Next Article in Journal
Analysis of 220 Years of Floodplain Population Dynamics in the US at Different Spatial Scales
Previous Article in Journal
Deterministic Analysis and Uncertainty Analysis of Ensemble Forecasting Model Based on Variational Mode Decomposition for Estimation of Monthly Groundwater Level
Open AccessReview

Why People (Do Not) Adopt the Private Precautionary and Mitigation Measures: A Review of the Issue from the Perspective of Recent Flood Risk Research

1
Department of Environmental Geography, Institute of Geonics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Drobného 28, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
2
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 1, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia
Water 2021, 13(2), 140; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020140
Received: 16 November 2020 / Revised: 5 January 2021 / Accepted: 5 January 2021 / Published: 9 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrology and Hydrogeology)
Based on the literature review, this paper synthesizes recent state of knowledge on flood risk perception and related human behaviors. The main attention is paid to private precautionary and mitigation measures, and the reasons why these are (not) adopted by agents such as individual households. Results of a wide range of relevant studies are presented and critically examined. The findings are presented within an interpretive framework established during the review process; six key themes (responsibility, risk perception, people and social environment, geography of risk, emotions, theories and conceptual models) and several sub-themes closely related to them were identified by the content/thematic analysis. These were then utilized to overview and discuss particular factors and issues involved, as well as various relevant theoretical underpinnings and conceptual models. The review identifies, illustrates, and addresses not only the consensual views and contradictory findings of flood risk research, but also several related and essential ambiguities, uncertainties, and knowledge gaps. Based on these findings, suggestions for future research are discussed, including the terminological, semantic, methodological, theoretical, and ethical aspects. The paper thus serves two main tasks: (a) It is a useful reference/departure point for those with research interests in topics and issues such as flood risk perception, flood risk protective and mitigation behaviors and measures, or flood risk management in general; and (b) it provides suggestions and incentives for future flood risk research agenda. View Full-Text
Keywords: floods; flood risk management; mitigation measures; households; behavior; factors; responsibility; risk perception; experience; emotions; theory; flood risk research floods; flood risk management; mitigation measures; households; behavior; factors; responsibility; risk perception; experience; emotions; theory; flood risk research
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Andráško, I. Why People (Do Not) Adopt the Private Precautionary and Mitigation Measures: A Review of the Issue from the Perspective of Recent Flood Risk Research. Water 2021, 13, 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020140

AMA Style

Andráško I. Why People (Do Not) Adopt the Private Precautionary and Mitigation Measures: A Review of the Issue from the Perspective of Recent Flood Risk Research. Water. 2021; 13(2):140. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020140

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andráško, Ivan. 2021. "Why People (Do Not) Adopt the Private Precautionary and Mitigation Measures: A Review of the Issue from the Perspective of Recent Flood Risk Research" Water 13, no. 2: 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020140

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop