Broadband Plasmonic Nanopolarizer Based on Di ﬀ erent Surface Plasmon Resonance Modes in a Silver Nanorod

: Conventional polarizers including sheet, wire-grid, prism, and Brewster-angle type polarizers are not easily integrated with photonic circuits. Polarizing elements on the nanoscale are indispensable for integrated all-optical nanophotonic devices. Here, we propose a plasmonic nanopolarizer based on a silver nanorod. The polarization characteristics result from the excitation of di ﬀ erent resonance modes of localized surface plasmons (LSPs) at di ﬀ erent wavelengths. Furthermore, the polarization characteristics in near ﬁeld regions have been demonstrated by the electric ﬁeld distribution of the nanorod based on ﬁnite-di ﬀ erence time-domain (FDTD) simulation, indicating a strong local resonant cavity with a standing wave mode for transverse electric (TE) polarization and weak electric ﬁelds distributed for transverse magnetic (TM) polarization. The nanopolarizer can e ﬃ ciently work in the near ﬁeld region, exhibiting a nanopolarization e ﬀ ect. In addition, very high extinction ratios and extremely low insertion losses can be achieved. Particularly, the nanopolarizer can work in a broadband from visible to near-infrared wavelengths, which can be tuned by changing the aspect ratio of the nanorod. The plasmonic nanopolarizer is a promising candidate for potential applications in the integration of nanophotonic devices and circuits.


Introduction
With the rapid development of information and communication techniques, data transmission rates with ultra-high speed greatly require increasing integration of photonic devices and circuits, and there are growing demands for the miniaturization and high performance of photonic devices. Polarization plays a key role in components such as switches, isolators, and modulators. However, conventional polarizing elements such as sheet polarizers by anisotropic absorption, wire-grid polarizer by anisotropic reflection, prism polarizer by refraction, and Brewster-angle polarizer by reflection near the Brewster angle [1], are not easily integrated with photonic circuits. To miniaturize the polarizing elements, micropolarizers have been developed by using in-line fibers [2][3][4][5], photonic crystals [6][7][8][9], nanowire-grids [10][11][12][13][14], plasmonic structures [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], and metasurfaces [23,24], etc, wherein the polarizers based on the plasmonic structures have been widely reported due to their high performance in recent years. For example, a band-selective polarizer by diffraction gratings consisting of periodically distributed gold nanowires has been presented, where the extinction ratio can be enhanced significantly by high-efficiency secondary diffraction [16]. Moreover, a broadband reflective and absorptive polarizer with large transmittance difference for orthogonally linearly polarized incident light in the visible range has been designed using multi-scaled Ag nano wire-slit arrays [20]. Recently, an ultrahigh extinction ratio and extremely short length resonant integrated optic transverse electric (TE) pass polarizer were proposed theoretically, which was based on the interaction between the short range surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) and the mode guided by a dielectric waveguide [21]. Additionally, hybrid plasmonic waveguides based on TE pass polarizers have been designed by multilayer structures of a metal layer, dielectric spacer, and silicon-on-insulator, which exhibited high efficient polarization properties due to the mode coupling between SPPs and the dielectric waveguide [18,19,22]. It has been noted that the structures of the plasmonic polarizers are still complex and the component size is basically on the micrometer scale.
Since the micrometer-scale bulky components of photonic devices have limited the integration of these components on a much small scale further [25], nanophotonic components based on surface plasmons beyond the diffraction limit can make them ideal candidates for the integration of photonic devices on the nanometer scale [26][27][28][29][30]. In this case, the polarizing components on the nanoscale (i.e., nanopolarizers) are indispensable for their future applications.
It is noted that silver nanorods with a periodic arrangement have presented some significant properties and applications such as plasmonic waveguides with symmetric and antisymmetric modes [31], multiple electromagnetic responses to visible and near infrared (NIR ) wavelengths [32], and resonance cavities [30]. In this work, we theoretically investigated a broadband nanopolarizer based on a plasmonic nanorod. The nanopolarizer exhibited highly efficient polarization properties, which stems from the excitation of different resonance modes of localized surface plasmons (LSPs) in the nanorod at different wavelengths. The polarization behavior in near field regions has been explored based on finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation; for the first time, a nanopolarization effect was demonstrated in the plasmonic nanorod, and particularly demonstrated that the nanopolarizer could efficiently work in the near field region close to the source edge (distance within 30 nm). Furthermore, the polarization properties were strongly dependent on the size parameters of the plasmonic nanorod and the near field range. Consequently, high extinction ratios and extremely low insertion losses at the visible to near-infrared wavelengths can be achieved by tuning the nanorod sizes.

Extinction Properties of a Plasmonic Nanorod
Here we considered a single plasmonic nanorod (e.g., silver nanorod). When a light wave impinges on the surface of the silver nanorod at normal incidence along the y-direction (Figure 1), the electric polarization field is produced under the applied field, in this case [33]: where D is the electric displacement; E is the macroscopic field inside the nanorod; P is the electric polarization per unit volume; and ε is the dielectric constant of silver. Moreover, the macroscopic field inside the nanorod is given by where E 0 is the electric field of the incident light, and the polarization directions of TE and TM waves are along the z-and x-directions, respectively. L j (j = z, x) is the Lorentz depolarization factor when E 0 is parallel and perpendicular to the long axis of the nanorod, respectively. It has been noted that the lower order mode (i.e., dipole) of LSPs is only excited when the nanostructure is very short (e.g., less Crystals 2020, 10, 447 3 of 15 than 280 nm) [35,36]. When considering the small nanorod compared to the wavelength, based on the dipole approximation, the electrostatic formula takes the form [34] where p is the dipole moment of the silver nanorod in the electric field; V denotes the volume of the silver nanorod; and α j is the polarizability tensor parallel (j = z) and perpendicular (j = x) to the long axis of the nanorod. In terms of Equations (1)-(3), the polarizability tensor takes the form Crystals 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 15 when 0 E is parallel and perpendicular to the long axis of the nanorod, respectively. It has been noted that the lower order mode (i.e., dipole) of LSPs is only excited when the nanostructure is very short (e.g., less than 280 nm) [35,36]. When considering the small nanorod compared to the wavelength, based on the dipole approximation, the electrostatic formula takes the form [34] where p is the dipole moment of the silver nanorod in the electric field; V denotes the volume of the silver nanorod; and j α is the polarizability tensor parallel (j = z) and perpendicular (j = x) to the long axis of the nanorod. In terms of Equations (1)-(3), the polarizability tensor takes the form Figure 1. Schematic illustration of a single silver nanorod when the incident light impinges on the surface of the nanorod at normal incidence along the y-direction, where the z-direction is parallel to the long axis of the nanorod with a length of 2a and diameter of 2b. TE and TM correspond to the transverse electric and transverse magnetic polarized waves, respectively.
Note that the polarizability tensor depends on the Lorentz depolarization factor, which is closely related to the polarization direction of incident light. When the polarization direction (or the applied electric field) is parallel to the long axis of the nanorod (along the z-direction, Figure 1), we have [37]  where 2a and 2b correspond to the length and diameter of the nanorod, and for a > b, we have When the polarization direction is perpendicular to the long axis of the nanorod, we have  Figure 1. Schematic illustration of a single silver nanorod when the incident light impinges on the surface of the nanorod at normal incidence along the y-direction, where the z-direction is parallel to the long axis of the nanorod with a length of 2a and diameter of 2b. TE and TM correspond to the transverse electric and transverse magnetic polarized waves, respectively.
Note that the polarizability tensor depends on the Lorentz depolarization factor, which is closely related to the polarization direction of incident light. When the polarization direction (or the applied electric field) is parallel to the long axis of the nanorod (along the z-direction, Figure 1), we have [37] where 2a and 2b correspond to the length and diameter of the nanorod, and for a > b, we have When the polarization direction is perpendicular to the long axis of the nanorod, we have Furthermore, the extinction cross section C ext,j (j = z, x) can be expressed as the sum of the absorption cross section C abs,j and the scattering cross section C sca, j C ext,j = C abs,j + C sca,j Considering that the nanorod diameter is very small compared with those wavelengths, according to the Rayleigh approximation [34], we have C abs,j = 4πkIm(α j ) (9) Crystals 2020, 10, 447 4 of 15 The wavenumber k can be expressed as k = 2π/λ, where λ is the wavelength of the incident wave in vacuum. For the nanorod, the extinction coefficient can be given by The transmittance has the conventional form of the exponential extinction law where I t,j and I 0 are the light intensity of the transmittance and incidence, respectively. The extinction Ext j (j = z, x) can be written as In terms of Equations (8)- (11), Equation (13) can be expressed as The extinction spectra can be numerically simulated based on Equation (14), where the dielectric constants of silver are obtained from the compilations of Lynch and Hunter [38]. Figure 2 shows the calculated extinction spectra of the silver nanorod with a diameter of 30 nm and a length of 100 nm for the transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) polarized waves at normal incidence. When the polarization direction is parallel to the long axis of the nanorod (TE polarized wave), a very strong extinction peak appears at 517 nm due to the longitudinal resonance mode of LSPs. Nevertheless, when the polarization direction is perpendicular to the long axis (TM polarized wave), a weak extinction peak is observed due to the transversal mode that occurs at 340 nm. Additionally, the longitudinal resonance appears at a much longer wavelength, while the transversal resonance occurs at a shorter wavelength. It was demonstrated that the nanorod dramatically attenuates the light polarized parallel to the long axis at the wavelength of 517 nm, however, the nanorod strongly transmitted the light polarized perpendicular to the axis due to the week Rayleigh scattering at the 517 nm wavelength, which indicated an obvious polarization characteristic. The wavenumber k can be expressed as k = 2π/λ, where λ is the wavelength of the incident wave in vacuum. For the nanorod, the extinction coefficient can be given by The transmittance has the conventional form of the exponential extinction law The extinction spectra can be numerically simulated based on Equation (14), where the dielectric constants of silver are obtained from the compilations of Lynch and Hunter [38]. Figure 2 shows the calculated extinction spectra of the silver nanorod with a diameter of 30 nm and a length of 100 nm for the transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) polarized waves at normal incidence. When the polarization direction is parallel to the long axis of the nanorod (TE polarized wave), a very strong extinction peak appears at 517 nm due to the longitudinal resonance mode of LSPs. Nevertheless, when the polarization direction is perpendicular to the long axis (TM polarized wave), a weak extinction peak is observed due to the transversal mode that occurs at 340 nm. Additionally, the longitudinal resonance appears at a much longer wavelength, while the transversal resonance occurs at a shorter wavelength. It was demonstrated that the nanorod dramatically attenuates the light polarized parallel to the long axis at the wavelength of 517 nm, however, the nanorod strongly transmitted the light polarized perpendicular to the axis due to the week Rayleigh scattering at the 517 nm wavelength, which indicated an obvious polarization characteristic.

Simulation of Nanopolarization Characteristics in Near Field Region of the Plasmonic Nanorod
The polarization characteristics of the plasmonic nanorod with a 30 nm diameter and a 100 nm length was explored in near field regions by electric field distributions based on a 3D FDTD solutions with Lumerical package. Here, the refractive index of silver was selected in the material data from Ag (silver)-Palik (0-2 µm), the material fit had the tolerance of 10 −5 , and the max coefficient of 6. The total field scattered field (TFSF) method was used for investigating the near field distribution of the plasmonic nanorod with the PML boundary condition in the x-, y-, and z-directions. The mesh refinement was conformal variant 0 and the mesh override region covered the x-, y-, and z-mesh of 0.5 nm, 0.5 nm, and 1 nm, respectively. The injection direction of the TFSF source (with the wavelength range of 300 to 900 nm) with TE and TM polarizations was perpendicular to the long axis of the nanorod (along the y-direction) (Figure 3), where different types of monitors (such as the 2D z-normal monitor (x-y plane) and 2D y-normal monitor (x-z plane)) were selected to analyze the electric field distributions in different near field regions. The y-normal monitor that collected the electric field in x-z plane was put onto different positions with different y values of 31, 34, 37, 40, 45, 50, 60, 80, and 100 nm. The polarization characteristics of the plasmonic nanorod with a 30 nm diameter and a 100 nm length was explored in near field regions by electric field distributions based on a 3D FDTD solutions with Lumerical package. Here, the refractive index of silver was selected in the material data from Ag (silver)-Palik (0-2 μm), the material fit had the tolerance of 10 −5 , and the max coefficient of 6. The total field scattered field (TFSF) method was used for investigating the near field distribution of the plasmonic nanorod with the PML boundary condition in the x-, y-, and z-directions. The mesh refinement was conformal variant 0 and the mesh override region covered the x-, y-, and z-mesh of 0.5 nm, 0.5 nm, and 1 nm, respectively. The injection direction of the TFSF source (with the wavelength range of 300 to 900 nm) with TE and TM polarizations was perpendicular to the long axis of the nanorod (along the y-direction) (Figure 3), where different types of monitors (such as the 2D z-normal monitor (x-y plane) and 2D y-normal monitor (x-z plane)) were selected to analyze the electric field distributions in different near field regions. The y-normal monitor that collected the electric field in x-z plane was put onto different positions with different y values of 31, 34, 37, 40, 45, 50, 60, 80, and 100 nm. silver nanorod when the incident TFSF source impinges on the nanorod surface at normal incidence along the y-direction (marked by the pink arrow), TE and TM polarizations are correspondingly denoted by the blue arrow and the red dot in the y-z plane. Both x-and y-span ranges were −15 nm to 15 nm and the z-span range of the nanorod was −50 nm to 50 nm. The simulation geometry with a mesh accuracy of 7 corresponded to the values: x = y = z = 0 and the x-, y-, and z-spans were 1100 nm, 1100 nm, and 1200 nm, respectively. Both x-and y-span ranges of the TFSF source were −30 nm to 30 nm and the z-span range was -80 nm to 80 nm. Figure 4 displays the electric field distributions of the plasmonic nanorod with the TE and TM polarizations of the incident light. It was found that the electric fields are obviously dependent on the polarization directions of the incident light (Figure 4a,c). For the TE polarization, the longitudinal resonance mode (L-mode) of the LSPs was excited at the wavelength of 517 nm, where it was noted that the electric field in the x-z plane is dominantly localized at the two ends of the nanorod (Figure 4b), and the electric field for the L-mode indicates a local resonant cavity with the standing wave mode, which results in the strong attenuation of the incident light with the polarization along the z-direction. In contrast, for the TM polarization, the transversal resonance mode (T-mode) of the LSPs was excited at a short wavelength (e.g., 340 nm). Since the resonance wavelength of the T-mode is very far from that of the L-mode, the electric field at the 517 nm wavelength displayed weak intensity and was mainly distributed at the rim of the nanorod along the x-direction (Figure 4c,d). As a result, the nanorod strongly transmits the incident light with the y z y=31∼100 nm Nanorod TFSF Source PML Monitors Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation domain of the silver nanorod when the incident TFSF source impinges on the nanorod surface at normal incidence along the y-direction (marked by the pink arrow), TE and TM polarizations are correspondingly denoted by the blue arrow and the red dot in the y-z plane. Both x-and y-span ranges were −15 nm to 15 nm and the z-span range of the nanorod was −50 nm to 50 nm. The simulation geometry with a mesh accuracy of 7 corresponded to the values: x = y = z = 0 and the x-, y-, and z-spans were 1100 nm, 1100 nm, and 1200 nm, respectively. Both x-and y-span ranges of the TFSF source were −30 nm to 30 nm and the z-span range was -80 nm to 80 nm. Figure 4 displays the electric field distributions of the plasmonic nanorod with the TE and TM polarizations of the incident light. It was found that the electric fields are obviously dependent on the polarization directions of the incident light (Figure 4a,c). For the TE polarization, the longitudinal resonance mode (L-mode) of the LSPs was excited at the wavelength of 517 nm, where it was noted that the electric field in the x-z plane is dominantly localized at the two ends of the nanorod (Figure 4b), and the electric field for the L-mode indicates a local resonant cavity with the standing wave mode, which results in the strong attenuation of the incident light with the polarization along the z-direction. In contrast, for the TM polarization, the transversal resonance mode (T-mode) of the LSPs was excited at a short wavelength (e.g., 340 nm). Since the resonance wavelength of the T-mode is very far from that of the L-mode, the electric field at the 517 nm wavelength displayed weak intensity and was mainly distributed at the rim of the nanorod along the x-direction (Figure 4c,d). As a result, the nanorod strongly transmits the incident light with the polarization along the x-direction. Thus, the plasmonic nanorod can be worked as a polarizing element at the resonance wavelength of the L-mode.
Crystals 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 15 polarization along the x-direction. Thus, the plasmonic nanorod can be worked as a polarizing element at the resonance wavelength of the L-mode. Furthermore, the polarization behavior in the near field area of the plasmonic nanorod can be demonstrated by the scattered fields in the x-z planes located at different near field regions. According to the TFSF technique, it has been noted that the scattered fields exceed the boundary of the TFSF source with a y-span range from −30 nm to 30 nm. Figure 5 illustrates the electric field distributions of the plasmonic nanorod in the x-z planes with different positions away from the source boundary (y = 30 nm) for the L-mode of LSPs, which is excited by the TE polarized wave (along the z-direction). Considering that the near field region in the x-z plane (y = 31 nm) is very close to the source edge (y = 30 nm), it was found that the L-mode exhibited a very strong resonant cavity mode at the two ends of the nanorod along the z-direction (Figure 5a). When the distance between the position of the y-normal monitor related to the nanorod center (e.g., y = 31, 34, 37, 40, 45, 50, and 60 nm) and the source edge (y = 30 nm) increased gradually from 1, 4, 7, 10, 20, to 30 nm (Figure 5a-f), the resonance intensity of the cavity mode reduced sharply; furthermore, the electric field became very weak when the distance was larger than 50 nm (y = 80 nm), and almost disappeared for the distance of 70 nm (y = 100 nm). As a result, for the TE polarization, the plasmonic nanorod exhibited the obvious extinction behavior only in the near field region localized in the range within the distance of 30 nm away from the source edge along the incident direction. electric field profiles of E(x, y) and E(x, z) at 517 nm for the TE polarization in terms of a 2D z-normal monitor (z = 0) and a 2D y-normal monitor (y = 0), respectively; (c) and (d) correspond to the electric field profiles of E(x, y) and E(x, z) at 517 nm for the TM polarization based on a 2D z-normal monitor (z = 0) and a 2D y-normal monitor (y = 0), respectively. Furthermore, the polarization behavior in the near field area of the plasmonic nanorod can be demonstrated by the scattered fields in the x-z planes located at different near field regions. According to the TFSF technique, it has been noted that the scattered fields exceed the boundary of the TFSF source with a y-span range from −30 nm to 30 nm. Figure 5 illustrates the electric field distributions of the plasmonic nanorod in the x-z planes with different positions away from the source boundary (y = 30 nm) for the L-mode of LSPs, which is excited by the TE polarized wave (along the z-direction). Considering that the near field region in the x-z plane (y = 31 nm) is very close to the source edge (y = 30 nm), it was found that the L-mode exhibited a very strong resonant cavity mode at the two ends of the nanorod along the z-direction (Figure 5a). When the distance between the position of the y-normal monitor related to the nanorod center (e.g., y = 31, 34, 37, 40, 45, 50, and 60 nm) and the source edge (y = 30 nm) increased gradually from 1, 4, 7, 10, 20, to 30 nm (Figure 5a-f), the resonance intensity of the cavity mode reduced sharply; furthermore, the electric field became very weak when the distance was larger than 50 nm (y = 80 nm), and almost disappeared for the distance of 70 nm (y = 100 nm). As a result, for the TE polarization, the plasmonic nanorod exhibited the obvious extinction behavior only in the near field region localized in the range within the distance of 30 nm away from the source edge along the incident direction.
Crystals 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 15 On the other hand, since the resonance wavelength of the T-mode is very far from that of the L-mode, for the incident light polarized perpendicular to the long axis of the nanorod (along the x-direction), the electric fields at the resonance wavelength of the L-mode were quite weak in the near field regions ( Figure 6), nevertheless, when the distance between the y-normal monitor (e.g., y = 31, 34, 37, 40, 45, 50, and 60 nm) and the source edge (y = 30 nm) increased from 1, 4, 7, 10, 20, to 30 nm (Figure 6a-f), the electric fields polarized along the x-direction became weak and presented different geometry profiles with the distance. Additionally, their intensities were very weak with an increase in the distance (e.g., 50 and 70 nm). It is obvious that the plasmonic nanorod displayed the optical fields distributed in the near field range for the TM polarization. Based on the electric field distributions in the near field area for the TE and TM polarized waves, as described above, it was revealed that the plasmonic nanorod performed the polarization characteristics in the near field region with a distance within 30 nm from the source edge or 45 nm from the nanorod edge along the incident direction, that is, the plasmonic nanorod presented the polarization effect in the nanometer space, which is a nanopolarization effect, thus the plasmonic nanorod can serve as a nanopolarizer working in the specific near field range. On the other hand, since the resonance wavelength of the T-mode is very far from that of the L-mode, for the incident light polarized perpendicular to the long axis of the nanorod (along the x-direction), the electric fields at the resonance wavelength of the L-mode were quite weak in the near field regions (Figure 6), nevertheless, when the distance between the y-normal monitor (e.g., y = 31, 34, 37, 40, 45, 50, and 60 nm) and the source edge (y = 30 nm) increased from 1, 4, 7, 10, 20, to 30 nm (Figure 6a-f), the electric fields polarized along the x-direction became weak and presented different geometry profiles with the distance. Additionally, their intensities were very weak with an increase in the distance (e.g., 50 and 70 nm). It is obvious that the plasmonic nanorod displayed the optical fields distributed in the near field range for the TM polarization. Based on the electric field distributions in the near field area for the TE and TM polarized waves, as described above, it was revealed that the plasmonic nanorod performed the polarization characteristics in the near field region with a distance within 30 nm from the source edge or 45 nm from the nanorod edge along the incident direction, that is, the plasmonic nanorod presented the polarization effect in the nanometer space, which is a nanopolarization effect, thus the plasmonic nanorod can serve as a nanopolarizer working in the specific near field range. In contrast, for the TM polarized light, the T-mode of LSPs was excited at a short wavelength, corresponding to the extinction peak at 340 nm, while the extinction at 340 nm was very weak for the TE polarized light since the resonance wavelength of the L-mode was very far from that of the T-mode. Therefore, the plasmonic nanorod can be worked as a polarizer at the resonance wavelength of the T-mode. Figure 7 illustrates the electric field distributions of the plasmonic nanorod in the x-z planes with different positions away from the source boundary (y = 30 nm) for the T-mode of LSPs, which is excited by the TM polarized wave (along the x-direction). For the near field region in the x-z plane (y = 31 nm) very close to the source edge (y = 30 nm), it was found that the T-mode exhibited a strong resonance along the short axis of the nanorod (along the x-direction), and the electric field was distributed at the rim of the nanorod along the x-direction (Figure 7a). When the distance between the position of the y-normal monitor and the source edge (y = 30 nm) increased gradually from 1, 4, 7, 10, 15, 20, to 30nm (Figure 7a-g), the resonance intensity of the T-mode reduced sharply. Moreover, the electric field became very weak when the distance was larger than 50 nm (y = 80 and 100 nm). In this case, for the TM polarization, the nanorod working at the resonance wavelength of the T-mode exhibited extinction behavior only in the near field region localized in the range within the distance of 30 nm away from the source edge along the incident direction. In contrast, for the TM polarized light, the T-mode of LSPs was excited at a short wavelength, corresponding to the extinction peak at 340 nm, while the extinction at 340 nm was very weak for the TE polarized light since the resonance wavelength of the L-mode was very far from that of the T-mode. Therefore, the plasmonic nanorod can be worked as a polarizer at the resonance wavelength of the T-mode. Figure 7 illustrates the electric field distributions of the plasmonic nanorod in the x-z planes with different positions away from the source boundary (y = 30 nm) for the T-mode of LSPs, which is excited by the TM polarized wave (along the x-direction). For the near field region in the x-z plane (y = 31 nm) very close to the source edge (y = 30 nm), it was found that the T-mode exhibited a strong resonance along the short axis of the nanorod (along the x-direction), and the electric field was distributed at the rim of the nanorod along the x-direction (Figure 7a). When the distance between the position of the y-normal monitor and the source edge (y = 30 nm) increased gradually from 1, 4, 7, 10, 15, 20, to 30nm (Figure 7a-g), the resonance intensity of the T-mode reduced sharply. Moreover, the electric field became very weak when the distance was larger than 50 nm (y = 80 and 100 nm). In this case, for the TM polarization, the nanorod working at the resonance wavelength of the T-mode exhibited extinction behavior only in the near field region localized in the range within the distance of 30 nm away from the source edge along the incident direction. Additionally, for the incident light polarized along the long axis of the nanorod (z-direction), the electric field was dominantly localized at the two ends of the nanorod, however, the electric fields at the resonance wavelength of the T-mode were quite weak in the near field regions (Figure 8). When the distance between the y-normal monitor and the source edge (y = 30 nm) increased from 1, 4, 7, 10, to 20 nm (Figure 8a-f), the electric fields became weak and their intensities were very weak when the distance was larger than 30 nm. Considering the electric field distributions in the near field region for the TM and TE polarized waves, the plasmonic nanorod working at the wavelength of the T-mode performed the nanopolarization characteristics in the near field region.    Additionally, for the incident light polarized along the long axis of the nanorod (z-direction), the electric field was dominantly localized at the two ends of the nanorod, however, the electric fields at the resonance wavelength of the T-mode were quite weak in the near field regions (Figure 8). When the distance between the y-normal monitor and the source edge (y = 30 nm) increased from 1, 4, 7, 10, to 20 nm (Figure 8a-f), the electric fields became weak and their intensities were very weak when the distance was larger than 30 nm. Considering the electric field distributions in the near field region for the TM and TE polarized waves, the plasmonic nanorod working at the wavelength of the T-mode performed the nanopolarization characteristics in the near field region.
It has been noted that the simulation model described above can be used to investigate the polarization characteristics in the near field region of the nanorod. However, if one considers the application of plasmonic polarizers in the integrated optics, a FDTD simulation model should be developed. As shown in Figure 9, the plasmonic nanorod needs to be supported by a substrate. Furthermore, it was noted that the injection plane of the TFSF source must be parallel to the substrate because the edges of the TFSF source must intersect the same refractive index profile along the injection direction. Therefore, the TFSF source is not available in the system of the nanorod on the substrate where the injection plane of the TFSF source is perpendicular to the substrate. Here, we selected electric dipole sources with different polarization directions (e.g., z and x) to excite the L-mode (Figure 9a) and the T-mode (Figure 9b) in the nanorod on the substrate, respectively. Figure 10 displays the electric field distributions of the plasmonic nanorod on the SiO 2 substrate in the x-z planes with different positions away from the nanorod boundary (y = 15 nm) for the L-mode, which is excited by the dipole source with the polarization direction along the long axis of the nanorod (along the z-direction). The L-mode has a very strong resonant cavity mode at the two ends of the nanorod along the z-direction at the y = 20 nm position (Figure 10a). It was noted that the electric field at the top end of the nanorod was stronger than that at the bottom end, which exhibited an asymmetric distribution due to the influence from the substrate. When the distance between the position of the y-normal monitor and the nanorod edge increased gradually from 5 to 85 nm (Figure 10a-f), the resonance intensity of the cavity mode decreased remarkably. Moreover, for the incident light polarized perpendicular to the long axis of the nanorod on the SiO 2 substrate (along the x-direction), the electric fields at the resonance wavelength of the L-mode were quite weak in the near field regions ( Figure 11), and the electric fields became weak with increasing distance between the y-normal monitor and the nanorod. Therefore, the plasmonic nanorod on the substrate also exhibited nanopolarization behavior in the near field regions. monitor in the positions of y = 31, 34, 37, 40, 45, 50, 60, 80, and 100 nm, respectively.
Additionally, for the incident light polarized along the long axis of the nanorod (z-direction), the electric field was dominantly localized at the two ends of the nanorod, however, the electric fields at the resonance wavelength of the T-mode were quite weak in the near field regions (Figure 8). When the distance between the y-normal monitor and the source edge (y = 30 nm) increased from 1, 4, 7, 10, to 20 nm (Figure 8a-f), the electric fields became weak and their intensities were very weak when the distance was larger than 30 nm. Considering the electric field distributions in the near field region for the TM and TE polarized waves, the plasmonic nanorod working at the wavelength of the T-mode performed the nanopolarization characteristics in the near field region.  It has been noted that the simulation model described above can be used to investigate the polarization characteristics in the near field region of the nanorod. However, if one considers the application of plasmonic polarizers in the integrated optics, a FDTD simulation model should be developed. As shown in Figure 9, the plasmonic nanorod needs to be supported by a substrate. Furthermore, it was noted that the injection plane of the TFSF source must be parallel to the substrate because the edges of the TFSF source must intersect the same refractive index profile along the injection direction. Therefore, the TFSF source is not available in the system of the nanorod on the substrate where the injection plane of the TFSF source is perpendicular to the substrate. Here, we selected electric dipole sources with different polarization directions (e.g., z and x) to excite the L-mode (Figure 9a) and the T-mode (Figure 9b) in the nanorod on the substrate, respectively.
(a) (b) Figure 9. Schematic illustration of the FDTD simulation domain of the plasmonic nanorod on a SiO2 substrate. The incident light waves were two broadband electric dipole sources with the different polarization directions along the z-(a) and x-(b), respectively. The boundary conditions were PML in the x-, y-, and z-directions. Both x and y span ranges were −15 nm to 15 nm and the z-span range of the nanorod was 0 nm to 100 nm, and the z-span range of the substrate was −100 nm to 0 nm. The simulation geometry had a mesh accuracy of 7. The different power monitors with the 2D y-normal type (x-z plane) were selected to analyze the electric field distributions in different near field regions, and the y-normal monitor that collects the electric field in x-z plane were put onto the different positions with different y-values of 20, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 80, and 100 nm. Figure 10 displays the electric field distributions of the plasmonic nanorod on the SiO2 substrate in the x-z planes with different positions away from the nanorod boundary (y = 15 nm) for the L-mode, which is excited by the dipole source with the polarization direction along the long axis of the nanorod (along the z-direction). The L-mode has a very strong resonant cavity mode at the two ends of the nanorod along the z-direction at the y = 20 nm position (Figure 10a). It was noted that the electric field at the top end of the nanorod was stronger than that at the bottom end,

Tuning the Polarization Properties of the Plasmonic Nanopolarizer in Visible to Near Infrared Spectral Range
The calculated extinction spectra of the plasmonic nanorod with different diameters and a constant length of 100 nm are shown in Figure 12a. It was found that the longitudinal resonance peak of LSPs displayed obvious blueshifts from 1033 to 653, 517 and 459 nm with increasing diameter from 10 to 20, 30, and 40 nm. Moreover, for a constant diameter (e.g., 30 nm), the longitudinal resonance peak remarkably redshifted from 428 to 496, 564 and 653 nm with increasing length of 60 to 90, 120, and 150 nm (Figure 12b). Note that when changing one quantity such as diameter (Figure 12a) or length (Figure 12b), the longitudinal resonance peak exhibited obvious shifts, which demonstrates that the resonance wavelength is not only dependent on diameter or length, but it is also closely related to the aspect ratio of the nanorod. For instance, the longitudinal resonance peak presented blueshifts from 1033 to 459 nm with decreasing aspect ratio from 10.0 to 5.0, 3.3 and 2.5 (Figure 12a). Additionally, the longitudinal resonance peak illustrated redshifts from 428 to 653 nm with increasing aspect ratio from 2 to 3, 4 and 5 (Figure 12b). This is because the free electrons in the metal move along the nanorod axis with weaker restoring forces [29], where the nanorod length is larger than the mean free paths of the electrons in the metal. In particular, longitudinal resonance appeared at the near infrared wavelengths by selecting larger aspect ratios (e.g., more than 5). Furthermore, for the constant aspect ratio, both the longitudinal and the transversal resonance peaks did not shift with a change in both the length and the diameter (Figure 13), which indicates that the resonance wavelength only depends on the aspect ratio. Therefore, the wavelength of the plasmonic nanopolarizer can be tuned at the visible to near infrared wavelengths (e.g., from 428 to 1033 nm) by adjusting the aspect ratio (e.g., from 2 to 10).

Tuning the Polarization Properties of the Plasmonic Nanopolarizer in Visible to Near Infrared Spectral Range
The calculated extinction spectra of the plasmonic nanorod with different diameters and a constant length of 100 nm are shown in Figure 12a. It was found that the longitudinal resonance peak of LSPs displayed obvious blueshifts from 1033 to 653, 517 and 459 nm with increasing diameter from 10 to 20, 30, and 40 nm. Moreover, for a constant diameter (e.g., 30 nm), the longitudinal resonance peak remarkably redshifted from 428 to 496, 564 and 653 nm with increasing length of 60 to 90, 120, and 150 nm (Figure 12b). Note that when changing one quantity such as diameter (Figure 12a) or length (Figure 12b), the longitudinal resonance peak exhibited obvious shifts, which demonstrates that the resonance wavelength is not only dependent on diameter or length, but it is also closely related to the aspect ratio of the nanorod. For instance, the longitudinal resonance peak presented blueshifts from 1033 to 459 nm with decreasing aspect ratio from 10.0 to 5.0, 3.3 and 2.5 (Figure 12a). Additionally, the longitudinal resonance peak illustrated redshifts from 428 to 653 nm with increasing aspect ratio from 2 to 3, 4 and 5 (Figure 12b). This is because the free electrons in the metal move along the nanorod axis with weaker restoring forces [29], where the nanorod length is larger than the mean free paths of the electrons in the metal. In particular, longitudinal resonance appeared at the near infrared wavelengths by selecting larger aspect ratios (e.g., more than 5). Furthermore, for the constant aspect ratio, both the longitudinal and the transversal resonance peaks did not shift with a change in both the length and the diameter ( Figure  13), which indicates that the resonance wavelength only depends on the aspect ratio. Therefore, the wavelength of the plasmonic nanopolarizer can be tuned at the visible to near infrared wavelengths (e.g., from 428 to 1033 nm) by adjusting the aspect ratio (e.g., from 2 to 10). On the other hand, the extinction ratios  (Figure 12a), which showed that the insertion loss sharply decreased with a reduction in the diameter at one fixed wavelength. It is indicated that both the extinction ratio and the insertion loss mainly increased with a reduction in wavelength for the constant length. Moreover, the extinction ratios were 103.3, 334.4, 566.0 and 809.3 dB at the wavelengths of 428, 496, 564, and 653 nm with an increase in length from 60 to 90, 120, and 150 nm for the fixed diameter of 30 nm, respectively, while the insertion losses were 0.8, 0.2, 0.1, and 0.06 dB at the corresponding wavelengths (Figure 12b), indicating that the insertion loss also decreased with increasing wavelength. Nevertheless, the nanorod length did not influence the insertion loss at a fixed diameter. Moreover, for a fixed wavelength, corresponding to the constant aspect ratio, both the extinction ratio and the insertion loss enhanced with an increase in the On the other hand, the extinction ratios 10 × log(I 0 /I t,z ) of the nanorod were 214,9, 315.6, 414.5, and 403.4 dB at the wavelengths of 1033, 653, 517, and 459 nm with increasing diameter from 10 to 20, 30, and 40 nm for the constant length of 100 nm, respectively, where the insertion losses 10 × log(I 0 /I t,x ) were 0.002, 0.02, 0.2 and 0.8 dB at the corresponding wavelengths (Figure 12a), which showed that the insertion loss sharply decreased with a reduction in the diameter at one fixed wavelength. It is indicated that both the extinction ratio and the insertion loss mainly increased with a reduction in wavelength for the constant length. Moreover, the extinction ratios were 103.3, 334.4, 566.0 and 809.3 dB at the wavelengths of 428, 496, 564, and 653 nm with an increase in length from 60 to 90, 120, and 150 nm for the fixed diameter of 30 nm, respectively, while the insertion losses were 0.8, 0.2, 0.1, and 0.06 dB at the corresponding wavelengths (Figure 12b), indicating that the insertion loss also decreased with increasing wavelength. Nevertheless, the nanorod length did not influence the insertion loss at a fixed diameter. Moreover, for a fixed wavelength, corresponding to the constant aspect ratio, both the extinction ratio and the insertion loss enhanced with an increase in the diameter and length ( Figure 13).
It is indicated that ultrahigh extinction ratio (e.g., 809.3 dB) and very low insertion loss (e.g., 0.06 dB) can be obtained by increasing the length of the nanorod (e.g., 150 nm, Figure 12b). Crystals 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 15 diameter and length ( Figure 13). It is indicated that ultrahigh extinction ratio (e.g., 809.3 dB) and very low insertion loss (e.g., 0.06 dB) can be obtained by increasing the length of the nanorod (e.g., 150 nm, Figure 12b). Figure 13. The calculated extinction spectra of a single silver nanorod with a constant aspect ratio of 5, the length 2a = 150, 100, and 50 nm, correspondingly, the diameter 2b = 30, 20, and 10 nm.

Conclusions
In summary, we proposed a plasmonic nanopolarizer based on a silver nanorod. The nanopolarizer exhibited highly efficient polarization properties, which stems from the remarkable differences between the resonance modes of LSPs at different wavelengths. The polarization performance can be confirmed by the electric field distribution of the plasmonic nanorod for different polarization directions by FDTD simulation, where the electric field distribution of the polarization properties of the plasmonic nanorod is remarkably dependent on the near field region, demonstrating a nanopolarization effect, in this case, the plasmonic nanopolarizer could efficiently work in the near field range with a distance within 30 nm from the source edge or 60 nm from the nanorod center along the incident direction. The working wavelength of the nanopolarizer can be tuned at the visible to near infrared wavelengths by adjusting the aspect ratio. Very high extinction ratio and extremely low insertion loss can be achieved by increasing the nanorod length. The plasmonic nanopolarizer is a promising candidate for potential applications in integrated all-optical nanophotonic devices and circuits. Figure 13. The calculated extinction spectra of a single silver nanorod with a constant aspect ratio of 5, the length 2a = 150, 100, and 50 nm, correspondingly, the diameter 2b = 30, 20, and 10 nm.

Conclusions
In summary, we proposed a plasmonic nanopolarizer based on a silver nanorod. The nanopolarizer exhibited highly efficient polarization properties, which stems from the remarkable differences between the resonance modes of LSPs at different wavelengths. The polarization performance can be confirmed by the electric field distribution of the plasmonic nanorod for different polarization directions by FDTD simulation, where the electric field distribution of the polarization properties of the plasmonic nanorod is remarkably dependent on the near field region, demonstrating a nanopolarization effect, in this case, the plasmonic nanopolarizer could efficiently work in the near field range with a distance within 30 nm from the source edge or 60 nm from the nanorod center along the incident direction. The working wavelength of the nanopolarizer can be tuned at the visible to near infrared wavelengths by adjusting the aspect ratio. Very high extinction ratio and extremely low insertion loss can be achieved by increasing the nanorod length. The plasmonic nanopolarizer is a promising candidate for potential applications in integrated all-optical nanophotonic devices and circuits.