Roles of Nuclear Orphan Receptors TR2 and TR4 during Hematopoiesis

TR2 and TR4 (NR2C1 and NR2C2, respectively) are evolutionarily conserved nuclear orphan receptors capable of binding direct repeat sequences in a stage-specific manner. Like other nuclear receptors, TR2 and TR4 possess important roles in transcriptional activation or repression with developmental stage and tissue specificity. TR2 and TR4 bind DNA and possess the ability to complex with available cofactors mediating developmental stage-specific actions in primitive and definitive erythrocytes. In erythropoiesis, TR2 and TR4 are required for erythroid development, maturation, and key erythroid transcription factor regulation. TR2 and TR4 recruit and interact with transcriptional corepressors or coactivators to elicit developmental stage-specific gene regulation during hematopoiesis.


Introduction
Nuclear receptors (NRs) are a family of ligand-regulated transcription factors that act as precisely controlled activators or repressors based on their ability to bind small target ligands.NRs feature a highly conserved DNA-binding domain (DBD), a variable N-terminal regulatory domain (NTD) that contains an activation function (AF-1), a hinge region, and a ligand-binding domain on the C-terminus which may mediate dimerization or interaction partner binding.The ligand-binding domain (LBD) retains an activation function (AF-2) mediating the action of ligand binding [1].
NR families are divided based on the phylogeny of the most prominent members, as follows [2]: I. Thyroid hormone receptor-like, which includes non-steroid hormone receptors thyroid hormone (TR), retinoic acid receptors (RARs), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), and vitamin D receptor-like (VDR).
III. Estrogen receptor-like, which includes estrogen and androgen receptors (ER and AR), as well as glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors (GR and MR).

TR2/TR4 Structure and Putative Ligands
Like other NRs, both TR2 and TR4 have several function domains.The N-terminal DBD can recognize and bind to specific DNA sequences.The LBD near the C-terminal enables the binding of potential ligands, such as hormones or small molecules, which may induce conformational changes in TR2 and TR4 and affect their transcriptional activity.AF domains might be responsible for target gene activation or repression by recruiting either coactivator or corepressor proteins to the transcription initiation complex (Figure 1).
enables the binding of potential ligands, such as hormones or small molecules, which may induce conformational changes in TR2 and TR4 and affect their transcriptional activity.AF domains might be responsible for target gene activation or repression by recruiting either coactivator or corepressor proteins to the transcription initiation complex (Figure 1).
Most NRs homo-or heterodimerize with another NR before binding two copies of a directly repeated (DR) hexanucleotide sequence called a half-site.The half-site consensus sequence for TR2 and TR4 is AGGTCA and occurs in variable orientations, such as the sequencing being everted or inverted [3,4].The two half-sites may be separated by a variable number of nucleotide spacings, with a number indicating the nucleotide difference between them, for example, DR1 indicates one nucleotide between both directly repeated half-sites [16].The variation of half-site orientation and spacing likely varies the affinity, which correlates with TR4 binding.Consistent with that notion, ChIP-seq and CUT&RUN analysis have revealed DR1 as the highest-represented DR element in erythroid cells [16].TR2 and TR4 are classified as orphan receptors, meaning that their associated endogenous ligands have not been identified definitively.A few studies indicate that their activity can be influenced by a range of exogenous ligands and cofactors.While TR4 has been shown to respond to vitamin A, the concentrations at which it responds in vitro suggests this may not be the bona fide activating ligand [10].A physical interaction-based surface plasmon resonance imaging assay has revealed that nilotinib demonstrated the most potent inhibition, whereas genistein emerged as the most potent activator of TR4 [17].Other potential ligands, including polyunsaturated fatty acids, have also been shown to promote modest TR4 transcriptional activity when compared to the concentration necessary to induce activation of a variety of other known NRs [18,19].Metformin and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) inhibitors, MEK-162 and PD98059, have been reported to inhibit TR4 transcriptional activity [20][21][22].

Hematopoiesis and Globin Switching
Within hematopoiesis, the roles of TR2 and TR4 have been highly characterized in erythropoiesis.In mammals, the first erythroid cells emerge from "blood islands" comprised of hemangioblasts within the yolk sac, which gives rise to the first wave of primitive erythroid progenitors.In mice, this wave of transient progenitors arises from the yolk sac around embryonic day 7.5 (e7.5), and wanes from e12.5-e16.5 to give way for definitive Most NRs homo-or heterodimerize with another NR before binding two copies of a directly repeated (DR) hexanucleotide sequence called a half-site.The half-site consensus sequence for TR2 and TR4 is AGGTCA and occurs in variable orientations, such as the sequencing being everted or inverted [3,4].The two half-sites may be separated by a variable number of nucleotide spacings, with a number indicating the nucleotide difference between them, for example, DR1 indicates one nucleotide between both directly repeated half-sites [16].The variation of half-site orientation and spacing likely varies the affinity, which correlates with TR4 binding.Consistent with that notion, ChIP-seq and CUT&RUN analysis have revealed DR1 as the highest-represented DR element in erythroid cells [16].
TR2 and TR4 are classified as orphan receptors, meaning that their associated endogenous ligands have not been identified definitively.A few studies indicate that their activity can be influenced by a range of exogenous ligands and cofactors.While TR4 has been shown to respond to vitamin A, the concentrations at which it responds in vitro suggests this may not be the bona fide activating ligand [10].A physical interaction-based surface plasmon resonance imaging assay has revealed that nilotinib demonstrated the most potent inhibition, whereas genistein emerged as the most potent activator of TR4 [17].Other potential ligands, including polyunsaturated fatty acids, have also been shown to promote modest TR4 transcriptional activity when compared to the concentration necessary to induce activation of a variety of other known NRs [18,19].Metformin and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) inhibitors, MEK-162 and PD98059, have been reported to inhibit TR4 transcriptional activity [20-22].

Hematopoiesis and Globin Switching
Within hematopoiesis, the roles of TR2 and TR4 have been highly characterized in erythropoiesis.In mammals, the first erythroid cells emerge from "blood islands" comprised of hemangioblasts within the yolk sac, which gives rise to the first wave of primitive erythroid progenitors.In mice, this wave of transient progenitors arises from the yolk sac around embryonic day 7.5 (e7.5), and wanes from e12.5-e16.5 to give way for definitive erythropoiesis occurring in the developing fetal liver [23].The fetal liver is seeded by erythromyeloid progenitors (EMPs) derived from the yolk sac at e8.5, which produces the first wave of definitive erythrocytes to sustain embryogenesis until birth [24].After birth, the primary site of erythropoiesis shifts to the bone marrow where hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) take over as the primary source of all hematopoietic cells, including erythrocytes.HSCs initially specify a heterogeneous population of multipotent progenitors (MPPs), which have the potential to produce increasingly restricted pools of downstream progenitor populations, such as the megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor (MEP), granulocyte-macrophage progenitor (GMP), or common lymphoid progenitor (CLP) (Figure 2).The final stage in commitment to the erythroid lineage occurs when MEPs differentiate into a functionally defined burst-forming unit (BFU-E) [25].BFU-E possesses the bulk of the proliferative potential of erythroid cells and ultimately differentiates to produce smaller functionally defined erythroid precursors known as colony-forming units (CFU-E) [26].Each CFU-E differentiates to produce a proerythroblast, which undergoes successive symmetric divisions to generate basophilic, polychromatic, and orthochromatic erythroblasts, doubling the number of cells at each stage.Orthochromatic erythroblasts undergo enucleation to produce reticulocytes that mature to erythrocytes as they enter circulation.
erythropoiesis occurring in the developing fetal liver [23].The fetal liver is seeded by erythromyeloid progenitors (EMPs) derived from the yolk sac at e8.5, which produces the first wave of definitive erythrocytes to sustain embryogenesis until birth [24].After birth, the primary site of erythropoiesis shifts to the bone marrow where hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) take over as the primary source of all hematopoietic cells, including erythrocytes.HSCs initially specify a heterogeneous population of multipotent progenitors (MPPs), which have the potential to produce increasingly restricted pools of downstream progenitor populations, such as the megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor (MEP), granulocyte-macrophage progenitor (GMP), or common lymphoid progenitor (CLP) (Figure 2).The final stage in commitment to the erythroid lineage occurs when MEPs differentiate into a functionally defined burst-forming unit (BFU-E) [25].BFU-E possesses the bulk of the proliferative potential of erythroid cells and ultimately differentiates to produce smaller functionally defined erythroid precursors known as colony-forming units (CFU-E) [26].Each CFU-E differentiates to produce a proerythroblast, which undergoes successive symmetric divisions to generate basophilic, polychromatic, and orthochromatic erythroblasts, doubling the number of cells at each stage.Orthochromatic erythroblasts undergo enucleation to produce reticulocytes that mature to erythrocytes as they enter circulation.While circulating erythrocytes may have different developmental origins during embryogenesis, depending on which wave of erythropoiesis is responsible for their production, so too does the content of their hemoglobin differ depending on their developmental origins.Hemoglobin is comprised of two subunits, namely an α-like subunit and a β-like globin gene subunit.The human α-and β-globin loci each hold four and five different globin genes, respectively, while the murine α-and β-globin loci have three and four different respective globin genes.These genes are expressed in order during development under the control of the 5′ locus control region (LCR) for each globin gene cluster.The While circulating erythrocytes may have different developmental origins during embryogenesis, depending on which wave of erythropoiesis is responsible for their production, so too does the content of their hemoglobin differ depending on their developmental origins.Hemoglobin is comprised of two subunits, namely an α-like subunit and a β-like globin gene subunit.The human αand β-globin loci each hold four and five different globin genes, respectively, while the murine αand β-globin loci have three and four different respective globin genes.These genes are expressed in order during development under the control of the 5 ′ locus control region (LCR) for each globin gene cluster.The LCR acts as a super-enhancer in conjunction with transcription factors that are recruited to the promoter of each globin gene to activate or repress each respective subunit, thereby controlling the timing and levels of globin gene expression [27][28][29].
At the human β-globin locus, the first β-like globin gene that is expressed is the embryonic ε-globin gene, and it is expressed in primitive erythroid progenitors derived from the yolk sac.To meet the oxygen demands of the developing fetus, the first switch in β-globin transcription results in the silencing of ε-globin and concomitant activation of the fetal γ-globin genes as the production of erythrocytes shifts to the fetal liver, marking the beginning of definitive erythropoiesis.Fetal hemoglobin (HbF) consisting of two α-globin chains and two γ-globin chains (α2γ2) has a greater affinity for oxygen than adult hemoglobin, thus enabling sufficient transfer of oxygen across the placenta.Gradually, at around the time of birth, a second switch from fetal γ-globin to adult β-globin transcription occurs as the site of hematopoiesis shifts again to the adult bone marrow (Figure 3).Shortly after birth, adult β-globin becomes the predominant form of globin subunit used in hemoglobin synthesis.The molecular mechanisms underlying the lineage and stage-specific globin switches through chromatin modifications have made the β-globin locus an attractive model for the dynamic role of epigenetics in gene regulation [30].
globin transcription results in the silencing of ε-globin and concomitant activation of the fetal γ-globin genes as the production of erythrocytes shifts to the fetal liver, marking the beginning of definitive erythropoiesis.Fetal hemoglobin (HbF) consisting of two α-globin chains and two γ-globin chains (α2γ2) has a greater affinity for oxygen than adult hemoglobin, thus enabling sufficient transfer of oxygen across the placenta.Gradually, at around the time of birth, a second switch from fetal γ-globin to adult β-globin transcription occurs as the site of hematopoiesis shifts again to the adult bone marrow (Figure 3).Shortly after birth, adult β-globin becomes the predominant form of globin subunit used in hemoglobin synthesis.The molecular mechanisms underlying the lineage and stagespecific globin switches through chromatin modifications have made the β-globin locus an attractive model for the dynamic role of epigenetics in gene regulation [30].
Mice are a commonly studied model due to their similarity in β-globin switching compared to humans.Mice express εy-and βh1-globin genes in primitive erythrocytes, until the βh1-globin gene is silenced, while the εy-globin gene persists as the adult β-globin genes (βmajor and βminor) become the predominantly expressed and incorporated β-globin subunit near parturition (Figure 3).The LCR super-enhancer drives the developmentally coordinated β-type globin genes in order of their arrangement in the loci, beginning with the embryonic-type globin genes (ε in humans or εy/βh1 in mice) and progressing through the fetal globin genes (Gγ and Aγ) to express the definitive β-globin genes (δ/β in humans or βmajor/βminor in mice) after birth.LCR, Locus control region; BM, Bone marrow.

Role of TR2/TR4 in Erythropoiesis
TR2 and TR4 are constitutively expressed throughout definitive erythroid differentiation [31,32].The genetic requirements of TR2 and TR4 have been revealed through extensive use of loss-of-function mouse models.TR2 null mice display no obvious phenotype, while TR4 mice display growth and behavioral defects [9, [33][34][35].Compound mutant embryos lacking both TR2 and TR4 die preimplantation, initially suggesting the roles of TR2/4 may be partially redundant [36,37].However, the complete loss of TR4 in congenic C57BL/6 background led to embryonic lethality before e9.5 of gestation, while partial loss led to defects in erythropoiesis [38].Mice are a commonly studied model due to their similarity in β-globin switching compared to humans.Mice express εyand βh1-globin genes in primitive erythrocytes, until the βh1-globin gene is silenced, while the εy-globin gene persists as the adult β-globin genes (β major and β minor ) become the predominantly expressed and incorporated β-globin subunit near parturition (Figure 3).

Role of TR2/TR4 in Erythropoiesis
TR2 and TR4 are constitutively expressed throughout definitive erythroid differentiation [31,32].The genetic requirements of TR2 and TR4 have been revealed through extensive use of loss-of-function mouse models.TR2 null mice display no obvious phenotype, while TR4 mice display growth and behavioral defects [9, [33][34][35].Compound mutant embryos lacking both TR2 and TR4 die preimplantation, initially suggesting the roles of TR2/4 may be partially redundant [36,37].However, the complete loss of TR4 in congenic C57BL/6 background led to embryonic lethality before e9.5 of gestation, while partial loss led to defects in erythropoiesis [38].
The role of TR2 and TR4 in erythrocytes was first discovered while searching for the mechanisms that facilitate β-globin switching.Analysis of the β-globin locus has revealed DR sites in the promoter of εand γ-globin genes that, when mutated, lead to aberrant autonomous expression of either gene causing high-persistence of fetal hemoglobin (HPFH) [39,40].Research investigating the phenomenon led to the isolation of TR2 and TR4 from erythroid cell lines in the form of proteins bound to the repressive DRED complex (Direct Repeat Erythroid-Definitive).Subsequently, TR2 and TR4 were shown to bind to DR1 sites in the εand γ-globin gene promoters in vitro using biochemical assays [33].
Experiments examining the role of TR2 and TR4 on globin expression in vivo by using human β-globin yeast artificial chromosome (β-YAC) transgenic mice (containing the entire human β-globin gene cluster) in conjunction with dominant-negative TR4 mice, demonstrated activation of human ε-globin in primitive and definitive erythrocytes as well as the activation of γ-globin in definitive erythroid cells, suggesting stage-specificity to the repressive roles of TR2 and TR4.Compound TR2 and TR4 mutants demonstrated induction of murine embryonic εyand βh1-globin gene expression and the repression of the adult β major gene [37].
Since compound TR2/TR4 null mice die peri-implantation, the role of TR2 and TR4 in erythropoiesis in vivo has been determined through conditional knockout experiments.In Tr2 −/− Tr4 f/f mice, isolated bone marrow progenitors were infected with a Cre-expressing adenovirus to delete TR4.After differentiation in an in vitro culture system that closely recapitulates erythroid development in vivo, loss of TR2 and TR4 attenuated differentiation and terminal maturation.While the cause of blocked differentiation is unclear, there was a significant loss in Kruppel-like Factor 1 (KLF1) and induction of GATA Binding Protein 1 (Gata1), both essential to erythroid development [37].
Tr4 −/− mice exhibited embryonic lethality prior to the onset of hematopoiesis [38].Therefore, the role of Tr4 in murine erythropoiesis was studied in Tr4 +/− mice, which identified defects in erythroid differentiation and the proliferation of erythroid precursors.This is attributed to reduced expression of factors required for heme biosynthesis, such as Alas2 or Alad, and the increased expression of Cdkn1c, a factor which is responsible for negative regulation of cell-cycle progression [41].
The forced expression of TR2 and TR4 in sickle cell disease (SCD) mice has been shown to reduce pathological symptoms associated with the disease [42].Subsequent studies attempting to ascertain the cause of the improvement have found evidence of a decrease in sickled erythrocytes adhering to vascular cell-adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), which leads to vaso-occlusive events on endothelial cells [43].The reduction in adherence may reflect either an increase in HbF or a reduction in circulating reticulocytes, which have greater properties of adherence than mature erythrocytes.
TIF1β (also known as Trim28) was investigated subsequently following its copurification from TR2 and TR4 to determine what role it may play in β-globin gene expression and erythropoiesis due to its previous characterization of a transcriptional repressor in many cell types [55,56].The TIF1β-HP1 system is responsible for maintaining HSC transcriptional integrity [57].The in vivo loss of TIF1β in murine adult HSCs resulted in defective erythropoiesis, reduced heme biosynthesis enzymes, and increased apoptosis in immature erythrocytes [58].
Nuclear receptor corepressor-1 (NCoR1) was identified as the key component of the DRED complex through the use of proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID), and serves as the direct adapter between TR2/TR4 and other corepressors [59].The deubiquitinase BRCA1-associated protein-1 (BAP1) is responsible for maintaining NCoR1 at sites in the β-globin locus.Disruption of NCoR1 interaction with TR2/TR4 or deficiency of BAP1 reactivates γ-globin expression and induces HbF production.
Those findings suggest that TR2 and TR4 may function as repressors in various capacities based on the properties of bound cofactors.Interestingly, the majority of the TR2/TR4 corepressors also interact with the BCL11A or ZBTB7A (LRF) [69][70][71][72], both of which are demonstrated to be the most physiologically significant γ-globin repressors, indicating that the corepressors may be recruited by multiple DNA-binding transcription factors to contribute to γ-globin repression.Whether different transcription factors interact with the same corepressors competitively remains to be elucidated.
PGC1 compound mutant mice display hematological deficiencies such as anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia.The complete compound loss of PGC1 depletes globin gene expression at all stages and results in a block in terminal erythrocyte differentiation.During primitive erythropoiesis, the role of PGC1α and PGC1β appears to be compensatory since the loss of both genes has a more severe phenotype compared to the loss of either PGC1 variant.Conversely, in definitive erythroid cells there is no significant difference in globin gene expression in single PGC1 knockout versus compound mutant mice, indicating there is stage and gene specificity in its role of gene transcription.
In primitive erythroid cells, both PGC1α and PGC1β bind to εyand βh1-globin promoters during times of abundant expression.In definitive erythroid cells, PGC1α/PGC1β associates the εy-globin gene promoter, while it is typically expressed and is not found at the repressed βh1 promoter or expressed β major gene.At postnatal day 0, PGC1α and PGC1β do not bind with TR2 or TR4 at either promoter when the genes should be repressed.The concurrent binding of PGC1α and PGC1β in close proximity to TR2 and TR4 in strong correlation with the coordinated expression of εyand βh1-globin genes strongly suggests their roles as stage-specific activators in association with TR2 and TR4 [73].
Similarly, in human primary erythroid progenitor CD34 + cells, an intriguing interaction between PGC-1α and TR4 was observed.Upregulation of PGC-1α in CD34 + cells using lentiviral overexpressing of PGC-1α or a PGC-1α agonist (ZLN005) leads to increased γ-globin expression at both mRNA and protein levels, as well as increased number of HbF positive cells (F-cells) during cultures [74].These findings shed light on the potential regulatory roles of TR2/TR4 with the transcriptional co-activator PGC-1α in modulating γ-globin expression in human primary erythroid progenitor CD34 + cells.

TR2/TR4 Regulate Key Erythroid Genes
TR2 and TR4 play essential roles in the development of erythroid cells via their ability to regulate the expression of Gata1.Gata1 is an essential transcription factor required for the survival and differentiation of erythrocytes, megakaryocytes, and eosinophilic progenitors [75].In erythropoiesis, Gata1 is responsible for the survival of erythroid precursors by activating erythropoietin signaling [76].Loss of Gata1 results in embryonic lethality between e10.5-e11.5 due to anemia, as other studies have shown Gata1 null primitive and definitive erythroblasts undergo apoptosis [75,[77][78][79].TR2 and TR4 have been shown to directly bind the Gata1 hematopoietic enhancer (G1HE) −3.7 Kb upstream from the Gata1 1b exon and subsequently repress Gata1 during terminal erythroid differentiation [80].It is hypothesized that TR2 and TR4 are responsible for the repression of Gata1 transcription in developing erythroblasts, a requirement thought to be essential for terminal erythroid maturation.
The compound loss of TR2 and TR4 in bone marrow progenitors leads to a loss of KLF1 expression, a transcription factor critical to erythroid development, and is itself activated by Gata1 [81,82].KLF1 is required for the activation of the adult β-globin gene and may also function as a fetal globin gene repressor through activation of BCL11A or abrogation of repressors KLF3 and KLF8, null mutations of which cause increased fetal hemoglobin [82][83][84].TR2/TR4 may also indirectly regulate KLF1 through interaction with Mi2B, a known activator of KLF1 and cofactor of TR2 and TR4 [55].
Reduction of TR4 abundance leads to decreased expression of Alad and Alas2 genes that are essential for heme biosynthesis and erythroid differentiation.In contrast, TR4 reduction results in increased expression of the proliferation inhibitory factor, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (Cdkn1c).These findings support the key role of TR4 in promoting erythroid maturation and proliferation [38].

Summary and Future Perspectives
The dynamic landscape of chromatin throughout differentiation from the HSC requires precise and coordinated epigenetic changes which are mediated by nuclear receptors such as TR2 and TR4.TR2 and TR4 are capable of recruiting cofactors, and the interactions between them enable the chromatin remodeling required for differentiation.Loss of TR2 and TR4 results in the attenuation of erythrocyte differentiation, but further work is needed to elucidate the precise mechanism as TR2 and TR4 cannot be readily manipulated in vivo.
The regulatory targets of TR2 and TR4 are widely variable with regard to their necessity and function.Some targets, such as Gata1, are crucial to successful cell development, while others are required for cell metabolism.The multifaceted control of TR2 and TR4 target genes demonstrates the ability of nuclear receptors to allow for cell-specific differences in expression.
While TR2 and TR4 bind preferentially to DR1 sites, they possess the capability to bind half-sites with variable orientations and spacing.Alterations in NR-binding site affinity allow for multiple, simultaneous binding sites of TR2 and TR4 that may be occupied preferentially based on similarity to the consensus sequence.The abundance of NRs may determine the number and degree to which possible target genes are affected in a particular cell type.
To further increase the target diversity, interactions between transcription factor families allow for targets other than canonical binding sites.TR2 and TR4 interact with cofactor complexes to mediate target gene activation or repression.After nuclear receptors bind to their respective binding sites, the availability and the abundance of their cofactors determine whether the gene will be expressed.If coactivators are the dominant species of cofactor specific to an NR such as TR2 and TR4, then genes bound by them are acti-vated.Conversely, should corepressors be the most available cofactor, then the NRs would mediate target gene suppression (Figure 4).The multitude of NR targets that require different patterns of expression can be mediated by one, if not more, regulatory mechanisms previously described.ular cell type.
To further increase the target diversity, interactions between transcription factor f ilies allow for targets other than canonical binding sites.TR2 and TR4 interact with co tor complexes to mediate target gene activation or repression.After nuclear receptors b to their respective binding sites, the availability and the abundance of their cofactors termine whether the gene will be expressed.If coactivators are the dominant specie cofactor specific to an NR such as TR2 and TR4, then genes bound by them are activa Conversely, should corepressors be the most available cofactor, then the NRs would diate target gene suppression (Figure 4).The multitude of NR targets that require diffe patterns of expression can be mediated by one, if not more, regulatory mechanisms viously described.The model in which the stage-specific molecular mechanisms cofactor recruitm may be studied at the β-globin locus to discern how cofactors may differentially ac genes throughout development from a stem-like progenitor.Targeted disruption of in actions between cofactors may allow for safer therapeutic interventions for blood dise and hemoglobinopathies by leaving essential molecular interactions intact.More wo required to establish the precise interactions between TR2 and TR4 with known and a unknown cofactors to determine the mechanisms of control by this stage-specific g regulator in developing erythroid cells.The findings from these studies might also to establish therapeutic indications in other hematological malignancies, and help to derstand the basic mechanisms of hematologic development related to cancer and o diseases.The model in which the stage-specific molecular mechanisms cofactor recruitment may be studied at the β-globin locus to discern how cofactors may differentially act on genes throughout development from a stem-like progenitor.Targeted disruption of interactions between cofactors may allow for safer therapeutic interventions for blood diseases and hemoglobinopathies by leaving essential molecular interactions intact.More work is required to establish the precise interactions between TR2 and TR4 with known and as yet unknown cofactors to determine the mechanisms of control by this stage-specific gene regulator in developing erythroid cells.The findings from these studies might also help to establish therapeutic indications in other hematological malignancies, and help to understand the basic mechanisms of hematologic development related to cancer and other diseases.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Model of hematopoiesis.HSCs retain high plasticity and produce MPPs which are totipotent with limited self-renewal capacity.The progeny of MPPs are increasingly lineage-restricted and responsible for the production of all differentiated blood cell types.HSC, Hematopoietic Stem Cell; MPP, Multipotent Progenitor; MEP, Megakaryocyte-Erythroid Progenitor; GMP, Granulocyte-Macrophage Progenitor; CLP, Common Lymphocyte Progenitor.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Model of hematopoiesis.HSCs retain high plasticity and produce MPPs which are totipotent with limited self-renewal capacity.The progeny of MPPs are increasingly lineage-restricted and responsible for the production of all differentiated blood cell types.HSC, Hematopoietic Stem Cell; MPP, Multipotent Progenitor; MEP, Megakaryocyte-Erythroid Progenitor; GMP, Granulocyte-Macrophage Progenitor; CLP, Common Lymphocyte Progenitor.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.Structure and organization of human and mouse β-type globin loci.The LCR super-enhancer drives the developmentally coordinated β-type globin genes in order of their arrangement in the loci, beginning with the embryonic-type globin genes (ε in humans or εy/βh1 in mice) and progressing through the fetal globin genes (Gγ and Aγ) to express the definitive β-globin genes (δ/β in humans or βmajor/βminor in mice) after birth.LCR, Locus control region; BM, Bone marrow.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.Structure and organization of human and mouse β-type globin loci.The LCR superenhancer drives the developmentally coordinated β-type globin genes in order of their arrangement in the loci, beginning with the embryonic-type globin genes (ε in humans or εy/βh1 in mice) and progressing through the fetal globin genes (G γ and A γ ) to express the definitive β-globin genes (δ/β in humans or βmajor/βminor in mice) after birth.LCR, Locus control region; BM, Bone marrow.