Drought Risk Assessment in Cultivated Areas of Central Asia Using MODIS Time-Series Data

: Drought is one of the most damaging environmental hazards and a naturally occurring phenomenon in Central Asia that is accompanied by crucial consequences for the agriculture sector. This research aimed at understanding the nature and extent of drought over the cropland regions of Central Asia with the help of spatiotemporal information from the region. We assessed drought occurrence using the vegetation health index (VHI). An algorithm was developed to reduce the noise of heterogeneous land surfaces by adjusting the vegetation index and brightness temperature. The vegetation condition index (VCI) and temperature condition index (TCI) were calculated using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) products for the growing season (April–September) from 2000 to 2015. The intense drought years were identiﬁed and a drought map (drought probability occurrence) was generated. The ﬁndings of this research indicated regional heterogeneity in the cropland areas having experienced droughts, observed through spatiotemporal variations. Some of the rain-fed and irrigated croplands of Kazakhstan demonstrated a higher vulnerability to annual drought occurrences and climate change impacts, while other cropland regions were found to be more resistant to such changes. The development of policy tools is required to support informed decision-making and planning processes to adapt to the occurrence of droughts. This could be achieved by the timely assessment, monitoring, and evaluation of the spatiotemporal distribution trends and variabilities of drought occurrences in this region. The results from this study focus on the spatiotemporal variations in drought to reveal the bigger picture in order to better understand the regional capacity for sustainable land management and agricultural activities within a changing environment.


Introduction
Drought occurrence is primarily a climatic event which is characterized by anomalies in the accumulated precipitation, reduced soil moisture, and decreased river runoff [1]. Under climate change [2], drought has been identified as one of the natural disasters with the potential for a recently increased to over 150 days a year over the whole region. Even with no significant changes in precipitation, the increased atmospheric temperatures can still lead to higher rates of evaporation and evapotranspiration, resulting in a decreased ground water availability.
A drought risk assessment for cropland is imperative to determine the overall regional productivity and to avert or mitigate the impact of environmental change for higher crop resilience. Timely information about the onset of drought, its extent, intensity, duration, and impacts can help to limit drought-related losses to society and human life while minimizing human suffering and reducing damage to the economy and the environment. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential applicability of a drought index for the Central Asia region while assessing the seasonal drought characteristics in order to investigate the spatiotemporal pattern of drought occurrences and changes for the region.

Study Area
Central Asia was selected as the study area for this work. The region consists of the five countries of Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, which together cover over 4 million km 2 of territory in the Asian continent. The region is defined by a continental climate with cold winters and hot summers. The annual average precipitation is 150 mm in the temperate desert, 300 mm in the temperate steppes, and 600 mm in the temperate mountain regions, and the majority of precipitation falls as snow [22,23]. The territory is mainly covered by grasslands and barren areas ( Figure 1), with an uneven distribution of precipitation [4]. Moisture and water availability are the main factors controlling the distribution of cropland areas across Central Asia. Consequently, crops are less affected by drought than natural vegetation [24][25][26], due to the comparatively higher amount of rain during summer and irrigation. Dense cropland areas are found in the southern and northern parts of the region. Spatiotemporal studies of the cropland areas in Central Asia are still relatively few in number compared to studies of the decreasing volume of the Aral Sea, water resources, and climate change [27,28]. In fact, the impact of agriculture on the environment has been studied more due to the fragility of the ecosystem.

Cropland Extraction
The cropland regions were extracted from the European Space Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative Land Cover (CCI LC) dataset, which is a free global dataset providing land-cover information from 1992 to 2015 at a spatial resolution of 300 m. ESA produced the CCL LC maps from spectral and temporal data obtained by the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), Satellite Pour l'Observation dela Terre (SPOT) Vegetation, Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS), and Sentinel systems [33]. The land-cover map contains 22 different classes, including rain- Agriculture is one of the main industries contributing to the Central Asian economy, and 20% to 60% of the entire population is linked to the agricultural sector, increasing the national GDP by 8% to 30% [29]. Institutional change during the 1990s had an impact on the stability and productivity of agriculture, but since 2000 most of the region's cropland area has been recovered or restored [30,31]. Wheat is the chief crop in the region, occupying more than 50% of the cropland area in all five countries [6]. Overall, wheat production has increased during the study period (2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015), but during unfavorable years wheat productivity has declined by 20% to 60% [6,32].

Cropland Extraction
The cropland regions were extracted from the European Space Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative Land Cover (CCI LC) dataset, which is a free global dataset providing land-cover information from 1992 to 2015 at a spatial resolution of 300 m. ESA produced the CCL LC maps from spectral and temporal data obtained by the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), Satellite Pour l'Observation dela Terre (SPOT) Vegetation, Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS), and Sentinel systems [33]. The land-cover map contains 22 different classes, including rain-fed and irrigated cropland [34]. All the classes other than cropland (rain-fed and irrigated) were masked out. Only the regions classified as cropland for each season during the study period (2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015), according to the CCI LC data, were used for the time-series data analysis and the extraction of the drought index changes over the 16 years.

Drought Index Calculation
The MODIS datasets and products have been widely used to address environmental issues due to their relatively high spatial, spectral, and temporal resolutions [35][36][37]. The MODIS, MOD13Q1, and MOD11C2 products used in this study were downloaded from the https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis. nasa.gov/ and https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/ websites for the period of 2000 to 2015. The study analysis covered eight tiles of MOD13Q1 and MOD11C2 (h21v03, h21v04, h22v03, h22v04, h22v05, h23v03, h23v04, h23v05). The downloaded sinusoidal projected MODIS tiles were mosaicked and reprojected using the MODIS Reprojection Tool (MRT), which can be downloaded freely from https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/tools/. The MODIS land surface temperature (LST) product is produced from thermal infrared bands (bands 31 and 32 in the range of 10.780-11.280 and 11.770-12.270 µkm) and provides information on how hot the land surface is [38]. The MODIS enhanced vegetation index (EVI) data are computed from surface reflectance data, based on the fact that the chlorophyll pigment in plant leaves absorbs the red (670 nm) and blue (470 nm) wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum while strongly scattering the near-infrared (NIR) portion.
Consequently, the VCI is computed from the EVI time series using the reflectance data in the visible and NIR bands, and the TCI is computed from brightness temperature data from the MODIS thermal infrared spectral band [39]. The VHI, TCI, and VCI can be expressed as follows: where NIR, Red, and Blue are the surface reflectance; LST and EVI are the downloaded MODIS products; LSTmax and LSTmin are the maximum and minimum values of LST; and EVImax and EVImin are the maximum and minimum values of EVI, respectively. The maximum and minimum EVI and LST values for each of the 16 days (the EVI product is available for each 16 days and the values of the LST product were averaged for each of the 16 days due to its availability for each 8 days) were calculated from April to September at the pixel scale with a spatial resolution of 250 m. Monthly and annual levels were produced for the analysis of the results. The VHI is a result of a weighted average of two indices and ranges from 0 to 1. In this work, we followed the standard definition of the VHI, where the weights are equal (0.5) for the TCI and the VCI (Equation (1)). For easy calculation, the VHI results were multiplied by 100 and thus range from 0 to 100, where 0 is minimum value of VHI and quantified as extreme crop stress and 100 is maximum value of VHI and is the most optimal condition for crops [39][40][41][42]. By considering the high correlation of VHI < 40 and crop stress, which has also been used and verified in previous drought studies, the VHI was categorized into five classes based on the threshold values expressed in the following table (Table 1).

Drought Probability Mapping
Drought recurrence, duration, and severity are vital aspects for water supply management, because droughts exacerbate the scarcity of natural water availability and resources. The probability of the occurrence of drought was therefore calculated at the pixel level by extracting drought events. The probability of a drought event (p), considering all the growing season time, was calculated as follows:p = n/N, where n is the number of years that the drought event occurred in a period of N (16 years), and the confidence interval for p is p ∈p ∓ 2 p(1 −p)/N [13].

Trend Analysis
The trend analysis of environmental parameters plays an important role in the development and sustainable management of natural resources. A long-term change analysis was performed in this study using a linear approach. The linear trends were calculated for the yearly and monthly period of 2000-2015. A straight line was adjusted to each pixel location in the time-series data by using the least squares linear regression method. The linear regression line can be computed as follows: The extracted regression line was then used to estimate the slope, where x (time) and y (drought) are the explanatory variable and dependent variable, respectively, while a and b are the intercept and slope, respectively. The slope indicates the temporal change of the studied variable at the pixel level. A positive slope indicates an increasing trend, while a negative slope indicates a decreasing trend. The adjustment to extracted regression line was evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficients, which reflect the degree of linear dependency between the datasets. The significance of the coefficients was evaluated at the 90-99% confidence level.

Drought Distribution
An area of more than 430,000 km 2 of permanent cropland was studied. The drought extent and intensity in the cultivated areas have shown heterogeneous patterns and have varied annually at spatiotemporal scales, affecting the crop yield. However, when combined with geographical factors, the spatial coverage and intensity of the drought in Central Asia have shown negligible variation between countries. During the entire study period, the annual drought area (VHI < 40) covered 37% of the total cropland region in Kyrgyzstan; 40% in Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan; and 41% in Turkmenistan. Annually, an average of 40% of the cropland area of Central Asia was found to have been affected by drought, varying between 20% and 57%. Furthermore, in our results, five years (2000,2004,2008,2010,2012) counted as significant drought episodes for the whole of the Central Asia region, affecting more than 50% of the total cropland of the region (Figure 2). The areal extent of the extreme drought category occupied around 4% of the cropland territory, while the severe drought category accounted for 8%, the moderate drought category covered 12%, and the mild drought category occupied 16%, by annual average, including drought and nondrought years. During the significant drought years (2000,2004,2008,2010,2012) comparatively to non-drought years, the areal extent of the extreme and severe drought categories was significantly higher than for the moderate and mild drought categories (Figure 3). Moderate and mild droughts naturally occurred annually, mainly at the initial and final stages of crops during the time of the growing season, and they did not change significantly during the significant drought years (2000,2004,2008,2010,2012). The drought-prone months were May, June, August, and September, when the areal extent of the drought coverage was between 40% and 45% of the area. April and July were the months least affected by drought, where the drought coverage was about 30% to 40%, except for the significant drought years. The areal extent of the extreme drought category occupied around 4% of the cropland territory, while the severe drought category accounted for 8%, the moderate drought category covered 12%, and the mild drought category occupied 16%, by annual average, including drought and non-drought years. During the significant drought years (2000,2004,2008,2010,2012) comparatively to non-drought years, the areal extent of the extreme and severe drought categories was significantly higher than for the moderate and mild drought categories (Figure 3). Moderate and mild droughts naturally occurred annually, mainly at the initial and final stages of crops during the time of the growing season, and they did not change significantly during the significant drought years (2000,2004,2008,2010,2012). The drought-prone months were May, June, August, and September, when the areal extent of the drought coverage was between 40% and 45% of the area. April and July were the months least affected by drought, where the drought coverage was about 30% to 40%, except for the significant drought years.

Drought Map
A pixel-based map of the drought occurrence probability in cultivated areas was generated using Equation (5). The map represents the high and low drought occurrence probability regions ( Figure 4). Overall, for the cropland of Central Asia, the drought probability occurrence is one time in four years, while spatially it varies from once in every two years to once in every eight years, as presented in the drought probability occurrence map (Figure 4). The irrigated regions, especially in Uzbekistan, are showing less vulnerability to drought incidents except for the dominant part of the irrigated croplands in Kazakhstan, which are experiencing drought occurrences, in overall, every three years. In addition, rain-fed crops in the east and north part of Kazakhstan and rain-fed crops in Kyrgyzstan are showing less vulnerability to drought than the west, central, north-east rain-fed crops of Kazakhstan. In total, 74% of the area has a probability of drought occurrence equal to or less than 40%, and 26% of the area (mainly located in the territory of Kazakhstan) has a probability of drought occurrence of higher than 40%.

Drought Map
A pixel-based map of the drought occurrence probability in cultivated areas was generated using Equation (5). The map represents the high and low drought occurrence probability regions ( Figure 4). Overall, for the cropland of Central Asia, the drought probability occurrence is one time in four years, while spatially it varies from once in every two years to once in every eight years, as presented in the drought probability occurrence map (Figure 4). The irrigated regions, especially in Uzbekistan, are showing less vulnerability to drought incidents except for the dominant part of the irrigated croplands in Kazakhstan, which are experiencing drought occurrences, in overall, every three years. In addition, rain-fed crops in the east and north part of Kazakhstan and rain-fed crops in Kyrgyzstan are showing less vulnerability to drought than the west, central, north-east rain-fed crops of Kazakhstan. In total, 74% of the area has a probability of drought occurrence equal to or less than 40%, and 26% of the area (mainly located in the territory of Kazakhstan) has a probability of drought occurrence of higher than 40%.

Drought Map
A pixel-based map of the drought occurrence probability in cultivated areas was generated using Equation (5). The map represents the high and low drought occurrence probability regions ( Figure 4). Overall, for the cropland of Central Asia, the drought probability occurrence is one time in four years, while spatially it varies from once in every two years to once in every eight years, as presented in the drought probability occurrence map (Figure 4). The irrigated regions, especially in Uzbekistan, are showing less vulnerability to drought incidents except for the dominant part of the irrigated croplands in Kazakhstan, which are experiencing drought occurrences, in overall, every three years. In addition, rain-fed crops in the east and north part of Kazakhstan and rain-fed crops in Kyrgyzstan are showing less vulnerability to drought than the west, central, north-east rain-fed crops of Kazakhstan. In total, 74% of the area has a probability of drought occurrence equal to or less than

Drought Index Change
The spatiotemporal wetting and drying trends for Central Asia were extracted by calculating the slope of the drought index for the 16 years, as discussed in Section 2.5. The calculated slope for the drought index shows a non-homogeneous change in the spatiotemporal dimension, with a general trend of drying over rain-fed crop areas and wetting over irrigated cropland areas, except for some regions of irrigated cropland in Kazakhstan. For our study period of 16 years, the analysis of the annual drought index results reveals spatially significant drying and wetting trends on 14% and 8% of the area, respectively. Therefore, over these years, the annual drought-affected region has increased from 37% to 44%. The annual change in the value of drought index in most of the cropland regions of Central Asia is not significant (the average value of VHI over the study region is 46), and can be mainly considered as no change, but regions where there has been a change (of VHI < −20 and VHI > 20) demonstrate a significance value of 90-99% ( Figure 5). The three other classes (−20 to −10, −10 to 10, and 10 to 20), although covering the maximum spatial extent, have undergone changes, but these are not significant, covering the cropland areas in the north, north-east, and east of Kazakhstan, as well as Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan. Positive changes are mainly found in Tajikistan and some parts of Uzbekistan. A negative linear slope with high significance is mainly found over the rain-fed crop areas in the western, northwestern, and over irrigated crop areas in the southern regions of Kazakhstan.

Drought Index Change
The spatiotemporal wetting and drying trends for Central Asia were extracted by calculating the slope of the drought index for the 16 years, as discussed in Section 2.5. The calculated slope for the drought index shows a non-homogeneous change in the spatiotemporal dimension, with a general trend of drying over rain-fed crop areas and wetting over irrigated cropland areas, except for some regions of irrigated cropland in Kazakhstan. For our study period of 16 years, the analysis of the annual drought index results reveals spatially significant drying and wetting trends on 14% and 8% of the area, respectively. Therefore, over these years, the annual drought-affected region has increased from 37% to 44%. The annual change in the value of drought index in most of the cropland regions of Central Asia is not significant (the average value of VHI over the study region is 46), and can be mainly considered as no change, but regions where there has been a change (of VHI < −20 and VHI > 20) demonstrate a significance value of 90-99% ( Figure 5). The three other classes (−20 to −10, −10 to 10, and 10 to 20), although covering the maximum spatial extent, have undergone changes, but these are not significant, covering the cropland areas in the north, north-east, and east of Kazakhstan, as well as Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan. Positive changes are mainly found in Tajikistan and some parts of Uzbekistan. A negative linear slope with high significance is mainly found over the rain-fed crop areas in the western, northwestern, and over irrigated crop areas in the southern regions of Kazakhstan. The monthly change of the drought index also differs ( Figure 6). June is the month when the drought index shows a significant drying trend over Central Asia's cropland region. Overall, in June, 36% of the area experienced a strong significant drying trend over Central Asia, with areal concentrations observed in the cropland areas of Kazakhstan. In contrast, 10% of the area experienced a strong significant wetting trend, mainly over irrigated cropland areas, during August and September. The western region of Kazakhstan has shown the highest increment of drought region per annum (4% area), and a higher drought region increase per annum (6% area) can be observed in the individual monthly calculations for June and July, with the highest rate of significance (99%) being seen during these months. The monthly change of the drought index also differs ( Figure 6). June is the month when the drought index shows a significant drying trend over Central Asia's cropland region. Overall, in June, 36% of the area experienced a strong significant drying trend over Central Asia, with areal concentrations observed in the cropland areas of Kazakhstan. In contrast, 10% of the area experienced a strong significant wetting trend, mainly over irrigated cropland areas, during August and September. The western region of Kazakhstan has shown the highest increment of drought region per annum (4% area), and a higher drought region increase per annum (6% area) can be observed in the individual monthly calculations for June and July, with the highest rate of significance (99%) being seen during these months.

Discussion
Yield prediction is one of the most important tasks when attempting to mitigate food crises in the growing world. As drought is one of the main reasons for yield failure, drought assessment is an important task in a changing environment. In summary, in this study the estimation and calculation of the drought index revealed five historic agricultural drought years (2000,2004,2008,2010,2012), with the drought area (VHI < 40) occupying more than 50% of the total cropland area, explaining the years of lower productivity between 2000 and 2015. The extreme and severe droughts in 2000 mainly hit the south of the region, affecting all five countries, and decreasing the chief crop yield (wheat) by 39% in Uzbekistan and 49% in Tajikistan [6]. In 2004, 2010, and 2012, the area affected by drought increased in the north of the region, decreasing wheat production in Kazakhstan by around 21%, 31%, and 36% in 2004, 2010, and 2012, respectively [6,32], which mainly occurred due to precipitation decreases during the important time of wheat growth [43,44]. In 2008, wheat production decreased by 22% in Kyrgyzstan [6]. Our results based on spatiotemporal drought trends did not reveal any agreement of drought occurrence with wheat yield variations over Turkmenistan [6].
The explanation of drought occurrences over Central Asia indicates different causes at the micro and macro climatic scales. At the micro scale, the drought can be explained by increased heat and limited moisture, which are primarily caused by local climate variations or decreased river runoff [32,45]. At the macro scale, drought and heatwaves over the northern regions of Eurasia can be linked to anticyclones caused by the invasion of Arctic air masses or prolonged atmospheric blocking events in connection with Rossby waves [46][47][48]. The prolonged duration of the La Niña phenomenon and the unusually warm sea surface temperature (SST) in the Western Pacific could be the main reason for the hydrological drought in the south of Central Asia [49], which can also be linked to regulatory water management practices [50].
Drought cannot be stopped and is difficult to forecast through the assessment of historical datasets and monitoring of global climate conditions [51,52]. However, the global temperature increase has been identified as changing drought attributes over the last few decades, and several studies have also reported the significant drying trend observed over some of the regions of Central Asia [25,53]. Some of the scholars have reported that the most significant changes observed over cropland regions since the beginning of current century [54], which might be the impact of institutional, economic, and global climate changes over the study area [24,45,55]. Some studies have predicted that the region will get drier with increasing temperatures [56], which might significantly affect the cropland regions by decreasing the yield and increasing the food insecurity. However, currently irrigated regions (the southern part of Central Asia) are experiencing a wetting trend compared to some regions of rain-fed cropland, which are experiencing a significant drying trend. As a result, wheat production increased twofold during the study period (2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015) in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan [6]. This stability in terms of crop yield is in good agreement with the higher water

Discussion
Yield prediction is one of the most important tasks when attempting to mitigate food crises in the growing world. As drought is one of the main reasons for yield failure, drought assessment is an important task in a changing environment. In summary, in this study the estimation and calculation of the drought index revealed five historic agricultural drought years (2000,2004,2008,2010,2012), with the drought area (VHI < 40) occupying more than 50% of the total cropland area, explaining the years of lower productivity between 2000 and 2015. The extreme and severe droughts in 2000 mainly hit the south of the region, affecting all five countries, and decreasing the chief crop yield (wheat) by 39% in Uzbekistan and 49% in Tajikistan [6]. In 2004, 2010, and 2012, the area affected by drought increased in the north of the region, decreasing wheat production in Kazakhstan by around 21%, 31%, and 36% in 2004, 2010, and 2012, respectively [6,32], which mainly occurred due to precipitation decreases during the important time of wheat growth [43,44]. In 2008, wheat production decreased by 22% in Kyrgyzstan [6]. Our results based on spatiotemporal drought trends did not reveal any agreement of drought occurrence with wheat yield variations over Turkmenistan [6].
The explanation of drought occurrences over Central Asia indicates different causes at the micro and macro climatic scales. At the micro scale, the drought can be explained by increased heat and limited moisture, which are primarily caused by local climate variations or decreased river runoff [32,45]. At the macro scale, drought and heatwaves over the northern regions of Eurasia can be linked to anticyclones caused by the invasion of Arctic air masses or prolonged atmospheric blocking events in connection with Rossby waves [46][47][48]. The prolonged duration of the La Niña phenomenon and the unusually warm sea surface temperature (SST) in the Western Pacific could be the main reason for the hydrological drought in the south of Central Asia [49], which can also be linked to regulatory water management practices [50].
Drought cannot be stopped and is difficult to forecast through the assessment of historical datasets and monitoring of global climate conditions [51,52]. However, the global temperature increase has been identified as changing drought attributes over the last few decades, and several studies have also reported the significant drying trend observed over some of the regions of Central Asia [25,53]. Some of the scholars have reported that the most significant changes observed over cropland regions since the beginning of current century [54], which might be the impact of institutional, economic, and global climate changes over the study area [24,45,55]. Some studies have predicted that the region will get drier with increasing temperatures [56], which might significantly affect the cropland regions by decreasing the yield and increasing the food insecurity. However, currently irrigated regions (the southern part of Central Asia) are experiencing a wetting trend compared to some regions of rain-fed cropland, which are experiencing a significant drying trend. As a result, wheat production increased twofold during the study period (2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015) in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan [6]. This stability in terms of crop yield is in good agreement with the higher water availability, which may be related to increased precipitation [57], river runoff increases due to the melting of glaciers [7], or better water management practices [56].
Most developing economies are vulnerable to the climate hazards linked to climate change as a consequence of the low level of preparedness and resilience, and Central Asia is no exception [58]. Temperature and precipitation dynamics are the key climate factors for rain-fed areas, while for irrigated areas the availability of sufficient water resources becomes an important additional and related risk factor [59]. Climate change (hazards) may increase these risks even further, and adapting cultivation methods might be of less advantage in the future for some parts of Central Asia due to the unprecedented environmental changes. Studies related to the assessment of cropland regions need to further consider other factors such as river runoff, land cover, crop phenology, soil moisture, and other environmental changes [60][61][62]. These factors should be further considered when analyzing the influence of driving forces such as institutional, anthropogenic, and natural factors for resource availability at national, regional, and local scales to improve the regulation of natural resources. Several solutions have been proposed by scholars to resolve the future food security challenges of the region through the use of hydrological dams [63], changes in farming practices [62], and sustainable use of water resources [63] along with improved drought prediction using drought indices [41] for regional sustainability and food security.

Conclusions
This study has been an attempt to understand and assess the drought conditions over the arid regions of Central Asia using a drought index extracted from the freely available products of medium spatial resolution for the period 2000-2015. The initial focus of the work was an extraction of the monthly and yearly drought information at the spatial scale of Central Asia. Furthermore, a drought probability map and a map of the VHI trend were generated to aid in improved sustainable land management planning and the mitigation of climate change threats, with the potential to adapt agricultural practices accordingly. Some of the rain-fed and irrigated cropland regions of Kazakhstan are the areas being negatively affected by the drying trend, especially during June, which is the significant month for crop development in the west and north-west region of Kazakhstan. Future unprecedented changes relating to global climate change may affect the drought characteristics, such as intensity, duration, and frequency, posing a potential threat to the food security of the region. However, the decrease in the drought-affected area over the irrigated regions in the southern part of Central Asia indicates that it is possible to improve cropland management in order to ensure favorable harvests, directly helping regional food security.
Author Contributions: N.A., X.L., and S.I. were involved in conceptualizing the problem and identifying the data; H.G., W.W., and Z.S. mostly conducted the data integration; A.Y. and Y.H. assisted in the data analysis. All the authors helped with the design of the research methods, worked on the entire framework of this research, carried out the discussion and analysis, and assisted with the review of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.