Photocatalytic Reversible Reactions Driven by Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance

In this study, we review photocatalytic reversible surface catalytic reactions driven by localized surface plasmon resonance. Firstly, we briefly introduce the synthesis of 4,4′-dimercaptoazobenzene (DMAB) from 4-nitrobenzenethiol (4NBT) using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) technology. Furthermore, we study the photosynthetic and degradation processes of 4NBT to DMAB reduction, as well as factors associated with them, such as laser wavelength, reaction time, substrate, and pH. Last but not least, we reveal the competitive relationship between photosynthetic and degradation pathways for this reduction reaction by SERS technology on the substrate of Au film over a nanosphere.


Introduction
Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) and tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) are widely used in the fields of physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, and materials, and they are highly sensitive molecular-detection tools that play a significant role in research on the electronic structure and spectral properties of molecules and plasmon-driven chemical reactions [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Recently, we studied the physical mechanism of plasmon-enhanced resonance Raman and fluorescence spectra [10] to understand the applications and principles of photoinduced charge transfer [11]. Furthermore, SERS made significant contributions to the study of heterostructures in two-dimensional materials [12], and significant advances were made in the application of nonlinear optical microscopy [13]. At the same time, it is a significantly important tool for probing chemical signals about molecules adsorbed onto metal substrates, such as Au, Ag, and Cu. It is also a promising technology for detecting plasmon-driven catalytic mechanisms. This technique is extremely sensitive to detecting high field-enhancement regions on a plasmon substrate. Many research results show that an electromagnetic field is an important part of the SERS enhancement mechanism, which is generated by the amplification and localization of incident electromagnetic waves.
Authors researched the effects of photoreduction-field enhancement from 4NBT to DMAB driven by plasmon on Au, Ag, and Cu [25][26][27]. The molecular structure of 4NBT and DMAB are shown in Figure 1 [28]. Studies showed that there was a higher active SERS in a diluted HNO 3 solution for Cu substrates by using a 632.8-nm He/Ne laser. However, it could not be ruled out that Cu may also be an effective photoelectron emitter under a wavelength condition of 632.8 nm. The SERS spectrum on Cu-adsorbed 4NBT could be significantly converted into an SERS spectrum of another substance, such as 4-aminobenzenethiol (4ABT). Simultaneously, the authors studied the time-, substrate-, and wavelength-dependent surface catalysis reduction reaction of 4NBT to DMAB under the assisting condition of plasmon on Au, Ag, and Cu [29]. In Figure 2, atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of Au, Ag, and Cu films are displayed. Studies showed that this kind of reduction reaction of 4NBT to DMAB was significantly dependent on wavelength, substrates, and reaction time. When the wavelength was 632.8 nm, the reaction of 4NBT to DMAB did not occur on the Cu film substrate when the reaction time exceeded two hours. In contrast, 4NBT was quickly converted to DMAB when the wavelength was 514.5 nm. Thus, it was rational to control this reduction reaction by adjusting some of the factors mentioned above. Plasmon hot electrons provide high kinetic energy to overcome the reaction barrier for dissociation, and the electrons for photodissociation.
Catalysts 2019, x, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 14 solution for Cu substrates by using a 632.8-nm He/Ne laser. However, it could not be ruled out that Cu may also be an effective photoelectron emitter under a wavelength condition of 632.8 nm. The SERS spectrum on Cu-adsorbed 4NBT could be significantly converted into an SERS spectrum of another substance, such as 4-aminobenzenethiol (4ABT). Simultaneously, the authors studied the time-, substrate-, and wavelength-dependent surface catalysis reduction reaction of 4NBT to DMAB under the assisting condition of plasmon on Au, Ag, and Cu [29]. In Figure 2, atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of Au, Ag, and Cu films are displayed. Studies showed that this kind of reduction reaction of 4NBT to DMAB was significantly dependent on wavelength, substrates, and reaction time. When the wavelength was 632.8 nm, the reaction of 4NBT to DMAB did not occur on the Cu film substrate when the reaction time exceeded two hours. In contrast, 4NBT was quickly converted to DMAB when the wavelength was 514.5 nm. Thus, it was rational to control this reduction reaction by adjusting some of the factors mentioned above. Plasmon hot electrons provide high kinetic energy to overcome the reaction barrier for dissociation, and the electrons for photodissociation.

Plasmon-Driven Surface Catalysis Reduction Reaction of 4NBT to DMAB
In this section, we focus on the time-and wavelength-dependent plasmon-driven surface catalysis reduction reaction of 4NBT to DMAB on an Au film. Sun et al. conducted some research on Au films and determined whether the rate and yield of the reaction were related to the wavelength of the used laser and the reaction time. In Figure 3a,b, SERS spectra of 4NBT are shown at the junction of an Ag NP on the Au film with the incident wavelength of 514.5 and 632.8 nm, respectively. Studies showed that, when the incident laser had a wavelength of 632.8 nm and the reaction time reached 2.5 h, 4NBT did not convert to DMAB, revealed by the Raman intensity of vs(NO2) on 4NBT. When the wavelength of the incident laser was 632.8 nm, the corresponding local electric-field distribution map of an Ag NP-Au film was as displayed in Figure 4. However, when  solution for Cu substrates by using a 632.8-nm He/Ne laser. However, it could not be ruled out that Cu may also be an effective photoelectron emitter under a wavelength condition of 632.8 nm. The SERS spectrum on Cu-adsorbed 4NBT could be significantly converted into an SERS spectrum of another substance, such as 4-aminobenzenethiol (4ABT). Simultaneously, the authors studied the time-, substrate-, and wavelength-dependent surface catalysis reduction reaction of 4NBT to DMAB under the assisting condition of plasmon on Au, Ag, and Cu [29]. In Figure 2, atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of Au, Ag, and Cu films are displayed. Studies showed that this kind of reduction reaction of 4NBT to DMAB was significantly dependent on wavelength, substrates, and reaction time. When the wavelength was 632.8 nm, the reaction of 4NBT to DMAB did not occur on the Cu film substrate when the reaction time exceeded two hours. In contrast, 4NBT was quickly converted to DMAB when the wavelength was 514.5 nm. Thus, it was rational to control this reduction reaction by adjusting some of the factors mentioned above. Plasmon hot electrons provide high kinetic energy to overcome the reaction barrier for dissociation, and the electrons for photodissociation.

Plasmon-Driven Surface Catalysis Reduction Reaction of 4NBT to DMAB
In this section, we focus on the time-and wavelength-dependent plasmon-driven surface catalysis reduction reaction of 4NBT to DMAB on an Au film. Sun et al. conducted some research on Au films and determined whether the rate and yield of the reaction were related to the wavelength of the used laser and the reaction time. In Figure 3a,b, SERS spectra of 4NBT are shown at the junction of an Ag NP on the Au film with the incident wavelength of 514.5 and 632.8 nm, respectively. Studies showed that, when the incident laser had a wavelength of 632.8 nm and the reaction time reached 2.5 h, 4NBT did not convert to DMAB, revealed by the Raman intensity of vs(NO2) on 4NBT. When the wavelength of the incident laser was 632.8 nm, the corresponding local electric-field distribution map of an Ag NP-Au film was as displayed in Figure 4. However, when

Plasmon-Driven Surface Catalysis Reduction Reaction of 4NBT to DMAB
In this section, we focus on the time-and wavelength-dependent plasmon-driven surface catalysis reduction reaction of 4NBT to DMAB on an Au film. Sun et al. conducted some research on Au films and determined whether the rate and yield of the reaction were related to the wavelength of the used laser and the reaction time. In Figure 3a,b, SERS spectra of 4NBT are shown at the junction of an Ag NP on the Au film with the incident wavelength of 514.5 and 632.8 nm, respectively. Studies showed that, when the incident laser had a wavelength of 632.8 nm and the reaction time reached 2.5 h, 4NBT did not convert to DMAB, revealed by the Raman intensity of v s (NO 2 ) on 4NBT. When the wavelength of the incident laser was 632.8 nm, the corresponding local electric-field distribution map of an Ag Catalysts 2019, 9,193 3 of 13 NP-Au film was as displayed in Figure 4. However, when the incident laser wavelength was 514.5 nm, the Raman signal was hardly detected after 2.5 h, indicating that the Au film was not a reasonable substrate under the condition of a 514.5-nm laser.
This mechanism indicates that the conversion of 4NBT to DMAB requires four electrons, and the required hot electrons were generated by plasmon decay, which had high kinetic energy, and the generated energy could drive the surface catalytic reaction.
By detecting the Raman signals of different incident-laser wavelengths and reaction times, the relationship between the surface catalytic reduction reaction of 4NBT to DMAB and the length of the reaction time was shown. The wavelength of the incident laser was also revealed, thus finding the optimal incident-laser wavelength and reaction time. Therefore, these two factors can be adjusted to promote or inhibit the surface catalytic reduction of 4NBT to DMAB on Au substrates. At the same time, plasmon resonance plays a key role in the surface catalytic reaction, and the energy that drives the reaction is generated by plasmon decay.    Here, the authors proposed a reaction mechanism for a surface catalytic reaction when the 4NBT is transformed into DMAB, as displayed in Figure 5. There are many ways to provide energy for plasmon-driven surface catalytic reactions, such as enhanced thermal surroundings, hot electric transfer, and increased scattering. Here, the authors mainly studied energy supply by hot electrons. This mechanism indicates that the conversion of 4NBT to DMAB requires four electrons, and the required hot electrons were generated by plasmon decay, which had high kinetic energy, and the generated energy could drive the surface catalytic reaction.
By detecting the Raman signals of different incident-laser wavelengths and reaction times, the relationship between the surface catalytic reduction reaction of 4NBT to DMAB and the length of the reaction time was shown. The wavelength of the incident laser was also revealed, thus finding the optimal incident-laser wavelength and reaction time. Therefore, these two factors can be adjusted to promote or inhibit the surface catalytic reduction of 4NBT to DMAB on Au substrates. At the same time, plasmon resonance plays a key role in the surface catalytic reaction, and the energy that drives the reaction is generated by plasmon decay.  In a previous study, control of the degradation reaction of DMAB was achieved, the chemical bond of DMAB was selectively broken using hot electrons as plasmon scissors, and the degradation process was related to various factors, such as pH. The authors controlled the dissociation products by pH, attaching hydrogen ions under acidic conditions to produce PATP. Under alkaline conditions, 4NBT was produced by attaching oxygen ions. In the next section, we present an in-depth discussion on what was more dominant in the synthesis and degradation process under different environmental conditions, as well as what had a higher conversion rate and a faster response rate.

Competition between Reaction and Degradation Pathways in Plasmon-Driven Photochemistry of 4NBT to DMAB
Plasmon materials are important for driving photochemical reactions. Previous studies showed that plasmon induced many photochemical reactions, but the corresponding reaction mechanism was not clear. In this section, the plasmon excitation field effect of plasmon excitation to promote the conversion of 4NBT to DMAB was investigated. For this reduction reaction, the increase in DMAB and decrease in 4NBT were related to time [30][31][32].
Plasmon nanostructures significantly contribute to driving photochemical reactions due to the powerful ability of plasmon nanostructures to focus and amplify various spectra [33][34][35][36]. Therefore, plasmon materials often act as a photocatalytic platform for inducing a lot of photochemical reactions. In previous studies, photoreactions were carried out, such as dissociation of H2 [37,38], In a previous study, control of the degradation reaction of DMAB was achieved, the chemical bond of DMAB was selectively broken using hot electrons as plasmon scissors, and the degradation process was related to various factors, such as pH. The authors controlled the dissociation products by pH, attaching hydrogen ions under acidic conditions to produce PATP. Under alkaline conditions, 4NBT was produced by attaching oxygen ions. In the next section, we present an in-depth discussion on what was more dominant in the synthesis and degradation process under different environmental conditions, as well as what had a higher conversion rate and a faster response rate.

Competition between Reaction and Degradation Pathways in Plasmon-Driven Photochemistry of 4NBT to DMAB
Plasmon materials are important for driving photochemical reactions. Previous studies showed that plasmon induced many photochemical reactions, but the corresponding reaction mechanism was not clear. In this section, the plasmon excitation field effect of plasmon excitation to promote the conversion of 4NBT to DMAB was investigated. For this reduction reaction, the increase in DMAB and decrease in 4NBT were related to time [30][31][32].
Plasmon nanostructures significantly contribute to driving photochemical reactions due to the powerful ability of plasmon nanostructures to focus and amplify various spectra [33][34][35][36]. Therefore, plasmon materials often act as a photocatalytic platform for inducing a lot of photochemical reactions. In previous studies, photoreactions were carried out, such as dissociation of H 2 [37,38], water decomposition [39,40], and reduction of CO 2 to hydrocarbon compounds [41,42]. This proved that plasmon-driven photoreactions have great potential. In this section, the authors used a substrate of Au film over a nanosphere (AuFON) to measure the yield and reaction rate of 4NBT photoreactions. In general, more field enhancement resulted in higher reaction yields. Unfortunately, this conjecture was not proven with the current technology. Studies showed that, for molecular degradation reactions, the reaction yield is highly dependent on electric-field strength.
where I SERS is the Raman intensity of 4NBT when wavenumber position is 1074 cm −1 on the AuFON substrate, and the corresponding Raman intensity in the solution is I NRS . N surf is the number of molecules that are adsorbed onto the substrate of AuFON, and N vol is the number of molecules in the sample collected by normal Raman scattering spectroscopy. The Raman cross-section of cyclohexane and 4NBT was collected in previous experiments [43,44]. In Figure 7 [45], we can see the time-resolved Raman spectroscopy of 4NBT plasmon-driven photocatalytic reactions. At the beginning, the vibration pattern appeared at 1338 cm −1 , as shown in the red part of the figure, indicating that 4NBT corresponds to NO2 symmetric stretching vibration [46]. During laser irradiation, new Raman peaks appeared at 1140, 1388, and 1434 cm −1 , as shown in  The AuFON substrate used here has many advantages because it was spherical, its random variation changed the detected SERS EF, and the resulting value was the enhanced average in the selected region. The authors schematically illustrated the reaction of field-enhancement effects for plasmon-driven photoreaction on 4NBT transfer to DMAB, as shown in Figure 6a. It is shown in Figure 6b that defects in the spherical fill might cause a change in the local surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) of the detection region, thereby increasing/decreasing extinction and widening at the position of the excitation wavelength. In addition, Figure 6b displays the wavelength of the 785-nm laser and the scattering wavelengths of the two important vibration modes detected during the photoreactions [45]. With the red-shift of laser wavelength, the Raman peaks at 1338 and 1433 cm −1 also changed, which revealed the relationship of surface catalytic wavelength reactions.
In Figure 7 [45], we can see the time-resolved Raman spectroscopy of 4NBT plasmon-driven photocatalytic reactions. At the beginning, the vibration pattern appeared at 1338 cm −1 , as shown in the red part of the figure, indicating that 4NBT corresponds to NO 2 symmetric stretching vibration [46]. During laser irradiation, new Raman peaks appeared at 1140, 1388, and 1434 cm −1 , as shown in the green portion of the figure. This demonstrated DMAB generation, but it could be seen from the spectrum that no intermediate was produced. As reaction time increased, the DMAB peak increased and the 4NBT peak decreased. Among them, the Raman peak appearing at a 1434 cm −1 was selected as symbolic of the growth kinetics of the reaction product because the vibration mode of such a peak was found to be a symmetric azo bond in the DMAB spectrum [47]. The authors could calculate the yield and average kinetic energy of the 4NBT-to-DMAB reduction reactions. Here, the authors estimated plasmonic-field enhancement by using SERS enhancement factors (SERS EFs) [48,49]. With the increase in radiation time, the Raman peak at 1338 cm −1 was significantly reduced, while the Raman peak at 1433 cm −1 increased, which demonstrated surface catalytic reactions. This demonstrated DMAB generation, but it could be seen from the spectrum that no intermediate was produced. As reaction time increased, the DMAB peak increased and the 4NBT peak decreased. Among them, the Raman peak appearing at a 1434 cm −1 was selected as symbolic of the growth kinetics of the reaction product because the vibration mode of such a peak was found to be a symmetric azo bond in the DMAB spectrum [47]. The authors could calculate the yield and average kinetic energy of the 4NBT-to-DMAB reduction reactions.
Here, the authors estimated plasmonic-field enhancement by using SERS enhancement factors (SERS EFs) [48,49]. With the increase in radiation time, the Raman peak at 1338 cm −1 was significantly reduced, while the Raman peak at 1433 cm −1 increased, which demonstrated surface catalytic reactions. Figure 7. Time-resolved SERS measurements during the plasmon-driven conversion of 4NBT to DMAB. The reactant peak at 1338 cm −1 decays during SERS measurement, and the product peak at 1434 cm −1 grows during SERS measurement [45]. Figure 8 displays the variation in Raman peak amplitude during growth and decay, and plots the SERS EF function. It can be seen from the figure that the amplitude of the Raman peak during the growth process was positive, and the amplitude of the Raman peak corresponding to the attenuation process was negative. Figure 8 displays an amplitude plot of the Raman peaks of the reactants and products as a function of SERS EF. Studies showed that the change in peak amplitude of reactants and products was related to SERS EF. The Raman signal amplitude of the reactants and products increased with the increase of SERS EF when the molecule was bound to the Au surface. The reactant peak at 1338 cm −1 decays during SERS measurement, and the product peak at 1434 cm −1 grows during SERS measurement [45].
Catalysts 2019, 9,193 7 of 13 Figure 8 displays the variation in Raman peak amplitude during growth and decay, and plots the SERS EF function. It can be seen from the figure that the amplitude of the Raman peak during the growth process was positive, and the amplitude of the Raman peak corresponding to the attenuation process was negative. Figure 8 displays an amplitude plot of the Raman peaks of the reactants and products as a function of SERS EF. Studies showed that the change in peak amplitude of reactants and products was related to SERS EF. The Raman signal amplitude of the reactants and products increased with the increase of SERS EF when the molecule was bound to the Au surface. In order to further investigate the difference in reactant reduction and product increase in plasmon excitation reactions, reaction conversion efficiency and yield are proposed here. The reaction yield of the system is shown in Figure 9a, defining the ratio of the ending Raman amplitude of a product to a reactant. In fact, this was the percentage of the number of remaining 4NBT molecules on the surface when reactions were finished. There was no effect on the conversion efficiency of the SERS EF function. In this section, conversion efficiency is defined as the quotient of total product growth to total reactant reduction, where increase or decrease is expressed by the amplitude of the corresponding Raman peak. In contrast to the end-reaction yield, conversion efficiency concentrated on how intensely the reactant signal was lost, rather than recording the end amplitude. It can be observed from Figure 9b that, as the SERS EF increased, conversion efficiency gradually decreased. When the intensity of SERS EF was less than 10 7 , conversion efficiency was between 20% and 100%; when the electric field was enhanced, conversion efficiency was generally low. Figure 9b displays that, when the intensity of the SERS EF was small, for example, less than 10 7 , the conversion rate dropped significantly. In order to further investigate the difference in reactant reduction and product increase in plasmon excitation reactions, reaction conversion efficiency and yield are proposed here. The reaction yield of the system is shown in Figure 9a, defining the ratio of the ending Raman amplitude of a product to a reactant. In fact, this was the percentage of the number of remaining 4NBT molecules on the surface when reactions were finished. There was no effect on the conversion efficiency of the SERS EF function. In this section, conversion efficiency is defined as the quotient of total product growth to total reactant reduction, where increase or decrease is expressed by the amplitude of the corresponding Raman peak. In contrast to the end-reaction yield, conversion efficiency concentrated on how intensely the reactant signal was lost, rather than recording the end amplitude. It can be observed from Figure 9b that, as the SERS EF increased, conversion efficiency gradually decreased. When the intensity of SERS EF was less than 10 7 , conversion efficiency was between 20% and 100%; when the electric field was enhanced, conversion efficiency was generally low. Figure 9b displays that, when the intensity of the SERS EF was small, for example, less than 10 7 , the conversion rate dropped significantly. (a) Final reaction yield, which is the ratio between product final amplitudes and reactant amplitudes of photoreactions and dependence on SERS EF. As localized field enhancement increased, the reaction yield stayed between 10% and 40%; (b) dependence of conversion efficiency, defined as the ratio between the amplitude changes of the product and reactant amplitudes on the SERS EF. As field enhancement increased, the reactant peak (1338 cm −1 ) decayed more significantly than the product peak formed (1434 cm −1 ) [45].
Since the ability of the AuFON substrate was significantly improved, a large amount of the product could quickly be collected at the beginning; thus, the authors focused on average reaction kinetics. Figure 10 displays three independent kinetic measurements of the plasmon-induced reactions of 4NBT to DMAB, with different local field enhancements. Comparing Figure 10a-c, it can be seen that the resulting kinetics vary extensively in different areas of the substrate. Furthermore, in Figure 10a,b, product growth increased significantly within 10 s before the reactions, as indicated by the broken green line. In Figure 10c, we can see that the product was produced at a slower rate. It is, therefore, concluded that there was significant loss of reactant signal during product formation. Figure 9. (a) Final reaction yield, which is the ratio between product final amplitudes and reactant amplitudes of photoreactions and dependence on SERS EF. As localized field enhancement increased, the reaction yield stayed between 10% and 40%; (b) dependence of conversion efficiency, defined as the ratio between the amplitude changes of the product and reactant amplitudes on the SERS EF. As field enhancement increased, the reactant peak (1338 cm −1 ) decayed more significantly than the product peak formed (1434 cm −1 ) [45].
Since the ability of the AuFON substrate was significantly improved, a large amount of the product could quickly be collected at the beginning; thus, the authors focused on average reaction kinetics. Figure 10 displays three independent kinetic measurements of the plasmon-induced reactions of 4NBT to DMAB, with different local field enhancements. Comparing Figure 10a-c, it can be seen that the resulting kinetics vary extensively in different areas of the substrate. Furthermore, in Figure 10a,b, product growth increased significantly within 10 s before the reactions, as indicated by the broken green line. In Figure 10c, we can see that the product was produced at a slower rate. It is, therefore, concluded that there was significant loss of reactant signal during product formation. From Figure 10a,b, it can be found that 4NBT amplitude gradually decreased, and a strange phenomenon occurred after reactions proceeded for approximately 30 s. The 4NBT amplitude quickly decreased, but the DMAB amplitude was substantially unchanged. As demonstrated in Figure 10b, the authors detected minor decrease in the signal of DMAB amplitude, indicating a similar degradation-reaction process. However, it can be seen in Figure 10c that 4NBT signal amplitude did not significantly decrease, and exhibited a lower mean field enhancement. In this region, the rate of 4NBT reduction was very slow and consistent with DMAB product-formation kinetics. Figure 11a displays the relationship between the photoreaction rate constant and the field enhancement. This was achieved by measuring product increase and reactant reduction. In general, the rate constant for reactant loss was generally higher compared to the rate constant of product increase, although the two constants were independent of the SERS EF. Thus, the rate-limiting stage From Figure 10a,b, it can be found that 4NBT amplitude gradually decreased, and a strange phenomenon occurred after reactions proceeded for approximately 30 s. The 4NBT amplitude quickly decreased, but the DMAB amplitude was substantially unchanged. As demonstrated in Figure 10b, the authors detected minor decrease in the signal of DMAB amplitude, indicating a similar degradation-reaction process. However, it can be seen in Figure 10c that 4NBT signal amplitude did not significantly decrease, and exhibited a lower mean field enhancement. In this region, the rate of 4NBT reduction was very slow and consistent with DMAB product-formation kinetics. Figure 11a displays the relationship between the photoreaction rate constant and the field enhancement. This was achieved by measuring product increase and reactant reduction. In general, the rate constant for reactant loss was generally higher compared to the rate constant of product increase, although the two constants were independent of the SERS EF. Thus, the rate-limiting stage of the photoconversion of the 4NBT molecule to DMAB reduction was independent of plasmon-field enhancement. In addition, the hydration layer was the root cause of the difference in photoreaction rate constants of the reactants and product. Studies showed that, in order for the reaction to better proceed, the nitro 4NBT group should be reduced, and protonation is needed to produce reaction intermediates [50][51][52][53][54]. In addition, the protons that came from the hydration layer on the Au surface were needed to limit the photoreaction rate [35][36][37][38][39]. Figure 11b displays the relationship between the rate constant of 4NBT degradation and photoreactions and field enhancement. Similarly, there was no significant relationship between field enhancement and rate constant for the scope of observed SERS EFs. Studies showed that, for other detection areas, the photoreaction rate constant was significantly higher than the degradation rate constant. This indicated that the reaction process was generally much quicker than degradation, which resulted in loss of light due to prolonged light exposure.
Catalysts 2019, x, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 14 of the photoconversion of the 4NBT molecule to DMAB reduction was independent of plasmon-field enhancement. In addition, the hydration layer was the root cause of the difference in photoreaction rate constants of the reactants and product. Studies showed that, in order for the reaction to better proceed, the nitro 4NBT group should be reduced, and protonation is needed to produce reaction intermediates [50][51][52][53][54]. In addition, the protons that came from the hydration layer on the Au surface were needed to limit the photoreaction rate [35][36][37][38][39]. Figure 11b displays the relationship between the rate constant of 4NBT degradation and photoreactions and field enhancement. Similarly, there was no significant relationship between field enhancement and rate constant for the scope of observed SERS EFs. Studies showed that, for other detection areas, the photoreaction rate constant was significantly higher than the degradation rate constant. This indicated that the reaction process was generally much quicker than degradation, which resulted in loss of light due to prolonged light exposure.  Figure 11. Rate constants for plasmon-induced processes. (a) Comparison of photoreaction rate constants with the loss of the 4NBT reactant (red), and formation of the DMAB product (green); (b) comparison of the photoreaction rate for 4NBT (red) and the photodegradation rate of 4NBT (blue). All observed ensemble-averaged rates are independent of field enhancement for the range of probed EFs [45].

Conclusions
In this review, we described plasmon catalyzed applications, such as plasmon-driven dissociations of hydrogen, nitrogen, water, and carbon dioxide. Photoreaction and degradation processes dominated under different environmental conditions. Therefore, in order to improve the rate of plasmon-driven processes for different chemical reactions, we should carefully consider a variety of photoinduced correlation rates.
In this work, we briefly introduced two ways to synthesize DMAB, and studied the photosynthetic reduction reaction and degradation process of 4NBT to DMAB, as well as the competitive relationship between reaction and degradation pathways. Note that the rate constant during competition is important because the degradation effect is usually more pronounced in a high field-enhancement region. The photosynthetic reaction was faster than the degradation process. However, in all regions, reactants were continuously reduced due to the progress of the degradation reaction, so a method of optimizing the process is to cause the photosynthetic reaction to occur before the degradation reaction, which effectively avoids the above problems.

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.