1. Introduction
Ferritic steels are good candidates for nuclear reactor applications, due to their microstructural stability, corrosion resistance, and favorable mechanical properties [
1,
2]. For instance, FeCrAl alloys are considered as candidates for the fuel cladding of light water reactors, due to their excellent corrosion resistance and mechanical properties. Moreover, nanostructured ferritic alloys (NFAs) are considered to be as one of the best candidates for structural components in next-generation reactors which are designed to operate at high temperatures and neutron damage levels, due to the existence of nano-oxides (NOs) [
3,
4,
5]. In order to optimize the processing parameters to produce fuel cladding tubes, it is critical to understand the microstructure evolution during thermo-mechanical processing, e.g., hot rolling and annealing. While low-density large particles have no considerable effects on the recrystallization of the alloys, the high density of the nanoparticles pin the grain boundaries, and they might affect the evolution of recrystallization. Especially in NFAs, it has been shown that NOs have a paramount effect on the recrystallization and texture evolution. It has been reported that recrystallization and grain growth occur in the rolling direction in the materials with NOs, resulting in anisotropic microstructures [
6,
7,
8]. This has been ascribed to be resulted from anisotropic pinning effect of NOs aligned in the direction of deformation. Moreover, due to the existence of large amounts of stored energy and Zener pinning, which are caused by the NO pinning of the grain boundaries, large instabilities occur in the microstructure, resulting in abnormal grain growth in these alloys [
8,
9,
10]. Additionally, the NO-dislocation interaction mechanism, which is proposed to result in dissolution and reprecipitation of NOs, is reported to result in abnormal grain growth in these materials [
11].
Texture development after phase transformation, deformation, and recrystallization in bcc materials, especially in steels, has been studied extensively [
8,
12,
13,
14]. It has been found that transformation textures occur on {001}<110> and {332}<113>. However, {332}<113> is transformed into {111}<110> with deformation [
15]. Therefore, α- and γ-fiber textures, especially {001}<110>, {111}<110>, {111}<112> and {112}<110> are typical cold rolling textures in iron and low-carbon steels [
16]. On the other hand, it has been shown that room temperature-60% compressed 14YWT alloys show {112}<110> and {112}<111> texture components during annealing [
8], in contrast to the conventional recrystallization textures in the body centered cubic alloys described in detail by Holscher et al. [
17]. However, the mechanism by which the NOs in this alloy change the texture evolution remains unclear, hampering the optimization of processing routes or predictive capabilities of the microstructure evolution for these materials.
In the present paper, we have investigated the effects of a high density of nano-particles on the texture and recrystallization in 14YWT alloys (with a nominal composition of 14Cr-3W-0.4Ti-0.21Y-Fe wt %) and compared it with dispersion-free FeCrAl alloys (with a nominal composition of 13Cr-5.2Al-0.05Y-2Mo-0.2Si-1Nb wt %). Neutron diffraction, electron back scattered diffraction, in situ and ex situ transmission electron microscopy have been utilized to understand the recrystallization mechanisms in these two types of alloys.
3. Results and Discussion
Figure 1a,b show the orientation maps of FeCrAl and 14YWT alloys, respectively, in the as-received condition. While orientation of the grains is random in the FeCrAl alloy, they are mostly oriented along the normal direction, parallel to the <100> with smaller amount oriented in the <111> directions in 14YWT alloy. The arrows in
Figure 1b indicate rolling and extrusion directions. Moreover, while the FeCrAl alloy has large grains of 50–400 µm, the 14YWT alloy has a much finer grain size of ~0.5 µm with a multimodal grain size distribution [
14].
Figure 1c,d show the brightfield TEM (BFTEM) images of the microstructures of these alloys. The FeCrAl alloy has a low fraction of second-phase particles having sizes ranging between ~100 nm and ~3 µm. On the other hand, 14YWT alloys have a high density (~6 × 10
23 m
−3) of NO (Y-Ti-O) particles [
18,
20,
21,
22]. The red arrows in these figures indicate the second-phase particles. It should be noted that there are other Ti-Si-O-N, Al-O, and Y-O rich particles in 14YWT, as described in [
18]. However, their volume fraction is extremely low compared to the volume fraction of NOs. As in the first study on this composition of FeCrAl alloy, the composition of the second-phase particles has been investigated as shown in
Figure 1e. Fifteen different particles were characterized by EDX, and three different compositions of particles were found. Note that the elements having high counts (such as Cr and Fe) are plotted separately (top plot) to the ones having low counts. A particle having a size ~3 µm is found to be enriched in all the elements, in the composition of these alloys, besides having Na-Mg-Cl. The smaller particle, having a size of ~250 nm is enriched mostly in Cu. There is a small amount of Mo and Nb enrichment, together with Fe and Cr depletion. Another small particle having a size ~150 nm is found to be rich in Fe, Cr, Mo, Nb, O, N, and C. Na, Mg, Cl, and Cu are presumed to be impurities that were picked up during the processing of these alloys.
Figure 2 shows the evolution of bulk texture as determined by neutron diffraction in FeCrAl and 14YWT alloys after compressing to 60% and annealing at 1000 °C and 1100 °C, respectively, for 4 h. No recrystallization in 14YWT alloys was observed at 1000 °C, even after several hours of annealing (up to 30 h) [
5,
8], therefore recrystallization studies have been conducted at 1100 °C. In the as-received condition, the texture of FeCrAl alloy is almost random (
Figure 2(a-1)) while the 14YWT alloy has a strong texture along <110>‖RD and <100>‖ND, and a weak texture of <111>‖ND (
Figure 2(b-1)). After 60% compression along ND, the FeCrAl alloy shows strong texture of <111>‖ND (
Figure 2(a-2)). Similarly, while the 14YWT alloy preserves its as-received texture types, the strength of <110>‖RD texture decreases, and the strength of <111>‖ND increases with overall increased texture strength after 60% compression (
Figure 2(b-2)). In other words, the texture evolution in both FeCrAl and 14YWT under compression is similar (increase in the strength of <111>‖ND texture component), meaning that the existence of NOs has no significant effect on the texture evolution under deformation. This indeed confirms our texture simulations using the viscoplastic self-consistent (VPSC) model [
8], predicting the plastic deformation of polycrystals and the texture development during rolling, as defined by Lebensohn et al. [
23]. In FeCrAl alloy, within ~2 h of annealing at 1000 °C, the strength of texture decreases and remains almost constant with further annealing, while still showing γ-fiber along <111>‖ND (
Figure 2(b-3)–(b-7)). In the case of the 14YWT alloy, the texture strength decreases within an hour of annealing at 1100 °C (still remaining high); however, it fluctuates overtime (
Figure 2(b-3)–(b-7)). Moreover, while the <100>‖ND texture remains still strong, the strength of the γ-fiber along <111>‖ND increases, indicating that some of the recrystallized grains are oriented along the normal direction. The changes in the texture types and the planes/directions are explained on the ODF sections in the following paragraph.
Texture types can be determined by ODF analysis, as shown in
Figure 3. Similar to the pole figures, while the texture is random in the case of the as-received condition of the FeCrAl alloy (
Figure 3(a-1)), its strength increases, and the γ-fiber dominates after 60% compression (
Figure 3(a-2)). Annealing at 1000 °C decreases the strength of the texture; however, the γ-fiber still dominates the microstructures of the FeCrAl alloy (
Figure 3(a-3)–(3-7)). In the case of the 14YWT alloy, there is already presence of a strong α-fiber, together with a weaker γ-fiber in as received condition (
Figure 3(b-1)). On the other hand, the γ-fiber becomes stronger after 60% compression (
Figure 3(b-2)). Different from the texture evolution in the case of the FeCrAl alloys, α-fiber and ε-fiber become more prominent as a result of annealing at 1100 °C (
Figure 3(b-3)–(b-7)). In other words, even though the deformation textures of both the 14YWT and FeCrAl alloys are similar (γ-fiber), the texture evolution during the recrystallization is different. While the FeCrAl alloy keeps their γ-fiber texture after recrystallization, the 14YWT sample develops an ε-fiber having a {112}<111> texture component, as a result of 1100 °C annealing, which can be attributed to the existence of NOs.
The texture type for the FeCrAl alloy remains same with increasing annealing time at 1000 °C; however, texture strength decreases considerably after 0.5 h of annealing, and it remains almost constant after 2 h of annealing at this temperature. In other words, in FeCrAl, almost 100% recrystallization occurs within 2 h of annealing at 1000 °C (see
Figure 2a). Moreover,
Supplementary Materials Figure S1 shows the grain size is much smaller compared to the as-received grain size, meaning that the grains are mostly recrystallized. In addition, the kernel average misorientation (KAM) map, which quantifies the accumulated misorientation within the neighborhood of a selected point with respect to a defined set of nearest neighbor points [
24], shows that there is almost no strain in the microstructure. This also indicates an almost complete recrystallization of the material after 2 h of annealing at 1000 °C, similar to the findings from the pole figures and the ODF sections in
Figure 2a and
Figure 3a. Even though a decrease in the texture index in FeCrAl alloys indicate some degree of random orientation of recrystallized grains, existence of the <111>‖ND texture after 100% recrystallization indicates that there is an oriented growth recrystallization texture rather than oriented nucleation in this alloy as there is no preferred orientation in the newly nucleated grains (see
Supplementary Figure S1) [
25,
26]. On the other hand, the 14YWT alloy shows a slight decrease in their texture strength within 0.5 h of annealing at 1100 °C while texture strength remains high and fluctuates in time after annealing at 1100 °C for 4 h. This fluctuation of texture strength can be attributed to either the variations in the texture in different 14YWT samples or grain boundary pinning of the NOs, as discussed in Ref [
8]. It should be noted that the relative strength of the <111>‖ND component increases after annealing, indicating an increase in the recrystallization amount [
17]. However, different than the other bcc recrystallization textures, the {112}<111> component becomes more prominent, which is attributed to the effect of the NOs on texture evolution. On the other hand, the existence of a strong α-fiber even after 4 h of annealing proves the existence of a high fraction of unrecrystallized grains in the material [
27]. Similar to the pole figures and the ODF sections obtained by neutron diffraction, the EBSD maps (see
Supplementary Figure S2) clearly indicate that even after 4 h of annealing at 1100 °C, there is a large portion of small grains in the 14YWT alloys. The KAM maps prove that these small grains are highly strained regions without any recrystallization while there are strain-free regions of recrystallized and abnormally grown grains. Moreover, the orientation maps indicate that unrecrystallized grains keep their orientations of <100>‖ND after annealing. On the other hand, recrystallized and abnormally grown grains show relatively random orientations.
The kinetics of isothermal recrystallization can be described by the Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kolmogorov (JMAK) equation [
28,
29,
30]:
where
Xrex is the fraction of recrystallization,
B is a temperature-dependent constant,
t is the isothermal annealing time, and
n is the Avrami exponent, which is a function of both the nucleation and growth rates. Equation (1) can be written as Equation (2):
Figure 4a,c show the recrystallization amount vs time plots for the FeCrAl and 14YWT alloys, respectively. In the FeCrAl alloy, ~60% of recrystallization occurs within half an hour of annealing, and recrystallization is completed within 3 h of annealing at 1000 °C. On the other hand, the fraction of recrystallization in 14YWT is ~5% within half an hour of annealing and increases to 10–15% after 4 h of annealing at 1100 °C.
Figure 4b,d show the plots of Equation (2), where the slopes of the straight lines result in the Avrami exponent,
n. The Avrami exponents for FeCrAl and 14YWT alloys can be found as 1 and 0.45, respectively. Theoretically,
n = 2 corresponds to 2D growth while
n = 3 corresponds to 3D growth, assuming site-saturated nucleation during recrystallization [
31]. On the other hand, low
n values have been reported for ferritic alloys in the literature. For instance, Malekjani et al. [
32] reported the Avrami exponents for ferritic and austenitic alloys between 0.75 and 1.1. Moreover, Xie et al. reported Avrami exponents of 0.5–0.6 for low-carbon steels having relatively high densities of sulfide particles [
33]. Garcia-Mateo et al. [
34] found this coefficient to be 0.4 in a V-containing steel, due to the existence of V(C,N) particles. Similarly, Shen et al. [
6] reported Avrami exponents between 0.4 and 0.9 for 12Cr ODS alloys. These lower values, in the case of ferritic alloys having a high density of second-phase particles, have been attributed to the strong grain boundary pinning by the precipitates, which delays the recrystallization considerably in these materials. Even though the Avrami exponent of FeCrAl alloy is low, the second phase particles in FeCrAl alloy do not have a profound effect on the recrystallization behavior of the alloys. On the other hand, high-density NOs retard recrystallization considerably.
14YWT alloys are extremely stable at high temperatures. In 60% compressed samples, recrystallization and growth start at 1100 °C; however, even at this temperature, the kinetics are sluggish. While ~5% is recrystallized after 30 min of annealing, only ~10% is recrystallized after 4 h of annealing at this temperature.
Figure 5 shows the microstructure evolution at 1100 °C under TEM. After 6.5 min of annealing at 1100 °C, there are subtle changes in the microstructure. Rather than the nucleation of new grains, two lamellar grains combine and form a thicker grain, while some part of the initial grain remains unchanged, as indicated by the white arrows in
Figure 5. Supplementary Video I also shows the in situ evolution of grain structure at 1100 °C. This indicates that at the beginning, secondary recrystallization, which can be nominated as abnormal grain growth, is the dominant mechanism in this alloy, rather than primary recrystallization which results in the formation of strain-free new equiaxed grains. However, after half an hour of annealing at 1100 °C, a few strain-free equiaxed grains could be seen, agreeing with our previous findings and the literature reporting the simultaneous occurrence of recrystallization and abnormal grain growth at above 850 °C [
8,
9]. In 14YWT alloys, due to the existence of different volume-fraction nanoparticles inside different grains and bimodal grain size distributions, the stored energy throughout the microstructure is not homogenous [
8]. These were reported to be the main reasons for abnormal grain growth in materials having nanoparticle dispersions. Therefore, the recrystallization behavior is closely related to the nano-particle and dislocation contents, as well as the sizes of the subsequent grains. The initial dominance of the abnormal grain growth in this study can be attributed to the large inhomogeneity in the microstructure as a result of the extensive deformation.
In conclusion, existence of a high-density of nanoparticles affect the texture and recrystallization mechanisms considerably. Even though the texture evolution after 60% compression is similar in FeCrAl and 14YWT alloys, the existence of the nanoparticles in 14YWT results in an ε-fiber having a {112}<111> texture component, which is different than FeCrAl alloy. Overall, sluggish recrystallization kinetics have been observed in both the FeCrAl and 14YWT alloys. However, the Avrami coefficient for the FeCrAl alloy has been found to be ~2 times larger than the one for the 14YWT alloy. In other words, the recrystallization kinetics are much slower in the 14YWT alloy due to the existence of a high density of NOs. KAM maps confirm the complete recrystallization of the FeCrAl alloys within 2–3 h of annealing at 1000 °C, while 10–15% recrystallization occurs in the case of the 14YWT alloys after annealing at 1100 °C for 4 h. Changes in the texture strength on the pole figures and ODF sections also indicate this behavior. Additionally, in situ TEM microscopy annealing experiments on 60% compressed 14YWT alloy support the slow recrystallization mechanisms in these alloys, showing that the abnormal grain growth occurs dominantly, together with some primary recrystallization due to a large inhomogeneity in the microstructure as a result of extensive deformation.