You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Cells
  • Review
  • Open Access

13 June 2021

Current Understandings of Core Pathways for the Activation of Mammalian Primordial Follicles

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Center for Energy Metabolism and Reproduction, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
2
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Fertility Regulation, Center of Assisted Reproduction and Embryology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Haiyuan First Road 1, Shenzhen 518053, China
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
4
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Metabolic Health, Shenzhen 518055, China
This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanism of Oocyte Maturation

Abstract

The mammalian ovary has two main functions—producing mature oocytes for fertilization and secreting hormones for maintaining the ovarian endocrine functions. Both functions are vital for female reproduction. Primordial follicles are composed of flattened pre-granulosa cells and a primary oocyte, and activation of primordial follicles is the first step in follicular development and is the key factor in determining the reproductive capacity of females. The recent identification of the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) signaling pathway as the key controller for follicular activation has made the study of primordial follicle activation a hot research topic in the field of reproduction. This review systematically summarizes the roles of the PI3K/PTEN signaling pathway in primordial follicle activation and discusses how the pathway interacts with various other molecular networks to control follicular activation. Studies on the activation of primordial follicles have led to the development of methods for the in vitro activation of primordial follicles as a treatment for infertility in women with premature ovarian insufficiency or poor ovarian response, and these are also discussed along with some practical applications of our current knowledge of follicular activation.

1. Introduction: The Development of Primordial Follicles Is Essential for Female Reproduction

The mammalian ovary is a key component of the female reproductive system and contains follicles at various developmental stages [1]. In addition to its role in producing mature oocytes, the ovary is also responsible for synthesizing and secreting hormones that are vital to reproductive development and fertility [2,3,4].
Follicles are the functional units of ovaries, and in most mammalian species primordial follicles are formed before or shortly after birth [5]. A large number of primordial follicles progressively occupy more peripheral parts of the ovary to create the primordial follicle pool [6], and the primordial follicle pool is considered to be the only source of germ cells for fertilization [5]. Although this theory has been challenged over the past decade [7,8], the latest research by Zhang et al. supports the traditional view that no follicular renewal occurs in postnatal life in mice and humans [9,10].
Once the primordial follicle pool is formed, the primordial follicles have three possible developmental fates—to maintain a quiescent state as primordial follicles, to be activated and enter the growth phase, or to undergo death [11]. The balance between the dormancy, activation, and death of primordial follicles is considered to be the decisive factor in determining the length of female reproductive life [12,13]. In humans, the initial primordial follicle pool at birth contains approximately 500,000–1,000,000 follicles in total. To maintain the lengthy reproductive lifespan of female mammals, most of the primordial follicles remain in a dormant state in the ovaries. Eventually, more than 99% of the primordial follicles will die with age, and this is referred to as ovarian aging [14,15]. In mammals, the quantity and quality of the primordial follicle pool determine the length of reproductive life [16,17], and menopause occurs in human females when the number of primordial follicles drops below approximately 1000 [18].

2. Activation of Primordial Follicles

The activation of primordial follicles and subsequent follicular development is an irreversible process [2]. The characteristics of follicular activation include the transformation of granulosa cells from a flattened to a cuboidal shape and an increase in oocyte volume [19,20]. Recent studies tracing the development of follicles have shown that there are two distinct populations of primordial follicles in the mouse ovary. The first wave of primordial follicles in the medulla of the ovary begins to be activated once they are formed, whereas the primordial follicles in the ovarian cortex are gradually activated over the course of the female reproductive lifespan [21,22].
Only a small proportion of primordial follicles are recruited into the growing follicle pool [16,23], and the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) signaling pathway in oocytes plays a critical role in primordial follicle activation [24]. Studies have shown that PI3K signaling might be the only pathway for oocyte activation [25]. Once the PI3K/PTEN signaling pathway is activated, it can convert phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) into phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3), which activates Akt and phosphorylates downstream forkhead transcription factor Foxo3. Foxo3 shuttles from the nucleus into the cytoplasm, resulting in primordial follicle activation [11,26]. The mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling pathway is another crucial pathway that initiates primordial follicle activation in pre-granulosa cells by activating PI3K/PTEN signaling [27]. In this article, we elaborate on the important roles of these two signaling pathways in primordial follicle activation.

3. The PI3K/PTEN Signaling in Oocytes Governs the Primordial Follicle Activation

According to their structural characteristics and substrate specificity, PI3Ks are divided into three classes (I, II, and III) [28]. Among them, class I PI3Ks are also divided into two subfamilies, class IA and class IB. Class IA PI3Ks, which are the most well-studied PI3Ks, are lipid kinases that consist of a p85 regulatory subunit and a p110 catalytic subunit, and they phosphorylate the 3′-OH group on the inositol ring of inositol phospholipids [29,30,31]. The p110 catalytic subunit can convert PIP2 into PIP3 [11,32]. PIP3 recruits both phosphatidylinositol-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1) and the protein serine–threonine kinase Akt to the cell membrane, where PDK1 phosphorylates and activates Akt [29,33]. Akt subsequently phosphorylates a range of substrates, including the cell-cycle inhibitor p27 (also known as p27KIP1), glycogen synthase kinase 3, tuberous sclerosis 2 (TSC2), and the forkhead box transcription factors (FOXO) families [34,35,36,37]. The PI3K signaling network is thus important for cell proliferation, cell cycle entry, and cell survival [38,39].
As a negative regulator of PI3K function, PTEN reverts PIP3 back to PIP2 and thus suppresses PI3K signaling [40,41]. For many decades, much attention has been focused on the role of PTEN as a tumor suppressor in cancers [38,42], but its key role in ovarian primordial follicle activation was not elucidated until 2008. Studies from Diego Castrillion’s group and Kui Liu’s group showed that oocyte-specific knockout of the Pten gene results in over-activation of the entire pool of primordial follicles, and this is followed by the premature depletion of all the primordial follicles, thus revealing the important roles of PI3K and PTEN in follicular activation [24,26] (Figure 1). Subsequently, the role of PTEN in primordial follicle activation has been demonstrated in other species. Bovine ovary fragments exposed to vanadate-derived dipotassium bisperoxo (5-hydroxy-pyridine-2-carboxylic) oxovanadate (V) (bpV(HOpic)), an inhibitor of PTEN, showed a significantly higher proportion of growing follicles compared to control, but was associated with DNA damage and impaired DNA repair competence [43]. For pig and sheep ovarian tissues, bpV(HOpic) affects ovarian follicle development by promoting the initiation of follicle development [44,45]. These large animal models may be helpful to optimize the follicular activation methods for transfer to clinical application. In humans, inhibition of PTEN with bpV(HOpic) affects human ovarian follicle development by promoting the initiation of follicle growth to the secondary stage, but the survival of isolated secondary follicles was severely affected [46]. However, a short-term study showed bpV(HOpic) treatment enhances the activation of primordial follicles in both fresh and cryopreserved human ovarian cortex, and enlarges growing populations without inducing apoptosis in follicles [47].
Figure 1. PI3K/PTEN signaling controls the activation of primordial follicles in the ovary. In dormant oocytes (left), PTEN reverts PIP2 back to PIP3 and prevents follicular activation. The downstream transcription factor Foxo3 is expressed in the nucleus. In growing oocytes (right), the PI3K–Akt signaling pathway is activated by converting PIP2 to PIP3. PIP3 then recruits both PDK1 and Akt to the cell membrane where PDK1 phosphorylates and activates Akt, resulting in Foxo3 hyperphosphorylation and nuclear export, which triggers the activation of the primordial follicle.
The forkhead transcription factor Foxo3 is a substrate of Akt and is an important factor downstream of the PI3K/PTEN signaling pathway, and it plays a specific and essential role in follicular activation [48,49]. The PI3K signaling pathway controls primordial follicle activation through Foxo3. Foxo3 is imported into the nucleus during primordial follicle formation and then is exported to the cytoplasm upon activation. [41]. Foxo3–/– female mice present with an ovarian phenotype of global follicular activation leading to oocyte death, early follicle depletion, and infertility [50]. Using immunofluorescence techniques, we double stained the ovarian sections of PD8 mice with Foxo3 and DDX4. Consistent with previous reports, our results show that Foxo3 shuttles from the nucleus into the cytoplasm once the follicles are activated (Figure 2).
Figure 2. The expression of Foxo3 in primordial follicles and growing follicles. Foxo3 (green) is expressed in the nucleus of primordial follicles. In growing follicles, Foxo3 is translocated to the cytoplasm. DDX4 (red) was used as the germ cell marker, and DAPI (blue) was used to stain DNA. Arrowheads: oocyte cytoplasm with Foxo3. Arrows: oocyte nuclei with Foxo3. Scale bars: 50 µm.

4. TSC–mTORC1 Signaling in Pre-Granulosa Cells Initiates Primordial Follicle Activation

mTORC1 is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell growth and metabolism by promoting various metabolic processes such as protein, lipid, and organelle biosynthesis [51]. In mammals, mTORC1 activates p70 S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) and ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6) and inactivates eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (4E-BPs) to promote protein synthesis, ribosomal biogenesis, and cell growth [52,53].
In cells, mTORC1 is negatively regulated by a heterodimer complex consisting of TSC1 and TSC2 [51], which are the products of the tumor suppressor genes Tsc1 and Tsc2 [54]. The TSC1/TSC2 complex inhibits the activation of mTORC1 through the GTPase-activating protein domain of TSC2, and TSC1 maintains the stability of TSC2 by preventing its ubiquitination and degradation [55]. Some studies have shown that conditional knockout of Tsc1 or Tsc2 in mouse oocytes leads to the global activation of primordial follicles around the time of puberty, thus resulting in follicular depletion in early adulthood [56,57]. Moreover, deletion of Tsc1 in pre-granulosa cells also results in overall primordial follicle activation [27], further suggesting that the TSC1/TSC2 complex plays an important role in regulating primordial follicular activation.
Another study from Liu’s group showed that conditional knockout of Rptor (mTOR regulatory protein complex 1) in pre-granulosa cells can inactivate mTORC1 signaling, and this suppresses follicular activation and prevents the awakening of dormant oocytes [27,58]. However, the inactivation of mTORC1 activity by deletion of Rptor in oocytes does not affect follicular development or female reproductive capacity [59]. These results suggest that mTORC1 signaling in pre-granulosa cells is essential for the activation of primordial follicles.
The first stage in primordial follicle activation is the differentiation and proliferation of pre-granulosa cells, which is followed by oocyte growth in the ovary [60,61,62]. Zhang et al. demonstrated that mTORC1 signaling in pre-granulosa cells activates Kit receptor on the oocyte surface by enhancing the expression of KIT ligand (KITL) in pre-granulosa cells from Tsc1−/− mouse ovaries [27]. They then crossed Tsc1−/− mice with KitY719F/KitY719F mice to further determine how the KITL–KIT and the intraoocyte PI3K signaling pathways function to awaken dormant oocytes. Phosphorylation of KIT Y719 is responsible for activating the downstream PI3K signaling, and KitY719F/KitY719F mice carry a point mutation that prevents this phosphorylation [27]. The Y719F mutation in the pre-granulosa cells of Tsc1–/–, KitY719F/KitY719F mice prevented the KIT-mediated activation of PI3K in oocytes. Thus, binding of KITL to Kit receptor results in the phosphorylation of KIT Y719, and this further activates PI3K signaling in mouse oocytes. The activated PI3K phosphorylates Akt, and this leads to the shuttling of Foxo3 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm resulting in the activation of primordial follicles [27] (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Pre-granulosa cells initiate the activation of primordial follicles through mTORC1–KITL in pre-granulosa cells and KIT Y719–PI3K in oocytes. In dormant follicles (left), the mTORC1 signaling in pre-granulosa cells is suppressed, and only a low level of KITL is expressed by pre-granulosa cells, which is insufficient to activate KIT Y719 on oocytes. KIT Y719 is not phosphorylated and the intraoocyte PI3K signaling is suppressed in this situation. In growing follicles (right), activated mTORC1 signaling in the pre-granulosa cells leads to enhanced production of KITL that binds to c-kit and subsequently activates the intraoocyte PI3K signaling through phosphorylation of KIT Y719. Activated PI3K signaling in oocytes awakens the dormant oocytes.

6. Application of In Vitro Activation of Primordial Follicles in the Treatment of Poor Ovarian Response (POR) and POI

In recent years, more and more women in many societies are delaying marriage and postponing motherhood, and this is increasing the number of women seeking in vitro fertilization (IVF) in order to have their own children. However, IVF cannot help women with POR or POI because they only have undeveloped follicles in their ovaries, and these do not respond to hormones. In recent years, primordial follicle in vitro activation (IVA) has provided a new potential treatment for infertile women with POR and POI. IVA is a new in vitro assisted reproductive technology that treats infertility in POR patients by activating the primordial/small follicles in vitro [135]. Based on studies of the PTEN–PI3K molecular network and the Hippo signaling pathway in the activation of primordial follicles, IVA technology has brought hope for the treatment of infertility in POR patients [66,136].
In 2013, Dr. Aaron Hsueh [66] disrupted the Hippo signaling pathway by fragmenting ovaries followed by Akt stimulation for treating infertility in POI patients. First, the ovaries were removed by laparoscopic surgery and cortical strips were obtained. Histological analyses were performed to detect residual follicles using a small portion of the ovarian cortices, and the rest of the cortical strips were then vitrified and cryopreserved. Before transplantation, the strips were thawed and further cut into 1–2 mm3 cubes followed by treatment with Akt stimulators for two days. The cubes were then autografted beneath the serosa of Fallopian tubes for development into follicles. After antral follicles had appeared, the patients were injected with FSH. With the emergence of preovulatory follicles, hCG was injected for the final maturation of the oocytes. These oocytes were aspirated and used in IVF to form embryos (Figure 4). In their paper, a total of 27 patients participated in the IVA treatment, and 13 of them were found to have follicles in their ovaries by histological analyses. Using IVA methods, the follicles were able to grow and reach the pre-ovulation stage in eight patients (62%). Of these eight patients, mature oocytes were successfully obtained from five patients for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Three of the patients each successfully obtained two embryos, and at the time the article was published one of the patients had a detected pregnancy and one other had successfully delivered a healthy baby.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of IVA. (a) Obtaining ovarian tissues. Under laparoscopic surgery, ovaries were obtained and cut into strips for histology and cryopreservation after vitrification. (b) IVA. After thawing of cryopreserved ovarian strips, the strips were fragmented into 1–2 mm3 cubes and cultured with Akt stimulators for 2 days. (c) Auto-transplantation. After two days of culture, the ovarian cubes were autografted beneath the serosa of the fallopian tubes. (d) Conventional IVF. Follicle growth was stimulated by injection of FSH. When preovulatory follicles were found, mature oocytes were retrieved for IVF to obtain embryos.
Similar results were also observed in a study of IVA including 37 POI patients. Among these patients, 54% still had residual follicles in their ovaries, 9 out of 20 (45%) showed follicular development, and oocytes were successfully obtained from the growing follicles of six patients. Following IVF, embryo transfers were carried out in four patients and three pregnancies were identified that resulted in one miscarriage and two successful deliveries [137]. In 2016, an article reported a simplified IVA protocol for transplanting fresh tissues instead of frozen-thawed tissues. In that paper, 6 out of 14 (43%) patients showed follicular development and four patients had successful oocyte retrieval of six oocytes. Four early embryos were observed after IVF, and after the embryo transfer one patient delivered a healthy boy [138].
In recent years, drug-free IVA, i.e., only fragmentation of the ovarian cortex, has appeared as a simplified IVA procedure for POR and POI patients and has been reported to allow retrieval of more oocytes and to achieve higher pregnancy rates. Drug-free IVA showed that disrupting the Hippo signaling pathway through ovarian cortical fragmentation could effectively promote follicle growth and increase the clinical pregnancy rate. Using this simplified drug-free IVA procedure, two case reports showed successful pregnancies in patients with POI in 2018 and 2019 [139,140]. Another study used a similar drug-free IVA method to treat 20 women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Patients were randomized to have four biopsies taken from one ovary by laparoscopy, followed by fragmentation of the ovarian cortex, then auto transplanted to a peritoneal pocket. The contralateral ovary served as a control. Growth of four follicles was detected in three patients (15%), and one oocyte was retrieved and fertilized, but embryonic development failed [141]. In another paper, follicular growth waves were observed in 9 out of 11 patients (81%) treated with this simplified IVA procedure. One patient showed a natural pregnancy, and 16 embryo transfers in five patients resulted in one live birth, two ongoing pregnancies, and one miscarriage [142]. The paper published by Janisse et al. reported that 7 out of 14 (50%) patients showed follicular development, and five patients had successful retrieval of seven oocytes. Six embryo transfers were carried out in five patients resulting in four pregnancies [143]. Together, these results suggest that the drug-free IVA procedure may be efficient in treating some patients with POI, POR, or DOR. At the 2019 Summit Meeting of Ovarian Disease and Reproductive Health (Shenzhen, China), Dr. Aaron Hsueh showed the effectiveness of drug-free IVA in the treatment of POR and POI patients. This new approach only involves mechanical cutting of the ovarian cortex and does not require tissue culture, and thus only a single surgery is required.
Research into mTORC1 signaling in the activation of primordial follicles has shown that the efficiency of primordial follicle activation can be improved by the combination of mTOR stimulators and PI3K activators [144]. This suggests that combinations of drugs affecting multiple signaling pathways might have a better effect on the activation of primordial follicles. Recently, a review investigated the mechanism of DNA damage surveillance and its association with the PI3K/PTEN signaling pathway, as well as its influence on the DNA damage response (DDR) during primordial follicle activation and ovarian aging. Focusing on the mechanism of DDR in oocytes may provide new approaches to improve the clinical regulation of primordial follicular activation [145].
Although IVA has been used in the treatment of POI patients, there is still much to do to improve this approach. Due to the complex clinical manifestations, complex etiology, and heterogeneity of POI, the application of this technology needs to consider individual differences among patients. The use of drugs for activating primordial follicles might result in negative feedback from downstream effectors. For example, inhibition of PTEN will not always leads to a constant over-activation of the PI3K pathway, but rather the opposite, which might lead to unsatisfactory clinical outcomes and low success rates of IVA.

7. Conclusions

In this review, we highlight the roles of the PI3K/PTEN signaling pathway in primordial follicle activation along with other pathways and factors involved in the regulation of dormancy and the activation of primordial follicles (Figure 5). Primordial follicle activation needs to be further studied because a better understanding of this process will not only help to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying follicular development, but will also facilitate the clinical treatment of infertility, including POR patients. At the same time, more target molecules need to be identified in order to develop more personalized treatments for individual patients.
Figure 5. The roles of other pathways and molecules in primordial follicle activation. The green arrow indicates activation of primordial follicles, and the red arrow indicates inhibition of primordial follicle activation.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC1003703), the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Grant No. RCBS20200714114941343), the Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen, China (SZSM201612083, W.S.B.Y.), the High-Level Hospital Program, Health Commission of Guangdong Province, China (HKUSZH201902018, K.L.), the Shenzhen–Hong Kong Innovation Circle Type D (K.L.), the Shenzhen Project KQTD20190929172749226 (K.L., W.S.B.Y., T.R.W), the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (Grant No. 20184Y0200), grants from the University of Hong Kong (K.L) and grants from Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Metabolic Health.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital (protocol code: hkuszh2020031 and date of approval: 20200412).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Aaron Hsueh and many other colleagues for constructive discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. McGee, E.A.; Hsueh, A.J. Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian follicles. Endocr. Rev. 2000, 21, 200–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shah, J.S.; Sabouni, R.; Cayton Vaught, K.C.; Owen, C.M.; Albertini, D.F.; Segars, J.H. Biomechanics and mechanical signaling in the ovary: A systematic review. J. Assist. Reprod Genet. 2018, 35, 1135–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vanderhyden, B. Molecular basis of ovarian development and function. Front. Biosci. 2002, 7, d2006–d2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Richards, J.S.; Russell, D.L.; Ochsner, S.; Hsieh, M.; Doyle, K.H.; Falender, A.E.; Lo, Y.K.; Sharma, S.C. Novel signaling pathways that control ovarian follicular development, ovulation, and luteinization. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 2002, 57, 195–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Telfer, E.E.; Gosden, R.G.; Byskov, A.G.; Spears, N.; Albertini, D.; Andersen, C.Y.; Anderson, R.; Braw-Tal, R.; Clarke, H.; Gougeon, A.; et al. On regenerating the ovary and generating controversy. Cell 2005, 122, 821–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sforza, C.; Vizzotto, L.; Ferrario, V.F.; Forabosco, A. Position of follicles in normal human ovary during definitive histogenesis. Early Hum. Dev. 2003, 74, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zou, K.; Yuan, Z.; Yang, Z.; Luo, H.; Sun, K.; Zhou, L.; Xiang, J.; Shi, L.; Yu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Production of offspring from a germline stem cell line derived from neonatal ovaries. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 631–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Johnson, J.; Canning, J.; Kaneko, T.; Pru, J.K.; Tilly, J.L. Germline stem cells and follicular renewal in the postnatal mammalian ovary. Nature 2004, 428, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhang, H.; Zheng, W.; Shen, Y.; Adhikari, D.; Ueno, H.; Liu, K. Experimental evidence showing that no mitotically active female germline progenitors exist in postnatal mouse ovaries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 12580–12585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zhang, H.; Panula, S.; Petropoulos, S.; Edsgard, D.; Busayavalasa, K.; Liu, L.; Li, X.; Risal, S.; Shen, Y.; Shao, J.; et al. Adult human and mouse ovaries lack DDX4-expressing functional oogonial stem cells. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 1116–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zheng, W.; Nagaraju, G.; Liu, Z.; Liu, K. Functional roles of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3Ks) signaling in the mammalian ovary. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2012, 356, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Adhikari, D.; Liu, K. Molecular mechanisms underlying the activation of mammalian primordial follicles. Endocr. Rev. 2009, 30, 438–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Reddy, P.; Zheng, W.; Liu, K. Mechanisms maintaining the dormancy and survival of mammalian primordial follicles. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 21, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ford, E.; Beckett, E.L.; Roman, S.; McLaughlin, E.A.; Sutherland, J. Advances in human primordial follicle activation and premature ovarian insufficiency. Reproduction 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tilly, J.L. Commuting the death sentence: How oocytes strive to survive. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2, 838–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Broekmans, F.J.; Knauff, E.A.; te Velde, E.R.; Macklon, N.S.; Fauser, B.C. Female reproductive ageing: Current knowledge and future trends. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 18, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Faddy, M.J.; Gosden, R.G. A model conforming the decline in follicle numbers to the age of menopause in women. Hum. Reprod. 1996, 11, 1484–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Faddy, M.J.; Gosden, R.G.; Gougeon, A.; Richardson, S.J.; Nelson, J.F. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: Implications for forecasting menopause. Hum. Reprod 1992, 7, 1342–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Anderson, L.D.; Hirshfield, A.N. An overview of follicular development in the ovary: From embryo to the fertilized ovum in vitro. Md Med. J. 1992, 41, 614–620. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang, Z.P.; Mu, X.Y.; Guo, M.; Wang, Y.J.; Teng, Z.; Mao, G.P.; Niu, W.B.; Feng, L.Z.; Zhao, L.H.; Xia, G.L. Transforming growth factor-beta signaling participates in the maintenance of the primordial follicle pool in the mouse ovary. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 8299–8311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zheng, W.; Zhang, H.; Gorre, N.; Risal, S.; Shen, Y.; Liu, K. Two classes of ovarian primordial follicles exhibit distinct developmental dynamics and physiological functions. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 920–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zheng, W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, K. The two classes of primordial follicles in the mouse ovary: Their development, physiological functions and implications for future research. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 20, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Skinner, M.K. Regulation of primordial follicle assembly and development. Hum. Reprod. Update 2005, 11, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Reddy, P.; Liu, L.; Adhikari, D.; Jagarlamudi, K.; Rajareddy, S.; Shen, Y.; Du, C.; Tang, W.; Hamalainen, T.; Peng, S.L.; et al. Oocyte-specific deletion of Pten causes premature activation of the primordial follicle pool. Science 2008, 319, 611–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, S.-Y.; Kurita, T. New Insights into the Role of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Activity in the Physiology of Immature Oocytes: Lessons from Recent Mouse Model Studies. Eur. Med. J. Reprod. Health 2018, 3, 119–125. [Google Scholar]
  26. John, G.B.; Gallardo, T.D.; Shirley, L.J.; Castrillon, D.H. Foxo3 is a PI3K-dependent molecular switch controlling the initiation of oocyte growth. Dev. Biol. 2008, 321, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, H.; Risal, S.; Gorre, N.; Busayavalasa, K.; Li, X.; Shen, Y.; Bosbach, B.; Brannstrom, M.; Liu, K. Somatic cells initiate primordial follicle activation and govern the development of dormant oocytes in mice. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, 2501–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liu, P.; Cheng, H.; Roberts, T.M.; Zhao, J.J. Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 627–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cully, M.; You, H.; Levine, A.J.; Mak, T.W. Beyond PTEN mutations: The PI3K pathway as an integrator of multiple inputs during tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Engelman, J.A.; Luo, J.; Cantley, L.C. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 606–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Katso, R.; Okkenhaug, K.; Ahmadi, K.; White, S.; Timms, J.; Waterfield, M.D. Cellular function of phosphoinositide 3-kinases: Implications for development, homeostasis, and cancer. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2001, 17, 615–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lee, J.Y.; Engelman, J.A.; Cantley, L.C. Biochemistry. PI3K charges ahead. Science 2007, 317, 206–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mora, A.; Komander, D.; van Aalten, D.M.; Alessi, D.R. PDK1, the master regulator of AGC kinase signal transduction. Semin Cell Dev. Biol. 2004, 15, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Manning, B.D.; Cantley, L.C. AKT/PKB signaling: Navigating downstream. Cell 2007, 129, 1261–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Viglietto, G.; Motti, M.L.; Bruni, P.; Melillo, R.M.; D’Alessio, A.; Califano, D.; Vinci, F.; Chiappetta, G.; Tsichlis, P.; Bellacosa, A.; et al. Cytoplasmic relocalization and inhibition of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27(Kip1) by PKB/Akt-mediated phosphorylation in breast cancer. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 1136–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liang, J.; Zubovitz, J.; Petrocelli, T.; Kotchetkov, R.; Connor, M.K.; Han, K.; Lee, J.H.; Ciarallo, S.; Catzavelos, C.; Beniston, R.; et al. PKB/Akt phosphorylates p27, impairs nuclear import of p27 and opposes p27-mediated G1 arrest. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shin, I.; Yakes, F.M.; Rojo, F.; Shin, N.Y.; Bakin, A.V.; Baselga, J.; Arteaga, C.L. PKB/Akt mediates cell-cycle progression by phosphorylation of p27(Kip1) at threonine 157 and modulation of its cellular localization. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 1145–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cantley, L.C. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway. Science 2002, 296, 1655–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Meng, Q.; Xia, C.; Fang, J.; Rojanasakul, Y.; Jiang, B.H. Role of PI3K and AKT specific isoforms in ovarian cancer cell migration, invasion and proliferation through the p70S6K1 pathway. Cell Signal. 2006, 18, 2262–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Robertson, G.P. Functional and therapeutic significance of Akt deregulation in malignant melanoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2005, 24, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Salmena, L.; Carracedo, A.; Pandolfi, P.P. Tenets of PTEN tumor suppression. Cell 2008, 133, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bader, A.G.; Kang, S.; Zhao, L.; Vogt, P.K. Oncogenic PI3K deregulates transcription and translation. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5, 921–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Maidarti, M.; Clarkson, Y.L.; McLaughlin, M.; Anderson, R.A.; Telfer, E.E. Inhibition of PTEN activates bovine non-growing follicles in vitro but increases DNA damage and reduces DNA repair response. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Raffel, N.; Klemm, K.; Dittrich, R.; Hoffmann, I.; Soder, S.; Beckmann, M.W.; Lotz, L. The effect of bpV(HOpic) on in vitro activation of primordial follicles in cultured swine ovarian cortical strips. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2019, 54, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Adib, S.; Valojerdi, M.R.; Alikhani, M. Dose optimisation of PTEN inhibitor, bpV (HOpic), and SCF for the in-vitro activation of sheep primordial follicles. Growth Factors 2019, 37, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. McLaughlin, M.; Kinnell, H.L.; Anderson, R.A.; Telfer, E.E. Inhibition of phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) in human ovary in vitro results in increased activation of primordial follicles but compromises development of growing follicles. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 20, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Novella-Maestre, E.; Herraiz, S.; Rodriguez-Iglesias, B.; Diaz-Garcia, C.; Pellicer, A. Short-Term PTEN Inhibition Improves In Vitro Activation of Primordial Follicles, Preserves Follicular Viability, and Restores AMH Levels in Cryopreserved Ovarian Tissue From Cancer Patients. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tran, H.; Brunet, A.; Griffith, E.C.; Greenberg, M.E. The many forks in FOXO’s road. Sci. STKE 2003, 2003, RE5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hosaka, T.; Biggs, W.H., 3rd; Tieu, D.; Boyer, A.D.; Varki, N.M.; Cavenee, W.K.; Arden, K.C. Disruption of forkhead transcription factor (FOXO) family members in mice reveals their functional diversification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 2975–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Castrillon, D.H.; Miao, L.; Kollipara, R.; Horner, J.W.; DePinho, R.A. Suppression of ovarian follicle activation in mice by the transcription factor Foxo3a. Science 2003, 301, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Laplante, M.; Sabatini, D.M. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell 2012, 149, 274–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fingar, D.C.; Blenis, J. Target of rapamycin (TOR): An integrator of nutrient and growth factor signals and coordinator of cell growth and cell cycle progression. Oncogene 2004, 23, 3151–3171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Adhikari, D.; Risal, S.; Liu, K.; Shen, Y. Pharmacological inhibition of mTORC1 prevents over-activation of the primordial follicle pool in response to elevated PI3K signaling. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Crino, P.B.; Nathanson, K.L.; Henske, E.P. The tuberous sclerosis complex. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 1345–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. de Vries, P.J.; Prather, P.A. The tuberous sclerosis complex. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Adhikari, D.; Zheng, W.; Shen, Y.; Gorre, N.; Hamalainen, T.; Cooney, A.J.; Huhtaniemi, I.; Lan, Z.J.; Liu, K. Tsc/mTORC1 signaling in oocytes governs the quiescence and activation of primordial follicles. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Adhikari, D.; Flohr, G.; Gorre, N.; Shen, Y.; Yang, H.; Lundin, E.; Lan, Z.; Gambello, M.J.; Liu, K. Disruption of Tsc2 in oocytes leads to overactivation of the entire pool of primordial follicles. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2009, 15, 765–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, H.; Liu, K. Cellular and molecular regulation of the activation of mammalian primordial follicles: Somatic cells initiate follicle activation in adulthood. Hum. Reprod. Update 2015, 21, 779–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gorre, N.; Adhikari, D.; Lindkvist, R.; Brannstrom, M.; Liu, K.; Shen, Y. mTORC1 Signaling in oocytes is dispensable for the survival of primordial follicles and for female fertility. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lintern-Moore, S.; Moore, G.P. The initiation of follicle and oocyte growth in the mouse ovary. Biol. Reprod. 1979, 20, 773–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Hirshfield, A.N. Development of follicles in the mammalian ovary. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1991, 124, 43–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gougeon, A.; Chainy, G.B. Morphometric studies of small follicles in ovaries of women at different ages. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1987, 81, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cordeiro, C.N.; Christianson, M.S.; Selter, J.H.; Segars, J.H., Jr. In Vitro Activation: A Possible New Frontier for Treatment of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. Reprod. Sci. 2016, 23, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hergovich, A. Mammalian Hippo signalling: A kinase network regulated by protein-protein interactions. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2012, 40, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pan, D. Hippo signaling in organ size control. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 886–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kawamura, K.; Cheng, Y.; Suzuki, N.; Deguchi, M.; Sato, Y.; Takae, S.; Ho, C.H.; Kawamura, N.; Tamura, M.; Hashimoto, S.; et al. Hippo signaling disruption and Akt stimulation of ovarian follicles for infertility treatment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 17474–17479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Hsueh, A.J.W.; Kawamura, K. Hippo signaling disruption and ovarian follicle activation in infertile patients. Fertil. Steril. 2020, 114, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cargnello, M.; Roux, P.P. Activation and function of the MAPKs and their substrates, the MAPK-activated protein kinases. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2011, 75, 50–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Boutros, T.; Chevet, E.; Metrakos, P. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase/MAP kinase phosphatase regulation: Roles in cell growth, death, and cancer. Pharm. Rev. 2008, 60, 261–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, Y.; Shepherd, E.G.; Nelin, L.D. MAPK phosphatases--regulating the immune response. Nat. Rev. Immunol 2007, 7, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Fan, H.Y.; Liu, Z.; Shimada, M.; Sterneck, E.; Johnson, P.F.; Hedrick, S.M.; Richards, J.S. MAPK3/1 (ERK1/2) in ovarian granulosa cells are essential for female fertility. Science 2009, 324, 938–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Du, X.Y.; Huang, J.; Xu, L.Q.; Tang, D.F.; Wu, L.; Zhang, L.X.; Pan, X.L.; Chen, W.Y.; Zheng, L.P.; Zheng, Y.H. The proto-oncogene c-src is involved in primordial follicle activation through the PI3K, PKC and MAPK signaling pathways. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2012, 10, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Li-Ping, Z.; Da-Lei, Z.; Jian, H.; Liang-Quan, X.; Ai-Xia, X.; Xiao-Yu, D.; Dan-Feng, T.; Yue-Hui, Z. Proto-oncogene c-erbB2 initiates rat primordial follicle growth via PKC and MAPK pathways. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2010, 8, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Zheng, N.; Xu, X.; Yang, J.; Xia, G.; Zhang, M. MAPK3/1 participates in the activation of primordial follicles through mTORC1-KITL signaling. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Proszkowiec-Weglarz, M.; Richards, M.P. Expression and activity of the 5’-adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase pathway in selected tissues during chicken embryonic development. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 159–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mo, J.S.; Meng, Z.; Kim, Y.C.; Park, H.W.; Hansen, C.G.; Kim, S.; Lim, D.S.; Guan, K.L. Cellular energy stress induces AMPK-mediated regulation of YAP and the Hippo pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 500–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lu, X.; Guo, S.; Cheng, Y.; Kim, J.H.; Feng, Y.; Feng, Y. Stimulation of ovarian follicle growth after AMPK inhibition. Reproduction 2017, 153, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Jaffe, A.B.; Hall, A. Rho GTPases: Biochemistry and biology. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2005, 21, 247–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Yan, H.; Zhang, J.; Wen, J.; Wang, Y.; Niu, W.; Teng, Z.; Zhao, T.; Dai, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; et al. CDC42 controls the activation of primordial follicles by regulating PI3K signaling in mouse oocytes. BMC Biol. 2018, 16, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, J.; Yan, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Xu, X.; Dai, Y.; Zhao, S.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, G.; et al. In vivo and in vitro activation of dormant primordial follicles by EGF treatment in mouse and human. Clin. Transl. Med. 2020, 10, e182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cate, R.L.; Mattaliano, R.J.; Hession, C.; Tizard, R.; Farber, N.M.; Cheung, A.; Ninfa, E.G.; Frey, A.Z.; Gash, D.J.; Chow, E.P.; et al. Isolation of the bovine and human genes for Mullerian inhibiting substance and expression of the human gene in animal cells. Cell 1986, 45, 685–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lee, M.M.; Donahoe, P.K. Mullerian inhibiting substance: A gonadal hormone with multiple functions. Endocr. Rev. 1993, 14, 152–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mishina, Y.; Whitworth, D.J.; Racine, C.; Behringer, R.R. High specificity of Mullerian-inhibiting substance signaling in vivo. Endocrinology 1999, 140, 2084–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Hirobe, S.; He, W.W.; Lee, M.M.; Donahoe, P.K. Mullerian inhibiting substance messenger ribonucleic acid expression in granulosa and Sertoli cells coincides with their mitotic activity. Endocrinology 1992, 131, 854–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Taketo, T.; Saeed, J.; Manganaro, T.; Takahashi, M.; Donahoe, P.K. Mullerian inhibiting substance production associated with loss of oocytes and testicular differentiation in the transplanted mouse XX gonadal primordium. Biol. Reprod. 1993, 49, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  86. Ueno, S.; Kuroda, T.; Maclaughlin, D.T.; Ragin, R.C.; Manganaro, T.F.; Donahoe, P.K. Mullerian inhibiting substance in the adult rat ovary during various stages of the estrous cycle. Endocrinology 1989, 125, 1060–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Durlinger, A.L.; Gruijters, M.J.; Kramer, P.; Karels, B.; Ingraham, H.A.; Nachtigal, M.W.; Uilenbroek, J.T.; Grootegoed, J.A.; Themmen, A.P. Anti-Mullerian hormone inhibits initiation of primordial follicle growth in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology 2002, 143, 1076–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lee, M.M.; Donahoe, P.K.; Hasegawa, T.; Silverman, B.; Crist, G.B.; Best, S.; Hasegawa, Y.; Noto, R.A.; Schoenfeld, D.; MacLaughlin, D.T. Mullerian inhibiting substance in humans: Normal levels from infancy to adulthood. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1996, 81, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  89. Rajpert-De Meyts, E.; Jorgensen, N.; Graem, N.; Muller, J.; Cate, R.L.; Skakkebaek, N.E. Expression of anti-Mullerian hormone during normal and pathological gonadal development: Association with differentiation of Sertoli and granulosa cells. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999, 84, 3836–3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nilsson, E.; Rogers, N.; Skinner, M.K. Actions of anti-Mullerian hormone on the ovarian transcriptome to inhibit primordial to primary follicle transition. Reproduction 2007, 134, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Behringer, R.R.; Finegold, M.J.; Cate, R.L. Mullerian-inhibiting substance function during mammalian sexual development. Cell 1994, 79, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Durlinger, A.L.; Kramer, P.; Karels, B.; de Jong, F.H.; Uilenbroek, J.T.; Grootegoed, J.A.; Themmen, A.P. Control of primordial follicle recruitment by anti-Mullerian hormone in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology 1999, 140, 5789–5796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Carlsson, I.B.; Scott, J.E.; Visser, J.A.; Ritvos, O.; Themmen, A.P.; Hovatta, O. Anti-Mullerian hormone inhibits initiation of growth of human primordial ovarian follicles in vitro. Hum. Reprod. 2006, 21, 2223–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Hansen, K.R.; Hodnett, G.M.; Knowlton, N.; Craig, L.B. Correlation of ovarian reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Anderson, R.A.; Nelson, S.M.; Wallace, W.H. Measuring anti-Mullerian hormone for the assessment of ovarian reserve: When and for whom is it indicated? Maturitas 2012, 71, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Baker, V.L.; Glassner, M.J.; Doody, K.; Schnell, V.L.; Gracia, C.; Shin, S.S.; Behera, M.A.; Le Saint, C.M.; Alper, M.M.; Pavone, M.E.; et al. Validation study of the Access AMH antimullerian hormone assay for the prediction of poor ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil. Steril. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Annunziata, M.; Granata, R.; Ghigo, E. The IGF system. Acta Diabetol. 2011, 48, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kwintkiewicz, J.; Giudice, L.C. The interplay of insulin-like growth factors, gonadotropins, and endocrine disruptors in ovarian follicular development and function. Semin Reprod. Med. 2009, 27, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Zhou, P.; Baumgarten, S.C.; Wu, Y.G.; Bennett, J.; Winston, N.; Hirshfeld-Cytron, J.; Stocco, C. IGF-I Signaling Is Essential for FSH Stimulation of AKT and Steroidogenic Genes in Granulosa Cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 2013, 27, 511–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ryan, K.E.; Glister, C.; Lonergan, P.; Martin, F.; Knight, P.G.; Evans, A.C. Functional significance of the signal transduction pathways Akt and Erk in ovarian follicles: In vitro and in vivo studies in cattle and sheep. J. Ovarian Res. 2008, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bezerra, M.E.S.; Barberino, R.S.; Menezes, V.G.; Gouveia, B.B.; Macedo, T.J.S.; Santos, J.M.S.; Monte, A.P.O.; Barros, V.R.P.; Matos, M.H.T. Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) promotes primordial follicle growth and reduces DNA fragmentation through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) signalling pathway. Reprod. Fert. Dev. 2018, 30, 1503–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Danielpour, D.; Song, K. Cross-talk between IGF-I and TGF-beta signaling pathways. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2006, 17, 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Godkin, J. Transforming growth factor beta and the endometrium. Rev. Reprod 1998, 3, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Shull, M.M.; Doetschman, T. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 in reproduction and development. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1994, 39, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hezel, A.F.; Bardeesy, N. LKB1; linking cell structure and tumor suppression. Oncogene 2008, 27, 6908–6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Shackelford, D.B.; Shaw, R.J. The LKB1-AMPK pathway: Metabolism and growth control in tumour suppression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Hemminki, A.; Markie, D.; Tomlinson, I.; Avizienyte, E.; Roth, S.; Loukola, A.; Bignell, G.; Warren, W.; Aminoff, M.; Hoglund, P.; et al. A serine/threonine kinase gene defective in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Nature 1998, 391, 184–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Jiang, Z.Z.; Hu, M.W.; Ma, X.S.; Schatten, H.; Sun, Q.Y. LKB1 acts as a critical gatekeeper of ovarian primordial follicle pool. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 5738–5753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sherr, C.J.; Roberts, J.M. Inhibitors of mammalian G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Genes Dev. 1995, 9, 1149–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Polyak, K.; Kato, J.Y.; Solomon, M.J.; Sherr, C.J.; Massague, J.; Roberts, J.M.; Koff, A. p27Kip1, a cyclin-Cdk inhibitor, links transforming growth factor-beta and contact inhibition to cell cycle arrest. Genes Dev. 1994, 8, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Kaldis, P. Another Piece of the p27Kip1 Puzzle. Cell 2007, 128, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  112. Fero, M.L.; Randel, E.; Gurley, K.E.; Roberts, J.M.; Kemp, C.J. The murine gene p27Kip1 is haplo-insufficient for tumour suppression. Nature 1998, 396, 177–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Rajareddy, S.; Reddy, P.; Du, C.; Liu, L.; Jagarlamudi, K.; Tang, W.; Shen, Y.; Berthet, C.; Peng, S.L.; Kaldis, P.; et al. p27kip1 (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B) controls ovarian development by suppressing follicle endowment and activation and promoting follicle atresia in mice. Mol. Endocrinol. 2007, 21, 2189–2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Roth, L.; Koncina, E.; Satkauskas, S.; Cremel, G.; Aunis, D.; Bagnard, D. The many faces of semaphorins: From development to pathology. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2009, 66, 649–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Giacobini, P.; Prevot, V. Semaphorins in the development, homeostasis and disease of hormone systems. Semin Cell Dev. Biol. 2013, 24, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Uesaka, N.; Uchigashima, M.; Mikuni, T.; Nakazawa, T.; Nakao, H.; Hirai, H.; Aiba, A.; Watanabe, M.; Kano, M. Retrograde semaphorin signaling regulates synapse elimination in the developing mouse brain. Science 2014, 344, 1020–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Svensson, A.; Libelius, R.; Tagerud, S. Semaphorin 6C expression in innervated and denervated skeletal muscle. J. Mol. Histol. 2008, 39, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Burgaya, F.; Fontana, X.; Martinez, A.; Montolio, M.; Mingorance, A.; Simo, S.; del Rio, J.A.; Soriano, E. Semaphorin 6C leads to GSK-3-dependent growth cone collapse and redistributes after entorhino-hippocampal axotomy. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 2006, 33, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhou, S.; Yan, W.; Shen, W.; Cheng, J.; Xi, Y.; Yuan, S.; Fu, F.; Ding, T.; Luo, A.; Wang, S. Low expression of SEMA6C accelerates the primordial follicle activation in the neonatal mouse ovary. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 486–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Vachharajani, V.T.; Liu, T.; Wang, X.; Hoth, J.J.; Yoza, B.K.; McCall, C.E. Sirtuins Link Inflammation and Metabolism. J. Immunol Res. 2016, 2016, 8167273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Grabowska, W.; Sikora, E.; Bielak-Zmijewska, A. Sirtuins, a promising target in slowing down the ageing process. Biogerontology 2017, 18, 447–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Revollo, J.R.; Li, X. The ways and means that fine tune Sirt1 activity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2013, 38, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Cinco, R.; Digman, M.A.; Gratton, E.; Luderer, U. Spatial Characterization of Bioenergetics and Metabolism of Primordial to Preovulatory Follicles in Whole Ex Vivo Murine Ovary. Biol. Reprod. 2016, 95, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Nemoto, S. Nutrient Availability Regulates SIRT1 Through a Forkhead-Dependent Pathway. Science 2004, 306, 2105–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ding, D.C.; Chang, Y.H.; Shyu, W.C.; Lin, S.Z. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: A new era for stem cell therapy. Cell Transpl. 2015, 24, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Hu, Y.; Rao, S.S.; Wang, Z.X.; Cao, J.; Tan, Y.J.; Luo, J.; Li, H.M.; Zhang, W.S.; Chen, C.Y.; Xie, H. Exosomes from human umbilical cord blood accelerate cutaneous wound healing through miR-21-3p-mediated promotion of angiogenesis and fibroblast function. Theranostics 2018, 8, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Shao, L.B.; Zhang, Y.; Lan, B.B.; Wang, J.J.; Zhang, Z.W.; Zhang, L.L.; Xiao, P.L.; Meng, Q.Y.; Geng, Y.J.; Yu, X.Y.; et al. MiRNA-Sequence Indicates That Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Exosomes Have Similar Mechanism to Enhance Cardiac Repair. Biomed. Res. Int 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Xin, H.; Katakowski, M.; Wang, F.; Qian, J.Y.; Liu, X.S.; Ali, M.M.; Buller, B.; Zhang, Z.G.; Chopp, M. MicroRNA cluster miR-17-92 Cluster in Exosomes Enhance Neuroplasticity and Functional Recovery After Stroke in Rats. Stroke 2017, 48, 747–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wang, B.; Yao, K.; Huuskes, B.M.; Shen, H.H.; Zhuang, J.; Godson, C.; Brennan, E.P.; Wilkinson-Berka, J.L.; Wise, A.F.; Ricardo, S.D. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Deliver Exogenous MicroRNA-let7c via Exosomes to Attenuate Renal Fibrosis. Mol. Ther. 2016, 24, 1290–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sheikhansari, G.; Aghebati-Maleki, L.; Nouri, M.; Jadidi-Niaragh, F.; Yousefi, M. Current approaches for the treatment of premature ovarian failure with stem cell therapy. Biomed. Pharm. 2018, 102, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Li, J.; Mao, Q.; He, J.; She, H.; Zhang, Z.; Yin, C. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells improve the reserve function of perimenopausal ovary via a paracrine mechanism. Stem Cell Res. 2017, 8, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ding, C.Y.; Zou, Q.Y.; Wang, F.X.; Wu, H.H.; Chen, R.L.; Lv, J.H.; Ling, M.F.; Sun, J.; Wang, W.; Li, H.; et al. Human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells improve ovarian function in natural aging through secreting hepatocyte growth factor and epidermal growth factor. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Ding, L.; Yan, G.; Wang, B.; Xu, L.; Gu, Y.; Ru, T.; Cui, X.; Lei, L.; Liu, J.; Sheng, X.; et al. Transplantation of UC-MSCs on collagen scaffold activates follicles in dormant ovaries of POF patients with long history of infertility. Sci. China Life Sci. 2018, 61, 1554–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Yang, W.; Zhang, J.; Xu, B.; He, Y.; Liu, W.; Li, J.; Zhang, S.; Lin, X.; Su, D.; Wu, T.; et al. HucMSC-Derived Exosomes Mitigate the Age-Related Retardation of Fertility in Female Mice. Mol. Ther. 2020, 28, 1200–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Vo, K.C.T.; Kawamura, K. In Vitro Activation Early Follicles: From the Basic Science to the Clinical Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Kawamura, K.; Kawamura, N.; Hsueh, A.J. Activation of dormant follicles: A new treatment for premature ovarian failure? Curr. Opin. Obs. Gynecol 2016, 28, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Suzuki, N.; Yoshioka, N.; Takae, S.; Sugishita, Y.; Tamura, M.; Hashimoto, S.; Morimoto, Y.; Kawamura, K. Successful fertility preservation following ovarian tissue vitrification in patients with primary ovarian insufficiency. Hum. Reprod. 2015, 30, 608–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zhai, J.; Yao, G.; Dong, F.; Bu, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Sato, Y.; Hu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Dai, S.; et al. In Vitro Activation of Follicles and Fresh Tissue Auto-transplantation in Primary Ovarian Insufficiency Patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 4405–4412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Fabregues, F.; Ferreri, J.; Calafell, J.M.; Moreno, V.; Borras, A.; Manau, D.; Carmona, F. Pregnancy after drug-free in vitro activation of follicles and fresh tissue autotransplantation in primary ovarian insufficiency patient: A case report and literature review. J. Ovarian Res. 2018, 11, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Mahajan, N.; Kaur, J.; Bhattacharya, B.; Naidu, P.; Gupta, S. In vitro activation of ovary. Onco. Fertil. J. 2019, 2, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lunding, S.A.; Pors, S.E.; Kristensen, S.G.; Landersoe, S.K.; Jeppesen, J.V.; Flachs, E.M.; Pinborg, A.; Macklon, K.T.; Pedersen, A.T.; Andersen, C.Y.; et al. Biopsying, fragmentation and autotransplantation of fresh ovarian cortical tissue in infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve. Hum. Reprod 2019, 34, 1924–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Kawamura, K.; Ishizuka, B.; Hsueh, A.J.W. Drug-free in-vitro activation of follicles for infertility treatment in poor ovarian response patients with decreased ovarian reserve. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2020, 40, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Ferreri, J.; Fabregues, F.; Calafell, J.M.; Solernou, R.; Borras, A.; Saco, A.; Manau, D.; Carmona, F. Drug-free in-vitro activation of follicles and fresh tissue autotransplantation as a therapeutic option in patients with primary ovarian insufficiency. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2020, 40, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Sun, X.; Su, Y.; He, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, W.; Zhang, H.; Hou, Z.; Liu, J.; Li, J. New strategy for in vitro activation of primordial follicles with mTOR and PI3K stimulators. Cell Cycle 2015, 14, 721–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Maidarti, M.; Anderson, R.A.; Telfer, E.E. Crosstalk between PTEN/PI3K/Akt signalling and DNA damage in the oocyte: Implications for primordial follicle activation, oocyte quality and ageing. Cells 2020, 9, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.