Enhanced Mechanical Properties of Surface Treated AZ31 Reinforced Polymer Composites

: To enhance the potential application of naturally biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA)-based composites reinforced with magnesium alloy, anodized coatings between Mg and PLA were fabricated on AZ31 magnesium alloy rods. After anodizing (AO) at four di ﬀ erent treatment times, the surface demonstrated a typical porous MgO ceramics morphology, which greatly improved the mechanical properties of composite rods compared to untreated pure Mg. This was attributed to the micro-anchoring e ﬀ ect, which increases interfacial binding forces signiﬁcantly between the Mg rod and PLA. Additionally, the AO layer can also substantially improve the degradability of composite rods in Hank’s solution, due to good corrosion resistance and stronger bonding between PLA and Mg. With a prolonged immersion time of up to 30 days, the porous MgO coating was eventually found to be degraded, evolving to a comparatively smooth surface resulting in a decline in mechanical properties due to a decrease in interfacial bonding strength. According to the current ﬁndings, the PLA-clad surface treated Mg composite rod may hold promise for use as a bioresorbable implant material for orthopedic inner ﬁxation.


Introduction
A large number of patients suffer from bone injuries from different accidental causes leading to hospitalization. To cater to this situation, orthopedic implants play a vital role in enhancing the lives of the affected people. Biodegradable bio-ceramics and biopolymers have been vastly utilized in the field of orthopedics due to their advantage of spontaneous degradation in the in vivo environment, hence eliminating the adversity of removing implants by surgical procedures or leaving them as such in the body [1].
Polylactic acid (PLA) and associated glycolic with bi-polymer and interrelated hydroxyl-acids are the main materials for orthopedic purposes due to inherited mechanical strength and degradability [2][3][4]. Biopolymers are primarily applied as the protective coating for Mg alloy [5]. In addition to this,

Mechanical Properties
The mechanical property of composite rods was analyzed using a universal testing machine (CMT4503). Considering the various factors-e.g., the brittle nature of PLA, small radius of Mg rod

Composites Coating
The PLA-clad Mg rods were produce from untreated and AO treated Mg rods by injection molding methods. In this investigation, commercial scale PLA (3251D, 60,000 g/mol average molecular Crystals 2020, 10, 381 4 of 18 weight and has 1.24 g/cm 3 density), acquired from Nature Works (Shenzhem ESUN Ind. Co. Ltd., Shenzhem, China). Pure and control PLA samples were also obtained by similar method. Figure 1b shows the optical photographic images of five varients of pure PLA and PLA-clad composites rods. Table 1 shows the parameters used for the injection molding process.

Mechanical Properties
The mechanical property of composite rods was analyzed using a universal testing machine (CMT4503). Considering the various factors-e.g., the brittle nature of PLA, small radius of Mg rod and thick ≥0.5-mm coating layer-tensile and bending tests were performed only up to the fracture of the PLA layer, and not extended/continued until the fracture of the Mg rod. The tensile (ASTM D638-2014) and bending tests (ASTM D2990-2001) of Mg rods were carried out by the specified procedures [27][28][29][30]. The details refer to analyzing the failure of only the PLA coatings with a constant speed of 1 mm/min.

In Vitro Degradation Test
For in vitro tests for the degradation of uncoated and coated rods, the samples were placed in a polyethylene bottle (vs-a-vis, a vertical column) containing 15 mL of Hank's solution. Immersion tests were performed in Hank's solution with a pH value 7.4; the temperature was kept at 37 • C in the thermostat oscillator. Hank's solution universal ingredients; "(8 g/L NaCl, 0.4 g/L KCL, 0.14 g/L CaCl 2 , 0.09 g/L Na 2 HPO 4 ·7H 2 O, 0.2 g/L MgSO 4 ·7H 2 O, 0.35 g/L NaHCO 3 , 0.06 g/L KH 2 PO 4 and 1 g/L C 6 H 12 O 6 )". The specimen area to solution volume ratio was maintained to 3 cm 2 /mL, in accordance with ISO 10993-12 [31][32][33]. The Hank's solution was changed every 24 h for 30 days [27][28][29]. At different immersion times (3, 7, 14 and 30 days), samples were taken out of the Hank's solution, rinsed gently with distilled water and air dried. Hydrogen evolution tests [33] were completed for the four types of samples, i.e., AO treated Mg (Mg-AO) rod, PLA cladding AO (Mg-AO-PLA) rod, uncoated Mg (Mg) rod and PLA-clad Mg (Mg-PLA), and each rod was suspended in Hank's solution.

Microstructures
The effect of AO on the surface morphology is illustrated by the scanning electron microscope (SEM) as shown in Figure 2a-d, where AO treatments were performed at different times, 4, 8, 12 and 15 min. All the AO surface morphologies had different porous structures. In Figure 2, irregular big pores (range 10-50 µm) and small pores (few microns), were seen on the coated surface for all the four times tested, presenting different porosities each time. During the AO process, the pores behaved like a micro-arc, discharging networks through which the oxide escaped the surface with rigorous oxygen evolution, fairly contributing to the development of the porous morphology of the ceramic surface coatings. The number of pores over the surfaces of the coated specimen at 4 min, 8 min and 12 min were similar as shown in Figure 2a-c, while with the increase in processing time, the size of pores appeared to be larger with roughness of coating surface in Figure 2d. The samples coated at the 12 min exhibited a more uniform in both size and distribution than other samples. These pores formed due to preferential growth of the film at micro structurally localized areas on the anodic surface related to the characteristic electrochemical heterogeneity of the surface. Furthermore, dielectric breakdown of the existing coating, randomly localized high current during sparking, release of oxygen and the trapping of accompanying water vapor may also have caused the pores and flaws in anodizing coatings [28,30]. size of pores appeared to be larger with roughness of coating surface in Figure 2d. The samples coated at the 12 min exhibited a more uniform in both size and distribution than other samples. These pores formed due to preferential growth of the film at micro structurally localized areas on the anodic surface related to the characteristic electrochemical heterogeneity of the surface. Furthermore, dielectric breakdown of the existing coating, randomly localized high current during sparking, release of oxygen and the trapping of accompanying water vapor may also have caused the pores and flaws in anodizing coatings [28,30]. In Figure 3a-f, the cross-sectional composites rod of the uncoated and AO coated produced at various time intervals were quite noticeable and showed a continuous and uneven feature. However, the untreated magnesium alloy was rougher due to the higher surface void ratio than the treated surface owing to their weak bonding capacity at the interface rendered by the physical interaction with interfacial frictional force [33][34][35][36][37]. Furthermore, the small contact regions and interfacial frictional force for Mg rods with anodizing treatment indicated the thickness of 3.5 µm at 4 min, 5 µm at 8 min and 8 µm at 12 min, as shown in Figure 3a-c. Generally, the porosity and the thickness of the coating had a significant influence on the corrosion behavior of the substrate. The sample coated at 8 min showed uneven surface having a pore size of 2 µm as indicated by the white arrow in Figure 3b. Thus, this AO coating could not effectively protect the substrate from corrosion in an aggressive environment without further treatment [37].
The coated surface demonstrated improved binding between the interfaces among PLA/coating/Mg due to the interfacial micro-anchorage and the interlocking between the PLA-clad composite rods [34]. This phenomenon suggested that surface coated at 12 min and 15 min showed relatively strong chemical bonding between PLA and MgO coating (Figure 3c,d). Owing to the presence of intermittent MgO coating, certain microscopic cracks were observed in Figure 3c,d. Therefore, a thickness of 10 µm of MgO coating was achieved as a result of AO treatment for 15 min. Comparing the PLA-clad by 12 min AO treatment provided improved interfacial bonding due to the distinct micro-anchoring interfacial encounter (an interlocking effect) of porous MgO and PLA layers, presented in Figure 3c. During injection molding, PLA melt entered these opening in MgO coatings and a micro-anchoring effect was established resulting in enhanced mechanical bonding [34][35][36]. The coated surface demonstrated improved binding between the interfaces among PLA/coating/Mg due to the interfacial micro-anchorage and the interlocking between the PLA-clad composite rods [34]. This phenomenon suggested