Synthesis, and Molecular Structure Investigations of a New s -Triazine Derivatives Incorporating Pyrazole/Piperidine/ Aniline Moieties

: In this work, we synthesized two new s -triazine incorporates pyrazole/piperidine/aniline moieties . Molecular structure investigations in the light of X-ray crystallography combined with Hirshfeld and DFT calculations were presented. Intermolecular interactions controlling the molecular packing of 4-(3,5-dimethyl-1 H -pyrazol-1-yl)- N -phenyl-6-(piperidin-1-yl)-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine; 5a and N -(4-bromophenyl)-4-(3,5-dimethyl-1 H -pyrazol-1-yl)-6-(piperidin-1-yl)-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine; 5b were analyzed using Hirshfeld calculations. The most dominant interactions are the H...H, N...H and H...C contacts in both compounds. The N...H and H...C interactions in 5a and the N...H, Br...H and H...H interactions in 5b are the most important. In addition, DFT calculations were used to compute the molecular structures of 5a and 5b ; then, their electronic properties, as well as the 1 H- and 13 C-NMR spectra, were predicted. Both compounds are polar where 5a (1.018 Debye) has lower dipole moment than 5b (4.249 Debye). The NMR chemical shifts were calculated and very good correlations between the calculated and experimental data were obtained (R 2 = 0.938–0.997).

A combination of the s-triazine privileged structure with other N-heterocycles such as pyrazoles [12][13][14] and quinazoline have raised a great of attention in cancer chemotherapeutics targeting enzyme inhibitors such as TK and EGFR inhibitors [15,16].
In addition, s-triazine core structure has gained attention in the pharmaceutical industry but has also had a great impact in the polymer industrial applications due to ease of functionalization and mechanical and thermal stability [17]. Indeed, this fascinating structure is exploited in the metal-organic framework (MOFs) [18] as well as the storage and capture of carbon dioxide chemistry [19][20][21].
Several examples that have been reported in the literature have showed that replacement of the three chlorine atoms in the 2,4,6-trichlorotriazine (TCT) with different N-heterocycles or amines are an important task and exhibited several applications [22][23][24] (Figure 1). For example, El-Faham et al. have been designed and synthesized in a series of striazine hybrids comprising mon-/di-pyrazolyl along with piperidine moiety, which were subsequently assessed in vitro towards cancer activity and also in vivo toxicity in zebrafish embryos [25] (Compound I, Figure 1).
Matthew A. Sanders et al., have reported a tri-substituted s-triazine as a novel and lead compound TZ9 (Figure 1) for selective RAD6B inhibitory activity and cellular anticancer activity [26]. El-Hamamsy and co-workers have been designed and synthesized a new scaffold-based, s-triazine-targeting hDHFR for lung cancer treatment. Compound II was found to have significant activity compared to methotrexate against the A549 cancer cell line [27]. Prashanth et al., reported novel lead compounds based on s-triazine tethered pyrazole moiety as a potential anti-cancer agent targeting EFGR kinase inhibitors with IC50 = 229.4 nm (Compound III, Figure 1) [28]. Additionally, the Singh research team have reported a new series of hybrids derived from monastrol-1,3,5-triazine and were studied in vitro and in vivo for their anti-cancer activity. The results indicated the potential efficacy of compound IV against cancer via inhibition of EGFR-TK ( Figure 1) [29].
Therefore, the synthesis of new s-triazine derivatives connected to different amines such as aniline, piperidine, or heterocycles, such as pyrazole rings, could be useful for the drug discovery or as a new material for different applications.
In continuation of this research program towards the synthesis of s-triazine core structure with different moieties for biological activity applications. We reported here, the synthesis and characterization of two new compounds based on an s-triazine privileged structure having three different moieties such pyrazole, piperidine, and an aniline derivative. The chemical insights of the new compounds were explored via combined experimental and computational investigations.
Compounds 2a,b and 3a,b, which were required for this study, were prepared according to reported literature [25]. The synthetic pathway for the desired compounds are depicted in Scheme 1. Scheme 1. Synthesis of a new hits tethered pyrazole/piperidine/aniline-based s-triazine privileged structure.

General procedure (GP1) for the synthesis of compounds 4a,b
For the synthesis of monohydrazino s-triazine derivatives, 4a,b excess hydrazine hydrate-80% (5.0 equiv.) was added dropwise to a solution of disubstituted s-triazine derivative 3a,b (1.0 equiv.) in refluxing ethanol overnight, the evolution of the reaction was monitored by TLC (ethyl acetate/hexane 3:7). After completion of the reaction, the solution was cooled, and the precipitate was filtered and washed with diethyl ether to afford monohydrazino s-triazine derivatives as white solids in a very good yield and purity. Spectroscopic data fully agreed with the proposed structures. All monohydrazino s-triazine derivatives were used directly without further purification in the next step to synthesize the corresponding pyrazolo s-triazene derivatives.

N-(4-Bromophenyl)-4-hydrazinyl-6-(piperidin-1-yl)-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine
The reaction of N-(4-bromophenyl)-4-chloro-6-(piperidin-1-yl)-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine 3b (1.843 g, 5.00 mmol) and excess hydrazine hydrate (1.26 mL, 25.0 mmol) in refluxing ethanol (35 mL) was carried out according to the general procedure (GP1). After 12 h, the TLC analysis (ethyl acetate/hexane 3:7) provided evidence that the desired hydrazine derivative 4b was produced in its pure form. Ethanol and excess hydrazine were evaporated by vacuo as a part of work up procedure followed by an addition of 15 mL of n-hexane to the product as a white precipitate, which was collected by filtration (1.  For the synthesis of mono-pyrazole s-triazine derivatives 5a,b, a solution of acetyl acetone (1.2 equiv.) in DMF was added to a stirring solution of monohydrazino s-triazene derivative 4a,b (1 equivalent) in DMF at rt. The reaction mixture was treated with triethylamine (0.8 equiv.) and was allowed to reflux while stirring overnight. It was noticed that the reactivity of bromo-hydrazino s-triazine derivative 5b was relatively lower than that of the other hydrazino s-triazine derivatives, which required starting with excess amounts of acetylacetone (1.8 equiv.) and triethylamine (1.2 equiv.) for each equivalent of 4b. After completion of the reaction as identified by TLC analysis (ethyl acetate/hexane 5:5), it was allowed to cool down to rt., and then a small amount of ice-cold water was added with continuous stirring for 30 min. Thereafter, the reaction mixture was placed into an ice bath for 1 h and the precipitate of the product was separated by filtration and washed with several portions of ice-cold water and then dried overnight under vacuum to afford the product a very good yield. Some of the final products needed further purification by column chromatography on silica gel (gradient 20-60% EtOAc in hexane).

Compound 5a was recrystallized from ethanol:
About 15 mL of absolute ethanol was added to compound 5a and the mixture was heated gently until the entire amount dissolved completely. Thereafter, the solution was allowed to cool at rt. overnight to afford the product its crystalline form.

Compound 5b was recrystallized from DCM/Diethyl ether:
Compound 5b was dissolved in about 10 mL of DCM with gentle heating until the dissolution was complete, then a layer of diethyl ether (50 mL) was allowed to slide through the flask. The crystals of compound 5b were collected after 48 h.

Crystal structure determination
The technical experimental method for the mounting data and solved the chemical structures [30][31][32][33] are amended in the Supplementary Materials (SI). The crystallographic details are summarized in Table 1.

Chemistry
The target s-triazine hybridized structures with different moieties have been synthesized, as shown in Scheme 1. Insertion of the aniline derivative was carried out initially via reaction of 2,4,6-trichlorotriazine (TCT) with the substituted aniline at 0-5 °C for 2-3 h. Subsequently, the second reactive chlorine atom was replaced by the piperidine moiety in acetone-water as a solvent at 0 °C to rt. overnight. Next, the least reactive chlorine atom was replaced with hydrazine. Finally, the hydrazine derivative was cyclized with acetyl acetone to afford the last pyrazole moiety in DMF under reflux condition. The chemical features of the synthesized s-triazine having different three moieties were assigned and confirmed via NMR, IR, and a single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis technique.

Crystal Structure Description
The X-ray structure of 5a showing atom numbering and thermal ellipsoids drawn at 30% probability level is shown in Figure 2A. The compound crystallized in the orthorhombic system and Pbca space group with unit cell parameters of a = 11.49940(10) Å, b = 14.91530(10) Å, and c = 21.10870(10) Å ( Table 1). The unit cell volume is 3620.50(4) Å 3 with Z = 8, and one molecule as asymmetric unit. The structure comprised three rings connected with the s-triazine core, which are the aminophenyl, pyrazolyl, and morpholine moieties. The morpholine moiety occurred in the chair form and the mean plane passing through the s-triazine core makes angles of 17.27 and 14.71° with the phenyl and pyrazolyl moieties, respectively. Selected bond lengths and angles are listed in Table 2.
The molecular structure of 5a is stabilized by C-H…N intramolecular hydrogen bond between the one C-H bond from the phenyl moiety as hydrogen bond donor and the neighbouring nitrogen atom from the s-triazine core. The donor-acceptor distance of the C-H…N intramolecular hydrogen bond is 2.9366(13) Å. The intramolecular C-H…N and the intermolecular N-H…N hydrogen bond contacts are shown in Figure 2B as turquoise and red dotted lines, respectively. Viewing of the supramolecular structure of 5a is shown in Figure 2C, while the hydrogen bond parameters are depicted in Table 3.   (13) On the other hand, compound 5b in the orthorhombic system and Pbcn space group with unit cell parameters of a = 37.4570(3) Å, b = 8.62930(10) Å, and c = 24.8053(2) Å ( Table  1). The unit cell volume is 8017.76(13) Å 3 with Z = 16 and two molecules as an asymmetric unit. The structure of the two molecular units of 5b is shown in Figure 3A,B. Moreover, the structure comprised three rings connected with the s-triazine core, which are the pbromoaminophenyl, pyrazolyl, and morpholine moieties. The morpholine moiety also occurred in the chair form. In this case, the twists of the phenyl ring moiety from the mean plane passing through the s-triazine core are found more than in 5a in unit A (29.44°) and less in unit B (10.46°). The corresponding values for the pyrazolyl moiety are 8.22 and 7.17°, respectively. Moreover, the molecular structure of the two units in 5b is stabilized by slightly shorter C-H…N intramolecular interactions, with a donor-acceptor distance of 2.887(2) and 2.870(2) Å for C5-H5…N2 and C5b-H5b…N2B interactions, respectively. The packing of this compound is controlled by a number of C-H…N, N-H…N and C-H…Br hydrogen bonds (Table 3 and Figure 3C). Viewing of the packing scheme of 5b is shown in Figure  3D.

Analysis of Molecular Packing
The intermolecular interactions play important role in the crystal stability. In this regard, the different contacts in the crystal structures of 5a and 5b were analysed with the aid of Hirshfeld calculations. These contacts and their percentages are summarized in Figure 4. For 5a, the structure contains three elements which are C, H, and N. Hence, the C…C, C…H, C…N, H…H, N…H and N…N are the only possible contacts. Of these interactions, only five contacts occurred, which are H…C, H…H and N…H. Their percentages are 22.2, 58.4, and 19.0%, respectively. Hence, the H…H, N…H and H…C contacts are the most dominant. Among these contacts, the N…H and H…C are the most important, based on the dnorm map shown in Figure 5. These are the only contacts which appeared as red regions, indicating shorter distances than the van der Waals (vdWs) radii sum of the interacting atoms.  Another piece of evidence which confirms the importance of these contacts is the sharp spikes that appeared in the decomposed fingerprint plots of the N…H and H…C contacts. The sharp spikes indicate significantly short interactions ( Figure 6). Summary of the short N…H and H…C interactions having distances smaller than the vdWs radii sum of the interacting atoms are listed in Table 4.  The structure of 5b comprised an extra Br atom attached at the 4-position of the phenyl ring. Hence, more intermolecular interactions were detected in this compound ( Figure  4). Since there are two different molecular units per asymmetric formula, there are two sets of results for this molecular system. Based on Hirshfeld calculations, and similar to 5a, the H…H, N…H and H…C are the most dominant contacts. In addition, there is significant amount of Br…H contacts. The H12B…C8 (2.632 Å), N5…H1B (2.055 Å), H4B…H4B (1.795 Å), and Br1B…H10C (2.902 Å) are the shortest contacts, respectively. All four of these contacts appeared as a red region in the dnorm map ( Figure 5). An important difference between the two molecular units of 5b is that the Br…H and H…H interactions are more important in the molecular unit with the letter B in the atom numbering than the other unit. Moreover, the percentages of the H…H, Br…H, and H…C contacts are also different in both units (Figure 7).

DFT studies Optimized Geometry
The calculated optimized structures of 5a and 5b agreed very well with the reported X-ray structures, as indicated from the excellent matching between them (Figure 8) as well as the excellent correlations between the calculated and experimental bond distances and angles (Figure 9). In addition, the differences between the calculated and experimental bond distances are found to not exceed 0.01 Å (Table S1; Supplementary data). Moreover, the correlation coefficients (R 2 ) are calculated to be very close to unity (Figure 9). Some higher deviations occurred in the bond angles, which could be attributed to the relaxation of the molecular structure as a consequence of the geometry optimization in the absence of the crystal packing effect. Generally, the differences between the calculated and experimental bond angles did not exceed 2.8˚ (Table S1; Supplementary data).   (Table S1; Supplementary data).
Both of the studied systems comprised CHN backbone and differ only in the substituent attached to the phenyl moiety. Graphical presentations of the natural charges at the different atomic sites are shown in Figure 10. The N atoms of the triazine core and the aniline moiety are more electronegative than the N-atoms of pyrazolyl and piperidinyl moieties in both compounds (Table S2; Supplementary data). The C-atoms of the CH3 groups are the most electronegative C-sites. In contrast, all C-atoms bonded to nitrogen have high positive charge. Of C-atoms, the s-triazine C-atoms are the most electropositive, as these carbons found located between two nitrogen sites in the s-triazine moiety. Moreover, all hydrogen sites have a positive charge where the NH protons are the most positively charged. The natural charge values are calculated to be 0.434 and 0.443 e for 5a and 5b, respectively. In the right part of Figure 11, the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) maps of both compounds are shown. The red regions are related to the atomic sites with high electron density, while the blue regions are related to the atomic sites with lowest electron density, which represents the most possible sites as hydrogen bond acceptor and donors, respectively. Both compounds are polar molecules with net dipole moment of 1.018 and 4.249 Debye for 5a and 5b, respectively. The compound with bromo substituent at the phenyl ring (5b) has a higher polarity than the one with an unsubstituted phenyl ring (5a). The substituent has also a great effect on the direction of the dipole moment vector, as can be seen from Figure 11 (left part). Moreover, the substituent at the phenyl moiety has a direct impact on the distribution of the HOMO and LUMO levels on the studied molecular systems. In case of 5a, the HOMO level is mainly located over the s-triazine core and the piperidinyl fragment, while the LUMO is distributed over the π-system of the s-triazine core, phenyl, and pyrazolyl moieties. In this case, the HOMO-LUMO energy gap is calculated to be 4.917 eV. On the other hand, the HOMO and LUMO are mainly located over the phenyl moiety in case of 5b. The HOMO has some distribution over the s-triazine core, where the HOMO-LUMO energy gap is slightly less in 5b (4.804 eV) compared to 5a.

NMR Spectra
The calculated HNMR and CNMR chemical shifts by empolying GIAO method and final data are listed in Supplementary Materials in Tables S3 and S4. Figure 12 presented the correlations between computed NMR chemical shifts with experimental data. As we observed from the presented graphs, the correlation coefficients (R 2 ) are high and close to 1. The R 2 values range from 0.93 to 0.94, indicating the close agreement between the computed and experimental results.

Conclusions
Two new hybrids tethered pyrazole/piperidine/aniline moieties-based s-triazine privileged structure were synthesized in a high chemical yield using a very simple and efficient method. The supramolecular structures of 5a and 5b were quantitatively determined using Hirshfeld analysis. The calculated structures using DFT B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) agreed very well with the experimental X-ray geometries. Moreover, calculated NMR spectra are found in very good correlations with the experimental data. These compounds well be further explored by our groups with other derivatives in the near future for their biological applications.