Alveolar Type II Cells or Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Comparison of Two Different Cell Therapies for the Treatment of Acute Lung Injury in Rats

The use of cell therapies has recently increased for the treatment of pulmonary diseases. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) and alveolar type II cells (ATII) are the main cell-based therapies used for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Many pre-clinical studies have shown that both therapies generate positive outcomes; however, the differences in the efficiency of MSCs or ATII for reducing lung damage remains to be studied. We compared the potential of both cell therapies, administering them using the same route and dose and equal time points in a sustained acute lung injury (ALI) model. We found that the MSCs and ATII cells have similar therapeutic effects when we tested them in a hydrochloric acid and lipopolysaccharide (HCl-LPS) two-hit ALI model. Both therapies were able to reduce proinflammatory cytokines, decrease neutrophil infiltration, reduce permeability, and moderate hemorrhage and interstitial edema. Although MSCs and ATII cells have been described as targeting different cellular and molecular mechanisms, our data indicates that both cell therapies are successful for the treatment of ALI, with similar beneficial results. Understanding direct cell crosstalk and the factors released from each cell will open the door to more accurate drugs being able to target specific pathways and offer new curative options for ARDS.


Introduction
Cell-based therapies have gained interest in the last few years for the treatment of several lung diseases. Multipotent mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have been used for the treatment of lung diseases, and their use has rapidly progressed over the past decade [1][2][3][4][5][6]. MSCs modulate  (1) Control: saline instillation at 0, 2, and 9 h; (2) Control + MSCs: saline instillation at 0 and 2 h followed by MSC instillation after 9 h; (3) Control + ATII: saline instillation at 0 and 2 h followed by ATII cell instillation after 9 h; (4) HCl + LPS: HCl instillation at 0 h, LPS administration at 2 h, and saline instillation after 9 h; (5) HCl + LPS + MSCs: HCl + LPS, as in the previous group, plus MSC instillation after 9 h; (6) HCl + LPS + ATII: HCl + LPS, as in the previous group, plus ATII cell instillation after 9 h. The following section describes the experiments as they were conducted.

HCl and LPS Induced ALI and Cell Infusion
ALI was induced as in our previous study [54]. The animals received an intratracheal instillation of 300 µL of HCl (0.1 M at pH = 1.4), and 2 h later an intratracheal instillation of the endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS; Escherichia coli 055:B5, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA, 30 µg/g of body weight) dissolved in 500 µL of saline under sevoflurane anesthesia. The control animals received the same volume of saline. During the experiment, the animal body weights were recorded every day. Nine hours after the endotracheal HCl administration (or saline, in the case of control animals), recipient animals were transplanted with ATII cells or MSCs endotracheally by the trans-oral route under sevoflurane anesthesia. Each animal received a single bolus of 2.5 × 10 6 cells (ATII or MSCs; after knowing the purity and using the appropriate calculations. we administered 2.5 × 10 6 pure cells) suspended in 400 µL of sterile saline. The control groups received the same dose of cells. The animals were killed 72 h after the induction of ALI.

Isolation and Purification of Alveolar Type II Cells
As previously described, fresh ATII cells were isolated from healthy donor animals [17]. Briefly, the lungs were removed and five bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) with 10 mL of saline were performed. The lungs were digested with 0.25% trypsin (T8003; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in saline (60 mL), keeping the lungs submerged in a saline bath at 37 • C for 30 min to keep the temperature stable during the process. The lungs were chopped in 1-2 mm 2 pieces, treated with 25 mL of DNase (75 U/mL) (Roche Diagnostics, Manheim, Germany), and filtered through 100 and 40 µm nylon meshes. Centrifuge cell separation was performed using Percoll, the enriched cell band population was mixed with DNase solution (20 U/mL) and centrifuged at 500× g for 15 min, and the pellet was resuspended in 5 mL of DCCM-1 (Biological Industries, Kibbutz Beit Haemek, Israel) supplemented with 2% L-glutamine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and subjected to differential attachment on a plastic Petri dish. No adherent ATII cells were collected after 1 h, and they were counted to establish the final yield of freshly purified cells and administered fresh to the animals. The ATII cell viability was evaluated with trypan blue (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and its purity by alkaline phosphatase staining (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and the expression of surfactant C (SPC, Santa Cruz, USA, ref sc-13979, rabbit, 1:100) was measured by immunofluorescence and marked by the secondary anti-rabbit antibody (Santa Cruz, 136 USA, ref. sc2359. FITC, 1:100). SPC is observed in green (FITC) in Figure 1C and the stained nuclei with Hoechst33342 (Life technologies) ( Figure 1B,C). The purity of the ATII cells was 86 ± 3%.

Isolation and Purification of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Differentiation to Osteocytes, Chondrocytes, and Adipocytes
Femurs were obtained from healthy donor animals. After the removal of the peripheral muscle tissue, the femurs were briefly soaked with alcohol. Bone marrow was isolated by flushing the bones with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The bone marrow suspension was filtered with a 100-mesh filter and then centrifuged. The pellets were resuspended in growth medium composed of DMEM (Gibco, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), and the cells were plated in T75 flasks followed by incubating at 37 • C and 5% CO2. After 48 h, the media were changed every 3 days until 80-90% confluence. After 1 week, MSCs were detached to the plate and administered to the animals. The purity of the MSCs was tested by their ability to adhere to plastic in standard culture medium and by the expression of CD44 ( Figure 1D. The nuclei were stained using Hoechst33342 (Life technologies), and we counted at least 500 cells using a fluorescence microscope and calculate the percentage of purity. The purity of MSCs was 78 ± 5%.
The MSCs' capacity to differentiate into osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic lineages was also evaluated [28]. Confluent MSCs were cultured at 37 • C and 5% CO2 with the respective differentiation media: a StemPro The cells were washed with current water, incubated with hematoxylin for 1 min, and rinsed with current water. After 14 days, chondrocytes were fixed for 30 min with 4% formalin, washed with DPBS, stained for 30 min with 1% Alcian Blue, and rinsed with 0.1 N HCl and distilled water. After 21 days, osteocytes were washed with DPBS, fixed for 30 min with 4% formalin, washed with distilled water, stained for 2 min with 2% Alizarin Red, and washed with distilled water. The preparations were mounted and imaged using a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope ( Figure 1E).

Endpoint
The animals were anesthetized intraperitoneally with ketamine (90 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) and were exsanguinated from the abdominal aorta at 72 h. The lungs were removed and weighed. Then, the left hilum was tied with a suture, and the right lung was removed and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The left lung was washed with five separate 5 mL aliquots of 0.9% NaCl containing 1mM EDTA for BAL collection or fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for histological analysis.

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Analysis
The BAL fluid samples were processed, and we counted the total cells. Lymphocytes, polymorphonuclear, and monocytes/macrophages were evaluated and counted in cytospin preparations stained with the diff-quick method (Pancreac Quimica SAU; Spain). The total protein concentration in BAL fluid was determined by the bicinchoninic acid method (BCA) (Pierce; Thermo Scientific; Rockford, IL, USA). The concentration of IgM in BAL fluid was measured using an ELISA (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The myeloperoxidase (MPO) concentration in BAL fluid was determined with an ELISA assay (Hycult Biotech, Uden, The Netherlands) following the manufacturer's instructions.

Histological Studies
The unilobular lungs were embedded in paraffin and 4 µm-thick histological sections were obtained. They were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and evaluated under bright field microscopy using a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope. The images were evaluated using the ImageJ software (ImageJ 1.40 g; W. Rasband, NIH, USA). The lung injury score (LIS) was quantified by a two blinded investigator using Table 1. The LIS was obtained by the sum of each of the five independent variables (hemorrhage, peribronchial infiltration, interstitial edema, pneumocyte hyperplasia, and intra-alveolar infiltration) and was normalized to the number of fields evaluated. The resulting injury score was a value between zero and 10 (both inclusive). Table 1. Lung injury scoring system.

Parameter
Score Per Field Immunofluorescence staining for surfactant C (SPC) was performed to detect ATII cells in the lung parenchyma. Deparaffinized sections were rehydrated, heated at 60 • C for 20 min in antigen retrieval buffer with 0.1 M sodium citrate and 0.1% Triton X-100, rinsed with PBS, and blocked with a solution of 3% FBS and 1% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. Next, the sections were incubated with the primary antibody SPC ( The detection of fragmented DNA in situ was performed using a TUNEL (Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling) fluorescent assay following the manufacturer's protocol (Roche Applied Science, Barcelona, Spain). Sections were mounted with Fluoromount Aqueous Mounting Medium (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA), and the detection of positive cells for TUNEL in green (FITC) was performed using a confocal microscope (Leica DMi8) at 630× magnification.

Protein Extraction and Quantification from Lung Homogenates
Protein was extracted from the lung tissue using a lysis buffer containing 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (1 tablet for 250 mg of lung tissue) (Roche; Mannheim, Germany), 0.5% Triton X-100, 150 mM of NaCl, 15 mM of Tris, 1 mM of CaCl2, and 50 mM of MgCl2 (pH 7.4) with a hand-held homogenizer. After 30 min at 4 • C incubation, the homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000× g at 4 • C for 20 min and then filtered with 0.45 µm Nanosep filters (Pall ® Life Sciences; Madrid, Spain). The total protein concentration in the lung homogenates was measured by the bicinchoninic acid method (BCA, Pierce; Thermo Scientific; Rockford, IL, USA). The cytokines were measured in lung homogenates using a Procarta rat cytokine kit (Affymetrix Inc.; Santa Clara, CA, USA) in a multiplex magnetic bead immunoassay (Luminex; Rafer, Spain) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The amount of chemokines is expressed and corrected by the µg of protein measured at the whole lysate).

Statistical Analysis of Results
GraphPad-Prism7 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for statistical analysis. The data were tested for Gaussian distribution applying by the D'Agostino-Pearson omnibus or Shapiro-Wilk normality testing. After we tested the data for normal distribution, we performed a one-way analysis of variance (one-way-ANOVA), followed by appropriate post-hoc tests, including the Newman-Keuls test when the differences were significant (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. The results of the quantitative variables were expressed as the mean ±SEM.

Effect of Both Bell Therapies in Body and Lung Weight and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Analysis
Both cell types stabilized the body weight of injured animals at 48 h, which suggests the recovery of the animals. The injured animals instilled with HCL and LPS kept losing weight between 48 h and 72 h (Figure 2A). All the control groups gained some grams over the three days of the experiment; the three control groups are plotted together to facilitate data interpretation (Figure 2A). ALI caused the death of 50% of the rats, and survival was improved slightly by both cell therapies; no differences were observed between the treatments ( Figure 2B). ATII cell and MSCs administration significantly reduced the ratio of lung weight/body weight (signal of lung damage), which was significantly increased in the injured and non-treated animals. Both cell therapies reduced the lung weight/body weight to the control values ( Figure 2C). Lung permeability is one of the hallmarks of ALI, and our ALI-animal model presented a significant increase in the total protein and IgM (a big protein used to measure permeability) on the BAL ( Figure 2D,E). Both cell therapies were able to significantly reduce the amount of IgM on the BAL and moderately decrease the total protein concentration, suggesting a reduction in permeability with less alveolar epithelial layer impairment ( Figure 2D,E). A cell analysis was performed to evaluate the proportion of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages on the BAL. The HCL + LPS group showed a noteworthy increase in the proportion of neutrophils in comparison to the other white cells analyzed that was significantly reverted after the ATII or MSC treatment ( Figure 2F). No changes were observed in the total percentage of lymphocytes in any group. Additionally, we measured myeloperoxidase (MPO) as an index of neutrophil activity and an indirect indicator of lung injury. The MPO results are consistent with the number of neutrophils in the BAL, reinforcing our observations that both cell therapies reduce neutrophil infiltration and activation ( Figure 2G).

MSCs and ATII Cells Diminished Inflammation after Lung Damage
We measured several proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory growth factors and chemokines related to acute lung damage in lung homogenates. Both cell therapies produced a significant decrease in the protein expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines-IFNγ, IL-1β, and IL-6-at 72 h that were significantly induced by lung injury ( Figure 3A). No changes were observed between the reductions induced by both cell therapies. The anti-inflammatory markers evaluated did not show any change induced by any treatment and were also not modified for the administration of HCl and LPS to induce the ALI ( Figure 3B). The protein expression of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), responsible for neutrophil and monocyte/macrophage maturation, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), involved in de novo monocyte recruitment, were both significantly increased in our disease ALI animal model. GM-CSF expression was not detected (ND) in the control groups because the concentrations were under the detection limit. The MSC therapy significantly reduced both factors. ATII cell therapy also reduced both factors, but only MCP-1 expression reached statistical significance. No changes were observed in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) protein expression in any groups ( Figure 3C).

MSC and ATII Cell Therapies Improved Lung Damage and Restore Lung Architecture
To further assess the effect of both cell therapies on the improvement of ALI, we evaluated several histological lung sections and quantified the representative hallmarks for ALI using a lung injury score (LIS) ( Table 1). We screened all the sections with a small magnification to quantify the breadth of the damage ( Figure 4A), then we focused on the most representative areas to evaluate the cited parameters with a higher magnification ( Figure 4B). Both the cell therapies triggered a recovery of the lung structure compared to the injured and non-treated animals that were ATII cell-positive for surfactant C in the corners of the alveoli ( Figure 4C). Multifocal lesions were still present in lungs transplanted with MSC or ATII cells, although, compared with non-transplanted animals, less edema, a smaller number of inflammatory cells, and considerably less hemorrhage were observed. As expected, lung tissue sections from rats with ALI showed a vast peribronchiolar and interstitial infiltration with inflammatory cells, hemorrhage, interstitial edema, and ATII cell hyperplasia in practically all the lung section. The reduction in lung lesions in both the cell-treated groups was evidenced by large areas of undamaged tissue with normal alveolar architecture ( Figure 4A,B). Additionally, apoptotic cells were visualized by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining, and overall almost no apoptotic cells were observed in the controls or transplanted animals, but a higher number of TUNEL+ cells were observed in the lungs of HCl+LPS animals ( Figure 4D). A score evaluating the different parameters was performed with relevant and significant differences between the transplanted and non-transplanted animals in the ALI model ( Figure 4E). Both therapies showed a comparable outcome in the analyzed parameter with comparable LIS scores, suggesting a similar tissue recovery. . Data are representative from 3 independent experiments (mean ± SEM; each point represents one animal). ANOVA followed by a Newman-Keuls multiple-comparison test was used to evaluate the significant differences * p < 0.01 vs. the corresponding control group (no differences among the three controls groups was observed in any parameter evaluated); # p < 0.01 vs. the HCl + LPS group.

MSCs and ATII Cells Diminished Inflammation after Lung Damage
We measured several proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory growth factors and chemokines related to acute lung damage in lung homogenates. Both cell therapies produced a significant decrease in the protein expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines-IFNγ, IL-1β, and IL-6-at 72 h that were significantly induced by lung injury (Figure 3A). No changes were observed between the reductions induced by both cell therapies. The anti-inflammatory markers evaluated did not show . Data are representative from 3 independent experiments (mean ± SEM; each point represents one animal). ANOVA followed by a Newman-Keuls multiple-comparison test was used to evaluate the significant differences * p < 0.01 vs. the corresponding control group (no differences among the three controls groups was observed in any parameter evaluated); # p < 0.01 vs. the HCl + LPS group. for the statistical analysis, the ND value was used as the detection limit concentration. Data are representative from 2 independent experiments (n = 5-6 per group; mean ± SEM). One-way ANOVA followed by a Newman-Keuls multiple-comparison test was used to evaluate the significant differences * p < 0.01 vs. the corresponding control group (no differences among the three controls groups were observed in any parameter evaluated); # p < 0.01 vs. the HCl + LPS group. , and in white the autofluorescence to be able to identify the lung structures. The yellow arrows indicate SPC+ cells in the corners of the alveoli, a normal position for ATII. In the controls and transplanted groups, almost one cell per alveoli can be observed, but not in the injured and non-treated lungs. (D) TUNEL staining to detect apoptotic cells was performed; the pictures show "healthy" areas near an injured area for the three groups instilled with HCl + PS. In green, TUNEL+ cells are shown and they are highlighted with a small yellow arrow. In blue, the autofluorescence is shown to allow us to identify the lung structures. (E) Lung injury score, evaluating haemorrhage, peribronchial infiltration, interstial edema, pneumocyte hyperplasia, and intraalveolar infiltration, as described in Table 1. Data are representative from 2 independent experiments (mean ± SEM; each point represents one animal, n = 5-6). One-way-ANOVA followed by a Newman-Keuls multiple-comparison test was used to evaluate the significant differences * p < 0.01 vs. the corresponding control group; # p < 0.01 vs. the HCl + LPS group.

Discussion
We found that MSCs and ATII cells have a similar therapeutic potential for the treatment of ALI when tested in a sustained HCl-LPS two-hit ALI model at 72 h. Both therapies were able to effectively reduce inflammation and neutrophil infiltration and recovered permeability and tissue damage. These findings are completely novel, and to our knowledge it is the first time that both therapies were compared in an identical pre-clinical ALI model using the same cell dose and route of administration. Taken together, these data offer a positive insight concerning the therapeutic and beneficial use of cell therapies for ARDS. Cell therapies have been shown to be a powerful therapeutic for several diseases, including many pulmonary diseases [2,6,14,42].
In this study, we evaluated the effect of cell therapies on important characteristics of human lung injury that were reproduced in our animal model [55]. We have demonstrated that both therapies , and in white the autofluorescence to be able to identify the lung structures. The yellow arrows indicate SPC+ cells in the corners of the alveoli, a normal position for ATII. In the controls and transplanted groups, almost one cell per alveoli can be observed, but not in the injured and non-treated lungs. (D) TUNEL staining to detect apoptotic cells was performed; the pictures show "healthy" areas near an injured area for the three groups instilled with HCl + PS. In green, TUNEL+ cells are shown and they are highlighted with a small yellow arrow. In blue, the autofluorescence is shown to allow us to identify the lung structures. (E) Lung injury score, evaluating haemorrhage, peribronchial infiltration, interstial edema, pneumocyte hyperplasia, and intraalveolar infiltration, as described in Table 1. Data are representative from 2 independent experiments (mean ± SEM; each point represents one animal, n = 5-6). One-way-ANOVA followed by a Newman-Keuls multiple-comparison test was used to evaluate the significant differences * p < 0.01 vs. the corresponding control group; # p < 0.01 vs. the HCl + LPS group.

Discussion
We found that MSCs and ATII cells have a similar therapeutic potential for the treatment of ALI when tested in a sustained HCl-LPS two-hit ALI model at 72 h. Both therapies were able to effectively reduce inflammation and neutrophil infiltration and recovered permeability and tissue damage. These findings are completely novel, and to our knowledge it is the first time that both therapies were compared in an identical pre-clinical ALI model using the same cell dose and route of administration. Taken together, these data offer a positive insight concerning the therapeutic and beneficial use of cell therapies for ARDS. Cell therapies have been shown to be a powerful therapeutic for several diseases, including many pulmonary diseases [2,6,14,42].
In this study, we evaluated the effect of cell therapies on important characteristics of human lung injury that were reproduced in our animal model [55]. We have demonstrated that both therapies have similar outcomes in the parameters evaluated. Both cellular therapies were able to partially stabilize the loss of body weight of the animals and decreased the mortality compared to the injured animals. The MSCs and ATII infusion reduced the lung permeability, which was observed as a measure of IgM and total protein in the alveolar lavage and quantified in the histological sections. The restoration of the alveolar damage depends on the equilibrium of pro-inflammatory/anti-inflammatory interactions and the modulation of many molecular pathways [43,49,56]. ARDS is characterized by an increase in IFNγ, IL-1β, and IL-6, and our pre-clinical animal ALI model shows a significant increase in the three of them [52,54,56]. The pulmonary edema fluid from ALI animals has high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNFα among others; protective therapies were shown to decrease IL-6 and IL-8 in ALI and ARDS [52,55,56]. In this study, MSCs and ATII reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines amounts in lung tissue, suggesting an improvement in lung injury damage. The reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines correlates with the decrease in neutrophil infiltration and MPO in the alveolar space and a decrease in intra-alveolar and parabronchial infiltered inflammatory cells in the histological analysis. Additionally, we observed functional ATII cells in the alveoli in all transplanted groups and overall less apoptotic cells in the lunch parenchyma. We did not observe differences between both cell therapies in the parameters evaluated, and the lung damage resolution observed in our transplanted animals and the decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines supports our conclusion that MSC and ATII have similar therapeutic effects.
We, among others, have published the potential use of ATII cells in lung regeneration due to their ability to differentiate to alveolar type I cells and due to their abilities to secrete surfactant, which has immune-modulatory and biomechanical functions [18,24,57]. ATII cells act as immune modulators, regulating the activation of alveolar macrophages by releasing soluble factors [19]. Many studies have been published concerning the therapeutic functions of MSCs for pulmonary diseases. Numerous pre-clinical ALI models were treated with MSCs using different doses and administration routes and reported positive outcomes; all of these studies stated different mechanisms of action of these cells [7][8][9][10]13,43,44,[58][59][60][61]., ALI in experimental models has many characteristics that can benefit from both cell therapies, and treatment with these cell therapies have shown positive results so far.
Both therapies present the potential for treating patients with ARDS, but still many key challenges and a better understanding of cellular and molecular mechanism need to be addressed. In general, obtaining and maintaining MSCs in cell culture is much easier compared to ATII [62,63]. MSCs can be isolated from several adult tissues and from fetal tissues, while ATII cells are acquired from an adult´s healthy donor lungs or can be derived in vitro from pluripotent cells [35,62]. Due to the MSC immune-privileged behavior, it is possible an autologous or allogenic treatment that avoids the use of immunosuppression in patients [16,62]. The risk of the uncontrolled proliferation of MSCs and possible migration to other tissues is mitigated by the use of ATII cells. ATII are more differentiated cells than MSCs, and their characteristics make it impossible for them to survive in other organs, except the lung. Many logistic issues need to be addressed, such as the maintenance of the cells and the dose that needs to be administered, and in order to determine an appropriate administration and maintenance schedule [36,37].
Our study highlights that different cell therapies, which have been described as targeting different cellular and molecular mechanisms, appear to have similar positive effects. This study has some limitations: we do not clarify the specific mechanisms and we did not combine the ATII and MSCs into a single administration, which might enhance the positive observed effects and underline a synergistic effect between both cells. Understanding direct cell crosstalk and the factors released from each cell will open the door to the more accurate drug targeting of a specific pathway. We used a two hit model to reproduce as much ARDS heterogeneity as possible; we are aware that we used a sterile ALI model, and a more harmful infection model such as pneumonia or a non-sterile sepsis model might benefit from the ATII or MSCs differently. A confirmatory study with a non-sterile ALI model will support our conclusions and maybe call attention to the possible differences between both cell therapies.

Conclusions
In conclusion, we demonstrated that both cell therapies are successful for the treatment of ALI, with similar beneficial results and effectiveness when we administered them using the same route and dose and when we evaluated the fallouts at the same time point. Our data suggests that both cells induce the same outcome when they are administered as a therapy for acute lung injury and, as shown in previous studies, the fact that they act on different pathways and with different mechanisms of action does not change the outcome. Increasing and combining our knowledge about the compounds secreted and pathways activated by each cell therapy, we speculate that we may be able to offer new curative options in the near future for the resolution of ARDS. Funding: This work was supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad-Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI12/02548 to A.A., and PI12/02451 and PI15/00482 to R.H.), by the Spanish Society of Critical Care (SEMICYUC); we also got funding from Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), Marta Camprubí got a PhD grant by Catalan Society of Pneumology (SOCAP); the CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias and a grant from Fundació Parc Taulí obtained by Ferranda Puig supported also this study.