The Role of Weather Types in Assessing the Rainfall Key Factors for Erosion in Two Di ﬀ erent Climatic Regions

: This paper compares two di ﬀ erent geographical sites, Aveiro and Le ó n, from di ﬀ erent climatic regions, oceanic and continental, but which share the same type of weather (according to Lamb’s classiﬁcation). The analysis was carried out over one year, and has revealed that rainfall in Aveiro is heavier and more abundant, with a higher number of raindrops and a longer duration of rain events (on average, 10 min longer than in Leon). Mean raindrop size is 0.45 mm in Aveiro and slightly smaller (0.37 mm) in Leon; in addition, the kinetic energy and linear momentum values in Aveiro are three times higher than those in Leon. A comparison of raindrop size distributions by weather type has shown that for both locations westerly weather presented a higher probability of rainfall, and the gamma distribution parameters for each weather type were independent of the study zone. When the analysis is done for the characteristics of rain related with erosion, the westerly cyclonic weather types (cyclonic west (CW) and cyclonic south-westerly (CSW)) are among the most energetic ones in both locations. However, comparing their ﬁve weather types with higher kinetic energy, in Aveiro a westerly component implies higher kinetic energy, while in Leon a southerly component involves more energy in the rain. Abstract: This paper compares two different geographical sites, Aveiro and León, from different climatic regions, oceanic and continental, but which share the same type of weather (according to Lamb ’ s classification). The analysis was carried out over one year, and has revealed that rainfall in Aveiro is heavier and more abundant, with a higher number of raindrops and a longer duration of rain events (on average, 10 minutes longer than in Leon). Mean raindrop size is 0.45 mm in Aveiro and slightly smaller (0.37 mm) in Leon; in addition, the kinetic energy and linear momentum values in Aveiro are three times higher than those in Leon. A comparison of raindrop size distributions by weather type has shown that for both locations westerly weather presented a higher probability of rainfall, and the gamma distribution parameters for each weather type were independent of the study zone. When the analysis is done for the characteristics of rain related with erosion, the westerly cyclonic weather types (cyclonic west (CW) and cyclonic south-westerly (CSW)) are among the most energetic ones in both locations. However, comparing their five weather types with higher kinetic energy, in Aveiro a westerly component implies higher kinetic energy, while in Leon a southerly component involves more energy in the rain.


Introduction
In the Mediterranean area there is a relationship between atmospheric patterns like weather types (WTs) and other natural effects, like dispersion of aerosols [1], wildfires [2] or rainfall characterization [3]. The present study claims that WT studies may be relevant in an analysis of erosive parameters caused by rain.
The amount of rainfall registered in the Iberian Peninsula varies considerably depending on the region, due to the rugged terrain [4] and the influence of the Atlantic Ocean on the western side of the Peninsula [5,6]. This ocean is the source of most synoptic disturbances in the Peninsula [7,8] and exerts a considerable influence on peninsular rainfall [9][10][11]. The influence of the Atlantic Ocean affects not only the number but also the size of raindrops, and this in turn affects other aspects as diverse as the erosive power of the raindrops [12][13][14] or radio wave propagation [15]. The use of disdrometers or other similar devices to detect the size and velocity of raindrops is therefore of considerable interest in order to measure variables such as the kinetic energy and momentum registered during a particular rain event [16][17][18].
As a result of the importance of assessing the influence of the ocean on the behavior of rainfall in different climates in neighboring regions or regions with similar characteristics [19][20][21][22], the aim of the present study is to compare the characteristics of rainfall in two points located only 230 km apart as regards east to west longitude, and 330 km in a straight line, but whose climates are very different. Aveiro has an oceanic sub-Mediterranean climate [23] and is located 28 km inland from the Atlantic Ocean, whereas Leon has a continental Mediterranean climate with Atlantic influences [24] and is located 358 km from the ocean. Nevertheless, due to their proximity, both sites share the same weather type according to Lamb's classification.
Therefore, this research may become a progress in the idea of using weather types as a possibility to simplify the measurement of rainfall parameters in erosion models, due to the simplicity of its calculation and the great number of uses that weather types already have in the modelization of other natural effects. If this analysis shows similar behavior of rain in places under the same weather type, it will be possible to try to use weather type classification in the analysis of erosion in larger areas, with the consequent decrease in the need of meteorological instrumental like disdrometers. For doing so, it will be necessary to prove that the characteristics of the rain related with rainfall erosivity under the same weather type are similar. Therefore, we have taken two places classified under the same weather type to explore these possibilities.
The hypothesis that we want to test in this study is to determine whether the rainfall characteristics that define erosion in two Iberian locations, Aveiro and Leon, with the same weather type but belonging to two different climatic regions, are similar. More specifically, for each of the 26 weather types, the goal is to determine whether the rainfall erosion-related parameters (such as duration of rain events, number of drops, raindrop size, accumulated precipitation or kinetic energy) are similar in both measurement sites. To do this, we have designed a methodology based in comparison of the most related parameters with erosion, adapting the methodology using disdrometers designed in Fernandez-Raga et al. [25] for the first time to compare two places.

Experiments
The first study zone was the city of Leon (province of Leon), located in the region of Castile and Leon in north-western Spain ( Figure 1). This is a transition zone between the two main climatic regions in Spain: the Continental and the Mediterranean regions. There is frost in winter, but only in the early morning, and some rainfall, while summers are hot and dry. Rainfall is irregular throughout the year. The rainfall data were gathered at the University of Leon (42 • 46 N, 5 • 35 W), located at about 840 m above sea level. The annual rainfall registered in Leon is 556 mm and average temperatures are around 10.9 ºC, between 3.2 ºC in January and 19.3 ºC in August [26,27].
At the second study zone, the rainfall data were gathered in a municipality in the District of Aveiro, Portugal, called Sever do Vouga. This location will be referred to as Aveiro, and is located 28 km inland from the coast (40 • 40 49 N and 8 • 20 35 W), in the west of the Iberian Peninsula. It has a sub-Mediterranean oceanic climate, characterized by mild winters and summers. The Atlantic Ocean exerts considerable influence on this area, with strong winds and moist air masses that frequently cause heavy rainfall events. Temperatures range from 6.2 • C in January to 19.3 • C in August [28]. The annual rainfall at this station is about 1880 mm.
The sampling period extended from 1 May 2007 to 26 July 2008. To characterize and quantify rainfall at each study site, an optical disdrometer (THIES Laser Precipitation Monitor, LPM) and a Weather Link station were installed. The LPM measures every minute the falling velocity and the size of the raindrops crossing a sample area of 228 × 20 mm 2 by means of a laser beam with a wavelength of 780 nm. Drop sizes are classified into 22 size bins, from 0.125 to 8 mm. Fernandez-Raga et al. [29] provide a detailed description of the LPM. There has been no missing data in the time series.
We have also studied the duration of rain events and the relationship between the rainfall registered and Lamb's classification of weather types. The weather type classification employed was described by Trigo and Dacamara [30] and requires information on direction and vorticity of the geostrophic flow obtained using the atmospheric pressure data at the 16 grid points [31]. This is an adaptation to the Iberian Peninsula of the widely used objective classification [32] designed by Lamb [33] and defined for the British Isles by Jenkinson and Collison [34]. The classification defines 26 different types of daily weather (Table 1), using a 16-point grid where pressure at sea level is known. The calculations for the different circulation parameters have been described in previous works [6,30,31]. The rainfall in Iberia has a monthly variability, which has already been studied [9,35]; the present study has been designed on a daily basis.  Probability density functions have been used to compare raindrop size distributions and rainfall volume distributions in Leon and Aveiro. Exponential and gamma distributions presented the best fit with our data [36,37].
Gamma distribution depends on the parameter α. We have an exponential distribution when α = 1. Distribution also varies with the scale parameter β, which is related to the speed with which the curve falls to zero. The function is defined for any non-negative value of x, and parameters α and βmust be true positives. When α is >1, the gamma distribution is bell-shaped, with a maximum at (α − 1)/β. The moments method was used to determine the values of α and β [38]. The moments method used the first two moments (mean µ and variance σ 2 ) of the distribution to correspond with the first two moments of the data series. With these data, the parameters of the distribution were calculated, using the following expressions: the value of the mean is µ = α/βand the variance σ 2 = α/β 2 .

General Rainfall Characteristics
Rain events were considered to have ended when less than 0.001 mm of rain were registered for a continuous period of 20 min. Based on this assumption, the number of rain events recorded during the study period was 22% higher in Aveiro, with 313 events, than in Leon, with 245. In addition, the mean duration of rainfall events was 10 min longer in Aveiro: 66 min, compared to 56 min in Leon ( Table 2). In Leon, the gamma probability density function calculated for event duration yielded a parameter α of 0.8 (close to 1), indicating a close fit with an exponential distribution function. In contrast, the parameter α for Aveiro was 0.52, thus not fitting an exponential distribution, since the maximum of the function would shift to positive values [39]. Values for the scale parameter β were similar, indicating that the frequency distribution of the duration presented a similar fall in both locations.
An analysis of daily rainfall volume revealed that Aveiro had a higher number of days than Leon for all the classes of rainfall registered, except for rainfall of less than 15 mm a day. In fact, of the 401 days compared, there were 350 days with less than 10 mm in Aveiro and 382 in Leon. Interestingly, only Aveiro, near the Atlantic Ocean, had six days where more than 25 mm fell in total, including one day that exceeded 55 mm ( Figure 2).
In contrast, Leon lies in a more continental region and the maximum rainfall registered was 25 mm over 3 days. For 89% of days in Leon, rainfall did not exceed 5 mm, whereas this percentage fell to 84% of days in Aveiro.
The mean rainfall intensity in Aveiro was 2.78 mm h −1 , representing 65% more than the mean intensity in Leon (with 1.66 mm h −1 ), and 44% more in the case of maximum rainfall intensity ( Table 3). The mean raindrop size was 20% larger in Aveiro than in Leon; however, the maximum raindrop size was the same in both locations. An analysis of the kinetic energy and momentum indicated that the values in Aveiro were 1.7 and 3.7 times higher, respectively, than those in Leon (Table 3). Cumulative rainfall was 3.25 mm in Aveiro, more than twice the figure of 1.28 mm registered in Leon.

Introduction
In the Mediterranean area there is a relationship between atmospheric patterns like weather types (WTs) and other natural effects, like dispersion of aerosols [1], wildfires [2] or rainfall characterization [3]. The present study claims that WT studies may be relevant in an analysis of erosive parameters caused by rain.  Throughout the study period, the daily amount of rainfall and the daily number of raindrops per unit area were both higher in Aveiro than in Leon. Furthermore, a comparison between the cumulative daily rainfall in Aveiro and Leon revealed a linear relationship with a positive slope of 0.1687 between the daily amount of rainfall in Aveiro and Leon. When this comparison was repeated for the daily number of raindrops in Aveiro on the x-axis versus the number of raindrops in Leon on the y-axis, the slope was somewhat lower: 0.1466. This finding coincides with the higher rainfall in an oceanic region versus the Mediterranean transition described by Gonzalez-Pola [40]. This also ties in with the fact that the mean raindrop size was slightly higher (and thus contained more water) in Aveiro than in Leon.
Interestingly, on the three days with most rainfall in Leon, the 21 and 24 May 2007 and the 24 October 2007, there was virtually no rain in Aveiro.

Raindrop Spectrum, Kinetic Energy and Linear Momentum
The mean raindrop size in Aveiro over the study period was around 0.45 mm, whereas raindrops were smaller in Leon, with a mean size of 0.37 mm. Some authors have claimed that raindrop size, mainly the number of the largest raindrops in raindrop size distribution (known as tail behavior), has an enormous influence on the main hydrology and meteorology parameters such as rain rate, liquid water content, radar reflectivity and kinetic energy [41]. In the locations studied, most raindrops ranged between 0.3 mm and 3 mm in diameter ( Figure 3). The data obtained from raindrop size and velocity measurements revealed a similar spectrum for both linear momentum and kinetic energy calculations. Since in both cases Aveiro had a higher number of raindrops per unit area and larger raindrops, rainfall in Aveiro will generate impacts with greater kinetic energy. A comparison of linear momentum or amount of movement between Aveiro and Leon ( Figure 4) revealed spectra with magnitudes that were twice as high in Aveiro for all raindrop sizes. For example, the maximum linear momentum value corresponded to raindrops measuring between 1 and 1.25 mm, reaching a value of 2.46 × 10 3 kg·s −1 ·m −1 ·mm −1 in Aveiro, whereas this was 1.22 × 10 3 kg·s −1 ·m −1 ·mm −1 in Leon ( Figure 4). This spectrum remained very similar for kinetic energy ( Figure 5), although the mode shifted slightly towards somewhat larger raindrops, with diameters ranging between 1.5 and 1.75 mm. The kinetic energy registered in Aveiro was 6.11 × 10 3 J·m −2 ·mm −1 , more than twice the kinetic energy registered in Leon, with 2.96 × 10 3 J·m −2 ·mm −1 . These values are in the range of the 1170 J·m −2 ·mm −1 maximum recorded in Zaragoza, Spain, by Angulo et al. [12].
With respect to the raindrop size spectrum, Figure 3 shows that in both Leon and Aveiro the number of raindrops decreased as the size increased, although Aveiro always had a higher number of raindrops.
The highest number of raindrops corresponded to channel 2 ( Figure 6), with sizes ranging between 0.125 and 0.250 mm. However, the channel yielding the greatest kinetic energy was unquestionably that of sizes ranging between 1.5 and 1.75 mm [31].    The maximum kinetic energy value recorded in Aveiro in one minute was 58.9 J·m −2 ·mm −1 , and in Leon 52.0 J·m −2 ·mm −1 (Table 3). These values are similar to those recorded in heavy rain events in Colombia [42], at 52.7 J·m −2 ·mm −1 per minute, and Spain, at 64.99 in Javea (Alicante) in 1957 [43]. However, these values are not always so high. Van Dijk et al. [44] have reported values of 26.4 J·m −2 ·mm −1 on the east coast of Australia, 35.9 J·m −2 ·mm −1 in the south of Portugal and 33.6 J·m −2 ·mm −1 in Arizona. Some authors have even estimated that with much lower kinetic energy values, simulated rainfall may be sufficiently representative to conduct erosion studies. At the University of Basel, Iserloh et al. [13] have calculated a kinetic energy of 5.8 J·m −2 ·mm −1 , which is much lower than the mean energies found in this study for Leon and Aveiro. In USLE (Universal Soil Loss Equation) the parameter R is the index of pluvial erosion (J·m −2 ·cm·hour −1 ), which is obtained with a theoretical equation who uses homogeneous periods of time raining and maximum intensities during the rain (cm·hour −1 ). However, in this research, we are able to compare this parameter between two sites measuring it with the real drop size distribution. This is possibly due to the use of disdrometers which may measure the drop size distribution plus the speed of every drop. If we analyze the results with the use of weather types, in this article we can confirm that under a specific weather type there is a variability in the erosive capacity due to the different climate

Types of Weather
Figures 7-9 show that the most common type of weather according to Lamb's classification is anticyclonic, with a total of 87 days. Aveiro is influenced by its proximity to the sea and, therefore, morning fog and mist are very common. In contrast, Leon is much more continental and thus drier. The instruments have also detected short, mild morning rain events in Aveiro, but these barely reached a few mm. This explains the high number of anticyclonic days with rainfall, although this is not usual (Figure 7). As a result, despite the large number of anticyclonic days with rain, the total amount of rainfall recorded was very small, and the sum of all the days with anticyclonic rain only accounted for 6% of the total (Figure 7).
In both Aveiro and Leon, the rainfall maintained a similar behavior with respect to types of weather. For example, for both sampling points, cyclonic weather (C) was associated with the highest cumulative rainfall, accounting for 216 mm in Aveiro (30% of total cumulative rainfall) and 81 mm in Leon (22%). In addition, rainy days predominated among westerly weather types [6,31,36]. This finding is expected, since the main rain fronts are westerly, entering from the Atlantic Ocean and subsequently crossing the Iberian Peninsula [9,35,45].  Figure 8 and Figure 9 show that the most common type of weather according to Lamb's 216 classification is anticyclonic, with a total of 87 days. Aveiro is influenced by its proximity to the sea 217 and, therefore, morning fog and mist are very common. In contrast, Leon is much more continental anticyclonic rain only accounted for 6% of the total (Figure 7).

230
In both Aveiro and Leon, the rainfall maintained a similar behavior with respect to types of 231 weather. For example, for both sampling points, cyclonic weather (C) was associated with the highest 232 cumulative rainfall, accounting for 216 mm in Aveiro (30% of total cumulative rainfall) and 81 mm 233 in Leon (22%). In addition, rainy days predominated among westerly weather types [6,31,36]. This 234 finding is expected, since the main rain fronts are westerly, entering from the Atlantic Ocean and 235 subsequently crossing the Iberian Peninsula [9,35,45].

236
In Aveiro, the order from highest to lowest percentage of rainfall according to weather type was:

230
In both Aveiro and Leon, the rainfall maintained a similar behavior with respect to types of 231 weather. For example, for both sampling points, cyclonic weather (C) was associated with the highest 232 cumulative rainfall, accounting for 216 mm in Aveiro (30% of total cumulative rainfall) and 81 mm 233 in Leon (22%). In addition, rainy days predominated among westerly weather types [6,31,36]. This 234 finding is expected, since the main rain fronts are westerly, entering from the Atlantic Ocean and 235 subsequently crossing the Iberian Peninsula [9,35,45].

236
In Aveiro, the order from highest to lowest percentage of rainfall according to weather type was: In Aveiro, the order from highest to lowest percentage of rainfall according to weather type was: C (30%) > SW (13%) > NW (11%) > CSW (10%), while for the same period in Leon it was C (22%) > W (20%) > N (10%) > CSW (9%). Rainfall thus appeared to show similar behavior in Leon and Aveiro for both cyclonic and anticyclonic weather types, but not for purely directional weather types. In addition, cyclonic and pure weather types were always observed to generate most rainfall. In fact, 68% of the total cumulative rainfall in Aveiro was recorded during westerly circulation weather types, and 56% in Leon, even though the sum of westerly weather types only accounted for 20% of the total number of days. These results are consistent with research on the Iberian Peninsula using databases containing up to 53 years of data [6], with the results of a 44-year study conducted by Trigo and Dacamara [30], and the conclusions of a study by Fernandez-Gonzalez et al. [5], indicating that westerly weather generates most rainfall.
An analysis of mean daily rainfall by weather type has also indicated that a westerly direction together with cyclonic conditions increased the likelihood of rain. Consistent with this, more than 17 mm of mean daily rainfall were recorded in Aveiro and 8 mm in Leon under cyclonic south-westerly (CSW) conditions. This cyclonic situation usually corresponds to instability caused by a wet front from the Atlantic Ocean, which is one of the four scenarios proposed by Romero et al. [46] that generate heavy rainfall in the Iberian Peninsula.
Cyclonic westerly weather (CW) was also notable in terms of the average daily rainfall registered (Figure 8), accounting for 4 mm in Leon and 15.7 mm in Aveiro. The weather type that generated most cumulative rainfall (cyclonic, C) did not coincide with the type that generated the highest average daily rainfall (CSW) because it was a relatively common weather type, with 21 days in total (6% of days) and therefore its average daily rainfall was lower than that of others with less cumulative rainfall but which occurred less frequently.
In contrast, the average rainfall for other weather types increased due to their low frequency of occurrence, implying division by a very low number of days, thus greatly increasing the average rainfall value. Such was the case of the cyclonic northerly weather type (CN), which generated 16 mm of cumulative rainfall in Aveiro (Figure 7), thus occupying the tenth place when weather types were ranked according to cumulative rainfall; but this same weather type occupies the fourth place (8 mm) when ranked according to average daily rainfall (Figure 8), because it is a very infrequent weather type (only 0.5% of the total number of days). In this case, the ranking of weather types from high to low average rainfall was similar in Aveiro and Leon, with CSW being the highest one in both cases, followed by CW, SW and C.
As regards the number of raindrops registered, Aveiro differed from Leon in having a higher number of raindrops per unit area during anticyclonic westerly weather (AW), which is not usually noted for rainfall ( Figure 9). Westerly (W), north-westerly (NW) cyclonic south-westerly (CSW) and south-westerly (SW) weather types also featured prominently, with values higher than 10 8 , 9.2 × 10 7 , 7.5 × 10 7 and 6.3 × 10 7 raindrops per m −2 , respectively. In Leon, however, cyclonic south-westerly (CSW) and cyclonic (C) weather types generated the highest number of raindrops, although in the reverse order of importance with respect to cumulative rainfall. These were followed by westerly (W) and south-westerly (SW) weather types, and thus CSW, W and SW types accounted for the highest number of raindrops at both locations, albeit with fewer raindrops in Leon than in Aveiro. For example, the number of raindrops registered in Leon was 56% lower for cyclonic south-westerly (CSW) weather and 28% lower for westerly (W) weather.
An analysis of raindrop size spectra on rainy days according to weather type revealed that those with a westerly component presented the highest number of raindrops (AW, NW, W, CSW, SW and CW). These all showed a similar spectrum as regards the gamma probability density function; most notably, there were 4 times more raindrops in Aveiro than in Leon per m 2 (Figure 9).
Since the raindrop size spectra fit a gamma distribution [25], we have used gamma parameters (Table 4) to compare raindrop size distributions for different types of weather, and also to calculate the most frequent values or modes. The K-S test of goodness of fit has been applied to the gamma distributions for all the weather types, and a good fit was found in all cases for a significance level of p < 0.05. Table 4. Mean values of α and β parameters of the gamma probability density function of raindrop sizes, and mode (mm) by weather type in León, Spain, and Aveiro, Portugal, according to Lamb's classification.

Lamb Classification Parameters Mode (mm) Aveiro León
Weather Type  Table 4 shows that both locations generally present very similar parameter values for the gamma distribution function of the size spectrum, except for the weather types that include an easterly component, such as south-easterly (SE), or easterly and anticyclonic south-westerly (E and ASW), with no rain, and which are not shown in the table. In easterly weather types, the mode depended on the location: for CNE and SE types, the mode was about 0.3 mm higher in Aveiro than in Leon. For ANE and CE types, the mode was 0.2 mm higher in Leon, and very close to 0 in Aveiro, representing quasi-exponential distribution values. In all other cases, the difference was less than 0.15 mm (and for 70% of weather types it was less than 0.1 mm).
In Aveiro, α values ranged between 0.44 for AE and 4.75 for N, whereas the dispersion of α values in Leon was somewhat lower, from 0.39 for SE to 4.03 for CS.
In both sites, the raindrop size distributions corresponding to AE, ASE, NE and S weather types are the closest to an exponential distribution. However, when only the distributions corresponding to weather types in Leon are considered, besides the weather types already mentioned, distributions corresponding to AN, CNE also present a quasi-exponential distribution.
As shown in Table 5, the momentum of the rainfall follows a similar pattern to the kinetic energy, except for the case of CSE. Table 5 shows the kinetic energy and the linear momentum of the drops, which are very important variables in the estimation of soil erosion by rainfall. The kinetic energy and the momentum (Table 5) have a similar spectrum in Aveiro and Leon, except for the moment of the CSE in the case of Leon. The general pattern in both sites shows that the cyclonic weather types are the most energetic and the pure weather types range second. In both locations, the cyclonic westerly weather type is the most energetic one. However, there are weather types that behave differently in both locations; for example, the weather types cyclonic (C) and westerly (W) produce a higher impact on the soil in Aveiro, while in Leon the weather types from the south (S) and the cyclonic south-easterly (CSE) and cyclonic westerly (CSW) have more energy than the rest of the weather types. This difference may be due to the fact that the fronts coming from the west to Leon have first crossed an orographic barrier in Serra da tras-os Montes e alto Douro and Serra da-Estrela, and reach Leon with a smaller amount of water (Table 5).
From the five most energetic weather types in the whole study period in Aveiro and Leon, only CSW and CW occur in both places (both from the west). In Aveiro, the other three most energetic weather types are: 2 westerlies (W and SW) and C, while in Leon, the rest are S, CSE and N.
Concerning the daily kinetic energy, again CW and CSW are the types with a higher value, but, in this case, CN also stands out in both sites (it was registered only in two rain days, but the raindrops in both days were very energetic). Except the CN, all the most energetic weather types in Aveiro have a westerly component (CW, CNW, CSW and SW), but in Leon, they do not (S and CSE).
In Aveiro the precipitation volume is larger than in Leon, so the energy is also higher. Indeed, the weather types from Aveiro are rainier than in Leon except AE; AN; CE; CNE; CS; CSE; N; NE; S; SE. This means that the cyclonic weather types are usually rainier in Leon than in Aveiro only when coming from the east (CE, CNE, CSE) or south (CS). Concerning the purely directional types, they are rainier in Aveiro than in Leon only when coming from the west.

Conclusions
We have compared rainfall in Aveiro, Portugal, and Leon, Spain, two cities located 330 km apart with oceanic and continental climates, respectively, over a study period of more than one year. Applying a new methodology of comparison, we can confirm that the classification on Lamb weather types cannot substitute the rainfall parameters measure with other instruments on models of erosion, because under the same weather type we may find differences between the characteristics of rainfall more important for erosion measured in each climate.
Our results indicate that Aveiro, the city with an oceanic climate, experiences heavier and more abundant rainfall, with a higher number of raindrops per m 2 and a longer duration of rain events (10 min longer on average). In addition, the kinetic energy and linear momentum of rainfall in Aveiro on average doubled that of Leon. Mean raindrop size was 0.45 mm in Aveiro, and slightly lower, 0.37 mm, in Leon, consistent with momentum and kinetic energy. This is very important due to the close link between kinetic energy and erosion reflected in the literature.
This study of weather types has confirmed that westerly types present the highest probability of rain in both Aveiro and Leon. Of particular importance was the cyclonic south-westerly weather (CSW), with almost 17 mm of mean daily rainfall in Aveiro and about 8 mm in Leon. In general, cyclonic and pure weather types generate most rainfall in both locations.
When we fitted the raindrop size spectrum to the gamma probability density, we found that the gamma distribution parameters for each type of weather were independent of the study zone (Aveiro or Leon), except for weather with an easterly component, which varied slightly more. For these types, the mode depended on the location. For CNE and SE, the mode was about 0.3 mm higher in Aveiro than in Leon. For ANE and EC, the mode was 0.2 mm higher in Leon. In all other cases, the difference was less than 0.15 mm (and for 70% of weather types it was less than 0.1 mm).
Concerning the analysis of which weather types may have a bigger impact on erosion, it can be seen that two of the five weather types with higher kinetic energy and momentum coincide in both locations (CW and CSW), while the other three more energetic weather types depend on the site. In Aveiro the component from the west seems to have a bigger influence, whereas in Leon the component from the south seems to have more erosive power.