertilizer applied during rice cultivation, as well as the manure excreted by aquatic animals, livestock, and poultry, lead to a relatively high concentration of NH4+-N pollutants in the surface water within the polder. But NO3-N needs to be generated from NH4+-N through the process of nitrification under suitable conditions. As NH4+-N-enriched water is discharged from the polder into the lake, the enhanced availability of ammonium promotes nitrification in the oxygen-rich external waters, resulting in elevated NO3-N concentrations downstream [45].

4.2. Characterization of Nitrogen Pollutant Transmission Paths

Pollutant concentrations at adjacent sampling sites often exhibit varying degrees of internal correlation. For instance, once pollutants enter the water body, they are gradually transported downstream with the flow, undergoing dilution and diffusion processes. Simultaneously, physicochemical processes such as adsorption, sedimentation, degradation, and transformation may occur. In addition, the potential role of biological uptake should not be overlooked [46]. The combined effects of these processes typically result in a gradual reduction in pollutant concentrations over time and space. Alternatively, when pollutant inputs are continuous or intense, enrichment may occur along the downstream flow direction, facilitating pollutant accumulation in lower reaches [47]. This mechanism partly explains the commonly observed pattern of higher pollutant loads in downstream sections compared to upstream areas.
Based on hierarchical cluster analysis and channel connectivity, three primary nitrogen transport pathways were identified within the polder system: Path I (H1 → H2 → H3 → H4), Path II (H12 → H13 → H4 → H5 → H6 → H7 → H8), and Path III (H8 → H9 → H10 → H11), corresponding to upper tributaries, central mixed-flow routes, and downstream discharge outlets, respectively (Figure 6). These pathways reflect the dominant hydrological and land use controlled routes of nitrogen migration across the system.
Path I represents a relatively short upstream tributary pathway. NH4+-N was the dominant nitrogen species at upstream sites (H1–H3), with elevated concentrations likely attributed to localized agricultural inputs and aquaculture discharges (Figure 7). Limited hydraulic exchange and low flow velocity in this region may lead to ammonium accumulation. As water progresses downstream to H4, TN and NH4+-N concentrations decrease gradually, suggesting dilution and potential in-stream transformation (e.g., nitrification). This trend is consistent with previous findings in enclosed lowland systems, where long residence times promote NH4+ buildup and transformation under aerobic conditions [3,5]. Path II is the most complex and hydrologically active pathway, integrating water from aquaculture ponds (H12–H13), main channels (H5–H6), and adjacent agricultural areas. Nitrogen concentrations along this path showed significant variability. At H13 and H7, TN and NH4+-N concentrations peaked, reflecting input from shrimp and lobster farming, as well as fertilizer-rich surface runoff. The appearance of elevated NO3-N concentrations toward H8 suggests active nitrification during downstream transport, likely facilitated by increased dissolved oxygen levels (see Supplementary Table S3) and turbulence in the wider main channel. This aligns with prior studies showing enhanced nitrification in open, well-oxygenated lowland waterways [5]. The mixing of multiple pollution sources along Path II also highlights its vulnerability to diffuse agricultural pressure.
Path III is a downstream export route draining into Dongting Lake. NO3-N concentrations along this path were consistently high, particularly at H10–H11, which are directly influenced by discharge from upstream pathways and surrounding croplands. This suggests that nitrate becomes the dominant nitrogen form exported from the polder system, likely due to upstream nitrification processes. The transition from NH4+-N dominance in upstream/inner regions to NO3-N dominance at the outlet supports the existence of an internal nitrogen conversion continuum. This is further reinforced by spatial isotope evidence (see Section 4.3), indicating ammonium-based fertilizers and soil nitrogen as major sources. This spatial transition from ammonium to nitrate dominance in Path III reflects a typical nitrogen transformation pattern driven by increased oxygen availability and flow connectivity. Similar downstream accumulation of nitrate along extended flow paths has been observed in lowland drainage systems, where prolonged travel times and artificial channel networks facilitate nitrification and nitrate export [48].
In summary, nitrogen migration in the polder system exhibits spatial heterogeneity, shaped by the interaction of land use intensity, water flow connectivity, and biogeochemical conditions. The three identified pathways show functional differentiation: Path I as an input-accumulation section, Path II as a mixed and transitional zone, and Path III as a nitrate-export route. These findings provide a basis for spatially targeted management strategies, such as inlet control, aquaculture discharge regulation, and downstream buffer construction.

