Photocatalytic Activity of Nanostructured Titania Films Obtained by Electrochemical , Chemical , and Thermal Oxidation of Ti 6 Al 4 V Alloy — Comparative Analysis

Three different Ti6Al4V surface oxidation methods have been applied to obtain three types of titania materials of different nanoarchitecture. Electrochemical oxidation of titanium alloy allowed for obtaining titania nanotubes (TNT), chemical oxidation led to obtain titania nanofibers (TNF), and thermal oxidation gave titania nanowires (TNW). My earlier investigations of these nanomaterials were focused mainly on the estimation of their bioactivity and potential application in modern implantology. In this article, the comparative analysis of the photocatalytic activity of produced systems, as well as the impact of their structure and morphology on this activity, are discussed. The activity of studied nanomaterials was estimated basis of UV-induced degradation of methylene blue and also acetone, and it was determined quantitatively according to the Langmuir–Hinshelwood reaction mechanism. The obtained results were compared to the activity of Pilkington Glass ActivTM (reference sample). Among analyzed systems, titania nanofibers obtained at 140 and 120 ◦C, possessing anatase and anatase/amorphous structure, as well as titania nanowires obtained at 475 and 500 ◦C, possessing anatase and anatase/rutile structure, were better photocatalyst than the reference sample. Completely amorphous titania nanotubes, turned out to be an interesting alternative for photocatalytic materials in the form of thin films, however, their photocatalytic activity is lower than for Pilkington Glass ActivTM.


Introduction
The use of modern materials in different technologies requires detailed knowledge on the impact of the structure, morphology, and the physicochemical properties of produced systems on their adequate activity: photocatalytic, optical or biological one.This is particularly important when such innovative materials are commercialized and marketed.The studies on titanium dioxide and the materials produced on its basis are a good example of the efforts to determine the impact of individual structural and morphological parameters on properties and application possibilities of modern materials.TiO 2 materials and nanomaterials, now are often used in various applications, such as self-cleaning surfaces [1][2][3], anti-fogging mirrors [4,5], antimicrobial coatings, [6][7][8][9] electrochromic devices [10][11][12], rechargeable batteries [13,14], and sensors [15,16].They can also be applied in medicine [17][18][19][20], automotive [21,22], and in photocatalytic environmental cleaning of water and air [23][24][25][26].For these applications, the crystalline form of TiO 2 (anatase and rutile) are mostly used and additional density functional theory (DFT) calculations, which are intended to define the electronic structure, energy band gap, and defects level, are applied [27].But it should be pointed out that recently more and more studies have started to question the belief that amorphous titania is not photoactive.Even, if it is characterized by a large number of defects leading to rapid recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes, before applying them in reactions [28].Photocatalytic activity of amorphous titania has been noticed in the decomposition of stearic acid [29] and methylene blue [30], as well as in the photogeneration of hydrogen from water [31] and the photo-oxidation of dibenzothiophene [32].The increase of surface active sites density (Ti-peroxide for the oxidation [33] and Ti 3+ for the reduction [34]), as well, as charge trapping by dopants [35], are used to explain the observed photocatalytic activity of amorphous TiO 2 .However, it does not change the fact that the same amorphous titania is inactive in the photoreduction of alcohols [36] as well as in the photooxidation of acetic acid and acetaldehyde [37].But the structure of titanium dioxide is one thing, and the surface morphology is another that affects photocatalytic activity.It is because of the fact, that surface wettability and surface energy, which influence mentioned activity, are closely related to surface morphology.Among different titania architectures nanoparticles [38,39], nanotubes [40,41], nanofibers [42], nanowires [43], nanorods [43,44], nanobelts [43,45], nanoribbons [46], are the most important and often studied.The diversity of TiO 2 nanoarchitecture results from a wide range of applied experimental methods for the synthesis of nanomaterials.These include the hydrothermal method [47], solvothermal method [48], sol-gel [49], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [50], and direct oxidation methods: electrochemical [51], chemical [52] and thermal one [53].To make matters even more complicated, each of the mentioned methods may lead to various architectures depending on the conditions of the synthesis process.It is not possible to characterize and compare all the systems with each other.But I have decided to choose several of them and carry out analyzes to assess their photocatalytic activity.
In this article I would like to undertake an important issue, which has not been thoroughly analyzed in detail, so far, i.e., the comparison of photocatalytic activity of thin titanium dioxide layers of a diverse nanoarchitecture, which are completely or partially amorphous, or which are crystalline.Samples of the similar thickness, consisting of nanotubes (TNT), nanofibers (TNF), and nanowires (TNW), have been produced by electrochemical, chemical, and thermal oxidation of the surface of titanium alloy substrates, respectively.The photocatalytic activity of above-mentioned materials has been estimated on the basis of the UV induced decomposition of the water-soluble impurities pattern (methylene blue) and volatile impurities pattern (acetone).Obtained results were compared with the same ones obtained for the Pilkington Glass Activ TM , which is the world's first commercially available, self-cleaning glass, comprising a film of nanocrystalline titanium dioxide (about 15 nm) as the photocatalytic active layer [54].This layer is deposited on float glass, using the atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition (APCVD) process, and TiCl 4 and ethyl acetate as titania precursors [55].Pilkington Glass Activ TM can be used as a benchmark for all other photocatalyst films, which are produced for light-driven air and water purification.
The results presented in this paper can be used to design of low-budget and low-energy-consuming water and air purification systems.The production of the amorphous systems is beneficial from an economic point of view in the construction of the above-mentioned devices.Furthermore, the studied materials were checked in terms of their potential applications as systems capable of UV-induced sterilization.This property of produced titania materials is especially desirable in their potential application in the design and in the production of medical devices, e.g., implants.

Morphological and Structural Characterization of Titania Nanomaterials
The electrochemical oxidation of titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), carried out with the use of defined potentials allowed for the formation of TiO 2 nanotubular architecture (TNT) on the surface of this substrate.Figure 1 shows the impact of the applied voltage on the diameter of nanotubes and for their arrangement on the surface.The use of the low potentials (U = 5, 10 V) led to the formation of nanoporous coatings, while at higher ones (U = 15, 20, 30, 40 V) the produced coatings consisted of separated titania nanotubes of well-formed walls.The thicknesses of the produced coatings were 120 to 150 nm.In general, the diameter of the produced nanotubes increases with the increasing potential.However, analysis of scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of samples anodized at higher potentials, i.e., 40-60 V, indicate on the formation of morphologically heterogeneous TNT coatings.In some cases, the tubes of small diameters are visible in the interior of larger ones (Figure 1f).It suggests that the growth conditions at such high potentials on the surface of the titanium alloy in the presence of an aqueous HF solution, as an electrolyte (1st generation nanotubes synthesis), are not optimal.While 15 to 30 V are optimal values of the potential used in the formation of well-ordered nanotubes in these conditions.Regardless the potential applied in the anodization of Ti6Al4V substrates, the obtained nanotubular coating on the alloy surface was amorphous TiO 2 , which was proved by analysis of Raman and infrared diffuse reflectance Fourier transform spectroscopy (IR DRIFT) spectral data (Figure 2).On the registered spectra there is a lack of signals, which can be attributed to crystalline forms of titania, such as anatase or rutile [56,57].
Catalysts 2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 22 nanoporous coatings, while at higher ones (U = 15, 20, 30, 40 V) the produced coatings consisted of separated titania nanotubes of well-formed walls.The thicknesses of the produced coatings were 120 to 150 nm.In general, the diameter of the produced nanotubes increases with the increasing potential.However, analysis of scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of samples anodized at higher potentials, i.e., 40-60V, indicate on the formation of morphologically heterogeneous TNT coatings.In some cases, the tubes of small diameters are visible in the interior of larger ones (Figure 1f).It suggests that the growth conditions at such high potentials on the surface of the titanium alloy in the presence of an aqueous HF solution, as an electrolyte (1st generation nanotubes synthesis), are not optimal.While 15 to 30V are optimal values of the potential used in the formation of well-ordered nanotubes in these conditions.Regardless the potential applied in the anodization of Ti6Al4V substrates, the obtained nanotubular coating on the alloy surface was amorphous TiO2, which was proved by analysis of Raman and infrared diffuse reflectance Fourier transform spectroscopy (IR DRIFT) spectral data (Figure 2).On the registered spectra there is a lack of signals, which can be attributed to crystalline forms of titania, such as anatase or rutile [56,57].
In the case of treating the titanium alloy surface with 30% hydrogen peroxide solution at elevated temperature, a layer resembling very fine nanofibers was obtained-TNF.The parameter, which was changed during the research, was the temperature.SEM images presented in Figure 3 seem to confirm that applying the chemical oxidation at the temperature range of 80 to 120°C lead to morphologically similar arrangements, but obtained fibers differ in thickness.The sample obtained at 140 °C differs from the others, as it forms more compact systems, consisting of sticking together clusters of nanofibers, intersected by grooves having a width of about 100 nm.In the case of treating the titanium alloy surface with 30% hydrogen peroxide solution at elevated temperature, a layer resembling very fine nanofibers was obtained-TNF.The parameter, which was changed during the research, was the temperature.SEM images presented in Figure 3 seem to confirm that applying the chemical oxidation at the temperature range of 80 to 120 • C lead to morphologically similar arrangements, but obtained fibers differ in thickness.The sample obtained at 140       Figure 4, shows the Raman spectra of TNF samples produced at 80, 100, 120, and 140 • C. According to these data the TNF80 and TNF100 samples were amorphous, whereas the presence of TiO 2 anatase crystallites in the layer structure of TNF120 and TNF140 has been confirmed.[56,57].
Catalysts 2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 22 Figure 4, shows the Raman spectra of TNF samples produced at 80, 100, 120, and 140 °C.According to these data the TNF80 and TNF100 samples were amorphous, whereas the presence of TiO2 anatase crystallites in the layer structure of TNF120 and TNF140 has been confirmed.[56,57].Thermal oxidation of titanium alloy carried out in the presence of argon containing trace amounts of oxygen led to obtain nanowires and nanorods, which for the purposes of this publication, were jointly named as TNW (Numbers at TNW are the temperature [°C], in which the system was created).Large morphological diversity of the obtained systems (Figure 5) is associated with the use of different temperatures in oxidation processes, as the temperature was the only variable process parameter.From the structural point of view, this kind of nanoarchitecture differs from the rest of the studied systems, which was confirmed by analysis of Raman spectra.The bands, which were found at c.a. 399, 516, and 640 cm −1 , in Raman spectra of samples produced at a lower temperature (475 °C), indicate on the formation of TiO2 anatase form (Figure 6a) [56,57].The appearance of the additional bands at c.a. 440 and 611 cm −1 in spectra of layers produced at 500 and 550 °C confirms the presence of both TiO2 crystalline forms; anatase and rutile [56,57], which was additionally proved by grazing-angle X-ray diffraction (GAXRD) studies (Figure 6b [58]).Structural studies on titania nanowires obtained at 600 °C showed the presence of rutile form.Structural homogeneity of the TNW600 sample surface was confirmed by Raman microscopy mapping (Figure S1).According to this data TiO2 rutile was the only polymorhic form appearing on the whole surface of the studied sample.Thermal oxidation of titanium alloy carried out in the presence of argon containing trace amounts of oxygen led to obtain nanowires and nanorods, which for the purposes of this publication, were jointly named as TNW (Numbers at TNW are the temperature [ • C], in which the system was created).Large morphological diversity of the obtained systems (Figure 5) is associated with the use of different temperatures in oxidation processes, as the temperature was the only variable process parameter.From the structural point of view, this kind of nanoarchitecture differs from the rest of the studied systems, which was confirmed by analysis of Raman spectra.The bands, which were found at c.a. 399, 516, and 640 cm −1 , in Raman spectra of samples produced at a lower temperature (475 • C), indicate on the formation of TiO 2 anatase form (Figure 6a) [56,57].The appearance of the additional bands at c.a. 440 and 611 cm −1 in spectra of layers produced at 500 and 550 • C confirms the presence of both TiO 2 crystalline forms; anatase and rutile [56,57], which was additionally proved by grazing-angle X-ray diffraction (GAXRD) studies (Figure 6b [58]).Structural studies on titania nanowires obtained at 600 • C showed the presence of rutile form.Structural homogeneity of the TNW600 sample surface was confirmed by Raman microscopy mapping (Figure S1).According to this data TiO 2 rutile was the only polymorhic form appearing on the whole surface of the studied sample.

Wettability and Surface Energy of Titania Nanoarchitectures
The wettability of all studied samples was estimated based on the contact angle measurements of water droplets deposited on the sample surface (Table 1).For the samples Ti6Al4V/TNT5-Ti6Al4V/TNT40 the hydrophilicity of the coatings increases with the increase of the nanotube diameter.While the use of higher potentials (50, 60V), led to the increase of hydrophobicity of produced Ti6Al4V/TNT50 and Ti6Al4V/TNT60 systems.In comparison to the reference sample (pure titanium alloy), the amorphous titania nanofiber coatings revealed clear hydrophilic character.However, it was not so high as in the case of titania nanotube layers.The results of wettability studies on titania nanowires point out the diverse character of their surface, as all samples are highly hydrophobic.Analysis of changes in the surface free energy, estimated based on the Owens-Wendt method [59], which uses the values of contact angles for polar and dispersive liquid (water and diiodomethane, respectively), revealed that the original value of surface free energy (Ti6Al4V-45.4mJ/m 2 ) after surface modifications using the electrochemical, chemical, and thermal method generally did not lead to great changes.Surface free energy (SFE) values range from 31.5 to 58.0 mJ/m 2 .Only three samples (Ti6Al4V/TNT20, Ti6Al4V/TNT30, and Ti6Al4V/TNT40) possess visibly higher SFE values: 65, 70, and 71 mJ/m 2 , respectively.
Table 1.Results of the contact angle and surface free energy (SFE) measurements; contact angles were measured three times using distilled water and diiodomethane, and the SFE was determined using the Owens-Wendt method.

Wettability and Surface Energy of Titania Nanoarchitectures
The wettability of all studied samples was estimated based on the contact angle measurements of water droplets deposited on the sample surface (Table 1).For the samples Ti6Al4V/TNT5-Ti6Al4V/TNT40 the hydrophilicity of the coatings increases with the increase of the nanotube diameter.While the use of higher potentials (50, 60 V), led to the increase of hydrophobicity of produced Ti6Al4V/TNT50 and Ti6Al4V/TNT60 systems.In comparison to the reference sample (pure titanium alloy), the amorphous titania nanofiber coatings revealed clear hydrophilic character.However, it was not so high as in the case of titania nanotube layers.The results of wettability studies on titania nanowires point out the diverse character of their surface, as all samples are highly hydrophobic.Analysis of changes in the surface free energy, estimated based on the Owens-Wendt method [59], which uses the values of contact angles for polar and dispersive liquid (water and diiodomethane, respectively), revealed that the original value of surface free energy (Ti6Al4V-45.4mJ/m 2 ) after surface modifications using the electrochemical, chemical, and thermal method generally did not lead to great changes.Surface free energy (SFE) values range from 31.5 to 58.0 mJ/m 2 .Only three samples (Ti6Al4V/TNT20, Ti6Al4V/TNT30, and Ti6Al4V/TNT40) possess visibly higher SFE values: 65, 70, and 71 mJ/m 2 , respectively.
Table 1.Results of the contact angle and surface free energy (SFE) measurements; contact angles were measured three times using distilled water and diiodomethane, and the SFE was determined using the Owens-Wendt method.

Specific Surface Area According to BET Theory
Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) theory, which is an extension of the Langmuir theory, is the basis for the measurement of specific surface area.This methodology has been used in the estimation of the specific surface area of studied systems: TNT, TNF, and TNW.Nitrogen was the employed as gaseous adsorbate used for surface probing by BET methods.The results of BET investigations, in the form of surface specific area values [m 2 /g] of titania coatings characterized by nanotubular, fibrous, and wire-like architecture, are presented in Table 2.

Band Gap Characteristic
To estimate the band gap values for studied titania samples of different nanoarchitecture and structure, diffuse reflectance UV-Vis spectra (UV-VIS-DRS) have been registered.Assuming indirect bandgap for titania n = 2 and considering that absorption coefficient α is proportional to Kubelka-Munk function, the band gap energy can be obtained from the plots of (αhν) 2 vs. hν as the intercept at (αhν) 2 = 0 of the extrapolated linear part of the plot.The intersection of the straight line at the photon energy axis gives the value to E g .Figure 7 presents UV-VIS-DRS spectra registered for TNT (a), TNF (b), and TNW (c), as well as plots of (αhν) 2 vs. hν, which were used to calculate the energy difference between the valence band and the conduction band in studied semiconductor samples.In Table 3 detailed band gap values are presented.

Photocatalytic Activity Results
Results referring to kinetic measurements focused on the photodegradation process of methylene blue and acetone under UV light irradiation are presented in Figures 8-12 and in Table S1.The results involve all three kinds of nanolayers presented in this paper.Concentration-time dependencies for acetone photodegradation are linear in the whole studied range and exponential for experiments with methylene blue.The initial concentration of CO 2 equal ca.400 ppm (see in Figure 8) results from measurement technique.Application of some known level of initial CO 2 concentration instead of a complete CO 2 removing before reaction measurement was a much more simple approach and allowed to gather the results with completely the same quality.

Photocatalytic Activity Results
Results referring to kinetic measurements focused on the photodegradation process of methylene blue and acetone under UV light irradiation are presented in Figures 8-12 and in Table S1.The results involve all three kinds of nanolayers presented in this paper.Concentration-time dependencies for acetone photodegradation are linear in the whole studied range and exponential for experiments with methylene blue.The initial concentration of CO2 equal ca.400 ppm (see in Figure 8) results from measurement technique.Application of some known level of initial CO2 concentration instead of a complete CO2 removing before reaction measurement was a much more simple approach and allowed to gather the results with completely the same quality.

Photocatalytic Activity Results
Results referring to kinetic measurements focused on the photodegradation process of methylene blue and acetone under UV light irradiation are presented in Figures 8-12 and in Table S1.The results involve all three kinds of nanolayers presented in this paper.Concentration-time dependencies for acetone photodegradation are linear in the whole studied range and exponential for experiments with methylene blue.The initial concentration of CO2 equal ca.400 ppm (see in Figure 8) results from measurement technique.Application of some known level of initial CO2 concentration instead of a complete CO2 removing before reaction measurement was a much more simple approach and allowed to gather the results with completely the same quality.

Discussion
The application of simple methods for the production of TiO2 layers, using electrochemical, chemical, and thermal oxidation of the titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), allowed for obtaining coating materials characterized by different nanoarchitecture: nanotubes (TNT), nanofibers (TNF), and nanowires (TNW), respectively.The results of my works exhibited that the change one of the manufacturing process parameters (e.g., potential during the anodic oxidation process or temperature in the case of chemical/thermal oxidation process) enabled to control the structure and morphology of produced nanocoatings, thus, controlling their photocatalytic activity.In the case of TNT layers, the tube diameters were strictly dependent on the potential applied during the anodic oxidation, e.g., in the potential range of 5 to 40V, the tube diameters grew with increasing of the potential used.Simultaneously, at higher potentials (50, 60V), such a relationship was not found (Figure 1).The structural characterization of TNT coatings proved their amorphousness, which was expected especially without subjecting of the produced systems to annealing [60].The diameter changes of titania nanotubes are closely related to changes in their hydrophilicity.Studied TNT coatings showed visible hydrophilicity versus the pure titanium alloy surface, as a reference sample.In practice the linear tendency of hydrophilic properties increase of TNT coatings was noticed in the row TNT5 > TNT10 > TNT15 > TNT20 > TNT30 > TNT40, i.e., from the contact angle value 64.5° for TNT5 up to 19.3° for TNT40.Disorders in the surface morphology of TNT50 and TNT60 coatings caused a rapid increase of the contact angle to 55.6° and 75.1°, respectively, and in the same way increase of hydrophobicity.
The chemical oxidation of Ti6Al4V samples with the use of H2O2 solution as an oxidation agent at elevated temperature (80-140 °C), allowed me to receive a set of samples with surface morphology similar to nanofibers.The use of lower temperatures (80-120 °C) led to obtain delicate fibers, somehow tangled in a continuous layer, while the temperature of 140 °C forced the formation of fibers glued together on the surface in such a way that there are free spaces between the frames.Probably the presence of these spaces favors the entry of water and, hence, the better hydrophilicity of this system compared to the others.What is worth to underline, sample TNF140, as well as TNF120, are not completely amorphous and Raman spectra proved the presence of anatase crystallites, which were not visible in the spectra of TNF80 and TNF100.
The temperature was also an important factor in the production of TiO2 nanowires by thermal oxidation of the titanium alloy Ti6Al4V in the presence of Ar containing traces of oxygen.Layers consisted of dense-packed thin needles/wires with anatase structure (which was proved by Raman spectroscopy.Figure 6) were produced on the surface of Ti6Al4V samples annealed at 475 °C.The

Discussion
The application of simple methods for the production of TiO 2 layers, using electrochemical, chemical, and thermal oxidation of the titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), allowed for obtaining coating materials characterized by different nanoarchitecture: nanotubes (TNT), nanofibers (TNF), and nanowires (TNW), respectively.The results of my works exhibited that the change one of the manufacturing process parameters (e.g., potential during the anodic oxidation process or temperature in the case of chemical/thermal oxidation process) enabled to control the structure and morphology of produced nanocoatings, thus, controlling their photocatalytic activity.In the case of TNT layers, the tube diameters were strictly dependent on the potential applied during the anodic oxidation, e.g., in the potential range of 5 to 40 V, the tube diameters grew with increasing of the potential used.Simultaneously, at higher potentials (50, 60 V), such a relationship was not found (Figure 1).The structural characterization of TNT coatings proved their amorphousness, which was expected especially without subjecting of the produced systems to annealing [60].The diameter changes of titania nanotubes are closely related to changes in their hydrophilicity.Studied TNT coatings showed visible hydrophilicity versus the pure titanium alloy surface, as a reference sample.In practice the linear tendency of hydrophilic properties increase of TNT coatings was noticed in the row TNT5 > TNT10 > TNT15 > TNT20 > TNT30 > TNT40, i.e., from the contact angle value 64.5 • for TNT5 up to 19.3 • for TNT40.Disorders in the surface morphology of TNT50 and TNT60 coatings caused a rapid increase of the contact angle to 55.6 • and 75.1 • , respectively, and in the same way increase of hydrophobicity.
The chemical oxidation of Ti6Al4V samples with the use of H 2 O 2 solution as an oxidation agent at elevated temperature (80-140 • C), allowed me to receive a set of samples with surface morphology similar to nanofibers.The use of lower temperatures (80-120 • C) led to obtain delicate fibers, somehow tangled in a continuous layer, while the temperature of 140 • C forced the formation of fibers glued together on the surface in such a way that there are free spaces between the frames.Probably the presence of these spaces favors the entry of water and, hence, the better hydrophilicity of this system compared to the others.What is worth to underline, sample TNF140, as well as TNF120, are not completely amorphous and Raman spectra proved the presence of anatase crystallites, which were not visible in the spectra of TNF80 and TNF100.
The temperature was also an important factor in the production of TiO 2 nanowires by thermal oxidation of the titanium alloy Ti6Al4V in the presence of Ar containing traces of oxygen.Layers consisted of dense-packed thin needles/wires with anatase structure (which was proved by Raman spectroscopy.Figure 6) were produced on the surface of Ti6Al4V samples annealed at 475 • C. The raising of the process temperature to 500 • C caused a change in the morphology of the surface layer.Instead of densely packed sharp-pointed needles, whose distribution on the surface of the alloy resembles a shaggy carpet, I received tightly packed rods with rounded ends, more than 3 to 5 times thicker than needles.This nanoarchitecture possesses anatase/rutile structure, which was proved by Raman spectroscopy and GAXRD studies (Figure 6).The use of even higher temperatures (550 • C, 600 • C) leads to obtaining of anatase/rutile and pure rutile systems, respectively, densely packed and arranged in the form of cuboids with mutual walls.The poor wettability of these systems (all analyzed systems turned out to be strongly hydrophobic) can be associated with this densely packed nanoarchitecture.
Studied systems were characterized in terms of specific surface area (S BET ) on the basis of BET measurements.The biggest value of S BET has been noticed for titania nanowires obtained during thermal oxidation of titanium alloy at 475 • C. Looking at SEM image of this coating it is easy to explain this state of affairs-needle-like architecture allows for an easy nitrogen molecules penetration of the layer.Such easy penetration does not take place in case of next titania nanowire coatings.S BET values for TNW 500, TNW550, and TNW600 are twice, three times, and four times smaller, respectively.The dense packing of rods, which do not allow for deep penetration of the layer through nitrogen molecules, can be the factor, which reduces the specific surface area.S BET values obtained for titania nanofibers are in the range of 21.3 to 23.7 m 2 /g for amorphous and amorphous/anatase titania nanofibers obtained at 80, 100, and 120 • C. Anatase nanofibers obtained during chemical oxidation of titanium alloy with the use of H 2 O 2 at 140 • C possess bigger specific surface area-31.2m 2 /g, which is in accordance with the surface morphology-this sample surface is characterized by compact systems, consisting of sticking together clusters of nanofibers, intersected by grooves having a width of about 100 nm.Review of literature data about BET studies on titania nanofibers shows that obtained values are in accordance with them.Ghosh et al. studied mesoporous TiO 2 nanofibers with a controlled diameter to characterize the influence of the structure, morphology, and specific surface area on photocatalytic activity.During their studies, they calculated S BET values for samples, and they were in the region 3.40-29.50m 2 /g [61].Lee et al. analyzed TiO 2 and TiO 2 /Ag nanofibers, and they obtained for titania S BET value equal to 34.4 m 2 /g.[62].Considering the results of these measurements carried out on titania nanotube coatings it can be stated that with the increase of nanotubes diameter, the value of specific surface area decreases.The same tendency was visible in my earlier research [63].Some anomalies occur in the case of nanotube layers obtained at potentials of 50 and 60 V.In the case of these systems, the increase of applied potential did not cause the creation of nanotubes with the largest diameters.The diameters began to gradually decrease, and the surface became less homogeneous.Simultaneously, the specific surface area value increases for TNT50 and TNT60 in comparison to samples obtained at 40 V and 30 V. Looking at Figure 1c,d,g,h, one can have the impression that the diameters of the nanotubes produced at the potential of 15 V and 20 V are similar to the diameters of nanotubes produced at potentials 50 V and 60 V.The systems differ only in the surface homogeneity-the systems produced at 15 and 20 V are definitely more homogeneous, and those produced at 50 and 60 V are not as uniform.
For all the obtained systems the UV-VIS-DRS spectra were registered to determine the energy gap value (E BG ).The band gap energy values were estimated from the plots of (αhν) 2 vs. hν as the intercept at (αhν) 2 = 0 of the extrapolated linear part of the plot (Figure 7, Table 3).In the case of amorphous titania nanotube coatings, the values of E BG were decreasing from 3.64 eV up to 3.34 eV for TNT5 to TNT40, respectively.This red shift in band gap energy and values are in accordance with the literature data [64,65].Simultaneously, analysis of data presented in Table 3 revealed that E BG values appointed for TNT40, TNT50, and TNT60 samples are higher than for TNT30 one (they are much more similar to TNT15 and TNT20 samples).A similar dependency was found in the case of specific surface area.It can be associated with the morphology similarities of TNT40, TNT50, and TNT60 to TNT15, TNT20 samples (Figure 13, Figure 1).The nanotubes, which built TNT40, TNT50, and TNT60 coatings possess smaller nanotubes inside.These inner nanotubes have the diameters similar to nanotubes which built TNT15, TNT20 samples.The higher EBG values (3.55, 3.43 eV) were noticed for amorphous TNF80 and TNF100 coatings, whereas, in the case of TNF120 sample for which the anatase nanocrystals presence was confirmed (Figure 4), the energy band gap decreases to 3.36 eV.For the anatase TNF coating (TNF140 sample) the EBG = 3.22 eV was found, which was close to the theoretical value for anatase (3.2 eV) [66].In the case of titania nanowires layers, produced as a result of the thermal oxidation of Ti6Al4V substrate which revealed anatase (TNW475), anatase/rutile (TNW500, TNW550), and rutile (TNW600) structures, the energy band gap values are similar to those published in the literature: TNW475-anatase (3.24 eV), TNW500 (3.11 eV), TNW550 (3.01 eV), and TNW600-rutile form (2.96 eV) [67,68].The decrease of the EBG value is strictly connected to structural differences of studied samples, and these values provide additional evidence for the crystallinity systems of anatase and rutile.
Using the produced TiO2 systems, so varied in the structure, morphology, and characterized by different specific surface area values (SBET) and energy band gap values (EBG), and commercially available Pilkington Glass ActivTM as reference sample with high photocatalytic activity, methylene blue and acetone degradation tests were carried out.The activity of all the studied samples was induced using UV light.The results of my works revealed clear differences in photodegradation rates for methylene blue (MB) and acetone (Ac) under applied conditions.According to these data Ac undergoes photodegradation significantly slower than MB.After several hours, the concentration of CO2, which is one of two final products of Ac degradation, increases with the same rate as just after the reaction initiation.It manifests by a linear trend of the concentration-time data plot (Figure 8).Contrary, the decrease of MB concentration has exponential character, (Figure 9), similar to those visible in the literature [69,70].It forces the application of two different approaches to experimental data.Details on these approaches are described in Materials and Methods.It caused that both rate constants cannot be compared with each other.However, it is clear that reaction with acetone was significantly slower in the applied conditions.Analysis of data presented in Figures 10-12 shows that both of photodegradation pathways are faster when titania nanowires or nanofibers have been used as photocatalysts.The photocatalytic effect caused by titania nanotubes is clearly lower (Figure 10).One of the most active photocatalytically nanotube coatings is TNT40.TNT50 and TNT60 are the weakest photocatalysts of the studied samples.In case of the MB photodegradation, photoactivity of the reference Pilkington Glass ActivTM is almost three times higher than the medium activity of other TNT surfaces.In case of the reaction of acetone, the effect is more typical.The kobs A values are the highest for TNT40, and generally, the shape of the curve involving all TNT samples is similar to the Gaussian curve.The TNT30 and TNT40 samples revealed higher photocatalytic activity than Pilkington glass and, therefore, seem to be an interesting example of the surface for next optimizations.It is hard to explain this fact by specific surface area, as these samples were characterized by the smallest values of SBET among studies TNT samples.However, their energy band gap values are the smallest and the most similar to the literature bandgap value of the best titania structure-anatase [67,68].Generally, TNT coatings catalyze the MB The higher E BG values (3.55, 3.43 eV) were noticed for amorphous TNF80 and TNF100 coatings, whereas, in the case of TNF120 sample for which the anatase nanocrystals presence was confirmed (Figure 4), the energy band gap decreases to 3.36 eV.For the anatase TNF coating (TNF140 sample) the EBG = 3.22 eV was found, which was close to the theoretical value for anatase (3.2 eV) [66].In the case of titania nanowires layers, produced as a result of the thermal oxidation of Ti6Al4V substrate which revealed anatase (TNW475), anatase/rutile (TNW500, TNW550), and rutile (TNW600) structures, the energy band gap values are similar to those published in the literature: TNW475-anatase (3.24 eV), TNW500 (3.11 eV), TNW550 (3.01 eV), and TNW600-rutile form (2.96 eV) [67,68].The decrease of the E BG value is strictly connected to structural differences of studied samples, and these values provide additional evidence for the crystallinity systems of anatase and rutile.
Using the produced TiO 2 systems, so varied in the structure, morphology, and characterized by different specific surface area values (S BET ) and energy band gap values (E BG ), and commercially available Pilkington Glass ActivTM as reference sample with high photocatalytic activity, methylene blue and acetone degradation tests were carried out.The activity of all the studied samples was induced using UV light.The results of my works revealed clear differences in photodegradation rates for methylene blue (MB) and acetone (Ac) under applied conditions.According to these data Ac undergoes photodegradation significantly slower than MB.After several hours, the concentration of CO 2 , which is one of two final products of Ac degradation, increases with the same rate as just after the reaction initiation.It manifests by a linear trend of the concentration-time data plot (Figure 8).Contrary, the decrease of MB concentration has exponential character, (Figure 9), similar to those visible in the literature [69,70].It forces the application of two different approaches to experimental data.Details on these approaches are described in Materials and Methods.It caused that both rate constants cannot be compared with each other.However, it is clear that reaction with acetone was significantly slower in the applied conditions.Analysis of data presented in Figures 10-12 shows that both of photodegradation pathways are faster when titania nanowires or nanofibers have been used as photocatalysts.The photocatalytic effect caused by titania nanotubes is clearly lower (Figure 10).One of the most active photocatalytically nanotube coatings is TNT40.TNT50 and TNT60 are the weakest photocatalysts of the studied samples.In case of the MB photodegradation, photoactivity of the reference Pilkington Glass ActivTM is almost three times higher than the medium activity of other TNT surfaces.In case of the reaction of acetone, the effect is more typical.The k obs A values are the highest for TNT40, and generally, the shape of the curve involving all TNT samples is similar to the Gaussian curve.The TNT30 and TNT40 samples revealed higher photocatalytic activity than Pilkington glass and, therefore, seem to be an interesting example of the surface for next optimizations.It is hard to explain this fact by specific surface area, as these samples were characterized by the smallest values of S BET among studies TNT samples.However, their energy band gap values are the smallest and the most similar to the literature bandgap value of the best titania structure-anatase [67,68].Generally, TNT coatings catalyze the MB photodegradation process significantly weaker than photodegradation of Ac.Such a significant difference in reactivity can be related to the size of the molecule: acetone is smaller than MB, and it is easier to adsorb a small molecule than a bigger one, which generates sterically hindrances for the next molecules approaching surface.Titania nanofibers photocatalytic activity is similar for both MB and Ac.Moreover, the order of photoactivity is similar, and the rate of degradation increases with the increasing temperature, which was used in the production of TNF samples (Figure 10).In both cases, between TNF100 and TNF120 a distinct increase in the k obs is seen.It can be the consequence of the presence of a crystalline form of titania in the structure of TNF120, as well as in the structure of TNF140.Figure 4 shows that bands attributed to anatase crystallites are visible in Raman spectra of TNF120 and TNF140.The impact of crystallinity of the samples is additionally proved by UV-VIS studies and calculated E BG values, which are for TNF 140 almost identical with literature data available for anatase, and for TNF120-close to this values [67,68].The specific surface area is the biggest for TNF 140, which can be treated as the next factor increasing this sample's photoactivity.Samples TNF140 and TNT120 degrade both compounds: MB and Ac faster than Pilkington Glass Activ TM .Their potential in future applications is also significant.
In the case of titania nanowires, the higher photocatalytic activity was noticed for TNW samples produced at lower temperatures (Figure 11).This trend is almost linear in case of MB photodegradation, as with the increase of used oxidation process temperature from 475 to 600 • C and with simultaneous transition from the form of anatase, through a mixed system, to rutile, the photocatalytic activity decreases.The only exception is noticed for the photodegradation of Ac, for which TNW500 is definitely the most active.It should be noted that photocatalytic activity of selected TNWs samples (TNW 500 in the case of Ac photodegradation, and TNW457, TNW500 in the case MB photodegradation) were similar to the reference surface, i.e., Pilkington Glass Activ TM .It can be explained by the presence of anatase nanocrystallites in the structure of TNW475 and TNW500 samples (Figure 6).The appearance of signals indicating the presence of rutile indicates structural changes, which occur during the synthesis of systems at higher temperatures (550 and 600 • C).The addition of the rutile form in the structure of the layer resulted in a significant reduction in photocatalytic activity of the studied systems, in particular in the reaction of acetone degradation.Energy band gap values of titania nanowires in the form of anatase and rutile are close to the literature values, and there are an additional proof of their nanocrystallity on the presence of anatase crystallites [67,68].
Considering received results of my photocatalytical experiments, it should be noted that differences in the observable rate constants for different produced coating materials, i.e., TNT, TNF, and TNW, seem to be more distinct for photodegradation of smaller acetone in comparison to the relatively huge MB.It suggests that small organic molecules, such as acetone, are a better indicator of titania nanomaterials photoactivity.The easiest explanation is based on the size of acetone.This small non-charged molecule is an excellent reactant to test a surface susceptibility toward adsorption and catalytic activity because its size reduces additional disturbing factors, such as hindering the activity evaluation.Moreover, the mechanism of MB degradation on the surface of nanoporous titania is quite complicated and not only one model of degradation is known [71,72].The titania-based photocatalytic oxidation in water is not selective by contrast with the selective mild oxidation in pure organic gaseous or liquid phase of aliphatic or substituted aromatic hydrocarbons performed with the same titania catalyst as discussed in [73].Two oxidative agents can be considered: the photo-produced holes h+ (mainly involved in the decarboxylation reaction) and/or the OH• radicals, which are known as strongly active and degrading but non-selective agents and can be generated by oxidation of water by holes or transient formation of hydroperoxide radicals.Since the reactant is cationic, electron donor photo-holes are certainly not concerned by the initial step.On the other hand, the OH − radicals can attack the C-S+=C functional group in MB, which is in direct coulombic interaction with titania's surface.Therefore, the initial step of MB degradation can be ascribed to the cleavage of the bonds of the C-S+=C functional group in MB.A detailed reaction mechanism could be presented from the initial step of adsorption involving the cationic functional group of MB molecule, which is probably adsorbed perpendicularly to the surface down to the final products (CO 2 , SO 4 2− , NH 4 + and NO 3 − ).
The degradation intermediates originated from the initial opening of the central aromatic ring, and their subsequent metabolites were formed in agreement with general rules already put in evidence in the degradation of other complex molecules in water.

Electrochemical Oxidation of Ti6Al4V
Titanium alloy substrates (Ti6Al4V foil, grade 5.70 mm × 7 mm × 0.25 mm) have been ground with abrasive paper, degreased (ultrasonic bath, 5 min/ethanol, 5 min/acetone, 5 min/water) and activated in the solution of HF:HNO 3 :H 2 O (molar ratio-1:4:5, time-30 s).Such prepared substrates were subjected to 30 min of electrochemical oxidation in the presence of electrolyte (aqueous HF solution, C = 0.3%), using a platinum rod as a cathode and using the following potential values: 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 V.After the process samples were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath (water with a pinch of aluminum oxide, 10 min), they were rinsed with water and dried in a stream of argon.

Chemical Oxidation of Ti6Al4V
Titanium alloy substrates (Ti6Al4V foil, grade 5.70 mm × 7 mm × 0.25 mm) were ground with abrasive paper, degreased (ultrasonic bath, 5 min/ethanol, 5 min/acetone, 5 min/water) and activated in the solution of HCl:H 2 O (molar ratio-1:1, time-30 min, temperature-80 • C).Such prepared substrates were subjected to 4 h of Ti6Al4V chemical oxidation using a system with reflux condenser, in the presence of H 2 O 2 solution (C = 30%), which was heated up to 80, 100, 120, and 140 • C.After the process samples have been cleaned in an ultrasonic bath (distilled water, 10 min) and then dried in a stream of argon.

Wettability Studies and Surface Free Energy Estimation
The wettability and surface free energy of the produced titania nanocoatings were determined using the earlier described method [74,75].The contact angle of water and diiodomethane was measured using a goniometer with drop shape analysis software (DSA 10 Krüss GmbH, Hamburg, Germany).Each measurement was carried out three times, immediately after deposition of the drop.The volume of the distilled water drop in the contact angle measurement was 3 µL and the volume of the diiodomethane drop was 4 µL.Both contact angles values were used to estimate the value of the surface free energy, basing on mathematical calculations, which were performed using the Owens-Wendt method [59].

Specific Surface Area Estimation According to BET analysis
Studies on BET specific surface area were done using the ASAP 2010 Micromeritics (Micromeritics France S.A., Verneuil Halatte, France).The samples were heated (desorbed) before measurement at 70 • C, to achieve a final pressure of 0.001 mbar, over 8 h.After the desorption process, the samples were weighed and placed in a measuring station, in the temperature of liquid nitrogen, in which the nitrogen adsorption isotherms were determined.4.7.Band Gap Characterization on the Basis of Diffuse Reflectance UV-Vis Spectroscopy UV-Vis spectra were registered in the range of 250 to 700 nm using spectrophotometer Jasco V-750 (JASCO Deutschland GmbH, Pfungstadt, Germany) equipped with an integrating sphere for diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.The recorded spectra were analyzed in terms of energy band gap values using Spectra ManagerTM CFR software (JASCO Deutschland GmbH, Pfungstadt, Germany).

