Estimation of Urbanization Impacts on Local Weather : A Case Study in Northern China ( Jing-JinJi District )

With the past rapid economic development and large population growth, Jing-Jin-Ji District has been undergoing rapid urbanization, which has caused considerable regional weather changes in local regions. In this paper, we used the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to quantitatively analyze the effects of past urbanization and potential future urbanization on the regional weather in the center of Jing-Jin-Ji District. The hydrometeorological data from two weeks in July 2019 were used to simulate the influence of urbanization on local weather in the Jing-Jin-Ji District at regional scales using a single-layer canopy parameterization scheme. To better quantify the differences in temperature and precipitation induced by urbanization, three simulation scenarios were designed, which were no urban cover (NU), current urbanization cover (CU), and full urban land cover (FU), respectively. The results showed that: (1) Urbanization progress (from NU to CU and from CU to FU) in Jing-Jin-Ji District increased the daytime temperature, night temperature, and temperature difference between day and night, while decreasing the total rainfall and peak rainfall. (2) Compared with NU, the mean temperature of the CU and FU increased 0.3 K and 0.6 K, respectively, and the mean precipitation of CU and FU decreased by approximately 6% and 8.4%, respectively. (3) The main influence of urbanization on weather was reflected by the maximum temperature and peak rainfall, while the other impacts were relatively insignificant. (4) Compared with NU, the maximum temperature of CU and FU increased 0.82 K and 1.35 K, respectively, and the peak rainfall of NU and FU decreased by approximately 9.5% and 19.0%, respectively; The results of this study bring to light the urban management strategies for policy makers.


Introduction
Urbanization refers to the process in which the original, natural land surface is replaced by an artificial surface.Urbanization changes the surface roughness, the radiation and the thermal and dynamic characteristics of the underlying surface, and the atmosphere of the city; additionally, urbanization causes the energy and moisture balance to differ from the surrounding environment, which has impacts upon temperature and precipitation.
Water 2019, 11, 797 3 of 13 For example, the large-scale urbanization process increases the probability of an urban "dry island effect" [37], a city heat wave, fog and haze weather, and other phenomena in cities [38], and these events may cause widespread panic and hazards.Additionally, "Xiongan New Area" was approved as a national-level new area by the State Council in 2017, and since then, the project was under construction.It means another considerable urbanization in Jing-Jin-Ji District in the future.Thus, to study and develop effective strategies for Jing-Jin-Ji District, a deeper understanding of the influence of urbanization on regional weather is necessary.In this paper, the WRF model was applied to simulate the influence of urbanization on regional weather in the center of the Jing-Jin-Ji District at regional and short time scales.Due to the potential possibility of urbanization, we selected the junction of Bei-Jing, Tian-Jin, and Hebei Province as the research domain, which was indeed the center of this Jing-Jin-Ji District.In order to investigate the impact of urbanization on precipitation and temperature, we chose a typical moderate rainfall in the area (a more frequent rainfall).And three scenarios we designed and modeled: (i) No urban cover, all cover is grass (NU); (ii) current urbanization cover, semi grass and urban (CU); and (iii) full urban land cover, all cover is urban (FU).By comparing the simulations of these three scenarios, the differences in temperature and precipitation were more convincingly quantified.The results of this study bring to light the urban management strategies for policy makers.

Study Area
The Jing-Jin-Ji District is a common abbreviation used to refer to the close socio-economic ties of Bei-Jing, Tian-Jin, and Hebei Province (Hebei Province is also called Ji for short), and this region is a well-known economic development center in China, with a large population size (110 million).Jing-Jin-Ji District is located in the northern part of the North China Plain, and is surrounded by mountains on the western, northern and eastern sides (Figure 1).Jing-Jin-Ji District has a total area of 218,000 km 2 (84170 sq.mi.).In 2016, the gross domestic product of Jing-Jin-Ji District totaled 7461.26 billion-yuan, accounting for 10% of the country's total.
Water 2019, 1, x 3 of 13 For example, the large-scale urbanization process increases the probability of an urban "dry island effect" [37], a city heat wave, fog and haze weather, and other phenomena in cities [38], and these events may cause widespread panic and hazards.Additionally, "Xiongan New Area" was approved as a national-level new area by the State Council in 2017, and since then, the project was under construction.It means another considerable urbanization in Jing-Jin-Ji District in the future.Thus, to study and develop effective strategies for Jing-Jin-Ji District, a deeper understanding of the influence of urbanization on regional weather is necessary.In this paper, the WRF model was applied to simulate the influence of urbanization on regional weather in the center of the Jing-Jin-Ji District at regional and short time scales.Due to the potential possibility of urbanization, we selected the junction of Bei-Jing, Tian-Jin, and Hebei Province as the research domain, which was indeed the center of this Jing-Jin-Ji District.In order to investigate the impact of urbanization on precipitation and temperature, we chose a typical moderate rainfall in the area (a more frequent rainfall).And three scenarios we designed and modeled: (i) No urban cover, all cover is grass (NU); (ii) current urbanization cover, semi grass and urban (CU); and (iii) full urban land cover, all cover is urban (FU).By comparing the simulations of these three scenarios, the differences in temperature and precipitation were more convincingly quantified.The results of this study bring to light the urban management strategies for policy makers.

Study Area
The Jing-Jin-Ji District is a common abbreviation used to refer to the close socio-economic ties of Bei-Jing, Tian-Jin, and Hebei Province (Hebei Province is also called Ji for short), and this region is a well-known economic development center in China, with a large population size (110 million).Jing-Jin-Ji District is located in the northern part of the North China Plain, and is surrounded by mountains on the western, northern and eastern sides (Figure 1).Jing-Jin-Ji District has a total area of 218,000 km 2 (84170 sq.mi.).In 2016, the gross domestic product of Jing-Jin-Ji District totaled 7461.26 billionyuan, accounting for 10% of the country's total.Due to the Siberian air masses that move southward across the Mongolian Plateau, Jing-Jin-Ji District has a typical continental monsoon climate, and its winters are cold and dry.The summers are hot due to the warm and humid monsoon winds from the southeast that bring the city most of its annual precipitation of approximately 600~700 mm; furthermore, most precipitation falls in July and August.The distribution of buildings and vegetation in the center of the city remain basically unchanged in future.However, in the center of Jing-Jin-Ji District, there is still ample space for urbanization.Therefore, the suburban region is more suitable for use as our study area.However, the District recently faced severe water-related problems, including urban flooding, water shortages, and water pollution.Figure 1 presents the location of the study area and the meteorological stations that collected the precipitation and temperature data.

WRF Model
The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, which was used here to investigate the influence of urbanization in Jing-Jin-Ji District, is a mesoscale numerical weather forecasting system designed to serve both atmospheric research and operational prediction needs.The WRF model was developed by the National Center for Atmospheric Research, USA (NCAR), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA (NOAA), the National Centers for Environmental Prediction, USA (NCEP), the Forecast Systems Laboratory (FSL), and other collaborators.The WRF model is suitable for studies that examine different scales of atmospheric phenomena, and can be used in fully compressible and nonhydrostatic conditions.Further descriptions of the WRF model can be found at the website http://www.wrf-model.org/index.php.

Experiment Design
The WRF model was configured with two one-way nests (offline, without feedback) of 3 × 3 km (d 01) and 1 × 1 km (d 02), with a center at (116.6 • E, 39.5 • N).Both nests comprised 108 × 108 grids points.The simulation domain 01 covered most of the Jing-Jin-Ji District.The simulation domain 02 is located in the center of the Jing-Jin-Ji District, which was adjacent to the Xionan New Area.The relevant model parameterizations included the following: num_metgrid_levels was thirty-two and num_metgrid_soil_levels was four; mp_physics used WRF Single-Moment 6 class microphysics scheme (WSM6) [39,40]; cu_physics was off; ra_lw_physics and ra_sw_physics used NCAR Community Atmosphere Model Version 3 (CAM3) [41]; sf_surface_physics used Noah Land Surface Model (LSM) [42].The initial conditions and lateral boundary conditions data were obtained from NCEP Global Final Analysis 6 h data with a horizontal resolution of 1 • × 1 • .We performed the simulations from 08:00 UTC+8 on 17 July 2017, to 08:00 UTC+8 on 1 August 2017, which period includes two weeks and two rainfall events.We chose the temperature and rainfall of the two weeks for further analysis over the inner domain (d 02).The output of results is 1 h a time.
For the 1-km nest, three scenarios were designed: Case full urban land cover (FU), case current urbanization cover (CU), and case no urban cover (NU).In case FU, the area was completed covered by urban areas.In case CU, the area was covered by current land use category.In case NU, all area cover was replaced by grassland, which was the natural land-use type surrounding the urban area in this region.Cases FU, CU, and NU were compared to study the influence of urbanization in this area.Figure 1 illustrates the land-use category and hydrometeorological data distribution in our simulation domain.

Impacts of Urbanization on the Temperature
To conduct a deep analysis of the influence of urbanization on temperature, we choose the mean value of the two-week period (from 17 July to 1 August) for further analysis.And we analyzed the results of d 02, including the following: (1) Daytime temperature contrast among three scenarios, (2) night temperature contrast among three scenarios, (3) temperature difference between day and night, and (4) temperature difference among three scenarios.
(1) Daytime temperature contrast among three scenarios The average air temperature at 2 m above the land surface during the daytime (i.e., from 11:00 to 15:00) was simulated based on the WRF model (Figure 2).Among them, a, b and c indicate the grassland, the current/present suburban underlying surface, and the fully urbanized underlying surface, respectively.
Water 2019, 1, x 5 of 13 1) Daytime temperature contrast among three scenarios The average air temperature at 2 m above the land surface during the daytime (i.e., from 11:00 to 15:00) was simulated based on the WRF model (Figure 2).Among them, a, b and c indicate the grassland, the current/present suburban underlying surface, and the fully urbanized underlying surface, respectively.As shown in Figure 2, the average daytime temperature was between 299 K and 305 K.It is clearly identified that four major regions exist in the research area, including the cold region (298 K~299 K) in the northwest of the map, the light-yellow region (302 K~303 K) in the middle of the map, the orange region (303 K~304 K) in the middle and south of the map, and the red region (304 K~305 K) in the south of the map, respectively.From (a) to (b) and from (b) to (c), as shown in Figure 2, the area between 301 K~303 K decreased gradually, while the areas between 303 K~305 K increased significantly, especially the red area of FU.The results can be concluded that daytime temperatures increased in the study area.In Figure 1, the current urban area and shrublands area is at the top of the figure.Yet in 2a, there are some little warmer temperatures at the top of the figure than in 2b, which suggests that removing the current urban land cover, and replacing it with grass would make the regions warmer somewhere.This may be due to the influence of the surrounding environment, which makes it a certain variation of the temperature in the simulated boundary area.But in general, urbanization increases the temperature of the simulated area.Therefore, compared with NU, the daytime temperature of CU and FU increased, while the daytime temperature of FU increased by a greater extent.In other words, urbanization increased the daytime temperature of Jing-Jin-Ji District.
The order of daytime temperature was NU < CU < FU.The main reasons why urbanization increased the daytime temperature were as follows: (i) With the development of urbanization and the replacement of grassland with urban land, the surface roughness of the whole area increased.Therefore, the wind speed of the urban area decreased as the temperature increased.(ii) Compared with flat grassland, the walls of buildings can absorb and store more heat due to multiple solar reflection and radiation from the urban buildings.(iii) The urban area is covered with a large area of dry impermeable asphalt and concrete surface, which will lead to less heat consumption by evaporation.The grassland has more vegetation for the processes of transpiration and evapotranspiration to consume energy, thus reducing the land surface temperature.Finally, (iv) there are more man-made sources of heat in the city.
2) Night temperature contrast among three scenarios The average night (from 24:00 to 3:00) temperature of the surface at 2 m was simulated based on the WRF model (Figure 3a-c) are the results simulated by NU, CU, and FU, respectively.As shown in Figure 2, the average daytime temperature was between 299 K and 305 K.It is clearly identified that four major regions exist in the research area, including the cold region (298 K~299 K) in the northwest of the map, the light-yellow region (302 K~303 K) in the middle of the map, the orange region (303 K~304 K) in the middle and south of the map, and the red region (304 K~305 K) in the south of the map, respectively.From (a) to (b) and from (b) to (c), as shown in Figure 2, the area between 301 K~303 K decreased gradually, while the areas between 303 K~305 K increased significantly, especially the red area of FU.The results can be concluded that daytime temperatures increased in the study area.In Figure 1, the current urban area and shrublands area is at the top of the figure.Yet in Figure 2a, there are some little warmer temperatures at the top of the figure than in Figure 2b, which suggests that removing the current urban land cover, and replacing it with grass would make the regions warmer somewhere.This may be due to the influence of the surrounding environment, which makes it a certain variation of the temperature in the simulated boundary area.But in general, urbanization increases the temperature of the simulated area.Therefore, compared with NU, the daytime temperature of CU and FU increased, while the daytime temperature of FU increased by a greater extent.In other words, urbanization increased the daytime temperature of Jing-Jin-Ji District.
The order of daytime temperature was NU < CU < FU.The main reasons why urbanization increased the daytime temperature were as follows: (i) With the development of urbanization and the replacement of grassland with urban land, the surface roughness of the whole area increased.Therefore, the wind speed of the urban area decreased as the temperature increased.(ii) Compared with flat grassland, the walls of buildings can absorb and store more heat due to multiple solar reflection and radiation from the urban buildings.(iii) The urban area is covered with a large area of dry impermeable asphalt and concrete surface, which will lead to less heat consumption by evaporation.The grassland has more vegetation for the processes of transpiration and evapotranspiration to consume energy, thus reducing the land surface temperature.Finally, (iv) there are more man-made sources of heat in the city.
(2) Night temperature contrast among three scenarios The average night (from 24:00 to 3:00) temperature of the surface at 2 m was simulated based on the WRF model (Figure 3a-c) are the results simulated by NU, CU, and FU, respectively.From Figure 3, we can see that the average night temperature is between 295 K and 300 K, which is lower than the average daytime temperature.It is clear that three major regions exist in the research area, including the cold region between 295 K~298 K in the northwest of the map, the region between 298 K~299 K in most of the central part of the map, and the sparkly red region between 299 K~300 K.In the three scenarios, the minimum temperature and its range at night were almost unchanged, which were similar to the daytime results.From (a) to (b) and from (b) to (c), as shown in Figure 3, the area between 297 K~298 K decreased gradually, while the red district (294 K~297 K) increased significantly, especially the red area of FU.It shows that urbanization increased the night temperature.The prominent red area in the middle of Figure 3c is most noticeable, and this area indicates that the night temperature of FU increased very remarkably.Compared with NU, the temperature of CU and FU increased, while the temperature of FU increased the most.Therefore, the results mean that the temperature increased gradually from (a) to (c).In other words, with the development of urbanization, the night temperature of Jing-Jin-Ji District increased.This result is because (i) there are many man-made sources of heat in the city; (ii) there are more windshield buildings in the urban area, which decrease the wind speed and then reduce the heat of convective radiation; and (iii) there are more particulate pollutants in the urban atmosphere, which increase the downward atmospheric radiation at night, and form a layer of thermal insulation.
Therefore, compared with NU, the temperature of CU and FU increased, and the temperature of FU increased the most.And it could be concluded that urbanization increased the temperature during the night in Jing-Jin-Ji District.The order of night temperature was NU < CU < FU.
3) Temperature difference between day and night Figure 4 shows the effects of urbanization on the temperature difference between day and night, which is equivalent to the daytime temperature minus the night temperature.It can be seen from Figure 4 that the temperature difference between day and night is between 3 K and 6.5 K, and it is relatively larger in the southern area, where the distribution is the same as the red area in Figure 2. From (a) to (b) and from (b) to (c), as shown in Figure 4, the yellow, orange, and red regions became increasingly larger, which indicated that the temperature difference between day and night increased gradually.It can be concluded that the temperature difference between day and night under different land surfaces at 2 m was NU < CU < FU.Therefore, from (a) to (c), the temperature difference between day and night increased gradually.In other words, with the development of urbanization, the temperature difference between day and night in the center of the Jing-Jin-Ji District increased.According to the conclusions of Figures 2 and 3, both the daytime temperature and the night temperature increased.However, the temperature difference between day and night still increased.Therefore, the main reason for the increase in the temperature difference between day and night is the larger increase in daytime temperature than in night temperature.From Figure 3, we can see that the average night temperature is between 295 K and 300 K, which is lower than the average daytime temperature.It is clear that three major regions exist in the research area, including the cold region between 295 K~298 K in the northwest of the map, the region between 298 K~299 K in most of the central part of the map, and the sparkly red region between 299 K~300 K.In the three scenarios, the minimum temperature and its range at night were almost unchanged, which were similar to the daytime results.From (a) to (b) and from (b) to (c), as shown in Figure 3, the area between 297 K~298 K decreased gradually, while the red district (294 K~297 K) increased significantly, especially the red area of FU.It shows that urbanization increased the night temperature.The prominent red area in the middle of Figure 3c is most noticeable, and this area indicates that the night temperature of FU increased very remarkably.Compared with NU, the temperature of CU and FU increased, while the temperature of FU increased the most.Therefore, the results mean that the temperature increased gradually from (a) to (c).In other words, with the development of urbanization, the night temperature of Jing-Jin-Ji District increased.This result is because (i) there are many man-made sources of heat in the city; (ii) there are more windshield buildings in the urban area, which decrease the wind speed and then reduce the heat of convective radiation; and (iii) there are more particulate pollutants in the urban atmosphere, which increase the downward atmospheric radiation at night, and form a layer of thermal insulation.
Therefore, compared with NU, the temperature of CU and FU increased, and the temperature of FU increased the most.And it could be concluded that urbanization increased the temperature during the night in Jing-Jin-Ji District.The order of night temperature was NU < CU < FU.
(3) Temperature difference between day and night Figure 4 shows the effects of urbanization on the temperature difference between day and night, which is equivalent to the daytime temperature minus the night temperature.It can be seen from Figure 4 that the temperature difference between day and night is between 3 K and 6.5 K, and it is relatively larger in the southern area, where the distribution is the same as the red area in Figure 2. From (a) to (b) and from (b) to (c), as shown in Figure 4, the yellow, orange, and red regions became increasingly larger, which indicated that the temperature difference between day and night increased gradually.It can be concluded that the temperature difference between day and night under different land surfaces at 2 m was NU < CU < FU.Therefore, from (a) to (c), the temperature difference between day and night increased gradually.In other words, with the development of urbanization, the temperature difference between day and night in the center of the Jing-Jin-Ji District increased.According to the conclusions of Figures 2 and 3, both the daytime temperature and the night temperature increased.However, the temperature difference between day and night still increased.Therefore, the main reason for the increase in the temperature difference between day and night is the larger increase in daytime temperature than in night temperature.Compared with the daytime, the night temperature is approximately 4 degrees lower than that in the daytime, and the temperature difference among the three-night scenarios was smaller than that in the daytime.The surface temperature of NU is relatively close to the temperature of the underlying surface of the city, while the temperature of FU is 1 degree higher than that of CU and NU at night.4) Temperature difference among the three scenarios To clearly contrast the effect of urbanization on temperature among these three scenarios, the temperature differences were analyzed among the three scenarios (Figure 5a   Compared with the daytime, the night temperature is approximately 4 degrees lower than that in the daytime, and the temperature difference among the three-night scenarios was smaller than that in the daytime.The surface temperature of NU is relatively close to the temperature of the underlying surface of the city, while the temperature of FU is 1 degree higher than that of CU and NU at night.Compared with the daytime, the night temperature is approximately 4 degrees lower than that in the daytime, and the temperature difference among the three-night scenarios was smaller than that in the daytime.The surface temperature of NU is relatively close to the temperature of the underlying surface of the city, while the temperature of FU is 1 degree higher than that of CU and NU at night.4) Temperature difference among the three scenarios To clearly contrast the effect of urbanization on temperature among these three scenarios, the temperature differences were analyzed among the three scenarios (Figure 5a   From the map, we can see that the mean temperature difference in (a), (b), (c), and (d) are almost all positive values, except for a part of (a).It can be concluded that, whether during daytime or at night, the temperature increased from scenarios (a) to (b) and to (c).In other words, urbanization (NU-CU-FU) increased both daytime temperature and night temperature.Compared with (c) and (d), (a) and (b) had larger temperature differences, which indicated that urbanization more obviously increased daytime temperature.
Compared with (a) and (c), (b) and (d) had a larger temperature difference.This result demonstrated that the progression of urbanization from CU to FU increased the temperature more than did the progression of urbanization from NU to CU.Therefore, this method predicts that the future progression of urbanization in Jing-Jin-Ji District will result in higher temperatures than those seen in the past.

Influence of Urbanization on Rainfall
The comparison of the distribution of total precipitation under the three scenarios of NU, CU, and FU during two weeks (Figure 6).As shown in Figure 6, the total rainfall decreased with the development of urbanization.The precipitation distribution is very uneven in this area.The maximum amount of rainfall can reach more than 60 mm; however, the lowest rainfall region has areas of no rain.The major region of precipitation is concentrated from the northeast to the southwest.
Water 2019, 1, x 8 of 13 Compared with (a) and (c), (b) and (d) had a larger temperature difference.This result demonstrated that the progression of urbanization from CU to FU increased the temperature more than did the progression of urbanization from NU to CU.Therefore, this method predicts that the future progression of urbanization in Jing-Jin-Ji District will result in higher temperatures than those seen in the past.

Influence of Urbanization on Rainfall
The comparison of the distribution of total precipitation under the three scenarios of NU, CU, and FU during two weeks (Figure 6).As shown in Figure 6, the total rainfall decreased with the development of urbanization.The precipitation distribution is very uneven in this area.The maximum amount of rainfall can reach more than 60 mm; however, the lowest rainfall region has areas of no rain.The major region of precipitation is concentrated from the northeast to the southwest.We make comparison diagrams of the peak rainfall of two rainfalls in three scenarios (Figure 7).There are two rainfall events in the two weeks we simulated.One is a heavy rain (20-21 July), the other is light rain (25 July).As shown in Figure 7, both rainfall peaks decreased with the development of urbanization.Urbanization will increase impermeable areas and reduce natural vegetation areas, resulting in a reduction of surface evaporation and the local atmospheric water supply, thereby deepening the boundary layer height and enhancing atmospheric water mixing, which eventually reduces precipitation.Zhang,et al. [43] found that urbanization in Beijing reduced the amount of rainfall.The same results were found in coastal cities in China, including the Pearl River Delta [44], the Yangtze River Delta [45], and the Jing-Jin-Ji District [46].These studies agreed well with these results of ours, and our study is more detailed in a short time scale.We make comparison diagrams of the peak rainfall of two rainfalls in three scenarios (Figure 7).There are two rainfall events in the two weeks we simulated.One is a heavy rain (20-21 July), the other is light rain (25 July).As shown in Figure 7, both rainfall peaks decreased with the development of urbanization.Urbanization will increase impermeable areas and reduce natural vegetation areas, resulting in a reduction of surface evaporation and the local atmospheric water supply, thereby deepening the boundary layer height and enhancing atmospheric water mixing, which eventually reduces precipitation.Zhang,et al. [43] found that urbanization in Beijing reduced the amount of rainfall.The same results were found in coastal cities in China, including the Pearl River Delta [44], the Yangtze River Delta [45], and the Jing-Jin-Ji District [46].These studies agreed well with these results of ours, and our study is more detailed in a short time scale.

Rainfall and Temperature Duration Curves Simulated by the WRF Model
To conduct the consistent the impact of urbanization on precipitation and rainfall, we further analyze the entire two-week simulation period (Figure 8), and the heavier rainfall event for detail (Figure 9).Compared with NU, the mean temperature of CU and FU increased by approximately 0.3 K and 0.6 K, respectively.Compared with NU, the mean precipitation of CU and FU decreased by approximately 6% and 8.4%, respectively.The results showed that the trends of temperature variation and changing precipitation were basically the same in the three situations.The second day temperature was obviously smaller than the average temperature of the first day and the third day.The highest mean temperature was from FU, followed by CU, and finally NU.Therefore, the ordered mean temperature was NU < CU < FU.Similarly, the ordered mean rainfall was NU > CU > FU.
resulting in a reduction of surface evaporation and the local atmospheric water supply, thereby deepening the boundary layer height and enhancing atmospheric water mixing, which eventually reduces precipitation.Zhang,et al. [43] found that urbanization in Beijing reduced the amount of rainfall.The same results were found in coastal cities in China, including the Pearl River Delta [44], the Yangtze River Delta [45], and the Jing-Jin-Ji District [46].These studies agreed well with these results of ours, and our study is more detailed in a short time scale.

Rainfall and Temperature Duration Curves Simulated by the WRF Model
To conduct the consistent the impact of urbanization on precipitation and rainfall, we further analyze the entire two-week simulation period (Figure 8), and the heavier rainfall event for detail (Figure 9).Compared with NU, the mean temperature of CU and FU increased by approximately 0.3 K and 0.6 K, respectively.Compared with NU, the mean precipitation of CU and FU decreased by approximately 6% and 8.4%, respectively.The results showed that the trends of temperature variation and changing precipitation were basically the same in the three situations.The second day temperature was obviously smaller than the average temperature of the first day and the third day.The highest mean temperature was from FU, followed by CU, and finally NU.Therefore, the ordered mean temperature was NU < CU < FU.Similarly, the ordered mean rainfall was NU > CU > FU.Based on the results of the three scenarios, the urbanization impacts on local weather in the Jing-Jin-Ji District increased the temperature and decreased the precipitation.Compared with NU, the mean temperature of CU and FU increased by 0.3 K and 0.6 K, respectively, and the mean precipitation decreased by approximately 6% and 8.4%, respectively.These research findings agreed with the research based on observational data analysis in Beijing.Zheng and Liu [33] used data from 13 meteorological stations in Beijing to analyze the effect of urbanization on surface air temperature and precipitation in the period of 1961-2000, and found that the annual temperatures of the urban and rural stations in the Beijing area obviously increased, and precipitation in the Beijing area

Rainfall and Temperature Duration Curves Simulated by the WRF Model
To conduct the consistent the impact of urbanization on precipitation and rainfall, we further analyze the entire two-week simulation period (Figure 8), and the heavier rainfall event for detail (Figure 9).Compared with NU, the mean temperature of CU and FU increased by approximately 0.3 K and 0.6 K, respectively.Compared with NU, the mean precipitation of CU and FU decreased by approximately 6% and 8.4%, respectively.The results showed that the trends of temperature variation and changing precipitation were basically the same in the three situations.The second day temperature was obviously smaller than the average temperature of the first day and the third day.The highest mean temperature was from FU, followed by CU, and finally NU.Therefore, the ordered mean temperature was NU < CU < FU.Similarly, the ordered mean rainfall was NU > CU > FU.Based on the results of the three scenarios, the urbanization impacts on local weather in the Jing-Jin-Ji District increased the temperature and decreased the precipitation.Compared with NU, the mean temperature of CU and FU increased by 0.3 K and 0.6 K, respectively, and the mean precipitation decreased by approximately 6% and 8.4%, respectively.These research findings agreed with the research based on observational data analysis in Beijing.Zheng and Liu [33] used data from 13 meteorological stations in Beijing to analyze the effect of urbanization on surface air temperature and precipitation in the period of 1961-2000, and found that the annual temperatures of the urban and rural stations in the Beijing area obviously increased, and precipitation in the Beijing area obviously decreased.Based on the results of the three scenarios, the urbanization impacts on local weather in the Jing-Jin-Ji District increased the temperature and decreased the precipitation.Compared with NU, the mean temperature of CU and FU increased by 0.3 K and 0.6 K, respectively, and the mean precipitation decreased by approximately 6% and 8.4%, respectively.These research findings agreed with the research based on observational data analysis in Beijing.Zheng and Liu [33] used data from 13 meteorological stations in Beijing to analyze the effect of urbanization on surface air temperature and precipitation in the period of 1961-2000, and found that the annual temperatures of the urban and rural stations in the Beijing area obviously increased, and precipitation in the Beijing area obviously decreased.
Because the three scenarios have specific meanings, they (from NU to CU and from CU to FU) represent the past impacts of urbanization on weather, and the future impacts of continuous urbanization within the Jing-Jin-Ji District, respectively.Therefore, this study can predict the impact of future urbanization on the regional weather.
We can now summarize the previous analysis and suggest a possible mechanism to explain the local weather responses to changes in land use in the rainfall event.Locally, when the land use changes from 'NU' category to 'CU' and to 'FU', the natural vegetation decreases, while urban and built-up increases substantially, this leads to a decrease in evapotranspiration and air moisture.Ultimately, it causes a rise in surface air temperature and a decrease in precipitation.Liu [47] designed land cover from 'bare or sparsely vegetated' category to 'grassland', and investigated its climatic response and corresponding mechanism.Although the process of experimental design is just the opposite, the mechanism is basically the same as our research.

Model Validation
In this paper, the simulated surface air temperature and precipitation from the CU simulations were compared with observational data to validate the model's ability to simulate the weather variables over the center Jing-Jin-Ji District.The precipitation and temperature data (hourly data) were provided by the National Climate Center of the China Meteorological Administration (http://www.nmic.gov.cn).
The daily observations of the average temperature (T mean ), maximum temperature (T max ), minimum temperature (T min ), and average precipitation (P mean ) were compared with the simulation outputs.The percent bias (PB, %) was calculated by Formula (1).The PB values between the observed meteorological station (OBS) and model-simulated (SIM) data are listed in Table 1.
where PB is the percent bias, %; S i and Q i are the simulated and observed data, respectively.Table 1 shows that the PB of temperature ranged from 3.6% to −5.3%, which represents a very small range.While the PB of precipitation was relatively larger, it was also good enough.Therefore, the WRF model performed well in the study area on the regional and 2-week scales in the CU scenarios in Beijing.Thus, the WRF model can be used to simulate urbanization impacts on weather in Jing-Jin-Ji District effectively.
This work was a preliminary study, and further investigation needs to be conducted.For example, in this study, only the influence of land use on weather was considered.However, the feedback of

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Location of the study area and the land-use category distribution in the model domain.Figure 1. Location of the study area and the land-use category distribution in the model domain.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Location of the study area and the land-use category distribution in the model domain.Figure 1. Location of the study area and the land-use category distribution in the model domain.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Average air temperature (k) at 2 m for different land cover during the daytime.(a) no urban cover (NU), (b) current urbanization cover (CU), and (c) full urban land cover (FU).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Average air temperature (k) at 2 m for different land cover during the daytime.(a) no urban cover (NU), (b) current urbanization cover (CU), and (c) full urban land cover (FU).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4.The temperature (K) difference between day and night under different land surfaces at 2 m. (a), (b), and (c) are NU, CU, and FU, respectively.
,b), and shown in Figure 5 are the daytime temperatures of CU minus NU and FU minus CU, respectively; (c) and (d) shown in Figure 5 are the night temperatures of CU minus NU and FU minus CU, respectively.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The temperature difference between different land during daytime and night.(a) and (b) are CU-NU and FU-CU during the daytime, respectively; (c) and (d) are CU-NU and FU-CU at night, respectively.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4.The temperature (K) difference between day and night under different land surfaces at 2 m. (a-c) are NU, CU, and FU, respectively.

( 4 )
Temperature difference among the three scenarios To clearly contrast the effect of urbanization on temperature among these three scenarios, the temperature differences were analyzed among the three scenarios (Figure 5a,b), and shown in Figure 5 are the daytime temperatures of CU minus NU and FU minus CU, respectively; (c) and (d) shown in Figure 5 are the night temperatures of CU minus NU and FU minus CU, respectively.Water 2019, 1, x 7 of 13

Figure 4 .
Figure 4.The temperature (K) difference between day and night under different land surfaces at 2 m. (a), (b), and (c) are NU, CU, and FU, respectively.
,b), and shown in Figure 5 are the daytime temperatures of CU minus NU and FU minus CU, respectively; (c) and (d) shown in Figure 5 are the night temperatures of CU minus NU and FU minus CU, respectively.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The temperature difference between different land cover during daytime and night.(a) and (b) are CU-NU and FU-CU during the daytime, respectively; (c) and (d) are CU-NU and FU-CU at night, respectively.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The temperature difference between different land cover during daytime and night.(a,b) are CU-NU and FU-CU during the daytime, respectively; (c,d) are CU-NU and FU-CU at night, respectively.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Comparison of total precipitation distribution during two weeks.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(a-c) Comparison of total precipitation distribution during two weeks.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Diagram of mean rainfall and temperature variation with duration during the two weeks.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Diagram of mean rainfall and temperature variation with duration during the heavier rainfall event (20-21 July).

Figure 8 . 13 Figure 7 .
Figure 8. Diagram of mean rainfall and temperature variation with duration during the two weeks.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Diagram of mean rainfall and temperature variation with duration during the two weeks.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Diagram of mean rainfall and temperature variation with duration during the heavier rainfall event (20-21 July).

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Diagram of mean rainfall and temperature variation with duration during the heavier rainfall event (20-21 July).

Table 1 .
The percent bias (PB, %) between the observed meteorological station (OBS) and model-simulated (SIM) data for the average temperature (T mean ), maximum temperature (T max ), minimum temperature (T min ), and average precipitation (P mean ).: The time interval used is from 8 a.m. to 8 a.m. of the next day (the time we used is UTC+8). Note