Next Article in Journal
Differential Gene Expression in Longissimus Dorsi Muscle of Hanwoo Steers—New Insight in Genes Involved in Marbling Development at Younger Ages
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Bacteria and Fungi DNA Abundance in Human Tissues
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the TCP Gene Family in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and Their Transcriptional Responses to Different Treatments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assembling Reads Improves Taxonomic Classification of Species
Article

Metagenomic Information Recovery from Human Stool Samples Is Influenced by Sequencing Depth and Profiling Method

1
Diversigen Inc., Houston, TX 77021, USA
2
Alkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3
Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
4
Diversigen Inc., Saint Paul, MN 55112, USA
5
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
6
Biotechnology Institute, College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2020, 11(11), 1380; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111380
Received: 3 November 2020 / Revised: 17 November 2020 / Accepted: 18 November 2020 / Published: 21 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Microbiome Analysis Techniques and Discovery)
Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene (16S) has long been a go-to method for microbiome characterization due to its accessibility and lower cost compared to shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMS). However, 16S sequencing rarely provides species-level resolution and cannot provide direct assessment of other taxa (e.g., viruses and fungi) or functional gene content. Shallow shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SSMS) has emerged as an approach to bridge the gap between 16S sequencing and deep metagenomic sequencing. SSMS is cost-competitive with 16S sequencing, while also providing species-level resolution and functional gene content insights. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of sequencing depth on marker gene-mapping- and alignment-based annotation of bacteria in healthy human stool samples. The number of identified taxa decreased with lower sequencing depths, particularly with the marker gene-mapping-based approach. Other annotations, including viruses and pathways, also showed a depth-dependent effect on feature recovery. These results refine the understanding of the suitability and shortcomings of SSMS, as well as annotation tools for metagenomic analyses in human stool samples. Results may also translate to other sample types and may open the opportunity to explore the effect of sequencing depth and annotation method. View Full-Text
Keywords: alignment; marker gene; microbiome; shallow sequencing; shotgun metagenomic sequencing; virome alignment; marker gene; microbiome; shallow sequencing; shotgun metagenomic sequencing; virome
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Santiago-Rodriguez, T.M.; Garoutte, A.; Adams, E.; Nasser, W.; Ross, M.C.; La Reau, A.; Henseler, Z.; Ward, T.; Knights, D.; Petrosino, J.F.; Hollister, E.B. Metagenomic Information Recovery from Human Stool Samples Is Influenced by Sequencing Depth and Profiling Method. Genes 2020, 11, 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111380

AMA Style

Santiago-Rodriguez TM, Garoutte A, Adams E, Nasser W, Ross MC, La Reau A, Henseler Z, Ward T, Knights D, Petrosino JF, Hollister EB. Metagenomic Information Recovery from Human Stool Samples Is Influenced by Sequencing Depth and Profiling Method. Genes. 2020; 11(11):1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111380

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santiago-Rodriguez, Tasha M., Aaron Garoutte, Emmase Adams, Waleed Nasser, Matthew C. Ross, Alex La Reau, Zachariah Henseler, Tonya Ward, Dan Knights, Joseph F. Petrosino, and Emily B. Hollister. 2020. "Metagenomic Information Recovery from Human Stool Samples Is Influenced by Sequencing Depth and Profiling Method" Genes 11, no. 11: 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111380

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop