Identiﬁcation of Extreme Weather Events Using Meteorological and Hydrological Indicators in the Laborec River Catchment, Slovakia

: This study used the standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the standardized runoff index (SRI) to analyze dry and humid conditions in the hill-country catchment area of the Laborec River (Slovakia) over a period of 50 years (1970–2019). Analysis of the SPI and SRI over various time scales showed the occurrence of wet periods (index > 1.0) that were associated with precipitation exceeding the long-term norm, and dry periods (index below − 1.0), which were the result of small amounts of precipitation. Analysis of the correlation between the SPI and SRI on different time scales revealed that the catchment showed a weaker response to precipitation over short time scales (1 and 3 months) and a stronger response over longer accumulation periods (6, 9, and 12 months). The highest annual correlation coefﬁcient (r = 0.72) was recorded between SRI-6 at the Humenne hydrometric station and SPI-9 at the Medzilaborce meteorological station in the upper part of the catchment area. The strongest annual correlation (r = 0.69) was obtained between the Izkovce and Kamenica stations in the lower part of the catchment area. As shown by the cross-relationships examined over different periods of accumulation of ﬂows and precipitation, hydrological droughts appeared as a result of the occurrence of meteorological droughts with a three-month delay. The conducted analysis showed that in the case of the Laborec river catchment area, there was a strong correlation between the occurrence of meteorological drought and hydrological drought.


Introduction
Extreme climatic events and their effects on the natural and social environment have become the most frequently discussed research problem in recent years. This is largely related to the serious impact of these phenomena on the functioning of people and the environment [1 -3]. Europe has experienced numerous floods and droughts in recent years as a result of excesses and shortages of precipitation, contributing to significant economic losses. Between 1980 and 2019, extreme weather and climate events accounted for around 81% of the total economic loss due to natural hazards in the European Environment Agency member countries, amounting to EUR 446 billion, with the most expensive extreme climatic events being floods and droughts [4]. Moreover, the latest projections related to climate change predicted that the frequency of these events will increase significantly on Water 2021, 13, 1413 2 of 20 a global scale [5]. The problem of climate change and its hydrological consequences is characterized by extreme complexity (spatial and temporal) and the use of many different definitions, methodologies, models, and tools, leading to a heterogeneous view of the changes. More and more research is focused on the integration of meteorological and hydrological indicators, which allows for the variability of river runoff to be determined under the influence of climatic variability [6][7][8]. The application of universal indicators, which are used to establish a comprehensive information system on the hydrological regime of rivers in combination with climatic conditions will enable a better understanding of the scale of the changes, taking into account local conditions of the water cycle and comparing them from a regional perspective. These universal indicators include standardized indices for meteorological indicators that have been adapted to assess hydrological conditions. The adopted indicators have been used to identify periods with an excess or shortage of water within specific catchment areas to determine their intensity and forecast changes in the future [9,10]. Studies on the relationship between meteorological and hydrological indicators have been widely used in various areas [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Many comparative analyses have been carried out that focused on linking drought indicators to the types of drought to enable a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between different types of drought [7,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26].
The analysis of meteorological conditions using various standardized meteorological indicators has been performed for Slovakia [27,28]. Research on the relationship between meteorological and hydrological conditions using standardized meteorological and hydrological indicators in selected catchments in Slovakia was conducted by different researchers [29][30][31]. The course and intensity of meteorological phenomena and their impact on hydrological conditions in the catchment areas of Slovak rivers vary in nature. Despite the fact that on the scale of the whole European continent, the changes are invisible, from the point of view of local conditions, they have a decisive impact on the water resources of a given region. A particularly important issue is the identification and course of floods and droughts in both agricultural and urbanized areas. Knowledge of the course of extreme events within a given region contributes to a better understanding of the problem, as well as effective management of water resources and implementation of actions to adapt to the forecasted effects of climate change [32,33].
This research was devoted to the use of standardized indicators-the standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the standardized flow index (SRI)-to calculate the frequency of dry and wet periods in the Laborec river catchment, Slovakia, during the period from 1970 to 2019.

Study Area
The study focused on the Laborec River catchment area in eastern Slovakia. The Laborec is a tributary of the Bodrog River. It is a hill-country river that is 129 km long. The catchment area is 4522 km 2 . The terrain elevation is 580 m a.s.l., while the average elevation is at 675.5 m a.s.l. The most important tributaries of the Laborec include the Cirocha and Uh rivers. The Cirocha drains the northeastern part of the catchment area and flows into the Laborec above the Humenne station. The Uh flows into the Laborec in its lower reaches. The length of this river is 126.5 km, 105.3 km of which is in Ukraine and 21.3 km is in Slovakia. About 61% of the Uh catchment area is located in Ukraine and 39% is in Slovakia. Figure 1 shows the location map of the study area.
Over 48% of the Laborec catchment is covered in forests. Urban areas within the catchment constitute only a small share of the area: 4.33% consists of compact and loose urbanized areas, whereas agricultural land accounts for about 33.3% (Corine Land Cover).

Data and Methods
To characterize the meteorological conditions, precipitation data were used from three meteorological stations: Kamenica nad Cirochou, Medzilaborce, and Michalovce. The hydrological conditions were examined based on the volume of the Laborec river flows at two hydrological stations: Humenne and Izkovce ( Figure 1). The data came from the Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMI) in Bratislava, which is responsible for the quality control, homogenization, and data preparation for the end user according to World Health Organization (WHO) standards. The data analysis was carried out in relation to the hydrological year, which in Slovakia lasts from 1 November to 31 October of the following year. Based on the daily values, monthly and annual mean values for the period 1970-2019 were calculated. The data were statistically analyzed with regard to the determination of data homogeneity and trend detection.
In order to identify extreme events, two indicators were used: standardized precipitation index (SPI) and standardized runoff index (SRI). The SPI was developed by McKee et al. [34] to assess meteorological drought and has been used by many authors [35][36][37]. The SRI was developed on the basis of the SPI concept for the characteristics of hydrological drought [38][39][40][41][42]. The calculations of the indicators were made according to the following formula:

Data and Methods
To characterize the meteorological conditions, precipitation data were used from three meteorological stations: Kamenica nad Cirochou, Medzilaborce, and Michalovce. The hydrological conditions were examined based on the volume of the Laborec river flows at two hydrological stations: Humenne and Izkovce ( Figure 1). The data came from the Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMI) in Bratislava, which is responsible for the quality control, homogenization, and data preparation for the end user according to World Health Organization (WHO) standards. The data analysis was carried out in relation to the hydrological year, which in Slovakia lasts from 1 November to 31 October of the following year. Based on the daily values, monthly and annual mean values for the period 1970-2019 were calculated. The data were statistically analyzed with regard to the determination of data homogeneity and trend detection.
In order to identify extreme events, two indicators were used: standardized precipitation index (SPI) and standardized runoff index (SRI). The SPI was developed by Mc-Kee et al. [34] to assess meteorological drought and has been used by many authors [35][36][37]. The SRI was developed on the basis of the SPI concept for the characteristics of hydrological drought [38][39][40][41][42]. The calculations of the indicators were made according to the following formula: where Z-chosen index (SPI or SRI, where P-precipitation and R-runoff), f(X)-transformed sums of precipitation (P) and runoff (R),μ-mean of normalized X, andδ-standard deviation of the normalized X.
The values of the SPI and SRI are the standard deviation of precipitation and flows from the median value in the multi-year period. In the study, matching the normal distributions of homogenous series of precipitation P-1 was achieved with the use of the transformation function f(P) = 3 √ P [43]. In the case of calculating SRI-1, for the purposes of the normalization function, a two-parameter logarithmic function was used [8,21,43]. The detailed calculation method is presented in the study by Bąk and Kubiak-Wójcicka [44]. To calculate the SPI and SRI values for different time scales (n months), it was necessary to obtain values for the accumulation of precipitations or flows for each month and n months. In total, five different time series were analyzed, i.e., 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The index values defined the deviation from the median expressed in standard deviation units. The proposed approach was based on the assessment of water resources under different hydroclimatic conditions and the determination of different intensity classes. Extreme events were identified when the value of the index was above 1.0 or below −1.0, indicating wet periods and droughts, respectively. Depending on the obtained values, droughts were classified according to the adopted categories given in Table 1. Dry and wet periods were characterized with the following parameters: duration expressed in the number of months (D), size of the drought area (DM), and the intensity (I). Based on the Pearson correlation coefficient, the SPI and SRI were compared for different periods of accumulation. In cases where the correlation coefficient was above 0.7, it was assumed to be a strong relationship.

Trend Analysis
The non-parametric Mann-Kendall test [45,46], which is widely applied in hydrological analysis, was used to track changes in the river flow trends. The Mann-Kendall Z statistic and the slope β expressed using the Theil-Sen estimator [47,48] were calculated for periods covering every possible combination of the starting and ending years for the multiannual period studied. The 30-year period used in hydrological calculations was assumed as the minimum length of the calculation period [49,50].
The Mann-Kendall S statistic was calculated using the following formula: where x j and x k -values of the variable in individual years j and k, where j > k; n-number of years. The S statistic shows a tendency to move quickly toward normality, and for n > 10, this statistic has an approximately normal distribution with an average of 0 and a variance described by the following formula: The normalized test Z statistic was calculated using the following formula: In the Mann-Kendall test, the null hypothesis is that there is no significant trend in the data series. The trend is significant if the null hypothesis cannot be accepted. The acceptance region at the significance level α = 0.05 defines the range −1.96 ≤ Z ≤ 1.96 (no significant trend), while the rejection region is given by Z < −1.96 (significant downward trend) and Z > 1.96 (significant upward trend), where Z is the normalized test statistic.
The slope β expressed by the Theil-Sen estimator (β) was calculated using the following formula:

Precipitations and Flows in 1970-2019
The analyzed multi-year period 1970-2019 was characterized by a diversified distribution of precipitation within the Laborec river catchment area. The lowest amounts of precipitation occurred in 2015 and 2003 ( Table 2). The highest amount of precipitation was recorded in 2010, and depending on the station, this year's precipitation was higher by 36.7-48.1% relative to the long-term value. High precipitation totals were also recorded in 1970, 1974, 1980, 1998, and 2004. Anomalous annual precipitation totals were as high as 300 mm per year ( Figure 2). Annual sums of atmospheric precipitation in the Laborec river catchment area indicated significant spatial differentiation. Higher precipitation was recorded at stations located in the northern and eastern parts of the Laborec river catchment (from 800 to 1000 mm per year), while in the southern part of the catchment, below the Humenne station, the average annual precipitation was lower and ranged from 600 to 700 mm per year [27,30].
The analysis of MK trends showed that at the Medzilaborce and Michalovce stations, a slight upward trend in the annual sums of precipitation was recorded in the analyzed multi-year period, while in the case of the Kamenica station, there was a weak downward trend. The trends were not statistically significant.
In seasonal terms, the amount of precipitation in the summer semester (about 61-65% of the annual precipitation) was larger than the precipitation in the winter half-year (about 35-39% of the annual precipitation). The distribution of monthly precipitation totals showed less precipitation in winter (February) and much higher precipitation in summer (July). The analysis of MK trends showed that at the Medzilaborce and Michalovce stations, a slight upward trend in the annual sums of precipitation was recorded in the analyzed multi-year period, while in the case of the Kamenica station, there was a weak downward trend. The trends were not statistically significant.
In seasonal terms, the amount of precipitation in the summer semester (about 61-65% of the annual precipitation) was larger than the precipitation in the winter half-year (about 35-39% of the annual precipitation). The distribution of monthly precipitation totals showed less precipitation in winter (February) and much higher precipitation in summer (July).
The    The analysis of MK trends showed that at the Medzilaborce and Michalovce stations, a slight upward trend in the annual sums of precipitation was recorded in the analyzed multi-year period, while in the case of the Kamenica station, there was a weak downward trend. The trends were not statistically significant.
In seasonal terms, the amount of precipitation in the summer semester (about 61-65% of the annual precipitation) was larger than the precipitation in the winter half-year (about 35-39% of the annual precipitation). The distribution of monthly precipitation totals showed less precipitation in winter (February) and much higher precipitation in summer (July).
The    Hydrological observations at the Izkovce gauging station covered the multi-year period 1975-2019. The average annual flow in this period was 51.28 m 3 ·s −1 (Figure 4). The highest flows were recorded in 1979 (697.1 m 3 ·s −1 ) and 1980 (646.2 m 3 ·s −1 ). The lowest flows were recorded in 2015 (2.42 m 3 ·s −1 ) and 1987 (5.00 m 3 ·s −1 ). The flow variation between the Humenne station and Izkovce was due to the intake of a large amount of water from the Uh tributary, which flows into the Laborec River below the Humenne station. In the case of the annual flows of the Laborec River at the Humenne and Izkovce hydrological stations, a downward trend was recorded. The obtained precipitation and flow trends were statistically insignificant (Table 3 and Table 4).

Analysis of the Dry and Wet Periods Using the SPI and SRI
The SPI and SRI were used to analyze the frequency of occurrence of dry and wet periods, which were calculated for five periods of accumulation, i.e., 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Table 5 presents the parameters of the wet and dry periods, including the duration (in months), as well as the maximum and minimum values of the SPI.
The highest SPI values represented extremely wet months, while the lowest SPI values represented extremely dry months. The extreme SPI values were different at three  In the case of the annual flows of the Laborec River at the Humenne and Izkovce hydrological stations, a downward trend was recorded. The obtained precipitation and flow trends were statistically insignificant (Tables 3 and 4).

Analysis of the Dry and Wet Periods Using the SPI and SRI
The SPI and SRI were used to analyze the frequency of occurrence of dry and wet periods, which were calculated for five periods of accumulation, i.e., 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Table 5   The minimum SPI values in the analyzed multi-year period ranged from −2.40 in longer accumulation periods, i.e., 9 and 12 months, to −4.68 in short (one-month) accumulation periods. Compared to wet periods, dry periods occurred in different years, depending on the adopted accumulation period. The lowest SPI values were recorded in 1973,1974,1987,2003, and 2012. The largest difference between the minimum SPI values was recorded at the Medzilaborce station (2.28), while at the Kamenica (1.53) and Michalovce (1.11) stations, the values were much lower (Table 5).   On the other hand, at the Izkovce station, the number of wet months ranged from 13.5 to 17.8% of the analyzed period, while the dry months ranged from 14.4 to 16.2%. The difference in the duration of dry and wet periods between the individual stations may have been due to the shorter period of data for the Izkovce station. In the period 1970-2019, there were more months with hydrological droughts (SRI below −1.0) than with meteorological droughts (SPI below −1.0) in the one-month accumulation period. Meteorological droughts in this period showed greater intensity (they reached higher extreme values of the index) than hydrological droughts. In the longer periods of accumulation, the number of wet and dry months at meteorological and hydrological stations was similar.

Comparison of Drought Classes Based on the SPI and SRI
Using the threshold values presented in Table 1, a detailed division of the SPI and SRI values into individual classes was made (Tables 7 and 8). The highest number of months was recorded in the normal class, where the total number of months with SPI values between 1.0 and −1.0 accounted for 65.7 to 71.6% of all months in the analyzed period 1970-2019. In the case of the SRI, the number of months in the normal class was lower, accounting for 64.8 to 67.8%. In the moderately dry class, meteorological droughts ranged from 3.8 to 5.7%, while in the case of hydrological drought, the total drought duration was twice as high, ranging from 8.8 to 11% of all months in the analyzed period. The SPI and SRI values in the severely dry class were similar, ranging from 3.8 to 6.3% of the analyzed period. Extremely dry droughts had the lowest percentage share. They constituted from 0.5 to 3.0% of the analyzed period. The number of months with SPI and SRI values in the moderately wet class was similar, accounting for a total of 6.7 to 12.3% of the analyzed period. SPI values in the severely wet class ranged from 2.2 to 5.5% of the analyzed period. The lowest percentages were found for months in the extremely wet and extremely dry classes.
It should be noted that the number of months with meteorological droughts in the extremely wet class was smaller than the number of months with hydrological droughts in the same class in the one-month accumulation period. This means that short-term but heavy precipitation within one month resulted in high flows that lasted more than one month. In the extremely dry class, there was a greater number of months with meteorological drought compared to hydrological drought. This means that the occurrence of extreme meteorological phenomena was mitigated to some extent by the catchment area, leading to fewer months with hydrological droughts.

Relations between Meteorological and Hydrological Droughts
The detailed course of SPI and SRI values over different periods of accumulation is presented using the example of the Humenne hydrological station and Medzilaborce meteorological station ( Figure 5). In the analyzed period 1970-2019, the dry years are separated by wet years. The course of hydrological drought expressed by the SRI was similar to those of the SPI. Undoubtedly, the fluctuation and variability of the SPI and SRI series show consistent patterns over the studied period. However, the degree of consistency changed over time (years 1970-2019).
The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between meteorological droughts and hydrological droughts based on the SPI and SRI values (Table 9).  It should be noted that the number of months with meteorological droughts in the extremely wet class was smaller than the number of months with hydrological droughts in the same class in the one-month accumulation period. This means that short-term but heavy precipitation within one month resulted in high flows that lasted more than one month. In the extremely dry class, there was a greater number of months with meteorological drought compared to hydrological drought. This means that the occurrence of extreme meteorological phenomena was mitigated to some extent by the catchment area, leading to fewer months with hydrological droughts.

Relations between Meteorological and Hydrological Droughts
The detailed course of SPI and SRI values over different periods of accumulation is presented using the example of the Humenne hydrological station and Medzilaborce meteorological station ( Figure 5). In the analyzed period 1970-2019, the dry years are separated by wet years. The course of hydrological drought expressed by the SRI was similar to those of the SPI. Undoubtedly, the fluctuation and variability of the SPI and SRI series show consistent patterns over the studied period. However, the degree of consistency changed over time (years 1970-2019).  The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between meteorological droughts and hydrological droughts based on the SPI and SRI values (Table 9). Table 9. Correlation coefficients between the meteorological drought and hydrological drought using the SPI for Medzilaborce vs. the SRI for Humenne. XI  XII  I  II  III  IV  V  VI  VII  VIII  IX  The highest annual correlation coefficient (r = 0.72) was found between SRI-6 at the Humenne station and SPI-9 at the Medzilaborce station. A similar relationship appeared between SRI-6 at the Humenne station and SPI-9 at the Kamenica station (r = 0.69). As indicated by the cross-relationships established in different periods of accumulation of flows and precipitation, hydrological droughts appeared as a result of meteorological droughts with a three-month delay. The correlation coefficients between the SRI and SPI in individual months reached different values. High correlations between the SPI and SRI were noted in longer accumulation periods (6 to 12 months). The highest correlation (0.86) was recorded between SPI-9 and SRI-6 in December. High correlations (above 0.7) were also recorded in shorter accumulation periods (1 and 3 months) and occurred in the summer (VI-VIII) and autumn (X-XI) months. The lowest correlations or their complete absence were recorded mainly in January and February in the short period of accumulation, which should be associated with the occurrence of snowfall and its deposition in the catchment area. The relationship between meteorological droughts in the nine-month accumulation period (SPI-9) for the Medzilaborce station and hydrological droughts at the Humenne station in the six-month accumulation period (SRI-6) is shown in Figure 6. in individual months reached different values. High correlations between the SPI and SRI were noted in longer accumulation periods (6 to 12 months). The highest correlation (0.86) was recorded between SPI-9 and SRI-6 in December. High correlations (above 0.7) were also recorded in shorter accumulation periods (1 and 3 months) and occurred in the summer (VI-VIII) and autumn (X-XI) months. The lowest correlations or their complete absence were recorded mainly in January and February in the short period of accumulation, which should be associated with the occurrence of snowfall and its deposition in the catchment area. The relationship between meteorological droughts in the nine-month accumulation period (SPI-9) for the Medzilaborce station and hydrological droughts at the Humenne station in the six-month accumulation period (SRI-6) is shown in Figure 6. The correlations between SRI values at the Izkovce station and SPI values at the Medzilaborce, Kamenica, and Michalovce weather stations showed a relationship with much lower strength. The highest annual correlation coefficient (r = 0.69) was found between SRI-6 in the Izkovce profile and SPI-9 at the remaining meteorological stations. The lower dependency strength may have been due to the supply of significant amounts of water via the Uh River, which flows into the Laborec above the Izkovce station. Most of the Uh catchment area lies outside Slovakia.

Drought Index
Taking advantage of the high strength of the correlation between meteorological and hydrological droughts in the Laborec river catchment area, a simple procedure was used that was proposed by Kubiak-Wójcicka and Bąk [14]. It allowed us to determine the intensity of meteorological drought on the basis of current precipitation totals and the intensity of hydrological drought based on current amounts of flow. The SPI and SRI indicators over different time scales and for different stations may differ in their usefulness in drought and flood monitoring. The prepared nomograms were therefore appropriate for specific stations and emphasized the need for the comprehensive consideration of different time scales for the SPI and SRI, which could be used to monitor meteorological and hydrological droughts (Figure 7). Figure 7 shows representative nomograms that were prepared for the Medzilaborce meteorological station and the Humenne hydrological station. The presented nomograms made it possible to determine the limit values of the sum of precipitation or the sum of flows at a given station in different periods of accumulation at which wet or dry periods could be expected to occur. In practice, the proposed nomograms can be used to forecast meteorological and hydrological droughts in the coming months.
intensity of meteorological drought on the basis of current precipitation totals and the intensity of hydrological drought based on current amounts of flow. The SPI and SRI indicators over different time scales and for different stations may differ in their usefulness in drought and flood monitoring. The prepared nomograms were therefore appropriate for specific stations and emphasized the need for the comprehensive consideration of different time scales for the SPI and SRI, which could be used to monitor meteorological and hydrological droughts (Figure 7).

Discussion
The analysis of meteorological phenomena and subsequently hydrological phenomena is an issue under increasing consideration by many researchers. They are devoting the most attention to extreme hydrometeorological events, such as floods and droughts, due to the economic losses they entail. Establishing the relationship between precipitations and river flows within a catchment area can be used for early warnings of extreme events.
The results obtained in this study relate to drought and flood phenomena alike, which were recorded within the analyzed Laborec river catchment area. The selection of standardized indicators for the assessment of extreme weather events made it possible to compare meteorological droughts with hydrological droughts in different parts of the catchment area. As shown by the analysis, the annual correlations between meteorological droughts and hydrological droughts in the Laborec river basin were at a high level (above 0.7). The response of the catchment area to an excess or shortage of precipitation is visible with a three-month delay. To a large extent, the impact of meteorological drought on hydrological drought was conditioned by the physical and geographical conditions of the catchment area (geological structure, land use, catchment size). Strong correlations between meteorological and hydrological droughts were confirmed in short accumulation periods of 1-2 months by Vicente-Serrano and López-Moreno [51] for small rivers in the Mediterranean region, as well as selected regions of China [52]. In the catchments of rivers located in semi-arid and arid zones, the highest correlations between droughts were obtained with a delay of 3-4 months [53]. The greatest correlation strength was most common in small mountain catchments. In the case of the Laborec River, the strongest correlation occurred in the accumulation periods of 6 and 9 months. In small lowland river catchments with a high degree of soil permeability in northern Poland, the highest annual correlation coefficient (r = 0.63) was obtained for a period of 9 and 12 months [54,55]. Research conducted in Turkey showed a one-year delay time correlation between meteorological and hydrological droughts [56]. Smaller correlation coefficients between droughts (annual r above 0.5) were identified by Ljubenkov and Cindrić Kalin [57] for accumulation periods above 6, 9, and 12 months in the Croatian region of Dalmatia.
In the case of large catchments, the strength of the correlation between SPI and SRI was much lower, and the highest correlation coefficients were recorded over longer periods of accumulation. An example is the Vistula river basin, where the greatest strength of the relationship occurred over periods of 18 and 24 months [14]. Relatively low correlation values (below r = 0.5) between droughts were noted by Rimkus et al. [58] in the Neman river basin, which was conditioned by snowfall. Understanding the catchment response time to changing meteorological conditions is an extremely important issue that will allow people to prepare early enough for the possibility of extreme events. As presented, the correlations between precipitations and flows are different in particular regions and climatic zones. Analysis of the correlation between the SPI and SRI over many time scales shows that the catchment area produces a weaker response to precipitation over short time scales, and this changes gradually as the accumulation period increases. The strongest annual correlations were obtained between the periods of 9-month precipitation and 6-month flow accumulation.

Conclusions
This work focused on the use of standardized indicators to calculate the frequency of dry and wet periods in the Laborec river catchment in Slovakia. The relationship between precipitation and flow was assessed on the basis of the standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the standardized flow index (SRI). Fluctuations in the SPI and SRI time series over different time scales were to some extent consistent and correlated, and the correlation increased with lengthening time scales (1970-2019). The highest annual correlation coefficient (r = 0.72) was recorded between SRI-6 at the Humenne hydrometric station and SPI-9 at the Medzilaborce meteorological station in the upper part of the Laborec river basin. In the lower part of the catchment, the strongest annual correlation (r = 0.69) was obtained between the Izkovce and Kamenica gauging stations. The conducted analysis showed that in the case of the Laborec river catchment area, there was a strong correlation between the occurrence of meteorological drought and hydrological drought. Using the knowledge of this relationship, the response time of the catchment to changing meteorological conditions can be predicted. The prepared nomograms are a tool for monitoring extreme phenomena based on the current amounts of precipitations and flows. The proposed method may be useful for the early detection and warning of droughts and floods, enabling the implementation of preventive measures and limiting economic losses, which was not done before for the study area.
The analysis of meteorological and hydrological conditions using short-term and longterm data is an important step toward establishing effective and comprehensive monitoring and an early warning system against extreme weather events. Understanding the specific response of the catchment area to an excess or shortage of precipitation will facilitate the possibility of enhancing adaptation to climate change. Data Availability Statement: The data are not publicly available due to institutional property rights.