Tris-(Nitrilotriacetic Acid)-Decorated Polymer Conjugates as Tools for Immobilization and Visualization of His-Tagged Proteins

: Recombinant proteins are commonly expressed with artiﬁcial a ﬃ nity tags for puriﬁcation, immobilization and characterization. The most frequently used tag, His-tag, is a sequence of consecutive histidine residues fused to the protein of interest. Specialized small molecules that bind His-tag are primarily used for puriﬁcation, while antibodies are used for protein analysis. However, various issues may be encountered with the use of antibodies. Low inherent stability, the di ﬃ culty of introducing chemical modiﬁcations, and often-unreliable batch-to-batch consistency are among the limiting factors that call for better alternatives. Recently described polymer conjugates of N -(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide and low-molecular-weight functional ligands, so-called iBodies, are antibody mimetics capable of replacing antibodies in biochemical applications. We tailored this system for methods utilizing His-tag by accessorizing the polymer carrier with tris-nitrilotriacetic acid targeting ligands. These anti-polyHis iBodies are additionally accessorized with ﬂuorophores, enabling detection, and biotin ligands, enabling immobilization. Here, we characterized anti-polyHis iBodies and explored their use as antibody mimetics. We tested their stability, as well as the inﬂuence of di ﬀ erent metal mediators and His-tag lengths on binding. With high a ﬃ nity and stability, iBodies represent a new alternative for immobilization and visualization of His-tagged proteins. (cid:48) (Rev, T m = 59 ◦ C) including Nde I and Xho I restriction sites. To obtain the pET-15b vector coding for 6 × His-tagged SUMO1 protein, the ampliﬁed PCR product was cleaved with Xho I and Nde I and ligated into pET-15b via corresponding restriction sites. Next, the newly cloned pET-15b-6 × HisSUMO1 plasmid served as a template for PCR ampliﬁcation of the 10 × His-tagged SUMO1 protein coding sequence the using primers 5 (cid:48) -taccatgggcagcagccatcatcatcatcatcatcatcatcatcacagca-3 (cid:48) (Fwd, T m = 89.8 ◦ C) and 5 (cid:48) -atctcgagctaaccccccgtttgttcctgataaacttcaatcacatcttc-3 (cid:48) (Rev, T m = 83.0 ◦ C) including Nco I and Xho I restriction sites. The obtained PCR product was cleaved and ligated into pET-15b via Nco I and Xho I restriction sites, yielding pET-15b-10 × HisSUMO1 vector. To verify the sequences of the obtained plasmids, control digestion reactions and Sanger sequencing were performed.


Introduction
Artificial fusion tags introduced to proteins by recombinant DNA technologies have greatly facilitated methods for selective protein purification, characterization and immobilization.
A wide variety of affinity tags are available, among which the so-called His-tag is the most commonly used. This sequence of six to ten consecutive histidine residues (rarely occurring in nature) fused to the N-or C-terminus of recombinant proteins can be used to specifically target the protein of

Preparation and Characterization of Anti-polyHis iBody Conjugates
To obtain well-defined antibody mimetics, controlled reversible addition−fragmentation chain-transfer polymerization technique was used for synthesis of iBodies. This technique allows precise control of molecular weight, keeping the dispersity of the polymer precursor at around 1.2. Molecular weight of the polymer precursors was set to approximately 70 kg/mol after optimization in previous studies. Such length of polymer allows sufficient incorporation of comonomers with reactive groups, which corresponds to 50 reactive groups per polymer chain on average. We prepared two versions of anti-polyHis iBodies ( Figure 1) differing in the conjugated fluorescent probe to provide distinct means of detection. iBody 1 was designed with the fluorophore Cyanine 7.5 (excitation maximum = 788 nm, emission maximum = 808 nm) for detection within the near infrared (NIR) region of the light spectrum. For iBody 2, ATTO488 (excitation maximum = 502 nm, emission maximum = 523 nm) was chosen as a more conventional means of detection. As a negative control, we prepared a polymer conjugate accessorized with ATTO488 and biotin ligands but lacking the targeting tris-NTA molecules (iBody 3). For conjugation of functional ligands 74% or 48%, respectively, of reactive groups were used in the case of iBody 1 or iBody 2, respectively. Remaining reactive groups were depleted with 1-aminopropan-2-ol.
We characterized the iBodies by determining weight-average molecular weights (M w ), number-average molecular weights (M n ), and dispersity (Ð) of the polymer precursors and conjugates, and by assessing the content of individual conjugated ligands. M w' was calculated as M w of the precursor increased by the sum of apparent molecular weights of all conjugated ligands. M w' was used to calculate concentrations in all the experiments. The content of fluorescent probes in the conjugates was determined spectrophotometrically (ATTO488 ε502 nm = 90,000 L.mol −1 ·cm −1 in water; Cy7.5 ε788 nm = 223,000 L.mol −1 ·cm −1 in water), and the content of biotin was assessed colorimetrically. The amount of conjugated tris-NTA was determined by amino acid analysis ( Table 1). Yields of the iBodies 1-3 were 14 mg, 14 mg, and 40 mg, respectively.
To enable complexation of polyhistidine sequences, the tris-NTA targeting ligands must be charged with metal cations (Figure 2). To do so, iBodies 1 and 2 were incubated with either CoCl 2 or NiCl 2 to charge the NTA groups with Co 2+ or Ni 2+ , respectively. The concentrations of the charged anti-polyHis iBodies were experimentally determined with amino acid analysis to ensure precise comparison of binding properties. which corresponds to 50 reactive groups per polymer chain on average. We prepared two versions of anti-polyHis iBodies ( Figure 1) differing in the conjugated fluorescent probe to provide distinct means of detection. iBody 1 was designed with the fluorophore Cyanine 7.5 (excitation maximum = 788 nm, emission maximum = 808 nm) for detection within the near infrared (NIR) region of the light spectrum. For iBody 2, ATTO488 (excitation maximum = 502 nm, emission maximum = 523 nm) was chosen as a more conventional means of detection. As a negative control, we prepared a polymer conjugate accessorized with ATTO488 and biotin ligands but lacking the targeting tris-NTA molecules (iBody 3). For conjugation of functional ligands 74% or 48%, respectively, of reactive groups were used in the case of iBody 1 or iBody 2, respectively. Remaining reactive groups were depleted with 1-aminopropan-2-ol. We characterized the iBodies by determining weight-average molecular weights (Mw), numberaverage molecular weights (Mn), and dispersity (Ð) of the polymer precursors and conjugates, and by assessing the content of individual conjugated ligands. Mw' was calculated as Mw of the precursor increased by the sum of apparent molecular weights of all conjugated ligands. Mw' was used to calculate concentrations in all the experiments. The content of fluorescent probes in the conjugates was determined spectrophotometrically (ATTO488 ε502 nm = 90,000 L.mol −1 .cm −1 in water; Cy7.5 ε788 nm = 223,000 L.mol −1 .cm −1 in water), and the content of biotin was assessed colorimetrically. The amount of conjugated tris-NTA was determined by amino acid analysis ( Table 1). Yields of the iBodies 1-3 were 14 mg, 14 mg, and 40 mg, respectively.   To enable complexation of polyhistidine sequences, the tris-NTA targeting ligands must be charged with metal cations (Figure 2). To do so, iBodies 1 and 2 were incubated with either CoCl2 or NiCl2 to charge the NTA groups with Co 2+ or Ni 2+ , respectively. The concentrations of the charged anti-polyHis iBodies were experimentally determined with amino acid analysis to ensure precise comparison of binding properties. Illustration of Co 2+ -mediated interaction between histidines and a nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) moiety. The tris-NTA functional group, which shows higher affinity to His-tag due to the multivalency of NTA [11], is used as a targeting ligand in iBodies.

Choice and Establishment of SUMO1 Proteins as a Model System
To obtain a reliable system of target proteins for use in evaluating the anti-polyHis iBodies, we prepared N-terminally hexa-and deca-His-tagged SUMO1 ubiquitin-like proteins (Mw = 12 kDa). We chose this protein primarily because of its high stability, high production yields, and the simplicity of in vitro experiments.
The recombinant SUMO1 variants were heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli and purified on nickel-NTA resin (see Supplementary Materials, Table S1 and Figure S1). The proteins showed a high level of purity on SDS-PAGE. Concentrations of both proteins were determined by amino acid analysis. Total yields of 9.1 mg 6×His SUMO1 and 13.8 mg 10×His SUMO1 per 0.5 L of culture media were obtained. Illustration of Co 2+ -mediated interaction between histidines and a nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) moiety. The tris-NTA functional group, which shows higher affinity to His-tag due to the multivalency of NTA [11], is used as a targeting ligand in iBodies.

Choice and Establishment of SUMO1 Proteins as a Model System
To obtain a reliable system of target proteins for use in evaluating the anti-polyHis iBodies, we prepared N-terminally hexa-and deca-His-tagged SUMO1 ubiquitin-like proteins (Mw = 12 kDa). We chose this protein primarily because of its high stability, high production yields, and the simplicity of in vitro experiments.
The recombinant SUMO1 variants were heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli and purified on nickel-NTA resin (see Supplementary Materials, Table S1 and Figure S1). The proteins showed a high level of purity on SDS-PAGE. Concentrations of both proteins were determined by amino acid analysis. Total yields of 9.1 mg 6×His SUMO1 and 13.8 mg 10×His SUMO1 per 0.5 L of culture media were obtained.

Determination of Binding Constants of iBodies
Simple sandwich ELISA was performed to measure the binding constants of iBodies to His-tag and evaluate the differences in strength of cobalt-or nickel-mediated interactions with 6×His and 10×His fusion tags. iBody 1 and iBody 2 charged with either Co 2+ or Ni 2+ cations were bound to immobilized 6×His-and 10×His-tagged SUMO1 proteins. Neutravidin-horseradish peroxidase (Neu-HRP) was bound via the biotin anchor of the iBodies and used for luminescent detection. The binding constants are summarized in Table 2; for additional details, see Table S2 and Figure S2 in the Supplementary Materials. All measured K D values were in the nanomolar range. We observed a clear difference in the binding of differently prepared conjugates, sharing the same trends. As expected, based on the literature [3], the interactions of cobalt-charged iBodies with polyhistidine sequences show higher affinities than those mediated by nickel. Furthermore, anti-polyHis iBodies exhibited higher affinity for hexa-His-tagged proteins than for deca-His-tagged proteins. We hypothesize that this might be due to the steric hindrance of the longer tag with the protein. On the other hand, we also used the anti-polyHis iBodies for immobilization of various proteins of much larger sizes than 12 kDa (e.g., immunoreceptors, insulin receptors) and have not observed any differences in binding due to larger sizes of the protein (data not shown).
The K D values for iBody 2 suggest higher affinities in comparison to iBody 1. This is likely caused by the higher number of conjugated tris-NTA ligands (see Table 1), a general avidity trend that we have observed with iBodies. Higher nonspecific binding, most likely due to the nature of the Cyanine 7.5 fluorophore, was observed for iBody 1 (not shown here, see Figure S2 in the Supplementary Materials).

Stability Testing
To test the stability of the anti-polyHis iBodies, Co 2+ -charged iBody 1 was incubated at 37 • C in the dark for 24 months. The solution evaporated during this period, and thus the iBodies had to be redissolved in H 2 O. Remarkably, the performance of the anti-polyHis iBodies, which were stored at unfavorable conditions, is comparable to the regularly stored iBodies (−20 • C) as evidenced by results from Western blotting and immunoprecipitation assays.

Immobilization of Proteins and Isolation from Cell Lysate
iBody 1 and iBody 2 charged with cobalt or nickel cations, along with iBody 3 (negative control), were immobilized on prewashed streptavidin agarose beads via their biotin ligands. Additionally, iBody 1/Co 2+ used for stability testing at 37 • C (see above) was included in the experiment. Commercially available anti-His mAb was immobilized on protein-G sepharose beads via the Fc domain and tested alongside for comparison. To assess the ability of the iBodies to isolate His-tagged proteins from a complex mixture, a eukaryotic cell lysate containing 6×His-or 10×His-SUMO1 was used for pull-down experiments. The immunoprecipitated proteins were eluted from the beads by incubation in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) buffer at high temperature. The elution fractions were then resolved on SDS-PAGE and stained using the classical silver staining procedure.
All anti-polyHis iBodies tested were able to isolate His-tagged proteins from the cell lysate ( Figure 3). Corresponding to the binding constants measured by ELISA, iBodies exhibited stronger affinity to 6×His-tagged proteins than 10×His-tagged ones. However, unlike the mAb, the iBodies were able to pull down 10×His-tagged SUMO1, although in low amounts. Interestingly, the different K D values of the same iBody charged with different metal cations did not seem to have an effect on the binding of 6×His SUMO1. For 10×His SUMO1, the observed binding with respect to amounts of isolated protein exhibited the opposite trend as observed in other experiments (Ni 2+ -charged iBodies seem to be more effective). We propose that the presence of free metals and reduction agents (such as glutathione) in the cell lysate may influence the formation and stability of the tris-NTA/metal/His-tag complex.
as glutathione) in the cell lysate may influence the formation and stability of the tris-NTA/metal/Histag complex.
In comparison to the mAb, the polymer conjugates exhibited a higher background, which is partially caused by the use of streptavidin agarose beads. However, iBodies appear to be superior to the used commercial mAbs with respect to the amounts of the immunoprecipitated protein. Results of the repeated isolation of His-tagged SUMO1 show the reproducibility of the results (Supplementary Figure S3).

Visualization of His-Tagged Proteins on Western Blot
Detection of recombinant proteins on Western blot (WB) is an indispensable part of the protein purification process. To assess the ability of anti-polyHis iBodies to detect His-tagged proteins on WB, two different amounts of 6×His SUMO1 and 10×His SUMO1 were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and incubated with the corresponding 4 nM iBody solutions. All four iBodies (iBody 1 and 2 charged with cobalt or nickel cations), along with iBody 1/Co 2+ /37 °C from stability testing, were evaluated. mAb-CF770, a conjugate of anti-His-tag antibody and a near-IR fluorophore, was used for comparison. As shown in the Figure 4, all iBodies detected the His-tagged SUMO1 proteins. Detection with iBody 1 was in general more effective than with iBody 2. The signal intensities achieved with commercially available mAb-fluorophore conjugate are superior but still comparable to the detection with the most favorable iBodies. Remarkably, iBody 1/Co 2+ was able to detect the proteins even after 24 months of storage at 37 °C. For the quantification of relative Western blot signals, see Figure S4 and Table S3 in the Supplementary Materials. In contrast to the routinely used WB procedure, which commonly employs primary and secondary antibodies, iBodies can detect proteins on WB in a one-step procedure with significantly shorter incubation times of roughly 20 min. In comparison to the mAb, the polymer conjugates exhibited a higher background, which is partially caused by the use of streptavidin agarose beads. However, iBodies appear to be superior to the used commercial mAbs with respect to the amounts of the immunoprecipitated protein. Results of the repeated isolation of His-tagged SUMO1 show the reproducibility of the results (Supplementary Figure S3).

Visualization of His-Tagged Proteins on Western Blot
Detection of recombinant proteins on Western blot (WB) is an indispensable part of the protein purification process. To assess the ability of anti-polyHis iBodies to detect His-tagged proteins on WB, two different amounts of 6×His SUMO1 and 10×His SUMO1 were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and incubated with the corresponding 4 nM iBody solutions. All four iBodies (iBody 1 and 2 charged with cobalt or nickel cations), along with iBody 1/Co 2+ /37 • C from stability testing, were evaluated. mAb-CF770, a conjugate of anti-His-tag antibody and a near-IR fluorophore, was used for comparison. As shown in the Figure 4, all iBodies detected the His-tagged SUMO1 proteins. Detection with iBody 1 was in general more effective than with iBody 2. The signal intensities achieved with commercially available mAb-fluorophore conjugate are superior but still comparable to the detection with the most favorable iBodies. Remarkably, iBody 1/Co 2+ was able to detect the proteins even after 24 months of storage at 37 • C. For the quantification of relative Western blot signals, see Figure S4 and Table S3 in the Supplementary Materials. In contrast to the routinely used WB procedure, which commonly employs primary and secondary antibodies, iBodies can detect proteins on WB in a one-step procedure with significantly shorter incubation times of roughly 20 min.

General Procedures
Detailed experimental procedures for the synthesis of the HPMA copolymer precursor and the tris-NTA ligands, as well as the process of ligand conjugation, have been described previously [1]. Generally, the anti-polyHis polymer conjugates iBody 1 and 2 were prepared by reaction of the copolymer precursor poly(HPMA-co-Ma-ß-Ala-TT) containing thiazolidine-2-thione reactive groups (TT) along the polymer chain with a mixture of fluorophore molecules (fluorophore-NH 2 ), affinity anchors (biotin-NH 2 ), and targeting ligands (NH 2 -tris-NTA) in a desired ratio.

Charging Tris-NTA with Metal Cations
Lyophilized anti-polyHis iBody 1 and iBody 2 were weighed and dissolved in 10 mM CoCl 2 or NiCl 2 . Samples were incubated on a rotator at room temperature for 1 h. The solutions were then transferred into dialysis chambers (10 kDa cutoff) and allowed to equilibrate in 5 L of water at 4 • C for 36 h with multiple (6×) exchanges of water. After dialysis, the concentrations of the charged anti-polyHis iBodies in solution were experimentally determined by amino acid analysis.

Determination of the Composition and Molecular Weight of iBodies
The weight-average molecular weights (M w ), number-average molecular weights (M n ), and dispersity (Ð) of the polymer precursor and conjugates were determined using a HPLC (Shimadzu, Japan) system equipped with a UV-DAD detector, an Optilab ® NEO differential refractometer, Viscostar III and DAWN-Heleos II multi-angle light scattering (all from Wyatt Technology, USA) detector and a size-exclusion chromatography on a Superose 6 column. The M w , M n and Đ were calculated using Astra 7 software. The refractive index increment dn/dc = 0.167 mL/g was used for calculation. These experiments were conducted with 0.3 M sodium acetate, pH 6.5, buffer at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min.
The content of tris-NTA in iBodies 1 and 2 was determined by amino acid analysis of the hydrolyzed polymer conjugates (6 M HCl, 115 • C, 18 h in a sealed vial). A reversed-phase column (Chromolith ® HighResolution RP-18e, 100 × 4.6 mm) (Merck, Germany), following pre-column derivatization with 2,3-naphthalenedicarboxaldehyde (NDA)/NaCN (source of cyanide ions), and a fluorescence detector (excitation at 229 nm, emission at 490 nm) were used for the analysis. Gradient elution with 10%-100% solvent B (300 mL of 0.17 M sodium acetate and 700 mL of methanol) was performed for 35 min at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Solvent A was 0.05 M sodium acetate buffer, pH 6.5.

Plasmid Preparation and Cloning
We selected the pET-15b expression plasmid, which encodes a 6×His-tag, for production of recombinant SUMO1 proteins with 6×His and 10×His fusion tags. We used as a template the pHisTEV30a-SUMO1 plasmid encoding the protein of interest (along with a Tobacco Etch Viru (TEV) protease cleavage site and 10×His cleavage) prepared in-house.
First, the protein coding sequence was amplified from pHisTEV30a-SUMO1 using Taq polymerase and primers 5 -aaacatatgtctgaccaggag-3 (Fwd, T m = 57 • C) and 5 -aaactcgagctaaccccc-3 (Rev, T m = 59 • C) including NdeI and XhoI restriction sites. To obtain the pET-15b vector coding for 6×His-tagged SUMO1 protein, the amplified PCR product was cleaved with XhoI and NdeI and ligated into pET-15b via corresponding restriction sites. Next, the newly cloned pET-15b-6×HisSUMO1 plasmid served as a template for PCR amplification of the 10×His-tagged SUMO1 protein coding sequence the using primers 5 -taccatgggcagcagccatcatcatcatcatcatcatcatcatcacagca-3 (Fwd, T m = 89.8 • C) and 5 -atctcgagctaaccccccgtttgttcctgataaacttcaatcacatcttc-3 (Rev, T m = 83.0 • C) including NcoI and XhoI restriction sites. The obtained PCR product was cleaved and ligated into pET-15b via NcoI and XhoI restriction sites, yielding pET-15b-10×HisSUMO1 vector. To verify the sequences of the obtained plasmids, control digestion reactions and Sanger sequencing were performed.

Expression of Recombinant SUMO Proteins
Recombinant SUMO1 proteins with N-terminally fused polyhistidine affinity tags of different lengths were expressed in E. coli. BL21-DE3-RIL competent cells were first transformed with the two prepared plasmids, pET-15b-6×HisSUMO1 and pET-15b-10×HisSUMO1, then plated on LB agar containing ampicillin (100 µg/µL) and allowed to grow at RT for 48 h. A single colony was picked from each plate and separately transferred into liquid media containing ampicillin (8 mL LB, 100 µg/mL ampicillin). After allowing the transformed bacterial cells to grow at 37 • C on a shaker for 12 h, each of the pre-grown cultures was used to inoculate 500 mL of LB media. The cultures were allowed to grow at 16 • C on a shaker. After cultures reached an OD 600 of 0.6, protein expression was induced by addition of 0.4 mM Isopropyl ß-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)and allowed to progress overnight. Afterwards, both samples were centrifuged, and the pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)). Protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Aldrich, Czech Republic) was added, and the samples were homogenized with an Avestin EMULSIFLEX C3 instrument (ATA Scientific, Australia).

Purification of Recombinant His-SUMO Proteins
Cell lysates from expression cultures were collected and used for purification on nickel-NTA resin. Washed resin (0.5 mL) was added to each lysate, and the samples were allowed to incubate for 2 h at RT. The resin with bound proteins was washed three times (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole), and the proteins were eluted using buffer with a high concentration of imidazole (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole). Elution fractions containing the desired products were transferred into Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 50 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 137 mM NaCl) by dialysis. All fractions (flow-throughs and elutions) were collected during the procedure and used for analysis with silver-stained SDS-PAGE and Western blotting (Supplementary Materials, Figure S1, Table S1). Amino acid analysis was performed to determine the concentrations of both proteins with high precision.

Determining the Binding Constants of iBodies with ELISA
To measure the binding constants of iBodies to His-tag and evaluate the differences in strength of cobalt-or nickel-mediated interactions with 6×His and 10×His fusion tags, simple sandwich ELISA was performed in a 96-well, flat-bottom, MaxiSorp, nontransparent plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Czech Republic). SUMO1 protein (20 ng per well) was immobilized directly onto the plate (1 h, RT) and blocked with 1% BSA in TBS (4 • C, O/N). iBody 1 or iBody 2 were then bound to the protein in a concentration series (60 min, RT) (see details in Table S2). In the last layer of the sandwich, neutravidin-HRP was bound via biotin and used for detection. Between binding steps of each new species, wash steps were performed, i.e., 4×TBS with 0.1% Tween20 (TBST). Immediately after addition of the HRP substrate, luminescence at 428 nm was measured on a TECAN Infinite M1000 instrument (TECAN, Germany).

Immobilization on iBodies and
Isolation of His-SUMO1 Proteins from Cell Lysate iBody 1 (Ni 2+ or Co 2+ charged), iBody 1 (stability testing, Co 2+ charged), iBody 2 (Ni 2+ or Co 2+ charged), iBody 3 (negative control), and anti-His-tag mAb (Sigma Aldrich, Czech Republic) were immobilized on specialized beads and used for affinity pull-down of SUMO1 proteins. The iBodies were immobilized on streptavidin agarose Ultra Performance beads (Solulink, USA) via their biotin ligands. The mAb was immobilized on protein-G sepharose beads 4 fast flow (GE Healthcare, USA) via the Fc domain. Aliquots of 300 µL of each 150 nM species to be bound were incubated with 12 µL prewashed beads (TBS, 4 • C, O/N) for 90 min at RT. Eukaryotic cell lysate (total protein concentration~7 mg/mL) was 4x diluted in TBST and spiked with either 6×His SUMO1 or 10×His SUMO1 (final SUMO1 concentration of 20 ng/µL). Each immobilized species was then mixed with the spiked cell lysate (each sample containing 4 µg of SUMO1) and allowed to incubate (1.5 h, RT). Immunoprecipitated proteins were eluted from resins by incubation in 30 µL SDS buffer (10 min, 98 • C). Each of the samples from pull-down (12 µL) along with negative controls (iBody 3, blank streptavidin agarose beads and blank protein-G sepharose beads) and positive controls (spiked cell lysate and purified SUMO1) were separated on a 16% polyacrylamide gel (SDS-PAGE, 200 V, 70 min, 4 • C) and visualized by silver staining.

Conclusions
Our biomimetic polymeric conjugates offer a new approach to protein immobilization and detection. Here, we demonstrate that iBodies can be used as antibody mimetics to detect and bind His-tagged proteins in common biochemical applications. Furthermore, we demonstrate that iBodies are extremely stable and at least as effective as commonly used anti-His-tag antibodies. In contrast to antibodies, iBodies are effective even after two years of storage at high temperature. By replacing antibodies with polymer conjugates, routine procedures can be simplified and significantly shortened. Additionally, we are exploring further uses of anti-polyHis iBodies, including immobilization of whole proteins via their His-tag and applications for such conjugates.
Most importantly, the iBody platform is extremely flexible. The properties of the conjugates are highly dependent on the nature and number of functional ligands and thus can be adjusted depending on the intended use of iBodies. This work is focused on applications with His-tagged proteins, but, in theory, iBodies can be designed for visualization and immobilization of any protein with known ligands.

Supplementary Materials:
The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/9/12/1011/s1, Table S1: Overview of samples collected during purification of the 6×His-and 10×His-SUMO1 proteins and amounts loaded onto 16% polyacrylamide gels used for subsequent silver staining and WB analyses, Figure S1: (a) Analysis of His-SUMO1 protein purification process: results of silver staining, (b) Analysis of His-SUMO1 protein purification process: results of Western blotting, Table S2: Concentration series of iBodies used for KD determination with ELISA, Figure S2: (a) Graphical representation of binding of iBody 1/Co 2+ to His-tagged SUMO1 proteins measured with ELISA, (b) Graphical representation of binding of iBody 1/Ni 2+ to His-tagged SUMO1 proteins measured with ELISA, (c) Graphical representation of binding of iBody 2/Co 2+ to His-tagged SUMO1 proteins measured with ELISA, (d) Graphical representation of binding of iBody 2/Ni 2+ to His-tagged SUMO1 proteins measured with ELISA, Figure S3: (a) Repetition of the immunoprecipitation experiments/pull-down of 6×His-tagged SUMO1, (b) Repetition of the immunoprecipitation experiments/pull-down of 10×His-tagged SUMO1, Figure S4: Relative quantification of the Western blotting results, Table S3: Summary of the relative signals on Western blots.

Funding:
This research was funded by the European Regional Development Fund; OP RDE (No.CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000729), by the Ministry of Industry and Trade (Czech Republic), projects FV10490 and FV10370, by the Czech Science Foundation (No. 19-10280S), by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of CR within the National Sustainability Program II, Project BIOCEV-FAR LQ1604, by the project "BIOCEV-Biotechnology and Biomedicine Centre of the Academy of Sciences and Charles University" (CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109) and by the by Charles University Grant Agency (No. 1670119).