4.3. Identifying Nitrate Sources Using Stable Nitrogen and Oxygen Isotope Compositions

Spearman correlation analysis (Figure 8) revealed a significant positive correlation between TN and both NO3-N and NO2-N concentrations in surface water within the polder (p < 0.01). Outside the polder, the temporal variation in TN concentration closely mirrors that of NO3-N, suggesting that changes in nitrate levels largely drive TN dynamics in these regions. Given its stability, strong correlation with TN, and substantial contribution to total nitrogen, NO3-N was selected as the representative nitrogen species for source analysis. Through the study of δ15N-NO3 and δ18O-NO3, the source of nitrogen in water bodies can be effectively analyzed. A significant negative correlation was observed between NH4+-N and NO3-N concentrations within the polder (p < 0.05), possibly reflecting redox-driven transformation processes between these nitrogen species.
As shown in Figure 3, δ15N-NO3 and δ18O-NO3 values during the dry and wet seasons fall into distinct source zones, indicating notable seasonal differences in nitrate sources among sampling points. Compared to the dry season, lower δ15N-NO3 and higher δ18O-NO3 values observed during the wet season may result from the dilution and mixing effects of atmospheric deposition [40].
The four groups shown in Figure 3 were derived from hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) based on nitrogen species concentrations and related water quality variables. Although some intra-group variation is present, the grouping reflects underlying similarities in pollution characteristics. This classification highlights potential functional units within the polder system where nitrogen dynamics share common patterns, and provides a meaningful basis for interpreting differences in nitrogen transport and accumulation. During the wet season, the isotopic composition of nitrate in Group 1 is primarily distributed within the source domain of ammonium-based fertilizers and atmospheric precipitation. In the dry season, δ15N-NO3 values increase and gradually shift toward the isotopic signature of soil-derived nitrogen. Most samples fall within the overlapping source region of ammonium fertilizer, precipitation, and soil nitrogen. During the dry season, ammonium fertilizers are either taken up by crops or immobilized as organic nitrogen in soils. Simultaneously, NH4+-N volatilization leads to isotopic enrichment, increasing δ15N values in the remaining ammonium and its nitrification products [49]. The source of nitrate in the second group is complex. In the wet season, nitrate originates from a mixture of ammonium fertilizer, soil nitrogen, and manure and sewage inputs. The sources remain the same during the dry season, which may be related to lobster aquaculture and paddy field cultivation near the sampling points of the second group. In Group 3, nitrate in the wet season also originates from a mixed source zone comprising ammonium fertilizer, soil nitrogen, and manure and sewage. However, during the dry season, the δ15N ratio decreases to within the range of ammonium fertilizer sources. As shown in Figure 1, the residential areas in rural townships are primarily distributed along the riverbanks. Consequently, during the wet season, sewage and manure from residential areas are more likely to be mobilized by surface runoff and discharged into the receiving water bodies. This phenomenon diminishes during the dry season due to reduced precipitation and surface runoff. The fourth group represents the water body outside the polder. In the wet season, isotopic values in this group cluster within the overlapping zone of soil nitrogen and manure/sewage sources, indicating mixed inputs. In the dry season, nitrate sources include ammonium fertilizers, manure, and sewage, as well as soil nitrogen.
Overall, the isotopic compositions of most surface water samples fall within the characteristic signature ranges of ammonium-based fertilizers and soil nitrogen, indicating that nitrate pollution primarily originates from ammonium fertilizers and soil nitrogen, with additional contributions from manure and sewage. Identifying nitrate sources provides a scientific basis for targeted nitrogen pollution control and ecological restoration, and is essential for protecting water quality and ensuring sustainable water resource management.

5. Conclusions

This study examined the spatiotemporal distribution, transport pathways, and sources of nitrogen pollution in surface waters of a typical polder system in the Dongting Lake basin, using hydrochemical indicators, dual-isotope analysis, and statistical methods. Results showed that NO3-N and NH4+-N were the dominant nitrogen forms, with concentrations higher during the dry season. Spatially, NH4+-N was enriched in inner tributaries, while NO3-N dominated near outlet sections. Three nitrogen transport routes were identified—upstream ammonium accumulation (Path I), mixed forms in confluence zones (Path II), and nitrate-dominated export pathways (Path III)—reflecting in-stream transformation and pollutant convergence. Isotopic evidence pointed to ammonium fertilizers and soil nitrogen as the main nitrate sources, with localized inputs from manure and sewage. These patterns reflected differences in land use and nitrogen transformation. The findings underscore the need for targeted management strategies, such as optimized fertilizer use, aquaculture effluent regulation, and buffer zones near outlets, tailored to the identified transport and source patterns.
Despite offering new insights, this study is limited by the lack of continuous temporal and hydrological data. Future research should incorporate high-frequency monitoring and coupled isotope–hydrodynamic modeling to support refined nitrogen management in complex lowland agricultural systems.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/w17172601/s1, Figure S1: The proportion of DIN inside and outside embankments in different hydrological; Figure S2: Differences in TN, NO3-N, NH4+-N, and NO2-N concentrations between surface waters inside the polders and Outside the polder; Table S1. Summary of QA/QC information for laboratory analyses; Table S2: Average values of δ15N-NO3 and δ18O-NO3 corresponding to different sources; Table S3: Riverine physicochemical indicators for different season; Table S4: Isotope data of surface water.

Author Contributions

Y.L. (Yalan Luo): visualization, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. B.P.: investigation, resources, validation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. T.L.: data curation. M.C.: formal analysis. Y.G.: investigation. Y.L. (Yaojun Liu): resources, validation, supervision, funding acquisition. X.N.: supervision, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Key Program of Research and Development of Hunan Province, China (2023NK2029); the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2023JJ40442); Jiangxi Water Conservancy Science and Technology Major Project, China (202224ZDKT12); the National Students’ Platform for Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (S202310542068).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Chen, X.; Strokal, M.; Kroeze, C.; Supit, I.; Wang, M.; Ma, L.; Chen, X.; Shi, X. Modeling the Contribution of Crops to Nitrogen Pollution in the Yangtze River. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 11929–11939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, J.; Gao, J.; Yan, R. A Phosphorus Dynamic model for lowland Polder systems (PDP). Ecol. Eng. 2016, 88, 242–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. van der Grift, B.; Broers, H.P.; Berendrecht, W.; Rozemeijer, J.; Osté, L.; Griffioen, J. High-Frequency Monitoring Reveals Nutrient Sources and Transport Processes in an Agriculture-Dominated Lowland Water System. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2016, 20, 1851–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Geng, M.; Wang, K.; Yang, N.; Li, F.; Zou, Y.; Chen, X.; Deng, Z.; Xie, Y. Spatiotemporal Water Quality Variations and Their Relationship with Hydrological Conditions in Dongting Lake after the Operation of the Three Gorges Dam, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 283, 124644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, J.; Arhonditsis, G.B.; Gao, J.; Kim, D.-K.; Dong, F. Towards the Development of a Modeling Framework to Track Nitrogen Export from Lowland Artificial Watersheds (Polders). Water Res. 2018, 133, 319–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Qiu, J.; Shen, Z.; Chen, L.; Hou, X. Quantifying Effects of Conservation Practices on Non-Point Source Pollution in the Miyun Reservoir Watershed, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kim, S.-H.; Lee, D.-H.; Kim, M.-S.; Rhee, H.-P.; Hur, J.; Shin, K.-H. Systematic Tracing of Nitrate Sources in a Complex River Catchment: An Integrated Approach Using Stable Isotopes and Hydrological Models. Water Res. 2023, 235, 119755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Minet, E.P.; Goodhue, R.; Meier-Augenstein, W.; Kalin, R.M.; Fenton, O.; Richards, K.G.; Coxon, C.E. Combining Stable Isotopes with Contamination Indicators: A Method for Improved Investigation of Nitrate Sources and Dynamics in Aquifers with Mixed Nitrogen Inputs. Water Res. 2017, 124, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Xue, D.; De Baets, B.; Van Cleemput, O.; Hennessy, C.; Berglund, M.; Boeckx, P. Use of a Bayesian Isotope Mixing Model to Estimate Proportional Contributions of Multiple Nitrate Sources in Surface Water. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 161, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, A.; Chen, J.; Gao, L.; Shimizu, Y.; Liang, D.; Yi, M.; Cao, L. Combined Microbial and Isotopic Signature Approach to Identify Nitrate Sources and Transformation Processes in Groundwater. Chemosphere 2019, 228, 721–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kelepertzis, E.; Matiatos, I.; Botsou, F.; Antonopoulou, C.; Lappas, I.; Dotsika, E.; Chrastný, V.; Boeckx, P.; Karavoltsos, S.; Komárek, M. Assessment of Natural and Anthropogenic Contamination Sources in a Mediterranean Aquifer by Combining Hydrochemical and Stable Isotope Techniques. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 858, 159763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bah, H.; Zhou, M.; Ren, X.; Hu, L.; Dong, Z.; Zhu, B. Effects of Organic Amendment Applications on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses from Sloping Cropland in the Upper Yangtze River. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 302, 107086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Carver, R.E.; Nelson, N.O.; Roozeboom, K.L.; Kluitenberg, G.J.; Tomlinson, P.J.; Kang, Q.; Abel, D.S. Cover Crop and Phosphorus Fertilizer Management Impacts on Surface Water Quality from a No-till Corn-Soybean Rotation. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 301, 113818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hanrahan, B.R.; King, K.W.; Williams, M.R.; Duncan, E.W.; Pease, L.A. LaBarge Nutrient Balances Influence Hydrologic Losses of Nitrogen and Phosphorus across Agricultural Fields in Northwestern Ohio. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 2019, 113, 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Simpson, I.M.; Winston, R.J.; Dorsey, J.D. Monitoring the Effects of Urban and Forested Land Uses on Runoff Quality: Implications for Improved Stormwater Management. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 862, 160827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gray, C.W.; McDowell, R.W.; Carrick, S.; Thomas, S. The Effect of Irrigation and Urine Application on Phosphorus Losses to Subsurface Flow from a Stony Soil. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 233, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yue, F.-J.; Li, S.-L.; Waldron, S.; Oliver, D.M.; Chen, X.; Li, P.; Peng, T.; Liu, C.-Q. Source Availability and Hydrological Connectivity Determined Nitrate-Discharge Relationships during Rainfall Events in Karst Catchment as Revealed by High-Frequency Nitrate Sensing. Water Res. 2023, 231, 119616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, X.; Xu, Y.J.; Zhang, L. Watershed Scale Spatiotemporal Nitrogen Transport and Source Tracing Using Dual Isotopes among Surface Water, Sediments and Groundwater in the Yiluo River Watershed, Middle of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 833, 155180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, X.; Liu, Q.; Fu, G.; He, Y.; Luo, X.; Zheng, Z. Spatiotemporal Patterns and Source Attribution of Nitrogen Load in a River Basin with Complex Pollution Sources. Water Res. 2016, 94, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tian, L.; Nie, X.; Peng, B.; Li, Z. Identification of Nitrate Source of Surface Water in Polders by Nitrogen and Oxygen Isotopes. Res. Environ. Sci. 2024, 37, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Geng, M.; Wang, K.; Yang, N.; Qian, Z.; Li, F.; Zou, Y.; Chen, X.; Deng, Z.; Xie, Y. Is Water Quality Better in Wet Years or Dry Years in River-Connected Lakes? A Case Study from Dongting Lake, China. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 290, 118115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yu, M.; Su, H.; Li, M.; Wu, X.; Zhang, K.; Ma, P.; Ma, Y.; Hu, G. Analysis of recognition and transmission path for organic nitrogen and phosphorus pollutants in representative cities section of lower Yangtze River. China Environ. Sci. 2023, 43, 3604–3615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, Z.; Zhang, M.; Chen, Y.; Ti, C.; Tian, J.; He, X.; Yu, K.; Zhu, W.; Yan, X.; Wang, Y. Traceability of Nitrate Polluted Hotspots in Plain River Networks of the Yangtze River Delta by Nitrogen and Oxygen Isotopes Coupling Bayesian Model. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 315, 120438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Onodera, T.; Komatsu, K.; Kohzu, A.; Kanaya, G.; Mizuochi, M.; Syutsubo, K. Evaluation of Stable Isotope Ratios (δ15N and δ18O) of Nitrate in Advanced Sewage Treatment Processes: Isotopic Signature in Four Process Types. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 762, 144120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Y.; Cao, X.; Yu, H.; Xu, Y.; Peng, J.; Qu, J. Nitrate with Enriched Heavy Oxygen Isotope Linked to Changes in Nitrogen Source and Transformation as Groundwater Table Rises. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 455, 131527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Yu, G.; Sun, X.; Wen, X. Review of Dual Stable Isotope Technique for Nitrate Source Identification in Surface- and Groundwater in China. Environ. Sci. 2014, 35, 3230–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, N.; Dong, H.; Lu, T.; Yan, X.; Yu, D.; Huang, X. Tracking nitrogen pollutants in Xiamen coastal river via multiple techniques and strategy of water quality management. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae 2017, 37, 2031–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ye, K.; Meng, F.; Zhang, L.; Yao, Z.; Xue, H.; Cheng, P.; Zhang, D. Spatial-Temporal Variation Characteristics and Source Analysis of Nitrogen Pollution in the Songhua River Basin. Res. Environ. Sci. 2020, 33, 901–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ho, C.-C.; Shih, P.-C.; Chiang, L.-C.; Lin, Y.-X.; Liu, H.-F.; Chang, W.-G.; Lin, G.-Z. Mitigating Non-Point Source Pollution in Tea Plantations: SWAT Modeling and Field Validation of Slow-Release Fertilizers. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2025, 197, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, X.; Miao, P.; Zhu, H.; Li, W.; Liang, X.; Wang, L.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, J. Extreme Precipitation Accelerates Nitrate Leaching in the Intensive Agricultural Region with Thick Unsaturated Zones. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 918, 170789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, X.; Peng, H. Research progress of dissolved organie nitrogen in groundwater. Environ. Pollut. Control 2021, 43, 1590–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nikolenko, O.; Jurado, A.; Borges, A.V.; Knöller, K.; Brouyère, S. Isotopic Composition of Nitrogen Species in Groundwater under Agricultural Areas: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 621, 1415–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, X.; Wang, Y.; Cai, S.; Ladha, J.K.; Castellano, M.J.; Xia, L.; Xie, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Gu, B.; Xing, G.; et al. Legacy Nitrogen Fertilizer in a Rice-Wheat Cropping System Flows to Crops More than the Environment. Sci. Bull. 2024, 69, 1212–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, C.; Huang, C.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.; Li, T.; Peng, J.; Zhang, L. Research Progress on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loss in Small Watersheds: A Regional Review. Water 2023, 15, 2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ding, J.; Xi, B.; Gao, R.; He, L.; Liu, H.; Dai, X.; Yu, Y. Identifying Diffused Nitrate Sources in a Stream in an Agricultural Field Using a Dual Isotopic Approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 484, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Correll, D.L.; Jordan, T.E.; Weller, D.E. Transport of Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Rhode River Watersheds during Storm Events. Water Resour. Res. 1999, 35, 2513–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lu, H.; Yang, L.; Fan, Y.; Qian, X.; Liu, T. Novel Simulation of Aqueous Total Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentrations in Taihu Lake with Machine Learning. Environ. Res. 2022, 204, 111940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Liu, X.-L.; Han, G.; Zeng, J.; Liu, M.; Li, X.-Q.; Boeckx, P. Identifying the Sources of Nitrate Contamination Using a Combined Dual Isotope, Chemical and Bayesian Model Approach in a Tropical Agricultural River: Case Study in the Mun River, Thailand. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 760, 143938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, Y.; Lee, D.; Ding, J.; Lu, J. Environmental Impact of High Concentration Nitrate Migration in Soil System Using HYDRUS Simulation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guo, Z.; Yan, C.; Wang, Z.; Xu, F.; Yang, F. Quantitative Identification of Nitrate Sources in a Coastal Peri-Urban Watershed Using Hydrogeochemical Indicators and Dual Isotopes Together with the Statistical Approaches. Chemosphere 2020, 243, 125364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dębska, K.; Rutkowska, B.; Szulc, W. Influence of the Catchment Area Use on the Water Quality in the Utrata River. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2022, 194, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhao, X.; Yan, X.; Xie, Y.; Wang, S.; Xing, G.; Zhu, Z. Use of Nitrogen Isotope To Determine Fertilizer- and Soil-Derived Ammonia Volatilization in a Rice/Wheat Rotation System. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 3017–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zheng, T.; Wang, P.; Hu, B.; Bao, T.; Qin, X. Mass Variations and Transfer Process of Shrimp Farming Pollutants in Aquaculture Drainage Systems: Effects of DOM Features and Physicochemical Properties. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 469, 133978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, Z.; Lu, X.; Han, X.; Wang, L.; Tang, X.; Lin, X. Quantitative Morphology of Polder Landscape Based on SOM Identification Model: Case Study of Typical Polders in the South of Yangtze River. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 2022, 1362272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Khalil, K.; Mary, B.; Renault, P. Nitrous Oxide Production by Nitrification and Denitrification in Soil Aggregates as Affected by O2 Concentration. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2004, 36, 687–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Farahbod, F. Mathematical Investigation of Diffusion and Decomposition of Pollutants as a Basic Issue in Water Stream Pollution. Arab. J. Geosci. 2020, 13, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, H.; Ma, X.; Zhou, B.; Ren, G.; Yuan, D.; Liu, H.; Wei, Z.; Gu, X.; Zhao, B.; Hu, Y.; et al. An Integrated Migration and Transformation Model to Evaluate the Occurrence Characteristics and Environmental Risks of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Constructed Wetland. Chemosphere 2021, 277, 130219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Van Der Velde, Y.; De Rooij, G.H.; Rozemeijer, J.C.; Van Geer, F.C.; Broers, H.P. Nitrate Response of a Lowland Catchment: On the Relation between Stream Concentration and Travel Time Distribution Dynamics. Water Resour. Res. 2010, 46, 2010WR009105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, L.; Han, J.; Xue, J.; Zeng, L.; Shi, J.; Wu, L.; Jiang, Y. Nitrate Source Apportionment in a Subtropical Watershed Using Bayesian Model. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 463–464, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of land use types and sampling points in the study area.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of land use types and sampling points in the study area.
Water 17 02601 g001
Figure 2. (a) Dendrogram classifying surface water samples based on hydrochemistry data. (b) Radar chart of water quality indicator load for each group.
Figure 2. (a) Dendrogram classifying surface water samples based on hydrochemistry data. (b) Radar chart of water quality indicator load for each group.
Water 17 02601 g002
Figure 3. Source plots for the dual nitrate isotopes (δ15N versus δ18O) in water samples collected from river water of Pingjiang River during the study period (a) dry season (b) wet season. The dashed lined boxes indicate typical ranges in isotopic signatures for various sources according to [26].
Figure 3. Source plots for the dual nitrate isotopes (δ15N versus δ18O) in water samples collected from river water of Pingjiang River during the study period (a) dry season (b) wet season. The dashed lined boxes indicate typical ranges in isotopic signatures for various sources according to [26].
Water 17 02601 g003
Figure 4. Temporal variations in concentrations of (a) monthly TN, (b) monthly NO3-N, (c) monthly NH4+-N, (d) annual NO2-N, (e) annual mean concentration, and (f) dry and wet period concentration in surface water. * above the error bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the different years (***: p < 0.001, highly significant difference; *: p < 0.05, statistically significant difference).
Figure 4. Temporal variations in concentrations of (a) monthly TN, (b) monthly NO3-N, (c) monthly NH4+-N, (d) annual NO2-N, (e) annual mean concentration, and (f) dry and wet period concentration in surface water. * above the error bars indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the different years (***: p < 0.001, highly significant difference; *: p < 0.05, statistically significant difference).
Water 17 02601 g004
Figure 5. Spatial distribution of concentrations of (a) TN, (b) NO3-N, (c) NH4+-N, and (d) NO2-N in surface water.
Figure 5. Spatial distribution of concentrations of (a) TN, (b) NO3-N, (c) NH4+-N, and (d) NO2-N in surface water.
Water 17 02601 g005
Figure 6. (a) Cluster diagram of sample points. (b) Schematic diagram of nitrogen pollutant transmission path.
Figure 6. (a) Cluster diagram of sample points. (b) Schematic diagram of nitrogen pollutant transmission path.
Water 17 02601 g006
Figure 7. Variations in nitrogen concentrations along different flow paths.
Figure 7. Variations in nitrogen concentrations along different flow paths.
Water 17 02601 g007
Figure 8. Hot spot correlation map of soluble inorganic nitrogen (a) within the polder (b) outside the polder (**: p < 0.01, significant difference; ***: p < 0.001, highly significant difference).
Figure 8. Hot spot correlation map of soluble inorganic nitrogen (a) within the polder (b) outside the polder (**: p < 0.01, significant difference; ***: p < 0.001, highly significant difference).
Water 17 02601 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, Y.; Peng, B.; Li, T.; Chang, M.; Guo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Nie, X. Agricultural Activities and Hydrological Processes Drive Nitrogen Pollution and Transport in Polder Waters: Evidence from Hydrochemical and Isotopic Analysis. Water 2025, 17, 2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172601

AMA Style

Luo Y, Peng B, Li T, Chang M, Guo Y, Liu Y, Nie X. Agricultural Activities and Hydrological Processes Drive Nitrogen Pollution and Transport in Polder Waters: Evidence from Hydrochemical and Isotopic Analysis. Water. 2025; 17(17):2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172601

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Yalan, Bo Peng, Tingting Li, Mengmeng Chang, Yinghui Guo, Yaojun Liu, and Xiaodong Nie. 2025. "Agricultural Activities and Hydrological Processes Drive Nitrogen Pollution and Transport in Polder Waters: Evidence from Hydrochemical and Isotopic Analysis" Water 17, no. 17: 2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172601

APA Style

Luo, Y., Peng, B., Li, T., Chang, M., Guo, Y., Liu, Y., & Nie, X. (2025). Agricultural Activities and Hydrological Processes Drive Nitrogen Pollution and Transport in Polder Waters: Evidence from Hydrochemical and Isotopic Analysis. Water, 17(17), 2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172601

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop