Detection and Diagnosis of Xylella fastidiosa by Specific Monoclonal Antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies (MAb) specific to Xylella fastidiosa were obtained through hybridoma technology using heat-treated somatic O antigens from LMG 17159strain. Ten stable hybrydoma clones secreting MAb were selected and their isotype was determined. The MAbs 2G1/PPD, IgG1 showed specificity for X. fastidiosa, detecting all the analyzed strains representing different subspecies, STs and hosts. Polyclonal antibodies (PAb) against X. fastidiosa were also produced and antiserum 17159-O/IVIA was selected for the highest titre and its excellent detection capability. MAb 2G1/PPD was tested against strain IVIA 5235 in PBS and in spiked raw extract samples from almond, olive, citrus, and other hosts and its sensitivity by DAS-ELISA was 104 CFU mL−1. The MAb also reacted with high affinity and avidity against X. fastidiosa by DASI-ELISA and Tissue print-ELISA. The diagnostic parameters of DAS-ELISA based on MAb were calculated and compared with the gold standard real-time PCR. The diagnostic specificity of MAb2G1/PPD was 100%, the diagnostic sensitivity was 88.5% compared to Harper’s real-time PCR and 89.9% compared to Francis’ real-time PCR. The agreement between the techniques was almost perfect according to the estimated Cohen’s kappa-index, even in symptomless almond trees. The developed immunological techniques represent sustainable and low-cost analysis tools, based on specific, homogeneous, and well-characterized MAbs, which can be obtained in unlimited quantities in a reproducible way and constitute a guarantee for the standardization of commercial kits. They are a valuable option within a polyphasic strategy for the detection of X. fastidiosa.


Introduction
Xylella fastidiosa is one of the fifteen quarantine bacteria of highest phytopathological interest in the European Union (EU) [1]. It causes damaging diseases in strategic crops of socio-economic importance, and in ornamental and wild plants of a wide variety of botanical species [2]; the overall number of host plants in the last update by EFSA reached 595 plant species, 275 genera, and 85 families [2]. This pathogen is disseminated over long distances by the uncontrolled movement of infected, but frequently symptomless, plant material, and it is naturally transmitted by different species of insect vectors that spread the bacterium locally in a persistent and efficient manner [3][4][5][6].
X. fastidiosa is currently present in several European countries, mainly in Italy, France, and Spain [7], where a number of areas are under eradication or containment strategies in order to avoid dissemination of this quarantine organism [8]. The impact of the diseases caused by X. fastidiosa is very high, both in terms of production losses and the number of hectares affected [4]. In fact, in the Mediterranean area there are strategic crops for the Agronomy 2021, 11, 48 3 of 14 culture and freezer storage offers the advantage of the reproducibility of MAbs over time and in different laboratories [22]. MAbs for X. fastidiosa were reported long time ago by Garnier et al. [23], but they were not evaluated or characterized and are not available.
In summary, integrated protocols for the detection of bacteria are advised, which include the use of molecular and serological techniques as screening methods, followed by confirmation using techniques supported by different biological principles [24]. The choice of the most accurate and suitable detection method is crucial and should be related to the final purpose of the analysis, especially in areas with the presence of X. fastidiosa, where extensive surveys and testing are required. It would be very useful to be able to include in the flowchart for the diagnosis of X. fastidiosa of the EPPO standard [6] the use of immunological methods based on MAbs.
The purpose of this research was to develop a useful specific tool and immunological methods for the detection of X. fastidiosa in large-scale programs that meet the requirements of speed, simplicity, low price, and accuracy desirable in a diagnostic technique intended for this purpose. This work demonstrates that the selected MAb2G1/PPDis a very promising tool that can be used for an accurate detection of X. fastidiosa by DAS-ELISA, tissue print-ELISA or by other sustainable serological techniques in massive monitoring programs, essential for the development of appropriate integrated management approaches to prevent the spread and establishment of this quarantine pathogen into new areas in the EU members and other countries.

Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions
The Xylella fastidiosa bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Strain LMG 17159 was used as antigen to raise the monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). Strain IVIA5235and strain Xc161 (Streptococcus mutans) were used as a positive and negative control, respectively, in DAS-ELISA and DASI-ELISA tests.The other strains listed were tested for reactivity against the obtained MAbs. All X. fastidiosa strains were routinely grown on PD2 medium [25] and incubated at 26 • C for at least 6 days. Strains belonging to other genera of plant pathogenic bacteria tested for specificity studies are shown in Table 2, and they were grown on yeast peptone glucose agar (YPGA) medium [26] and incubated at 25 • C for 48 h.

Plant Material
For the comparative sensitivity tests, 233 field samples, with and without X. fastidiosa-suspicious symptoms, from woody plant species such as almond (Prunus dulcis), olive (Olea europaea), sweet orange (Citrus sinensis), oleander (Nerium oleander), lavender (Lavandula spp.), Prunus spp., fig tree (Ficus carica), grapevine (Vitis vinifera),bay leaf (Laurus nobilis), Calicotome sp., rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), Polygala myrtifolia, Cistus spp., Helychrisum spp., and Phagnalon spp. collected in different areas of Spain and received at the National Reference Laboratory of Phytopathogenic Bacteria (IVIA) of the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, were analyzed for serological detection of X. fastidiosa. Plants of each analyzed species kept at IVIA greenhouse facilities were also used as a source of healthy control plant material.

Production and Characterization of Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies against X. fastidiosa
For the production of MAbs, suspensions of heat-treated cells (somatic O antigen) of strain LMG 17159 in 10mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 10 9 CFU mL −1 (OD 600 = 1.2) were used to prepare bacterial antigens. To obtain heat-treated cells, 1mL aliquots of the suspensions were subjected to 100 • C for 10 min and kept frozen at −20 • C until use. Production of hybrid cells secreting Mabs specific for X. fastidiosa was performed by fusion between a non-secreting mouse myeloma and spleen cells from X. fastidiosaimmunized mice. BALB/c mice were immunized by intraperitoneal injection of 0.1 mL X. fastidiosa preparation (20 µg protein) emulsified in an equal volume of complete Freund's Agronomy 2021, 11, 48 4 of 14 adjuvant (Difco). Mice were subsequently injected with the same amount of preparation in incomplete Freund's adjuvant 15 and 30 days later. For 3 days before fusion, mice were injected with a daily dose of 10 µg X. fastidiosa. Hybridization was carried out by using the line X63-Ag8-653, according to Vela et al. [27]. Determination of MAb isotypes antibody purification were performed as [27]. The production of six PAbs was done in Californian x Neozelander rabbits using heattreated cells as previously described (somatic O antigen) of strains LMG17159, LMG 15099 and Conn Creeck in 10mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 10 9 CFU mL −1 (OD 600 = 1.2). The immunization started by an intramuscular injection of the antigen mixed with Freund's incomplete adjuvant, that was done every ten days followed by the same dose of 1 mL/injection, for a total of two months. Indirect ELISA evaluated the titer after the last booster immunizing injection by sensitizing polystyrene microplates (Polysorp; Nunc) with 100 µL of the homologous antigen, according to the conventional standard [28]. The antisera were sterilized by filtration and stored at −70 • C. Immunoglobulins were purified from antiserum 17159-O.

Ethics Statement
The Balb/c mice and the rabbits used to produce the antibodies described here were housed and handled at INGENASA facilities in accordance with the European legislation regarding animal welfare in research at that moment [29]. At the end of the experiment, animals were kept alive according to the requirements [29] for their use in subsequent experiments, and they received appropriate care under the supervision of a competent specialist.

Double Antibody Sandwich Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (DAS-ELISA)
DAS-ELISA with alkaline phosphatase system (DAS-ELISA MAb), according to EPPO protocol PM7/101 [28] with minor modifications, was used to determine the reactivity and specificity of the different generated MAbs. The reactivity was determined using 21 X. fastidiosa strains from different subspecies, STs and hosts isolated in six countries worldwide. In addition, strains representing other species from different bacterial genera also pathogenic to various plant hosts were included for the specificity assay. Polystyrene microplates (Polysorp F96; Nunc) were used. The wells were coated with 200 µL of purified immunoglobulins at 2 µg mL −1 , incubated for 4 h at 37 • C and washed. Then, 200 µL of each bacterial suspension were added (two wells per each sample), plates incubated for 16 h at 4 • C and then washed. Alkaline phosphatase conjugated Ig was added, incubated for 4 h at 37 • C and washed again. The OD 405 readings (ELISA values) were made at 30, 60, and 90min after substrate incubation at room temperature in a TitertekMultiskan (Flow) reader. Values greater than a twice those of the negative control were considered positive (values of the negative control minor than 0.100 were considered as 0.100). Strain IVIA 5235 and strain Xc161 were included as positive and negative controls, respectively.

Double Antibody Sandwich Indirect Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (DASI-ELISA)
DASI-ELISA was basically performed according to EPPO standard [28]. Polystyrene microplates (Polysorp F96; Nunc) were used. The wells were coated with 200µl/well purified polyclonal immunoglobulins at 2 µg/mL in carbonate buffer as trapping/coating antibodies. Twenty X. fastidiosa strains were used to determine the reactivity and specificity. The intermediate Mab was used as detecting antibody and goat anti-mouse immunoglobulins alkaline phosphatase linked (Sigma, A-3562) were used as conjugate. The OD 405 readings (ELISA values) were made at 30, 60, and 90 min after substrate incubation at room temperature in a TitertekMultiskan (Flow) reader. Values greater than a twice those of the negative control were considered positive (values of the negative control minor than 0.100 were considered as 0.100). Strain IVIA 5235 and strain Xc161 were included as positive and negative controls, respectively.

Direct Tissue Print-ELISA or Direct Tissue Blot Immunoassay (DTBIA) in Naturally Infected Samples
Twenty-eight samples collected from a commercial orchard of almond trees located at the demarcated area for X. fastidiosa in Alicante (Valencian Community, Spain), and 12 samples of olive trees from Ibiza (Balearic Islands, Spain), were analyzed by tissue print-ELISA as previously described [23,30]. Fresh cuts of petioles and shoots were pressed onto nitrocellulose membranes, covered with 1% solution of bovine serum albumin (BSA) with 1% ethanol and incubated overnight at 4 • C with a slight shaking. A solution of specific monoclonal antibodies against X. fastidiosa linked to alkaline phosphatase was added over the membranes, incubated for 4 h at room temperature and washed three times (washing buffer: PBS, pH 7.2-7.4 with 0.05% Tween 20) by shaking. Precipitating substrate for alkaline phosphatase (BCIP/NBT, Sigma Fast, Sigma) was added and incubated until a purple-violet color precipitates appears in the positive control. Prints of petioles of almond and olive trees maintained at IVIA greenhouse facilities were used as healthy controls, whereas prints of petioles of infected almond and olive trees previously tested positive by real-time PCR were used as positive controls. Membranes were observed under a binocular at low-power magnification (X10-X20). Presence of purple-violet color precipitates in the xylem area indicated the presence of X. fastidiosa.

Sensitivity in DAS-ELISA and DASI-ELISA
Sensitivity of MAb was determined by DAS-ELISA (MAb based), as described above, by using 10-fold serial dilutions of strain IVIA5235 in PBS at a range of concentrations from 10 8 to 10 CFUmL −1 . Furthermore, sensitivity was also determined in spiked healthy plant material. To this end, 1 g of petioles of each host was macerated with 10 mL of extraction buffer (EB) (PBS pH 7.2 + 0.2% DIECA+ 2%PVP-10, sterilized by filtration) in sterile plastic bags (Bioreba), and then aliquots of 1mL of extracts were spiked with strain IVIA5235 at 10 8 to 10 CFUmL −1 concentrations and frozen at −20 • C until use. The same antigen dilutions were used by DASI-ELISA to estimate the sensitivity in serial dilutions of almond and olive tree spiked crude plant extract samples. Spiked olive and almond plant material was also used to compare sensitivity of the new DAS-ELISA using MAb with the DAS-ELISA based on PAb antibodies commercially available (Loewe Biochemica, Germany. Catalog number 07119S/1000).

Detection of X. fastidiosaby DAS-ELISA Mab in Naturally Infected Samples
Almond and olive tree plant samples from commercial orchards in the Demarcated Area for X. fastidiosa in Alicante (Spain), and the 233 samples described in Section 2.2. were processed according to EPPO diagnostic standard for X. fastidiosa [6] and analyzed by DAS-ELISA using the selected MAb.

Comparison of DAS-ELISA MAb and Real-Time PCR for Detection of X. fastidiosa
Aliquots from naturally infected plant samples processed as described above were analyzed in parallel by DAS-ELISA Mab and two standard protocols for real-time PCR according to EPPO [6]: Harper et al. [31] and Francis et al. [32], previous DNA extraction by CTAB method [6]. In order to compare the results of the different methods used, and evaluate the use of DAS-ELISA MAb as a new diagnostic tool, contingency tables were calculated. Diagnostic specificity, diagnostic sensitivity, false positive and negative ratings and relative accuracy were calculated according to Olmos et al. [33] and EPPO standard [6]. The agreement between techniques was evaluated using Cohen's kappa index [34], which indicates the proportion of agreement beyond that expected by chance. The benchmarks of Landis and Koch [35] were used to categorize Cohen's kappa index, where <0.00 is poor agreement, 0 to 0.2 is slight agreement, 0.21 to 0.40 is fair agreement, 0.41 to 0.60 is moderate agreement, 0.61 to 0.80 is substantial agreement, and 0.81 to 1.00 is almost perfect agreement. All data were also subjected to the McNemar χ2 test [36] to detect bias effect, which affects Cohen's kappa index results [37].

Production of Monoclonal Antibodies (MAb) and Polyclonal Antibodies
A total of 10 stable hybrydoma clones secreting MAb against X. fastidiosa with the highest titres in the screening by indirect-ELISA (I-ELISA) were selected.Isotypes were determined, resulting in four MAb being Ig G 1 , five being Ig G 2b and one being IgG 2a . Three Mab, that is 2G1/PPD (isotype IgG 1 ), 1C6/PPD (IgG 1 ), and 9F7/PPD (IgG 2 ) were initially selected for their high affinity to react against the bacterial antigens, high avidity as well as wide reaction spectrum against different X. fastidiosa strains. Then, immunoglobulins of the three MAb were purified by affinity chromatography in columns, conjugated with alkaline phosphatase, and combinations of those three MAb tested by DAS-ELISA MAb. The highest affinity and avidity were obtained using MAb 2G1/PPD for both uses, as coating antibodies to sensitize plates and as conjugate. Therefore, a system of DAS-ELISA was developed using MAb 2G1/PPD, as well as a DASI-ELISA coating with purified polyclonal immunoglogulins from a selected antiserum (see above). A

Reactivity in Several Techniques and Specificity
The MAb 2G1/PPD reacted with all the X. fastidiosa strains tested, representative of isolates of the subspecies fastidiosa, pauca, multiplex, and sandyi from nine plant species and six countries, in both the DAS-ELISA and the DASI-ELISA. All other tested strains belonging to other genera, from different hosts and origins, gave negative result, so no cross-reactions were observed.
Also, MAb 2G1/PPD reacted specifically with all samples analyzed by tissue print-ELISA (or DBTIA). The 12 olive tree samples tested were positives for both tecniques: tissue print-ELISA MAb2G1/PPD and Harper's real-time PCR. Out of the 28 samples of almond tree tested, 20 were positive by tissue print-ELISA MAb2G1/PPD while 25 were positive by real-time PCR. Three samples were negative by the two assayed techniques. The diagnostic sensitivity resulted 87.5% compared to the gold standard Harper's real-time PCR. It is remarkable to note that the assay included field symptomatic and symptomless samples.

Sensitivity
The sensitivity of the DAS-ELISA using MAb 2G1/PPD with serial ten-fold dilutions of strain IVIA5235 in PBS, expressed as the lowest amount of pathogen detected, was 10 4 CFUmL −1 . The same limit was reached in spiked extracts from samples of almond, olive, citrus, oleander, lavender, and rosemary plants, while in blueberry was 10 5 CFUmL −1 . When the sensitivity of the MAb 2G1/PPD obtained in DAS-ELISA was compared with the reaction of the commercial polyclonal antibodies from Loewe in almond and olive trees extracts, the same sensitivity of 10 4 CFU mL −1 was obtained (Figure 1).
The DASI-ELISA using PAb from antiserum 17159-O/IVIA and MAb 2G1/PPD also reached a sensitivity of 10 4 CFU of X. fastidiosa per mL of almond and olive tree extracts.
citrus, oleander, lavender, and rosemary plants, while in blueberry was 10 5 CFUmL −1 . When the sensitivity of the MAb 2G1/PPD obtained in DAS-ELISA was compared with the reaction of the commercial polyclonal antibodies from Loewe in almond and olive trees extracts, the same sensitivity of 10 4 CFU mL −1 was obtained (Figure 1).
The DASI-ELISA using PAb from antiserum 17159-O/IVIA and MAb 2G1/PPD also reached a sensitivity of 10 4 CFU of X. fastidiosa per mL of almond and olive tree extracts.   (Table 6).  (Table 6).

Discussion
Immunological methods based on specific, homogeneous and well characterized antibodies are among the tools within a polyphasic strategy for the detection of X. fastidiosa. These methods can drastically increase the number of analyzed samples with good accuracy when based on specific MAbs [9,11,14]. The successful use of specific MAbs produced in this work by different direct and indirect serological techniques, such as DAS and DASI-ELISA, and tissue print-ELISA, show the ability of these antibodies to recognize X. fastidiosa. The intensity of the serological reaction suggests a high affinity and avidity of the selected MAbs to the antigenic determinants or detectable antigens of the target. These MAbs against X. fastidiosa, available for the first time, showed their usefulness and have been validated in this work as a reliable tool for the detection, identification, and diagnosis of this important phytopathogenic bacterium.
Interestingly, the selected MAbs, in particular 2G1/PPD (isotype IgG 1 ), proved to be highly specific for X. fastidiosa, detecting all the strains analyzed representing different subspecies, STs and hosts. The high serological relationship observed by both DASI-ELISA and DAS-ELISA among the different X. fastidiosa strains tested, mainly with the MAb2G1/PPD, suggests that it recognizes a widespreadand well conserved X. fastidiosa epitope or antigenic determinant shared among the different strains. In the development of a rapid and large-scale diagnostic tool, species level recognition is the most suitable strategy, so that none of the variants that may be involved are left out, since co-infection of X. fastidiosa strains from different subspecies have been found in individual samples [38]. Furthermore, the MAbs obtained were highly specific because no cross reactions were observed against other phytopathogenic bacteria tested, not even with phylogenetically related strains of the genus Xanthomonas, nor with the usual microbiota of the host plants routinely analyzed.
When comparing the developed DAS-ELISA based on MAb2G1/PPD with the commercially available kit of Loewe based on polyclonal antibodies from antisera, both systems achieved the same sensitivity in both pure cultures and spiked samples, but the MAbs showed less background noise. In fact, leaf extracts of different plant species were tested and no significant differences in sensitivity were found between them, which demonstrates the general usefulness of DAS-ELISA MAb2G1/PPD for X. fastidiosa detection in a wide range of hosts, suggesting that there is not a remarkable influence of the plant material in its sensitivity. This may indicate that DAS-ELISA MAb2G1/PPD is not affected by the presence of potential inhibitors, like phenolic compounds, which is an advantage over molecular detection methodologies [26]. In the naturally infected samples analyzed, those that gave negative results by DAS-ELISA MAb2G1/PPD (n = 15 respect to Harper's realtime PCR and n = 12 respect to Francis' real-time PCR) belonged to different plant species, so no correlation was found between type of host and the negative result attributable to inhibition. What probably happens is that in trees with recent infections, the load of X. fastidiosa is very low, below the detection limit. Nevertheless, the overall capacity of DAS-ELISA MAb2G1/PPD for the detection of X. fastidiosa in different plant matrices can be considered excellent, since the pathogen was detected by the MAb in almond tree samples showing or not leaf scorch symptoms.
The sensitivity of 10 4 -10 5 CFU mL −1 is similar to that reported with other DAS-ELISA for this pathogen [39] and better (one order of magnitude lower) than that of the commercially available DAS-ELISA from Agdia, as reported in an interesting comparison between serological and molecular methods [40]. The DAS-ELISA sensitivity of 10 4 CFU mL −1 is enough for X. fastidiosa detection not only in symptomatic samples from areas with high pathogen prevalence, but also in samples from areas with low presence of the pathogen, even if they remain asymptomatic for long periods. In fact, in the area of olive epidemics in Puglia (Italy), conventional PCR and ELISA proved to be equally effective, but ELISA was chosen for the large-scale monitoring programs in the demarcated area due to the simplicity of sample preparation that allows to process a higher number of samples [41]. Diagnostic specificity of the DAS-ELISA MAb 2G1/PPD was the same (100%) when compared to both real-time PCR techniques, and diagnostic sensitivity was only slightly lower compared to Harper's real-time PCR (88.5%) than to Francis' real-time PCR (89.9%).
Naturally infected samples used in this study included different plant species and several plant tissues, i.e., leaves of different ages and, in some cases, wood. Remarkably, there were no false positives by DAS-ELISA MAb 2G1/PPD. This is particularly interesting because the occurrence of false positives in ELISA for the diagnosis of X. fastidiosa by polyclonal antibodies had been reported [19], not only in relation to the need to block non-specific binding sites [42], but also in relation to the potential activity of plant peroxidases [43]. It is also worth mentioning that some plant tissues did not seem more suitable than others for the detection of X. fastidiosa by DAS-ELISA MAb 2G1/PPD. This is important because, depending on the season, the use of one plant tissue or another may be more convenient [6], and this fact would not influence the detection efficiency by DAS-ELISA based on the produced MAbs, at least in almond and olive tree samples.
A comparison of the relative accuracy obtained between DAS-ELISA MAb2G1/PPD and the gold standard real-time PCR (93.5-94.4%) demonstrates a strong correlation between the assayed techniques. In the analysis of almond tree samples from the demarcated area of Alicante (Spain), our results show a substantial or almost perfect agreement [35] between the DAS-ELISA MAb2G1/PPD and the two real-time protocols validated by EPPO [6]. This indicates the suitability of the serological techniques developed for X. fastidiosa diagnosis and detection. Cohen's kappa coefficient [34] constitutes a recognized method for evaluating agreement between two diagnostic techniques. This coefficient does not reveal which technique is better, but indicates how often they give the same results. In this work the detection results obtained by two different protocols of real-time PCR, considered gold standard, were compared with those obtained with the same field samples by DAS-ELISA based on the selected MAb 2G1/PPD. The agreement 0.94 was substantial with Harper's real-time PCR and it was 0.93, almost perfect, with Francis' real-time PCR, based on kappa index of agreement of Cohen and McNemar test with a highly significant p value. The McNemar χ2 test indicated that bias was no significant, and Cohen's kappa index remained strong. In a recent work, Waliullahet al. [40] also found a high correlation between DAS-ELISA and real-time PCR for field and greenhouse collected blueberry samples infected with X. fastidiosa. It is known that the sensitivity of real-time PCR is better than that of ELISA, and this, together with the lack of expertise and equipment for serology in many laboratories of EU countries, has probably been the reason why this method has been excluded from the Implementing Regulation of the Commission (EU) 2020/1201 [8]. However, the results of this work show that serological techniques such as the ELISA developed with the MAbs, which has a high specificity, could be applied to the processing of a large number of samples. Thus, only those samples with negative results could be processed by real-time PCR to overcome false negative results by ELISA due to a low bacterial load.
To avoid the rapid increase of the pathogen population in a given crop, a consistent and early detection protocol is necessary, but, frequently, the use of a single method may not produce 100% diagnostic certainty. In international diagnostic standards it is advisable to use at least two tests based on different biological principles [6], particularly in areas apparently free of X. fastidiosa or those under containment strategy. The benefit of any detection technique depends on its simplicity, specificity, sensitivity, robustness, cost-effectiveness, and suitability in all circumstances [40]. The MAb based DAS-ELISA developed in this study represents a sustainable and low-cost alternative compared to other methods currently used for X. fastidiosa detection. Like the PCR-based methods, it exhibits high specificity; samples that gave positive results with PCR also reacted by DAS-ELISA MAb2G1/PPD. In contrast to the PCR-based methods, the developed DAS-ELISA can be easily performed in laboratories with a basic structure for microbiology work, even in plant nurseries, and the high performance of these MAbs could also be used for the development of a 'lab-on-a-chip'device such as the one developed for the CoDiRO strain by Chiriacòet al. [44], and for other immunological techniques such as tissue print-ELISA, immunofluorescence or lateral flow devices. Especially, tissue print-ELISA is a simple, low-cost, fast, sensitive and accurate way to analyze many samples from nurseries, gardens or large surveys, as clearly showed in other pathosystems [11] and demonstrated in Italy for olive trees testing [20]. The specificity would be guaranteed by the use of MAbs, and also speed, simplicity, low analysis cost, and accuracy, which are characteristics desirable in a diagnostic technique [45].

Conclusions
Specific MAbs have been developed against X. fastidiosa. They are a versatile tool that can be used in several immunological techniques. These MAbs are promising for a universal utilization, and a further validation with a wider spectrum of X. fastidiosa strains is pending to be completed. The comparison of DAS-ELISA with the selected MAbs with the current gold standard real-time PCR for the analysis of X. fastidiosa in naturally infected plant material revealed that the developed immunological protocol is specific, sensitive and reliable. The obtained Mabs and the ELISA protocol can be used for the large scale surveys of host plants, constituting a very valuable contribution to the management of this harmful pathogen.