Effects of Environmental Stresses (Heat, Salt, Waterlogging) on Grain Yield and Associated Traits of Wheat under Application of Sulfur-Coated Urea

: Abiotic stresses, such as heat, salt, waterlogging, and multiple-stress environments have signiﬁcantly reduced wheat production in recent decades. There is a need to use effective strategies for overcoming crop losses due to these abiotic stresses. Fertilizer-based approaches are readily available and can be managed in all farming communities. This research revealed the effects of sulfur-coated urea (SCU, 130 kg ha − 1 , release time of 120 days) on wheat crops under heat, salt, waterlogging, and combined-stress climatic conditions. The research was done using a completely randomized design with three replicates. The results revealed that SCU at a rate of 130 kg of N ha − 1 showed a signiﬁcantly ( p ≤ 0.05) high SPAD value (55) in the case of waterlogging stress, while it was the lowest (31) in the case of heat stress; the control had a SPAD value of 58. Stress application signiﬁcantly ( p ≤ 0.05) reduced the leaf area and was the highest in control (1898 cm 2 ), followed by salt stress (1509 cm 2 ), waterlogging (1478 cm 2 ), and heat stress (1298 cm 2 ). A signiﬁcantly ( p ≤ 0.05) lowest crop yield was observed in the case of heat stress (3623.47 kg ha − 1 ) among all stresses, while it was 10,270 kg ha − 1 in control and was reduced up to 35% after the application of heat stress. Among all stresses, the salt stress showed the highest crop yield of 5473.16 kg ha − 1 . A signiﬁcant correlation was observed among growth rate, spike length, yield, and physiological constraints with N content in the soil. The SCU fertilizer was the least effective against heat stress but could tolerate salt stress in wheat plants. The ﬁndings suggested the feasibility of adding SCU as an alternative to normal urea to alleviate salt stresses and improve wheat crop growth and yield traits. For heat stress tolerance, the applicability of SCU with a longer release period of ~180 days is recommended as a future prospect for study.

One of the good slow-release nitrogen fertilizers is sulfur-coated urea (SCU), which promotes wheat growth and development. The wheat crop has a positive correlation between "S" and "N" elements [23]. The S element is a secondary and fungicide with acidic possessions that neutralize the alkalinity of soil [24]. As a result, the excessive application of N without the S coating material results in the extreme leaching of N [21]. As a result, the prudent application of nitrogen fertilizers and nitrogen sources reduces strength while increasing crop yield under stress.
Few studies have narrated the effects of SCU on wheat under comparative examination of heat, salt stress, waterlogging and combined stress conditions. A study addressing the comparative effect of slow-release nitrogen fertilizer on three stresses (salt, waterlogging, and heat) has not been conducted before, hence the novelty of our study. There is a need to conduct a detailed study based on various abiotic conditions under controlled nitrogen fertilization. To address all the issues mentioned above, the current study aimed to determine the effects of salt stress, waterlogging, and heat stresses on the physiological attributes and wheat crop yield. Furthermore, the current study also focused on improving wheat growth and development, as well as viable soil management using SCU (with a nitrogen release period of 120 days) under heat, salt stress, waterlogging, and combined stresses. Another objective of the current study was to assess the effect of the N source and release rate on wheat production and abiotic stress tolerance. The effectiveness of slowrelease SCU against various abiotic stresses was determined along with control wheat with the same SCU fertilizer. This study also aimed to determine the key physical parameters affecting crop yield once the stresses were applied.

Experimental Site and Environmental Conditions:
Pot experiments were carried out during the wheat growing season in 2020-2021 (2021) at the Agricultural Experiment Station (32 • 39 N, 119 • 42 E) of Agricultural College, Yangzhou University, in China. Winter wheat (Yangmai 25) was grown in the pot field. Each experiment consisted of five developmental phases (overwintering, jointing, booting, flowering, and maturity), with 6 seeds of Yangmai 25 genotype grown in individual pots ( Figure S2). Four stresses were chosen: waterlogging, salt stress, heat, and the combined effect of these three stresses, which were monitored at different growth stages ( Figure S3). Due to the abundant rainfall in this area, we did not need to irrigate during the wheat growing season. However, if necessary, the pots were irrigated with tap water accordingly to retain the field capacity required for healthy wheat growth.
The experiment was a completely randomized design with SCU treatment (control-SCU only) as the main plot and stress as the subplot. There were four stress treatments (waterlogging, salt stress, heat, and combined). There were five plots in the experiment ( Figure S2). Each treatment was conducted in triplicate and was subjected to the same field management. The N rate adopted in the experiment was 130 kg ha −1 , consistent with the optimum N rate in all the treatments, including control (CK). Phosphate (114 kg ha −1 P 2 O 5 ) and potassium (62 kg ha −1 K 2 O) fertilizers were applied once before sowing conferring to the pre-soil analysis report. Basal fertilizer was applied at a depth of 10-15 cm [22]. A total of six seeds of Yangmai 25 were sown in a 10 kg pot filled with a standard potting mixture [25] (Table S2).
The slow-release sulfur-coated urea (SCU; release time 120 days) was used as a stressalleviation substance at a recommended dose of 130 kg ha −1 in all treatments, including the control. Seeds were sown on 8 November 2020, while sampling was performed at the overwintering stage (28 December 2020), jointing stage (12 March 2021), booting stage (30 Mar 2021), flowering stage (17 April 2021), and maturity stage (28 May 2021). The setups for the different abiotic stress applications were established as follows.
For the heat stress, plants were upraised with control plants until the flowering stage and then moved to the heat stress chamber (cryogenic room) for the remainder of the growth period (up to maturity). The plants were kept under a 16 h photoperiod duration and provided a light intensity of 350 µmol m −2 s −1 generated by metal halide lamps. The temperature treatment was as follows: the night temperature was kept at 20 • C, whereas the day temperature was gradually increased to 33 • C and held for 8 h, then subsequently decreased to 20 • C. The relative humidity (%RH) was kept at 64-68% and 76% during the day and night, respectively, in the stress chamber ( Figures S1 and S3).
For waterlogging stress, plants were grown with control plants, and stress was applied from germination to the overwintering stage (35 days). Waterlogging was applied using water from a nearby water service by flooding the pots allocated for the waterlogging treatments. The soil was moisturized using water above field capacity using incessant flooding, generally every day, to produce an oxygen-deficient atmosphere. For this purpose, pots were placed in a water basin (i.e., used for nursery rice growing). There was a storage tank on one side and a drainage valve on the other side. The standing water level was maintained at~12 cm. Water was replaced after 4-7 days according to weather and water conditions. For replacing water, a drainage valve was opened according to the storage tank valve so that the water level could be maintained. The soil moisture content was measured by an oven-drying method using 1 g of soil sample at 105 • C overnight [26]. In control, the soil moisture content was <85%, while it was from 85 to 100% for the stressed plants ( Figures S1 and S3).
For salt stress, a 15 mM sodium chloride (NaCl) solution was used as a source, while plants were grown with control plants under the same conditions. The salt stress was applied after the jointing stage and continued until maturation (Figures S1 and S3).
For combined stress, plants were grown in waterlogged stress, and after the jointing stage, salt stress was applied. After the flowering stage, these plants were transferred to the heating chamber, and they continued to grow there until the maturation stage ( Figure S3). In total, the experimental setup consisted of 1 genotype × 3 pots × 4 abiotic stresses × 5 developmental stages × 1 fertilizer (SCU: for all treatments including control) × 6 seeds per pot.
A control treatment was also established in triplicate in a separate plot containing the same SCU fertilizer but at a recommended dose of 130 kg ha −1 ( Figure S2). A separate pot experiment without any stress and fertilizer was also conducted under the same conditions to compare the nitrogen accumulation. Seeds were sown on 8 November 2020, and the wheat crop was harvested on 28 May 2021. During this study period, samples were collected at 5 stages: (1) overwintering stage: 28 December 2020; (2)

Procedure/Protocols for Growth and Yield Parameters
Each experimental unit was measured for yield and yield-related characteristics, such as plant height, seeds per spike, total dry matter (kg ha −1 ), number of tillers per plant, grain yield (kg ha −1 ), average seeds weight per spike, and harvest index. Portable chlorophyll meters (SPAD-502, Konica Minolta, Osaka, Japan) and mobile photosynthesis systems (LI-6400, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE 68504, USA) were used to collect data on physiological parameters, including chlorophyll content percent and net photosynthetic rate [26,27]. Wheat plants were harvested at various stages of development to measure fresh and dry biomass. An electrical weight balance was used to measure the fresh weight of leaves and stems. Then, oven drying of leaves and stems was done for 48 h (up to constant weight) at 70 • C, and the dry weight was calculated [24]. A leaf area meter (Model, CI-202, CID Bio-Science, Inc., 1554 NE 3rd Avenue, Camas, WA 98607, USA) was used to calculate the leaf area. At maturity, plants from three pots were collected from each experimental component, and various yield components were quantified. The final yield and biomass of the entire experimental unit were assessed separately, and on the rationale of dry biomass production, transformed into kg ha −1 . The activity of photosynthetic properties, fluorescence, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, the intercellular CO 2 concentration of the plants, transpiration rate, and water use efficiency were all measured Agronomy 2021, 11, 2340 5 of 19 with a portable system (LI-6400, Li-Cor Inc., USA). Water use efficiency was also calculated (photosynthetic rate divided by transpiration rate) following the methodology of a previous study [24]. All analyses were performed in triplicate, and mean values were calculated.

Estimation of Plant NPK
The plant N content was measured at 20, 60, and 120 days using the standard procedure described by Watson et al. [24]. A digestion tube was filled with the plant-dried sample (1.0 g). Then, in a digestion block, 15 mL of concentrated H 2 SO 4 and 1 g digestion mixture (K 2 SO 4 + CuSO 4 @ 9:1) were combined, and the tubes were heated for 2 h at 450 • C. After heating, the color of the solution was changed from transparent to yellowishgreen, visible in the digestion tubes. A distillate unit produced the required volume for the distillation process. Then, the material was placed in a receiver containing 4% boric acid (25 mL). After that, a few drops of the indicator were added; the purple color then changed to golden yellow through the distillation process. The subsequent distillates were then titrated with 0.1 N H 2 SO 4 , resulting in purple as an endpoint from a golden yellow shade [24].
The following spectrophotometer and the spectrophotometric vanadium phosphomolybdate processes were used to estimate the P percent in the plant following the standard protocol of a previous study [28]. The spectrophotometer was used to run the standard of P samples. Following this, the P concentration of plant samples was assessed using the yellow color procedure. The digested plant samples were used to distill water, and a coloring reagent was placed in a flask. The flask was then placed at room temperature for about 30-35 min, with the development of color over the subsequent time. The P percent in plant samples was then calculated using just a spectrophotometer at 420 nm using the standard method [29]. The flame photometer procedure was used to measure the K concentration using a method developed by a previous study [30].

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) [31]. All results are presented as the means of three replicates. Data from each sampling stage were analyzed separately and were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by means comparison using Duncan's multiple range test (DMRT) using a statistically significant level of p < 0.05. In the correlation analysis, the nonparametric Spearman test was used for the correlation of different traits.

Results
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), a staple cereal crop in various world regions, is a major cereal crop subjected to many biotic and abiotic stresses such as heat, salt, waterlogging, and sometimes, a combination of stresses. These stresses have a global impact on crop yields. Farmers have used various mechanisms to combat a vast array of biotic and abiotic stresses. One of these aspects is fertilizers that affect the nutrient availability to the plant. The experiment was conducted on winter wheat crop Yangmai 25 genotype for a fivestage (germination to maturity) growth period amended with SCU having a release time of 120 days. The sample and experimental analysis were conducted at every stage. The effect of SCU or stress alleviation effect of SCU was analyzed in terms of growth and physiological parameters. The study showed exciting aspects of each type of stress that are presented below. change of~5% was observed in the florescence value, and the photosynthetic rate was decreased by 7%, compared to the control. This was also related to the number of tillers and leaf area of the plants (Figures 2 and 3), which were also significantly (p < 0.05) lower than the control. At the flowering stage, the plant had four tillers in the case of stress, while the control had five; the leaf area of the control plant was 1898 cm 2 , while it was 1330 cm 2 in stress conditions. The photosynthetic rate corresponded to the SPAD value, which showed a significant (p < 0.05) decrease at the flowering stage (Figure 4). At the flowering stage, it was~57 in the case of the control and~50 once waterlogging stress was applied, i.e., a decrease of 10% was observed. The SPAD value is a measure of the chlorophyll value. Both leaf area and photosynthetic rate were negatively affected by stress, consequently reducing total dry matter accumulation rates and final yields. The same trend of fresh and dry biomass was observed in our study, where stress application considerably (p ≤ 0.05) reduced the biomass content of the wheat plant ( Figures 5 and 6). This significant (p ≤ 0.05) decrease in the photosynthetic rate was also correlated with the stomatal conductance (Figure 7b), transpiration rate (Figure 7a), and water use efficiency ( Figure 7c). In April 2021, stressed wheat plants showed 9, 10, 8.8, and 9.6% lower stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, intercellular CO 2 , and water use efficiency, respectively, compared to the control plant. The waterlogging stress was applied up to the overwintering stage; initially, stress did not affect plant growth significantly (p ≤ 0.05). It was evident in the change of florescence value and photosynthetic rate (Figure 1a,b), which were 0.794 and 14.58 μmol CO2 m −2 s −1 , respectively, at the start of the experiment. At the flowering stage, a significant (p ≤ 0.05) change of ~5% was observed in the florescence value, and the photosynthetic rate was decreased by 7%, compared to the control. This was also related to the number of tillers and leaf area of the plants (Figures 2 and 3), which were also significantly (p < 0.05) lower than the control. At the flowering stage, the plant had four tillers in the case of stress, while the control had five; the leaf area of the control plant was 1898 cm 2 , while it was 1330 cm 2 in stress conditions. The photosynthetic rate corresponded to the SPAD value, which showed a significant (p < 0.05) decrease at the flowering stage (Figure 4). At the flowering stage, it was ~57 in the case of the control and ~50 once waterlogging stress was applied, i.e., a decrease of 10% was observed. The SPAD value is a measure of the chlorophyll value. Both leaf area and photosynthetic rate were negatively affected by stress, consequently reducing total dry matter accumulation rates and final yields. The same trend of fresh and dry biomass was observed in our study, where stress application considerably (p ≤ 0.05) reduced the biomass content of the wheat plant ( Figures 5 and 6). This significant (p ≤ 0.05) decrease in the photosynthetic rate was also correlated with the stomatal conductance (Figure 7b), transpiration rate (Figure 7a), and water use efficiency ( Figure 7c). In April 2021, stressed wheat plants showed 9, 10, 8.8, and 9.6% lower stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, intercellular CO2, and water use efficiency, respectively, compared to the control plant.  Table  S1). Lowercase letters show the significant differences among treatments according to one-way ANOVA and DMRT, while the significance level was p ≤ 0.05. CK: control; WL: waterlogging; SS: salt stress; HS: heat stress; CS: combined stress.
(c)  Table S1). Lowercase letters show the significant differences among treatments according to one-way ANOVA and DMRT, while the significance level was p ≤ 0.05. CK: control; WL: waterlogging; SS: salt stress; HS: heat stress; CS: combined stress.            Table S1). Lowercase letters show the significant differences among treatments according to one-way ANOVA and DMRT, while the significance level was p ≤ 0.05.

Salt Stress and Wheat Growth during the Study
The salt stress was applied after the jointing stage; initially, it was less disturbing for the plant, but the wheat growth was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced after the booting stage. It was evident in the change in fluorescence value and photosynthetic rate (Figure 1a,b), which were 0.794 and 14.58 μmol CO2 m −2 s −1 , respectively, at the start of the experiment in control. A significant decrease of 2 and 4% was observed in the case of florescence value and photosynthetic rate, respectively. It was also correlated with the number of tillers. Tillers and leaf area of the plant (Figures 2 and 3) were 6.8 and 3655 cm 2 at the booting stage, respectively, and both were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced at the flowering stage.   Table S1). Lowercase letters show the significant differences among treatments according to one-way ANOVA and DMRT, while the significance level was p ≤ 0.05.

Salt Stress and Wheat Growth during the Study
The salt stress was applied after the jointing stage; initially, it was less disturbing for the plant, but the wheat growth was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced after the booting stage. It was evident in the change in fluorescence value and photosynthetic rate (Figure 1a,b), which were 0.794 and 14.58 μmol CO2 m −2 s −1 , respectively, at the start of the experiment in control. A significant decrease of 2 and 4% was observed in the case of florescence value and photosynthetic rate, respectively. It was also correlated with the number of tillers. Tillers and leaf area of the plant (Figures 2 and 3) were 6.8 and 3655 cm 2 at the booting stage, respectively, and both were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced at the flowering stage.  Table S1). Lowercase letters show the significant differences among treatments according to one-way ANOVA and DMRT, while the significance level was p ≤ 0.05.

Salt Stress and Wheat Growth during the Study
The salt stress was applied after the jointing stage; initially, it was less disturbing for the plant, but the wheat growth was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced after the booting stage. It was evident in the change in fluorescence value and photosynthetic rate (Figure 1a,b), which were 0.794 and 14.58 µmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 , respectively, at the start of the experiment in control. A significant decrease of 2 and 4% was observed in the case of florescence value and photosynthetic rate, respectively. It was also correlated with the number of tillers. Tillers and leaf area of the plant (Figures 2 and 3) were 6.8 and 3655 cm 2 at the booting stage, respectively, and both were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced at the flowering stage. The plant had four tillers in case of stress while the control had 5; the leaf area at this stage was 1898 cm 2 , while it was 1590 cm 2 in salt stress conditions. The photosynthetic rate corresponded to the SPAD value, which showed a significant (p ≤ 0.05) decrease at the flowering stage ( Figure 4). It was~57 in the case of the control at the flowering stage, while it was reduced to~46 once salt stress was applied. SPAD value is the measure of chlorophyll value. Both leaf area and photosynthetic rate were decreased significantly (p ≤ 0.05) by stress, resulting in significant reductions in total dry matter accumulation rates and final yields. The same trend of fresh and dry biomass was observed in our study, in which the application of stress considerably (p ≤ 0.05) reduced the biomass content of the wheat plant ( Figures 5 and 6). This trend of photosynthetic rate was also correlated with the stomatal conductance (Figure 7b), transpiration rate (Figure 7a), and water use efficiency (Figure 7c). In April 2021, stressed wheat plants showed 8.9, 12, 9.8, and 8.9% lower stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, intercellular CO 2 , and water use efficiency, respectively than control plants.

Heat Stress and Wheat Growth during the Study
The heat stress was applied after the flowering stage; it was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) most disturbing to the plant, perhaps due to the unavailability of nitrogen, as release time for most of the nitrogen in the case of SCU, is 120 days. The trend of fresh and dry biomass explains this in our study, in which stress application considerably (p ≤ 0.05) reduced the biomass content of the wheat plant ( Figure 5). At the maturation phase, the biomass for control was~55 g, while it was reduced to 25 g after heat stress. For all growth parameters, control plants grew better than stressed ones. However, the stress affected the wheat plant comparatively less until after the first~110 days of the experiment (until the booting stage).
In contrast, afterward, growth was significantly affected (p ≤ 0.05). It can be explained in terms of the nitrogen release period of the SCU, which was~120 days. Combined stress had quite the same action as heat stress. Table 1 shows the effect of waterlogging stress on the yield of the wheat plant. The crop yield kg ha −1 was reduced significantly (p ≤ 0.05) to 6034.5, which was~40% less than the control group (10,270 kg ha −1 ). It was 60% of the growth without stress. It is explainable in terms of the 1000-grain weight, which was reduced significantly (p ≤ 0.05) from 56 g in control to 46 g once the stress was applied.

Effect of Salt Stress on Yield of the Wheat Plant
The effect of salt stress on the yield of the wheat plant is given in Table 1. The crop yield kg ha −1 was reduced significantly (p ≤ 0.05) to 5473.16 kg ha −1 . It was not significantly (p ≤ 0.05) less, but just half of the growth without stress, which was further correlated with the 1000-grain weight, which was reduced significantly (p ≤ 0.05) from 56 g in control to 48.50 g once the salt stress was applied.

Effect of Heat Stress on Yield of the Wheat Plant
In the case of heat stress, the crop yield was 3623.47 kg ha −1 , while in control, it was 10270 kg ha −1 (Table 1). In other words, the crop yield was reduced by 75% after heat stress application. This was further related to the 1000-grain weight, which was reduced significantly (p ≤ 0.05) from 56 g in control to 21.50 g once the stress was applied. The heat stress was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) more deadly for the plant than salt and waterlogging stress, as shown in Table 1. Table 1 shows the effect of combined stress on the yield of the wheat plant. The crop yield kg ha −1 was reduced significantly (p ≤ 0.05) from 10,270 in the control group to 2309.10 in the stressed one. The 1000-grain weight was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced from 56.75 g in control to 22.80 g in stress conditions. The correlation matrix (Table 2) shows the negative correlation between spike number and grain weight. The leaf area, photosynthesis, SPAD, tiller, and spike weight were positively correlated. The PCA matrix and plot (Table 3 and Figure 8) show the spike length, spike weight, and leaf area as the most prominent parameters affecting plant yield once the leaf area was reduced, which might have been due to the waterlogging stress. As a result, photosynthesis was reduced, and ultimately, spike weight was compromised. On the other hand, once spike weight was compromised, ultimately, grain weight was reduced, and finally, the plant yield was reduced.

NPK in the Plant and Stress Response
Fertilizer is an essential resource for plant growth. The results of NPK in wheat plants grown under different abiotic stresses and with SCU application are shown in Table 4. It was revealed that NPK was highest in control and lowest in the case of heat and combined stresses. At the heat stress application stage, the plant was already at the flowering stage, and %N was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced from 2.8 to 1.8%, P was reduced from 0.31 mg/kg to 0.24 mg/kg, and %K was reduced 1.2 to 0.98%. A 20% decrease in %K was observed in waterlogging stress, and it was the same in all treatments. Combined stressed accumulated the least nitrogen (1.33%) and P (0.98%) in plants among all treatments (Table 4).

Discussion
In the current experiment, the effect of different abiotic stresses was analyzed individually and in a combined form under the influence of SCU. It was found that the spike weight and root network were affected by all the stresses, but heat stress significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced crop yield (Table 1). Our results of crop yield reduction due to heat stress were following the previous studies conducted on wheat and soya bean [7][8][9]. It was also found that the nitrogen release period was key to the stress alleviation for the plant at a growth point of~120 days (that is, nitrogen release period of the fertilizer), as the plant was able to grow in all stressed environments. However, after this phase (at maturity and late flowering), plant growth was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced. Our studies observed correlations between growth parameters, such as spike number and grain weight leaf area, photosynthesis, SPAD, tiller, and spike weight ( Table 2). Studies in the past also revealed that different growth parameters were related to each other, and changes in one growth parameter could cause alterations in the other parameters of the wheat plant [32]. The PCA matrix and plot (Table 3 and Figure 8) show the spike length, spike weight, and leaf area as the most prominent parameters affecting crop yield. Many studies have suggested the dry weight of wheat seedlings as the best principle for measuring the stress resistance attribute of the genotype [33,34]. A further detailed discussion of these results is given below.
The stress (waterlogging, salt stress, and heat) tolerance in the wheat plants is a matter of growth tolerance in plants, which initiate vigorous root systems and proliferate abundantly [1,2,33]. Our experiments also showed fewer tillers and reduced photosynthetic rate, fluorescence, dry biomass, leaf area, SPAD value, and crop yield, especially for the heat and salt stresses. However, these effects were moderate in waterlogging stress, especially for the first 120 days (Table 1, Figures 2-4 and 6). Salt stress was already reported to adversely affect plants' growth by Yu et al. [10]. In another study, Domico et al. [11] also reported reduced metabolic activity in the cardoon plant when subjected to long-term and short-term salt stress. The work of Pezo et al. further supported our results [12], reporting the reduced crop yield and pepper seed quality under salt stress.
Similarly, our results of reduced photosynthetic rate, leaf area, dry biomass, and yield were consistent with previous research conducted on wheat [7] and soya bean [8].
Waterlogging is undoubtedly reported to negatively impact a plant's physiological and biochemical response [16][17][18]. However, few studies also reported the innate adaptability of a plant against waterlogging stress [35]. It might be attributed to the capability of a plant to grow in hypoxic conditions that are mainly based on the root system tolerance of a plant [18,35]. It was hypothesized that the Yangmai 25 was able to build a good root network. That is why it was less affected by waterlogging stress than other stresses. In the first phase of waterlogging stress, the root growth might have been rapid or close to that of the control plants in Yangmai 25, but after~120 days, the growth of the roots might have been compromised, which resulted in the decreased crop yield (Table 1). Once the root growth is clasped, the shoot growth can never recover to the control value for any genotypes [35]. Malik et al. [36] also suggested root growth recovery as a key to waterlogging stress tolerance. Similar results were also revealed by Ahmed et al. [37] while working on mung bean under waterlogging stress. Now let us find out why the plant tolerated the stress for the first 120 days. The answer lies in the nitrogen release time of the SCU used in the current study, which was 120 days. In the first phase, wheat could withstand all the stresses due to the soil's high accessibility of nutrients and water availability [33,34]. Our findings disclosed that crops reached maturity phases a bit early; this might be due to controlled release/coated fertilizer [20]. The experiment showed that the N released by SCU attained maximum nitrogen content in the control plants, followed by waterlogging, salt stress, combined, and then heat stress. Our results agreed with Praharaj et al. [38] and Joshi et al. [39], who worked on pulses and rice, respectively. These studies found that adequate irrigation and controlled nitrogen supplies could induce extra productivity in plants in abiotic stress conditions. The coated urea also helped the wheat plant attain better grain weight (1000-grain weight) than the control (Table 1), but fertilizer was the least effective in heat stress. Similar results of enhanced grain weight in the wheat plant were observed by Ghafoor et al. [22] while applying SCU to alleviate stress on the plant in an arid climate.
In our experiment, heat stress significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced plant growth among all stresses (Figures 2-6). This can be explained in terms of the heat sensitivity of the plant [8]. High-temperature stress is the leading environmental factor that limits wheat yield. Wheat yield decreases by 10% for every 1 • C increase above the mean temperature of 23 • C [6]. High-temperature stress affects more than 40% of the world's wheat area every year. It reduces wheat yield through chronic stress resulting from prolonged, relatively high temperatures up to 32 • C, or through heat-shock caused by abruptly but comparatively brief exposure to 33 • C and above. High temperatures cause changes in the physiological, biochemical, and molecular components of wheat crops. The high temperature might have initially accelerated the thylakoid membrane breakdown, resulting in electrolyte leakage and disruption of all electrochemical processes, particularly photosystem II (PS II)and cytochrome f/b6-mediated reactions have resulted in a drastic decrease in the photosynthesis rate [40,41]. Wheat's PS II is more exposed to extreme temperature stress, as it is a winter season crop instead of a warm-season crop, such as rice and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) [42].
One argument can be further made based on photophosphorylation; high-temperature stress also tends to cause a halt in photophosphorylation due to thylakoid membrane damage [43]. The rate of photosynthetic CO 2 assimilation was lower after stress application than in control (Figure 7b). This has previously been reported in various plant studies. The decrease in net photosynthesis could be attributed to changes in leaf water potential (Figure 7c), stomatal conductance (Figure 7b), the amount or activity of photosynthetic enzymes, and chlorophyll ( Figure 4). According to some experiments, one possible factor in reducing photosynthesis in plants grown under heat stress is the accumulation of carbohydrates in leaves, indicating a feedback inhibition of photosynthesis [43,44]. Other studies have suggested that abiotic stress, particularly salt stress, reduces net respiratory activity in the roots, asserting a feedback mechanism that uses photosynthesis and inhibits plant growth [45,46]. Based on our findings, it appeared that stomatal closure may have contributed to the decreased photosynthetic rate in this experiment, particularly once the nitrogen source, i.e., SCU, was exhausted. Our results are supported by past literature, in which it was found that the nitrogen release timing of the fertilizer was key to the stress survival and nitrogen release from the slow-release fertilizer help in the recovery of the wheat plant once exposed to heat [8], salt stress [11], and waterlogging stress [17].
The wheat plant was able to grow under stress for the first 120 days. The controlled release of nitrogen fertilizer was key to the wheat plant growth, especially in waterlogged and salt stress. Many studies found that a higher grain yield can be attained by applying controlled-release SCU fertilization [23]. SCU increased grain yield efficiently by lowering rhizosphere pH, and the results were consistent with findings of a previous study [47]. Our findings also showed that using SCU N at a rate of 130 kg ha −1 resulted in better growth in the first 120 days in terms of leaf area, biomass gain, photosynthesis rate, fluorescence, SPAD value, etc. However, grain yield, number of grains per spike, grain weight, and harvest index were compromised. These results are supported by past studies that reported the effects of abiotic stress on cardoon [11], wheat genotype [32], and other cash crops [35].
The earlier phase of the experiment (120 days) revealed that controlled-release fertilizers increased total N percent with equal N level application vs. later stages once the nitrogen source, i.e., SCU, was exploited [22]. After stress application, grain yield was decreased by 9.58 to 11.21%, and N uptake was reduced by 19.06 to 23.94 % (Table 4). This was because protein contains nitrogen as an essential constituent, and N is involved in all vital processes of plants. For this reason, nitrogen application is both necessary and unavoidable for crop production [20]. The optimal soil N content increases photosynthetic processes, leaf area production, leaf area duration, and net assimilation rate [33,37]. Since crop yields have increased globally due to increased N use and good management practices [19], all plants, including cereals, oilseeds, fiber, and sugar-producing plants, require a balanced amount of nitrogen for vigorous growth and development in a larger harvest with higher quality. Nitrogen fertilization has also improved Pakistani crops' growth and yield parameters for crops such as wheat, rice, sugarcane, and cotton. Wheat growth and yield parameters such as plant height (cm), number of tillers (m −2 ), number of spikelets (spike −1 ), grains (spike −1 ), and 1000-grain weight have been improved by nitrogen fertilization. Ali et al. [48] also demonstrated that coated urea fertilizer with higher nitrate contents and neem nitrification increased grain yield. Hence, SCU is effective under abiotic stresses once it can control nitrogen release but is no longer effective once the limit is reached. It is suggested to use a more advanced fertilizer with a better nitrogen release period of about 160 days.
Furthermore, screening should be done in soil rather than potting mix. The adverse effects in Vertosol soil were much more apparent and more representative of the actual situation on farms. The chlorophyll fluorescence model proved to be the most suitable for large-scale programs when choosing wheat genotypes for abiotic stress tolerance, requiring only a few seconds per sample. More specific studies at the cellular and tissue levels are needed to understand the fundamental physiological mechanisms fully.

Conclusions
The SCU fertilizer was applied at a recommended rate (130 kg ha −1 ) to increase wheat stress tolerance. The experiment presented the positive possessions of SCU on wheat growth and development, physiological conditions, and nitrogen accumulation under different abiotic stress conditions. After 120 days, all stress types significantly (p < 0.05) reduced plant growth (leaf area, dry biomass, SPAD value, and the number of tillers). However, the crop yield was most compromised in the cases of heat and combined stress. The heat stress showed the lowest grain yield of 3623.47 kg ha −1 , while waterlogging stress showed a better yield of 6034.5 kg ha −1 in all stresses. SCU, used in the current study, has a controlled nitrogen release time that meets nitrogen requirements for up to 120 days only. Hence, the wheat plant was able to tolerate salt and waterlogging stress to some extent. However, once the nitrogen source was exhausted at the time of heat stress, the plant could not tolerate heat stress. Therefore, it is suggested to use SCU with a longer release time to provide nitrogen until the wheat reaches the harvesting stage. In this way, wheat growers, especially farmers in developing countries, can use sustainable ecosystem practices in the salt-affected soils. There is a need to conduct studies on SCU with a release period of~180 days, particularly in heat stress conditions. Another future recommendation for the study is to analyze the nitrogen losses and ecosystem benefits while using slow-release SCU instead of common nitrogen fertilizers. Future research studies, such as modeling ecosystem services and N loss under various crop and climate change scenarios, may also indicate the agricultural system's sustainability.
Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10 .3390/agronomy11112340/s1, Figure S1. Setups for the waterlogging stress (a), control/salt stress (b), and heat stress (c) experiments. Figure S2. Schematic representation of the experimental design. Figure S3. Time bar graph of the whole study. Table S1. Photosynthetic attributes of the wheat plant. Table S2. Properties of the soil used in the study.