Isolation of Cellulose Nanofibers from Kombucha Beverage By-Product by Chemo-Mechanical Routes
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Isolation of Cellulose Nanofibers from the Kombucha Membrane
2.3. Characterization
3. Results
3.1. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
3.2. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
3.3. X-Ray Diffraction
3.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis
3.5. Polarized Optical Microscopy
3.6. Scanning Electron Microscopy
3.7. Atomic Force Microscopy
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Uşurelu, C.D.; Panaitescu, D.M. Nanocellulose/nanodiamond hybrids: A review. Macromol 2023, 3, 400–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nitodas, S.; Skehan, M.; Liu, H.; Shah, R. Current and potential applications of green membranes with nanocellulose. Membranes 2023, 13, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, W.J.; Katakojwala, R.; Lee, H.-S. Microcrystalline cellulose production from agricultural byproducts: Evaluation of environmental impacts through life cycle assessment. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 507, 160224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elegbeleye, O. Global impact of environmental sustainability on deforestation. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2015, 6, 103–115. [Google Scholar]
- Tausif, M.; Jabbar, A.; Naeem, M.S.; Basit, A.; Ahmad, F.; Cassidy, T. Cotton in the new millennium: Advances, economics, perceptions and problems. Text. Prog. 2018, 50, 1–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panaitescu, D.M.; Oprea, M.; Frone, A.N.; Trică, B.; Popa-Tudor, I.; Ghiurea, M.; Nicolae, C.-A.; Gabor, A.R.; Oprică, G.M.; Uşurelu, C.D.; et al. Valorization of spent lignocellulosic substrate of edible mushrooms into cellulose nanofibers for bionanocomposites production. J. Polym. Environ. 2024, 32, 6618–6635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wijaya, C.J.; Ismadji, S.; Gunawan, S. A review of lignocellulosic-derived nanoparticles for drug delivery applications: Lignin nanoparticles, xylan nanoparticles, and cellulose nanocrystals. Molecules 2021, 26, 676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magalhães, S.; Fernandes, C.; Pedrosa, J.F.S.; Alves, L.; Medronho, B.; Ferreira, P.J.T.; Rasteiro, M.d.G. Eco-friendly methods for extraction and modification of cellulose: An overview. Polymers 2023, 15, 3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eslahi, N.; Mahmoodi, A.; Mahmoudi, N.; Zandi, N.; Simchi, A. Processing and properties of nanofibrous bacterial cellulose-containing polymer composites: A review of recent advances for biomedical applications. Polym. Rev. 2020, 60, 144–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, W.S.; Chen, H.H. Physical properties of bacterial cellulose composites for wound dressings. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 53, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dima, S.O.; Panaitescu, D.M.; Orban, C.; Ghiurea, M.; Doncea, S.-M.; Fierascu, R.C.; Nistor, C.L.; Alexandrescu, E.; Nicolae, C.-A.; Trică, B.; et al. Bacterial nanocellulose from side-streams of Kombucha beverages production: Preparation and physical-chemical properties. Polymers 2017, 9, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakubczyk, K.; Melkis, K.; Ligenza, A. Compositional and nutritional aspects: Kombucha-type fermented teas. In Tea in Health and Disease Prevention; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2025; Chapter 7; pp. 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panti, N.; Therdtatha, P.; Doungta, S.; Saenkam, S.; Seesuriyachan, P.; Rachtanapun, P.; Sawangrat, K. Microbiological and biochemical characterization, and sensory evaluation of dragon blood tea kombucha. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2024, 51, e2024088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bishop, P.; Pitts, E.R.; Budner, D.; Thompson-Witrick, K.A. Chemical Composition of Kombucha. Beverages 2022, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva Rocha, A.R.F.; Venturim, B.C.; Ellwanger, E.R.A.; Pagnan, C.S.; Silveira, W.B.D.; Martin, J.G.P. Bacterial cellulose: Strategies for its production in the context of bioeconomy. J. Basic Microbiol. 2023, 63, 257–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plaza-Joly, P.; Gallois, A.; Bosc-Rouessac, F.; Drobek, M.; Julbe, A. Synergistic effect of UiO-66 directly grown on Kombucha-derived bacterial cellulose for dye removal. Molecules 2024, 29, 3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, K.Y.; Heng, J.Z.X.; Lin, M.; Li, Z.; Ye, E.; Loh, X.J. Kombucha SCOBY waste as a catalyst support. Chem. Asian J. 2021, 16, 2939–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tritean, N.; Dimitriu, L.; Dima, Ș.O.; Ghiurea, M.; Trică, B.; Nicolae, C.-A.; Moraru, I.; Nicolescu, A.; Cimpean, A.; Oancea, F.; et al. Bioactive hydrogel formulation based on ferulic acid-grafted nano-chitosan and bacterial nanocellulose enriched with selenium nanoparticles from Kombucha fermentation. J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laavanya, D.; Shirkole, S.; Balasubramanian, P. Current challenges, applications and future perspectives of SCOBY cellulose of Kombucha fermentation. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 295, 126454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amarasekara, A.S.; Wang, D.; Grady, T.L. A comparison of kombucha SCOBY bacterial cellulose purification methods. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Shall, F.N.; Al-Shemy, M.T.; Dawwam, G.E. Multifunction smart nanocomposite film for food packaging based on carboxymethyl cellulose/Kombucha SCOBY/pomegranate anthocyanin pigment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242, 125101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popa-Tudor, I.; Tritean, N.; Dima, Ș.O.; Trică, B.; Ghiurea, M.; Cimpean, A.; Oancea, F.; Constantinescu-Aruxandei, D. Kombucha versus vegetal cellulose for affordable mucoadhesive (nano)formulations. Gels 2025, 11, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bovi, J.; Butto, M.; Arroyo, S.; Bernal, C.; Foresti, M.L. Bacterial cellulose nanofibrils from a by-product of the growing Kombucha business: Obtention and use in the development of poly(lactic acid) composites. Lat. Am. Appl. Res. 2024, 54, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avcioglu, N.H.; Birben, M.; Seyis Bilkay, I. Optimization and physicochemical characterization of enhanced microbial cellulose production with a new Kombucha consortium. Process Biochem. 2021, 108, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Wang, X.; Wang, P. Microorganisms and bacterial cellulose stability of Kombucha under different manufacture and storage conditions. J. Food Sci. 2024, 89, 2921–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sederavičiūtė, F.; Bekampienė, P.; Domskienė, J. Effect of pretreatment procedure on properties of Kombucha fermented bacterial cellulose membrane. Polym. Test. 2019, 78, 105941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Girard, V.D.; Chaussé, J.; Vermette, P. Bacterial cellulose: A comprehensive review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2024, 141, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panaitescu, D.M.; Frone, A.N.; Chiulan, I.; Casarica, A.; Nicolae, C.A.; Ghiurea, M.; Trusca, R.; Damian, C.M. Structural and morphological characterization of bacterial cellulose nano-reinforcements prepared by mechanical route. Mater. Des. 2016, 110, 790–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinicke, B.; Zahel, M.; Ferreira, I.; Arndt, T.; Naseem, S.; Heckel, S.; Kuehnert, I.; Miletzky, F.; Leuteritz, A. Preparation of cellulose-PCC fibre hybrids: Use as filler in polypropylene (PP) composites. Cellulose 2024, 31, 5043–5054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, D.; Kim, H.-J.; Drzal, L.T. Surface treatment and characterization of natural fibers: Effects on the properties of biocomposites. In Polymer Composites, Biocomposites; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; Volume 3, Chapter 4; pp. 133–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purwidyantri, A.; Karina, M.; Hsu, C.H.; Srikandace, Y.; Prabowo, B.A.; Lai, C.-S. Facile Bacterial Cellulose Nanofibrillation for the Development of a Plasmonic Paper Sensor. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 6, 3122–3131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, B.; Raj, M.C.; Athira, K.B.; Rubiyah, M.H.; Joy, J.; Moores, A.; Drisko, G.L.; Sanchez, C. Nanocellulose, a versatile green platform: From biosources to materials ant their applications. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 11575–11625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pillai, M.M.; Tran, H.N.; Sathishkumar, G.; Manimekalai, K.; Yoon, J.H.; Lim, D.Y.; Noh, I.; Bhattacharyya, A. Symbiotic culture of nanocellulose pellicle: A potential matrix for 3D bioprinting. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021, 11, 111552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wojdyr, M. Fityk: A general-purpose peak fitting program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2010, 43, 1126–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Ugarte, A.S.; Hafez, I.; Tajvidi, M. Characterization and properties of hybrid foams from nanocellulose and kaolin-microfibrillated cellulose composite. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watanabe, A.; Morita, S.; Ozaki, Y. Temperature-dependent changes in hydrogen bonds in cellulose Iα studied by infrared spectroscopy in combination with perturbation-correlation moving-window two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy: Comparison with cellulose Iβ. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 2969–2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.M.; Kubicki, J.D.; Fan, B.; Zhong, L.; Jarvis, M.C.; Kim, S.H. Hydrogen-bonding network and OH stretch vibration of cellulose: Comparison of computational modeling with polarized IR and SFG spectra. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 15138–15149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ling, Z.; Wang, T.; Makarem, M.; Santiago Cintrón, M.; Cheng, H.; Kang, X.; Bacher, M.; Potthast, A.; Rosenau, T.; King, H. Effects of ball milling on the structure of cotton cellulose. Cellulose 2019, 26, 305–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dessiea, A.; Govindanb, N. Eco-friendly, salt-free reactive dyeing by cationization of cotton with amino acids obtained from soya bean hull. J. Text. Sci. Eng. 2018, 8, 1000385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vazquez, A.; Foresti, M.L.; Cerrutti, P.; Galvagno, M. Bacterial Cellulose from Simple and Low Cost Production Media by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J. Polym. Environ. 2013, 21, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kashcheyeva, E.I.; Gismatulina, Y.A.; Mironova, G.F.; Gladysheva, E.K.; Budaeva, V.V.; Skiba, E.A.; Zolotuhin, V.N.; Shavyrkina, N.A.; Kortusov, A.N.; Korchagina, A.A. Properties and Hydrolysis Behavior of Celluloses of Different Origin. Polymers 2022, 14, 3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paiva, W.S.; de Souza Neto, F.E.; Queiroz, M.F.; Batista, L.A.N.C.; Rocha, H.A.O.; de Lima Batista, A.C. Oligochitosan Synthesized by Cunninghamella elegans, a Fungus from Caatinga (The Brazilian Savanna) Is a Better Antioxidant than Animal Chitosan. Molecules 2022, 27, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quiñones-Cerna, C.; Rodríguez-Soto, J.C.; Barraza-Jáuregui, G.; Huanes-Carranza, J.; Cruz-Monzón, J.A.; Ugarte-López, W.; Hurtado-Butrón, F.; Samanamud-Moreno, F.; Haro-Carranza, D.; Valdivieso-Moreno, S.; et al. Bioconversion of Agroindustrial Asparagus Waste into Bacterial Cellulose by Komagataeibacter rhaeticus. Sustainability 2024, 16, 736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Indrianingsih, A.W.; Rosyida, V.T.; Apriyana, W.; Hayati, S.N.; Darsih, C.; Nisa, K.; Ratih, D. Antioxidant and antibacterial properties of bacterial cellulose— Indonesian plant extract composites for mask sheet. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 10, 037–042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Oliveira, A.C.S.; de Oliveira Begali, D.; Ferreira, L.F.; Ugucioni, J.C.; de Sena Neto, A.R.; Yoshida, M.I.; Borges, S.V. Effect of whey protein isolate addition on thermoplasticized pectin packaging properties. J. Food Proc. Eng. 2021, 44, e13910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rolim, A.A.I.; Steffen, T.T.; Becker, D.; Leite, L.R.; Sagás, J.C.; Fontana, L.C.; Bond, D.P. Plasma surface treatment of bacterial cellulose to increase hydrophobicity. Cellulose 2024, 31, 4817–4831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, X.; Ullah, N.; Wang, X.; Sun, X.; Li, C.; Bai, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, Z. Characterization of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, 2217–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.-S.; Han, Y.-H.; Ye, Y.-X.; Shi, X.-X.; Xiang, P.; Chen, D.-L.; Li, M. Physicochemical characterization of high-quality bacterial cellulose produced by Komagataeibacter sp. strain W1 and identification of the associated genes in bacterial cellulose production. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 45145–45155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsalagkas, D.; Lagana, R.; Poljansek, I.; Oven, P.; Csoka, L. Fabrication of bacterial cellulose thin films self-assembled from sonochemically prepared nanofibrils and its characterization. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2016, 28, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kashcheyeva, E.I.; Gladysheva, E.K.; Skiba, E.A.; Budaeva, V.V. A study of properties and enzymatic hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 2019, 26, 2255–2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikbakht, A.; van Zyl, E.M.; Larson, S.; Fenlon, S.; Coburn, J.M. Bacterial Cellulose Purification with Non-Conventional, Biodegradable Surfactants. Polysaccharides 2024, 5, 857–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsague, F.L.; Chimeni, D.Y.; Assonfack, H.L.; Abo, M.T.; Cheumani, A.M.Y.; Ndinteh, D.T.; Ndikontar, M.K. Study of oxidation of cellulose by Fenton-type reactions using alkali metal salts as swelling agents. Cellulose 2024, 31, 6643–6661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maatar, W.; Boufi, S. Poly(methacylic acid-co-maleic acid) grafted nanofibrillated cellulose as a reusable novel heavy metal ions adsorbent. Carbohydr Polym. 2015, 126, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gil-Giraldo, G.A.; Mantovan, J.; Marim, B.M.; Kishima, J.O.F.; Beluci, N.C.L.; Mali, S. Ultrasound-Assisted Process to Increase the Hydrophobicity of Cellulose from Oat Hulls by Surface Modification with Vegetable Oils. Polysaccharides 2024, 5, 463–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, B.; Chen, X.; Shen, Y.; Li, Z.; Ma, X.; Yu, H.Y. Two-response surface design optimization of carboxylated CNCs with super high thermal stability and dye removal capability. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 342, 122395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Du, H.; Liu, K.; Liu, H.; Xu, T.; Zhang, S.; Chen, X.; Zhang, R.; Li, H.; Xie, H.; et al. Sustainable preparation of bifunctional cellulose nanocrystals via mixed H2SO4/formic acid hydrolysis. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 266, 118107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandra, R.; Bharagava, R.N.; Rai, V. Melanoidins as major colourant in sugarcane molasses based distillery effluent and its degradation. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4648–4660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Björnerbäck, F.; Hedin, N. Microporous Humins Prepared from Sugars and Bio-Based Polymers in Concentrated Sulfuric Acid. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 1018–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topalovic, T.; Nierstrasz, V.A.; Bautista, L.; Jocic, D.; Navarro, A.; Warmoeskerken, M.M.C.G. XPS and contact angle study of cotton surface oxidation by catalytic bleaching. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007, 296, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frone, A.N.; Panaitescu, D.M.; Chiulan, I.; Nicolae, C.A.; Casarica, A.; Gabor, A.R.; Trusca, R.; Damian, C.M.; Purcar, V.; Alexandrescu, E.; et al. Surface Treatment of Bacterial Cellulose in Mild, Eco-Friendly Conditions. Coatings 2018, 8, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.; Xiao, Y.; Yin, Q.; Yan, J.W.; Zang, C.F.; Zhang, H.Y. In Situ Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles on Amino-Grafted Polyacrylonitrile Fiber and Its Antibacterial Activity. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peraza-Ku, S.A.; Escobar-Morales, B.; Rodríguez-Fuentes, N.; Cervantes-Uc, J.M.; Uribe-Calderon, J.A. Ceiba pentandra cellulose crosslinked with citric acid for drug release systems. Carbohydr. Res. 2021, 504, 108334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srinivasan, S.; Venkatachalam, S. One pot green process for facile fractionation of sorghum biomass to lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose nanoparticles using deep eutectic solvent. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 277, 134295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Liu, D.; Tian, Y.; Zhai, Y.; Tian, C.; Li, S.; Xing, T.; Li, Z.; Dai, P. Fe3N Nanoparticle-Encapsulated N-Doped Carbon Nanotubes on Biomass-Derived Carbon Cloth as Self-Standing Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daniyal, W.M.E.M.M.; Fen, Y.W.; Abdullah, J.; Hashim, H.S.; Fauzi, N.I.M.; Chanlek, N.; Mahdi, M.A. X-ray photoelectron study on gold/nanocrystalline cellulose-graphene oxide thin film as surface plasmon resonance active layer for metal ion detection. Thin Solid Films 2020, 713, 138340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Qian, X.; Yu, Z.; Zheng, X.; Qiao, Y.; Chen, C.; Li, W.; Li, W.; Yang, J.; Zhu, J. A one-dimensional bacterial cellulose nano-whiskers-based binary-drug delivery system for the cancer treatment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 279, 134970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, F.; Zhang, J.; Pedersen, C.M.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, T.; Wang, P.; Liu, Y.; Qian, G.; Qiao, Y. Valorization of Furfural Residue by Hydrothermal Carbonization: Processing Optimization, Chemical and Structural Characterization. Chem. Sel. 2017, 2, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topalovic, T.; Nierstrasz, V.A.; Bautista, L.; Jocic, D.; Navarro, A.; Warmoeskerken, M.M.C.G. Analysis of the effects of catalytic bleaching on cotton. Cellulose 2007, 14, 385–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuki, S.; Kayano, H.; Takada, J.; Kono, H.; Fujisawa, S.; Saito, T.; Isogai, A. Nanocellulose Production via One-Pot Formation of C2 and C3 Carboxylate Groups Using Highly Concentrated NaClO Aqueous Solution. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 17800–17806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, X.; Honda, T.; Asoh, T.A.; Uyama, H. Cellulose modified by citric acid reinforced polypropylene resin as fillers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 230, 115662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Zhao, R.; Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, C.; Liu, J.; Zhu, P. Comparison of bacterial cellulose production by various biomass wastes as culture media. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 309, 143091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singhsa, P.; Narain, R.; Manuspiya, H. Physical structure variations of bacterial cellulose produced by different Komagataeibacter xylinus strains and carbon sources in static and agitated conditions. Cellulose 2018, 25, 1571–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penttilä, P.A.; Imai, T.; Capron, M.; Mizuno, M.; Amano, Y.; Schweins, R.; Sugiyama, J. Multimethod approach to understand the assembly of cellulose fibrils in the biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 2018, 25, 2771–2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Wu, D.; Liao, W.; Pei, W.; Liu, Y.; Gu, J.; Wang, P.; Lan, K.; Huang, C. Constructing osteo-inductive bio-ink for 3D printing through hybridization of gelatin with maleic acid modified bacterial cellulose by regulating addition volumes of maleic acid solution. J. Biores. Bioprod. 2024, 9, 336–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roman, M.; Winter, W.T. Effect of sulfate groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behavior of bacterial cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5, 1671–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, M.W.; Subhan, F.; Manan, S. Impact of structural features of acetylated bacterial cellulose on cell-scaffold and scaffold-blood interactions In Vitro. Cellulose 2023, 30, 10373–10399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, S.; Mathur, G. Investigating the effect of alkali treatment on physicochemical characteristics of Bacterial Cellulose synthesized by Komagataeibacter saccharivorans BC-G1. Microbe 2025, 7, 100340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinyakit, Y.; Trachoo, V.; Suwanwong, Y.; Chanamuangkon, T.; Sae-Ear, P.; Srijunbarl, A.; Hoven, V.P. Shape adaptive bacterial cellulose-based sponge for hemostasis applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 306, 141694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fitriani, F.; Aprilia, S.; Arahman, N.; Bilad, M.R.; Amin, A.; Huda, N.; Roslan, J. Isolation and Characterization of Nanocrystalline Cellulose Isolated from Pineapple Crown Leaf Fiber Agricultural Wastes Using Acid Hydrolysis. Polymers 2021, 13, 4188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khiabani, A.; Sarabi-Jamab, M.; Shakeri, M.S.; Pahlevanlo, A.; Emadzadeh, B. Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: Optimization strategy using iranian nabat industry waste. Heliyon 2024, 10, e35986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santana, R.M.d.R.; Napoleão, D.C.; Rodriguez-Diaz, J.M.; Gomes, R.K.d.M.; Silva, M.G.; Garcia, R.R.P.; Vinhas, G.M.; Duarte, M.M.M.B. Original nanostructured bacterial cellulose/pyrite composite: Photocatalytic application in advanced oxidation processes. Chemosphere 2023, 319, 137953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Eusanio, V.; Lezza, A.; Anderlini, B.; Malferrari, D.; Romagnoli, M.; Roncaglia, F. Technological Prospects of Biochar Derived from Viticulture Waste: Characterization and Application Perspectives. Energies 2024, 17, 3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gea, S.; Reynolds, C.T.; Roohpour, N.; Wirjosentono, B.; Soykeabkaew, N.; Bilotti, E.; Peijs, T. Investigation into the structural, morphological, mechanical and thermal behaviour of bacterial cellulose after a two-step purification process. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 9105–9110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fadakar Sarkandi, A.; Montazer, M.; Mahmoudi Rad, M. Oxygenated-bacterial-cellulose nanofibers with hydrogel, antimicrobial, and controlled oxygen release properties for rapid wound healing. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 139, 51974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabiac, A.; Guillon, E.; Chambon, F.; Pinel, C.; Rataboul, F.; Essayem, N. Cellulose reactivity and glycosidic bond cleavage in aqueous phase by catalytic and non catalytic transformations. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2011, 402, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meftahi, A.; Khajavi, R.; Rashidi, A.; Rahimi, M.K.; Bahador, A. Preventing the collapse of 3D bacterial cellulose network via citric acid. J. Nanostructure Chem. 2018, 8, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.; Luzi, F.; Yang, W.; Xiao, Z.; Torre, L.; Xie, Y.; Puglia, D. Citric Acid as Green Modifier for Tuned Hydrophilicity of Surface Modified Cellulose and Lignin Nanoparticles. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 9966–9978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zhang, F.; Zhong, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, P.; Tian, F.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, R.; Cullen, P.J. Emerging Food Packaging Applications of Cellulose Nanocomposites: A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 4025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemnaru, G.M.; Motelica, L.; Trusca, R.D.; Ilie, C.I.; Croitoru, A.-M.; Ficai, D.; Oprea, O.; Stoica-Guzun, A.; Ficai, A.; Ditu, L.-M.; et al. Antimicrobial Wound Dressings based on Bacterial Cellulose and Independently Loaded with Nutmeg and Fir Needle Essential Oils. Polymers 2023, 15, 3629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosli, N.A.; Anuar, F.H.; Abdullah, I.; Ahmad, I. Influence of alkali treatment on mechanical and morphological properties of single agave angustifolia fibre. J. Polym. Sci. Technol. 2021, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J.; Zheng, Y.; Yang, Z.; Cui, Q.; Wang, Q.; Gao, S.; Ding, X. Chemical modifications and characteristic changes in bacterial cellulose treated with different media. J. Polym. Res. 2012, 19, 9945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brodin, F.W.; Eriksen, Ø. Preparation of individualised lignocellulose microfibrils based on thermomechanical pulp and their effect on paper properties. Nord Pulp Paper Res. J. 2015, 30, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koshani, R.; Van De Ven, T.G.M.; Madadlou, A. Characterization of Carboxylated Cellulose Nanocrytals Isolated through Catalyst-Assisted H2O2 Oxidation in a One-Step Procedure. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 7692–7700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, P.; Tian, J.; Liu, T.; Guo, J.; Zhu, W.; Khan, M.R.; Xiao, H.; Song, J. Effects of hydrolysis conditions on the morphology of cellulose II nanocrystals (CNC-II) derived from mercerized microcrystalline cellulose. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 258, 128936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez-López, L.; Eugenio, M.E.; Ibarra, D.; Darder, M.; Martín, J.A.; Martín-Sampedro, R. Cellulose Nanofibers from a Dutch Elm Disease-Resistant Ulmus minor Clone. Polymers 2020, 12, 2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]











| Sample | Atomic Concentration (%) | O/C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O 1s | C 1s | Si 2p | N 1s | ||
| KBC | 31.9 ± 1.2 | 66.0 ± 1.1 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.48 ± 0.03 |
| KBC-NaOH | 38.7 ± 1.0 | 59.9 ± 0.6 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.65 ± 0.02 |
| KBC-NaClO | 36.4 ± 0.6 | 61.1 ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 0.60 ± 0.01 |
| KBC-H2O2 | 35.7 ± 2.2 | 62.2 ± 2.3 | 0.5 ± 0.4 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 0.58 ± 0.06 |
| KBC-H2SO4 | 32.6 ± 1.1 | 65.2 ± 1.0 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.50 ± 0.02 |
| KBC-citric | 34.2 ± 0.1 | 62.9 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.7 | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 0.54 ± 0.00 |
| Sample | Atomic Concentration (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | |
| KBC | 34.2 | 58.6 | 6.0 | 1.2 |
| KBC-NaOH | 22.3 | 66.6 | 9.6 | 1.5 |
| KBC-NaClO | 19.2 | 67.3 | 9.6 | 3.9 |
| KBC-H2O2 | 12.0 | 68.6 | 14.5 | 4.9 |
| KBC-H2SO4 | 26.0 | 65.0 | 7.1 | 1.9 |
| KBC-citric | 31.3 | 56.7 | 8.7 | 3.3 |
| Sample | Tonset (°C) | WL200 °C (%) | Tmax1 (°C) | Tmax2 (°C) | R750 °C (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KBC | 318.0 | 3.9 | 333.0 | 644.9 | 0.25 |
| KBC-NaOH | 339.4 | 3.4 | 359.6 | 532.9 | 0.49 |
| KBC-NaClO | 334.1 | 3.2 | 357.6 | 476.9 | 0.66 |
| KBC-H2O2 | 338.3 | 6.7 | 359.4 | 513.2 | 0.00 |
| KBC-H2SO4 | 272.0 | 3.9 | 304.3 | 544.8 | 0.56 |
| KBC-citric | 339.8 | 4.0 | 359.4 | 541.4 | 0.65 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Uşurelu, C.-D.; Oprică, G.-M.; Panaitescu, D.M.; Frone, A.N.; Damian, C.M.; Nicolae, C.A.; Dima, Ş.-O.; Oancea, F.; Teodorescu, M. Isolation of Cellulose Nanofibers from Kombucha Beverage By-Product by Chemo-Mechanical Routes. Polymers 2025, 17, 2307. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17172307
Uşurelu C-D, Oprică G-M, Panaitescu DM, Frone AN, Damian CM, Nicolae CA, Dima Ş-O, Oancea F, Teodorescu M. Isolation of Cellulose Nanofibers from Kombucha Beverage By-Product by Chemo-Mechanical Routes. Polymers. 2025; 17(17):2307. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17172307
Chicago/Turabian StyleUşurelu, Cătălina-Diana, Gabriela-Mădălina Oprică, Denis Mihaela Panaitescu, Adriana Nicoleta Frone, Celina Maria Damian, Cristian Andi Nicolae, Ştefan-Ovidiu Dima, Florin Oancea, and Mircea Teodorescu. 2025. "Isolation of Cellulose Nanofibers from Kombucha Beverage By-Product by Chemo-Mechanical Routes" Polymers 17, no. 17: 2307. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17172307
APA StyleUşurelu, C.-D., Oprică, G.-M., Panaitescu, D. M., Frone, A. N., Damian, C. M., Nicolae, C. A., Dima, Ş.-O., Oancea, F., & Teodorescu, M. (2025). Isolation of Cellulose Nanofibers from Kombucha Beverage By-Product by Chemo-Mechanical Routes. Polymers, 17(17), 2307. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17172307

