Next Article in Journal
Multifractal Analysis of River Networks under the Background of Urbanization in the Yellow River Basin, China
Previous Article in Journal
Unexpected Diversity of Feeding Modes among Chisel-Mouthed Ethiopian Labeobarbus (Cyprinidae)
Article

A Systematic Analysis of the Interaction between Rain-on-Grid-Simulations and Spatial Resolution in 2D Hydrodynamic Modeling

Chair of Engineering Hydrology and Water Management, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Thomas Meixner
Water 2021, 13(17), 2346; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13172346
Received: 4 August 2021 / Revised: 19 August 2021 / Accepted: 21 August 2021 / Published: 26 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrology)
A large number of 2D models were originally developed as 1D models for the calculation of water levels along the main course of a river. Due to their development as 2D distributed models, the majority have added precipitation as a source term. The models can now be used as quasi-2D hydrodynamic rainfall–runoff models (‘HDRRM’). Within the direct rainfall method (‘DRM’), there is an approach, referred to as ‘rain-on-grid’, in which input precipitation is applied to the entire catchment area. The study contains a systematic analysis of the model behavior of HEC-RAS (‘Hydrologic Engineering Center—River Analysis System’) with a special focus on spatial resolution. The rain-on-grid approach is applied in a small, ungauged, low-mountain-range study area (Messbach catchment, 2.13 km2) in Central Germany. Suitable model settings and recommendations on model discretization and parametrization are derived therefrom. The sensitivity analysis focuses on the influence of the mesh resolution’s interaction with the spatial resolution of the underlying terrain model (‘subgrid’). Furthermore, the sensitivity of the parameters interplaying with spatial resolution, like the height of the laminar depth, surface roughness, model specific filter-settings and the precipitation input-data temporal distribution, is analyzed. The results are evaluated against a high-resolution benchmark run, and further criteria, such as 1. Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, 2. water-surface elevation, 3. flooded area, 4. volume deficit, 5. volume balance and 6. computational time. The investigation showed that, based on the chosen criteria for this size and type of catchment, a mesh resolution between 3 m to 5 m, in combination with a DEM resolution from 0.25 m to 1 m, are recommendable. Furthermore, we show considerable scale effects on flooded areas for coarser meshing, due to low water levels in relation to topographic height. View Full-Text
Keywords: hydrodynamic modeling; hydrological modeling; storm hazard analysis; Direct Rainfall Method; rain-on-grid; sensitivity analysis; overland flow; spatial resolution hydrodynamic modeling; hydrological modeling; storm hazard analysis; Direct Rainfall Method; rain-on-grid; sensitivity analysis; overland flow; spatial resolution
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

David, A.; Schmalz, B. A Systematic Analysis of the Interaction between Rain-on-Grid-Simulations and Spatial Resolution in 2D Hydrodynamic Modeling. Water 2021, 13, 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13172346

AMA Style

David A, Schmalz B. A Systematic Analysis of the Interaction between Rain-on-Grid-Simulations and Spatial Resolution in 2D Hydrodynamic Modeling. Water. 2021; 13(17):2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13172346

Chicago/Turabian Style

David, Amrei, and Britta Schmalz. 2021. "A Systematic Analysis of the Interaction between Rain-on-Grid-Simulations and Spatial Resolution in 2D Hydrodynamic Modeling" Water 13, no. 17: 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13172346

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop