Comprehensive Analysis of Organic Micropollutants in Fine Particulate Matter in Hanoi Metropolitan Area, Vietnam

: Rapid urbanization has led to increased environmental pollution in Vietnam, especially air pollution issues. In this study, we used gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with an automated identiﬁcation and quantiﬁcation system database to detect and quantitate compounds in atmospheric ﬁne particulate matter (PM 2.5 ). A total of 288 compounds classiﬁed in 19 pollutant categories based on their origins were detected in PM 2.5 samples collected in three areas of Hanoi during winter. The total content of substances detected ranged from 41.08 to 795.00 ng.m − 3 . The characteristics and concentrations of organic pollutants differed among the industrial, urban, and agricultural sampling areas, with average concentrations of 179.00, 112.10, and 529.40 ng.m − 3 , respectively. In this comprehensive study on trace organic compounds conducted with samples collected at three sites, we investigating the basic impact of three main factors on the environment. This study contributes to the literature by providing a data set on the content of trace organic substances in the air at the study site.


Introduction
Due to rapid urbanization, industrial development and population increase in big cities in Vietnam, air pollution has become an alarming environmental issue in Hanoi, the capital city.Fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) is a notable and widespread air pollutant in Hanoi [1][2][3].Several diseases are associated with PM 2.5 pollution, for instance, asthma, lung cancer, and heart disease.PM 2.5 is more dangerous than larger particles in terms of long-term human health effects, as smaller particles can penetrate deeper into the respiratory tract.PM 2.5 is generated by a wide range of natural and anthropogenic emission sources, which contribute to the high heterogeneity and complexity of the physicochemical properties of PM 2.5 .PM 2.5 sources include fossil fuel combustion, construction, mining, cement and ceramic manufacturing, and other industrial activities [3,4].A rapid increase in the use of private transport, such as motorcycles and cars, has been a substantial contributor to PM 2.5 pollution in Hanoi.Agricultural activities represent another major contributor to PM 2.5 air pollution in the region [3,5,6] In addition to the harmful effects caused by the physical properties of PM 2.5 , there is potential for toxicity from chemicals present in the particles.PM 2.5 comprises various chemical compounds, both inorganic and organic, which originate from different sources, including natural and human activities [7][8][9][10][11].Because organic pollutants may persist in the environment for a long time, there is an increased to human health with exposure.Therefore, researchers have been concerned with identifying and quantifying organic components in PM 2.5 [9,12]

Sample Collection and Extraction
Thirty fine particulate matter air samples were collected at 3 locations in Hanoi in January 2021 (dry season) (Figure 1).At each location, 10 samples were collected, representing 10 consecutive days.Samples were collected for 10 h from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.Samples were coded in order of collection and sampling location.Samples PN1-PN10 were collected at one location (20 • 57 04.6 N, 106 • 01 24.3 E), i.e., Pho Noi (PN) industrial zone, approximately 24 km from the center of Hanoi.TH1-TH10 (21 • 03 57.9 N, 105 • 49 22.1 E) were collected in Quang Ba ward, Tay Ho (TH) District, where numerous agricultural activities occur, including a large flower market.Samples CG1-CG10 (21 • 02 12.0 N, 105 • 47 01.6 E) were collected in Cau Giay (CG) District, an urban district of the city with excessive traffic and population density.A high-volume air sampler (Shibata HV-500R, Japan) with cutoff PM 2.5 was used for sample collection at an average flow rate of 6 m 3 /h [20].The quartz fiber filters was baked at 550 • C for 6h and then stored in a desiccator (48h at a temperature of 25 ± 2 • C and relative humidity of 50 ± 4%) before use.The filters were weighed before and after sampling under the same conditions.After weighting, each filter was wrapped in aluminum foil, kept in a polypropylene bag, and stored at −20 • C until extraction.
The PM 2.5 concentration in Hanoi is much higher in the winter months than in the summer months.This trend is attributed to the influences of monsoons, nocturnal radiation inversions, and subsidence temperature inversions [4].In the winter months, the northeast monsoon carries PM 2.5 dust into Hanoi.In addition, in winter, humidity is low, and radiative heat is low in daytime and nighttime, limiting the dispersion of PM 2.5 into the atmosphere.On the contrary, in summer, the daytime and nighttime radiative heat create ideal conditions for dust particles to easily disperse into the atmosphere.Rains also clear the air of accumulated PM 2.5 in the summer months.These seasonal fluctuations are the main causes leading to variations in PM 2.5 content in Hanoi.Duong et al. [6] compared 107 insecticides in atmospheric particulate matter between dry and rainy seasons and identified 19 compounds in samples from both seasons.The study reported higher pesticide concentrations in the dry season.Therefore, to assess the level of organic pollution in PM 2.5 , winter was chosen as the sampling time in this study.
radiation inversions, and subsidence temperature inversions [4].In the winter months, the northeast monsoon carries PM2.5 dust into Hanoi.In addition, in winter, humidity is low, and radiative heat is low in daytime and nighttime, limiting the dispersion of PM2.5 into the atmosphere.On the contrary, in summer, the daytime and nighttime radiative heat create ideal conditions for dust particles to easily disperse into the atmosphere.Rains also clear the air of accumulated PM2.5 in the summer months.These seasonal fluctuations are the main causes leading to variations in PM2.5 content in Hanoi.Duong et al. [6] compared 107 insecticides in atmospheric particulate matter between dry and rainy seasons and identified 19 compounds in samples from both seasons.The study reported higher pesticide concentrations in the dry season.Therefore, to assess the level of organic pollution in PM2.5, winter was chosen as the sampling time in this study.The samples were extracted by following the method described in the previous study with modifications.In brief, half of the filter from the high-volume air sampler was cut into small pieces, placed in a dark tube, and added to the surrogate.The pieces were extracted with 40 mL hexane:acetone (1:1 v:v) (Merck) in a sonication bath at room temperature for 20 min before centrifuging at 2500 rpm/min for 10 min.The supernatant was transferred into a flask, and the pellet was re-extracted two more times by the same procedure.Then, the extract solutions were combined and concentrated by rotary evaporation to 2 mL and transferred to a tube to evaporate to 0.4 mL utilizing a gentle nitrogen stream.The residue was mixed with 1 μg of IS and brought to a volume of 1 mL with hexane.The IS with exact concentration was added so that the calibration curve could be used with the IS-based method already registered in the AIQS-DB.

Targeted Analysis of the Air Particulate Samples
Quantitation of the targeted compounds in each sample was conducted using a GC-MS-TQ8040 system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) in full scan mode and selected ion mode (SIM) equipped with an AIQS-DB, which was described in previous studies (Table S4).A DB-5MS Ultra Inert column (30 m length × 0.25 mm internal diameter × 0.25 μm film thickness, Agilent Technologies) was used in this study.The injector temperature was 250 °C with helium carrier gas at a linear velocity of 40 cm/s.The temperature of the interface between MS and GC was 300 °C, and the ion source was set to 200 °C.The column oven temperature was set to 40 °C, held for 2 min, and increased to 310 °C (8 °C/min, held for The samples were extracted by following the method described in the previous study with modifications.In brief, half of the filter from the high-volume air sampler was cut into small pieces, placed in a dark tube, and added to the surrogate.The pieces were extracted with 40 mL hexane:acetone (1:1 v:v) (Merck) in a sonication bath at room temperature for 20 min before centrifuging at 2500 rpm/min for 10 min.The supernatant was transferred into a flask, and the pellet was re-extracted two more times by the same procedure.Then, the extract solutions were combined and concentrated by rotary evaporation to 2 mL and transferred to a tube to evaporate to 0.4 mL utilizing a gentle nitrogen stream.The residue was mixed with 1 µg of IS and brought to a volume of 1 mL with hexane.The IS with exact concentration was added so that the calibration curve could be used with the IS-based method already registered in the AIQS-DB.

Targeted Analysis of the Air Particulate Samples
Quantitation of the targeted compounds in each sample was conducted using a GC-MS-TQ8040 system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) in full scan mode and selected ion mode (SIM) equipped with an AIQS-DB, which was described in previous studies (Table S4).A DB-5MS Ultra Inert column (30 m length × 0.25 mm internal diameter × 0.25 µm film thickness, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used in this study.The injector temperature was 250 • C with helium carrier gas at a linear velocity of 40 cm/s.The temperature of the interface between MS and GC was 300 • C, and the ion source was set to 200 • C. The column oven temperature was set to 40 • C, held for 2 min, and increased to 310 • C (8 • C/min, held for 5 min).One microliter of each concentration was injected into the gas chromatograph in splitless mode.The method detection limits (MDsLs) for the substances were estimated based on the instrument detection limit (IDL) in full scan mode as shown in the previous studies.The organic compounds were validated if the retention times and mass fractions matched the data specified in the system and quantified using standard curve data in AIQS-DB.

Quality Control
Quality control was conducted by blank and surrogate recovery analysis.Blank samples were processed every five samples for cross verification.Blank concentrations were subtracted from the sample concentrations in the reported data.The accuracy of the method was confirmed by examining the recoveries of 21 surrogates (deuterium-labelled IS), which were spiked to the blank and PM 2.5 samples and had the same range of broad physicochemical properties as targeted compounds.The recoveries of the 21 surrogates ranged from 80.5% to 121.5% (Table S5).Relative standard deviations of 21 surrogates were below 20%, which clarified that sample analyses were acceptably precise.

Meteorological Data
In this study, we collected Hanoi weather data during the sample period from the Weather Underground website (https://www.wunderground.comaccessed on 1 February 2021) for Noi Bai airport, which is located approximately 30 km from the sampling location.Hourly data collected for the study site in January 2021 include temperature, humidity, and wind speed.Pooled data for this study were averaged from the data collected during the sampling period from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.The average results for the day were used to assess the relationship between PM 2.5 levels and climatic factors (Table S3).

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was processed using Microsoft Excel 2010.Single-factor ANOVA was used to determine the differences in concentrations between samples.

Concentrations of PM 2.5 and Correlations with Meteorogical Variables
Figure 2 shows the daytime average concentration of PM 2.5 and meteorological conditions measured at the sampling location in Hanoi in January 2021.Most of the daytime average concentrations of PM 2.5 (Table S3) in the month exceeded the allowable limit of PM 2.5 content in Vietnam (50 µg.m −3 ), and all results were higher than the level allowed by WHO guidelines [21].Meteorological parameters such as temperature, air humidity, and wind speed vary from day to day with large differences.It can be easily seen that in January, there are two northeast monsoons affecting the sampling location between the 5th and 8th and between the 16th and 19th, causing a sharp drop in the average daytime temperature, whereas the temperature is stable on the remaining days.There were moderately positive correlations between mean daytime temperature and PM 2.5 concentration (R = 0.66), showing that high-temperature days have higher PM 2.5 concentrations than low-temperature days.Similarly, there was an average positive correlation between humidity and mean daytime PM 2.5 concentration (R = 0.46), showing that the humidity of the air also partly affects the condensation of PM 2.5 in the air [22].In contrast, there were moderately negative correlations between mean daytime PM 2.5 concentration and wind speed (R = −0.65)with high-wind days, and dust in the air fluctuated greatly, causing PM 2.5 concentrations to decrease significantly [23].For the total content of trace organic compounds detected in the sample, there was an average positive correlation with the daytime average concentration of PM 2.5 (R = 0.51), showing a fairly close association between micropollutants and PM 2.5 dust.In summary, meteorological factors and PM 2.5 content can affect the content of trace organic compounds.However, the results show that the difference in trace organic contents in the three study corresponds to the three distinct regions of industry, agriculture, and transport.

Overview of Organic Micropollutant Screening
Two hundred eighty-eight compounds were detected in the samples.The total content of trace organic compounds detected in PM2.5 ranged from 41.08 to 794.80 ng.m −3 (Table S2).These components were classified into 19 pollutant categories and 3 major classes, namely, business/household/traffic, industry, and agriculture.The concentrations of compounds in each category at each site are presented in Table S1.The pollutant contents were significantly different among sampling sites, with an average concentration at TH, CG, and PN for 10 days of sampling of 179.00, 529.41, and 112.13 ng.m −3 , respectively.The highest total residue concentration was observed in TH1 at 794.80 ng.m −3 , whereas the lowest was found in CG8 at 41.08 ng.m −3 (Table S2).

Intermediate
Intermediates can be generated via industrial activities.In this study, 26 intermediates were found in 30 PM2.5 samples, which involved dyes, fibers, resins, and organic synthesis processing (Table 1).Chemicals used for dyeing included one quinolone, one anthraquinone, and three aniline derivatives, all with concentrations less than 1.88 ng.m −3 .2,7-dimethyl quinolone was found in samples collected at the CG and PN sites, and benzanthrone was detected only at CG7 at a concentration of 0.05 ng.m −3 (Table S1).Benzanthrone may be generated by military activities in the sampling area [24] that can release trace amounts of this compound.
Sixteen organic synthesizing byproducts were detected in the samples.Total concentrations of these pollutants in samples ranged from 0.08 to 2.83 ng.m −3 (Table 1), and the number of detected compounds per sample varied from 1 to 30.Hexachloroethane was detected in all samples at concentrations ranging from 0.04 to 0.64 ng.m −3 , whereas 2naphthol was detected only in PN2 at 0.11 ng.m −3 (Table S1).Hexachloroethane is a byproduct of chemical production that may cause skin irritation and kidney damage [25].Four compounds related to resin processing and one byproduct of fiber production were detected.Epsilon-caprolactam, a material used to produce fiber, was detected at approximately 0.50 ng.m −3 in PN2, TH2, and CG1, whereas concentrations were much lower in other samples.Among four resin intermediates, 4-tert-butylphenol was identified in 28 of 30 samples.

Overview of Organic Micropollutant Screening
Two hundred eighty-eight compounds were detected in the samples.The total content of trace organic compounds detected in PM 2.5 ranged from 41.08 to 794.80 ng.m −3 (Table S2).These components were classified into 19 pollutant categories and 3 major classes, namely, business/household/traffic, industry, and agriculture.The concentrations of compounds in each category at each site are presented in Table S1.The pollutant contents were significantly different among sampling sites, with an average concentration at TH, CG, and PN for 10 days of sampling of 179.00, 529.41, and 112.13 ng.m −3 , respectively.The highest total residue concentration was observed in TH1 at 794.80 ng.m −3 , whereas the lowest was found in CG8 at 41.08 ng.m −3 (Table S2).

Intermediate
Intermediates can be generated via industrial activities.In this study, 26 intermediates were found in 30 PM 2.5 samples, which involved dyes, fibers, resins, and organic synthesis processing (Table 1).Chemicals used for dyeing included one quinolone, one anthraquinone, and three aniline derivatives, all with concentrations less than 1.88 ng.m −3 .2,7-dimethyl quinolone was found in samples collected at the CG and PN sites, and benzanthrone was detected only at CG7 at a concentration of 0.05 ng.m −3 (Table S1).Benzanthrone may be generated by military activities in the sampling area [24] that can release trace amounts of this compound.
Sixteen organic synthesizing byproducts were detected in the samples.Total concentrations of these pollutants in samples ranged from 0.08 to 2.83 ng.m −3 (Table 1), and the number of detected compounds per sample varied from 1 to 30.Hexachloroethane was detected in all samples at concentrations ranging from 0.04 to 0.64 ng.m −3 , whereas 2-naphthol was detected only in PN2 at 0.11 ng.m −3 (Table S1).Hexachloroethane is a byproduct of chemical production that may cause skin irritation and kidney damage [25].Four compounds related to resin processing and one byproduct of fiber production were detected.Epsilon-caprolactam, a material used to produce fiber, was detected at approximately 0.50 ng.m −3 in PN2, TH2, and CG1, whereas concentrations were much lower in other samples.Among four resin intermediates, 4-tert-butylphenol was identified in 28 of 30 samples.The highest concentration of 4-tert-butylphenol was 0.50 ng.m −3 in PN2, whereas the concentrations were ≤0.05 ng.m −3 in other samples.N-butyl acrylate was detected in 14 samples.The samples collected in PN contained the highest contents of this compound, reaching 2.11 ng.m −3 .The detection of this compound in PN was reasonable because several textile and garment development activities took places in this area [26].The concentrations in four other samples varied from 0.01 to 0.80 ng.m −3 .Similarly, 2,6dimethylphenol was detected in only three samples at approximately 0.01 ng.m −3 , whereas 3-methoxy-1-butyl acetate was detected only in CG3 at 0.08 ng.m −3 .

Solvents and Reagents
Eight solvents and nine organic reagents were detected in the samples.Hexachlorobutadiene, a solvent used for chlorinated compounds or protective coatings [27], had the highest content among solvent pollutants and was detected in all 30 samples.Sixteen samples contained hexachlorobutadiene concentrations higher than 9 ng.m −3 .The highest concentrations were 34.08, 39.88, and 36.54 in PN1, PN2, and PN3, respectively (Table 1).Several waste-treatment facilities are located in the PN industrial park, and the incineration of chlorinate-containing products led to hexachlorobutadiene emissions [28].In contrast, TH1-TH3 samples showed the lowest hexachlorobutadiene concentrations at approximately 1 ng.m −3 .
Ethyl carbamate, a major reagent pollutant, showed trends similar to that of hexachlorobutadiene.PN1 had the highest contents of the compound at 59.02 ng.m −3 , followed by PN3 at 47.91 ng.m −3 ; the lowest concentrations were found in TH and CG samples (Table S1).Ethyl carbamate is used in the textile industry as a crosslinker for permanent pressing textile treatments to create "wash-and-wear" fabric, resulting in high concentrations in the PN area [29].

Non-Ionic Detergent Metabolites and Disinfectants
One non-ionic detergent metabolite and three disinfectants were detected in PM 2.5 samples.The highest concentration of 4-tert-octylphenol, a non-ionic detergent, was detected in sample PN2 at 0.35 ng.m −3 , followed by CG9 and CG1 at 0.18 and 0.12 ng.m −3 , respectively.Among three aromatic disinfectants, the highest content was 3.78 ng.m −3 in CG1, followed by 1.91 ng.m −3 in TH, whereas the lowest content was observed in CG8 at 0.03 ng.m −3 (Table S3).The previous report did not detect these pollutants in atmospheric particulate matter in Hanoi.A proportion of 98% of 4-tert-octylphenol is used in the manufacture of octyl phenol-formaldehyde resins for tire rubber, insulation, paint, printing inks, etc.This compound has the ability to bioaccumulate and is capable of causing hormonal disturbances, greatly affecting reproductive function [34].

PAHs
Twenty-three constituents of PAH were detected in the samples.Phenanthrene and pyrene were detected in every sample, and 10 other PAHs were found in at least 10 samples.The total PAH concentrations ranged from 0.29 to 4.40 ng.m −3 (Table 1).We Diagnostic ratios can be used to predict PAH sources.The pyrogenic index (PI) [35] is an effective indicator to differentiate pyrogenic and petrogenic PAHs.The PI index is defined as the ratio of total of three-to six-ring EPA priority PAHs to five alkylated PAHs, including homolog series of naphthalene, phenanthrene, dibenzothiophene, chrysene, and fluorene.PI values less than 0.05 indicate petrogenic sources, whereas PI values between 0.13 and 2.12 indicate pyrolytic sources.The PI values and methyl phenanthreneto-phenanthrene (MP/P) ratios of all samples are shown in Table 3.The MP/P ratios were ≤2 in most samples (excluding TH1 and TH2), suggesting the PAHs likely originated from the combustion of fossil fuels and other materials.Increases in traffic and industrial activities in Hanoi before the Lunar New Year may contribute to high PAH levels [1], which have been reported to significantly increase during festivals.

Plastics
Thirteen pollutants originating from plastics were detected in the samples at concentrations ranging from 2.31 to 35.45 ng.m −3 (Table 2).Total plastic additive concentrations were higher in the industrial and agricultural areas (PN and TH) than CG, an urban area; PN2 had the highest content at 35.45 ng.m −3 .Phthalates were the major plastic additive pollutants in PM 2.5 samples [36], and six phthalate derivatives were detected (Table S1).Moreover, di-iso-butyl phthalate, di-n-butyl phthalate, and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate were detected in all 30 samples, with concentrations ranging from 0.10 to 19.88 ng.m −3 (median: 1.69 ng.m −3 ).These compounds are commonly used in Vietnam to plasticize products [37].The processing, use, and disposal of plastic products are the main source of phthalates in PM 2.5 .Additionally, three alkylated phenols, two fatty acid esters, and two phosphate derivatives were identified (Table S1).

Petroleum
The concentrations of petroleum were particularly high in the TH samples.The concentrations in TH1-TH10 ranged from 216.8 to 460.3 ng.m −3 (Table 2).In the TH area, there is a big lake, namely West Lake (5.3 km 2 ), with a lot of tourist ships and floating restaurants.The commercial activities and vehicle parking lead to the release of petroleum compounds because fuel is not burned at suitable temperatures [38].In TH, the total petroleum concentrations of PN samples were in the range of 21.00-158.70ng.m −3 (Table 2).There are two highways crossing this area.Petroleum transportation equipment, waste burning, and coal are the main contributors to pollution in this area [39].The vigorous operation of industrial zones without emission regulations results in high levels of pollution.The total petroleum concentrations were lowest in CG, with a range of 4.2-34.1 ng.m −3 (Table 2).These petroleum emissions are mainly caused by traffic activities [40].The dust particles under the road accumulate these compounds, and air mixing caused by traffic activities mixes these pollutants with the dust in the air.

Agricultural Pollutants
One hundred and four pesticides were detected in the PM 2.5 samples.A research report on pesticides over 10 years commented on the increase in pesticide use in Vietnam and showed that many banned substances are still detected in agricultural products and have been found mixed into other pesticides [41].Total pesticide concentrations in samples from agricultural zones (TH1-TH3) were significantly higher than in urban areas (CG1-CG9) (Table S2).
The highest total fungicide contents were found in TH, with concentrations varying from 33.3 to 102.4 ng.m −3 (Table 1).PN1-PN3, CG1, CG2, and CG5 samples contained approximately 30 ng.m −3 , whereas the values in the other urban area samples (CG2-CG9) were less than 20.00 ng.m −3 .Similarly, insecticide and pesticide contents in TH1-TH3 samples were much higher than in samples from the PN industrial area, and the urban areas had lower contents of these pollutants (Table S2).Interestingly, herbicides were not detected in TH1-TH3 samples from agricultural areas, and the highest herbicide content was detected in CG1 at 4.71 ng.m −3 .Six herbicides were detected in at least one sample: mefenacet, etobenzanid, cafenstrole, pyridate, pyrazoxyfen, and flumicloracpentyl, all of which are permitted by the Vietnam Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (VMARD) [42].The concentration of each herbicide was <1.00 ng.m −3 , except for flumiclorac-pentyl in CG1 (3.51 ng.m −3 ) and pyrazoxyfen in CG4 (3.58 ng.m −3 ).
Sixty-three insecticides were detected, includes many compounds banned by VMARD.A previous study detected 30 pesticide compounds in PM 2.5 samples in Spain [43].Dieldrin showed the highest contents at 202.5 ng.m −3 in TH1, whereas those concentrations were ≥30 ng.m −3 in TH2-TH9.Among permitted insecticides, fenpropathrin and spirodiclofen were the most common, found in 28 and 30 samples, respectively.This finding differs from a previous report, in which propargite, imidacloprid, and omethoate were the most common insecticides [44].The difference may be attributed to different sampling periods and analytical methods [45].
Thirty-five fungicides were identified in the samples, among which captan and captafol were banned by VMARD.Captafol was found at 0.06 ng.m −3 in only one sample (CG9), and captan was detected at 0.11-0.2ng.m −3 in four samples (Table S1).Chloroneb and triadimenol II were the most common fungicides [46], observed in 21 of 30 samples.Oxpoconazole fumarate was observed in the highest concentrations at 45.39, 43.43, and 44.80 ng.m −3 in TH1, TH2, and TH3, respectively, and other samples contained the compound at ~30 ng.m −3 .

Conclusions
Utilizing GC-MS with the AIQS database, 288 compounds belonging to 19 pollutant groups were detected in PM 2.5 samples collected in three areas of Hanoi.Furthermore, the differences in the types of pollutants among urban, agricultural, and industrial areas were apparent.Pesticides were specific to the pollution in the agricultural zone, whereas higher concentrations of chemicals used in manufacturing and other industrial processes comprised the majority of pollutants in the industrial zones.The pollution levels in the urban central district were lower than in other areas.The current study provides a more comprehensive picture of atmospheric PM 2.5 pollutants in the capital city of Vietnam, demonstrating an advanced approach for analyzing a large number of compounds in environmental samples.The obtained results illustrate the first baseline data on the organic pollution of fine particulate matter in Hanoi.This research is limited by the small sample size and short sample collection time.The variety of organic micropollutants found in this study warrants further investigation to clarify their source apportionments.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Sampling locations for PM2.5 dust samples of this study (created by author).

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Sampling locations for PM 2.5 dust samples of this study (created by author).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. The daytime average concentration of PM2.5 and meteorological conditions during the sampling period in January 2021.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. The daytime average concentration of PM 2.5 and meteorological conditions during the sampling period in January 2021.

Table 1 .
The concentration of trace organic compounds derived from industry and agriculture (ng.m −3 ).

Table 2 .
The concentration of trace organic compounds originating from business/household/traffic (ng.m −3 ) and total trace organic compounds.

Table 3 .
Pyrogenic index values and methyl phenanthrene-to-phenanthrene (MP/P) ratios of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons detected in PM 2.5 samples collected in Hanoi, Vietnam.