that surface coated at 12 min and 15 min showed relatively strong chemical bonding between PLA and MgO coating (Figure 3c  In PLA-clad composite rods, the tensile and bending strengths were mainly abided by the reinforced magnesium alloy. The role of the matrix polylactic acid was to bond the reinforcing material. Furthermore, the performance of fully developed reinforced materials to balance the transfer stresses, leading to a composite effect. The performance of the composite rod was much better than the single material. Interfacial adhesion is one of the most common and important phenomena in polymer materials. Based on full infiltration, there is a need for further adhesion between the reinforcement and the matrix material to form a better bond between the interface layers. To enhance the role of reinforced materials, a good interface bond between reinforcement and polymer matrix plays an important role to bear external stress. Different anodizing times, micro pores and cracks were still observed in the AO coating. These features did not cross through the entire layer. The pores in the MgO coating layer Crystals 2020, 10, 381 7 of 18 appeared because of gas escaping the micro-arc discharge channels, while the cracks are formed by the heat stress due to fast solidification of the melted oxide in a comparatively cold electrolyte [38]. The smallest thickness in Figure 3a was basically at the lowest time interval, leading to the undefined edge between the substrate and the AO coating. It could be observed that the coating thickness increased with time. Surface treatment of the magnesium alloy rods has been quite systematically explored by many researchers. Cai et al. reports the surface treatment morphology, grain size and roughness by atomic force microscopy analysis [29] and another study reports the variation elemental ionic configuration by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of magnesium alloy surface treatment [30]. Though there are slight but distinct differences in these studies, an obvious comparison may be established. Figure 4 shows the results of XRD patterns of the MgO coated and non-coated Mg rods. The observed peaks in the XRD of coated rods were known as MgO, signifying the formation of MgO ceramic porous coating due to AO treatment.
reinforced magnesium alloy. The role of the matrix polylactic acid was to bond the reinforcing material. Furthermore, the performance of fully developed reinforced materials to balance the transfer stresses, leading to a composite effect. The performance of the composite rod was much better than the single material. Interfacial adhesion is one of the most common and important phenomena in polymer materials. Based on full infiltration, there is a need for further adhesion between the reinforcement and the matrix material to form a better bond between the interface layers. To enhance the role of reinforced materials, a good interface bond between reinforcement and polymer matrix plays an important role to bear external stress. Different anodizing times, micro pores and cracks were still observed in the AO coating. These features did not cross through the entire layer. The pores in the MgO coating layer appeared because of gas escaping the micro-arc discharge channels, while the cracks are formed by the heat stress due to fast solidification of the melted oxide in a comparatively cold electrolyte [38]. The smallest thickness in Figure 3a was basically at the lowest time interval, leading to the undefined edge between the substrate and the AO coating. It could be observed that the coating thickness increased with time. Surface treatment of the magnesium alloy rods has been quite systematically explored by many researchers. Cai et al. reports the surface treatment morphology, grain size and roughness by atomic force microscopy analysis [29] and another study reports the variation elemental ionic configuration by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of magnesium alloy surface treatment [30]. Though there are slight but distinct differences in these studies, an obvious comparison may be established. Figure  4 shows the results of XRD patterns of the MgO coated and non-coated Mg rods. The observed peaks in the XRD of coated rods were known as MgO, signifying the formation of MgO ceramic porous coating due to AO treatment.

Mechanical Properties
Bending tests and tensile tests were conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties and the joinability of PLA surface layer and MgO (inner layer) of the PLA-clad Mg rods. The tensile strength of composite rods is shown in Figure 5a, where the pure PLA is included as a comparison. In tensile

Mechanical Properties
Bending tests and tensile tests were conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties and the joinability of PLA surface layer and MgO (inner layer) of the PLA-clad Mg rods. The tensile strength of composite rods is shown in Figure 5a, where the pure PLA is included as a comparison. In tensile analysis, pure PLA rod showed the strength of~60 MPa. Whereas, composite rods revealed the fracture of PLA surface coating before Mg rod inner structure, hence, ultimately progressing towards the material's failure, as shown in Figure 6a. Consequently, the ultimate tensile strengths of the Mg-PLA rods and Mg-AO-PLA rods at 4, 8, 12 and 15 min were about 69, 99, 120, 131 and 128 MPa, respectively. Hence, it can be concluded that Mg rods inserted PLA had a higher ultimate tensile strength than that of pure PLA. Furthermore, the increase in the tensile strengths of AO treated magnesium alloy rod compared to untreated Mg rods suggests that MgO film had a significant influence in refining the mechanical properties. The bending strength values of the PLA-clad Mg rods are presented in Figure 5b. During three points bending measurement, a simple PLA rod was tested to ultimate failure demonstrating the strength of~118 MPa. In contrast, only the PLA outer surface was fractured for the composite rods, as shown in Figure 6b. Further, bending strength of composite samples; Mg-PLA rod and Mg-AO-PLA rods at 4, 8, 12 and 15 min was also analyzed. The resultant curves relating to strength-failure was approx. 198, 202, 205, 215 and 220 MPa respectively. treated magnesium alloy rod compared to untreated Mg rods suggests that MgO film had a significant influence in refining the mechanical properties. The bending strength values of the PLA-clad Mg rods are presented in Figure 5b. During three points bending measurement, a simple PLA rod was tested to ultimate failure demonstrating the strength of ~118 MPa. In contrast, only the PLA outer surface was fractured for the composite rods, as shown in Figure 6b. Further, bending strength of composite samples; Mg-PLA rod and Mg-AO-PLA rods at 4, 8, 12 and 15 min was also analyzed. The resultant curves relating to strength-failure was approx. 198, 202, 205, 215 and 220 MPa respectively.     Figure 7 shows the mass variation of the four composites and the pure PLA after 3, 7 and 14 days immersed in Hank's solution. For pure polylactic acid (PLA), the weight loss was not sufficiently decreased, (0.14%) while soaking for 14 days. The degradation and corrosion behavior of the composite materials prepared with treated and untreated magnesium alloy were also observed. The treated magnesium alloy rod was coated with AO at various oxidation time periods 4, 8, 12 and 15 min. During the process of degradation of the coated sample, Mg(OH) 2 was hydrolyzed by Mg matrix and MgO, which sufficiently increased the weight. Moreover, the outer protective effect of polylactic acid, the corrosion product is difficult to enter the solution with the increases of immersion time. Therefore, a corrosion product was accumulated and the sample weight increased. Due to the small change of the weight of polylactic acid, the weight of the composite increased with the increasing effect of polylactic acid and magnesium alloy. For the untreated magnesium alloy, the composite material had no protective effect on the film, the corrosion was relatively severe, the corrosion product was accumulated and the weight increased. The weight gain rate was 0.28% after soaking for 14 days. The magnesium alloy with surface treatment results in high corrosion resistance due to the effect of the oxide layer. The weight gain of Mg-AO-PLA rods treated at 4, 8, 12 and 15 min was 0.22%, 0.20%, 0.14% and 0.15%, respectively, after 14-days immersion. The results indicate that the composites improved corrosion resistance properties with anodizing coating.   For Mg-AO rods, the hydrogen evolution levels were intermediate between Mg-PLA composite rods and Mg rods. It also showed a change in extending the immersion time. Moreover, the curves showed a decline in the hydrogen evolution rate with respect to the immersion time for Mg-AO rods and Mg rods. This trend can be caused by the production of uniform corrosion species leading to a reduction in the Mg corrosion rate. During the initial 7 days of immersion of Mg-PLA, there was a gradual increment in the hydrogen evolution volume. However, with an increase in the soaking time, the hydrogen evolution rate was also enhanced. This shows that the single layer of PLA provides limited protection. As the distance between Mg and PLA gradually increased, the corrosive intermediate species began to interact with the substrate, leading to the degradation of substrate by corrosion. The curves for hydrogen evolution rate for the Mg-AO-PLA were quite flat, and their hydrogen evolution volume was recorded to be 0.5 mL/cm 2 after two weeks of immersion. It could be inferred that the composite material coatings may increase the life span of Mg alloy through corrosion protection. When the rods were exposed to dichloromethane solution, the PLA claddings separated from the inner surface. A optical macroscopic view of the morphologies of Mg rod surface after PLA elimination is presented in Figure 9e-h. The images depict that uncoated AO-Mg rod samples exhibited extreme corrosion in comparison to the AO coated rods. As the immersion time continued, a non-coated sample allowed the water molecules to penetrate into the PLA matrix, and this caused a degradation of the material. Figure 10 shows the SEM of the sample with magnified surface morphologies of PLA and corrosion species after removing PLA layer by Dichloromethane dissolution. The column from top to bottom shows Mg-AO-PLA at different AO treatment time periods, along with Mg-PLA composite rods after removal of PLA coating. The images in the row moving from left towards right show the immersion time for 3, 7, 14 and 30 days. Furthermore, after 3 days of immersion time of the Mg-PLA rod, the PLA-removed Mg rod surface showed more rough and fractured structures (Figure 10q). Longer immersion time led to the formation of a uniform corrosion layer. Although the surface was smooth again, shrinkage cracks could still be observed on the surface of the dried sample (Figure 10r-t). Meanwhile, for the PLA removed AO coated Mg rods (Figure 10a-p  When the rods were exposed to dichloromethane solution, the PLA claddings separated from the inner surface. A optical macroscopic view of the morphologies of Mg rod surface after PLA elimination is presented in Figure 9e-h. The images depict that uncoated AO-Mg rod samples exhibited extreme corrosion in comparison to the AO coated rods. As the immersion time continued, a non-coated sample allowed the water molecules to penetrate into the PLA matrix, and this caused a degradation of the material. Figure 10 shows the SEM of the sample with magnified surface morphologies of PLA and corrosion species after removing PLA layer by Dichloromethane dissolution. The column from top to bottom shows Mg-AO-PLA at different AO treatment time periods, along with Mg-PLA composite rods after removal of PLA coating. The images in the row moving from left towards right show the immersion time for 3, 7, 14 and 30 days. Furthermore, after 3 days of immersion time of the Mg-PLA rod, the PLA-removed Mg rod surface showed more rough and fractured structures (Figure 10q). Longer immersion time led to the formation of a uniform corrosion layer. Although the surface was smooth again, shrinkage cracks could still be observed on the surface of the dried sample (Figure 10r-t). Meanwhile, for the PLA removed AO coated Mg rods (Figure 10a-p), prolonged immersion led to the replacement of actual pores with the comparatively smoother surface with a few minute cracks.   After the degradation of the aforementioned six sample types in Hank's solution, their mechanical stability was assessed by computing their tensile and bending strength after 3, 7, 14 and 30 days of immersion. Figure 11 shows the results of tensile test on 7-day-immersed Mg rods treated with AO at 4 min. Prolonging the immersion time influenced the interfacial micro-anchoring mechanism between the MgO layer and PLA, causing its weakening and complete disappearance as shown in Figure 10a     The increase in the strength of retention can be due to the AO, which maintains the binding and integrity of the reinforced PLA in immersion conditions. AO-coated portions with no apparent corrosion patterns on the Mg rod following immersion are shown in Figure 10j-p. Therefore, pure Mg-AO-PLA rods treated at 15 min showed a delayed decrease in bending strength, from~221 MPa to~175 MPa after 30 days of immersion. It can be interpreted from the results that the interfacial properties played an effective role in modulating the mechanical behavior of the PLA-Mg rod due to immersion degradation. The micro-anchorage between PLA and AO induced porous MgO layer will considerably improve their binding strength, and thus holds a prospect for fixation of bone fractures and various biomedical applications. However, the results indicated the weakening of the micro-anchoring interaction of the corrosion and smoothening of the porous surface due to depletion in corrosive medium, causing a drop in the mechanical properties. Therefore, it is desirable and recommended to improve the PLA-Mg composite rod design with stable porous surface and improved corrosion resistance with better outer protecting surface of PLA. The increase in the strength of retention can be due to the AO, which maintains the binding and integrity of the reinforced PLA in immersion conditions. AO-coated portions with no apparent corrosion patterns on the Mg rod following immersion are shown in Figure 10j-p. Therefore, pure Mg-AO-PLA rods treated at 15 min showed a delayed decrease in bending strength, from ~221 MPato ~175 MPa after 30 days of immersion. It can be interpreted from the results that the interfacial properties played an effective role in modulating the mechanical behavior of the PLA-Mg rod due to immersion degradation. The micro-anchorage between PLA and AO induced porous MgO layer will considerably improve their binding strength, and thus holds a prospect for fixation of bone fractures and various biomedical applications. However, the results indicated the weakening of the micro-anchoring interaction of the corrosion and smoothening of the porous surface due to depletion in corrosive medium, causing a drop in the mechanical properties. Therefore, it is desirable and recommended to improve the PLA-Mg composite rod design with stable porous surface and improved corrosion resistance with better outer protecting surface of PLA.

The Degradation Mechanism
For PLA-clad composite rod, the outermost polylactic acid matrix may protect the magnesium alloy reinforcements during soaking. When the water molecules and erosive ions in the solution reach the surface of the composites rod, the outer polylactic acid plays an effective barrier to the shielding effect. Polylactic acid mainly degrades in four stages: water absorption, ester breakage, soluble oligomer diffusion and dissolution. When the water molecules and corrosive ions in the solution enter through the polylactic acid to the internal magnesium alloy, corrosion of magnesium alloys will occur. The schematic diagram of the degradation process of PLA/Mg is shown in Figure  13a-b. At the initial stage of soaking, the etching solution was blocked on the PLA surface ( Figure  13a) due to the protective effect of the outermost PLA. As the soaking time increased, the etching

The Degradation Mechanism
For PLA-clad composite rod, the outermost polylactic acid matrix may protect the magnesium alloy reinforcements during soaking. When the water molecules and erosive ions in the solution reach the surface of the composites rod, the outer polylactic acid plays an effective barrier to the shielding effect. Polylactic acid mainly degrades in four stages: water absorption, ester breakage, soluble oligomer diffusion and dissolution. When the water molecules and corrosive ions in the solution enter through the polylactic acid to the internal magnesium alloy, corrosion of magnesium alloys will occur. The schematic diagram of the degradation process of PLA/Mg is shown in Figure 13a,b. At the initial stage of soaking, the etching solution was blocked on the PLA surface (Figure 13a) due to the protective effect of the outermost PLA. As the soaking time increased, the etching solution passes through the polylactic acid and reaches the interface between the magnesium alloy and the polylactic acid ( Figure 13b); as the surface is untreated, the corrosion starts when the etching solution reaches through the polylactic acid and is uniformly corroded at these locations. The degradation products on the surface of Mg rod in the composite are Mg, O, P, C and Ca. The treated surface with the anodizing has a porous structure. The porous structure is indicated with yellow sphere color is shown in Figure 13c,d. With the prolongation of soaking time, the polylactic acid at the pores is degraded and of Mg(OH) 2 accumulate at the pores. The corrosion range is expanded horizontally (Figure 13d). At this time, due to the corrosion of the products and destruction of the polylactic acid in the pores, the mechanical locking between the layer and the polylactic acid is weakened, results in the decrease of the interfacial bonding strength and mechanical properties of the composite material. In the whole process of failure, the interfacial adhesion plays a leading role and therefore, no serious corrosion of magnesium alloy. As per the results, the interfacial characteristics have a significant effect on the mechanical properties of PLA-Mg rods prior to and after the immersion induced decomposition. The micro-anchorage between PLA and AO induced porous MgO layer will considerably improve their binding strength, and thus holds a future prospect for the fixation of bone fractures and various biomedical applications. However, the results indicate the weakening of the micro-anchoring interaction because of the corrosion and smoothening of the porous surface due to depletion in the As per the results, the interfacial characteristics have a significant effect on the mechanical properties of PLA-Mg rods prior to and after the immersion induced decomposition. The micro-anchorage between PLA and AO induced porous MgO layer will considerably improve their binding strength, and thus holds a future prospect for the fixation of bone fractures and various biomedical applications. However, the results indicate the weakening of the micro-anchoring interaction because of the corrosion and smoothening of the porous surface due to depletion in the corrosive medium due to a drop in mechanical properties. Therefore, it is desirable and recommended to improve the PLA-Mg composite rod design with stable porous surface and improved corrosion resistance with better outer protecting surface of PLA.

Conclusions
The focus of this study was the preparation of PLA-Mg biodegradable composite rods by plastic injection molding (PIM) techniques for prospective utilization in bone fracture fixation. The following conclusions were drawn from the experimental results: (1) Mg AZ31 rod surface was treated by anodizing at different time periods of 4, 8, 12 and 15 min. The most compact film was developed on the surface of the magnesium alloy by 12 min of anodization with a coating thickness of 8 µm.
(2) AO coatings substantially enhanced the interfacial linkage between outer PLA coat and the inner Mg rod as an outcome of micro-anchorage. Consequently, this sample with intermediate coating exhibited greater tensile and bending strength values, along with improved resistance to corrosion in Hank's solution than the PLA-Mg rod without AO treatment.
(3) Mg surfaces treated at 12 min displayed overall better corrosion resistance and mechanical properties in Hank's solution than other treated surfaces.
(4) A rapid decline in tensile and bending strength was observed for the PLA-Mg rods due to the corrosion and smoothening of the intermediate coating after prolonger immersion in Hank's solution.