Key Climate Oscillation Factors Controlling Precipitation Variability during the Dry Season in Eastern Northeast Brazil : Study Case of Munda ú and Para í ba Do Meio River Basins

In Brazil, the northeastern region (NEB) is considered one of the most vulnerable areas of the country in terms of precipitation variability due to frequent drought episodes during the rainy season. Differently from the Northern NEB (NNEB), where dry season is consistently dry, the Eastern NEB (ENEB) exhibits a high interannual variability of precipitation during the dry season, including years exceeding 400 mm. This work aims at understanding key large-scale climate factors that modulate the high pluviometric variability of ENEB during the dry season. Multivariate statistical techniques were applied to identify the time-frequency relationship between precipitation variability and global climate phenomena. The results suggested that hydrological extreme events during the dry season became more frequent after the 1990s. Moreover, our findings also indicated a relationship, at multiannual time scales, between the state of El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and Atlantic Meridional Mode (AMM) and precipitation variability during the dry season. This additional knowledge may contribute to the formation of new perspectives of drought management, leading support to the development of a long-term drought forecasting framework, as well as to the improvement of the water resources management of the region.


Introduction
How large-scale climate variability impacts local hydrology is strategic information regarding the water resources management of a hydrological region, allowing a better understanding of the occurrence of extreme events such as droughts and floods [1,2].Thus, the characterization of local rainfall regimes may improve the short and long-term hydrological prediction, assisting in the formation of a strategic view of unwanted impacts which leads to their mitigation [3][4][5].
The Northeastern region of Brazil (NEB) is the most vulnerable socio-economic area of the country [6,7].It exhibits a very large interannual variability of precipitation [8][9][10] during the rainy season with a high intensity of extreme events such as the drought from 2012 to 2016 [11] and the 2010 flood episodes [12].These extreme events are normally associated with large-scale climate phenomena such as ENSO [13][14][15] and/or anomalous position or intensity of the Intertropical Convergence Zone-ITCZ due to sea surface temperature (SST) variabilities in the tropical Atlantic Ocean [8,16,17].The NEB is exposed to different spatial-temporal rainfall regimes throughout the year.Precipitation at the Northern NEB (NNEB) is characterized by a rainy season from January to May marked by expressive interannual variability [8,16,18,19], and a dry season from June to December characterized by very low amounts of precipitation (near zero).On the other hand, Eastern NEB (ENEB) has the highest annual average precipitation of the NEB, with a wet season from March to August, is also susceptible to annual variations [20,21], but in a different way than the NNEB, while the ENEB dry season might receive substantial amount of precipitation in some years.
Many studies have been conducted in order to analyze and characterize such interannual variability of precipitation in NEB, which, however, were predominantly focused on NNEB rainy season [8,10,17,[22][23][24][25][26].There is also a growing interest in understanding the dynamics of the precipitation variability over the ENEB [18,20,[27][28][29][30].However, most of these are focused on the rainy season of the region, its relationship with Atlantic SST patterns and the occurrence of easterly wave disturbance over the tropical Atlantic [18,19,31].Nevertheless, the dry season in the ENEB may also exhibit high variabilities in terms of volume precipitated, as seen recently (e.g., 96 mm was precipitated in 2016-2017, and more than 400 mm in 2017-2018), and low-rainfall indices during the dry season of this region may directly impact basic economic activities (i.e., mainly rainfed agriculture) and water supply security.
The spatio-temporal evolution of drought episodes during the dry season in the ENEB was recently studied by Costa et al. [29].However, important knowledge gaps regarding temporal variability of large-scale climate phenomena influencing the dry season in the ENEB still remain.The non-stationarity of the relationship between global climate indicators and the precipitation over the ENEB during the rainy season may also be a key factor that controls the amount of rainfall received during the dry season.It may also provide an understanding of periodicity patterns, such as the interannual-to-multiannual precipitation dynamics during this season.Therefore, this study aims to analyze the role of large-scale climate phenomena played in the temporal dependency of precipitation variability during the dry season in the ENEB using a time-frequency analysis, such as wavelet techniques, which is applied in the formation of a case study consisting of two representative river basins which exist in the central parts of ENEB.The knowledge achieved in this study may be a promising step towards drought management tools, such as a long-term drought forecasting system, contributing to the water resources management of the region.

Study Area
The study area consists of two neighboring river basins in the central ENEB (8 • 30 00" S to 10 • 00 00" S latitude and 35 • 30 00" W to 37 • 00 00" W longitude), the Mundaú river basin (4126 km 2 ) and the Paraíba do Meio river basin (3157 km 2 ), which together covers an area of 7283 km 2 (Figure 1).This study area is the same as the one described by Costa et al. [29], an area with large variation in climate and physiographic properties from the littoral (humid climate with tropical forest), to the headwaters (semiarid region).The semiarid part of the basins exhibits an average annual precipitation of c.a. 800 mm, while the coastal zone, c.a. 2000 mm [32].As usual in tropical areas, the annual precipitation regime is basically divided in two seasons, a dry season between September and February, and a wet season from March to August, concentrating 70% of the total annual precipitation.The driest period includes October, November and December, which on average explain only 8% of the annual rainfall; however, the dry season is also marked by a high interannual variability of precipitation, including years exceeding 400 mm. Figure 2 shows the average annual regime of precipitation of the study area.[29].The climate classification (shades) is in accordance with [33].
The spatial-temporal features of the rainfall regime of these basins are characteristic of the ENEB, as described by Rao et al. [20], with the rainy season explaining 60% of the annual precipitation while the dry season only 10%.Thus, even though the study area is small compared to the ENEB area, it might represent the climate of the central part of the ENEB.[29].The climate classification (shades) is in accordance with [33].
The spatial-temporal features of the rainfall regime of these basins are characteristic of the ENEB, as described by Rao et al. [20], with the rainy season explaining 60% of the annual precipitation while the dry season only 10%.Thus, even though the study area is small compared to the ENEB area, it might represent the climate of the central part of the ENEB.The spatial-temporal features of the rainfall regime of these basins are characteristic of the ENEB, as described by Rao et al. [20], with the rainy season explaining 60% of the annual precipitation while the dry season only 10%.Thus, even though the study area is small compared to the ENEB area, it might represent the climate of the central part of the ENEB.

Data
The data collection and quality control analysis (e.g., data quality check and missing data fill) used here was used in [29].It is composed by daily data from 1938 to 2008 with 18 precipitation stations (Figure 1b), where 10 stations belong to the Brazilian National Water Agency (ANA) and 8 stations to Pernambuco State Technology Institute (ITEP).The time series of the accumulated precipitation for the driest trimester (October to December-OND) were obtained from the daily data series.

Standard Precipitation Index-SPI
The accumulated precipitation OND from 1938 to 2008 was used to obtain the 3-months Standard Precipitation Index (SPI-3 OND ).The SPI is a useful technique in measuring rainfall anomalies, indicating drought/wet intensity over a period [39,40].In this study, the SPI values were calculated for the driest trimester of the study area.Table 1 shows the SPI classification.Adapted from [40].
A filtering was performed on the SPI values proposed by Agnew [40].The values were standardized by the value of the normal category, defined as 0.84, and a new variable called SPI3* was calculated.Absolute values below 0.84 were assigned as zero value, and absolute values above 0.84 were diminished by 0.84.

Wavelet Analysis
To evaluate the temporal variability between SPI3* and lagged climate indices, a time-frequency analysis was performed by using wavelet techniques.Wavelet is a more powerful method to analyze nonstationary series compared to other techniques such as Fourier analysis [41][42][43].The continuous wavelet transform (CWT) allows for the investigation of time series at a different scale of periodicity, highlighting dominant modes of variability over the time scale with statistical level of significance [44][45][46].The CWT of a time series X may be defined as: where t is the time and Ψ s is the mother wavelet at the scale s.The Morlet mother wavelet is widely used in geophysical signal analysis [45][46][47], and its equation is defined as: where, η and ω s are time and frequency respectively, both non-dimensional.Cross wavelet analysis (XWT) was also applied to evaluate the covariance of two variables (X and Y), leading to the identification of periods with high common power between SPI3* and climate indices in their time-frequency domain [41,45], and to improving the understanding of occurrences of temporal cycles in the SPI3* time series linked with global climate phenomena.The XWT spectrum is defined by: where * denotes the complex conjugate of W Y (s, t).In addition, wavelet coherence (WTC) was applied to measure the intensity of the common power.The WTC is defined as the square of the smoothed cross-spectrum, normalized by smoothed spectra of two time series, and may be interpreted as a local correlation (R) over the time-frequency domain, i.e., it yields the quantity between 0 and 1 in their time-frequency space [45].The WTC is presented as: where S is the smoothing operator [46,47].The WTC enhances the reliability of the time-frequency analysis, signaling the case of local variable correlation while avoiding pitfalls created by strong CWT signal of one of the time series [42].
All calculations were performed using the MATLAB ® software suite.The output maps were produced in ArcGIS ® 10.2.The CWT was computed using the software provided by Torrence and Compo [45] (http://atoc.colorado.edu/research/wavelets/),while the Cross Wavelets and Wavelet Coherence Analysis was computed using a software package provided by Jevrejeva et al. [41], at the URL: http://www.pol.ac.uk/home/research/waveletcoherence/.

Variability Patterns of Precipitation in ENEB
To represent the overall variance of the OND precipitation, Ref. [29] have applied cluster analysis on the precipitation data after filtering them by means of Principal Component Analysis (PCA), preserving 75% of the original data variability.Their results pointed to two sub-regions of homogeneous precipitation variability (HG1 and HG2) which are presented in Figure 1b and are used in this work.
The CWT analysis for each Homogeneous Group (HG) shows the periodicity patterns of the SPI3* time series (Figure 3).For HG1, the CWT displayed high power with statistical significance mainly in low frequencies (10-to 16-year period) in the 1950s to 1980s period (Figure 3a).Significant power in high frequencies (2-to 5-year period) is also noticed in the 1980s to 2000s period.
The CWT for HG2 shows higher power in low frequency (10-to 15-year period) in the 1960s to 1990s period; however, this signal is not statistically significant (Figure 4a).Power spectrum with statistical significance can only be seen at a 6-to 8-year period during the 1990s.
Analyzing the SPI3* time series for HG1 (Figure 3b dashed line), it is possible to notice a remarkable periodicity of dry and wet cycles with a multiannual time scale.We have found cycles of around 15 years from 1947 to 1976, and cycles with higher magnitudes around 7-8 years from 1986, indicating an increase on the frequency of hydrological extreme events, mainly drought episodes.Indeed, these multiannual cycles have a high correspondence with the periodicity patterns found in Figure 3a, which clearly show cycles around 15 years before 1980s and a tendency of interannual periodicity after the 1980s.On the other hand, it was not possible to identify an interannual-to-multiannual dominant time scale of the SPI3* for HG2 (Figure 4b dashed line).In this case, the SPI3* time series clearly show two distinguished cycles, a wetter multidecadal cycle from 1938 to 1977, when it changed to a drier one from 1977 to 2008, and with higher frequency.The lack of a significant power signal in low frequencies for HG2 (Figure 4a) may be explained by this multidecadal pattern observed in Figure 4b, where the size of the SPI3* time series obstructed the CWT from revealing periodicity signals lower than around 16-year period.This multidecadal cycle is coincident with PDO patterns, as described by Mantua et al. [35] and Lucena et al. [48].These authors highlighted that the PDO had a phase changed from negative to positive values after 1970s, with direct impact on the occurrence of El Niño episodes, which is a well-known climate phenomena affecting the precipitation regime over the semiarid NEB [8,10,13,24,49].Da Silva et al. [11] also suggested a possible influence of PDO on the variability of the rainy season of this region before and after the 1970s.Djebou [50] noticed similar patterns of increasing drought frequency in a watershed in the USA after the 1980s; however explaining that such changes does not necessarily mean dryer climatology, but may also result from interactions of global-scale and local scale phenomena [51], which could also account the regional differences found in our results between HG1 and HG2.On the other hand, it was not possible to identify an interannual-to-multiannual dominant time scale of the SPI3* for HG2 (Figure 4b dashed line).In this case, the SPI3* time series clearly show two distinguished cycles, a wetter multidecadal cycle from 1938 to 1977, when it changed to a drier one from 1977 to 2008, and with higher frequency.The lack of a significant power signal in low frequencies for HG2 (Figure 4a) may be explained by this multidecadal pattern observed in Figure 4b, where the size of the SPI3* time series obstructed the CWT from revealing periodicity signals lower than around 16-year period.This multidecadal cycle is coincident with PDO patterns, as described by Mantua et al. [35] and Lucena et al. [48].These authors highlighted that the PDO had a phase changed from negative to positive values after 1970s, with direct impact on the occurrence of El Niño episodes, which is a well-known climate phenomena affecting the precipitation regime over the semiarid NEB [8,10,13,24,49].Da Silva et al. [11] also suggested a possible influence of PDO on the variability of the rainy season of this region before and after the 1970s.Djebou [50] noticed similar patterns of increasing drought frequency in a watershed in the USA after the 1980s; however explaining that such changes does not necessarily mean dryer climatology, but may also result from interactions of global-scale and local scale phenomena [51], which could also account the regional differences found in our results between HG1 and HG2.

Effect of Large-Scale Climate Oscillation on ENEB Precipitation Variability
The XWT analysis revealed that the periodicity patterns of AMM-wind and SOI in April (i.e., 6 months before the dry season) influence the precipitation variability in both HG1 and HG2 (Figures 5 and 6, right column respectively).This is shown by the significant high common power, predominantly in low frequencies (10-to 15-year period), from the 1960s to the 1990s in HG1 and mid-1960s to 2000 in HG2.A significant common power at high frequencies (2-to 5-year period) was also found for both HGs, but only from the 1980s to the 1990s.In addition, the local correlation, represented by the WTC power spectrum, confirms that high coherence values occur mainly at low frequencies (Figures 5 and 6, left column, respectively).The effect of Niño 3.4 on precipitation variability of the HGs, is similar, in general, to the one of SOI in April.However, a significant relationship was only found for HG2 (Figure 6), accompanied by a slight reduction on the significant area of the diagram of common power/local correlation at both low and high frequencies, which may suggest that the SOI index is a better indicator of the influence of ENSO over the study area.
These results suggest that the state of both Atlantic and Pacific oceans can influence precipitation variability during the dry season in ENEB.The interannual-to-decadal variability of the AMM phase is directly associated with the ITCZ position over the tropical Atlantic [38], and hence with the variations in the rainy season of the NEB ( [8,24], among many others).Our results also showed a possible influence of the AMM phase over the dry season of the region at multiannual time scale.Such influence was mainly noticed in the wind component of AMM in April than the SST component.Chiang and Vimont [38] observed that wind variance reaches its peak around the boreal spring (austral autumn, i.e., around April), and that there is a lag correlation of one month between wind and SST, where the wind may drive the SST variabilities.Our results also are in accordance with [13],

Effect of Large-Scale Climate Oscillation on ENEB Precipitation Variability
The XWT analysis revealed that the periodicity patterns of AMM-wind and SOI in April (i.e., 6 months before the dry season) influence the precipitation variability in both HG1 and HG2 (Figures 5  and 6, right column respectively).This is shown by the significant high common power, predominantly in low frequencies (10-to 15-year period), from the 1960s to the 1990s in HG1 and mid-1960s to 2000 in HG2.A significant common power at high frequencies (2-to 5-year period) was also found for both HGs, but only from the 1980s to the 1990s.In addition, the local correlation, represented by the WTC power spectrum, confirms that high coherence values occur mainly at low frequencies (Figures 5 and 6, left column, respectively).The effect of Niño 3.4 on precipitation variability of the HGs, is similar, in general, to the one of SOI in April.However, a significant relationship was only found for HG2 (Figure 6), accompanied by a slight reduction on the significant area of the diagram of common power/local correlation at both low and high frequencies, which may suggest that the SOI index is a better indicator of the influence of ENSO over the study area.
These results suggest that the state of both Atlantic and Pacific oceans can influence precipitation variability during the dry season in ENEB.The interannual-to-decadal variability of the AMM phase is directly associated with the ITCZ position over the tropical Atlantic [38], and hence with the variations in the rainy season of the NEB ( [8,24], among many others).Our results also showed a possible influence of the AMM phase over the dry season of the region at multiannual time scale.Such influence was mainly noticed in the wind component of AMM in April than the SST component.Chiang and Vimont [38] observed that wind variance reaches its peak around the boreal spring (austral autumn, i.e., around April), and that there is a lag correlation of one month between wind and SST, where the wind may drive the SST variabilities.Our results also are in accordance with [13], which suggested that in the northern tropical Atlantic the trade winds precede the tropical basin wide SST anomalies.Therefore, the interannual-to-decadal variability of the AMM_wind seems to play an important role in modulating the SST conditions in the southern tropical Atlantic and consequently in the formation of drier or wetter periods during the dry season in ENEB.
Water 2018, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 13 which suggested that in the northern tropical Atlantic the trade winds precede the tropical basin wide SST anomalies.Therefore, the interannual-to-decadal variability of the AMM_wind seems to play an important role in modulating the SST conditions in the southern tropical Atlantic and consequently in the formation of drier or wetter periods during the dry season in ENEB.ENSO episodes are also frequently associated with drought/rainy years over NEB [8,10,13,24,49].Tedeschi et al. [52] showed that different types of ENSO (East or Central ENSO) together with its phase (El Niño or La Nina years) have different impacts in the rainy season of the NEB during the austral autumn and winter.However, as the ENSO phase might persist for a year or more, its effects may also be seen during the austral spring and summer, which agrees with our results, considering the periodicity pattern of the SOI index mainly at multiannual time scale.Tedeschi et al. [53] also studied the influence of ENSO during the austral spring and summer in South America, but their findings revealed a higher influence of ENSO in central and southern Brazil, when it is the rainy season of those regions.Nevertheless, they also pointed out that during the occurrence of Central ENSO episodes are also frequently associated with drought/rainy years over NEB [8,10,13,24,49].Tedeschi et al. [52] showed that different types of ENSO (East or Central ENSO) together with its phase (El Niño or La Nina years) have different impacts in the rainy season of the NEB during the austral autumn and winter.However, as the ENSO phase might persist for a year or more, its effects may also be seen during the austral spring and summer, which agrees with our results, considering the periodicity pattern of the SOI index mainly at multiannual time scale.Tedeschi et al. [53] also studied the influence of ENSO during the austral spring and summer in South America, but their findings revealed a higher influence of ENSO in central and southern Brazil, when it is the rainy season of those regions.Nevertheless, they also pointed out that during the occurrence of Central ENSO episodes, the rainfall over tropical South America may also be affected, suggesting that ENSO might also have a long-term relationship with drier or wetter years during the dry season in ENEB.
Water 2018, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 13 ENSO episodes, the rainfall over tropical South America may also be affected, suggesting that ENSO might also have a long-term relationship with drier or wetter years during the dry season in ENEB.The time-frequency analysis also indicated that the NAO index may influence SPI3* in HG1.The XWT analysis (Figure 5, right column) shows that SPI3* and NAO have significant common power mainly in low frequencies (10-to 16-year period) from the 1950s to the 2000s.A common power in high frequencies is only noticed during a short period from the 1980s to the 1990s at a 2-to 4-year period.However, the WTC spectrum (Figure 5, left column) depicts a highly significant local correlation only between the 1980s to the mid-1990s (10-to 12-year period).The NAO phase is strongly related to the interannual variability of the Northern Hemispheric, such as in droughts and floods [54,55].However, studies have also suggested that the NAO may remotely influence the SST conditions in the tropical Atlantic [56][57][58], with evidence of anomalies during the rainy season of the NEB [59].
Lucena et al. [48] suggested that the climate in the NNEB is subject to low frequencies variability influenced by the Northern Atlantic, but also clarify that after 1970s both NAO and PDO presented a long-term change on their phases, resulting in more extreme events in the NEB, but also inhibiting their indirect influence in the NNEB.Our results also indicated a remarkable change in SPI3* values The time-frequency analysis also indicated that the NAO index may influence SPI3* in HG1.The XWT analysis (Figure 5, right column) shows that SPI3* and NAO have significant common power mainly in low frequencies (10-to 16-year period) from the 1950s to the 2000s.A common power in high frequencies is only noticed during a short period from the 1980s to the 1990s at a 2-to 4-year period.However, the WTC spectrum (Figure 5, left column) depicts a highly significant local correlation only between the 1980s to the mid-1990s (10-to 12-year period).The NAO phase is strongly related to the interannual variability of the Northern Hemispheric, such as in droughts and floods [54,55].However, studies have also suggested that the NAO may remotely influence the SST conditions in the tropical Atlantic [56][57][58], with evidence of anomalies during the rainy season of the NEB [59].
Lucena et al. [48] suggested that the climate in the NNEB is subject to low frequencies variability influenced by the Northern Atlantic, but also clarify that after 1970s both NAO and PDO presented a long-term change on their phases, resulting in more extreme events in the NEB, but also inhibiting their indirect influence in the NNEB.Our results also indicated a remarkable change in SPI3* values after the 1970s for HG1, which also presented higher peaks (Figure 3b) in comparison with HG2, and a significant local correlation of WTC coherence spectrum between NAO and SPI3* (Figure 5, left column).
The absence of an XWT/WTC power signal between NAO and SPI3* at HG2 might be related with the inhibition suggested by Lucena et al. [48], caused by the PDO-NAO signal changes, since HG2 is mostly inserted in the semiarid region, close to the NNEB region.Moreover, SPI3* time series present cycles coincident with the PDO patterns, as discussed before and showed in Figure 4b.In general, it seems that the NAO might have a secondary role in precipitation variability during the dry season in the ENEB as previously suggested by Costa et al. [29] by means of an interhemispheric connection [5,38,51,56].

Conclusions
Global climate phenomena play an important role over the rainy season variability of ENEB [18,19,30,31].However, this work has also shown that the periodicity modes of precipitation during the dry season in the ENEB, or more specifically in its central parts, is also affected by large-scale climate factors.
Cycles of variability were identified, mainly in a multiannual scale, underlining a temporal dependency related to the state of the Pacific and Atlantic oceans.Such temporal dependency suggests a long-term effect of both ocean's conditions over the dry season of the region with periodicity modes of 12-to 15-year duration.Moreover, our results indicated that the states of both ENSO and AMM seems to be potential indicators in predicting precipitation anomalies during the dry season over the ENEB.The effect of the NAO on precipitation variability during the dry season was not too clear, but its anomaly might be linked to the increase of frequency of extreme events in the HG1 after the 1980s.On the other hand, it may be acting in the opposite way in the semiarid region [48].Therefore, further investigation is needed to reveal the role of the NAO in the precipitation variability of ENEB.
A remarkable multidecadal pattern was also observed in the precipitation time series during the dry season of the ENEB, although no strong signal was captured by wavelet analysis with indices such as PDO and AMO.The size of the precipitation time series probably creates a limitation on catching low-frequency signals beyond the 16-year period.However, such multidecadal cycles of around 20 years, mainly for the semiarid region, are similar to the PDO variations [35,48], which may indicate an influence of the PDO on precipitation variability during the dry season in the ENEB.
In general, this work may contribute to the improving of the understanding of how climate variability may impact precipitation during dry season in the ENEB.The study area has a high dependency of precipitation conditions throughout the year, with direct effects over basic activities developed in the ENEB (e.g., rainfed agriculture and livestock activities).Thus, a better comprehension of interactions between global climate oscillations and local precipitation regime may lead to new perspectives in drought management.Besides that, the results also showed the possibility of developing a long-term forecasting system, which might support decision-making on water resources management, avoiding conflicts and reducing socio-economic losses caused by droughts.
the international cooperation among Lund University and Federal University of Alagoas, and partially financed C. B. Uvo.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.(a) the different precipitation regions of NEB (NNEB-medium gray, ENEB-light gray and SNEB-dark gray) and the overview location of the study area in NEB and Brazil (adapted from [21]).(b) the study area (Paraíba do Meio and Mundaú river basins) with the precipitation homogeneous regions adapted from[29].The climate classification (shades) is in accordance with[33].

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Monthly average precipitation (from 1938 to 2008) over the study area from the 18 selected precipitation stations with the degree of dispersion.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.(a) the different precipitation regions of NEB (NNEB-medium gray, ENEB-light gray and SNEB-dark gray) and the overview location of the study area in NEB and Brazil (adapted from [21]).(b) the study area (Paraíba do Meio and Mundaú river basins) with the precipitation homogeneous regions adapted from[29].The climate classification (shades) is in accordance with[33].

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.(a) the different precipitation regions of NEB (NNEB-medium gray, ENEB-light gray and SNEB-dark gray) and the overview location of the study area in NEB and Brazil (adapted from [21]).(b) the study area (Paraíba do Meio and Mundaú river basins) with the precipitation homogeneous regions adapted from[29].The climate classification (shades) is in accordance with[33].

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Monthly average precipitation (from 1938 to 2008) over the study area from the 18 selected precipitation stations with the degree of dispersion.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Monthly average precipitation (from 1938 to 2008) over the study area from the 18 selected precipitation stations with the degree of dispersion.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. (a) Continuous wavelet power spectrum from SPI3* at HG1.The thick black contours highlight the 95% of confidence level.(b) SPI3* time series for HG1 with the temporal cycle of variability.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. (a) Continuous wavelet power spectrum from SPI3* at HG1.The thick black contours highlight the 95% of confidence level.(b) SPI3* time series for HG1 with the temporal cycle of variability.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Wavelet Coherence (left column) and Cross Wavelet Transform (right column) between climate indices and SPI3* at HG1 from 1938 to 2008 (except AMM, from 1950 to 2008).The thick black contours represent 95% of confidence level.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Wavelet Coherence (left column) and Cross Wavelet Transform (right column) between climate indices and SPI3* at HG1 from 1938 to 2008 (except AMM, from 1950 to 2008).The thick black contours represent 95% of confidence level.

Table 1 .
Drought categorization based on SPI index.