Photoactivity Test
The photocatalytic activity of the produced titania coatings was estimated using: (a) the most used procedure in the literature, i.e., methylene blue (MB, 3 cm 3 ) photodegradation, as well as (b) acetone (0.1 cm 3 ) photodegradation.The temperature during the experiments was constant at 23 • C. In all experiments, I was waiting 30 min for the adsorption equilibria (in the darkness), after the samples of the porous materials were (a) immersed in the aqueous 10 −5 M methylene blue solution or (b) placed inside the homemade reactor, equipped with CO 2 detector, to which the volatile acetone had been delivered.Then, they were illuminated by UV radiation (18 W, range of 340 to 410 nm with a maximum at 365 nm, UV irradiance on the film surface was measured to be 0.8 mW/cm 2 ).The changes in MB concentration (absorbance measured at λ = 660 nm) were registered every 24 h for seven days by spectrophotometric analysis (Metertech SP-830 PLUS).The concentration of CO 2 generated in the acetone degradation process was read based on the signal from the detector every hour for 24 h.Pilkington Glass Activ TM samples were subjected to the same tests, treating them as reference system with high photocatalytic activity.All analyzed samples had dimensions of 7 mm × 7 mm.During calculations, the blind tests (degradation without UV and titania samples) were considered.

Kinetic Calculations
Photoactivity of nanomaterials analyzed in this paper was determined quantitatively according to the Langmuir-Hinshelwood reaction mechanism [76].Thus, a general rate of reaction can be expressed as: r = dc/dt = k obs ' Kc/(1 + Kc) where c is a reactant (MB or acetone) concentration; t is time of the concentration measurement; k obs ' is an observed rate constant, and K describes the reactant adsorption process.Significantly low concentration of the reactants ([MB] ca. 10 −5 M and gaseous acetone), as well as a lack of saturation for both reactant's concentrations during their photodegradation, suggest that photodegradation processes occur according to the pseudo-first-order kinetics.Low values of c and K allow simplifying Equation (1) to the following form: Considering linearity of the concentration-time dependencies it is clear that, in case of acetone photodegradation, its concentration is almost constant due to its relatively high initial concentration (0.015 cm 3 of liquid acetone injected to the reaction chamber) in relation to the monitored reaction time and amount of CO 2 generated during photodegradation (ca.50-500 ppm).Thus, concentration c in Equation ( 2) is constant and can be involved in the observable rate constant.Finally, Equation (2) applied to the reactions of methylene blue and acetone has the form: dc/dt = k obs A (4) In result, the concentration-time dependencies for both photodegradation processes are described by the following different equations: where c t is the reactant concentration after time t; c 0 is its starting concentration of MB, k obs MB is a pseudo-first-order observable rate constant for MB degradation, and k obs A is a pseudo-zero-order observable rate constant for acetone degradation.Application of two different kinetic approaches for the studied reactions was forced by differences in the absorbance-time data behavior.In case of experiments with methylene blue where the exponential decrease of the dye concentration is visible, the exponential Equation ( 5) can be applied whereas such procedure for the acetone degradation process would be a form of rashness.Thus, a linear Equation ( 6) has been used instead to avoid too uncertain conclusions.

Conclusions
The comparative analysis of photocatalytic activity of three completely different in terms of structure and morphology, titania coatings (nanotubes, nanofibers, and nanowires) with the reference sample-Pilkington Glass Activ TM showed that titania nanofibers obtained at 140 and 120 • C, possessing anatase and anatase/amorphous structure, as well as titania nanowires obtained at 475 and 500 • C, possessing anatase and anatase/rutile structure, were better photocatalyst than Pilkington Glass Activ TM .Completely amorphous titania nanotubes, turned out to be an interesting alternative for photocatalytic materials in the form of thin films.However, their photocatalytic activity is lower than for Pilkington Glass Activ TM .The results of my previous work showed that this type of coating exhibited adequate bioactivity, which allows their use as coating biomaterials in the design and construction of implants [77][78][79].Their photoactivity enriches the set of their properties because UV-induced photocatalytic activity in the degradation of organic compounds can be used in the processes of UV implant sterilization.

Funding:
The APC was funded by Nano-implant Ltd.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Diffuse reflectance UV-Vis spectra of TNT (a), TNF (b), and TNW (c)-the left side; plots of (αhν) 2 vs. hν with the explanation the procedure of band gap value estimation-the right side.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Diffuse reflectance UV-Vis spectra of TNT (a), TNF (b), and TNW (c)-the left side; plots of (αhν) 2 vs. hν with the explanation the procedure of band gap value estimation-the right side.

Figure 10 .Figure 11 .
Figure 10.The observable rate constants for methylene blue and acetone degradation under UV light irradiation in the presence of titania nanotubes.

Figure 10 . 22 !Figure 10 .
Figure 10.The observable rate constants for methylene blue and acetone degradation under UV light irradiation in the presence of titania nanotubes.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.The observable rate constants for methylene blue and acetone degradation under UV light irradiation in the presence of titania nanofibers.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.The observable rate constants for methylene blue and acetone degradation under UV light irradiation in the presence of titania nanofibers.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.The observable rate constants for methylene blue and acetone degradation under UV light irradiation in the presence of titania nanowires.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.The observable rate constants for methylene blue and acetone degradation under UV light irradiation in the presence of titania nanowires.

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.SEM images of TNT40, TNT50, TNT60, which present in detail the inner part of nanotubes.

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.SEM images of TNT40, TNT50, TNT60, which present in detail the inner part of nanotubes.
• C differs from the others, as it forms more compact systems, consisting of sticking together clusters of nanofibers, intersected by grooves having a width of about 100 nm.