Effect of TiO 2 on the Microstructure and Flexural Strength of Lunar Regolith Simulant

: Lunar regolith is the preferred material for lunar base construction using in situ resource utilization technology. The TiO 2 variations in lunar regolith collected from different locations significantly impact its suitability as a construction material. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the effects of TiO 2 on the properties of lunar regolith. This study aims to evaluate the influence of TiO 2 content and sintering temperature on phase transformation, microstructure, and macroscopic properties (e.g., the shrinkage rate, mechanical properties, and relative density) of lunar regolith simulant samples (CUG-1A). The flexural strength and relative density of the sample with a TiO 2 content of 6 wt% sintered at 1100 ◦ C reached 136.66 ± 4.92 MPa and 91.06%, which were 65% and 12.28% higher than those of the sample not doped with TiO 2 , respectively. The experiment demonstrated that the doped TiO 2 not only reacted with Fe to form pseudobrookite (Fe 2 TiO 5 ) but also effectively reduced the viscosity of the glass phase during heat treatment. As the sintering temperature increased, the particles underwent a gradual melting process, leading to a higher proportion of the liquid phase. The higher liquid-phase content had a positive impact on the diffusion of mass transfer, causing the voids and gaps between particles to shrink. This shrinkage resulted in greater density and, ultimately, improved the mechanical properties of the material.


Introduction
The Moon, being the closest celestial body to Earth, unquestionably serves as the primary destination for human space exploration.The unique environment and rich mineral resources on the Moon are strategically significant for space exploration [1][2][3].Therefore, the construction of a lunar base, as a scientific research facility or supply station for deep space exploration, on the surface of the Moon is necessary [4,5].Dispatching resources through Earth-Moon round-trip transportation is uneconomical because it entails significant depletion of Earth's resources.To address this, the concept of in situ resource utilization (ISRU) technology was proposed after the first human landing on the Moon, and it has been widely recognized by the industry.Lunar regolith is formed through a series of extraterrestrial processes, including meteorite impacts, exposure to cosmic radiation, and solar wind activity.It exhibits an irregular shape with a wide particle-size distribution and non-uniform thickness; it comprises olivine, feldspar, pyroxene, and spinel minerals, along with a considerable amount of glass [6][7][8][9].These characteristics underscore the abundant availability and potential suitability of lunar regolith as a construction material for future lunar bases using ISRU technology [10,11].
The scarcity and high value of lunar regolith samples retrieved from the Moon pose a challenge for large-scale scientific research.Consequently, countries worldwide have developed lunar regolith simulants [12], such as FJS-1 [13,14], CAS-1 [15], and JSC-1 [16,17], based on the composition of existing lunar regolith.However, whether it is lunar regolith simulant or authentic lunar regolith, their intricate and diverse composition will and form open pores, thus hindering sample densification.This study considers that the establishment of a lunar base represents a multidisciplinary and collaborative endeavor, characterized by its sustained and long-term nature.In the imminent future, when a lunar base is effectively constructed, the provision of oxygen will become high, enduring, and sustainable.Additionally, the feasibility of extracting oxygen from lunar regolith has been demonstrated in previous studies, which can generate an oxygen atmosphere and the required air pressure for sintering lunar regolith samples [36,37].Consequently, this investigation employed sintering in an air environment.
In this study, we proposed a method for incorporating TiO 2 in varying proportions into the CUG-1A lunar regolith simulant as an additive component and implemented a sintering temperature gradient to investigate the effect of TiO 2 on the relative density and flexural strength of CUG-1A.Furthermore, we assessed and elucidated the effects of TiO 2 on the phase change, microstructure, and macroscopic properties of CUG-1A.We also determined the optimal ratios and sintering processes for achieving excellent mechanical properties during the preparation of CUG-1A.The aim of this study is to provide valuable insights for future research on ISRU technology and other related fields concerning lunar regolith.

Experimental Section 2.1. Materials
CUG-1A, the lunar regolith simulant, was provided by the Qian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology.CUG-1A [38][39][40] was developed and prepared at the China University of Geosciences.The raw materials were acquired from the Cenozoic volcanic rocks in Huinan County, Jilin Province, China.The main components of CUG-1A are listed in Table 1 [39] and include silicate minerals such as pyroxene (Ca, Mg, Fe) 2 Si 2 O 6 , anorthite (Ca, Na)(Al, Si) 4 O 8 , hortonolite (Mg, Fe) 3 SiO 4 , non-silicate ilmenite FeTiO 3 , and other amorphous phases.CUG-1A is classified as a low-titanium basalt analog owing to its low Ti content [31].Its chemical composition and physical properties are comparable to those of the lunar regolith collected at the Apollo 14 sampling points; thus, it is an ideal low-titanium lunar regolith simulant.A CUG-1A-TiO 2 mixed powder was prepared using nanoscale TiO 2 powder (Titanium dioxide, anatase, Shanghai Aladdin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) as the additive component.

Sample Preparation
The CUG-1A-TiO 2 samples were prepared as follows: First, the raw materials were accurately weighed using an analytical weighing balance and then mixed with anhydrous ethanol.The designed chemical compositions are presented in Table 2; T4, T6, and T10 are the experimental groups, and T0 is the control group.Subsequently, planetary ball milling was performed at 360 r/min for 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 h, respectively, to ensure thorough mixing of CUG-1A and TiO 2 and determine the optimal ball-milling process.The resultant powder was dried at 60 • C for 4 h, followed by screening through a 200-mesh sieve to obtain the CUG-1A-TiO 2 mixed powder.Finally, the obtained dry powder (18 g) was placed in a cylindrical stainless steel mold with an inner diameter of 40 mm and pressed using a four-top dry press under a pressure of 6 MPa for 1 min to form round sheets with a diameter of 40 mm and a thickness of 6 mm.CUG-1A-TiO 2 was prepared by applying isostatic pressing at 120 MPa for 300 s.

Sintering Experiments
The sintering process was conducted using a commercial box-type sintering furnace.CUG-1A-TiO 2 samples were placed on an Al2O3 substrate in a quartz ship during sintering.The target temperatures were set at 1050, 1100, 1120, 1140, and 1160 • C. The heating rate was maintained at 5 • C/min until the target temperature was reached, and the samples were held at that temperature for 2 h.Subsequently, controlled cooling was carried out at a rate of 3 • C/min.Upon reaching 500 • C, the CUG-1A-TiO 2 samples underwent natural cooling within the furnace.

Characterization
The particle size distribution of the powder was determined using a laser diffraction particle size analyzer (Mastersizer 2000, Malvern, UK), mixed with a small amount of water, and the refractive index of the powder was adjusted to 1.7.The phase composition of the sample was tested using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, D8-Advance, Bruker, Germany), in which the scanning angle was 10~70 • , and the step length was 0.02 • .Thermal analysis of the samples was performed using a synchronous thermal analyzer (TGA/DSC3+, Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland) in an air environment ranging from room temperature to 1200 • C, with a heating rate of 10 • C/min.
The bulk density (ρ) of the sample was determined using the Archimedes drainage method, and an average value was obtained from five measurements.Given the complex composition of the simulated lunar soil and its propensity for phase changes during sintering, the sample underwent grinding and screening through a 100-mesh sieve.Subsequently, its real density (ρ real ) was measured using a specific gravity bottle.The real density of the ground powder served as a substitute for the theoretical density of the sample.The equation for calculating the relative density (ρ r ) is as follows: The diameter and height of the disc before and after sintering were measured using a vernier caliper, and the shrinkage of the sintering line of the sample in the X/Y and Z axes was calculated using the following formula: where η X/Y is the linear shrinkage of the sample along the X/Y axes, R 0 is the diameter of the sample before sintering, R 1 is the diameter of the sample after sintering, η Z is the linear shrinkage of the sample along the Z-axis, H 0 is the height of the sample before sintering, and H 1 is the height of the sample after sintering (unit: mm).
Asper ASTM standard C1161-13 [38], a three-point bending test was performed using a universal mechanical testing machine (Inspekt Table Blue 05, Hegewald & Peschke, Nossen, Germany) to evaluate the flexural strength of the sample.The sintered sample was cut into a cuboid measuring 3.0 mm × 4.0 mm × 35 mm using a small diamond wire cutter (STX-202A), and its surface was subsequently polished.The test span was set at 30 mm, with a loading speed of 0.5 mm/min.Five samples were tested to take the average value.
Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental analysis was performed using an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Inca X-Max50, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) combined with field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM; SU8220, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) to observe the microstructure of the sample, including the microstructure of the powder, the morphology of the block fracture surface and the polished surface, and the element analysis of the block polished surface energy spectrum.Due to the extremely low conductivity of the CUG-1A-TiO 2 sintered samples, a pre-gold spraying treatment was required before testing.

CUG-1A-TiO 2 Ball-Milling Process
As previously mentioned, lunar regolith particles exhibit irregular shapes and a wide range of particle-size distributions.Sintering without pre-treatment adversely affects the performance of a sample [10,11].During the sintering of fine particles, the atomic diffusion distance reduces, thus enhancing particle solubility in the liquid phase and facilitating faster and more efficient sintering; this contributes to the improved properties of the sample [41].Therefore, to eliminate this interfering factor, the CUG-1A-TiO 2 powder was initially subjected to ball milling for different durations to determine the optimal process.The particle sizes of the CUG-1A-TiO 2 powder with different ball-milling durations are presented in Table 3.After 6 h of ball milling, the particle size of T0 (D10, D50, and D90) decreased by 131%, 233%, and 163%, respectively, compared with the initial state (0 h).However, after a milling duration of 8 h, no significant change was observed in the particle size of CUG-1A-TiO 2 .The variation curve for the specific surface area of the T6 powder after ball milling was also examined (Figure 1); it showed an increase with a prolonged ball-milling duration.When the milling duration exceeded 6 h, no substantial changes were observed in the specific surface area of the powder.These results indicate that after a ball-milling duration of 6 h, the effect of ball milling on the CUG-1A-TiO 2 powder particles becomes negligible.Considering both the post-milling properties and experimental efficiency factors, we determined a ball-milling duration of precisely 6 h to be optimal.
Crystals 2024, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 19 cut into a cuboid measuring 3.0 mm × 4.0 mm × 35 mm using a small diamond wire cutter (STX-202A), and its surface was subsequently polished.The test span was set at 30 mm, with a loading speed of 0.5 mm/min.Five samples were tested to take the average value.Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental analysis was performed using an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Inca X-Max50, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) combined with field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM; SU8220, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) to observe the microstructure of the sample, including the microstructure of the powder, the morphology of the block fracture surface and the polished surface, and the element analysis of the block polished surface energy spectrum.Due to the extremely low conductivity of the CUG-1A-TiO2 sintered samples, a pre-gold spraying treatment was required before testing.

CUG-1A-TiO2 Ball-Milling Process
As previously mentioned, lunar regolith particles exhibit irregular shapes and a wide range of particle-size distributions.Sintering without pre-treatment adversely affects the performance of a sample [10,11].During the sintering of fine particles, the atomic diffusion distance reduces, thus enhancing particle solubility in the liquid phase and facilitating faster and more efficient sintering; this contributes to the improved properties of the sample [41].Therefore, to eliminate this interfering factor, the CUG-1A-TiO2 powder was initially subjected to ball milling for different durations to determine the optimal process.The particle sizes of the CUG-1A-TiO2 powder with different ball-milling durations are presented in Table 3.After 6 h of ball milling, the particle size of T0 (D10, D50, and D90) decreased by 131%, 233%, and 163%, respectively, compared with the initial state (0 h).However, after a milling duration of 8 h, no significant change was observed in the particle size of CUG-1A-TiO2.The variation curve for the specific surface area of the T6 powder after ball milling was also examined (Figure 1); it showed an increase with a prolonged ball-milling duration.When the milling duration exceeded 6 h, no substantial changes were observed in the specific surface area of the powder.These results indicate that after a ball-milling duration of 6 h, the effect of ball milling on the CUG-1A-TiO2 powder particles becomes negligible.Considering both the post-milling properties and experimental efficiency factors, we determined a ball-milling duration of precisely 6 h to be optimal.The SEM image in Figure 2 shows the T6 powder morphology at the milling durations of 0, 2, and 6 h.An evident refinement and uniformity of the powder can be observed with increasing milling duration.As shown in Figure 2c, the large particles depicted in Figure 2a are eliminated, whereas the aspect ratio and specific surface area of the particles are enhanced.Thus, ball milling for 6 h to prepare and sinter the powder yields a sample surface that exhibits significantly improved performance compared with direct preparation and sintering without ball milling.The SEM image in Figure 2 shows the T6 powder morphology at the milling durations of 0, 2, and 6 h.An evident refinement and uniformity of the powder can be observed with increasing milling duration.As shown in Figure 2c, the large particles depicted in Figure 2a are eliminated, whereas the aspect ratio and specific surface area of the particles are enhanced.Thus, ball milling for 6 h to prepare and sinter the powder yields a sample surface that exhibits significantly improved performance compared with direct preparation and sintering without ball milling.

Phase Analysis
The phase evolution during the sintering process was analyzed to better understand the effect of varying the TiO2 content on the thermodynamic behavior of CUG-1A-TiO2.The XRD pattern (Figure 3) of the CUG-1A-TiO2 samples indicates the presence of pseudobrookite (PDF#41-1432), diopside (PDF#41-1370), anorthite (PDF#41-1481), forsterite (PDF#34-0189), augite (PDF#41-1483), and amorphous glass.Additionally, a weak diffraction peak corresponding to magnesium dititanate (MgTi2O5) (PDF#35-0792) is observed for T10.Compared with T0, the diffraction peak of pseudobrookite (Fe2TiO5) becomes more apparent as the TiO2 content increases, whereas the intensity of the hematite (Fe2O3) (PDF#33-0664) peak weakens.All the PDF cards can be found in the Supplementary Materials.When the TiO2 content exceeds 6 wt%, some hematite peaks disappear.Furthermore, as the TiO2 content increases, the intensity of the diffraction peaks for certain augite and forsterite minerals initially increases and then decreases.This may be due to the potential vitrification of silicate minerals at high temperatures, forming an amorphous phase.Alternatively, it could be attributed to the generation of volatiles with low melting

Phase Analysis
The phase evolution during the sintering process was analyzed to better understand the effect of varying the TiO 2 content on the thermodynamic behavior of CUG-1A-TiO 2 .The XRD pattern (Figure 3) of the CUG-1A-TiO 2 samples indicates the presence of pseudobrookite (PDF#41-1432), diopside (PDF#41-1370), anorthite (PDF#41-1481), forsterite (PDF#34-0189), augite (PDF#41-1483), and amorphous glass.Additionally, a weak diffraction peak corresponding to magnesium dititanate (MgTi 2 O 5 ) (PDF#35-0792) is observed for T10.Compared with T0, the diffraction peak of pseudobrookite (Fe 2 TiO 5 ) becomes more apparent as the TiO 2 content increases, whereas the intensity of the hematite (Fe 2 O 3 ) (PDF#33-0664) peak weakens.All the PDF cards can be found in the Supplementary Materials.When the TiO 2 content exceeds 6 wt%, some hematite peaks disappear.Furthermore, as the TiO 2 content increases, the intensity of the diffraction peaks for certain augite and forsterite minerals initially increases and then decreases.This may be due to the potential vitrification of silicate minerals at high temperatures, forming an amorphous phase.Alternatively, it could be attributed to the generation of volatiles with low melting points.The XRD patterns of T6 samples sintered at different temperatures are presented in Figure 4.It is evident that with increasing temperature, the diffraction peaks of pseudobrookite, diopside, anorthite, forsterite, and augite initially intensify and then weaken; however, the peaks corresponding to hematite (Fe 2 O 3 ) diminish and eventually disappear.Nevertheless, when the temperature reaches 1160 • C, prominent diffraction peaks cannot be observed in the XRD curve.The XRD (Figure 4) shows the loss of peaks at an elevated sintering temperature, indicating the mineral underwent significant vitrification, resulting in the formation of a glass phase, and it also indicates the formation of a magnesium-rich phase.Some studies have demonstrated that the melting temperature plays a crucial role in silicate formation and that, in addition to other factors, the mineral composition, flux compounds, presence and abundance of volatiles, and disordered substances contribute to the variations in the melting temperature of CUG-1A-TiO 2 [42].In addition, as is known, the amorphous phases with disordered structures and low softening temperatures can be more unstable [18,35].Furthermore, the alteration could be intensified by elevated temperatures.
points.The XRD patterns of T6 samples sintered at different temperatures are presented in Figure 4.It is evident that with increasing temperature, the diffraction peaks of pseudobrookite, diopside, anorthite, forsterite, and augite initially intensify and then weaken; however, the peaks corresponding to hematite (Fe2O3) diminish and eventually disappear.Nevertheless, when the temperature reaches 1160 °C, prominent diffraction peaks cannot be observed in the XRD curve.The XRD (Figure 4) shows the loss of peaks at an elevated sintering temperature, indicating the mineral underwent significant vitrification, resulting in the formation of a glass phase, and it also indicates the formation of a magnesium-rich phase.Some studies have demonstrated that the melting temperature plays a crucial role in silicate formation and that, in addition to other factors, the mineral composition, flux compounds, presence and abundance of volatiles, and disordered substances contribute to the variations in the melting temperature of CUG-1A-TiO2 [42].In addition, as is known, the amorphous phases with disordered structures and low softening temperatures can be more unstable [18,35].Furthermore, the alteration could be intensified by elevated temperatures.points.The XRD patterns of T6 samples sintered at different temperatures are presented in Figure 4.It is evident that with increasing temperature, the diffraction peaks of pseudobrookite, diopside, anorthite, forsterite, and augite initially intensify and then weaken; however, the peaks corresponding to hematite (Fe2O3) diminish and eventually disappear.Nevertheless, when the temperature reaches 1160 °C, prominent diffraction peaks cannot be observed in the XRD curve.The XRD (Figure 4) shows the loss of peaks at an elevated sintering temperature, indicating the mineral underwent significant vitrification, resulting in the formation of a glass phase, and it also indicates the formation of a magnesium-rich phase.Some studies have demonstrated that the melting temperature plays a crucial role in silicate formation and that, in addition to other factors, the mineral composition, flux compounds, presence and abundance of volatiles, and disordered substances contribute to the variations in the melting temperature of CUG-1A-TiO2 [42].In addition, as is known, the amorphous phases with disordered structures and low softening temperatures can be more unstable [18,35].Furthermore, the alteration could be intensified by elevated temperatures.
Chen et al. [44] investigated the elevated-temperature behavior of ilmenite and proposed that the oxidation products of FeTiO 3 vary with increasing temperature.At 600-800  (8).Furthermore, Fe 2 Ti 3 O 9 decomposes into Fe 2 O 3 and TiO 2 at above ~1000 • C (9). Fe 2 TiO 5 is formed from the recombination of Fe 2 O 3 with TiO 2 at 1000-1200 • C (10).Although the specific temperature for the high-temperature formation of Fe 2 TiO 5 varies across different studies, a general correspondence can be noted between the formation and the temperature range within which Fe 2 TiO 5 is formed.
Fe 2 O 3 +TiO 2 = Fe 2 TiO 5 (10) By analyzing the T0 curve and cross-referencing Table 2, we can see that the CUG-1A utilized in this experiment belongs to the category of low-titanium lunar regolith simulant, with a TiO 2 content of approximately 1.9 wt%.Consequently, even after the aforementioned reactions, the formation of Fe 2 TiO 5 is inevitably limited.This observation is consistent with the subdued diffraction peak of Fe 2 TiO 5 in the T0 curve of the XRD pattern.With increasing TiO 2 content, hematite (Fe 2 O 3 ) can react sufficiently with abundant TiO 2 to generate Fe 2 TiO 5 (6) or (10) at elevated temperatures.This phenomenon further indicates the weakening of the diffraction peak of Fe 2 O 3 , along with a gradual enhancement of the diffraction peak of Fe 2 TiO 5 .These findings are consistent with those of Zhang et al. [43] and Chen et al. [44].

Thermal Analysis
The synchronous thermal analysis (TGA-DSC) results of T0 and T6 are presented in Figure 5, revealing distinct differences between the two sets of curves.Additionally, the weightlessness process for T0 can be roughly categorized into three stages (Figure 5a): the first stage occurs from room temperature to approximately 380 • C, during which the primary transformation in the sample involves the volatilization of water, encompassing both adsorbed water molecules on particle surfaces and within the crystal lattice.The second stage takes place between around 380 • C and 550 • C, characterized by a discernible steepening of the curve slope, indicating an elevated rate of mass loss.Wilkerson et al. [21] determined that the mass loss events occurring at different temperature ranges during the heat treatment of lunar regolith simulant JSC-1A have distinct origins and compositions.The mass loss observed from approximately 200 • C to 500 • C primarily consists of H 2 O, CO, CO 2 , SO 2 , and SO 3 , which is likely a result of either physisorbed gases or the decomposition of carbonates and sulfates with low stability.A significant mass loss, accompanied by a substantial evolution of CO 2 , is observed in the temperature range of 500 • C to 600 • C.This mass loss is attributed to the decomposition of a non-lunar trace carbonate, such as CaCO 3 .Notably different from the vacuum sintering investigated in that study, air sintering involving oxygen effectively increases the heat energy required for the fusion process of amorphous phases and expedites their molten state evaporation [45,46].Thus, considering that the sintering was conducted in an ambient air environment in this study, Crystals 2024, 14, 110 9 of 18 and the CUG-1A composition contained only minimal amounts of sulfide, it is likely that the material loss at this stage resulted from hydration phase decomposition and carbonate decomposition.The third stage occurs above ~700 • C; the rate of weightlessness decreases.The evident heat absorption peak is observed at 1083 • C in the corresponding DSC curve.This phenomenon may be attributed to the depletion of specific silicate materials, and the amorphous phase is vitrifying these mineral phases.
amorphous phase is vitrifying these mineral phases.
The TGA-DSC results of T6 (Figure 5b) show an unexpected rise in the TGA curve between 600 °C and 783 °C, indicating the formation of new substances during high-temperature sintering.In addition, from 765 °C to 773 °C, a simultaneous exothermic peak appears in the DSC curves, providing evidence for our inference in Section 3.2: we speculate that TiO2 inclusion causes an increase in the amount of Fe2Ti3O9, which subsequently decomposes into pseudobrookite (Fe2TiO5) as the temperature further increases.Notably, at equivalent temperatures, T6 experiences a substance loss that is 2.4465% lower than that of T0, suggesting that TiO2 can react with molten amorphous Fe to form Fe2TiO5 and reduce the generation of volatile amorphous phases during the high-temperature firing of the CUG-1A.The diffraction peaks of pyroxene and olivine in the experimental group are stronger than those for T0, further supporting the results of this analysis, which means that the addition of TiO2 may inhibit the decomposition or evaporation of mineral components.

Microstructure and EDS Analysis
Figure 6 presents the SEM images of the fractured and polished microstructure surfaces of the samples sintered at 1100 °C.Noticeable differences can be observed among T10 (e), T6 (f), T4 (g), and T0 (h).T0 exhibits irregular large pores in patch-like formations, while T10, T6, and T4 display individual pores.Moreover, the number of pores within the same observation range initially decreases and then increases with increasing TiO2 content.The evaporation process during sintering restricts material transfer and reduces the presence of pores, resulting in the formation of macropores [18,45].I. P. Alekseeva et al. [47,48] have also suggested that TiO2 induces liquid unmixing, causing metastable liquid phase separation and lowering the crystallization temperature of glass.Similarly, Lim et al. [49] demonstrated that the addition of TiO2 to the regolith simulant decreased the viscosity of molten slag and improved the wettability between molten iron and slag.
Combining the results of SEM and XRD and the aforementioned related investigations, we postulate that the underlying factors contributing to this phenomenon may be as follows: First, air sintering facilitates liquid-phase melting to promote sintering.Second, the addition of TiO2 reduces the viscosity, enhances the wettability and fluidity of glass, and facilitates element migration within the glass system, thereby lowering the crystallization temperature of the glass.Third, an appropriate amount of TiO2 not only increases the titanium content in CUG-1A but also reacts with Fe2O3 to form Fe2TiO5 and with Fe in the molten amorphous state to form Fe2TiO5.These reactions effectively prevent substance evaporation and an excessive increase in the amount of liquid-phase components caused by the formation of a low-melting-point iron-containing solid solution.These also accelerate the mass transfer rate during sintering, leading to closer particle The TGA-DSC results of T6 (Figure 5b) show an unexpected rise in the TGA curve between 600 • C and 783 • C, indicating the formation of new substances during hightemperature sintering.In addition, from 765 • C to 773 • C, a simultaneous exothermic peak appears in the DSC curves, providing evidence for our inference in Section 3.2: we speculate that TiO 2 inclusion causes an increase in the amount of Fe 2 Ti 3 O 9 , which subsequently decomposes into pseudobrookite (Fe 2 TiO 5 ) as the temperature further increases.Notably, at equivalent temperatures, T6 experiences a substance loss that is 2.4465% lower than that of T0, suggesting that TiO 2 can react with molten amorphous Fe to form Fe 2 TiO 5 and reduce the generation of volatile amorphous phases during the high-temperature firing of the CUG-1A.The diffraction peaks of pyroxene and olivine in the experimental group are stronger than those for T0, further supporting the results of this analysis, which means that the addition of TiO 2 may inhibit the decomposition or evaporation of mineral components.

Microstructure and EDS Analysis
Figure 6 presents the SEM images of the fractured and polished microstructure surfaces of the samples sintered at 1100 • C. Noticeable differences can be observed among T10 (e), T6 (f), T4 (g), and T0 (h).T0 exhibits irregular large pores in patch-like formations, while T10, T6, and T4 display individual pores.Moreover, the number of pores within the same observation range initially decreases and then increases with increasing TiO 2 content.The evaporation process during sintering restricts material transfer and reduces the presence of pores, resulting in the formation of macropores [18,45].I. P. Alekseeva et al. [47,48] have also suggested that TiO 2 induces liquid unmixing, causing metastable liquid phase separation and lowering the crystallization temperature of glass.Similarly, Lim et al. [49] demonstrated that the addition of TiO 2 to the regolith simulant decreased the viscosity of molten slag and improved the wettability between molten iron and slag.
viscosity and improve the fluidity of the glass.Severely reduced viscosity of the glass re sults in macroscopic deformation of the sample.The sample will experience severe defor mation following sintering at an elevated temperature, such as 1160 °C.Furthermore, al hough the reduction in glass viscosity and increase in the liquid-phase content promot element migration within the glass system [51,52] and enhance the mass transfer pro cesses, an excessive amount of TiO2 can react with the Mg 2+ present in the low-melting point magnesia solid solution or pyroxene to form magnesium dititanate (MgTi2O [53,54] (as indicated by the XRD curve of T10 shown in Figure 3).As mentioned prev ously, an excess of evaporating substances during sintering can impede mass transfe Similarly, an excess of the molten state can hinder gas discharge and increase the trappe gas pressure within the closed pores.This results in a higher number of closed pore which inevitably have a detrimental effect on the sintering pattern performance.A signi icant increase and expansion of the internal pores are evident in T10 (Figure 5e).Conse quently, the inclusion of excessive TiO2 doping in T10 leads to a significant deterioratio in its properties, including shrinkage, relative density, and mechanical characteristic when compared to T6.Table 4 presents the EDS results for the marked regions in Figure 6.Regions Aexhibit high concentrations of Fe, Ti, and O, while region D displays lower levels of F and Ti.The predominant components in regions A-C are Fe2TiO5, Fe2O3, and TiO2, whic align with the chemical Equations ( 7)-( 9) when combined with the XRD findings.On th other hand, region D primarily consists of hematite (Fe2O3).The low presence of Mg i region D, along with the TGA-DSC results (Figure 5a) and its secondary analysis, indicat the evaporation of the molten amorphous state.The reduced Mg content is presumed t be the result of its consumption from the amorphous phase in order to form numerou Fe-Ti-O phases.Consequently, Ca is not being concentrated elsewhere for the formatio of other mineral crystals.Naturally, the hindrance of the mass transfer process due t evaporation inevitably leads to the formation of macroscopic pores.Regions A-C hav high Mg and Fe contents.Based on the inference from the thermal analysis (Section 3.3 we can conclude that the TiO2 content effectively mitigates the generation or volatilizatio Combining the results of SEM and XRD and the aforementioned related investigations, we postulate that the underlying factors contributing to this phenomenon may be as follows: First, air sintering facilitates liquid-phase melting to promote sintering.Second, the addition of TiO 2 reduces the viscosity, enhances the wettability and fluidity of glass, and facilitates element migration within the glass system, thereby lowering the crystallization temperature of the glass.Third, an appropriate amount of TiO 2 not only increases the titanium content in CUG-1A but also reacts with Fe 2 O 3 to form Fe 2 TiO 5 and with Fe in the molten amorphous state to form Fe 2 TiO 5 .These reactions effectively prevent substance evaporation and an excessive increase in the amount of liquid-phase components caused by the formation of a low-melting-point iron-containing solid solution.These also accelerate the mass transfer rate during sintering, leading to closer particle bonding.Consequently, the large pores cluster together and shrink into independent pores, ensuring uniform sample shrinkage, which contributes to enhance the relative density of the samples, resulting in an increase in flexural strength.The fracture morphologies of the samples are shown in Figure 6i-l.Compared with T0, which still exhibits a granular structure after sintering (l), the experimental groups ((i), (j), and (k)) clearly display an increased presence of a fuller liquid phase during the sintering process.This phenomenon further supports the aforementioned viewpoint that the addition of TiO 2 promotes liquid-phase formation and facilitates closer bonding between neighboring particles, which will enhance the The relative densities of T4 and T6 samples; thus, the performance characteristics of these samples are considerably enhanced [18,45,46].
However, the excessive addition of TiO 2 may have the opposite effect.When the TiO 2 content increases from 6 wt% to 10 wt%, the amounts of the liquid-phase products decrease (Figure 6e).At higher temperatures, TiO 2 can act as an intermediate oxide within the glass system, replacing Si 4+ in the silicon-oxygen tetrahedral structure and forming coordination bonds with O 2− .This process disrupts the intricate silicon-oxygen tetrahedral network.
Consequently, excessive doping of TiO 2 can significantly decrease the viscosity of glass [50].However, when TiO 2 is appropriately doped, it can effectively reduce viscosity and improve the fluidity of the glass.Severely reduced viscosity of the glass results in macroscopic deformation of the sample.The sample will experience severe deformation following sintering at an elevated temperature, such as 1160 • C. Furthermore, although the reduction in glass viscosity and increase in the liquid-phase content promote element migration within the glass system [51,52] and enhance the mass transfer processes, an excessive amount of TiO 2 can react with the Mg 2+ present in the low-melting-point magnesia solid solution or pyroxene to form magnesium dititanate (MgTi 2 O 5 ) [53,54] (as indicated by the XRD curve of T10 shown in Figure 3).As mentioned previously, an excess of evaporating substances during sintering can impede mass transfer.Similarly, an excess of the molten state can hinder gas discharge and increase the trapped gas pressure within the closed pores.This results in a higher number of closed pores, which inevitably have a detrimental effect on the sintering pattern performance.A significant increase and expansion of the internal pores are evident in T10 (Figure 5e).Consequently, the inclusion of excessive TiO 2 doping in T10 leads to a significant deterioration in its properties, including shrinkage, relative density, and mechanical characteristics when compared to T6.
Table 4 presents the EDS results for the marked regions in Figure 6.Regions A-C exhibit high concentrations of Fe, Ti, and O, while region D displays lower levels of Fe and Ti.The predominant components in regions A-C are Fe 2 TiO 5 , Fe 2 O 3 , and TiO 2 , which align with the chemical Equations ( 7)-( 9) when combined with the XRD findings.On the other hand, region D primarily consists of hematite (Fe 2 O 3 ).The low presence of Mg in region D, along with the TGA-DSC results (Figure 5a) and its secondary analysis, indicate the evaporation of the molten amorphous state.The reduced Mg content is presumed to be the result of its consumption from the amorphous phase in order to form numerous Fe-Ti-O phases.Consequently, Ca is not being concentrated elsewhere for the formation of other mineral crystals.Naturally, the hindrance of the mass transfer process due to evaporation inevitably leads to the formation of macroscopic pores.Regions A-C have high Mg and Fe contents.Based on the inference from the thermal analysis (Section 3.3), we can conclude that the TiO 2 content effectively mitigates the generation or volatilization of certain lowmelting-point substances during the high-temperature sintering of CUG-1A.This confirms that TiO 2 plays a positive role in reducing the evaporation of Mg-or Fe-containing lowmelting-point substances formed during sintering [18,45], thereby enhancing the properties of the samples.The appearance of the samples after sintering is shown in Figure 7. Notably, T6 (d), subjected to a sintering temperature of 1160 • C, exhibits severe deformation, the observed results appear to be consistent with the findings from our previous XRD analysis (as indicated by the XRD curve of 1160 • C shown in Figure 4).whereas the surface of T0 (b) displays unevenness.The other samples are well-sintered.Furthermore, T0 appears reddish-brown owing to hematite formation, as confirmed in the XRD analysis (Figure 3).In contrast, T6 displays a yellowish-brown color.

Sintering Shrinkage and Relative Density of CUG-1A-TiO2 Samples
The appearance of the samples after sintering is shown in Figure 7. Notably, T6 (d), subjected to a sintering temperature of 1160 °C, exhibits severe deformation, the observed results appear to be consistent with the findings from our previous XRD analysis (as indicated by the XRD curve of 1160 °C shown in Figure 4).whereas the surface of T0 (b) displays unevenness.The other samples are well-sintered.Furthermore, T0 appears reddishbrown owing to hematite formation, as confirmed in the XRD analysis (Figure 3).In contrast, T6 displays a yellowish-brown color.As the samples exhibit a round-like shape in the X-Y plane, the X-axis and Y-axis are combined into a single X-axis during measurements.Figure 8 shows the linear shrinkage rate of each group of sintered samples in the X-and Z-axes at varying sintering temperatures.The relative densities of the sintered samples are shown in Figure 9, and the bulk density and real density of the sintered samples are shown in Tables 5 and 6, respectively.The shrinkage rate of the samples initially increases and then decreases with increasing temperature (Figure 8), and the relative density of the samples exhibits a similar pattern (Figure 8).Additionally, the shrinkage rate of the samples shows the same trend as the content of TiO 2 at the same temperature.The shrinkage rate along the X-axis is generally lower than that along the Z-axis.At the sintering temperature of 1100 • C, all samples exhibit maximum shrinkage in all directions and achieve the highest relative density.At 1100 • C, among all samples, T6 exhibits the highest sintering shrinkage of 17.9 ± 0.2% and 21.7 ± 0.5% along the X-and Z-axes, respectively, which are 13.29% and 25.43% higher than those of T0, respectively.The relative density of T6 reaches 91.06%, indicating a significant enhancement of 12.28% compared with that of T0, which has a relative density of 81.10%.The observed trends in the shrinkage rate and relative density are consistent with those discussed in Section 3.4.sity.At 1100 °C, among all samples, T6 exhibits the highest sintering shrinkage of 17.9 ± 0.2% and 21.7 ± 0.5% along the X-and Z-axes, respectively, which are 13.29% and 25.43% higher than those of T0, respectively.The relative density of T6 reaches 91.06%, indicating a significant enhancement of 12.28% compared with that of T0, which has a relative density of 81.10%.The observed trends in the shrinkage rate and relative density are consistent with those discussed in Section 3.4.

Mechanical Properties
To assess the impact of TiO 2 content on the mechanical properties of the CUG-1A samples, the flexural strengths of the sintered samples were determined and are illustrated in Figure 10.The experimental group generally exhibits higher flexural strength compared to T0, indicating the influence of TiO 2 content on the mechanical properties of CUG-1A.The flexural strength of all sample groups initially increases and then decreases with increasing sintering temperatures.At a sintering temperature of 1100 • C, all sample groups achieve optimal flexural strength.However, unlike T0, which exhibits only slight deformation (Figure 7b), samples in the experimental group experience severe melting deformation (Figure 7d) and cannot be tested for flexural strength at 1160 • C. The enhancement in the flexural strength of the experimental group samples is not proportional to increasing TiO 2 content.Instead, it initially increases and then decreases; this is consistent with the trends observed for the sample shrinkage rate and relative density.Microstructural analysis reveals that appropriate TiO 2 doping enhances the flexural strength of CUG-1A.However, excessive TiO 2 doping leads to an increase in liquid-phase content during the sintering process, thereby impeding gas discharge.With increasing sintering temperature, decomposed substances continuously generate gas, resulting in elevated trapped gas pressure within closed pores and, subsequently, leading to an augmentation in the number of closed pores.Consequently, both flexural strengths and relative densities of the samples decrease.
The flexural strength of T6 sintered at 1100 • C reaches the highest value of 136.66 ± 4.92 MPa, exhibiting a remarkable increase of 65% compared to that of T0.These results demonstrate the effectiveness of TiO 2 as an additive component in enhancing both relative density and flexural strength for lunar regolith structures.
of CUG-1A.However, excessive TiO2 doping leads to an increase in liquid-phase content during the sintering process, thereby impeding gas discharge.With increasing sintering temperature, decomposed substances continuously generate gas, resulting in elevated trapped gas pressure within closed pores and, subsequently, leading to an augmentation in the number of closed pores.Consequently, both flexural strengths and relative densities of the samples decrease.

Conclusions
This study proposes an effective method for enhancing the mechanical properties of lunar regolith samples.By varying the TiO 2 content in the CUG-1A lunar regolith simulant, CUG-1A-TiO 2 samples were fabricated, and the effects of TiO 2 content and sintering temperature on phase transformation and microstructure, as well as macroscopic properties such as shrinkage rate, flexural strength, and relative density were examined.The following conclusions were drawn.
Doping with TiO 2 can effectively enhance the mechanical properties of CUG-1A.The experimental results demonstrate that the experimental groups outperformed T0 in terms of relative density and flexural strength.Furthermore, with increasing TiO 2 content, the relative density and flexural strength initially increased and then decreased.On the one hand, doping with TiO 2 led to the formation of Fe 2 TiO 5 through a reaction with Fe 2 O 3 , thus reducing the generation and volatilization of solid solutions containing Fe or Mg with low melting points during heat treatment; this means that the addition of TiO 2 to a CUG-1A lunar regolith simulant system will produce considerable changes not only in the distribution of Fe but also in the distribution of Mg.Moreover, TiO 2 addition effectively decreased the viscosity and enhanced the fluidity of glass, facilitated mass transfer during heat treatment, and promoted pore shrinkage for enhanced mechanical properties.On the other hand, over-doping with TiO 2 severely reduced glass viscosity, resulting in the formation of impurities and sub-crystalline phases such as magnesium dititanate (MgTi 2 O 5 ), and the lower viscosity glass phase would deteriorate high-temperature mechanical properties.The sample exhibited optimal properties when sintered at 1100 • C with a TiO 2 content of 6 wt%.The average flexural strength and relative density of the samples were 136.66 ± 4.92 MPa and 91.06%, respectively, which were 65% and 12.28% higher than those of T0, respectively.Comparisons of the microstructures and relative densities of the sintered samples in the experimental groups and T0 revealed that doping with TiO 2 led to a reduction in the severity of defects and the formation of denser and more uniform microstructures.
This study represents a preliminary exploration of the impact of TiO 2 on the microstructure and flexural strength of lunar regolith.Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that the incorporation of TiO 2 exerts a substantial influence on certain elements, including magnesium and iron.Future research will focus on investigating the synergistic effects occurring in lunar regolith samples during heat treatment by considering compositional

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Specific surface area of T0 powder under different milling durations.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Specific surface area of T0 powder under different milling durations.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. XRD patterns of samples of each group at 1100 °C.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. XRD patterns of samples of each group at 1100 • C.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. XRD patterns of samples of each group at 1100 °C.

Figure 4 . 4 )Fe 2 5 )Fe 2 O 3 +
Figure 4. XRD patterns of samples of T6 at different sintering temperatures.The phase compositions of the air-sintered samples undergo significant changes, including the formation of Fe 2 O 3 , Fe 2 TiO 5 , and TiO 2 .According to the research conducted by Zhang et al. [43], the formation of ilmenite products during sintering is highly dependent on temperature.At temperatures ranging from 600 to 800 • C, ilmenite undergoes oxidation, converting ferrous iron to ferric iron, and new phases such as Fe 2 Ti 3 O 9 , Fe 2 O 3 , and TiO 2 emerge.However, the Fe 2 Ti 3 O 9 phase is metastable and disappears at temperatures above approximately 1000 • C, decomposing into Fe 2 TiO 5 and TiO 2 .At 1000 • C, Fe 2 TiO 5 begins

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.SEM images of the (a)-(h) polished and (i)-(l) fractured surfaces of the sample sintered a 1100 °C.(A-D region represents the designated area for EDS scanning.)

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.SEM images of the (a-h) polished and (i-l) fractured surfaces of the sample sintered at 1100 • C. (A-D region represents the designated area for EDS scanning.)

Figure 7 .Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Photos of the appearance of the samples after sintering.(a) 1050 °C T0; (b) 1160 °C T0; (c) 1050 °C T6; (d) 1160 °C T6. (For interpretation of the colors in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)Figure 7. Photos of the appearance of the samples after sintering.(a) 1050 • C T0; (b) 1160 • C T0; (c) 1050 • C T6; (d) 1160 • C T6. (For interpretation of the colors in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Evaluation of the sintering shrinkage (%) of samples at different sintering temperatures: (a) X-axis and (b) Z-axis.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Evaluation of the sintering shrinkage (%) of samples at different sintering temperatures: (a) X-axis and (b) Z-axis.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Evaluation of the sintering shrinkage (%) of samples at different sintering temperatures: (a) X-axis and (b) Z-axis.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Evaluation of the relative density (%) of samples at different sintering temperatures.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Evaluation of the relative density (%) of samples at different sintering temperatures.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Flexural strength (MPa) of samples at different sintering temperatures.Figure 10.Flexural strength (MPa) of samples at different sintering temperatures.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Flexural strength (MPa) of samples at different sintering temperatures.Figure 10.Flexural strength (MPa) of samples at different sintering temperatures.

Table 2 .
Detailed composition of raw materials according to different nucleating agent ratios (wt%).

Table 3 .
T0 and T6 powder particle size under different milling durations.

Table 4 .
EDS results of atomic composition in the scanned regions (A, B, C, and D) in Figure6.

Table 5 .
Evaluation of the bulk density (g/cm3) of samples at different sintering temperatures.

Table 6 .
Evaluation of the real density (g/cm3) of samples at different sintering temperatures.

Table 5 .
Evaluation of the bulk density (g/cm3) of samples at different sintering temperatures.