In Vitro Hyperthermia Evaluation of Electrospun Polymer Composite Fibers Loaded with Reduced Graphene Oxide

Electrospun meshes (EM) composed of natural and synthetic polymers with randomly or aligned fibers orientations containing 0.5% or 1% of thermally reduced graphene oxide (TrGO) were prepared by electrospinning (ES), and their hyperthermia properties were evaluated. EM loaded with and without TrGO were irradiated using near infrared radiation (NIR) at 808 nm by varying the distance and electric potential recorded at 30 s. Morphological, spectroscopic, and thermal aspects of EM samples were analyzed by using SEM-EDS, Raman and X-ray photoelectron (XPS) spectroscopies, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and NIR radiation response. We found that the composite EM made of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), natural rubber (NR), and arabic gum (AG) containing TrGO showed improved hyperthermia properties compared to EM without TrGO, reaching an average temperature range of 42–52 °C. We also found that the distribution of TrGO in the EM depends on the orientation of the fibers. These results allow infering that EM loaded with TrGO as a NIR-active thermal inducer could be an excellent candidate for hyperthermia applications in photothermal therapy.


Introduction
A composite material consists of different phases being homogeneous on a macroscopic scale and heterogeneous on a microscopic scale. These materials are basically made up of a matrix with a major proportion, which may be metallic, polymeric, or ceramic, and a reinforcement with minor proportion, which given its geometry, can be particles, fibers, or sheets.
Among reinforcing materials, carbon-based materials such as carbon nanotubes (1D) and graphene (2D) are the most used [1]. Given the structural and hybridization characteristics of graphene and its strong optical absorbance in near infrared region [2][3][4], it has been used as a photothermal agent for the in vitro and in vivo therapies in cancer treatment [5][6][7]. Different materials absorbing near infrared radiation (NIR) light to generate heat have been developed such as metallic and magnetic nanoparticles, conductive polymers, and carbon nanomaterials [8]. Graphene as a carbon nanomaterial

Synthesis of Graphene Oxide and Thermally Reduced Graphene Oxide
The synthesis of graphene oxide (GO) was carried out by adding 5 g of graphite to 100 mL of fuming HNO 3 in a refrigerated reactor at 0 • C, and the mixture was left under stirring. Then, 40 g of KClO 3 were slowly added to the mixture, and it was left to react for 22 h. Then, the mixture was poured into 1500 mL of distilled water. The solid product was washed several times with distilled water until it reached pH 7.0 and was separated by centrifugation and dried at 70 • C for 12 h. The resulting GO was thermally reduced in a MTI 1200X tube furnace under continuous flow of argon (200-500 mL/min) to obtain thermally reduced graphene oxide (TrGO). For this, an initial heating ramp of 20 • C/min was considered until reaching 200 • C. Then, a heating ramp of 10 • C/min was used between 200 and 1000 • C, kept at 1000 • C for 2 min, and then allowed to cool to room temperature.

Preparation of Electrospun Fiber Meshes by Electrospinning
Electrospun meshes (EM) were prepared in the presence and absence of TrGO (control). TrGO was loaded in the EM at concentrations of 0.5% or 1%, respectively. The choice of the two TrGO concentrations was that it is not possible to prepare suitable polymeric solutions for an ES process containing more that 1% TrGO. Concentration greater that 1% TrGO results in a poor dispersion of TrGO in the polymer fibers composite. Additionally, a higher content of TrGO require the use of high frequency and intensity ultrasound for long periods. It is known that high-power ultrasound induces a temperature elevation of the polymer solution resulting in the degradation of polymeric materials and preventing a proper ES process. Different EM (EM1-EM4) were prepared as follows: EM1 (PVA), EM2 (PVA + NR + SDS), EM3 (PVA + NR + SDS + AG), and EM4 (PVA + NR + SDS + AG + TrGO). Polymer composite fibers with different fiber orientations, random and aligned fiber topologies, were prepared using flat plate and rotating drum collectors, respectively. All EM were obtained by using the following ES parameters: the flow rate and electric potentials used for the preparation of EM were in the range of 15-19 kV and 1000-1400 µL/h, respectively. The distance of the collecting plate covered by aluminum foil from the metallic needle was varied from 15 to 18 cm. In the case of EM with aligned fibers, the rotation speed of the rotating drum was 1700 rpm (clockwise).

Hyperthermia Evaluation
The hyperthermia property of EM was evaluated varying the distance from 2 to 6 cm and electric potential from 5 to 10 V at a constant time of 30 s under 808 nm laser irradiation with a LRD-0808 Laserglow ® equipment using a thermal imager (Fluke ® TiS20, Laserglow COM Limited, Toronto, ON, Canada). All photothermal images were analyzed using a SmartView ® software.  Figure 1 shows the Raman spectra of graphite and TrGO samples. Spectrum (a) of Figure 1 corresponds to the Raman spectrum of graphite in which the graphitic band (G band), corresponding to the first order vibration mode of E 2g phonon of the sp 2 carbon atoms, appears at 1590 cm −1 . Additionally, a very small D band is observed at 1350 cm −1 , which is typically associated to the breathing modes of aromatic carbon rings. This band is attributed to the edge defect and functional groups present in the lattice of graphene materials [28,29]. The 2D band, which is the overtone of D bands is seen ca. 2700 cm −1 , while the overtone of D and D' bands, the so-called D+D' band, appears at 2920 cm −1 [30]. Spectrum (b) of Figure 1 shows a small D band at 1350 cm −1 and the G band at 1572 cm −1 of TrGO. A drastic intensity decrease of the 2D band at 2710 cm −1 was observed. This could be attributed to the order loss and increase of defects, which inhibited the overtone occurrence. Another important change is related to the drastic increase of the D band, which usually is associated to the increase of edge defects vacancies and distortions as well as the functionalities in graphene lattice. The ratio of the intensity of the G to D bands (I D /I G ) gives an indication of the degree of defects in the graphene structure. The intensity ratio of D to G bands (I D /I G ) for graphite is 0.03 (Figure 1a), while for TrGO, it is 0.89 ( Figure 1b). This fact indicates the drastic increase of the defects of the graphene lattice as a consequence of the consecutive oxidation and reduction processes in which the graphite is subjected in order to obtain TrGO [31].

Characterization of Thermally Reduced Graphene Oxide
3.1.1. Raman Spectroscopy Figure 1 shows the Raman spectra of graphite and TrGO samples. Spectrum (a) of Figure 1 corresponds to the Raman spectrum of graphite in which the graphitic band (G band), corresponding to the first order vibration mode of E2g phonon of the sp 2 carbon atoms, appears at 1590 cm −1 . Additionally, a very small D band is observed at 1350 cm −1 , which is typically associated to the breathing modes of aromatic carbon rings. This band is attributed to the edge defect and functional groups present in the lattice of graphene materials [28,29]. The 2D band, which is the overtone of D bands is seen ca. 2700 cm −1 , while the overtone of D and D' bands, the so-called D+D' band, appears at 2920 cm −1 [30]. Spectrum (b) of Figure 1 shows a small D band at 1350 cm −1 and the G band at 1572 cm −1 of TrGO. A drastic intensity decrease of the 2D band at 2710 cm −1 was observed. This could be attributed to the order loss and increase of defects, which inhibited the overtone occurrence. Another important change is related to the drastic increase of the D band, which usually is associated to the increase of edge defects vacancies and distortions as well as the functionalities in graphene lattice. The ratio of the intensity of the G to D bands (ID/IG) gives an indication of the degree of defects in the graphene structure. The intensity ratio of D to G bands (ID/IG) for graphite is 0.03 (Figure 1a), while for TrGO, it is 0.89 ( Figure 1b). This fact indicates the drastic increase of the defects of the graphene lattice as a consequence of the consecutive oxidation and reduction processes in which the graphite is subjected in order to obtain TrGO [31]. On the other hand, the broadening of the G band of TrGO as compared with the G band of the graphite indicates the random interactions of the TrGO sheets. Several researchers have reported that the thermal process facilitates the elimination of oxygenated functional groups and concomitantly favors the restoration of the long-range conjugated-π system. This fact is associated with the increase of thermal and electrical conductivity. Likewise, this long-range conjugated-π system imparts to graphene materials a stable absorption rate and absorption bandwidth in a large incident angle range in near infrared light [32]. Consequently, the use of TrGO as a filler in polymer fibers for hyperthermia applications could be considered as a valuable therapy option.
This section may be divided by subheadings. It should provide a concise and precise description of the experimental results, their interpretation, as well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn. On the other hand, the broadening of the G band of TrGO as compared with the G band of the graphite indicates the random interactions of the TrGO sheets. Several researchers have reported that the thermal process facilitates the elimination of oxygenated functional groups and concomitantly favors the restoration of the long-range conjugated-π system. This fact is associated with the increase of thermal and electrical conductivity. Likewise, this long-range conjugated-π system imparts to graphene materials a stable absorption rate and absorption bandwidth in a large incident angle range in near infrared light [32]. Consequently, the use of TrGO as a filler in polymer fibers for hyperthermia applications could be considered as a valuable therapy option.
This section may be divided by subheadings. It should provide a concise and precise description of the experimental results, their interpretation, as well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn.  Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of graphite (a) and TrGO (b) samples. A narrow and intense diffraction peak ca. 2θ = 26.3 • associated with the graphitic (002) plane is seen for graphite. By using the Bragg's law [33], the interlayer distance can be estimated, which typically is associated with the distance between graphene layers. In the case of graphite, this interlayer distance corresponds to 3.34 Å, which is consistent with values reported in the literature [29]. Conversely, the diffraction peak of TrGO is significantly wider than that of graphite and appears at 2θ = 25.4 • , corresponding to an interlayer distance of 3.51 Å.
3.1.2. X-ray Diffraction Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of graphite (a) and TrGO (b) samples. A narrow and intense diffraction peak ca. 2θ = 26.3° associated with the graphitic (002) plane is seen for graphite. By using the Bragg's law [33], the interlayer distance can be estimated, which typically is associated with the distance between graphene layers. In the case of graphite, this interlayer distance corresponds to 3.34 Å , which is consistent with values reported in the literature [29]. Conversely, the diffraction peak of TrGO is significantly wider than that of graphite and appears at 2θ = 25.4°, corresponding to an interlayer distance of 3.51 Å .
On the other hand, the crystallite size and the number of stacked layer of graphene in these materials can be determined by using the Scherrer equation [34]. In this regard, the crystallite size and the number of stacked graphene layers of TrGO were 13.6 Å and 5, respectively [35]. This is significantly lower than the values for graphite, which present a crystallite size and the number of stacked layers of 180 Å and 54, respectively. As mentioned, the (002) peak of TrGO is significantly wider than that observed for graphite. This is attributable to the partial loss of crystallinity, which is a result of the oxidation and reduction processes, where the latter causes the exfoliation of the graphene layers [36,37]. It is also worth noting that according to Bianco et al. [35], a graphene material is considered to be a material that contains up to 10 stacked layers. TrGO, which is composed of only five stacked layers, can be considered as a few-layered reduced GO. However, the interplanar distance of TrGO (3.51 Å ) is greater than that of its precursor, graphite (3.34 Å ). These results are due to a partial remanence of functional groups in TrGO.  On the other hand, the crystallite size and the number of stacked layer of graphene in these materials can be determined by using the Scherrer equation [34]. In this regard, the crystallite size and the number of stacked graphene layers of TrGO were 13.6 Å and 5, respectively [35]. This is significantly lower than the values for graphite, which present a crystallite size and the number of stacked layers of 180 Å and 54, respectively.

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
As mentioned, the (002) peak of TrGO is significantly wider than that observed for graphite. This is attributable to the partial loss of crystallinity, which is a result of the oxidation and reduction processes, where the latter causes the exfoliation of the graphene layers [36,37]. It is also worth noting that according to Bianco et al. [35], a graphene material is considered to be a material that contains up to 10 stacked layers. TrGO, which is composed of only five stacked layers, can be considered as a few-layered reduced GO. However, the interplanar distance of TrGO (3.51 Å) is greater than that of its precursor, graphite (3.34 Å). These results are due to a partial remanence of functional groups in TrGO. Although the TrGO possesses a higher content of C=C and C-C bonds that have a nonpolar character, the presence of oxygenated functional groups such as ether, alcohol, or ketone, suggests a partial affinity of TrGO with polar polymers such as PVA.

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
(a) (b) Figure 3. XPS of C 1s (a) and O 1s (b) photoelectric lines of TrGO. Table 1. O/C ratio, binding energy, assignment, and area peak of photoelectric lines in TrGO.  Figure 4e shows EM4 fibers composed of PVA, NR, and GA polymers which presented fibers with more homogeneous surface roughness than EM3 and smaller fiber diameters ranging from ≈80 nm to ≈300 nm. The presence of TrGO in this EM can be identified as dark areas that can be transversely and longitudinally distinguished along the composite aligned fibers and highlighted by the white circles in Figure 4e. At the same time, Figure 4f shows EM3 fibers composed of PVA, NR, and GA but without TrGO, as demonstrated by the absence of TrGO in the composite fibers.    Figure 4e shows EM4 fibers composed of PVA, NR, and GA polymers which presented fibers with more homogeneous surface roughness than EM3 and smaller fiber diameters ranging from ≈80 nm to ≈300 nm. The presence of TrGO in this EM can be identified as dark areas that can be transversely and longitudinally distinguished along the composite aligned fibers and highlighted by the white circles in Figure 4e. At the same time, Figure 4f shows EM3 fibers composed of PVA, NR, and GA but without TrGO, as demonstrated by the absence of TrGO in the composite fibers. Moreover, Figure 5 shows the morphology of EM2 with aligned fibers containing PVA, NR, and SDS utilized as surfactant as in EM3 and EM4, in the absence (a,c) and in the presence of TrGO (b,d). Figure 5a,c shows polymer composite fibers with rougher surface and wider diameters ranging from ≈1 to 2 µ m. In general, fibers of EM2 without beads were found. However, when the EM2 fibers were prepared in the presence of TrGO (Figure 5b,d), fibers with smoother surface and narrower diameters ranging from 180 to 300 nm were obtained. In Figure 5d, the presence of TrGO can be identified as dark areas along this composite polymer fiber, as was also shown by the white circles in Figure 4e for EM4. Moreover, Figure 5 shows the morphology of EM2 with aligned fibers containing PVA, NR, and SDS utilized as surfactant as in EM3 and EM4, in the absence (a,c) and in the presence of TrGO (b,d). Figure 5a,c shows polymer composite fibers with rougher surface and wider diameters ranging from ≈1 to 2 µm. In general, fibers of EM2 without beads were found. However, when the EM2 fibers were prepared in the presence of TrGO (Figure 5b,d), fibers with smoother surface and narrower diameters ranging from 180 to 300 nm were obtained. In Figure 5d, the presence of TrGO can be identified as dark areas along this composite polymer fiber, as was also shown by the white circles in Figure 4e for EM4.  Figure 6 shows the SEM-EDS analysis of EM4. We found a coherent elemental composition with respect to the composition of EM4 polymer composite. Thus, a high content of the carbon (66.6%) followed by aluminum (Al), oxygen (5.9%), and sulfur (0.2%) was identified. The presence of Al is due to the use of the aluminum foil to cover the surface of the rotating collector, where the fibers were deposited. The presence of sulfur is due to the use of SDS in the preparation of the fibers.    Figure 6 shows the SEM-EDS analysis of EM4. We found a coherent elemental composition with respect to the composition of EM4 polymer composite. Thus, a high content of the carbon (66.6%) followed by aluminum (Al), oxygen (5.9%), and sulfur (0.2%) was identified. The presence of Al is due to the use of the aluminum foil to cover the surface of the rotating collector, where the fibers were deposited. The presence of sulfur is due to the use of SDS in the preparation of the fibers.  Figure 6 shows the SEM-EDS analysis of EM4. We found a coherent elemental composition with respect to the composition of EM4 polymer composite. Thus, a high content of the carbon (66.6%) followed by aluminum (Al), oxygen (5.9%), and sulfur (0.2%) was identified. The presence of Al is due to the use of the aluminum foil to cover the surface of the rotating collector, where the fibers were deposited. The presence of sulfur is due to the use of SDS in the preparation of the fibers.    Figure 7 shows the X-ray diffraction analysis of the EM3 and EM4 samples. The strong peak observed for both EM at 2θ = 17.1 • corresponds to the PVA diffraction plane due to its semi-crystalline nature. Moreover, the wide peak observed at 2θ = 23.0 • could be due to the partial loss of crystallinity of PVA as well as the presence of TrGO in these fibers. The partial loss of the crystallinity could be the result of the interaction of PVA and AG through hydrogen bonding [38]. The presence of oxygenated functional groups in TrGO promotes its interaction with PVA and AG through hydrogen bonding favoring its permanence in the electrospun fibers.

X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Fibers
Polymers 2020, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 17 3.2.3. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Fibers Figure 7 shows the X-ray diffraction analysis of the EM3 and EM4 samples. The strong peak observed for both EM at 2θ = 17.1° corresponds to the PVA diffraction plane due to its semi-crystalline nature. Moreover, the wide peak observed at 2θ = 23.0° could be due to the partial loss of crystallinity of PVA as well as the presence of TrGO in these fibers. The partial loss of the crystallinity could be the result of the interaction of PVA and AG through hydrogen bonding [38]. The presence of oxygenated functional groups in TrGO promotes its interaction with PVA and AG through hydrogen bonding favoring its permanence in the electrospun fibers.

Hyperthermia Evaluation of the Electrospun Meshes
The hyperthermia evaluation was performed on EM3 and EM4 samples in the absence and presence of TrGO respectively, in order to determine the temperature they reach when irradiated with an NIR laser. Moreover, during the hyperthermia evaluation of composite fiber, the distance (2, 4, and 6 cm) and electric potential (5, 7.5, and 10 V) parameters were considered. The thermal evaluation carried out on EM3 is shown in Table 2 and those for EM4 with 0.5% TrGO and EM4 with 1% TrGO are shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. Table 2 shows that the registered thermal values recorded for EM3 were on average 19 °C, 19.4 °C, and 20.4 °C for random and 18.8 °C, 19.3 °C, and 20.1 °C for aligned composite fibers at electric potentials of 5, 7.5, and 10 V, respectively. These experimental results demonstrate that for both fiber orientations, there was no effect of electric potential or distance when the EM does not contain TrGO as an NIR-active thermal inducer.

Hyperthermia Evaluation of the Electrospun Meshes
The hyperthermia evaluation was performed on EM3 and EM4 samples in the absence and presence of TrGO respectively, in order to determine the temperature they reach when irradiated with an NIR laser. Moreover, during the hyperthermia evaluation of composite fiber, the distance (2, 4, and 6 cm) and electric potential (5, 7.5, and 10 V) parameters were considered. The thermal evaluation carried out on EM3 is shown in Table 2 and those for EM4 with 0.5% TrGO and EM4 with 1% TrGO are shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. Table 2 shows that the registered thermal values recorded for EM3 were on average 19 • C, 19.4 • C, and 20.4 • C for random and 18.8 • C, 19.3 • C, and 20.1 • C for aligned composite fibers at electric potentials of 5, 7.5, and 10 V, respectively. These experimental results demonstrate that for both fiber orientations, there was no effect of electric potential or distance when the EM does not contain TrGO as an NIR-active thermal inducer.   The average temperature was obtained from three temperature measurements. Superscripts a and b indicate EM4 with random and aligned fibers, respectively.
On the contrary, in both EM4 with random and aligned fibers containing 0.5% TrGO (Table 3), the infrared thermography shows that the thermal radiation capacity increases, reaching average thermal values from 18.3 to 37.8 • C and from 18.4 to 33 • C, respectively. We found that the recorded thermal values of random EM4 in average were 19.6, 28.9, and 33 • C for electric potentials of 5, 7.5, and 10 V, respectively, demonstrating the direct proportional effect of electric potential and that the hyperthermia was inversely proportional to distance when using 0.% TrGO as an NIR-light induced photothermal agent. In the case of EM4 with aligned fibers, we observed that the registered thermal values were on average 19.5, 26.4, and 29.2 • C for the electric potentials of 5, 7.5, and 10 V, respectively, showing that there was an increasing tendency of average temperature with the electric potential and that its values are lower compared to EM4 with random fibers orientation. Our experimental findings suggest that a random fiber orientation results in greater hyperthermia, which in turn is inversely proportional to distance.
The infrared thermography of both EM4 with random and aligned fibers containing 1% TrGO are shown in Table 4 demonstrating that EM loaded with a higher concentration of TrGO further increases the thermal infrared capacity, finding average values from 18.4 to 52.3 • C for random fibers and from 18.1 to 49.3 • C for aligned fibers, respectively. Table 4 shows that the thermal infrared values are on average 19.8, 32.3, and 43.4 • C for electric potentials of 5, 7.5, and 10 V, respectively. Again, we found a direct dependence of average temperature with electric potential values and that the hyperthermia capacity is inversely proportional to the distance when 1% TrGO was used. We also found that the registered thermal values were on average 19.2, 31.8, and 41.6 • C for the electric potentials of 5, 7.5, and 10 V, respectively. The results presented in Table 3 suggest that EM with random fiber orientation displays a greater hyperthermia capacity than polymer composite with an aligned fibers orientation. Figure 8a-d shows the thermographic images obtained from EM3 and EM4 with random and aligned fibers containing 0.5% and 1% TrGO registered at 10 V and 2 cm after NIR irradiation. Figure 8a,b shows that regardless of the irradiation conditions tested, the hyperthermia of the EM3 did not increase, always showing values of ≈21 • C. However, in the case of EM4 using two concentrations of TrGO, the recorded temperature values were much higher (Figure 8c-f), these being higher with a higher concentration of TrGO and higher with increasing the applied electric potential. On the other hand, for the EM4 of random and aligned fibers with 1% TrGO and at a high electric potential of 10 V, it was observed that there was a compromise regarding the distance to reach values of 52.3 °C at 2 cm and 48.6 °C at 2 cm, respectively, which are adequate and scarcely superior to what is required for an optimal 47 °C in vivo photothermal treatment [5]. According to the standard deviations (SD) for EM4 presented in Table 3 (4.33 and 2.26) and Table 4  On the other hand, for the EM4 of random and aligned fibers with 1% TrGO and at a high electric potential of 10 V, it was observed that there was a compromise regarding the distance to reach values of 52.3 • C at 2 cm and 48.6 • C at 2 cm, respectively, which are adequate and scarcely superior to what is required for an optimal 47 • C in vivo photothermal treatment [5].
According to the standard deviations (SD) for EM4 presented in Table 3 (4.33 and 2.26) and Table 4 (3.96 and 2.90), it is possible to establish the topology with less temperature variation between selected irradiation points. These variations were analyzed and confirmed through the statistical measure of SD. These values indicate that for EM4 loaded with 0.5% and 1% TrGO, the thermal variations are smaller in aligned fibers with respect to the random fibers.
On the other hand, Table 5 shows the averages of the thermal variation (∆T) of the infrared thermography registered for EM3 and EM4 with random fibers orientation. We found higher thermal values for EM4, and the ∆T suggests that the concentration of 1% TrGO in EM4 is essential when irradiating with NIR to promote hyperthermia. The average temperature was obtained from three temperature measurements. Superscripts a and b indicate EM4 and EM3 with random fibers orientation, respectively.
Additionally, Figure 9 shows the behavior of the ∆T obtained between the EM3 and EM4 considering only random fibers orientation with respect to the applied electric potential and distance. Our results showed that there was a decrease in ∆T as the irradiation was carried out at a greater distance with higher electric potential, which implies that the greater ∆T difference was due to the increase in the conversion of optical to thermal energy by TrGO in the EM4 at the highest electric potential. Furthermore, at different distances, a decrease in ∆T was observed, as the applied electric potential was lower.
In order to analyze the effect of fiber orientations of EM on thermal irradiation capacity, the infrared thermography for the EM4 was carried out using the higher concentration of TrGO for both topologies, that is, random and aligned fibers orientation, as is shown in the Table 6. We found that the EM4 with random fibers orientation had higher thermal values compared to aligned fibers orientation, and in general, there were lower ∆T values at smaller distances. These experimental findings show the key role of the fibers orientation in the EM as well as the electric potential and distance parameters to achieve a representative and homogeneous thermal property demonstrating the viable heat capacity and thermal conductivity of EM for hyperthermia application.
considering only random fibers orientation with respect to the applied electric potential and distance. Our results showed that there was a decrease in ΔT as the irradiation was carried out at a greater distance with higher electric potential, which implies that the greater ΔT difference was due to the increase in the conversion of optical to thermal energy by TrGO in the EM4 at the highest electric potential. Furthermore, at different distances, a decrease in ΔT was observed, as the applied electric potential was lower. In order to analyze the effect of fiber orientations of EM on thermal irradiation capacity, the infrared thermography for the EM4 was carried out using the higher concentration of TrGO for both topologies, that is, random and aligned fibers orientation, as is shown in the Table 6. We found that . Thermal variation (∆T) of the average temperature obtained in random fibers of EM3 and EM4 varying the irradiation distance and electric potential. The average temperature was obtained from three temperature measurements. Superscripts a and b indicate EM4 with random and aligned fibers orientation, respectively.
In this sense, Figure 10 shows the ∆T behavior recorded for EM4 with 1% TrGO with random and aligned fibers orientation varying the electric potential and distance parameters. In general, a decreasing behavior of the ∆T values was observed, which was limited by the different applied distances, where the proximity of the NIR laser to the EM surface favors the hyperthermia properties of TrGO, favoring the increase in ∆T as a function of electric potential, as it is reflected in distances of 2 and 6 cm, respectively. Surprisingly, we found that the ∆T behavior changed at 4 cm, so a more homogeneous character is suggested by both EM topologies, balancing the ∆T when irradiating at different applied electric potentials. In turn, at highest electric potential of 10 V, the behavior of ∆T was greater at the extremes of the distances, having a less value of 1.3 at a distance of 4 cm. distances, where the proximity of the NIR laser to the EM surface favors the hyperthermia properties of TrGO, favoring the increase in ΔT as a function of electric potential, as it is reflected in distances of 2 and 6 cm, respectively. Surprisingly, we found that the ΔT behavior changed at 4 cm, so a more homogeneous character is suggested by both EM topologies, balancing the ΔT when irradiating at different applied electric potentials. In turn, at highest electric potential of 10 V, the behavior of ΔT was greater at the extremes of the distances, having a less value of 1.3 at a distance of 4 cm.

Conclusions
Electrospun polymer composites were prepared using natural and synthetic polymers with random and aligned fibers orientations loaded with 0.5% or 1% of TrGO and their hyperthermia properties by NIR thermography changing the distances from 2 to 6 cm and electric potential from 5 to 10 V were evaluated. Raman, XPS, XRD, and SEM-EDS confirmed the preparation of TrGO, the composition of the polymer fibers composite, and the presence of TrGO along the fiber in the EMs. The number of graphene layers as well as the interplanar distance before and after the thermal reduction processes were determined through the Bragg and Scherrer equations. We found that SDS used as surfactant facilitated the formation of fibers in EM due to its surface-active property, and it also provided greater stability to the colloidal suspension of the NR latex, reducing the surface tension and facilitating the ES process. Moreover, arabic gum improved the thermal resistance of the resulting EM due to its crosslinking properties. The infrared thermography on the EM4 revealed that TrGO is an effective photothermal agent achieving a suitable EM material for its possible use in photothermal therapy. The fibers orientation, the distance of laser irradiation, and the applied electric potential during infrared thermography were crucial parameters to determine the properties of infrared thermography of polymer composite fibers. It was also confirmed that the thermography was smaller in EM composed of aligned fibers that random fibers using 0.5% and 1.0% TrGO.