Effect of Shear Angle and Printing Orientation on Shear Constitutive Response of Additively Manufactured Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene

An experimental investigation was performed to understand the quasi-static shear response of additively manufactured (AM) acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) via fusion deposition modeling (FDM). A modified flat hat-shaped (FHS) specimen configuration was used for shear testing. The main aim of this study was to investigate the effect of four different shear angles (0°, 5.44°, 13.39°, and 20.83°) and three printing orientations (vertical build, 0°/90°, and 45°/−45°) on the shear constitutive response and shear performance of FDM-printed ABS. Scanning electron microscopy images of the failure surface were used to explain the shear response of the material. The flow shear stress of the shear stress-strain response for vertically printed specimens demonstrated a monotonic increase up to a peak shear stress and then decrease at the end of the shear zone, while for 0°/90° specimens, an increasing trend until the peak value at the end of the shear zone was observed. With increasing shear angles, all specimens printed with three printing orientations exhibited increasing shear zone size and shear strength, and the 0°/90° specimens exhibited the highest shear strength for all four shear angles. However, the specimens of the 45°/−45° orientation demonstrated the highest increase in shear strength by about 60% and in the shear strain at the end of shear zone by about 175% as the shear angle was increased from 0° to 20.83°.


Introduction
Additive manufacturing (AM), generally known as 3D printing, has advanced to a great extent in the last decade. It has many advantages, particularly in its capability of prototyping or fabricating customized products of complex structures and shapes without having to use any additional tools or processing [1]. Out of all polymer-based AM techniques, fusion deposition modeling (FDM) has been widely used as functional parts in manufacturing and assembly models [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Among various thermoplastic polymer-based filament materials for FDM, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) has been widely studied and used in developing functional prototypes due its high strength, toughness, light weight, and resilience [9]. Many studies on tensile, compressive, flexural, and fracture characterization of 3D-printed ABS with various printing parameters have been reported in literature. Rodriguez et al. [10] studied the mechanical behavior of FDM printed ABS under tensile loading, where Young's modulus decreased by 11% to 37%, and the tensile strength reduced by 22% to 57% relative to an ABS monofilament. Ahn et al. [11] investigated the effect of raster orientation, air gap, bead width, and model temperature on tensile and compressive anisotropic mechanical properties of ABS specimens printed in different directions. For an overlap of 76 µm between the roads, the tensile strength ranged between 65% and 72% to those of injection molded ABS. Abbot et al. [12] studied the impact of nozzle temperature, fracture toughness was achieved by increasing the size of the circular pattern, as well as by changing the pattern shape to square. More recently, Ameri et al. [26] predicted fracture loads of FDM-printed ABS specimens under mixed-mode fracture loading conditions. In this study, the authors compared the fracture loads measured through experiments with those of Maximum Tangential Stress (MTS) and Generalized Maximum Tangential Stress (GMTS) criteria. The predicted fracture loads using the GMTS criterion were closely matched with those from experiments. Nabavi-Kivi et al. [27] investigated the influence of printing speed and mode-mixity on the fracture response of FDM-printed ABS. The highest mixed-mode fracture toughness was observed from the specimens with a printing speed of 50 mm/s. Despite many studies on tensile, compression, flexure, and fracture characterizations of FDM-printed ABS, no attempts have been made in understanding its shear constitutive behaviors to date, due to the challenge involved in identifying a specimen configuration suitable for testing for shear deformation. In this study, a modified flat hat-shaped (FHS) specimen configuration was used to determine the shear constitutive response of FDM-printed ABS; a parametric study was conducted to investigate the effect of printing orientation and shear angle on the shear strength. The major novelty of this study was to identify a suitable specimen configuration to understand the shear behavior in FDM-printed polymers and investigate an optimum shear angle and raster orientation for superior shear performance. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging was employed to gain insights into the failure mechanisms.

Material and Specimen Design
A modified flat hat-shaped (FHS) specimen, as shown in Figure 1, was fabricated utilizing a uPrint 3D printer (Stratasys, Eden Prairie, MN, USA). This modified FHS specimen configuration was adopted from cracked FHS, which was used for determining the dynamic fracture toughness of metals by Xu et al. [28]. In this study ABS-P430 (Stratasys, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) was considered because it is strong, rigid, resistant to abrasion, and impact-resistant. It is widely used in functional prototyping, jigs, fixtures, pipe fittings, auto parts, and electronic housings. In general, ABS is a terpolymer consisting of three monomers: acrylonitrile; butadiene; and styrene. The amount of each monomer in the ABS can range from 15% to 35% acrylonitrile, 5% to 30% butadiene, and 40% to 60% styrene. Although the ABS-P430 filament is commercially available, it is a proprietary mixture; hence, the exact percentage of each monomer is not publicly disclosed. The melt flow index (MFI) of ABS-P430 is 2.4 g/10 min. The tensile strength of the ABS-P430 is 36 MPa, the tensile modulus is 2.4 GPa, and the tensile elongation at break is 4%.
Beforehand, the specimens were designed and configured for fabrication utilizing a computer-aided design software, SolidWorks. Once completed, the file was exported in the form of a stereolithography (STL) file, which was then sent to the uPrint. The Stratasys' 3D printer utilized a printing software called CatalystEx to interpret the STL file and eventually fabricate the test sample. It employed a process of discretization, which essentially slices the specimen and builds a blueprint of each layer corresponding to the printer's extruder. This extruder is guided along a path predetermined by the software of the printer through the generation of a G code. This G code directs the printer to follow the predetermined extrusion path, which is also known as printing or raster orientation. All specimens of three different orientations were printed with the same extrusion parameters, which are listed with details in Table 1 to ensure consistent printing processing conditions. These parameters were provided by Stratasys to generate the optimum quality of printed parts of ABS. Figure 1 provides the schematic of three different printing orientations (vertical, 45 • /−45 • , 0 • /90 • ) considered in this study. For specimen material, Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) was considered, as it is widely used in industrial applications. Beforehand, the specimens were designed and configured for fabrication computer-aided design software, SolidWorks. Once completed, the file was e the form of a stereolithography (STL) file, which was then sent to the uPrint. The 3D printer utilized a printing software called CatalystEx to interpret the STL file tually fabricate the test sample. It employed a process of discretization, which slices the specimen and builds a blueprint of each layer corresponding to th extruder. This extruder is guided along a path predetermined by the softw printer through the generation of a G code. This G code directs the printer to predetermined extrusion path, which is also known as printing or raster orien specimens of three different orientations were printed with the same extrusio ters, which are listed with details in Table 1 to ensure consistent printing proce ditions. These parameters were provided by Stratasys to generate the optimum printed parts of ABS. Figure 1 provides the schematic of three different printin tions (vertical, 45°/−45°, 0°/90°) considered in this study. For specimen material trile butadiene styrene (ABS) was considered, as it is widely used in industri tions.  In this study, in addition to three raster orientations, four shear angle orientations (0 • , 5.44 • , 13.39 • , and 20.83 • ) were incorporated into the specimen to analyze the effect of the shear angle on the shear deformation and shear performance of the ABS. An illustration of shear angle in the shear zone of the test specimen is shown in Figure 2. A detailed illustration of the shear test specimens used in this study with all dimensions is given in Figure 3. The geometric dimensions used for various shear angles of test specimens are given in Table 2. These shear angles were chosen based on the distance between OD1 and ID of the hat shown in Figure 3. For similar values of OD1 and ID, the shear angle was 0 • ; for a difference of 0.4mm, the shear angle was 5.44 • ; for a difference of 1 mm, the shear angle was 13.39 • ; and for a difference of 1.6 mm, the shear angle was 20.83 • .
given in Figure 3. The geometric dimensions used for various sh mens are given in Table 2. These shear angles were chosen based OD1 and ID of the hat shown in Figure 3. For similar values of angle was 0°; for a difference of 0.4mm, the shear angle was 5.4 mm, the shear angle was 13.39°; and for a difference of 1.6 mm, the  illustration of shear angle in the shear zone of the test specimen is shown in Figure 2. A detailed illustration of the shear test specimens used in this study with all dimensions is given in Figure 3. The geometric dimensions used for various shear angles of test specimens are given in Table 2. These shear angles were chosen based on the distance between OD1 and ID of the hat shown in Figure 3. For similar values of OD1 and ID, the shear angle was 0°; for a difference of 0.4mm, the shear angle was 5.44°; for a difference of 1 mm, the shear angle was 13.39°; and for a difference of 1.6 mm, the shear angle was 20.83°.   Table 2.   Table 2.

Shear Characterization
Experiments were performed on the shear test specimens using an INSTRON 5569 (Instron, Norwood, MA, USA) in displacement mode. As shown in Figure 4, the specimens were placed between two compression platens, where the top platen was moved at a displacement rate of 1.27 mm/min. The experiments were done at room temperature, where load-point displacements and load values were recorded for each test specimen. The compression of the top hat induced pure shear deformation between the notches in the shear zone (as shown in Figure 2). Using the MicroCapture ® Pro digital microscope (Instron, Norwood, MA, USA), the shear deformation was captured for the entire experiment duration. A minimum of six identical experiments were performed for each configuration to have statistical significance. Using load-point displacement and applied compressive load, the shear strain and shear stress were calculated using the following equations: where γ is the shear strain, d represents load-point displacement, θ represents the shear angle, and shzl represents the length of the shear zone between the two notches. τ represents the shear stress, while F is the applied compressive force, and A S represents the shear area of the test specimen.

Shear Characterization
Experiments were performed on the shear test specimens using an INSTRON 5569 (Instron, Norwood, MA, USA) in displacement mode. As shown in Figure 4, the specimens were placed between two compression platens, where the top platen was moved at a displacement rate of 1.27 mm/min. The experiments were done at room temperature, where load-point displacements and load values were recorded for each test specimen. The compression of the top hat induced pure shear deformation between the notches in the shear zone (as shown in Figure 2). Using the MicroCapture ® Pro digital microscope (Instron, Norwood, MA, USA), the shear deformation was captured for the entire experiment duration. A minimum of six identical experiments were performed for each configuration to have statistical significance. Using load-point displacement and applied compressive load, the shear strain and shear stress were calculated using the following equations: where γ is the shear strain, d represents load-point displacement, θ represents the shear angle, and shzl represents the length of the shear zone between the two notches. τ represents the shear stress, while F is the applied compressive force, and AS represents the shear area of the test specimen.
(a) (b)  Figure 5 represents the shear stress-strain response for specimens of different shear angles for vertical raster orientation. Considering statistical significance, a minimum of five specimens were tested for each shear angle of a given raster orientation. A representative curve for each shear angle was selected for plotting in the figure. The region between the dotted vertical lines drawn for each stress-strain curve of different shear angles represents the shear zone. The first dotted vertical line denotes the start of the noticeable shear deformation, and the second dotted vertical line denotes the end of shearing and the start of sliding of the sheared piece. The stress-strain response before the first dotted vertical line was nearly linear, and during this stage, shear stress was built up within the shear zone of the test specimen to generate noticeable shear deformation, which was captured using the imaging system. Figure 6 provides a sample of sequential specimen images of the video recorded in relation to the shear stress-strain response. The response of the sample was broken up and characterized by the following three zones: sample with small visually unnoticeable shear deformation, sample under significant shearing deformation (shear zone), and sample under sliding (sliding zone). During the first zone, the specimen underwent nearly linear elastic deformation before it became nonlinear at the end of this zone. In zone-2, the sample experienced a significant amount of shear deformation nearly at constant flow stress. The visual change of shear zone was noticeable due to the color variation of the specimen in the two notch regions undergoing shear deformation. This color variation is associated with plastically deformed polymer chains of the printed filaments. The final stage (zone-3) was characterized by the rapid descent in loading and the sample beginning to slide. During the sliding, the test specimen failed to withhold the applied load, leading to the separation of hat portion from rest of the specimen.   It can be noticed in the shear zone of Figure 5 that the specimen experienced maximum shear stress (shear strength) at a later part of the shear zone as the shear angle of the specimen increased. Moreover, both the shear flow stress within the shear zone and the length of the shear zone increased as the shear angle of the shear test specimen increased.

Results and Discussion
The measured values of shear zone length (in terms of units of shear strain, which is in radians) for different shear angles is shown in Table 3. The shear zone increased by about 3.5-times when the shear angle increased from 0 • to 20.83 • for specimens of vertical roster orientation. This could be explained by the fact that the incremental shear angle gave way for more filament in the specimen's shear region, which led to an increased length of the shear zone of the flat hat specimen, as listed in Table 2. During the sliding portion of the stress-strain diagram of each shear angle, the shear stress dropped as the material in the shear zone was no longer connected to the supports of the specimen. A schematic of the failure of extruded filaments for test specimens of each raster orientation is shown in Figure 7. For vertical raster orientation, as shown in Figure 7a, the extruded filaments of horizontal direction got sheared off under shear deformation. In Figure 7b were sheared off. Finally, for specimens of 0 • /90 • raster orientation, shown in Figure 7c, the filaments of 0 • were sheared off, whereas those of 90 • remain intact. Figure 8 shows the image of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of vertically printed test specimens. It is clearly evident from the failure surface that the filaments that were oriented horizontally in the vertical built were sheared with a large deformation. During this process of shearing, the gaps that typically exist between the extruded filaments while printing were also closed. Moreover, the failure surface of sheared filaments showed a smooth surface due to less resistance offered by the filaments compared to the other two raster orientations, as the shear flow stress gradually reached a maximum value and decreased steadily until the end of the shear zone, as shown in Figure 5.   Figure 9 shows the shear stress-strain response of the printing raster orientations of +45°/−45°. The shear stress-strain responses demonstrated a similar trend to those of vertical raster orientation as the shear angle increased. However, unlike vertical orientation, the shear stress-strain curve demonstrated an initial increase and a slight drop before a further increase during the shear zone. This variation was attributed to the +45°/−45° pattern of filament orientation, where the extruded filaments offered slight compliance in the shear flow stress before increasing the slope, especially for the higher shear angles of 13.39° and 20.83°. As provided in Table 3, like the vertical orientation, the shear zone length also increased with the shear angle for the +45°/−45° orientation. In general, the shear zone size was slightly higher for the +45°/−45° orientation compared to vertical ori-   Figure 9 shows the shear stress-strain response of the printing raster orientations of +45°/−45°. The shear stress-strain responses demonstrated a similar trend to those of vertical raster orientation as the shear angle increased. However, unlike vertical orientation, the shear stress-strain curve demonstrated an initial increase and a slight drop before a further increase during the shear zone. This variation was attributed to the +45°/−45° pattern of filament orientation, where the extruded filaments offered slight compliance in the  Figure 9 shows the shear stress-strain response of the printing raster orientations of +45 • /−45 • . The shear stress-strain responses demonstrated a similar trend to those of vertical raster orientation as the shear angle increased. However, unlike vertical orientation, the shear stress-strain curve demonstrated an initial increase and a slight drop before a further increase during the shear zone. This variation was attributed to the +45 • /−45 • pattern of filament orientation, where the extruded filaments offered slight compliance in the shear flow stress before increasing the slope, especially for the higher shear angles of 13.39 • and 20.83 • . As provided in Table 3, like the vertical orientation, the shear zone length also increased with the shear angle for the +45 • /−45 • orientation. In general, the shear zone size was slightly higher for the +45 • /−45 • orientation compared to vertical orientation. During the shear deformation in the +45 • /−45 • orientation, the extruded filaments of both +45 • and −45 • directions underwent shear failure, as shown in the schematic of Figure 7b. The SEM images of the shear failure surface of the test specimen for +45 • /−45 • orientation are shown in Figure 10. The failure surface indicated the highly rough surface with several ridge markings compared to the vertical orientation. This could be related to the shear flow stress variation during the shear zone, as shown in the Figure 9, where the increase in the slope of the flow stress was associated with energy required to deform and shear off the extruded filaments. During this process, the filaments undergo a large amount of localized deformation, which results a rough failure surface, as shown in Figure 10. In the literature, the fracture surface of FDM-printed ABS of +45 • /−45 • orientation under mixed-mode (a combination of opening and shear loading) fracture conditions demonstrated fewer ridge markings on the broken filaments [27]. However, several ridge markings were noticed in this work on the failure surface of the specimens subjected to shear loading.   Figure 11 provides the shear stress-strain response of all four shear angles for specimens of the 0°/90° raster orientation. Like the other two orientations, the shear flow stress and length of the shear zone increased as the shear angle increased. Most importantly, the size of the shear zone for 0/90° at a shear angle of 0° was much higher than the other two raster orientations, as given in Table 3. This was due to a higher resistance for shearing of the extruded filaments of 0° in the presence of 90° extruded filaments. If this value was compared with vertical raster orientation, where all the extruded filaments were along the horizontal direction, they got sheared with less than half of the shear zone length than that of 0/90° raster orientation. Furthermore, this reason could be reinforced with the nature of the shear stress-strain diagram of the 0/90° raster orientation, where the shear stress did not drop off after reaching the maximum value for the shear angle of 0°. However, in the case of the other two orientations, the shear stress value dropped as soon as it reached the maximum value. One other major difference was that the specimens of the 0/90° raster orientation showed peak shear stress at the end of the shear zone compared to all other raster orientations. This could be explained by the fact that for the 0/90° raster orientation, the extruded filaments in the 0° direction sheared off, while they were sandwiched between the two extruded filaments of the 90° direction. As shown in SEM images of Figure  12, the extruded filaments along the 0° underwent severe localized deformation. While these filaments experienced large deformation, the filaments in the 90° offered constraint. This constraint was demonstrated by the increase in shear stress as the shear strain increased, until the specimen reached the maximum shear stress value, as shown in Figure  11. In comparison, the failure surface of FDM-printed ABS of a 0/90° orientation under tensile loading demonstrated brittle failure of the filaments along 0°. Moreover, the pores between the 0° and 90° filaments were intact, even after failure of the specimen [29].  Figure 11 provides the shear stress-strain response of all four shear angles for specimens of the 0 • /90 • raster orientation. Like the other two orientations, the shear flow stress and length of the shear zone increased as the shear angle increased. Most importantly, the size of the shear zone for 0/90 • at a shear angle of 0 • was much higher than the other two raster orientations, as given in Table 3. This was due to a higher resistance for shearing of the extruded filaments of 0 • in the presence of 90 • extruded filaments. If this value was compared with vertical raster orientation, where all the extruded filaments were along the horizontal direction, they got sheared with less than half of the shear zone length than that of 0/90 • raster orientation. Furthermore, this reason could be reinforced with the nature of the shear stress-strain diagram of the 0/90 • raster orientation, where the shear stress did not drop off after reaching the maximum value for the shear angle of 0 • . However, in the case of the other two orientations, the shear stress value dropped as soon as it reached the maximum value. One other major difference was that the specimens of the 0/90 • raster orientation showed peak shear stress at the end of the shear zone compared to all other raster orientations. This could be explained by the fact that for the 0/90 • raster orientation, the extruded filaments in the 0 • direction sheared off, while they were sandwiched between the two extruded filaments of the 90 • direction. As shown in SEM images of Figure 12, the extruded filaments along the 0 • underwent severe localized deformation. While these filaments experienced large deformation, the filaments in the 90 • offered constraint. This constraint was demonstrated by the increase in shear stress as the shear strain increased, until the specimen reached the maximum shear stress value, as shown in Figure 11. In comparison, the failure surface of FDM-printed ABS of a 0/90 • orientation under tensile loading demonstrated brittle failure of the filaments along 0 • . Moreover, the pores between the 0 • and 90 • filaments were intact, even after failure of the specimen [29].  A comprehensive plot of the shear strength of all three raster orientations and four shear angles is shown in Figure 13. In general, the shear strength increased as the shear   A comprehensive plot of the shear strength of all three raster orientations and four shear angles is shown in Figure 13. In general, the shear strength increased as the shear A comprehensive plot of the shear strength of all three raster orientations and four shear angles is shown in Figure 13. In general, the shear strength increased as the shear angle increased for all three raster orientations. However, the shear strength increased only by about 50% for vertical orientation, by about 63% for the +45 • /−45 • orientation, and by about 55% for the 0 • /90 • orientation, as the shear angle increased from 0 • to 20.83 • . Although the percentage increase of shear strength for 0 • /90 • was less than that of the +45 • /−45 • orientation, the values of the shear strength for all four shear angles of 0 • /90 • were slightly higher than those of all of the other two orientations. This was due to the presence of a constraint provided by the extruded filaments of the 90 • direction, as the filaments of 0 • underwent large-scale shear deformation and failure. This was clearly evident from the shear stress-strain response that the shear flow stress increased as the shear strain increased, and the maximum shear stress happened at the end of the shear zone (shown in Figure 11) against other two raster orientations, except for a specimen of a shear angle of 20.83 • for the +45 • /−45 • raster orientation. When the shear strength values shown in Figure 13 were compared with tensile strength values of the 0 • /90 • and +45 • /−45 • orientations, the shear strength for the shear angle of 0 • was about 65% less than that of the tensile strength for both raster orientations [27,29].
only by about 50% for vertical orientation, by about 63% for the +45°/−45° orientation, and by about 55% for the 0°/90° orientation, as the shear angle increased from 0° to 20.83°. Although the percentage increase of shear strength for 0°/90° was less than that of the +45°/−45° orientation, the values of the shear strength for all four shear angles of 0°/90° were slightly higher than those of all of the other two orientations. This was due to the presence of a constraint provided by the extruded filaments of the 90° direction, as the filaments of 0° underwent large-scale shear deformation and failure. This was clearly evident from the shear stress-strain response that the shear flow stress increased as the shear strain increased, and the maximum shear stress happened at the end of the shear zone (shown in Figure 11) against other two raster orientations, except for a specimen of a shear angle of 20.83° for the +45°/−45° raster orientation. When the shear strength values shown in Figure 13 were compared with tensile strength values of the 0°/90° and +45°/−45° orientations, the shear strength for the shear angle of 0° was about 65% less than that of the tensile strength for both raster orientations [27,29].  Figure 14 provides the shear strain at the end of the shear zone for all shear angles and raster orientations. For a vertical raster orientation, the shear strain value showed a sharper increase by 75% when the shear angle increased from 0° to 5.44°. Beyond the shear angle of 5.44°, the increase in shear strain was steady. This shear angle can be called a critical shear angle for vertical orientation. For the other two raster orientations (+45°/−45° and 0°/90°), the critical shear angle associated with the sharper rise in the shear strain value was 13.89°. Out of these two orientations, the highest increase of a 200% increase in the shear strain value was noticed for the +45°/−45° orientation, when the shear angle changed from 5.44° to 13.89°. The failure surface imaged from SEM of a shear angle of 13.89° indicates that the specimen underwent severe localized shear deformation, as shown in Figure 15. Conversely, at the shear angle of 5.44°, the filaments experienced failure with a rough surface (shown in Figure 10), indicating relatively brittle failure compared to that of 13.89°. Although ultimate tensile strain values have been reported in the literature for the +45°/−45° orientation [29], they could not be compared with the  Figure 14 provides the shear strain at the end of the shear zone for all shear angles and raster orientations. For a vertical raster orientation, the shear strain value showed a sharper increase by 75% when the shear angle increased from 0 • to 5.44 • . Beyond the shear angle of 5.44 • , the increase in shear strain was steady. This shear angle can be called a critical shear angle for vertical orientation. For the other two raster orientations (+45 • /−45 • and 0 • /90 • ), the critical shear angle associated with the sharper rise in the shear strain value was 13.89 • . Out of these two orientations, the highest increase of a 200% increase in the shear strain value was noticed for the +45 • /−45 • orientation, when the shear angle changed from 5.44 • to 13.89 • . The failure surface imaged from SEM of a shear angle of 13.89 • indicates that the specimen underwent severe localized shear deformation, as shown in Figure 15. Conversely, at the shear angle of 5.44 • , the filaments experienced failure with a rough surface (shown in Figure 10), indicating relatively brittle failure compared to that of 13.89 • . Although ultimate tensile strain values have been reported in the literature for the +45 • /−45 • orientation [29], they could not be compared with the maximum shear strain values at the end of shear zone due to the nature of how they are determined. maximum shear strain values at the end of shear zone due to the nature of how they are determined.

Conclusions
A detailed experimental study was conducted to investigate the shear behavior of an FDM-printed ABS polymer under quasi-static shear loading conditions. The effect of raster orientations and the shear angles on the shear stress-strain response, shear zone, and the shear strength was investigated. The following were the major outcomes of this study: As the shear angle increased, the shear zone size and shear strength increased for all three raster orientations.
The flow shear stress in the vertical raster orientation during the shear zone demonstrated a monotonic increase up to a peak shear stress and then a decrease at the end of the shear zone. However, the flow shear stress showed an increasing trend until the peak value at the end of the shear zone for the 0°/90° raster orientation.

Conclusions
A detailed experimental study was conducted to investigate the shear behavior of an FDM-printed ABS polymer under quasi-static shear loading conditions. The effect of raster orientations and the shear angles on the shear stress-strain response, shear zone, and the shear strength was investigated. The following were the major outcomes of this study: As the shear angle increased, the shear zone size and shear strength increased for all three raster orientations.
The flow shear stress in the vertical raster orientation during the shear zone demonstrated a monotonic increase up to a peak shear stress and then a decrease at the end of the shear zone. However, the flow shear stress showed an increasing trend until the peak value at the end of the shear zone for the 0°/90° raster orientation.

Conclusions
A detailed experimental study was conducted to investigate the shear behavior of an FDM-printed ABS polymer under quasi-static shear loading conditions. The effect of raster orientations and the shear angles on the shear stress-strain response, shear zone, and the shear strength was investigated. The following were the major outcomes of this study: As the shear angle increased, the shear zone size and shear strength increased for all three raster orientations.
The flow shear stress in the vertical raster orientation during the shear zone demonstrated a monotonic increase up to a peak shear stress and then a decrease at the end of the shear zone. However, the flow shear stress showed an increasing trend until the peak value at the end of the shear zone for the 0 • /90 • raster orientation.
The shear strengths of all four shear angles of the 0 • /90 • raster orientation were slightly higher than those of the other two orientations due to the constraint provided by the extruded filaments in the 90 • direction, while the extruded filaments of the 0 • direction underwent large-scale plastic deformation, as noticed in SEM images.
The shear strain value at the end of the shear zone demonstrated a sharp increase at a certain critical shear angle for all three orientations. The +45 • /−45 • raster orientation experienced the highest increase of about 200% at a shear angle of 13.89 • . This increase was related to severe localized plastic deformation, as seen in SEM imaging.
The results of this study, such as shear constitutive response, shear strength, shear zone, and shear strain at the end of shear zone, can be used for designing ABS parts that are subjected to shear loading in industrial applications. They can also be used in material models of the finite element analysis of fixtures and parts of real-life applications.  Data Availability Statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.