Next Article in Journal
The Significance of Vertical and Lateral Groundwater–Surface Water Exchange Fluxes in Riverbeds and Riverbanks: Comparing 1D Analytical Flux Estimates with 3D Groundwater Modelling
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of the Evolution of Marine Industry Structure on the Green Total Factor Productivity of Marine Economy
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainability Assessment of White Shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) Production in Super-Intensive System in the Municipality of San Blas, Nayarit, Mexico
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fishery-Based Ecotourism in Developing Countries Can Enhance the Social-Ecological Resilience of Coastal Fishers—A Case Study of Bangladesh
Review

Blue Water Visitor Monitoring Potential: A Literature Review and Alternative Proposal

1
School of Natural Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
2
NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
3
Lynker Technologies, LLC & NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
4
Ponta Grossa State University, Ponta Grossa 84010-330, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Salvador García-Ayllón Veintimilla
Water 2021, 13(3), 305; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030305
Received: 5 January 2021 / Revised: 21 January 2021 / Accepted: 23 January 2021 / Published: 27 January 2021
This review presents a summary of existing visitor monitoring methods and relevant studies in land and marine-based areas, with a focus on the application to unique aquatic settings. Various opportunities and challenges exist with respect to the use of each method in different marine settings. These methods differ in terms of the complexity, costs, level of accuracy, and detailed information they provide. Furthermore, the feasibility of applying these methods also depends on the site attributes of a marine area. Since each marine area varies in geographical scale and environmental and social conditions, some methods will be more appropriate or perform more successfully than others in a particular location. Therefore, the consideration of these methods should be part of a proposed alternative process, focused on adaptive monitoring that scales to address visitor ebbs and flows in these aquatic areas. The proposed alternative seeks to develop consensus around quantitative goals for visitor monitoring and estimating techniques in marine settings, using a customizable mix of methods and techniques. This alternative effort progresses to subsequent tasks and discussions, and recommendations are made considering the feasibility and confidence of using these methods in particular marine settings and future pilot sites. View Full-Text
Keywords: visitor monitoring; marine protected areas; adaptive management; mixed methods; site-specific planning visitor monitoring; marine protected areas; adaptive management; mixed methods; site-specific planning
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Andrew, R.G.; Burns, R.C.; Schwarzmann, D.; Allen, M.E.; Moreira, J.C. Blue Water Visitor Monitoring Potential: A Literature Review and Alternative Proposal. Water 2021, 13, 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030305

AMA Style

Andrew RG, Burns RC, Schwarzmann D, Allen ME, Moreira JC. Blue Water Visitor Monitoring Potential: A Literature Review and Alternative Proposal. Water. 2021; 13(3):305. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030305

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andrew, Ross G., Robert C. Burns, Danielle Schwarzmann, Mary E. Allen, and Jasmine C. Moreira. 2021. "Blue Water Visitor Monitoring Potential: A Literature Review and Alternative Proposal" Water 13, no. 3: 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030305

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop