Optimization of Alkaline Activator on the Strength Properties of Geopolymer Concrete

This study investigates the effects of red mud on the performance of geopolymer concrete in regard to fresh and mechanical properties. Red mud was used as a binder, and GGBS replaced the binder. Different proportions of red mud ranging from 0 to 30% with an interval of 2% and activator agents such as KOH and K2SiO3 for various alkaline-to-binder ratios such as 0.30, 0.40, and 0.50 were used; their effect on the fresh and mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete were the focusing parameter on the current study. Fresh properties such as setting time, slump, compaction factor, and vee-bee consistometer test, and mechanical properties such as compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, modulus of elasticity, and impact energy were studied. ANOVA and radar plot analysis were studied for various alkaline to binder (A/B) compressive strength results tested for 7 to 90 days. The increase of red mud quantity caused the decline of workability, but there was continuous enhancement of mechanical properties of GPC up to a specific limit. An alkaline-to-binder ratio of 0.4 shows excellent results compared with other ratios at ambient conditions for strength properties. ANOVA and radar plot reveal that A/B of 0.40 for 90 days shows excellent results compared with other ratios, and CS values vary in a linear manner.


Introduction
In recent years, the sustainable construction of materials has been gaining more attention, especially geopolymer concrete (GPC), which utilizes industrial waste products as binding materials and shows better mechanical properties than OPC [1]. Geopolymer is a primary material composed of an aluminosilicate substance made of a crosslinked structure of AlO 4 and SiO 4 [2,3]. It is often manufactured from silicon and aluminum-rich materials, which can stimulate the synthesis of aluminosilicate in a high alkalinity environment [4,5]. When reacting with alkali, fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast-furnaces slag (GGBS) produce an inorganic polymer binder through polymerization called a geopolymer [6,7]. Factors such as alkaline agents, particle size distribution, and particle size significantly affect the polymerization process [8][9][10]. It was reported that an increase in FA content as binding material increases the CS and substantially impacts the rheology property of GPC. The GPC matrix with industrial waste as binder content decreased carbon emission by 30% to 50% with fly ash and slag [11,12]. Red mud is an appropriate geopolymer precursor

Materials Used
Raw materials used to make GPC were GGBS and RM as a binder, and their chemical compositions and physical properties of GPC are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The size, shape, pore size distribution, and roughness affect particles of specific surface areas. KOH and K2SiO3 were procured for their study from Suresh Chemicals, Belgaum. For this study, GGBS obtained from Bellary Jindal steel was stored in tight bags, confirmed as per IS 12089, with specific gravity of 2.88. Red mud was procured from Belagavi Karnataka, with specific gravity of 2.68. Locally available river sands and courses were used as aggregates. Fine aggregate has 4.75 mm downsizes with specific gravity as 2.6, fineness modulus as 3, and water absorption as 1%. The coarse aggregate with 20 mm downsizes was used, with specific gravity of 2.8, fineness modulus of 7.0, and water absorption as 1.12%, which was confirmed as per IS: 383, and distilled water was added during the preparation of fresh concrete to improve workability and to make the mix a homogeneous mix.

Materials Used
Raw materials used to make GPC were GGBS and RM as a binder, and their chemical compositions and physical properties of GPC are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The size, shape, pore size distribution, and roughness affect particles of specific surface areas. KOH and K 2 SiO 3 were procured for their study from Suresh Chemicals, Belgaum. For this study, GGBS obtained from Bellary Jindal steel was stored in tight bags, confirmed as per IS 12089, with specific gravity of 2.88. Red mud was procured from Belagavi Karnataka, with specific gravity of 2.68. Locally available river sands and courses were used as aggregates. Fine aggregate has 4.75 mm downsizes with specific gravity as 2.6, fineness modulus as 3, and water absorption as 1%. The coarse aggregate with 20 mm downsizes was used, with specific gravity of 2.8, fineness modulus of 7.0, and water absorption as 1.12%, which was confirmed as per IS: 383, and distilled water was added during the preparation of fresh concrete to improve workability and to make the mix a homogeneous mix.

Preparation of GPC
After classifying the materials required for the preparation of GPC, mix design was prepared after referring to various literature papers and IS code 10262. The basic tests and analysis on all the ingredients of GPC were carried out, i.e., the physical property of procured ingredients of GPC was investigated. KOH was in the pellet form of solid, and they were converted into a liquid by adding considerable water and maintaining the molar concentration of 16 M. The alkaline solution was prepared a day before the casting of GPC. During the day of casting, each ingredient was weighed, dry uniformly mixed, the alkaline solution was mixed with ingredients, and fresh GPC was prepared. The mixing of concrete was carried out through a concrete mixer. The slump (SV), compaction factor (CF), and VB consistometer (VBC) of geopolymer concrete (GPC) were observed during its new state. Casted cubes, cylinders, and beams were tested per IS code. Cube specimens preparation is shown in Figure 2a, beam specimens before testing for 28 days is shown in Figure 2b, failure pattern of beam after 28 days of testing is shown in Figure 2c-e.
Cube of 15 cm 3 , cylinder of 15 × 30 cm 2 , beam of 15 × 15 × 50 mm 3 were the sizes of specimens cast. Specimens were cured at ambient temperature in the room and covered with bunny bags. Specimens were tested at 7, 14, 28, and 90 days. The mix proportions of GPC are shown in Table 3. CS results tested at 7, 14, 28, and 90 days were used for performing the ANOVA analysis for various A/B ratios of 0.30, 0.40, and 0.50 using the software.

Initial and Final Setting
Geopolymer paste for A/B ratios of 0.30, 0.40, and 0.50 for various mixes from G0 to GS2.0 was prepared, and a setting time test was carried out. Initial and final setting a b c d e

Initial and Final Setting
Geopolymer paste for A/B ratios of 0.30, 0.40, and 0.50 for various mixes from G0 to GS2.0 was prepared, and a setting time test was carried out. Initial and final setting times of geopolymer paste determined by Vicat apparatus were confirmed as per IS code IS 5513.  For the A/B ratio of 0.3 and mix ratio from G0 to GR20, the maximum initial value was observed for the G0 mix (maximum). GR16 was the lowest among the mix, with 155 For the A/B ratio of 0.3 and mix ratio from G0 to GR20, the maximum initial value was observed for the G0 mix (maximum). GR16 was the lowest among the mix, with 155 min and 375 min, respectively. The final setting observed an A/B ratio of 0.3 for the Polymers 2022, 14, 2434 7 of 28 G0 mix (maximum), and GR16 was the lowest among the mix with 80 min and 24 min, respectively. For the A/B ratio of 0.4 and mix ratio from G0 to GR20, the maximum initial values observed for the G0 mix (maximum) and GR16 were the lowest among the mix, with 120 min and 325 min, respectively. With an A/B ratio, 0.3 final settings were observed for the G0 mix (maximum), and GR16 was the lowest among the mix with 75 min and 22 min, respectively. For the A/B ratio of 0.5 and mix ratio from G0 to GR20, the maximum initial value and the final setting were observed for the G0 mix (maximum), and GR16 was the lowest among the mix with 120 min and 350 min, respectively. With an A/B ratio of 0.3, final settings were observed for the G0 mix (maximum), and GR16 was the lowest among the mix, with 64 min and 20 min, respectively. As the A/B ratio increased from 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5, it was observed that the setting time decreased. The A/B ratio of 0.30 showed the maximum setting time compared with other ratios.

Soundness Test
Soundness tests were carried out as per IS: 4031-PART code. Le Chatelier's method was used to determine the soundness of geopolymer paste at a room temperature of 29 • C. The soundness results for various A/B ratios of 0.30, 0.40, and 0.50 for KOH and K 2 SiO 3 as activator agents shown in Figure 4. As the A/B ratio increases, the soundness also increases. A/B ratio of 0.50 shows maximum soundness compared with other ratios. GR19 is the sample for which maximum soundness of 9 mm was observed. GR19 has a maximum RM%, compared with other proportions.
Polymers 2022, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 28 min and 375 min, respectively. The final setting observed an A/B ratio of 0.3 for the G0 mix (maximum), and GR16 was the lowest among the mix with 80 min and 24 min, respectively. For the A/B ratio of 0.4 and mix ratio from G0 to GR20, the maximum initial values observed for the G0 mix (maximum) and GR16 were the lowest among the mix, with 120 min and 325 min, respectively. With an A/B ratio, 0.3 final settings were observed for the G0 mix (maximum), and GR16 was the lowest among the mix with 75 min and 22 min, respectively. For the A/B ratio of 0.5 and mix ratio from G0 to GR20, the maximum initial value and the final setting were observed for the G0 mix (maximum), and GR16 was the lowest among the mix with 120 min and 350 min, respectively. With an A/B ratio of 0.3, final settings were observed for the G0 mix (maximum), and GR16 was the lowest among the mix, with 64 min and 20 min, respectively. As the A/B ratio increased from 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5, it was observed that the setting time decreased. The A/B ratio of 0.30 showed the maximum setting time compared with other ratios.

Soundness Test
Soundness tests were carried out as per IS: 4031-PART code. Le Chatelier's method was used to determine the soundness of geopolymer paste at a room temperature of 29 °C. The soundness results for various A/B ratios of 0.30, 0.40, and 0.50 for KOH and K2SiO3 as activator agents shown in Figure 4. As the A/B ratio increases, the soundness also increases. A/B ratio of 0.50 shows maximum soundness compared with other ratios. GR19 is the sample for which maximum soundness of 9 mm was observed. GR19 has a maximum RM%, compared with other proportions. For GR1 with A/B ratios of 0.30, it is recorded as minimum soundness. Expansion might have been caused by the development of reaction chemicals such as ettringite and gypsum. However, because the raw materials include more pozzolana, the available lime and magnesia are utilized in chemical reactions, making the binder sound. The soundness of cementitious materials shall not exceed 10 mm, according to Indian norms. For GR1 with A/B ratios of 0.30, it is recorded as minimum soundness. Expansion might have been caused by the development of reaction chemicals such as ettringite and gypsum. However, because the raw materials include more pozzolana, the available lime and magnesia are utilized in chemical reactions, making the binder sound. The soundness of cementitious materials shall not exceed 10 mm, according to Indian norms. As a result, the FA-GGBS-based geopolymers satisfy the soundness criteria of cementitious materials [12,17,25].

Workability
The workability of GPC with river sand was measured by workability as per IS 1199. Workability factors such as slump (SV), compaction factor (CF), and vee-bee consistometer (VBC) for different proportions of red mud along with various A/B ratios were tested; results are shown in Figure 5. As a result, the FA-GGBS-based geopolymers satisfy the soundness criteria of cementitious materials [12,17,25].

Workability
The workability of GPC with river sand was measured by workability as per IS 1199. Workability factors such as slump (SV), compaction factor (CF), and vee-bee consistometer (VBC) for different proportions of red mud along with various A/B ratios were tested; results are shown in Figure 5. The SV was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of slump observed was from 34 to 78 mm for various design mixes, represented in Figure 5a for KOH and K2SiO3 activator agents. For G0, maximum SV was observed at 78 mm, and for GR20 mix, minimum SV was observed at 34 mm for an A/B ratio of 0.30. For the A/B ratio of 0.40, maximum SV was observed as 73 mm for G0, and the minimum was 37 mm for GR20. For the A/B ratio of 0.50, maximum SV was observed as 68 mm for G0, and minimum SV was observed as 34 mm for GR20. As the A/B ratio increased from 0.3 to 0.4 and 0.4 to 0.5, the SV reduced. As the RM content increased, the SV also decreased. The CF was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of CF observed was from 0.66 to 0.92 for various design mixes.
From Figure 5b, G0, maximum CF was observed at 0.92, and GR20 mix minimum CF was observed at 0.69 for an A/B ratio of 0.30. For the A/B ratio of 0.40 maximum, CF was observed as 0.91 for G0 and minimum CF was observed as 0.68 for GR20. For the A/B ratio, 0.50 maximum CF was observed as 0.90 for G0 and minimum CF was observed as 0.66 for GR20. As the A/B ratio increased from 0.3 to 0.4 and 0.4 to 0.5, the CF decreased. As the RM content increased, the CF also decreased. The VBC was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of VBC observed was from 8 s to 25 s for various design mixes. From Figure 5c, G0, maximum VBC was observed at 15 s, and GR20 mix minimum VBC was observed within 8 s for an A/B ratio of 0.30. For an A/B ratio of 0.30 maximum, VBC was observed as 9 s for G0 and minimum VBC was observed as 21 s for GR20. For an A/B ratio of 0.50 maximum, VBC was observed as 12 s for G0 and minimum VBC was observed as 25 s for GR20. As the A/B ratio increased from 0.3 to 0.4 and 0.4 to 0.5, the CF decreased. As the RM content increased, the CF also decreased.
In comparison to GGBS, RM contains silica and alumina content and has a low heat of hydration, but GGBS has a higher rate of hydration than fly ash, i.e., higher reactivity [33,34]. The shape of particles has a more significant influence on the workability of GPC, insofar as FA particles are spherical. In contrast, GGBS has angular particle shapes, and the larger surface area and high porosity of the rich content of silica-based ingredients are the two factors affecting workability [35,36]. The high amount of amorphous sil- The SV was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of slump observed was from 34 to 78 mm for various design mixes, represented in Figure 5a for KOH and K 2 SiO 3 activator agents. For G0, maximum SV was observed at 78 mm, and for GR20 mix, minimum SV was observed at 34 mm for an A/B ratio of 0.30. For the A/B ratio of 0.40, maximum SV was observed as 73 mm for G0, and the minimum was 37 mm for GR20. For the A/B ratio of 0.50, maximum SV was observed as 68 mm for G0, and minimum SV was observed as 34 mm for GR20. As the A/B ratio increased from 0.3 to 0.4 and 0.4 to 0.5, the SV reduced. As the RM content increased, the SV also decreased. The CF was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of CF observed was from 0.66 to 0.92 for various design mixes.
From Figure 5b, G0, maximum CF was observed at 0.92, and GR20 mix minimum CF was observed at 0.69 for an A/B ratio of 0.30. For the A/B ratio of 0.40 maximum, CF was observed as 0.91 for G0 and minimum CF was observed as 0.68 for GR20. For the A/B ratio, 0.50 maximum CF was observed as 0.90 for G0 and minimum CF was observed as 0.66 for GR20. As the A/B ratio increased from 0.3 to 0.4 and 0.4 to 0.5, the CF decreased. As the RM content increased, the CF also decreased. The VBC was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of VBC observed was from 8 s to 25 s for various design mixes. From Figure 5c, G0, maximum VBC was observed at 15 s, and GR20 mix minimum VBC was observed within 8 s for an A/B ratio of 0.30. For an A/B ratio of 0.30 maximum, VBC was observed as 9 s for G0 and minimum VBC was observed as 21 s for GR20. For an A/B ratio of 0.50 maximum, VBC was observed as 12 s for G0 and minimum VBC was observed as 25 s for GR20. As the A/B ratio increased from 0.3 to 0.4 and 0.4 to 0.5, the CF decreased. As the RM content increased, the CF also decreased.
In comparison to GGBS, RM contains silica and alumina content and has a low heat of hydration, but GGBS has a higher rate of hydration than fly ash, i.e., higher reactivity [33,34]. The shape of particles has a more significant influence on the workability of GPC, insofar as FA particles are spherical. In contrast, GGBS has angular particle shapes, and the larger surface area and high porosity of the rich content of silica-based ingredients are the two factors affecting workability [35,36]. The high amount of amorphous silica with porous structured particles in geopolymer paste increases the specific surface area leading to better reactivity [37,38]. GGBS-based GPC, with increasing fly ash content, increasing the slump and delaying polymerization, was reported after the addition of corncob ash, which is rich in silica content and has a higher specific surface area than GGBS, causing increases in SV [39,40]. The lower water-to-binder ratio was higher in GPC. However, the water content was not sufficient for the reaction, leading to a reduction in the slump. The irregular size and shape of the particle had misled rheology and was distinctive of GPC [12,41]. The ratio of Na 2 SiO 3 to NaOH increased and then decreased the slump value in lightweight GPC due to the high viscosity of Na 2 SiO 3 , which reduced the flow of mixtures. The aggregate shapes also affected the workability [42,43]. The use of saturated surface dry aggregate led to higher workability. The water inside concrete aggregate was available for a reaction and unreacted particles, leading to increased polymerization [44,45]. area leading to better reactivity [37,38]. GGBS-based GPC, with increasing fly ash content, increasing the slump and delaying polymerization, was reported after the addition of corncob ash, which is rich in silica content and has a higher specific surface area than GGBS, causing increases in SV [39,40]. The lower water-to-binder ratio was higher in GPC. However, the water content was not sufficient for the reaction, leading to a reduction in the slump. The irregular size and shape of the particle had misled rheology and was distinctive of GPC [12,41]. The ratio of Na2SiO3 to NaOH increased and then decreased the slump value in lightweight GPC due to the high viscosity of Na2SiO3, which reduced the flow of mixtures. The aggregate shapes also affected the workability [42,43]. The use of saturated surface dry aggregate led to higher workability. The water inside concrete aggregate was available for a reaction and unreacted particles, leading to increased polymerization [44,45].

Hardened Properties of Geopolymer
The compressive strength (CS) test was conducted as per IS 516 code with a 150 mm cube specimen tested at a compression testing machine. The CS valves for various design mixes of geopolymer concrete for the 7, 14, 28, and 90 days are shown in Figure 6ac. We obtained results from the CS valve for the GPC-GR series on the 7, 14, 28, and 90 days of testing at ambient condition. The CS was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of CS observed was from 31 to 48.45 MPa for various design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.30 represented in Figure 6a for KOH and K2SiO3 activator agents.
For day 7, maximum CS was observed at 47 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 31 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 14, maximum CS was observed at 47.25 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 31.5 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 28, maximum CS was observed at 48.10 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 32 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 90, maximum CS was observed at 48.45 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 33.16 MPa for the GR20 mix. The CS was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of CS observed was from 32 to 48.93 MPa for various design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.40 represented in Figure 6b. For day 7, maximum CS was observed at 46.9 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 32 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 14, maximum CS was observed at 47.79 MPa for the GR6 mixes, and minimum CS was observed at 33 MPa for the GR20 mixes. For day 28, maximum CS was observed at 48.79 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 33.9 MPa for the GR20 mixes. For day 90, maximum CS was observed at 48.93 MPa for the GR6 mixes, and minimum CS was observed at 34.01 MPa for the GR20 mixes.
The CS was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of CS observed was from 30.1 to 47.12 MPa for various design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.50 represented in Figure 6c. For day 7, maximum CS was observed at 45.91 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 30.1 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 14, maximum CS was observed at 46.26 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 31 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 28, maximum CS was observed at 46.86 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 31.05 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 90, maximum CS was observed at 47.12 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 31.95 MPa for the GR20 mix. As the percentage of RM increased up to 12%, the CS was found to be at maximum; beyond 12%, the CS declined. The optimum dosage of We obtained results from the CS valve for the GPC-GR series on the 7, 14, 28, and 90 days of testing at ambient condition. The CS was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of CS observed was from 31 to 48.45 MPa for various design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.30 represented in Figure 6a for KOH and K 2 SiO 3 activator agents.
For day 7, maximum CS was observed at 47 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 31 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 14, maximum CS was observed at 47.25 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 31.5 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 28, maximum CS was observed at 48.10 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 32 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 90, maximum CS was observed at 48.45 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 33.16 MPa for the GR20 mix. The CS was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of CS observed was from 32 to 48.93 MPa for various design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.40 represented in Figure 6b. For day 7, maximum CS was observed at 46.9 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 32 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 14, maximum CS was observed at 47.79 MPa for the GR6 mixes, and minimum CS was observed at 33 MPa for the GR20 mixes. For day 28, maximum CS was observed at 48.79 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 33.9 MPa for the GR20 mixes. For day 90, maximum CS was observed at 48.93 MPa for the GR6 mixes, and minimum CS was observed at 34.01 MPa for the GR20 mixes.
The CS was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of CS observed was from 30.1 to 47.12 MPa for various design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.50 represented in Figure 6c. For day 7, maximum CS was observed at 45.91 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 30.1 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 14, maximum CS was observed at 46.26 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 31 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 28, maximum CS was observed at 46.86 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 31.05 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 90, maximum CS was observed at 47.12 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum CS was observed at 31.95 MPa for the GR20 mix. As the percentage of RM increased up to 12%, the CS was found to be at maximum; beyond 12%, the CS declined. The optimum dosage of RM of 12% maximum CS was observed for 7, 14, 28, and 90 days for an A/B ratio of 0.40. For various ratios of A/B, the 0.40 shows higher results than other ratios.
The GGBS is the majority content among other binding materials. The GGBS has higher specific surface areas, which tend to have a higher heat of hydration, which helps to gain the strength of concrete [24,[46][47][48]. It is observed that CS reduces beyond RM 12% after addition in GPC. Na 2 SiO 3 solution as an alkaline solution result in more silica gel from GGBS and RM subsidizes denser Si-O-Si bonds during polymerization [49][50][51]. However, the Si-O-Al bond is considerably more resilient than Si-O-Si and Al bonds, leading to higher compressive strength [52][53][54]. NaOH solution detaches the silica and alumina present in the mixture as binding agents, endorses the monomer bond structure, and enhances the geopolymerization process. Si/Al ratio is 2, higher CS is achieved, and Si/Al ratio is beyond 4.17 [18,55,56]. The reduction in compressive strength of silica-rich materials adversely affects the matrix structure of the geopolymer composite, which causes the formation of silica gel to be hindered-excess of silicate delays evaporation of water during the polycondensation process [57][58][59]. GGBS content is increased in GPC. The CS also increases due to the aluminosilicate glassy nature of GGBS. When it reacts with alkaline activators and is dissolved in it, and calcium content increases in GPC, it increases the strength and reduces the rate of workability [60][61][62]. RM substitution with GWS in minimal amounts improves cement particle dispersion in the mix, resulting in improved cement reactions and, ultimately, increases in strength and other concrete properties [10,59,63]. The GWS increase in reactive phases implies that the alkali fusion process resulted in physicochemical changes such as the breakage of specific crystal structures and the liberation of silica and alumina, which enhanced reactivity, leading to increased CS [48,64,65]. Compressive strength dropped as the K/Al ratio increased. The exception was a local maximum at a K/Al ratio of one, significant at laboratory temperature and after 200 • C exposure. The local maximum dropped with increasing exposure temperatures, and it was no longer visible between 1000 • C and 1200 • C. The pattern of increasing compressive strength was followed by a decline with increasing Na/Al ratios [66][67][68]. The presence of silica and free lime in the RM, which enhances C-A-S-H gel formation, is the foundation for increased strength achievement. With a high degree of RM replacement, an incomplete geopolymeric reaction was discovered; due to insufficient alkaline content, the geopolymer concrete strength was reduced because the presence of dissolved "Si" and "Al" created more sodium aluminosilicate gel [66][67][68].

Split Tensile Strength and Flexural Strength
The split tensile strength (STS) test was conducted as per IS 5816 code in a compression testing machine with a 150 × 300 mm 2 cylinder specimen. The STS valves for various design mixes of geopolymer concrete for the 7, 14, 28, and 90 days are shown in Figure 7a-c for KOH and K 2 SiO 3 activator agents.
We obtained results from the STS valve for the GPC-GR series on the 7, 14, 28, and 90 days of testing at ambient condition. The STS observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series ranged from 3.1 to 5.48 MPa for various design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.30 represented in Figure 7a. For day 7, maximum STS was observed at 4.5 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 3.1 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 14, maximum STS was observed at 5.16 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 3.5 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 28, maximum STS was observed at 5.39 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 3.8 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 90, maximum STS was observed at 5.49 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 4.1 MPa for the GR20 mix. We obtained results from the STS valve for the GPC-GR series on the 7, 14, 28, and 90 days of testing at ambient condition. The STS observed during experimentation fo various GPC-GR series ranged from 3.1 to 5.48 MPa for various design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.30 represented in Figure 7a. For day 7, maximum STS was observed at 4.5 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 3.1 MPa for the GR20 mix The STS observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series ranged from 3.4 to 5.39 MPa for various design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.40 represented in Figure 7b. For day 7, maximum STS was observed at 4.91 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 3.4 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 14, maximum STS was observed at 5.06 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 3.5 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 28, maximum STS was observed at 5.27 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 3.7 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 90, maximum STS was observed at 5.39 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 3.8 MPa for the GR20 mix.
The STS observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series ranged from 3.1 to 5.12 MPa for various design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.50 represented in Figure 7c. For day 7, maximum STS was observed at 4.66 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 3.1 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 14, maximum STS was observed at 4.87 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 3.4 MPa for the GR20 mixes. For day 28, maximum STS was observed at 5.02 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 3.5 MPa for the GR20 mixes. For day 90, maximum STS was observed at 5.12 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 3.6 MPa for the GR20 mixes. As the percentage of RM increased up to 20%, the STS was found to be at maximum; beyond 20%, the STS declined. The optimum dosage of RM of 20% maximum STS was observed for 7, 14, 28, and 90 days, for an A/B ratio of 0.40. For various ratios of A/B, the 0.40 shows remarkable results compared with other ratios.
The flexural strength (FS) test was conducted as per IS 516 code in a compression testing machine with a beam mold (10 × 10 × 50) cm 3 specimen. The FS valves for various design mixes of geopolymer concrete for the 7, 14, 28, and 90 days are shown in Figure 8a-c. We obtained results from the FS valve for the GPC-GR series on the 7, 14, 28, and 90 days of testing at ambient conditions. The FS was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of FS observed was from 4.1 to 6.14 MPa for various design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.30 represented in Figure 8a. at 5.06 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 3.5 mix. For day 28, maximum STS was observed at 5.27 MPa for the GR mum STS was observed at 3.7 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 90, max served at 5.39 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum STS was observed GR20 mix.
The STS observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR s 3.1 to 5.12 MPa for various design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.50 rep 7c. For day 7, maximum STS was observed at 4.66 MPa for the GR10 m STS was observed at 3.1 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 14, maximum at 4.87 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 3.4 mixes. For day 28, maximum STS was observed at 5.02 MPa for the G imum STS was observed at 3.5 MPa for the GR20 mixes. For day 90, m observed at 5.12 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum STS was obser the GR20 mixes. As the percentage of RM increased up to 20%, the ST at maximum; beyond 20%, the STS declined. The optimum dosage of mum STS was observed for 7, 14, 28, and 90 days, for an A/B ratio of 0 tios of A/B, the 0.40 shows remarkable results compared with other rat The flexural strength (FS) test was conducted as per IS 516 code testing machine with a beam mold (10 × 10 × 50) cm³ specimen. The FS design mixes of geopolymer concrete for the 7, 14, 28, and 90 days ar 8a-c. We obtained results from the FS valve for the GPC-GR series on 90 days of testing at ambient conditions. The FS was observed durin for various GPC-GR series; the range of FS observed was from 4.1 to ous design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.30 represented in Figure 8a. For day 7, maximum FS was observed at 5.58 MPa for the GR10 FS was observed at 4.1 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 14, maximum 5.73 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum FS was observed at 4.3 MP For day 28, maximum FS was observed at 6.03 MPa for the GR10 mix was observed at 4.5 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 90, maximum F 6.14 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum FS was observed at 4.6 MP The FS was observed during experimentation for various GPC-G of FS observed was from 4.8 to 6.97 MPa for various design mixes, w 0.40 represented in Figure 8b. For day 7, maximum FS was observed For day 7, maximum FS was observed at 5.58 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum FS was observed at 4.1 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 14, maximum FS was observed at 5.73 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum FS was observed at 4.3 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 28, maximum FS was observed at 6.03 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum FS was observed at 4.5 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 90, maximum FS was observed at 6.14 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum FS was observed at 4.6 MPa for the GR20 mix.
The FS was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of FS observed was from 4.8 to 6.97 MPa for various design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.40 represented in Figure 8b. For day 7, maximum FS was observed at 6.36 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum FS was observed at 4.8 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 14, maximum FS was observed at 6.67 MPa for the GR10 mixes, and minimum FS was observed at 4.95 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 28, maximum FS was observed at 6.88 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum FS was observed at 5.1 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 90, maximum FS was observed at 6.97 MPa for the GR6 mix, and minimum STS was observed at 5.25 MPa for the GR20 mix.
The FS was observed during experimentation for various GPC-GR series; the range of FS observed was from 4.7 to 6.49 MPa for various design mixes, with an A/B ratio of 0.50 represented in Figure 8c. For day 7, maximum FS was observed at 6.26 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum FS was observed at 4.7 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 14, maximum FS was observed at 6.35 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum FS was observed at 4.8 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 28, maximum FS was observed at 6.4 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum FS was observed at 4.9 MPa for the GR20 mix. For day 90, maximum FS was observed at 6.49 MPa for the GR10 mix, and minimum FS was observed at 5.01 MPa for the GR20 mix. As the percentage of RM increased up to 20%, the FS was found to be at maximum; beyond 20%, the STS declined. The optimum dosage of RM of 20% maximum FS was observed for 7, 14, 28, and 90 days for an A/B ratio of 0.40. For various ratios of A/B, the 0.40 shows higher results than other ratios.
The size, shape, and type of aggregate, the bond between binding agent and aggregate, and the bonding strength of geopolymer gel play a significant role in developing the split strength [7,[69][70][71]. It was reported that the binding strength of geopolymer gel is interrelated with the high level of dissolution of aluminosilicates in alkaline agent presences, leading to increased geopolymerization. The solubility rate is different for GGBS and other silica-content-rich ingredients. The RM, up to 18% in the overall mix, leads to an increase in STS. Beyond 18%, there is external impurity in the granite dust, reducing strength [47,52,72]. With increasing K/Al ratios, compressive and flexural strength and modulus of elasticity dropped. The exception was the local maximum at K/Al ratio 1, which was most visible at laboratory and 200 • C temperatures. Compressive strength testing in situ was not comparable to compressive strength testing after exposure to increased temperatures, which followed a diminishing course with increasing temperature. From 600 • C, the compressive strength values measured in situ began to grow. The average pore width grew marginally with increasing potassium concentration in the laboratory and at raised temperatures up to 800 • C, but fell dramatically from 1000 • C to 1200 • C. The effect of the K/Al ratio on total pore volume was not statistically significant [53,56,73,74].
The interlocking between binding agent and aggregate was insufficient and resulted in earlier decreases in strength. GGBS was partially replaced with rice husk ash. After experimentation, the maximum tensile strength observed was 7.33 MPa at 90 days for 15% rice husk ash. It was reported that the appearance of fractures in a matrix is most likely due to the escape of free water that did not participate in the reaction [47,[73][74][75]. With increased Na content, fractures in GPC were reduced. This might be due to a more soluble silicate phase (with increased Na concentration) that functioned as a filler and was dried into fractures, reducing porosity. The existence of multiple crystalline mineral phases, particle size distribution, and form of RM particles-these all parameters may contribute to the microstructures variability [42,76,77]. Geopolymerization has been demonstrated to occur at the surface of aluminosilicate particles. As the molar concentration increases, the FS increases for ambient curing conditions. A more viscous activator agent results in a decrease in the unreacted particle of GGBS in the matrix [19,54,78]. Due to this, there is strong bond development between silica and alumina ions. K 2 SiO 3 /KOH ratio is decreased, making sodium silicate less viscous than sodium hydroxide when decreased, resulting in the decrement of FS [79,80].

Water Absorption and Bulk Density
The water absorption (WA) test for GPC was carried out as per the c1585 code. GPC prepared with an A/B ratio of 0.40 had slightly higher WA than 0.30 and 0.40. GR20 had maximum WA with 20.5%, 20.9%, and 20.8% for A/B ratio of 0.30, 0.40, and 0.50, respectively. GR8 had minimum WA with 17.5%, 17.9%, and 17.6% for A/B ratio of 0.30, 0.40, and 0.50, respectively, as shown in Figure 9a. Bulk density (BD) of GPC was in the range of 24.1 to 26.4 g/cc. GR20 had maximum WA with 25.6%, 26.4%, and 26.4% for A/B ratio of 0.30, 0.40, and 0.50, respectively. GR8 had minimum WA with 24.1%, 24.3%, and 24.5% for A/B ratios of 0.30, 0.40, and 0.50, respectively, as shown in Figure 9b for KOH and K 2 SiO 3 activator agents. The enhancement in GPC properties is a cause of the increasing alkaline-to-binder (A/B) ratio. The increase in the A/B ratio increases the content of Si because the activator contained sodium silicate, which led to an enhancement in the SiO2/Al2O3 in the matrix and made Si-O-Si bonds stronger. This results in a denser matrix of GPC being achieved [81][82][83]. Water ejected from the geopolymer matrix during heat curing creates discontinuous nanopores inside the matrix, increasing geopolymer strength. However, not all moisture will be evacuated from the geopolymer matrix, especially in bigger specimens. Large specimens with higher surface tensions tend to release retained moisture slower than smaller ones. The most likely source of temperature resistance variation related to size is a mixture of these two tendencies. After 400 °C exposure, the Na-based fly ash geopolymer showed more weight loss in TGA and a more prominent DTA peak at The enhancement in GPC properties is a cause of the increasing alkaline-to-binder (A/B) ratio. The increase in the A/B ratio increases the content of Si because the activator contained sodium silicate, which led to an enhancement in the SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 in the matrix and made Si-O-Si bonds stronger. This results in a denser matrix of GPC being achieved [81][82][83]. Water ejected from the geopolymer matrix during heat curing creates discontinuous nanopores inside the matrix, increasing geopolymer strength. However, not all moisture will be evacuated from the geopolymer matrix, especially in bigger specimens.
Large specimens with higher surface tensions tend to release retained moisture slower than smaller ones. The most likely source of temperature resistance variation related to size is a mixture of these two tendencies. After 400 • C exposure, the Na-based fly ash geopolymer showed more weight loss in TGA and a more prominent DTA peak at around 100 • C than its K-based counterpart. The higher weight loss and DTA peak are associated with the loss of absorbed and combined water in geopolymer gels, indicating that more geopolymer gels are retained in the Na-based geopolymer after 400 • C exposure than in the K-based system, which is consistent with the observed compressive strength results. After being exposed to 800 • C, the tendency reverses.

Modulus of Elasticity (MoE)
The MoE test was performed according to IS 516 codes. Geopolymer cylinders were cast with the dimension of 150 mm in diameter and 300 mm in length for KOH and K 2 SiO 3 activator agents. Figure 10  sure than in the K-based system, which is consistent with the observed compressive strength results. After being exposed to 800 °C, the tendency reverses.

Modulus of Elasticity (MoE)
The MoE test was performed according to IS 516 codes. Geopolymer cylinders were cast with the dimension of 150 mm in diameter and 300 mm in length for KOH and K₂SiO₃ activator agents. Figure 10   From Figure 10, it is clear that testing days have only a significant impact on the strength development of MoE. At 90 days of testing MoE, strength increment is less than 2% compared with other days of testing. Several factors influence the MoE of GPC, including the kind of binder used, the casting procedure, the type of activator used, the curing condition and temperature, etc. The implementation of the mix design approach has increased MoE [79,83]. Additionally, varying viscosities and alkaline silicates of different cations may impact processes throughout the geopolymerization process, resulting in diverse microstructures and mechanical properties. The microstructure of GPC materials made with potassium silicate was much denser (less porous) than that of sodium silicate matrixes [54,84] From Figure 10, it is clear that testing days have only a significant impact on the strength development of MoE. At 90 days of testing MoE, strength increment is less than 2% compared with other days of testing. Several factors influence the MoE of GPC, including the kind of binder used, the casting procedure, the type of activator used, the curing condition and temperature, etc. The implementation of the mix design approach has increased MoE [79,83]. Additionally, varying viscosities and alkaline silicates of different cations may impact processes throughout the geopolymerization process, resulting in diverse microstructures and mechanical properties. The microstructure of GPC materials made with potassium silicate was much denser (less porous) than that of sodium silicate matrixes [54,84] The A/B ratio of 0.50 shows maximum impact value compared with other ratios. GR19 is the sample for which the maximum impact value of 1952 Nm was observed. From G0 to GR15, impact values showed an incremental relationship, but from GR16 to GR19, the impact value had very few marginal increments. GR19 had a maximum RM% compared with other proportions. For GR1 with A/B ratios of 0.30, it was recorded as a minimum. Cylindrical specimens were cast with a diameter of 50 mm and a length of 150 mm to study impact resistance. Impact resistance was studied using the dropping weight method. This entailed the following: dropping weight of 3 kg ball made up of steel with a height fall of 457 mm. The following equation was used in the computation of impact energy (Nm): E = N * m * g * h, wherein, N is the number of strikes that cause the specimen to fall, m is the weight of the steel ball, h is the freely falling height of the ball, and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

ANOVA
A/B ratio of 0.40 shows excellent CS results in all testing days from 7 to 90 days compared with other ratios. Figure 12 shows a one-way ANOVA analysis for CS results. The homogeneity of variance test used the Levene test for absolute deviation as the probability factor was 0.97156 for day 7 tested results. Similarly, the probability factor was 0.9919, 0.9879, and 0.9939 for 14, 28, and 90 days of testing, respectively. The Tukey test for CS results was used; the probability number obtained in ANOVA variation was 0.9067 for GPC tested for 7 days. The A/B ratio of 0.50 shows maximum impact value compared with other ratios. GR19 is the sample for which the maximum impact value of 1952 Nm was observed. From G0 to GR15, impact values showed an incremental relationship, but from GR16 to GR19, the impact value had very few marginal increments. GR19 had a maximum RM% compared with other proportions. For GR1 with A/B ratios of 0.30, it was recorded as a minimum. Cylindrical specimens were cast with a diameter of 50 mm and a length of 150 mm to study impact resistance. Impact resistance was studied using the dropping weight method. This entailed the following: dropping weight of 3 kg ball made up of steel with a height fall of 457 mm. The following equation was used in the computation of impact energy (Nm): E = N * m * g * h, wherein, N is the number of strikes that cause the specimen to fall, m is the weight of the steel ball, h is the freely falling height of the ball, and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

ANOVA
A/B ratio of 0.40 shows excellent CS results in all testing days from 7 to 90 days compared with other ratios. Figure 12 shows a one-way ANOVA analysis for CS results. The homogeneity of variance test used the Levene test for absolute deviation as the probability factor was 0.97156 for day 7 tested results. Similarly, the probability factor was 0.9919, 0.9879, and 0.9939 for 14, 28, and 90 days of testing, respectively. The Tukey test for CS results was used; the probability number obtained in ANOVA variation was 0.9067 for GPC tested for 7 days. Similarly, the probability factor was 0.9067, 0.7676, and 0.9069 for 14, 28, and 90 days of testing, respectively. Levene and Tukey′s variation analysis showed an average probability of 92%, which indicates that the CS results line varies linearly. For an A/B ratio of 0.40, results show that CS results vary linearly for a testing period of 7 to 90 days. As the curing days progressed, the CS strength also increased. A 2 to 3% increment of CS value was observed from 7 to 14 days of testing for an A/B ratio of 0.40. For 28 and 90 days of testing, the variation of CS results for A/B ratios was 1 to 1.5% increment. The presence of RM as the binder in GPC showed incremental CS results, but for specimens tested for 28 and 90 days, the CS value increment was only marginal. Figure 13 shows the radar plot in line pattern (a) and area plot (b). GR6 shows the maximum CS value among all the mixes for an A/B ratio of 0.40 (refer to Figure 13b). Similarly, the probability factor was 0.9067, 0.7676, and 0.9069 for 14, 28, and 90 days of testing, respectively. Levene and Tukey s variation analysis showed an average probability of 92%, which indicates that the CS results line varies linearly. For an A/B ratio of 0.40, results show that CS results vary linearly for a testing period of 7 to 90 days. As the curing days progressed, the CS strength also increased. A 2 to 3% increment of CS value was observed from 7 to 14 days of testing for an A/B ratio of 0.40. For 28 and 90 days of testing, the variation of CS results for A/B ratios was 1 to 1.5% increment. The presence of RM as the binder in GPC showed incremental CS results, but for specimens tested for 28 and 90 days, the CS value increment was only marginal. Figure 13 shows the radar plot in line pattern (a) and area plot (b). GR6 shows the maximum CS value among all the mixes for an A/B ratio of 0.40 (refer to Figure 13b).     Red color indicates various mix id used for current study, blue c cipal components scale. The compressive strength of geopolymer p based activator was stronger at ambient temperature and higher at ra up to 40 °C than its K-based counterpart. The compressive strength of taining a K-based activator is somewhat greater than its Na-based e The geopolymer paste with a K-based activator had more significant sive strength at increased temperature conditions than its Na-based e opolymer paste containing a K-based activator with a K2SiO3/KOH ra residual compressive strength at all increased temperatures than its lent.

Conclusions
The effect of temperature on the compressive strength paramete and non-destructive testing was analyzed. Some critical observation are obtained as follows.
Fresh and mechanical results showed that materials of geologica ca and alumina content enhance the performance of geopolymer con of ground granulated blast furnace (GGBS) with 12% RM showed a po geopolymerization process. The addition of activator agents such as K creased the workability of geopolymer concrete up to 78 mm. The com of geopolymer concrete increased with age. For an alkali to binder r Red color indicates various mix id used for current study, blue color indicate principal components scale. The compressive strength of geopolymer pastes using a Na-based activator was stronger at ambient temperature and higher at raised temperatures up to 40 • C than its K-based counterpart. The compressive strength of a geopolymer containing a K-based activator is somewhat greater than its Na-based equivalent at 60 • C. The geopolymer paste with a K-based activator had more significant residual compressive strength at increased temperature conditions than its Na-based equivalent. The geopolymer paste containing a K-based activator with a K 2 SiO 3 /KOH ratio of 3 had higher residual compressive strength at all increased temperatures than its Na-based equivalent.

Conclusions
The effect of temperature on the compressive strength parameter using destructive and non-destructive testing was analyzed. Some critical observations and conclusions are obtained as follows.
Fresh and mechanical results showed that materials of geological origin rich in silica and alumina content enhance the performance of geopolymer concrete. Replacement of ground granulated blast furnace (GGBS) with 12% RM showed a positive effect on the geopolymerization process. The addition of activator agents such as KOH and K 2 SiO 3 increased the workability of geopolymer concrete up to 78 mm. The compressive strength of geopolymer concrete increased with age. For an alkali to binder ratio (A/B) ratio of 0.45 and RM of 12%, maximum compressive, tensile, flexural, modulus of elasticity (MoE), and impact strength were observed. Both Levene and Tukey s variation analysis show a 92% average likelihood, indicating that the compressive strength (CS). CS results line varies linearly. The formation of calcium alumina silicate hydrate (C-A-S-H) gel was limited at greater RM replacement levels, resulting in a reduction in CS. The alkali fusion process dramatically improves the reactivity of red mud (RM) by geopolymerization. High silica and alumina-rich materials in the geopolymer result in a reduced polycondensation level of the geopolymer owing to inadequate dissolving and potential agglomeration of the materials, which has an unfavorable impact on the mechanical characteristics of the geopolymer.

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.