Preparation of Organic-Inorganic Phosphorus-Nitrogen-Based Flame Retardants and Their Application to Plywood

The combustibility of wood can be improved by physical and chemical means, thus expanding the use of wood products. In this study, two novel phosphorus-nitrogen flame retardants (UCPR and MCPR) were developed, and the intercalated modified layered double hydroxides (LDH) thereof were designated as UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH. By impregnating poplar veneer with UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH solutions, the study investigated the effects of different concentrations (1%, 5%, 10%), processes (vacuum-pressure impregnation, room temperature impregnation, normal-pressure impregnation), and impregnation times (2 h, 3 h, 24 h, 48 h) on the weight-gain rate of veneer. The optimal process was then selected for preparing formaldehyde-free three-layer plywood. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) were used to characterize the UCPR and MCPR. Meanwhile, gel-permeation chromatography (GPC) demonstrated that the molecular weight of the synthesized flame retardants increased as their molecular distribution became more uniform. The impregnation process was performed at normal temperature and pressure for 48 h at a 5% flame retardant concentration. Results from cone calorimetry indicate that the UCPR-LDH plywood exhibits a peak heat release rate that is 30.43% lower than that of the control group, demonstrating superior thermal barrier performance. The smoke emission of the MCPR-LDH plywood was reduced by 33.62% compared to the control group, indicating superior smoke suppression performance. This method presents a viable approach for synthesizing organic-inorganic flame retardants.


Introduction
Fire is one of the most common disasters and poses a great threat to people's lives, property, and public safety [1,2]. Most of the polymers that we come into contact with in our lives, such as wood, polyurethane, plastic, etc., are combustible [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Wood, one of the world's most commonly used raw materials, not only has naturally beautiful grain and color, but is renewable, easy to process, plays the role of regulating the temperature and humidity environment, and provides a comfortable sensory experience when used in furniture and building materials [9][10][11][12]. Therefore, wood is widely employed in the construction, manufacturing, packaging, decorative, and transportation industries [13,14]. However, wood is a complex porous natural organic substance made of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, and has inherent flaws such as low strength, flimsiness, high variability, flammability, and susceptibility to mold, which limit its use in specific applications [15,16]. To minimize

Preparation of UCPR and MCPR
The chemical reagents employed in this study were of analytical grade and utilized without any additional purification. In a typical synthesis, CP (40 g) was dissolved in 9.23 g of deionized water to form solution 1. Solution 1 was added dropwise to a three-mouth flask, 1 g of urea was added, and the mixture was heated at 75 • C. When the temperature reached 75 • C, the mixture was subjected to rapid stirring. After reacting for 30 min, another 1 g of urea was added, the reaction was continued for 30 min, and finally the mixture was stirred and reacted for 15 min to fully react the urea. After the reaction was completed, the heat was turned off, and the mixture was subjected to slow stirring to cool it to room temperature and then poured out and stored in a sealed container. The specific process of the synthesis is shown in Table 1, and the possible synthesis schemes are shown in Scheme 1.
The preparation of MCPR was performed using the UCPR preparation method. First, CP (37.67 g) was dissolved in 8.693 g of water while stirring to form solution 2. Then, 0.5 g of melamine was added to a three-mouth flask with 46.363 g of solution 2 and kept at 70 • C for 15 min, and then 0.5 g of melamine was added dropwise while stirring for another 15 min. Finally, melamine was added twice, and allowed to react each time for 15 min. After the reaction was completed, the mixture was cooled to room temperature, taken out, and stored in a sealed container. The specific process of the synthesis is shown in Table 2, and the possible synthesis schemes are shown in Scheme 1. The preparation of MCPR was performed using the UCPR preparation method. First, CP (37.67 g) was dissolved in 8.693 g of water while stirring to form solution 2. Then, 0.5 g of melamine was added to a three-mouth flask with 46.363 g of solution 2 and kept at 70 °C for 15 min, and then 0.5 g of melamine was added dropwise while stirring for another 15 min. Finally, melamine was added twice, and allowed to react each time for 15 min.

Preparation of UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH
A mixture of 7.23 g of MgSO 4 , 10 g of Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 and 50 mL of distilled water was placed in a beaker, stirred until completely dissolved, and recorded as liquid A. A mixture of 7.2 g of sodium hydroxide, 1.91 g anhydrous sodium sulfate, and 50 mL of deionized water was placed in a beaker, stirred until completely dissolved, and recorded as liquid B. Then, 4 g of UCPR or 8 g of MCPR was placed in a three-necked flask, 50 mL of deionized water was added, and the mixture was stirred evenly and heated to 75 • C. The stirring speed was increased, and and equal amounts of liquid A and liquid B were slowly added to the three-mouth flask and stirring was continued for 2 h after drop addition. At the conclusion of the reaction, the reactants were subjected to aging at 75 • C for a duration of 30 min. Following this, they were filtered and washed with distilled water until reaching a pH level of 7. Finally, the resulting products were dried at a temperature of 80 • C in order to obtain white powder UCPR-LDH or MCPR-LDH.

Preparation of Three-Layer Plywood
The poplar veneer was baked to absolute dryness at 60 • C, placed in a 1% sodium hydroxide solution, and drained. To identify the optimal procedure, the poplar veneer was impregnated with various concentrations under vacuum or normal temperature and varying pressure circumstances, and the veneer was dried after impregnation to create an impregnated flame-retardant poplar veneer. The aqueous polymer isocyanate (API) adhesive was prepared as described by Wen et al. [38]. Calcium carbonate, UCPR-LDH, and MCPR-LDH were used as inorganic fillers, corresponding to the control, UCPR-LDH, and MCPR-LDH plywood, respectively. The API adhesive and poplar veneer were assembled into three-layer plywood and hot-pressed with a hot-press temperature of 110 • C, a hotpress time of 3 min, and a hot-press pressure of 1.2 MPa.

Characterization
The samples were dried under vacuum until a constant weight was achieved, ground into a fine powder form, analyzed using an IRAffinity-1S Fourier transform infrared spectrometer with a sample-to-potassium bromide mass ratio of 1:100, and then pressed into tablets for infrared scanning. The selected spectral range was 4000-400 cm −1 with 32 scans and a resolution of 4 cm −1 .
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra 13 C-NMR and 31 P-NMR spectra were recorded in Fourier transform mode on a Bruker Avance III 400 MHz NMR spectrometer. The solvent was D 2 O.
The CP, UCPR, and MCPR samples were vacuum-dried to a constant weight and crushed into powder. The GPC instrument model was PL-GPC 50, the column was PLgel MIXED-B LS, and the liquid mobile phase was N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min and a temperature of 40 • C. The samples were analyzed for molecular weight and dispersion using gel permeation chromatography (GPC).
Poplar veneer samples with dimensions of 100 mm × 100 mm × 1.5 mm were placed in an oven at 60 • C and baked to a constant weight. The dried poplar veneer was soaked in the 1% NaOH solution for 2 h before being drained and placed in LDH suspension, where the concentration was adjusted to 1%, 5%, or 10% for 24 or 48 h at room temperature and pressure. Vacuum-pressure impregnation was used as a comparative process at an LDH suspension concentration of 10%, maintained under vacuum for 30 min, and then pressurized to 1.2 MPa for 2 h or 3 h and dried to constant weight. Comparative testing was used to evaluate the best experimental methods for UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH. During the impregnation process, the weight-gain rate of poplar veneer indicated the adherence and precipitation of flame retardant solution in the veneer. The treated veneer's weight-gain rate (WGR) was estimated using Equation (1): where m 0 is the absolute mass of the sample before immersion, g, and m 1 is the absolute mass of the sample after immersion, g. Samples with dimensions of 100 mm × 100 mm × 1.5 mm were pressed into threelayer plywood. The test was performed in accordance with ISO 5660-1:2015 standards, with a thermal radiation power of 50 kW·m −2 , a temperature of 800 • C, and a test period of 400-600 s, and vertical flame heating of the sample. The following data were recorded during the combustion process: time to ignite (TTI, s), total heat release (THR, MJ/m 2 ), heat release rate (HRR, kW/m 2 ), peak heat release rate (pHRR, kW/m 2 ), peak CO production rate (pCOPR, g/s), peak CO 2 production rate (pCO 2 PR, g/s), mass loss rate (MLR, g/s), mass ratio (MR), total smoke production (TSP, m 2 ), smoke production rate (SPR, m 2 /s) and peak smoke production rate (pSPR, m 2 /s).

FTIR
The infrared spectra of Pyrovatex CP, UCPR, and MCPR are shown in Figure 1. According to the infrared spectra, it can be seen that the reaction of urea or melamine with CP did not change the main structure of the CP molecular chain. The UCPR has antisymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrational peaks of CH 2 at 2954 cm −1 and 2850 cm −1 . The MCPR has antisymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrational peaks of CH 2 at 2984 cm −1 and 2843 cm −1 . The stretching vibration peaks of C=O bonds of UCPR and MCPR are 1670 cm −1 and 1653 cm −1 , respectively. The symmetric variable angle vibration peaks of −CH 2 are 1398 cm −1 and 1395 cm −1 , respectively. The stretching vibration peaks of P=O bonds are 1258 cm −1 and 1241 cm −1 , and the asymmetric stretching vibration peak of P−O−C is 1045 cm −1 [39,40]. The peaks at 817 cm −1 and 678 cm −1 correspond to the −CH 2 in-plane wobble absorption peaks of UCPR and MCPR, respectively. Simultaneously, an enhanced absorption peak of 1137 cm −1 was found, which may be attributable to the stretching vibration peak of the C−N bond after the CP reaction with urea and melamine.   Figure 2a,b shows the 13 C NMR spectral analysis of CP and MCPR. The chemical peak near 177.69 ppm corresponds to the −C=O bond of the amide, and the peak near 71.17 ppm corresponds to the alcohol group in the structure of CP. The chemical peaks near 62.95 ppm are attributed to the −N−C−N-group of the sec-carbon and the chemical peak near 53.34 ppm is attributed to the methoxy group, while the chemical peak near 28.56 ppm may be attributed to the −P−C−C− bond of the secondary carbon and the peak near 19.37 ppm may be attributed to the methyl carbon group. The chemical peak appearing in MCPR at 159.96 ppm is attributed to the methylimine group, indicating that CP reacts with MCPR. Referring to the 31 P NMR spectrum of CP, MCPR also showed characteristic peaks at the same position, indicating the successful synthesis of MCPR (Figure 2c,d).

GPC
As can be seen in Figure 3, the weight-average molecular weight Mw of UCPR is 126 higher than that of CP, and the number-average molecular weight Mn of UCPR is 84 higher than that of CP, which indicates that UCPR is a new phosphorus-nitrogen flame retardant generated by the reaction of CP and urea. The molecular weight distribution index Mw/Mn of UCPR increased less than that of CP, indicating that the synthesized polymer still has a relatively uniform molecular weight. At the same time, the weightaverage molecular weight (Mw) of MCPR is 437 higher than CP, and the number-average molecular weight (Mn) of MCPR is 200 higher than CP, which indicates that MCPR is the reaction of CP and melamine to form a new phosphorus-nitrogen flame retardant. The molecular weight distribution index Mw/Mn of MCPR increased more relative to CP, indicating that the molecular weight distribution of the synthesized MCPR was wider and the degree of polydispersity increased.

GPC
As can be seen in Figure 3, the weight-average molecular weight Mw of UCPR is 126 higher than that of CP, and the number-average molecular weight Mn of UCPR is 84 higher than that of CP, which indicates that UCPR is a new phosphorus-nitrogen flame retardant generated by the reaction of CP and urea. The molecular weight distribution index Mw/Mn of UCPR increased less than that of CP, indicating that the synthesized polymer still has a relatively uniform molecular weight. At the same time, the weightaverage molecular weight (Mw) of MCPR is 437 higher than CP, and the number-average molecular weight (Mn) of MCPR is 200 higher than CP, which indicates that MCPR is the reaction of CP and melamine to form a new phosphorus-nitrogen flame retardant. The molecular weight distribution index Mw/Mn of MCPR increased more relative to CP, indicating that the molecular weight distribution of the synthesized MCPR was wider and the degree of polydispersity increased.

Weigh Gain Rate
The concentration of the flame retardant suspension, the duration, and the impregnation process all influence the weight-gain rate of poplar veneer. The weight-gain rate of veneer specimens before and after impregnation was used to establish the optimal concentration and timing of impregnation. From the analysis of Figure 4, it can be seen that the differences in impregnation time and impregnating solution concentration have a greater impact on the weight gain of the specimens. The weight-gain rate of the veneer improved dramatically when vacuum-pressured impregnation at the same concentration was increased from 2 h to 3 h, but the process was more tedious. The increase of impregnation time from 24 h to 48 h at room temperature and pressure had a greater effect on the weight-gain rate, and the change of concentration from 5% to 10% had little effect on the weight-gain rate. Overall, when the poplar veneer specimens were impregnated for 48 h, the concentration of 5% flame retardant suspension was the better process, and the average impregnation weight-gain rates of LDH, UCPR-LDH, and MCPR-LDH poplar ve-

Weigh Gain Rate
The concentration of the flame retardant suspension, the duration, and the impregnation process all influence the weight-gain rate of poplar veneer. The weight-gain rate of veneer specimens before and after impregnation was used to establish the optimal concentration and timing of impregnation. From the analysis of Figure 4, it can be seen that the differences in impregnation time and impregnating solution concentration have a greater impact on the weight gain of the specimens. The weight-gain rate of the veneer improved dramatically when vacuum-pressured impregnation at the same concentration was increased from 2 h to 3 h, but the process was more tedious. The increase of impregnation time from 24 h to 48 h at room temperature and pressure had a greater effect on the weight-gain rate, and the change of concentration from 5% to 10% had little effect on the weight-gain rate. Overall, when the poplar veneer specimens were impregnated for 48 h, the concentration of 5% flame retardant suspension was the better process, and the average impregnation weight-gain rates of LDH, UCPR-LDH, and MCPR-LDH poplar veneer were 7.795%, 8.908%, and 9.059%, respectively.

Cone Calorimetry
As can be observed in Figure 5a, there are two obvious exothermic peaks in the three layers of plywood [41,42]. The first exothermic peak of the control plywood was the earliest, and the first exothermic peak in flame-retardant plywood with UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH was lower and delayed compared to the control plywood. The above phenomenon indicates that LDH released a large amount of water and other gases, diluting the concentration of oxygen and combustible gases, when decomposed by heat, and absorbed heat to reduce the temperature of the burning surface of the material and slow down the rate of thermal degradation. In the mid-burning period, the second exothermic peak is attributed to the charcoal

Cone Calorimetry
As can be observed in Figure 5a, there are two obvious exothermic peaks in the three layers of plywood [41,42]. The first exothermic peak of the control plywood was the earliest, and the first exothermic peak in flame-retardant plywood with UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH was lower and delayed compared to the control plywood. The above phenomenon indicates that LDH released a large amount of water and other gases, diluting the concentration of oxygen and combustible gases, when decomposed by heat, and absorbed heat to reduce the temperature of the burning surface of the material and slow down the rate of thermal degradation.
In the mid-burning period, the second exothermic peak is attributed to the charcoal layer on the burning surface. The flame either does not burn to the lower veneer or the veneer is not burned out, and a large stress is generated between the two, prompting the upper charcoal layer to fracture, which increases the flame contact area and accelerates the burning rate of plywood. Significantly, the second peak of the control plywood appeared earliest and the peak of heat release rate was highest, and the modified plywood showed different degrees of delayed heat release peak. Among the samples, the HRR of the UCPR-LDH flame-retardant plywood was reduced by 30.43% compared with the control group. This is because high temperature removes the OH-and CO 2− 3 in the interlayer structure of LDH, fundamentally altering the structure. The LDH of the lamellar structure collapses and forms MgO and Al 2 O 3 with better thermal stability, which can play the role of heat insulation and act as an oxygen barrier, thus reducing the burning rate of wood and delaying the appearance of the exothermic peak. layers of plywood [41,42]. The first exothermic peak of the control plywood was the earliest, and the first exothermic peak in flame-retardant plywood with UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH was lower and delayed compared to the control plywood. The above phenomenon indicates that LDH released a large amount of water and other gases, diluting the concentration of oxygen and combustible gases, when decomposed by heat, and absorbed heat to reduce the temperature of the burning surface of the material and slow down the rate of thermal degradation. In the mid-burning period, the second exothermic peak is attributed to the charcoal layer on the burning surface. The flame either does not burn to the lower veneer or the In Figure 5b, the THR at a burning time of 200 s was arranged by size as follows: control group > MCPR-LDH > UCPR-LDH plywood. The THR of UCPR-LDH plywood was lower than 8 kW/m 2 at this time, and the THR of plywood modified by LDH and P-N FRs was significantly lower than that of the control group. The synergistic flame retardant effect was obvious, and the THR of modified UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH plywood was reduced by about 12.03% compared with that of the control group.
When comparing the peak heat release rate with those described in other literature on flame-retardant plywood [43][44][45][46][47], the results indicate that the majority of adhesives used in the literature were formaldehyde-based, which are not environmentally friendly. As depicted in Figure 6, the UCPR-LDH plywood developed in this study not only exhibits superior thermal barrier performance but also ensures formaldehyde-free emissions while being flame-retardant. This cost-effective and high-performance approach for producing flame-retardant plywood presents a novel concept for future industrial applications. veneer is not burned out, and a large stress is generated between the two, prompting the upper charcoal layer to fracture, which increases the flame contact area and accelerates the burning rate of plywood. Significantly, the second peak of the control plywood appeared earliest and the peak of heat release rate was highest, and the modified plywood showed different degrees of delayed heat release peak. Among the samples, the HRR of the UCPR-LDH flame-retardant plywood was reduced by 30.43% compared with the control group. This is because high temperature removes the OH-and CO 2− 3 in the interlayer structure of LDH, fundamentally altering the structure. The LDH of the lamellar structure collapses and forms MgO and Al2O3 with better thermal stability, which can play the role of heat insulation and act as an oxygen barrier, thus reducing the burning rate of wood and delaying the appearance of the exothermic peak.
In Figure 5b, the THR at a burning time of 200 s was arranged by size as follows: control group > MCPR-LDH > UCPR-LDH plywood. The THR of UCPR-LDH plywood was lower than 8 kW/m 2 at this time, and the THR of plywood modified by LDH and P-N FRs was significantly lower than that of the control group. The synergistic flame retardant effect was obvious, and the THR of modified UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH plywood was reduced by about 12.03% compared with that of the control group.
When comparing the peak heat release rate with those described in other literature on flame-retardant plywood [43][44][45][46][47], the results indicate that the majority of adhesives used in the literature were formaldehyde-based, which are not environmentally friendly. As depicted in Figure 6, the UCPR-LDH plywood developed in this study not only exhibits superior thermal barrier performance but also ensures formaldehyde-free emissions while being flame-retardant. This cost-effective and high-performance approach for producing flame-retardant plywood presents a novel concept for future industrial applications.  It is obvious from Table 3 that the TTI times of the modified plywood were all extended to different degrees. Among the modified plywood, the burning time of MCPR-LDH plywood was the longest, being improved by 42 s compared with the poplar control plywood, indicating that the specimens were not easily ignited and had good flameretardant properties. As shown in Figure 7b, the trend of the MLR curve was similar to that of HRR and the peak positions of the two curves appeared the same, indicating that the mass loss rate and heat release rate showed a correlation trend. The thermal decomposition of plywood in the control group resulted in increased production of various combustible volatiles, and the heat release rate was elevated. At the same time, it also accelerated mass loss. According to Figure 7a, at about 560 s of combustion, the residual char rate of the control plywood was 18.28%, while the residual char rates of UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH were 26.20% and 28.49%, respectively. The char formation effect of plywood wood treated with LDH and P-N FRs was better. This indicates that LDH can catalyze char formation. It is obvious from Table 3 that the TTI times of the modified plywood were all extended to different degrees. Among the modified plywood, the burning time of MCPR-LDH plywood was the longest, being improved by 42 s compared with the poplar control plywood, indicating that the specimens were not easily ignited and had good flame-retardant properties. As shown in Figure 7b, the trend of the MLR curve was similar to that of HRR and the peak positions of the two curves appeared the same, indicating that the mass loss rate and heat release rate showed a correlation trend. The thermal decomposition of plywood in the control group resulted in increased production of various combustible volatiles, and the heat release rate was elevated. At the same time, it also accelerated mass loss. According to Figure 7a, at about 560 s of combustion, the residual char rate of the control plywood was 18.28%, while the residual char rates of UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH were 26.20% and 28.49%, respectively. The char formation effect of plywood wood treated with LDH and P-N FRs was better. This indicates that LDH can catalyze char formation.  Figure 8a, showing the SPR curve of plywood, illustrates that its trend is similar to the HRR and MLR curves, indicating that heat release, mass loss and smoke release occur simultaneously during the combustion of plywood. The first peak produced by threelayer plywood at the beginning of ignition is attributed to the release of smoke, water vapor, and combustible volatiles from decomposition when heated. In the middle of combustion, the second peak is caused by continuous burning, which leads to the collapse and cracking of plywood and the release of volatile compounds resulting from incomplete combustion. The peaks of the modified plywood are all shifted back, indicating that the modified plywood has smoke suppression properties. In Figure 8b, the total smoke emission of the modified plywood was reduced compared with the control group, and the lowest smoke emission of MCPR-LDH plywood was 1.61 m 2 , which was 33.62% lower than that of the control plywood.  Figure 8a, showing the SPR curve of plywood, illustrates that its trend is similar to the HRR and MLR curves, indicating that heat release, mass loss and smoke release occur simultaneously during the combustion of plywood. The first peak produced by three-layer plywood at the beginning of ignition is attributed to the release of smoke, water vapor, and combustible volatiles from decomposition when heated. In the middle of combustion, the second peak is caused by continuous burning, which leads to the collapse and cracking of plywood and the release of volatile compounds resulting from incomplete combustion. The peaks of the modified plywood are all shifted back, indicating that the modified plywood has smoke suppression properties. In Figure 8b, the total smoke emission of the modified plywood was reduced compared with the control group, and the lowest smoke emission of MCPR-LDH plywood was 1.61 m 2 , which was 33.62% lower than that of the control plywood. Polymers 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 17  Figure 9a,b shows graphs of CO and CO2 release rates. The CO2 release rate of UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH treated with flame retardant showed a decreasing trend compared with the control plywood. It is noteworthy that the peak CO2 release rate of UCPR-LDH plywood decreased by 28.87% compared with the control plywood. The modified plywood can promote the formation of carbon and reduce the production of combustible volatiles, thus reducing CO2 production. At the same time, the CO release rate of plywood treated with LDH and phosphorus-nitrogen flame retardant was lower than that of the control plywood, which could effectively reduce the concentration of carbon monoxide and the occurrence of carbon monoxide poisoning in case of fire and facilitate emergency evacuation, thus reducing casualties.

FTIR of Residual Carbon
The residual carbon FTIR spectra of the control plywood, UCPR-LDH plywood, and MCPR-LDH plywood after cone calorimetry tests are presented in Figure 10. The broad peak near 3415 cm −1 represents the stretching vibration of O−H, N−H and interlayer water molecules, and the peak near 1622 cm −1 is the absorption peak of the stretching vibration of the C=C structure with a strong peak. Near 1139 cm −1 may be the stretching vibration peak of C−O. Meanwhile, the peak at 476 cm −1 observed in the control residual carbon may be attributed to the infrared absorption peak of Ca−O, because the inorganic filler chosen for the control plywood adhesive is calcium chloride; however, the disappearance of Ca 2+ in UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH may be due to the substitution of Ca 2+ by some other ions, such as ions with small radius Mg 2+ small relative masses Al 3+ , Na + , etc. Compared with  Figure 9a,b shows graphs of CO and CO 2 release rates. The CO 2 release rate of UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH treated with flame retardant showed a decreasing trend compared with the control plywood. It is noteworthy that the peak CO 2 release rate of UCPR-LDH plywood decreased by 28.87% compared with the control plywood. The modified plywood can promote the formation of carbon and reduce the production of combustible volatiles, thus reducing CO 2 production. At the same time, the CO release rate of plywood treated with LDH and phosphorus-nitrogen flame retardant was lower than that of the control plywood, which could effectively reduce the concentration of carbon monoxide and the occurrence of carbon monoxide poisoning in case of fire and facilitate emergency evacuation, thus reducing casualties.   Figure 9a,b shows graphs of CO and CO2 release rates. The CO2 release rate of UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH treated with flame retardant showed a decreasing trend compared with the control plywood. It is noteworthy that the peak CO2 release rate of UCPR-LDH plywood decreased by 28.87% compared with the control plywood. The modified plywood can promote the formation of carbon and reduce the production of combustible volatiles, thus reducing CO2 production. At the same time, the CO release rate of plywood treated with LDH and phosphorus-nitrogen flame retardant was lower than that of the control plywood, which could effectively reduce the concentration of carbon monoxide and the occurrence of carbon monoxide poisoning in case of fire and facilitate emergency evacuation, thus reducing casualties.

FTIR of Residual Carbon
The residual carbon FTIR spectra of the control plywood, UCPR-LDH plywood, and MCPR-LDH plywood after cone calorimetry tests are presented in Figure 10. The broad peak near 3415 cm −1 represents the stretching vibration of O−H, N−H and interlayer water molecules, and the peak near 1622 cm −1 is the absorption peak of the stretching vibration of the C=C structure with a strong peak. Near 1139 cm −1 may be the stretching vibration peak of C−O. Meanwhile, the peak at 476 cm −1 observed in the control residual carbon may be attributed to the infrared absorption peak of Ca−O, because the inorganic filler chosen for the control plywood adhesive is calcium chloride; however, the disappearance of Ca 2+ in UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH may be due to the substitution of Ca 2+ by some other ions, such as ions with small radius Mg 2+ small relative masses Al 3+ , Na + , etc. Compared with Figure 9. CO production rate (a), CO 2 production rate (b) plots of wood samples.

FTIR of Residual Carbon
The residual carbon FTIR spectra of the control plywood, UCPR-LDH plywood, and MCPR-LDH plywood after cone calorimetry tests are presented in Figure 10. The broad peak near 3415 cm −1 represents the stretching vibration of O−H, N−H and interlayer water molecules, and the peak near 1622 cm −1 is the absorption peak of the stretching vibration of the C=C structure with a strong peak. Near 1139 cm −1 may be the stretching vibration peak of C−O. Meanwhile, the peak at 476 cm −1 observed in the control residual carbon may be attributed to the infrared absorption peak of Ca−O, because the inorganic filler chosen for the control plywood adhesive is calcium chloride; however, the disappearance of Ca 2+ in UCPR-LDH and MCPR-LDH may be due to the substitution of Ca 2+ by some other ions, such as ions with small radius Mg 2+ small relative masses Al 3+ , Na + , etc. Compared with the control group, the peaks between 450−650 cm −1 in the modified plywood residual

Conclusions
In summary, this study has demonstrated a cost-effective and simple approach for the preparation of formaldehyde-free plywood with flame-retardant properties. Two novel phosphorus-nitrogen flame retardants were successfully synthesized, with the optimal synthesis process of UCPR being a 4.55:1 molar ratio of CP and urea, with a reaction temperature and reaction time of 75 °C and 75 min. The optimal synthesis process of MCPR is a 9:1 molar ratio of CP and melamine, with a reaction temperature and reaction time of 70 °C and 75 min. Additionally, LDH was introduced and modified by intercalation to achieve a synergistic organic-inorganic flame retardance effect and enhance the flame-retardant efficiency of plywood. The flame-retardant formaldehyde-free plywood was produced through impregnation with a 5% concentration of flame retardant at room temperature and pressure for 48 h, as well as the substitution of inorganic filler components in the API adhesive with the above prepared flame retardants.
FTIR analysis revealed that the IR spectra of UCPR and MCPR were analogous to those of CP, with a discernible P-O-C bond at 1045 cm −1 . NMR patterns showed that both synthesized UCPR and MCPR contained characteristic peaks of the corresponding groups. GPC chromatography demonstrated an increase in molecular weight for both UCPR and MCPR, as well as a more uniform distribution. The cone calorimetry test revealed that the UCPR-LDH plywood exhibited a total heat release of less than 8 kW/m 2 at 200 s, and its pHRR was 30.43% lower than that of the control plywood, indicating a better thermal barrier performance. Meanwhile, the MCPR-LDH plywood demonstrated enhanced smoke suppression capabilities, with a reduction in TSP by 33.62% compared to the control plywood. The production of both CO and CO2 of the fire-retardant modified plywoods was reduced while effectively controlling the generation of smoke toxicity.

Conclusions
In summary, this study has demonstrated a cost-effective and simple approach for the preparation of formaldehyde-free plywood with flame-retardant properties. Two novel phosphorus-nitrogen flame retardants were successfully synthesized, with the optimal synthesis process of UCPR being a 4.55:1 molar ratio of CP and urea, with a reaction temperature and reaction time of 75 • C and 75 min. The optimal synthesis process of MCPR is a 9:1 molar ratio of CP and melamine, with a reaction temperature and reaction time of 70 • C and 75 min. Additionally, LDH was introduced and modified by intercalation to achieve a synergistic organic-inorganic flame retardance effect and enhance the flameretardant efficiency of plywood. The flame-retardant formaldehyde-free plywood was produced through impregnation with a 5% concentration of flame retardant at room temperature and pressure for 48 h, as well as the substitution of inorganic filler components in the API adhesive with the above prepared flame retardants.
FTIR analysis revealed that the IR spectra of UCPR and MCPR were analogous to those of CP, with a discernible P-O-C bond at 1045 cm −1 . NMR patterns showed that both synthesized UCPR and MCPR contained characteristic peaks of the corresponding groups. GPC chromatography demonstrated an increase in molecular weight for both UCPR and MCPR, as well as a more uniform distribution. The cone calorimetry test revealed that the UCPR-LDH plywood exhibited a total heat release of less than 8 kW/m 2 at 200 s, and its pHRR was 30.43% lower than that of the control plywood, indicating a better thermal barrier performance. Meanwhile, the MCPR-LDH plywood demonstrated enhanced smoke suppression capabilities, with a reduction in TSP by 33.62% compared to the control plywood. The production of both CO and CO 2 of the fire-retardant modified plywoods was reduced while effectively controlling the generation of smoke toxicity. FTIR analysis of the residual carbon obtained from the conical calorimetric test revealed the presence of