Synthesis of Vinyl-Containing Polydimethylsiloxane in An Active Medium

This research deals with the synthesis of copoly(methylvinyl)(dimethyl)siloxanes by the copolycondensation of dimethyldiethoxy- and methylvinyldimethoxysilane in an active medium, followed by thermal condensation in a vacuum. We achieved a range of copolymers exhibiting finely tuned molecular weights spanning between 1500 and 20,000 with regulated functional methylvinylsiloxane units. Analysis of the microstructure showed that the copolymerization predominantly formed products demonstrating a random distribution of units (R~1). However, an increase in the content of vinyl-containing monomers increases the R parameter, indicating an enhanced tendency towards alternating linkages within the copolymer matrix.

The main industrial method for obtaining vinyl-containing PDMS involves the hydrolytic polycondensation of dimethyl-and methylvinyldichlorosilanes followed by the catalytic rearrangement of the hydrolysis product [32].However, this method presents complexities in controlling product composition, generates hydrochloric acid waste, and requires additional purification stages, including the stage of purification of the target copolymer from the equilibrium amount of cyclosiloxanes (10-15%) formed during the second stage.An alternative method for the preparation of vinyl-containing siloxanes is the ring-opening equilibrium copolymerization of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane and 1,3,5,7-tetramethyl, 1,3,5,7-tetravinylcyclotetrasiloxane [33].This method makes it possible to obtain copolymers with specified molecular weight characteristics and the content of vinyl groups, but it is also characterized by the presence of a stage of purification of the polymer from cycles formed as a result of the process equilibrium.Considering the fact that the initial monomers for polymerization-cyclosiloxanes-are also obtained by the polycondensation of functional silanes, it seems a promising task to develop polycondensation approaches to vinyl-containing PDMS synthesis that do not contain cyclic impurities, allowing for the control of the content of vinyl groups and molecular weight characteristics and not requiring equilibration processes.
One of the modern eco-friendly polycondensation methods for the production of polyorganosiloxanes with a given composition and structure is polycondensation in an active medium-an excess of anhydrous acetic acid [32].In this case, acetic acid is simultaneously a reagent, a catalyst, and a solvent.Unlike the classical catalytic hydrolytic polycondensation of alkoxysilanes, this cascade process occurs in a homogeneous environment, does not require the use of water, since it is generated at one of the stages, and allows the production of polymers of a given composition and structure.Previous studies have shown the possibility of linear dimethyl-, methylphenyl-and methylbenzylsiloxane homopolymers selectively obtained using this method without an additional stage of catalytic rearrangement.This fact makes it promising to expand this approach to linear copolymers, including vinyl-containing PDMS [34][35][36][37].
The purpose of this work was to study the possibilities of the copolycondensation of methylvinyl-and dimethylalkoxysilanes in an active medium to obtain α,ω-dihydroxypoly (methylvinyl)(dimethyl)siloxanes with a controlled molecular weight and content of vinyl groups.
All reagents were purified using standard methods [38].Before the synthesis, dimethyldiethoxysilane and methylvinyldimethoxysilane were distilled.Acetic acid was dried over P 2 O 5 , distilled, and kept in an inert atmosphere.Pyridine was dried over BaO, distilled, and kept under 3 Å molecular sieves.

Characterization
1 H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded at room temperature on a Bruker WP 250 SY spectrometer (250.13MHz) for all samples. 29Si NMR spectra were recorded at room temperature on a Bruker Avance II 300 (59.64 MHz) to analyze the microstructure of copolymers.The spectra were processed in MestReNova software (v.12.0).Chemical shifts (δ) in ppm were calibrated to residual solvent peaks (CDCl 3 : δ = 7.25 ppm).
IR spectra were recorded on an IR Fourier spectrometer-Nicolet iS50 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)-in the ATR mode with 32 scans for each wave number in the range of 1000-4000 cm −1 .
Gel permeation chromatograms (GPCs) were recorded using a GPC system, consisting of high-pressure pump Stayer Series II (Akvilon, Podolsk, Russia), refractometric detector RIDK 102 (Laboratory Instruments Prague, Prague, Czech Republic), and column ther-  C, toluene was used as the eluent, with a flow rate 1 mL/min.Analytical separation was performed using a 7.8 mm × 300 mm Phenomenex column (Spectralab Scientific Inc., Torrance, MA, USA) filled with Phenogel sorbent with a pore size from 500 Å to 10 4 Å.Molecular masses were determined using polystyrene standards.

Synthesis of PDMS-50-Vin (MeVin/Me 2 = 1/1) by Slow Injection
Half of the acetic acid (14.3 mL, 0.25 mol) was added to a 100 mL three-neck roundbottom flask.Then, dimethyldiethoxysilane (3.7 g, 0.025 mol) and methylvinyldimethoxysilane (3.3 g, 0.025 mol) in the second half of the acetic acid (14.3 mL, 0.25 mol) were added into the system in a controlled manner using a dosing syringe pump at a rate of 0.1 mL/min.Then, the reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h at 118 • C until complete alkoxy groups conversion (time after full addition of components).The product was washed with toluene to a neutral pH of the aqueous layer and kept for 12 h above anhydrous sodium sulfate; then, the solvent was distilled off to give 4.1 g of the product (yield 93%). 1 H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ, ppm: 6.40-5.55(m, 3H), 0.13 (dddd, J = 17.3, 7.4, 5.5, 2.2 Hz, 9H).Molecular weight characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Synthesis of PDMS-75-Vin (MeVin/Me 2 = 3/1) by Slow Injection
Half of the acetic acid (14.3 mL, 0.25 mol) was added to a 100 mL three-neck roundbottom flask.Then, dimethyldiethoxysilane (1.75 g, 0.012 mol) and methylvinyldimethoxysilane (5.25 g, 0.040 mol) in the second half of the acetic acid (14.3 mL, 0.25 mol) were added into the system in a controlled manner using a dosing syringe pump at a rate of 0.1 mL/min.Then, the reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h at 118 • C until complete alkoxy groups conversion (time after full addition of components).The product was washed with toluene to a neutral pH of the aqueous layer and kept for 12 h above anhydrous sodium sulfate; then, the solvent was distilled off to give 3.9 g of the product (yield 89%). 1 H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ, ppm: 6.29-5.51(m, 3H), 0.60-−0.39(m, 5H).Molecular weight characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Synthesis of PDMS-25-Vin (MeVin/Me 2 = 1/3) by Slow Injection
Half of the acetic acid (14.3 mL, 0.25 mol) was added to a 100 mL three-neck roundbottom flask.Then, dimethyldiethoxysilane (5.9 g, 0.040 mol) and methylvinyldimethoxysilane (1.35 g, 0.012 mol) in the second half of the acetic acid (14.3 mL, 0.25 mol) were added into the system in a controlled manner using a dosing syringe pump at a rate of 0.1 mL/min.Then, the reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h at 118 • C until complete alkoxy groups conversion (time after full addition of components).The product was washed with toluene to a neutral pH of the aqueous layer and kept for 12 h above anhydrous sodium sulfate; then, the solvent was distilled off to give 4.4 g of the product (yield 90%). 1 H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ, ppm: 6.33-5.46(m, 3H), 0.68-−0.36(m, 21H).Molecular weight characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Synthesis of PDMS-100-Vin (MeVin/Me 2 = 1/0) by Slow Injection
Half of the acetic acid (16.3 mL, 0.28 mol) was added to a 100 mL three-neck roundbottom flask.Then, methylvinyldimethoxysilane (7.5 g, 0.057 mol) in the second half of the acetic acid (16.3 mL, 0.28 mol) was added into the system in a controlled manner using a dosing syringe pump at a rate of 0.1 mL/min.The reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h at 118 • C.Then, the reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h at 118 • C until complete alkoxy groups conversion (time after full addition of components).The product was washed with toluene to a neutral pH of the aqueous layer and kept for 12 h above anhydrous sodium sulfate; then, the solvent was distilled off to give 5.4 g of the product (yield 91%). 1 H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ, ppm: 6.30-5.61(m, 3H), 0.51-−0.29 (m, 3H).Molecular weight characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Blocking of Condensation Products
A 10 wt.% solution of PDMS-X-Vin oligomer (1.0 g, 0.01 mol) in toluene, chlorotrimethylsilane (2.67 g, 0.025 mol), and pyridine (1.93 g, 0.025 mol) was added to a 20 mL roundbottom flask.The reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h.The product was washed to a neutral pH of the aqueous layer and kept for 12 h above anhydrous sodium sulfate; then, the solvent was distilled off. 1 H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ, ppm: 6.23-5.58(m, 1H), 0.47-−0.26(m, 3H).IR 2954 cm −1 ν as (CH 3 -), 2921 cm −1 ν as (-CH 2 -), 1465 cm −1 ν um (-CH 2 -), and 1259 cm −1 ν (Si-CH 3 ).GC-MS (EI, 70 eV) spectrum of the low-molecularweight fraction of the blocked product: 293.15  Half of the acetic acid (103 mL, 1.8 mol) was added to a 500 mL three-neck roundbottom flask.Then, dimethyldiethoxysilane (26.7 g, 0.18 mol) and methylvinyldimethoxysilane (23.8 g, 0.18 mol) in the second half of the acetic acid (103 mL, 1.8 mol) were added into the system in a controlled manner using a dropping funnel at a rate of 0.3 mL/min.The reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h at 118 • C. The product was washed with MTBE to a neutral pH of the aqueous layer and kept for 12 h above anhydrous sodium sulfate; then, the solvent was distilled off. 1 H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ, ppm 6.49-5.42(m, 3H), 0.55-−0.39(m, 9H).Mp = 1200, Mn = 950, Mw = 1300, and PDI = 1.4 by GPC.The impact of rate on the composition of cyclic and linear products are shown in Table 2. Half of the acetic acid (103 mL, 1.8 mol) was added to a 500 mL three-neck roundbottom flask.Then, dimethyldiethoxysilane (15.4 g, 0.09 mol) and methylvinyldimethoxysilane (40.4 g, 0.27 mol) in the second half of the acetic acid (103 mL, 1.8 mol) were added into the system in a controlled manner using a dropping funnel at a rate of 0.3 mL/min.The reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h at 118 • C. The product was washed with MTBE to a neutral pH of the aqueous layer and kept for 12 h above anhydrous sodium sulfate; then, the solvent was distilled off. 1 H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ, ppm: 6.46-5.36(m, 3H), 0.13 (dtd, J = 16.7,5.9, 3.0 Hz, 5H).Mp = 1000, Mn = 850, Mw = 1100, and PDI = 1.3 by GPC.The impact of rate on the composition of cyclic and linear products are shown in Table 2. Half of the acetic acid (103 mL, 1.8 mol) was added to a 500 mL three-neck roundbottom flask.Then, dimethyldiethoxysilane (46.3 g, 0.27 mol) and methylvinyldimethoxysilane (13.5 g, 0.09 mol) in the second half of the acetic acid (103 mL, 1.8 mol) were added into the system in a controlled manner using a dropping funnel at a rate of 0.3 mL/min.The reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h at 118 • C. The product was washed with MTBE to a neutral pH of the aqueous layer and kept for 12 h above anhydrous sodium sulfate; then, the solvent was distilled off. 1 H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ, ppm: 6.35-5.53(m, 3H), 0.57-−0.28(m, 21H).Mp = 1050, Mn = 900, Mw = 1200, and PDI = 1.3 by GPC.The impact of rate on the composition of cyclic and linear products are shown in Table 2.
At R > 1, polymer has a tendency toward the alternation of units, and at R = 2, it is an entirely alternating copolymer.At R < 1, polymer has a block structure, and at R = 0, it is completely a block copolymer or a mixture of two homopolymers.The value R = 1 indicates a random distribution of units in the copolymer.

Copolycondensation of Dimethyldiethoxysilane and Methylvinyldimethoxysilane in Active Medium
Commercially available methylvinyldimethoxy-MeVinSi(OMe) 2 and dimethyldiethoxysilane Me 2 Si(OEt) 2 served as initial reagents to synthesize vinyl-containing polydimethylsiloxanes.Previous research has shown that the polycondensation process of alkoxysilanes in an active medium proceeds through a series of steps: the acidolysis of alkoxy groups, esterification involving free alcohol and acetic acid, the hydrolysis of acetoxy derivative from acidolysis with water, and the heterofunctional polycondensation of acetoxy-and hydroxy-derivatives, leading to the siloxane bond formation.Since the siloxane bond formation involves acetoxysilane rather than alkoxysilane, the type of alkoxy group does not impact the composition of the resulting product [34].
Experiments conducted with Me 2 Si(OEt) 2 have previously highlighted the pivotal influence of the reagent introduction method on the prevalent formation of linear or cyclic products [35].Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the influence of reagent addition order on the composition of the resulting products and molecular weights across various molar ratios of Me 2 Si(OEt) 2 and MeVinSi(OMe) 2 (0/100, 25/75, 50/50, 75/25).The general scheme of its copolycondensation in an excess of anhydrous acetic acid is presented in Figure 1.
toxy derivative from acidolysis with water, and the heterofunctional polycondensation of acetoxy-and hydroxy-derivatives, leading to the siloxane bond formation.Since the siloxane bond formation involves acetoxysilane rather than alkoxysilane, the type of alkoxy group does not impact the composition of the resulting product [34].
Experiments conducted with Me2Si(OEt)2 have previously highlighted the pivotal influence of the reagent introduction method on the prevalent formation of linear or cyclic products [35].Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the influence of reagent addition order on the composition of the resulting products and molecular weights across various molar ratios of Me2Si(OEt)2 and MeVinSi(OMe)2 (0/100, 25/75, 50/50, 75/25).The general scheme of its copolycondensation in an excess of anhydrous acetic acid is presented in Figure 1.The process was monitored using 1 H NMR spectroscopy with the disappearance of the proton signals of the alkoxy groups.Figure 2 shows the 1 H NMR spectra of the dimethyldiethoxy-and methylvinyldimethoxysilane copolycondensation products in a molar ratio of 75/25 (PDMS-25-Vin) after 2 and 8 h (Figure 2 (1) and ( 2), respectively).The signals between δ = 0.10 and δ = 0.37 ppm are assigned to the methyl groups, and the signals in the range of 5.77-6.07ppm are attributed to the vinyl groups.The disappearance of the The process was monitored using 1 H NMR spectroscopy with the disappearance of the proton signals of the alkoxy groups.Figure 2 shows the 1 H NMR spectra of the dimethyldiethoxy-and methylvinyldimethoxysilane copolycondensation products in a molar ratio of 75/25 (PDMS-25-Vin) after 2 and 8 h (Figure 2 (1) and ( 2), respectively).The signals between δ = 0.10 and δ = 0.37 ppm are assigned to the methyl groups, and the signals in the range of 5.77-6.07ppm are attributed to the vinyl groups.The disappearance of the methoxy group at 3.5 ppm of MeVinSi(OMe) 2 and the ethoxy group at 3.7 ppm (CH 3 -) and 1.2 ppm (-CH 2 -) of Me 2 Si(OEt) 2 clearly indicate the reaction's completion.At the reaction temperature of 120 • C, the alkoxy groups were fully converted within 6-8 h (Table 1).
Polymers 2024, 16, x 7 of 18 methoxy group at 3.5 ppm of MeVinSi(OMe)2 and the ethoxy group at 3.7 ppm (CH3-) and 1.2 ppm (-CH2-) of Me2Si(OEt)2 clearly indicate the reaction's completion.At the reaction temperature of 120 °C, the alkoxy groups were fully converted within 6-8 h (Table 1).To stabilize the composition and prevent further condensation of the hydroxyl groups, the siloxane products were blocked with trimethyl chlorosilane, as described in [32] (Figure 3).To stabilize the composition and prevent further condensation of the hydroxyl groups, the siloxane products were blocked with trimethyl chlorosilane, as described in [32] (Figure 3).The efficiency of blocking was assessed by the absence of the absorption band at 3500 cm −1 on the IR spectrum of the product after blocking.IR spectra of the copolycondensation products derived from Me2Si(OEt)2 and MeVinSi(OMe)2 are presented in Figure S1 (see the Supplementary Materials).
Following trimethylsilylation, the product was distilled, and the volatile components were analyzed via GLC and GC-MS to determine the composition (Figure S2, Table S1).Non-volatile components were evaluated using GPCs to assess the molecular weights of the linear products (Figure 4).Additionally, 1 H NMR spectroscopy was used to determine the ratio of methylvinyl-and dimethylsiloxane units in the oligomers, as well as to determine the content of hydroxyl groups (Figure 5).The hydrolysis conditions, an overview of the chemical composition of copolymers, and the number of OH groups, as well as the molecular weight and its distribution obtained through GPC measurements, are summarized in Table 1.The efficiency of blocking was assessed by the absence of the absorption band at 3500 cm −1 on the IR spectrum of the product after blocking.IR spectra of the copolycondensation products derived from Me 2 Si(OEt) 2 and MeVinSi(OMe) 2 are presented in Figure S1 (see the Supplementary Materials).
Following trimethylsilylation, the product was distilled, and the volatile components were analyzed via GLC and GC-MS to determine the composition (Figure S2, Table S1).Non-volatile components were evaluated using GPCs to assess the molecular weights of the linear products (Figure 4).Additionally, 1 H NMR spectroscopy was used to determine the ratio of methylvinyl-and dimethylsiloxane units in the oligomers, as well as to determine the content of hydroxyl groups (Figure 5).The hydrolysis conditions, an overview of the chemical composition of copolymers, and the number of OH groups, as well as the molecular weight and its distribution obtained through GPC measurements, are summarized in Table 1.To stabilize the composition and prevent further condensation of the hydroxyl groups, the siloxane products were blocked with trimethyl chlorosilane, as described in [32] (Figure 3).The efficiency of blocking was assessed by the absence of the absorption band at 3500 cm −1 on the IR spectrum of the product after blocking.IR spectra of the copolycondensation products derived from Me2Si(OEt)2 and MeVinSi(OMe)2 are presented in Figure S1 (see the Supplementary Materials).
Following trimethylsilylation, the product was distilled, and the volatile components were analyzed via GLC and GC-MS to determine the composition (Figure S2, Table S1).Non-volatile components were evaluated using GPCs to assess the molecular weights of the linear products (Figure 4).Additionally, 1 H NMR spectroscopy was used to determine the ratio of methylvinyl-and dimethylsiloxane units in the oligomers, as well as to determine the content of hydroxyl groups (Figure 5).The hydrolysis conditions, an overview of the chemical composition of copolymers, and the number of OH groups, as well as the molecular weight and its distribution obtained through GPC measurements, are summarized in Table 1.The identification of volatile products using GLC was difficult because of the presence of a wide array of cyclosiloxanes with varying compositions that have similar boiling points.As a result, the latter are poorly separated during the chromatography (see Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials).This problem was solved using the GC-MS method.The identification of volatile products using GLC was difficult because of the presence of a wide array of cyclosiloxanes with varying compositions that have similar boiling points.As a result, the latter are poorly separated during the chromatography (see Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials).This problem was solved using the GC-MS method.Figure S3 (see Figure S3 in Supplementary Materials) exemplifies the GC-MS spectrum of the volatile condensation products.The composition of the volatile components determined using GC-MS is given in Table S1.These volatile products consist primarily of cyclic oligomers, predominantly in a copolymer composition with 3-7 siloxane units.The formation of homocyclic compounds reached up to 25% of the total number of cycles observed with a non-stoichiometric ratio of monomers (Table S2 № 2, 4, 6, 8), while with stoichiometric ratios of monomers, homocycles comprise less than 5% of the total volatile products (Table S2, № 3, 7).The correlation between dimethyl-and methylvinyl units in mixed-structure cycles coincides with the monomer ratio, even in cases with non-stoichiometric ratios, resulting in mixed cycles enriched with an excess of specific monomer units.Moreover, the ratio of dimethyl-and methylvinyl units in cycles of mixed structure correlates with the ratio of monomers.For instance, in a 25/75 monomer ratio, cycles and D 3 V 2 constitute 68% of the total volatile products, while 25% represent a mixture from D 3 to D 7 , and 7% are mixed cycles enriched in methylvinyl units.Similarly, with a 75/25 monomer ratio, cycles D 1 V 2 , D 2 V 2 , D 1 V 3 , and D 2 V 3 make up 69% of the total volatile products, with 28.5% comprising a mixture from V 3 to V 7 , and 2.5% are mixed cycles enriched in dimethyl units.
The composition of non-volatile products, regardless of polycondensation conditions, corresponded to the calculated monomer ratio.This was determined by the ratio of the integral intensities of protons of methyl and vinyl groups in the regions 0.10-0.37ppm and 5.77-6.07ppm, respectively, for vacuumed unblocked product (Table 1).
Figure 4 shows the GPC curves of non-volatile products.According to the data given in Table 1, all non-volatile products are characterized by a narrow molecular weight distribution, M w /M n is 1.3-1.4,and a low molecular weight value between 1300 and 900.
Analysis of the data in Table 1 indicates that, akin to the polycondensation of Me 2 Si(OEt) 2 in an active medium [35], the sequence of reagent addition influences the ratio of cyclic and linear products.In the case of the polycondensation of MeVinSi(OMe) 2 under simultaneous mixing conditions, a larger number of linear oligomers are formed compared to Me 2 Si(OEt) 2 -58% and 45%, respectively (Table 1 № 1, 5).Shifting to slow injection of the monomer into the reaction mixture increased the yield of linear oligomethylvinylsiloxanes to 73% (Table 1 № 6).A similar trend was observed for all variants of Me 2 Si(OEt) 2 and MeVinSi(OMe) 2 mixtures.The order of reagent introduction does not significantly alter the composition of copolymer cyclic and linear siloxanes; however, it slightly impacts the size and molecular weight of oligomers.Oligomers obtained by slow injection are characterized by a higher molecular weight of 1400-1700 compared to 1150-1000 in the case of simultaneous mixing (Table 1 № 1-4, 6-9).This can be explained by the higher contribution of the heterofunctional condensation of acetoxy-and hydroxy-derivatives of monomers in forming the siloxane bond in the case of slow injection.However, this effect is evident only for a slow introduction rate of 0.1 mL/min.An increase to 0.3 mL/min diminishes this effect, leading to a ratio of cyclic and linear products similar to those obtained under simultaneous mixing (Table 2).
Thus, the use of the slow injection of monomers has prospects only for small quantities, whereas for scaling up operations, simultaneous mixing proves to be more advantageous.
In summary, the copolycondensation of Me 2 Si(OEt) 2 and MeVinSi(OMe) 2 in an active medium demonstrates the potential for obtaining α,ω-dihydroxyoligo(methylvinyl)(dimethyl)siloxanes with a targeted unit ratio, with yields between 60 and 80% contingent on the reaction conditions.

Enhancing the Molecular Weight of Oligodimethylmethylvinylsiloxanes
The polycondensation of bifunctional alkoxysilanes in an active medium leads to the formation of low-molecular-weight oligomeric products, as reported in [32].However, the elevation of their molecular weight can be achieved through subsequent thermal condensation (Figure 6).It is possible to increase the molecular weight of dimethylsiloxane oligomers up to 70,000 via thermal condensation at 50-150 °C/1 mmHg.For oligomers containing phenyl and benzyl substituents at the silicon atom, this effect requires the presence of a catalystpotassium acetate.Its utilization increases the molecular weight without depolymerization processes [36,37], commonly observed when strong acids and alkalis are used.The approach to enhance the molecular weight of the oligosiloxanes in this study replicated the above-mentioned methods.Sequential exposure for 5 h at temperatures of 50, 100, and 150 °C in vacuum was used for samples after the simultaneous mixing method.The monitoring of the process involved tracking changes in the molecular weight and cyclic product content using the GPCs.
For PDMS-100-Vin, raising the temperature to 50 °C led to a moderate increase in MW from 1100 to 4200 (Table 3, Figure 7 (1)).It is possible to increase the molecular weight of dimethylsiloxane oligomers up to 70,000 via thermal condensation at 50-150 • C/1 mmHg.For oligomers containing phenyl and benzyl substituents at the silicon atom, this effect requires the presence of a catalyst-potassium acetate.Its utilization increases the molecular weight without depolymerization processes [36,37], commonly observed when strong acids and alkalis are used.The approach to enhance the molecular weight of the oligosiloxanes in this study replicated the above-mentioned methods.Sequential exposure for 5 h at temperatures of 50, 100, and 150 • C in vacuum was used for samples after the simultaneous mixing method.The monitoring of the process involved tracking changes in the molecular weight and cyclic product content using the GPCs.
For PDMS-100-Vin, raising the temperature to 50 • C led to a moderate increase in M W from 1100 to 4200 (Table 3, Figure 7 (1)).
Polymers 2024, 16, x 12 of 18 Figure 7. GPC curves of the products after thermal condensation in vacuum, where (1) GPC curves using Phenomenex column with a pore size 500 Å and (2) GPC curves using Phenomenex column with a pore size 10 4 Å.The labels 1-6 correspond to the numbers in the Table 3.
Further elevation of the temperature up to 150 °C did not affect the molecular mass.Despite the temperature, the ratio of methyl and vinyl units determined by 1 H NMR spectroscopy matched the calculated values.This stability suggests the resilience of thermally labile vinyl groups under the examined conditions (Figure 8).However, introducing AcOK into the system after extended heat treatment induced gel formation. (2) . GPC curves of the products after thermal condensation in vacuum, where (1) GPC curves using Phenomenex column with a pore size 500 Å and (2) GPC curves using Phenomenex column with a pore size 10 4 Å.The labels 1-6 correspond to the numbers in the Table 3.
Further elevation of the temperature up to 150 • C did not affect the molecular mass.Despite the temperature, the ratio of methyl and vinyl units determined by 1 H NMR spectroscopy matched the calculated values.This stability suggests the resilience of thermally labile vinyl groups under the examined conditions (Figure 8).However, introducing AcOK into the system after extended heat treatment induced gel formation.
. GPC curves of the products after thermal condensation in vacuum, where (1) GPC curves using Phenomenex column with a pore size 500 Å and (2) GPC curves using Phenomenex column with a pore size 10 4 Å.The labels 1-6 correspond to the numbers in the Table 3.
Further elevation of the temperature up to 150 °C did not affect the molecular mass.Despite the temperature, the ratio of methyl and vinyl units determined by 1 H NMR spectroscopy matched the calculated values.This stability suggests the resilience of thermally labile vinyl groups under the examined conditions (Figure 8).However, introducing AcOK into the system after extended heat treatment induced gel formation.3.
Meanwhile, the thermal condensation of PDMS-100-Vin in the presence of AcOK immediately after the polycondensation of MeVinSi(OMe) 2 allows for an increase in the MM to 29,000 after 5 h (Table 3 № 5, Figure 7 (2)).The subsequent isolation and heat treatment of the product in the presence of fresh AcOK boosted up the molecular weight to 124,000 (Table 3, № 6, Figure 7 (2)) with the complete preservation of vinyl groups.Notably, during the thermal condensation, low-molecular-weight compounds were distilled, and the copolymers generated under such conditions were devoid of cyclic products.
We also studied the thermal condensation process of oligomers with a different ratio of dimethyl-and methylvinylsiloxyl compounds derived from the copolycondensation of Me 2 Si(OEt) 2 and MeVinSi(OMe) 2 in an active medium.The results are outlined in Table 4.
Unlike oligomethylvinylsiloxane oligomers, the introduction of dimethyl units significantly increases the MM of copolymers even at 50 • C-the observed values of the MM for oligomers escalated from 1500 to 8000 (Table 4 № 1), reaching up to 20,000 with subsequent temperature elevation to 100-150 • C (Table 4 № 2, 3).
Using AcOK as a catalyst for the thermal condensation of cooligomers at 150 • C yielded similar molecular weights (ca.20,000) only within 5 h (Table 4 № 4).According to the 1 H NMR spectroscopy data, the ratio of dimethylsiloxy and methylvinylsiloxy links remained constant for all oligomers and over the entire range of thermal condensation conditions.Thus, it was shown that the copolycondensation of dimethyl and methyl vinyl dialkoxysilanes in an active medium makes it possible to obtain vinyl-containing dimethylsiloxane oligomers and polymers with controlled content of vinyl group condensation and molecular weight characteristics.It is possible to implement the second stage without cyclization: -Only in the presence of a catalyst for the condensation of silanol groups-AcOK in the case of methylvinylsiloxane oligomers PDMS-100-Vin; -Both in the presence of a catalyst and without it in the of case oligomers with a mixed composition.Simultaneously with postcondensation, the cycles formed at the first stage of polycondensation in the active medium are distilled off, which makes it possible to obtain a final polymer that does not contain low-molecular-weight cyclic impurities (according to GPCs).
It should be noted that this division of the process into two stages is quite arbitrary, and it is possible to implement the entire two-stage process in one-pot mode, which significantly distinguishes it from traditional approaches based on the catalytic hydrolytic polycondensation of functional silanes, accompanied by intermediate stages of neutralization, filtration, and washing of product and the stage of purifying the final polymer from cycles.

The Study of Polymer Microstructure
To study the microstructure of copolymers, a series of samples was synthesized.A series of copolymers with comparable molecular weights was obtained by the copolycondensation of Me 2 Si(OEt) 2 and MeVinSi(OMe) 2 in an active medium followed by thermal condensation at 150 • C at 1 mmHg (Table 5, Figure 9).Synthesized vinyl functional PDMSs are characterized by a monomodal molecular weight distribution and a polydispersity coefficient ranging from 1.5 to 1.9.mers 2024, 16, x 14 of

The Study of Polymer Microstructure
To study the microstructure of copolymers, a series of samples was synthesized series of copolymers with comparable molecular weights was obtained by the copolyco densation of Me2Si(OEt)2 and MeVinSi(OMe)2 in an active medium followed by therm condensation at 150 °C at 1 mmHg (Table 5, Figure 9).Synthesized vinyl functional PDM are characterized by a monomodal molecular weight distribution and a polydispers coefficient ranging from 1.5 to 1.9.  5. Their microstructure was examined with 29 Si NMR spectroscopy, and the signals structural fragments were interpreted at the triad sequence level (Figure 10) [39].Figu 10 shows the 29 Si NMR spectra for PDMS-75-Vin, PDMS-50-Vin, and PDMS-25-Vin cop ymers.In the 29 Si NMR spectra of the obtained copolymers, signals are observed in t range from −34.9 to -36.0 ppm, corresponding to the V-units, and in the range from -2 to -22.1 ppm, belonging to the D-units of the obtained copolymer.The correlation of tria was carried out on the basis of data from the work [40].In Table 6, all the studied copo mers are characterized by the presence of six types of triads, VDV, VDD, DDD, VV DVD, and VVV, where D = Me2SiO and V = MeVinSiO.5.
Their microstructure was examined with 29 Si NMR spectroscopy, and the signals of structural fragments were interpreted at the triad sequence level (Figure 10) [39].Figure 10 shows the 29 Si NMR spectra for PDMS-75-Vin, PDMS-50-Vin, and PDMS-25-Vin copolymers.In the 29 Si NMR spectra of the obtained copolymers, signals are observed in the range from −34.9 to -36.0 ppm, corresponding to the V-units, and in the range from -20.7 to --22.1 ppm, belonging to the D-units of the obtained copolymer.The correlation of triads was carried out on the basis of data from the work [40].In Table 6, all the studied copolymers are characterized by the presence of six types of triads, VDV, VDD, DDD, VVD, DVD, and VVV, where D = Me 2 SiO and V = MeVinSiO.
In the PDMS-25-Vin copolymer, the mole fraction of block V-centered VVV triads is only 1%, and as the content of methyl vinylsiloxane units increases, this fraction increases, and in the PDMS-50-Vin and PDMS-75-Vin copolymers, it is 7 and 26%, respectively.The PDMS-25-Vin synthesized in this work has a statistical distribution of units (R~1), while the copolymers PDMS-50-Vin and PDMS-75-Vin show a slight tendency to alternate (R~1.2) (Table 6).  5. Figure 10. 29Si NMR spectrum of the copolymers.The labels (1)-( 3) correspond to the numbers in the Table 5.
Chemical shift δ H , ppm

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. GPC curve of the blocked product.The labels 7, 8, 9 correspond to the numbers in the Table1.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. GPC curve of the blocked product.The labels 7, 8, 9 correspond to the numbers in the Table1.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Scheme of thermal condensation in vacuum.

Figure 8 . 1 HFigure 8 . 1 H
Figure 8.1 H NMR spectra of the products after thermal condensation in vacuum.The labels 1-6 correspond to the numbers in the Table3.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. GPC curves of PDMS-X-Vin after thermal condensation.The labels 1-3 correspond to t numbers in the Table5.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. GPC curves of PDMS-X-Vin after thermal condensation.The labels 1-3 correspond to the numbers in the Table5.

Table 2 .
The impact of reagent mixing methods on the composition of cyclic and linear products.

Table 3 .
Conditions and characteristics of homopolymer obtained by thermal condensation in vacuum.

Table 4 .
Conditions and characteristics of copolymers obtained by thermal condensation in vacuum.

Table 5 .
Molecular weight characteristics of PDMS-X-Vin.

Table 1 .
GPC curve of the blocked product.The labels 7, 8, 9 correspond to the numbers in the Table1.

Table 3 .
Conditions and characteristics of homopolymer obtained by thermal condensation in vacuum.

Table 5 .
Molecular weight characteristics of PDMS-X-Vin.