Next Article in Journal
Gelatin Type A from Porcine Skin Used as Co-Initiator in a Radical Photo-Initiating System
Next Article in Special Issue
The Use of a Biopolymer Conjugate for an Eco-Friendly One-Pot Synthesis of Palladium-Platinum Alloys
Previous Article in Journal
Dispersed-Monolayer Graphene-Doped Polymer/Silica Hybrid Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) Thermal Optical Switch with Low-Power Consumption and Fast Response
Previous Article in Special Issue
Polyamide-Laccase Nanofiber Membrane for Degradation of Endocrine-Disrupting Bisphenol A, 17α-ethinylestradiol, and Triclosan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Efficiency Gas Permeability Membranes from Ethyl Cellulose Grafted with Ionic Liquids

1
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Heilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Polymeric Composition, College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Qiqihar University, Wenhua Street 42, Qiqihar 161006, China
2
Daqing Oilfield Construction Design and Research Institute, XiLing Road 32, Daqing 1637241, China
3
Daqing Petrochemical Research Center, Petrochemical Research Institute, China National Petroleum Corporation, Chengxiang Road 2, Daqing 163714, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(11), 1900; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11111900
Submission received: 5 October 2019 / Revised: 11 November 2019 / Accepted: 13 November 2019 / Published: 18 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer Materials in Environmental Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Ethyl cellulose was grafted with ionic liquids in optimal yields (62.5–64.1%) and grafting degrees (5.93–7.90%) by the esterification of the hydroxyl groups in ethyl cellulose with the carboxyl groups in ionic liquids. In IR spectra of the ethyl cellulose derivatives exhibited C=O bond stretching vibration peaks at 1760 or 1740 cm−1, confirming the formation of the ester groups and furnishing the evidence of the successful grafting of ethyl cellulose with ionic liquids. The ethyl cellulose grafted with ionic liquids could be formed into membranes by using the casting solution method. The resulting membranes exhibited good membrane forming ability and mechanical properties. The EC grafted with ionic liquids-based membranes demonstrated PCO2/PCH4 separation factors of up to 18.8, whereas the PCO2/PCH4 separation factor of 9.0 was obtained for pure EC membrane (both for CO2/CH4 mixture gas). The membranes also demonstrated an excellent gas permeability coefficient PCO2, up to 199 Barrer, which was higher than pure EC (PCO2 = 46.8 Barrer). Therefore, it can be concluded that the ionic liquids with imidazole groups are immensely useful for improving the gas separation performances of EC membranes.

1. Introduction

The separation membrane represents the core of the separation technology, and the performance of the separation membrane depends largely on the membrane material and formation process. Therefore, a good gas separation membrane material must have optimal gas permeability coefficient, separation factor, chemical stability, mechanical strength and film forming ability. The membrane materials currently used in the field of gas separation are mainly organic polymer materials, including poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) [1], polysulfone (PSF) [2], poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) [3], polyimide (PI) [4], polyetherimide (PEI) [5], cellulose acetate (CA) [6], ethyl cellulose (EC) [7], etc.
EC is a functional, non-ionic cellulose ether obtained by reacting cellulose with CH3CH2Cl [8]. EC is renewable and abundantly available. In addition, EC also has unique properties otherwise not possessed by other cellulose ethers, such as chemical stability, film forming ability and good mechanical properties. The hydroxyl groups in EC are replaced by a large number of ethyl groups, forming a typical hydrophobic cellulose. The unsubstituted hydroxyl groups are connected by hydrogen bonds to form a tight coral-like network structure, which gives EC excellent mechanical properties [9,10,11]. The non-toxic, hydrophobic, mechanical, thermoplastic and film-forming properties of EC have applications in many fields, such as food, microencapsulation, filtration and medicine [9,12]. EC has also been used as a separation membrane material [13].
As early as the 1990s, literature studies reported the preparation of ethyl cellulose membranes for separating oxygen and nitrogen [14]. S.M. Chen et al. studied the gas permeability of homogeneous [15] and porous EC membranes [16] by structural modification and solvent optimization. The O2/N2 separation factors of the homogeneous membrane reached 6.2, indicating that the EC membranes have high selectivity for O2 [15]. Although the pores supporting EC membranes are currently for oxygen/nitrogen separation, having higher gas permeability, a lower selectivity for CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 is generally observed [17]. In order to expand the further application of ethyl cellulose, modified EC films have also been prepared [18,19,20,21,22,23].
In another study, silyl ethers of ethyl cellulose were synthesized by the reaction of various chlorosilanes with the residual hydroxy groups of ethyl cellulose [19]. The PCO2/PN2 permselectivity values of the polymers were observed to be in the range of 15–19. The increased diffusion coefficients resulting from the introduction of silyl moiety in ethyl cellulose were observed for gas permeability; thus, their good separation performance for CO2 /N2 and CO2 /CH4 was discerned [19]. X.G. Li et al. prepared binary blend membranes of EC and poly (4-vinylpyridine) using a solution casting technique with chloroform as the solvent [20]. Remarkable and continuously enhanced selectivity was achieved for important gas pairs, including oxygen/nitrogen, carbon dioxide/methane and hydrogen/nitrogen with increasing poly (4-vinylpyridine) content [20]. The blends had higher gas separation factors and comparable gas permeabilities. Such behavior can be envisaged for all microscopically immiscible polymer blends and has important practical implications [20]. The membrane blend of EC and maleic anhydride end-capped poly(propylene carbonate) was reported to be difficult for actual gas separation due to unstable gas separation performance [21]. Q. Hu [22] and M. Moaddeb [23] also introduced nano-scale TiO2 or SiO2 particles into the EC membrane materials, which improved the gas selectivity of the membranes, but the improvement effect on gas permeability was not obvious.
Ionic liquids (IL) refer to a class of ionic compounds consisting of organic cations and organic (inorganic) anions at room temperature or near room temperature [24]. The current applications of ionic liquids in gas membrane technology are mainly reflected in the separation of CO2, which is mainly due to the excellent solubility and selectivity of ionic liquids towards CO2, especially in the case of ionic liquids containing functional imidazole groups [25]. Nikolaeva et al. [26]. have synthesized a new cellulose-derived poly(ionic liquid) (PIL) and characterized it for CO2 separation. The ideal CO2/N2 adsorption selectivity of poly(diallyldimethyl ammonium)-bis-(triflfluoromethylsulfonyl) imide (P (CA) (Tf2N)) was constantly below 10 bar. The mixed gas permeation test showed that the P[CA][Tf2N] based film with a 5 μm thick selection layer had twice the CO2 flux of the conventional cellulose acetate (CA). These results indicate that the modified CA with IL is a successful method to increase permeating flow and improve process stability over a higher CO2 /N2 and CO2/CH4 gas mixture concentration and pressure range.
In this study, membranes from ethyl cellulose grafted with ionic liquids with imidazole groups with high gas permeabilities and selectivities were prepared. An in-depth study of the relationship between the membrane structure and CO2 separation performance was studied subsequently.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Ethyl cellulose and ionic liquids were purchased from Chembee (Shanghai, China) and Greenchem ILs (Lanzhou, China), and were used as reactants. The ethyl cellulose we used was 45-55 MPa.s, 95% pure, and contained 5% toluene/isopropanol = 80:20. This is different from the purity and type of ethyl cellulose used in the literature, resulting in a certain deviation from the literature. Toluene and isopropanol are not plasticizers. Tetrahydrofuran was purchased from Kaitong Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Tianjin, China) and was employed after distillation. EC grafted with ionic liquids (EC-g1–EC-g4 in Scheme 1) and EC blended with ionic liquids (EC-b1–EC-b4 in Scheme 2) were prepared according to Scheme 1 and Scheme 2. The details of the synthesis procedure and analytical analysis are presented in the following sections.

2.2. Preparation of Ethyl Cellulose Grafted with 1-Carboxymethyl-3-Methylimidazolium Tetrafluoroborate (EC-g1)

Ethyl cellulose (1.45 g, 6.10 mmol), and pyridine (0.80 g, 10.12 mmol) were placed in a flask, evacuated for a 30 min, flushed with nitrogen and dissolved in THF (50 mL) at room temperature. Subsequently, 1-carboxymethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (1.20 g, 4.50 mmol) was injected dropwise, and stirred for 48 h at 65 °C. After the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, it was added to excess methanol (1000 mL) and precipitated for a week. The precipitate was concentrated by centrifugal separation and dried under vacuum to afford the desired product (1.02 g), obtained as a white solid, with a yield of 64.1%. IR (KBr, cm−1) bands were observed at 3080, 3020, 2960, 2930, 2860, 1760, 1640, 1620, 1500, 1470, 1400, 1380, 1348, 1250, 1100, 920, 890, and 620 (see Figure 1). The yield was calculated by this formula:
Yield = m s m o W u × [ d × ( W u + W I L ) + ( 1 d ) × W u ] × 100 % ,
where ms is the mass of the grafted product obtained, mo is the mass of EC added, Wu is the molecular weight of repetitive unit in EC, WIL is the molecular weight of ionic liquid, d is the grafting degree in EC and d can be calculated from Equation (7).

2.3. Preparation of Ethyl Cellulose Blended Ionic Liquids (EC-b1– EC-b4)

According to Scheme 2, ethyl cellulose (1.45 g, 6.10 mmol) was added to anhydrous ethanol (50 mL) and stirred for 12 h at room temperature. Subsequently, ionic liquids (1.20 g, 4.50 mmol) were added to the solution and stirred for 12 h at room temperature.

2.4. Preparation of Gas Separation Membranes and Mechanical Testing

The dried products were dissolved in tetrahydrofuran at room temperature for 12 h. The uniformly mixed casting solution was carefully poured on a clean glass plate and was placed at room temperature for 24 h. The thicknesses of the films were measured by a thickness gauge. Thereafter, the solution was poured evenly on a clean glass plate to genedegree the membrane. The Spin Coater was used to prepare the membrane (the Spin Coater was purchased from Shanghai Sanyan Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China; model SYSC-50). The casting membrane temperature was about 25 °C, the evaporation membrane temperature was about 25 °C, the evaporation time was 12 h, the casting thickness was about 0.5 mm and the relative humidity was 52%. The thicknesses of the membranes were measured by a thickness gauge (thickness gauge was purchased from Shanghai Liuling Instrument Factory, model was CH-1-B hand-type millimeter thickness gauge, the graduation value was 0.001mm, the measurement range was 0–1 mm and the error was about ≤0.001 mm). Mechanical properties were analyzed with a film tensile testing machine (XLW(PC)-500N, Sumspring, Jinan, China) at 25 °C.

2.5. Measurements and Calculations of the Gas Permeability Coefficient and the Separation Factor

The permeability coefficients of the mixed gases were measured by gas chromatographic method using the differential pressure gas transmission instrument (GTR-11MH type). The gas permeability coefficient P was calculated by the following, Equation (2) [27]:
P = q × K × L a × p × t ( ml cm cm - 2 s - 1 cmHg - 1 ) ,
where, q is transmission volume (mL); K is auxiliary positive coefficient (the fixed value is 2), meaning that it is the setting point instrument by factory; L is film thickness (cm); p is permeability pressure (cmHg); t is measurement time (s); and a is the area of the gas permeation film (the fixed value is 0.785 cm2).
In this experiment, the gas separation factor was calculated by the Equation (3) [27]:
α PCO 2 / PN 2 = P CO 2 P N 2 ,
α PCO 2 / PCH 4 = P CO 2 P CH 4 ,
where P CO 2 , P N 2 and P CH 4 can be calculated from Equation (2).
The diffusion coefficients (D) and the solubility coefficients (S) were calculated by the following equations [28,29]:
D = L 2 6 T ,
S = P D ,
where L and T are the amount of the thickness of the membrane and the time lag.

2.6. Analysis of the Grafting Degree in EC

The grafting degree is defined as the mass fraction of ionic liquid in EC. Using organic elemental analyzer, it was calculated by the following Equation (7) [30]:
d = 1 2 N % × M IL M N × 100 % ,
where, d is the grafting degree in EC; N% is the mass fraction of N which was determined by using elemental analyzer. N content is expressed in wt%. MIL is the molecular weight of ionic liquid and MN is the molecular weight of nitrogen element.

3. Instruments

The gas permeability was measured at 25 °C using a differential pressure gas transmission instrument (GTR-11MH type, GTR TEC Corporation, Kyoto, Japan; the test area was 0.785 cm2. The instrument test temperature was 34 °C. And the test pressure was maintained at 49 KPa. The gas was a mixed gas, the content of the two components was the same, the test pressure was 0.1 MPa. The carrier gas was H2, and the pressure was 0.5 MPa). Infrared spectra were recorded on a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Spectrum Two, PE company, Waltham, MA, USA). The content of elemental N in grafted product was measured using an organic elemental analyzer (PE2400 SERIES II CHNS/O, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).

4. Results and discussion

4.1. The Esterification of Ethyl Cellulose

Under appropriate reaction conditions, carboxyl groups in ionic liquid and hydroxyl groups in EC were reacted by esterification reaction (Scheme S1 in Supporting Information), which led to stable EC grafted with ionic liquids (Scheme 1, EC-g1–EC-g4).
Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) was used to determine the molecular structure of the grafted ethyl cellulose. As shown in Figure 1, there is a strong peak at 1760 cm−1, which was attributed to C=O bond stretching vibration of ester group generate by grafting reaction between hydroxyl groups in EC and carboxyl groups in ionic liquid. The absorption peaks at 1620 cm−1 and 1640 cm−1 can be attributed to C=N and C=C bond stretching vibration of imidazole groups in ionic liquid, correspondingly. There are two weak spectral bands at 2960 cm−1 and 2860 cm−1, which were generated by the C–H bond stretching vibration of methyl and methylene groups in EC respectively. The C–H stretching vibrations in the imidazole-based double bond in the ionic liquid appear at 3080 cm−1 and 3020 cm−1, and its C–H bending vibration also appeared at 1400 cm−1. The C–N stretching vibrations of the imidazole group are observed at 1470 cm−1, 1250 cm−1 and 1348 cm−1. The other EC derivatives (EC-g2–EC-g4) also showed the similar IR spectra (Figure S1–S3 in Supporting Information). On the basis of the observed IR spectra, it was concluded that the EC grafted with ionic liquids were synthesized successfully.
The yields of the grafted products were calculated by weighing the products after drying (Table 1, EC-g1–EC-g4). The grafting degree of the final products was determined by N element content in the grafted products. The yields and grafting degrees of the products obtained in the experiment are shown in Table 1. The yields of EC grafted with ionic liquids were about 62.5–64.1% (Table 1, 2–5). As the EC derivatives were washed by an excess methanol, the yields were moderate, and pure products were obtained. The EC grafted with ionic liquids exhibited moderate grafting degrees (Table 1, 5.93–7.90%), which showed that the ionic liquids were successfully grafted into ethyl cellulose.
In this experiment, 1000 mL methanol solution was used to wash the grafted products for a week, which lost some unreacted ethyl cellulose to the methanol solution. That resulted in a decrease in the yield of the reaction.
EC is dissolved in solvent, but it is still an agglomerated macromolecule, and some hydroxyl groups are enclosed. The ionic liquid itself has a strong polarity, which affects the progress of grafting reaction. The above reasons can lead to low grafting degrees.
Through the GPC test, we found that the pure ethyl cellulose had an average molecular weight of 1.7 × 105 and a molecular weight distribution of 2.68. The molecular weight of the grafted ethyl cellulose was lower than that of pure ethyl cellulose, and the molecular weight distribution was narrowed.

4.2. Gas Permeation Properties of Membranes

The EC and the modified EC were stirred and fully dissolved in tetrahydrofuran to achieve a uniform and transparent casting solution. The casting solutions were subsequently used to generate gas separation membranes with similar thicknesses. Overall, the materials exhibited good membrane forming abilities. In order to compare the effects of ionic liquids in the EC membranes on their carbon dioxide permselectivities, the gas separation performances for taking CO2 from CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 mixtures were tested. It can be seen from Table 2 that the CO2/CH4 separation factors (12.0–18.8) in the membranes with EC grafted or blended with ionic liquids (Table 2, 2–9) were almost two times those of the pure EC membranes. However, the PCO2/PCH4 permselectivity values of silyl ethers of ethyl cellulose were observed to be in the range of 6.0–8.7 [19]. For a CO2/N2 gas mixture, the EC membranes modified by ionic liquids improved the separation factor to 31.9 from 20.6 for the pure EC membrane (Table 2). The PCO2/PN2 permselectivity values of silyl ethers of ethyl cellulose were observed to be in the range of 15–19 [19]. Thus, it can be confirmed that the imidazole ionic liquids are useful to improve the gas separation performance of the EC based membranes. This is because the imidazolium group in the ionic liquid interacts with CO2, which promotes the penetration of CO2 gas molecules and continues to undergo adsorption regulation within the membrane, ultimately resulting in high CO2 permeability. On the other hand, CH4 belongs to a regular tetrahedral structure and a non-polar molecule, but the ionic liquids added belong to a polar substance. According to the principle of similar compatibility, the solubility of methane in the membrane is poor, which causes a low permeation of CH4. Therefore there was a high CO2/CH4 selectivity [31].
The most important feature of the grafted EC membranes (Table 2, Nos. 2–5) is not only their high separation factor (12.0–18.8), but their excellent gas permeability coefficients (61.5–199 Barrer) for CO2/CH4 mixtures gas, which is better than pure EC. For instance, EC-g4 containing a flexible ethyl spacer in the ionic liquid exhibited the highest CO2 permeability coefficient of 199 Barrer with a separation factor of 12 for CO2/CH4 mixture gas. For an CO2/N2 mixture gas, EC-g4 also demonstrated the highest PCO2 value (Table 2, 194 Barrer). In our previous study [32], the flexible silyloxyl spacers in copoly (substituted acetylene) membranes were reported to be effective in enhancing their permeability coefficients. Therefore, it can be opined that the flexible ethyl spacer between imidazole and ester groups (EC-g4) largely governs the motion of imidazole, which strongly affects the CO2 permeability coefficient.
The EC-g3 derivative containing bromide exhibited the highest separation factor (18.8 Barrer) with a permeability coefficient of 165 Barrer (Table 2, No. 4), which was located above 1991 Robeson’s upper bound [17,33,34,35] and near to 2008 Robeson’s upper bound (Figure 2a). The separation performance of the gas separation membrane EC-g2 was lower than that of 1991 Prior Upper Bound; however, it was relatively close (Figure 2a). Overall, the gas permeation properties of the grafted EC membranes approximately displayed the following order: EC-g3 > EC-g1 > EC-g4 > EC-g2 > EC. It can be mentioned that halogen atoms are highly electronegative and have electron-absorbing induction effect, F > Cl > Br > I [36]. On the other hand, BF4 has four fluorine boron bonds which are linked by SP3 hybrid orbital to form a stable tetrahedral molecule, so it has weak electron donating capacity. In this study, the electron donating capacities of anions were Br > Cl > BF4. The free electrons on bromide can interact with Lewis acid CO2, which can make the imidazole group more stable. Therefore, the gas separation performance of the EC-g3 membrane containing bromide was observed to be the best.
On the other hand, EC and ionic liquids were also blended to develop composite films. There are pairs of lone electrons in the imidazole ring of the ionic liquid, which can form hydrogen bonds with hydrogen atoms on the hydroxyl group of ethyl cellulose. Due to the action of the hydrogen bonding, the ionic liquid and ethyl cellulose can interact firmly, forming relatively stable composite films. The EC and ionic liquid-blended membranes exhibited high separation factors (18.6–19.5, Table 2, Nos. 6–9) and low permeability coefficients (46.0–110 Barrer). As a large amount of ionic liquid is added to the EC membranes, fractional free volume may become small, resulting in low permeability coefficients [37]. However, it also causes high permselectivity for CO2. Because blending is a physical mixture without chemical reaction, the phase structure of blending membrane is two phasic. It can be observed from scanning electron microscopy (Figure S4 in Supporting Information) that some ionic liquids are agglomerated, so it is difficult to have a good interaction with CO2, resulting in low permeability coefficients. Grafting is a chemical reaction that can have a homogeneous phase structure. IL dispersed well in the EC, effectively promoting the permeability of CO2, thus, improves CO2 permeation efficiency. Based on the findings observed, it can be concluded that the ionic liquid improved the separation factor of CO2/CH4 significantly.
For the mixture of CO2 and CH4, the CO2 molecule as a whole has no polarity, but the O in CO2 has a unique pair of electrons, which can form a hydrogen bond with H in CH4 (see Scheme S2 in Supporting Information). When the mixed gas contacts the surface of the membrane, it may be adsorbed and dissolved on the surface of the membrane in the form of one molecule pair. In EC-g1, EC-g3 and EC-g4, SCO2 is larger in CO2/CH4 than those in CO2/N2 (See Table 2). In the diffusion process, the presence of ionic liquids broke the hydrogen bonds. The interaction between CO2 and IL makes CO2 permeate preferentially, which can achieve the purpose of separation.
CO2/N2 permeability of the modified EC membranes was also determined, and the results are shown in Table 2 and Figure 2b. CO2 permeability coefficients were observed to improve from 43.2 for pure EC membrane upto 194 Barrer for the modified EC membranes, indicating an improvement of 4.6 times over EC membrane. Among the grafted EC membranes (Table 2, numbers 2–5), EC-g3 containing bromide ion exhibited the highest CO2 permselectivity (PCO2/PN2 26.2). EC-b3 also demonstrated the best PCO2/PN2 value of 31.9 among the blended EC membranes (Table 2, numbers 6–9). The separation performance of all gas separation membranes was observed to be under the 1991 prior upper bound (Figure 2b). Overall, the conclusion is similar to the case of CO2/CH4 mixture gas; i.e., bromide ion can enhance CO2 permselectivity (PCO2/PN2 or PCO2/PCH4). In other words, 1-carboxymethyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide was confirmed to be effective in enhancing the CO2 permselectivity of EC membranes.

4.3. Mechanical Properties of Polymer Membranes

The mechanical properties of the EC and modified EC membranes are shown in Table 3. Compared to EC, the elasticity moduli of the grafted membranes increased from 207 MPa for EC to 560–648 MPa; however, the blended membranes exhibited a decrease in modulus to 117–177 MPa. The results indicate that the grafted membranes (Table 3, numbers 2–5) are homogeneous, whose molecules are connected by covalent bonds. On the other hand, the blended membranes (Table 3, numbers 6–9) represent binary composites, which have weak physical connection, leading to reduced mechanical strength.
In the phenomenon shown in Table 3, we believe that in the blending system, the interior exists is two phases. EC is the continuous phase, the ionic liquid is the dispersed phase. The ionic liquid does have not much influence on the EC molecular structure. Although the content of ionic liquid is high, its caking property is weak, which has little effect on its mechanical properties. However, when EC is grafted with ionic liquid, the crystal structure of EC may change. The molecules are covalently bonded and intermolecular interactions are strong. With the different grafting degrees, the intermolecular forces will be different, showing different mechanical properties. The chains of ethyl cellulose were broken by grafting to decrease in molecular weight (See Table 1), which caused an increase in brittleness.

5. Conclusions

ECs grafted with ionic liquids were synthesized. Based on the infrared spectra, ionic liquids containing imidazole groups were successfully grafted into ethyl cellulose. The yields of ECs grafted with ionic liquids were about 62.5–64.1%, and the grafting degrees were 5.93–7.90%. The grafted products exhibited good membrane forming abilities. The CO2/CH4 separation factor in the membranes with EC grafted or blended with ionic liquids was almost two times compared to the pure EC membranes. Among these modified EC membranes, EC-g3 membrane was the best: the PCO2/PCH4 separation coefficient was 18.8 and the permeability coefficient (PCO2) was 199 Barrer. The bromide ion in EC-g3 can interact well with CO2, which promotes CO2 permeability. Thus, it can be confirmed that the imidazole ionic liquids are useful for improving the gas separation performances of the EC-based membranes.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/11/11/1900/s1, Scheme S1. Mechanism of pyridine-catalyzed esterification, Scheme S2. The coupling effect occurs of CO2 in the presence of CH4, Figure S1. FT-IR spectrum of EC-g2, Figure S2. FT-IR spectrum of EC-g3, Figure S3. FT-IR spectrum of EC-g4, Figure S4. SEM images of ethyl cellulose blended 1-carboxymethyl-3-methylimidazolium gas separation membrane.

Author Contributions

H.J. contributed to the conception of the study; N.Y. contributed significantly to the analysis and manuscript preparation; J.X. performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript; Q.W., G.Y., M.Z., S.X., Y.Z., L.M., P.J., H.Z. and H.W. helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions.

Funding

Financial and facility support for this research came from the Fundamental Research Funds in Heilongjiang provincial universities (YSTSXK201862, 135309110, and 135309503), the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang province, China (LH2019B032) and the Scientific Research Project of Qiqihar University (number 135309357).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Klemm, D.; Heublein, B.; Fink, H.; Bohn, A. Cellulose: Fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw materia. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2005, 36, 3358–3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Houde, A.Y.; Stern, S.A. Solubility and diffusivity of light gases in ethyl cellulose at elevated pressures Effects of ethoxy content. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 127, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Choi, S.H.; Tasselli, F.; Jansen, J.C. Effect of the preparation conditions on the formation of asymmetric poly (vinylidene fluoride) hollow fibre membranes with a dense skin. Eur. Polym. J. 2010, 46, 1713–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shen, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.D. Enhanced performance of a novel polyvinyl amine/chitosan/graphene oxide mixed matrix membrane for CO2 capture. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 1819–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yampolskii, Y.; Alentiev, A.; Bondarenko, G. Intermolecular interactions: New way to govern transport properties of membrane materials. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 12031–12037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, H.; Huang, Q.; Li, D. The generation of a molecular imprinted membrane by coating cellulose acetate onto a ZrO2-modified alumina membrane for the chiral separation of mandelic acid enantiomers. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2018, 22, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Veronika, V.; Ciahotny, K. Upgrading biogas to biomethane using membrane separation. Energy Fuel. 2017, 31, 9393–9401. [Google Scholar]
  8. Coombs Obrien, J.; Torrente-Murciano, L.; Mattia, D. Continuous production of cellulose microbeads via membrane emulsification. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 5931–5939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sirkar, K.K.; Shanbhag, P.V.; Kovvali, A.S. Membrane in a reactor: a functional perspective. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 38, 3715–3737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Josephine, O.M.; Kenneth, B.; John, F. Molecular sieving realized with ZIF-8/matrimid mixed-matrix membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 361, 28–37. [Google Scholar]
  11. Adams, R.; Carson, C.; Ward, J. Metal organic framework mixed matrix membranes for gas separations. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2010, 31, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lin, H.Q.; Freeman, B.D. Materials selection guidelines for membranes that remove CO2 from gas mixtures. J. Mol. Struct. 2005, 3, 57–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Murtaza, G. Ethylcellulose microparticles: A review. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2012, 69, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Xing, Q.; Zhao, F.; Chen, S.M. Porous biocompatible three-dimensional scaffolds of cellulose microfiber/gelatin composites for cell culture. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6, 2132–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. MoonR, J.; Martini, A.; Nairn, J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: Structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3941–3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Davidovich-Pinhas, M.; Barbut, S.; Marangoni, A.G. Physical structure and thermal behavior of ethylcellulose. Cellulose 2014, 21, 3243–3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.; Ma, X.; Ghanem, B.S. Polymers of intrinsic microporosity for energy-intensive membrane-based gas separations. Mater. Today Nano 2018, 3, 69–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lu, H.; Wang, Q.; Li, G. Electrospun water-stable zein/ethyl cellulose composite nanofiber and its drug release properties. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. 2017, 74, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khan, F.Z.; Sakaguchi, T.; Shiotsuki, M. Synthesis, characterization, and gas permeation properties of silylated derivatives of ethyl cellulose. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 6025–6030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, X.G.; Kresse, I. Jürgen springer, morphology and gas permselectivity of blend membranes of polyvinylpyridine with ethylcellulose. Polymer 2001, 16, 6859–6869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q. Thermotropic liquid crystallinity, thermal decomposition behavior, and aggregated structure of poly (propylene carbonate)/ethyl cellulose blends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100, 584–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, Q. Poly (amide-imide)/TiO2 nano-composite gas separation membranes: Fabrication and characterization. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 135, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Moaddeb, M.; Koros, W.J. Gas transport properties of thin polymeric membranes in the presence of silicon dioxide particles. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 125, 143–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sablok, A.; Jindal, R. Preparation and applications of room temperature ionic liquids in organic synthesis: a review on recent efforts. Curr. Green Chem. 2015, 2, 135–155. [Google Scholar]
  25. Andreatta, G.; Lee, L.T.; Lee, F.K. Gas permeability in polymer and surfactant-stabilized bubble films. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 11, 19537–19542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nikolaeva, D. The performance of affordable and stable cellulose-based poly-ionic membranes in CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 gas separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 564, 552–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, J.; Zang, Y.; Yin, G. Facile synthesis of five 2D surface modifiers by highly selective photocyclic aromatization and efficient enhancement of oxygen permselectivities of three polymer membranes by surface modification using a small amount of the 2D surface modifiers. Polymer 2014, 55, 1384–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fragaa, S.; Monteleoneb, M. A novel time lag method for the analysis of mixed gas diffusion in polymeric membranes by on-line mass spectrometry: Method development and validation. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 561, 39–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Beckman, I.; Shalygin, M.; Tepliakov, V. Particularities of membrane gas separation under unsteady state conditions. Mass Transfer in Chemical Engineering Processes; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011; Volume 1, pp. 205–232. [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Deng, X. Graft polymerization of acrylic acid onto polyphenylene sulfide nonwoven initiated by low temperature plasma. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 102, 5884–5889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shannon, M.S.; Bara, J.E. Reactive and reversible ionic liquids for CO2 capture and acid gas removal. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jia, H.; Luo, J.; Aoki, T. Synthesis and oxygen permselectivity of copoly (substituted acetylene)s with bulky fused polycyclic aliphatic groups. Polymer 2016, 99, 95–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Robeson, L.M. The upper bound revisited. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Comesaña-Gándara, B. Redefining the robeson upper bounds for CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 separations using a series of ultrapermeable benzotriptycene-based polymers of intrinsic microporosity. Energ. Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 2733–2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Swaidan, R.; Ghanem, B.; Pinnau, I. Fine-tuned Intrinsically ultramicroporous polymers redefine the permeability/selectivity upper bounds of membrane-based air and hydrogen separations. ACS Macro Lett. 2015, 4, 947–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Pathak, B.; Samanta, D.; Ahuja, R. Borane derivatives: A new class of super and hyperhalogens. ChemPhysChem 2011, 12, 2423–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, B.; Xu, D.; Zhang, X. Rubbery polymer inorganic nanocomposite membranes: Free volume characteristics on separation property. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 12444–12451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Synthetic route for obtaining ethyl cellulose (EC) grafted with ionic liquids (EC-g1–EC-g4).
Scheme 1. Synthetic route for obtaining ethyl cellulose (EC) grafted with ionic liquids (EC-g1–EC-g4).
Polymers 11 01900 sch001
Scheme 2. Preparation of EC blended with ionic liquids (EC-b1 - EC-b4).
Scheme 2. Preparation of EC blended with ionic liquids (EC-b1 - EC-b4).
Polymers 11 01900 sch002
Figure 1. FT-IR spectrum of EC-g1 and EC.
Figure 1. FT-IR spectrum of EC-g1 and EC.
Polymers 11 01900 g001
Figure 2. Plot of permselectivity vs permeability for the gas pairs (a) CO2/CH4 and (b) CO2/N2.
Figure 2. Plot of permselectivity vs permeability for the gas pairs (a) CO2/CH4 and (b) CO2/N2.
Polymers 11 01900 g002
Table 1. Molecular weight, yield and grafting degree of pure ethyl cellulose and grafted with ethyl cellulose.
Table 1. Molecular weight, yield and grafting degree of pure ethyl cellulose and grafted with ethyl cellulose.
No.EC DerivativesYield (%)N-element Content (%)Grafting Degree (%)Mwa(× 105)Mw/Mna
1EC---1.712.68
2EC-g164.10.977.901.212.32
3EC-g262.50.945.931.392.20
4EC-g363.70.987.741.702.62
5EC-g462.90.966.541.692.64
a Determined by GPC correlating polystyrene standard with THF eluent.
Table 2. Gas permeation properties of EC membranes modified with ionic liquids.
Table 2. Gas permeation properties of EC membranes modified with ionic liquids.
NO.MembranePCO2(Bar) a
(PCO2/PCH4)
DCO2b
(DCO2/DCH4) c
SCO2d
(SCO2/SCH4) e
PCO2(Bar) a
(PCO2/PN2)
DCO2b
(DCO2/DN2) c
SCO2d
(SCO2/SN2) e
1EC44.1
(9.01)
9.70
(0.21)
4.61
(42.9)
43.2
(20.6)
14.6
(1.82)
3.01
(11.8)
2EC-g1102
(17.8)
10.8
(0.07)
9.42
(262)
96.0
(25.9)
41.2
(1.31)
2.31
(20.5)
3EC-g261.5
(15.8)
35.6
(0.07)
1.71
(228)
67.7
(22.6)
31.8
(1.41)
2.11
(15.9)
4EC-g3165
(18.8)
5.31
(0.08)
31.0
(246)
157
(26.2)
18.4
(0.73)
8.6
(38.7)
5EC-g4199
(12.0)
3.32
(0.08)
60.8
(147)
194
(22.5)
13.6
(0.71)
14.2
(30.7)
6EC-b1110
(18.6)
9.41
(0.91)
11.7
(20.0)
119
(25.8)
19.3
(2.21)
6.21
(11.7)
7EC-b262.2
(18.8)
9.22
(0.71)
6.81
(26.7)
70.8
(26.2)
48.1
(2.21)
1.51
(11.7)
8EC-b376.0
(19.5)
23.5
(0.92)
3.22
(21.9)
79.7
(31.9)
13.2
(3.71)
6.02
(8.71)
9EC-b446.0
(19.2)
10.3
(0.81)
4.51
(23.8)
47.8
(23.9)
37.2
(2.22)
1.31
(11.1)
a 1 barrer = 10−10 cm3(STP)*cm cm−2s−1cmHg−1, b In 10−8 cm2 s−1, c In 10−2, d In 10−2 cm3 (STP)*cm-3 cmHg−1, e In 102.
Table 3. Mechanical properties of the membranes of EC modified with ionic liquids a.
Table 3. Mechanical properties of the membranes of EC modified with ionic liquids a.
No.MembraneThickness (mm)Elongation (%)Elasticity Modulus (MPa)
1EC0.139121.6207
2EC-g10.14484.22648
3EC-g20.11388.61560
4EC-g30.15913.92644
5EC-g40.12825.53593
6EC-b10.133816.2117
7EC-b20.098610.2177
8EC-b30.11588.71119
9EC-b40.089215.4143
a Tested at 5.00 mm/min speed. The standard spline had a length of 50 mm and a width of 10 mm.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, J.; Jia, H.; Yang, N.; Wang, Q.; Yang, G.; Zhang, M.; Xu, S.; Zang, Y.; Ma, L.; Jiang, P.; et al. High Efficiency Gas Permeability Membranes from Ethyl Cellulose Grafted with Ionic Liquids. Polymers 2019, 11, 1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11111900

AMA Style

Xu J, Jia H, Yang N, Wang Q, Yang G, Zhang M, Xu S, Zang Y, Ma L, Jiang P, et al. High Efficiency Gas Permeability Membranes from Ethyl Cellulose Grafted with Ionic Liquids. Polymers. 2019; 11(11):1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11111900

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Jingyu, Hongge Jia, Nan Yang, Qingji Wang, Guoxing Yang, Mingyu Zhang, Shuangping Xu, Yu Zang, Liqun Ma, Pengfei Jiang, and et al. 2019. "High Efficiency Gas Permeability Membranes from Ethyl Cellulose Grafted with Ionic Liquids" Polymers 11, no. 11: 1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11111900

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop