Review of Anodic Catalysts for SO 2 Depolarized Electrolysis for “Green Hydrogen” Production

: In the near future, primary energy from fossil fuels should be gradually replaced with renewable and clean energy sources. To succeed in this goal, hydrogen has proven to be a very suitable energy carrier, because it can be easily produced by water electrolysis using renewable energy sources. After storage, it can be fed to a fuel cell, again producing electricity. There are many ways to improve the efﬁciency of this process, some of them based on the combination of the electrolytic process with other non-electrochemical processes. One of the most promising is the thermochemical hybrid sulphur cycle (also known as Westinghouse cycle). This cycle combines a thermochemical step (H 2 SO 4 decomposition) with an electrochemical one, where the hydrogen is produced from the oxidation of SO 2 and H 2 O (SO 2 depolarization electrolysis, carried out at a considerably lower cell voltage compared to conventional electrolysis). This review summarizes the different catalysts that have been tested for the oxidation of SO 2 in the anode of the electrolysis cell. Their advantages and disadvantages, the effect of platinum (Pt) loading, and new tendencies in their use are presented. This is expected to shed light on future development of new catalysts for this interesting process.


Introduction
Nowadays, hydrogen is considered an actor with a significant role in tackling climate change and poor air quality. Hydrogen can, in particular, be produced from a broad range of renewable energy sources, acting as a unique energy core providing low or zero emission energy to all energy consuming sectors. Thus, Europe, through the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint and Undertaking (FCH-JU) assessed different "Green Hydrogen" pathways, which as of today have already become nearly commercial, have already undergone extensive research in past or ongoing programs in Europe, or are internationally providing evidence of their general promise for be ready for commercialization. Figure 1 shows the different processes for producing hydrogen from renewable energy sources, and the ones which were selected as more promising after a deeper evaluation [1].
On the way to a "hydrogen economy" [2] and "Green hydrogen", the ideal raw material is, obviously, water. However, the single step thermal dissociation of water to hydrogen and oxygen is one of the most challenging processes for producing hydrogen in practice [3], due to its unfavorable thermodynamics.
There are different routes to produce hydrogen with low or zero CO 2 emissions, including promising processes based on water splitting (in which new catalysts are being developed)photoelectrochemical water splitting [4][5][6], thermochemical cycles [3,7,8] or hybrid thermochemical cycles [9,10] are some examples. Hybrid thermochemical cycles using a high temperature thermal source have been proposed as one of the most promising technologies for massive hydrogen There are different routes to produce hydrogen with low or zero CO2 emissions, including promising processes based on water splitting (in which new catalysts are being developed)photoelectrochemical water splitting [4][5][6], thermochemical cycles [3,7,8] or hybrid thermochemical cycles [9,10] are some examples. Hybrid thermochemical cycles using a high temperature thermal source have been proposed as one of the most promising technologies for massive hydrogen production [11]; moreover, they have been included as one of the candidates for "Green hydrogen" production, as it can be seen in Figure 1.
One of the leading thermochemical cycles to produce hydrogen with a high sustainability is the hybrid Sulphur cycle, also known as the Westinghouse cycle. It is a hybrid electrochemicalthermochemical cycle [9]. It was originally proposed in 1975 [12] and developed by Westinghouse electric corporation. The process is labelled "hybrid" because of the substitution of one thermochemical reaction by the electrochemical oxidation of SO2 with water to yield sulphuric acid and hydrogen [3,13]. What makes this process interesting is its low theoretical cell potential of 0.158 V (versus SHE), which when compared with direct water electrolysis (E 0 = 1.23 V versus SHE) makes the Westinghouse process a great alternative in terms of electric energy consumption [3]. Figure 2 shows a possible configuration of the Westinghouse cycle. It consists of two main steps. In the first step, SO2 is electrochemically oxidized at the anode to form sulphuric acid, protons and electrons (E 0 = 0.158 V versus SHE). The protons are conducted across the electrolyte separator to the cathode, where they recombine with the electrons to form hydrogen, according to Equations (1) and (2) [3,[13][14][15][16]. SO2(aq) + 2H2O → H2SO4(aq) + 2H + + 2e − (1) 2H + + 2e − → H2(g) (2) The second step, common to all sulphur-based thermochemical cycles, is the result of two successive reactions. As sulphuric acid is vaporized (ca. 650 K) and superheated (ca. 900 K), it decomposes into water and sulphur trioxide. The following reaction is the catalytic decomposition, at temperatures higher than 1000 K, of the SO3 to produce oxygen and sulphur dioxide (Equations (3) and (4)) and downstream are separated [3,[13][14][15]. Different processes for hydrogen production assessed by the EU in terms of costs, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions One of the leading thermochemical cycles to produce hydrogen with a high sustainability is the hybrid Sulphur cycle, also known as the Westinghouse cycle. It is a hybrid electrochemicalthermochemical cycle [9]. It was originally proposed in 1975 [12] and developed by Westinghouse electric corporation. The process is labelled "hybrid" because of the substitution of one thermochemical reaction by the electrochemical oxidation of SO 2 with water to yield sulphuric acid and hydrogen [3,13]. What makes this process interesting is its low theoretical cell potential of 0.158 V (versus SHE), which when compared with direct water electrolysis (E 0 = 1.23 V versus SHE) makes the Westinghouse process a great alternative in terms of electric energy consumption [3]. Figure 2 shows a possible configuration of the Westinghouse cycle. It consists of two main steps. In the first step, SO 2 is electrochemically oxidized at the anode to form sulphuric acid, protons and electrons (E 0 = 0.158 V versus SHE). The protons are conducted across the electrolyte separator to the cathode, where they recombine with the electrons to form hydrogen, according to Equations (1) and (2) [3,[13][14][15][16].
The second step, common to all sulphur-based thermochemical cycles, is the result of two successive reactions. As sulphuric acid is vaporized (ca. 650 K) and superheated (ca. 900 K), it decomposes into water and sulphur trioxide. The following reaction is the catalytic decomposition, at temperatures higher than 1000 K, of the SO 3 to produce oxygen and sulphur dioxide (Equations (3) and (4)) and downstream are separated [3,[13][14][15].
SO3 → SO2 + 1/2O2 (4) The sulphuric acid decomposition has been widely investigated in different studies, such as the one from Sandia National Laboratories [11], and most efforts have been devoted to the optimization of the SO2 depolarized electrolysis (the electrochemical stage) to increase the global efficiency of the cycle [16]. Challenges for this process are the reduction of the overpotentials in the electrolysis step in order to improve the overall efficiency of the process-the development of high corrosion resistance materials due to the use of acid solutions. Also, as for the thermochemical step in which H2SO4 has to be decomposed at very high temperatures, only high-temperature energy sources suitable for this process, such as concentration solar energy or nuclear energy. In terms of efficiency and costs, an optimal efficiency is 47% for a nuclear heat source with a hydrogen cost of 4 $/kg [3].
The first design of the SO2 electrolyzer was developed by Westinghouse Corp. in the 1970s, and it consisted of a conventional electrolysis cell with two compartments separated by a membrane [17]. Modern electrolyzers for this process are based on proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) technology, where the membrane-electrode-assembly (MEA) is the core of the cell [18]. Figure 3 shows a scheme of a PEM electrolyzer for SO2 depolarized electrolysis.
As mentioned before, the electrolysis step is one of the parts that has to be optimized. One of the proposed goals for this step is to operate at 0.6 V and 0.5 A/cm 2 [19]; however, this has not been yet reached.
The anodic electrocatalysts are the key factor to improve SO2 electrolysis efficiency, as it is necessary to find catalysts with not only high activity but high stability and low costs. At the beginning, anodized electrodes with noble metals like Pt, Pd, Rh, Au, Ru, Re, or Ir were investigated, being the first to achieve better results [20,21]. Now the catalyst technology used in PEMFC systems has been copied, and the electrodes are based on a catalyst supported by carbon-based materials deposited on gas diffusion layers. The sulphuric acid decomposition has been widely investigated in different studies, such as the one from Sandia National Laboratories [11], and most efforts have been devoted to the optimization of the SO 2 depolarized electrolysis (the electrochemical stage) to increase the global efficiency of the cycle [16]. Challenges for this process are the reduction of the overpotentials in the electrolysis step in order to improve the overall efficiency of the process-the development of high corrosion resistance materials due to the use of acid solutions. Also, as for the thermochemical step in which H 2 SO 4 has to be decomposed at very high temperatures, only high-temperature energy sources suitable for this process, such as concentration solar energy or nuclear energy. In terms of efficiency and costs, an optimal efficiency is 47% for a nuclear heat source with a hydrogen cost of 4 $/kg [3].
The first design of the SO 2 electrolyzer was developed by Westinghouse Corp. in the 1970s, and it consisted of a conventional electrolysis cell with two compartments separated by a membrane [17]. Modern electrolyzers for this process are based on proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) technology, where the membrane-electrode-assembly (MEA) is the core of the cell [18]. Figure 3 shows a scheme of a PEM electrolyzer for SO 2 depolarized electrolysis.
As mentioned before, the electrolysis step is one of the parts that has to be optimized. One of the proposed goals for this step is to operate at 0.6 V and 0.5 A/cm 2 [19]; however, this has not been yet reached.
The anodic electrocatalysts are the key factor to improve SO 2 electrolysis efficiency, as it is necessary to find catalysts with not only high activity but high stability and low costs. At the beginning, anodized electrodes with noble metals like Pt, Pd, Rh, Au, Ru, Re, or Ir were investigated, being the first to achieve better results [20,21]. Now the catalyst technology used in PEMFC systems has been copied, and the electrodes are based on a catalyst supported by carbon-based materials deposited on gas diffusion layers. This manuscript aims to provide a review on recent developments in electrocatalysts for SO2 depolarization electrolysis. To the authors' knowledge, there is no review on this topic. In addition, taking into account the great impulse that renewable energies have in the world, and that the hydrogen produced with zero emission technologies can be one of the actors in the future energy scenario, this work can give an overview of the current status and future prospects of the catalysts for improving the electrochemical stage of the hybrid sulphur cycle.

Platinum-Based Catalysts
Platinum, as noble metal, is a well-known catalyst that has been widely used in fuel cells. It was one of the first studied catalysts for SO2 electrolysis to produce hydrogen, showing great catalytic performance for the electro-oxidation of SO2; however, its high price is a disadvantage for this material. For this reason, in recent years different materials have been examined and compared with this noble metal, in order to find a better option to be employed as catalyst.
Seo and Sawyer mention the necessity of pretreating the electrode to activate it, forming an oxide layer at high potentials, which is then stripped when negative potentials are applied to obtain the desired surface characteristics [22]. This paper also shows that the initial preconditioning of the electrode affects its performance. They recommend choosing an initial voltage of −0.15 V (versus Saturated Calomel Electrode, SCE). In a later study [23], the authors investigated the oxidation mechanism of SO2 on platinum electrodes, demonstrating that the process is mass-diffusion controlled and is an electrochemical-electrontrasfer process at potentials lower than those needed for platinum oxide formation (<0.42 V versus SCE). Whereas, a chemical reaction occurs between sulfite and anodically-formed oxide at higher potentials. The same result regarding the oxidation mechanism on platinized platinum supported on porous carbon electrodes was obtained by Wiesener [24]. Appleby and Pinchon compared the catalytic activity of pure black platinum with other noble metals supported on carbon materials, using a rotating-disk paste electrode at 3000 rpm [21]. They obtained 0.3 A/cm 2 with 10% Pt on Norit BRX at 0.7 V (versus SHE), which they considered a good result. Nevertheless, pure black platinum showed a better catalytic activity, with approximately 0.5 A/cm 2 at 0.7 V (versus SHE). Platinum supported on 2 μm graphite spheres showed poor activity, probably due to lower surface area, demonstrating that the SO2 oxidation is highly substrate-dependent. In this work, they suggest using an acid concentration of 50 wt % for optimal results. Lu and Ammon used 50 wt % H2SO4 at 25 °C and atmospheric pressure for SO2 electro-oxidation [20]. Pre-anodized electrodes showed reproducible data when being pre-treated, as mentioned before [22]. The authors obtained a limiting current density of only 1.2 mA/cm 2 at 0.8 V (versus SHE) for a platinum electrode. In a different study, Lu and Ammon compared the performance of a Pt-catalyzed carbon plate electrode with a carbon cloth-supported electrode in an SO2-depolarized electrolyzer [25]. They developed an electrolyzer with a loading of 7 mg/cm 2 of platinum on the anode and with a potential This manuscript aims to provide a review on recent developments in electrocatalysts for SO 2 depolarization electrolysis. To the authors' knowledge, there is no review on this topic. In addition, taking into account the great impulse that renewable energies have in the world, and that the hydrogen produced with zero emission technologies can be one of the actors in the future energy scenario, this work can give an overview of the current status and future prospects of the catalysts for improving the electrochemical stage of the hybrid sulphur cycle.

Platinum-Based Catalysts
Platinum, as noble metal, is a well-known catalyst that has been widely used in fuel cells. It was one of the first studied catalysts for SO 2 electrolysis to produce hydrogen, showing great catalytic performance for the electro-oxidation of SO 2 ; however, its high price is a disadvantage for this material. For this reason, in recent years different materials have been examined and compared with this noble metal, in order to find a better option to be employed as catalyst.
Seo and Sawyer mention the necessity of pretreating the electrode to activate it, forming an oxide layer at high potentials, which is then stripped when negative potentials are applied to obtain the desired surface characteristics [22]. This paper also shows that the initial preconditioning of the electrode affects its performance. They recommend choosing an initial voltage of −0.15 V (versus Saturated Calomel Electrode, SCE). In a later study [23], the authors investigated the oxidation mechanism of SO 2 on platinum electrodes, demonstrating that the process is mass-diffusion controlled and is an electrochemical-electrontrasfer process at potentials lower than those needed for platinum oxide formation (<0.42 V versus SCE). Whereas, a chemical reaction occurs between sulfite and anodically-formed oxide at higher potentials. The same result regarding the oxidation mechanism on platinized platinum supported on porous carbon electrodes was obtained by Wiesener [24]. Appleby and Pinchon compared the catalytic activity of pure black platinum with other noble metals supported on carbon materials, using a rotating-disk paste electrode at 3000 rpm [21]. They obtained 0.3 A/cm 2 with 10% Pt on Norit BRX at 0.7 V (versus SHE), which they considered a good result. Nevertheless, pure black platinum showed a better catalytic activity, with approximately 0.5 A/cm 2 at 0.7 V (versus SHE). Platinum supported on 2 µm graphite spheres showed poor activity, probably due to lower surface area, demonstrating that the SO 2 oxidation is highly substrate-dependent. In this work, they suggest using an acid concentration of 50 wt % for optimal results. Lu and Ammon used 50 wt % H 2 SO 4 at 25 • C and atmospheric pressure for SO 2 electro-oxidation [20]. Pre-anodized electrodes showed reproducible data when being pre-treated, as mentioned before [22]. The authors obtained a limiting current density of only 1.2 mA/cm 2 at 0.8 V (versus SHE) for a platinum electrode. In a different study, Lu and Ammon compared the performance of a Pt-catalyzed carbon plate electrode with a carbon cloth-supported electrode in an SO 2 -depolarized electrolyzer [25]. They developed an electrolyzer with a loading of 7 mg/cm 2 of platinum on the anode and with a potential of 0.77 V (versus SHE) at a current density of 0.2 A/cm 2 in a new electrolyzer configuration (50 wt % H 2 SO 4 ; 50 • C, atmospheric pressure). In a carried-out endurance test for 80 h at 0.1 A/cm 2 , the stabilized voltage was ca. 675 mV, obtaining a hydrogen purity of 98.7%.
Scott and Taama used a Pt/Ti electrode for the electrolysis of SO 2 for testing its current efficiency [26]. At a current density of 10 mA/cm 2 and 20 • C, the current efficiency was initially greater than 95% and it decreased with time as the concentration of sulphite fell, indicating that the oxidation of sulphite is almost entirely controlled by mass transfer. Recent works have generally involved high active surface area electrodes, where the catalyst is loaded on dispersed conductive carbon particles. Thus, Weidener et al. [27] prepared a membrane electrode assembly (MEA), spraying an ink containing 40 wt % Pt onto the gas diffusion layer until desired loading was achieved. They obtained a voltage of 0.7 V at 0.3 A/cm 2 for a catalyst loading of 1 mgPt/cm 2 and 0.83 V at 0.3 A/cm 2 , using the half Pt loading. Steimke and Steeper compared the performance of two different cells [28]. One of them had porous titanium as the electrode in both the anode and cathode, with platinum black as catalyst on the titanium surface, a loading of 4 mgPt/cm 2 , and a specific area for the catalyst of 25 m 2 /g. In the second cell, platinum was added to the Nafion membrane. The authors prepared a slurry consisting of 40 wt % platinum on carbon and Nafion solution, which was hot pressed onto the Nafion membrane used in the MEA configuration, the platinum loading for the anode and the cathode was 0.5 mgPt/cm 2 . For the second cell, the authors obtained the lowest cell voltages for the highest tested sulfur dioxide concentration and the highest anolyte flowrate. Later, the same authors [29] tested six different MEA configurations for the electrolysis of SO 2 . The best results were obtained for a Pt loading of 0.88 mgPt/cm 2 onto the anode side with 0.75 mV at 0.3 mA/cm 2 at 4 bar and 70 • C. For this study, the catalyst containing ink was sprayed on the shiny Teflon-coated side of each gas diffusion layer, until the required Pt loading was achieved. Colón-Mercado and Hobbs compared the catalyst activity of platinum supported on carbon and a pure platinum black electrode [30]. When the Pt was to be supported on carbon, an ink was prepared and placed onto the gas diffusion layer. They also studied the electrocatalytic activity of platinum at different temperatures and acid concentrations. Allen et al. [31] observed that the response of a platinum disk electrode was different depending on the lowest minimum potentials applied in a cyclic voltammetry. Three main oxidative peaks were obtained. The first peak appeared before the formation of platinum oxide which occurs at potentials above 0.90 V (SHE), meaning that peaks II and III were influenced by the formation of these compounds. When the initial voltage was lower than 0.2 V the oxidation scenario was defined to some extent by acid concentration. Furthermore, by increasing acid concentration, the reaction was inhibited.

Effect of Platinum Loading
At the beginning, the Pt loading in the tests performed by Westinghouse in the 1980s was as high as 10 g Pt/cm 2 . However, new electrode configurations allowed them to reduce the catalyst loading to 1 mgPt/cm 2 , with no penalty on cell performance [17].
Nowadays, as in the case of the PEMFC technology, the aim is to use the minimum Pt loading possible, in order to minimize the costs of the system. As a consequence, the effect of Pt loading has been studied by different research groups. Thus, the effect of Pt loading as a catalyst was studied by Lee et al. [32]. They used a three-electrode electrochemical cell with H 2 SO 4 as the electrolyte.
Five different Pt loadings were tested (0.40, 0.80, 1.30, 2.34 and 4.02 mg/cm 2 ) by cyclic voltammetry (CV) in a deaerated 4.8 wt % H 2 SO 4 solution. The current level of the CVs increased with an increase in the Pt loading amount over the whole potential range. Figure 4 shows the evolution of the current density for a value of voltage depending on the Pt loading.  [32]. Reprinted by permission of [24]. Copyright Elsevier Science BV. 2009. The catalyst electrochemical active surface area (ESA) was calculated with these data, and it was concluded that the ESA did not increase at the same level as the Pt loading increased. This means that utilization of Pt decreased with loading, due to higher inactive sites (interfaces between particles, support and binding material). A study of the effect of Pt loading on SO2 oxidation was carried out in an SO2-saturated 50 wt % H2SO4 solution. The limiting current density increased as the Pt loading increased. For a cell potential of 0.6 V, the apparent current density increased from 6.3 × 10 −3 to 1.4 × 10 −2 A/cm 2 with an increasing Pt loading amount from 0.4 to 4.0 mg/cm 2 . However, the current density remained almost constant at a high potential for the five studied catalyst loadings, indicating that the SO2 oxidation reaction is controlled by the diffusion of dissolved SO2 to the electrode in the high anodic over-potential range. Xue et al. [33] also carried out experiments with different Pt loadings in the range of 0.2-2.2 mg/cm 2 . The higher loading amount led to better electrolysis performances, as a result of more electrochemical reaction sites, peaking at 1 mg/cm 2 . Increasing the amount of platinum above that value led to worse performance, due to stacking of catalyst particles on one another. In addition, an excess of platinum increased the diffusion channel length and impeded the accessibility of the electro-active ion to the Pt surface [32,33]. For the authors' set-up, the optimal Pt loading was 1 mg/cm 2 in terms of platinum utilization, and polarization curves result. These authors also studied the influence of sulphuric acid concentration and temperature on the cell operating voltage, being the best electrolysis performance at 80 and 30 wt % sulphuric acid. Krüger et al. [34] evaluated some MEA manufacturing parameters, one of them being the catalyst loading. Their results are in concordance with studies carried out by previous authors [32,33]. Polarization curves obtained at 80 °C for catalyst loadings of 0.3, 0.5 and 1 mgPt/cm 2 showed that the best performance was for the catalyst loading of 1 mgPt/cm 2 . However, it should be noted that for the catalyst loadings of 0.3 and 0.5 mgPt/cm 2 , the platinum was supported on carbon, and for the highest catalyst loading platinum black was used.
Staser et al. [35] evaluated the effect of catalyst loading on the anodic overpotential suing a model and in the range of 0.001 to 1.5 mg Pt/cm 2 . It was found that the anodic overpotential was mainly dependent on the slow oxidation kinetics, with ohmic losses and concentration losses comprising only a negligible fraction of the total losses. Moreover, at catalysts loadings below 0.1 mg/cm 2 the anodic overpotentials increased exponentially, and the optimum loading was found to be 0.2 mg/cm 2 . However, no experimental tests have been found to support these results.

Combination of Platinum with Other Metals
As platinum has a high cost, the catalytic activity of some catalysts based on platinum but mixed with other metals have been investigated. The goal of this approach is to obtain catalysts as good as  [32]. Reprinted by permission of [24]. Copyright Elsevier Science BV. 2009. The catalyst electrochemical active surface area (ESA) was calculated with these data, and it was concluded that the ESA did not increase at the same level as the Pt loading increased. This means that utilization of Pt decreased with loading, due to higher inactive sites (interfaces between particles, support and binding material). A study of the effect of Pt loading on SO 2 oxidation was carried out in an SO 2 -saturated 50 wt % H 2 SO 4 solution. The limiting current density increased as the Pt loading increased. For a cell potential of 0.6 V, the apparent current density increased from 6.3 × 10 −3 to 1.4 × 10 −2 A/cm 2 with an increasing Pt loading amount from 0.4 to 4.0 mg/cm 2 . However, the current density remained almost constant at a high potential for the five studied catalyst loadings, indicating that the SO 2 oxidation reaction is controlled by the diffusion of dissolved SO 2 to the electrode in the high anodic over-potential range. Xue et al. [33] also carried out experiments with different Pt loadings in the range of 0.2-2.2 mg/cm 2 . The higher loading amount led to better electrolysis performances, as a result of more electrochemical reaction sites, peaking at 1 mg/cm 2 . Increasing the amount of platinum above that value led to worse performance, due to stacking of catalyst particles on one another. In addition, an excess of platinum increased the diffusion channel length and impeded the accessibility of the electro-active ion to the Pt surface [32,33]. For the authors' set-up, the optimal Pt loading was 1 mg/cm 2 in terms of platinum utilization, and polarization curves result. These authors also studied the influence of sulphuric acid concentration and temperature on the cell operating voltage, being the best electrolysis performance at 80 and 30 wt % sulphuric acid. Krüger et al. [34] evaluated some MEA manufacturing parameters, one of them being the catalyst loading. Their results are in concordance with studies carried out by previous authors [32,33]. Polarization curves obtained at 80 • C for catalyst loadings of 0.3, 0.5 and 1 mgPt/cm 2 showed that the best performance was for the catalyst loading of 1 mgPt/cm 2 . However, it should be noted that for the catalyst loadings of 0.3 and 0.5 mgPt/cm 2 , the platinum was supported on carbon, and for the highest catalyst loading platinum black was used.
Staser et al. [35] evaluated the effect of catalyst loading on the anodic overpotential suing a model and in the range of 0.001 to 1.5 mg Pt/cm 2 . It was found that the anodic overpotential was mainly dependent on the slow oxidation kinetics, with ohmic losses and concentration losses comprising only a negligible fraction of the total losses. Moreover, at catalysts loadings below 0.1 mg/cm 2 the anodic overpotentials increased exponentially, and the optimum loading was found to be 0.2 mg/cm 2 . However, no experimental tests have been found to support these results.

Combination of Platinum with Other Metals
As platinum has a high cost, the catalytic activity of some catalysts based on platinum but mixed with other metals have been investigated. The goal of this approach is to obtain catalysts as good as platinum, or even better materials for the electrochemical reduction of SO 2 with a lower cost, which would make it easier to scale the process.
Xue et al. [18] studied the electrochemical catalytic activity of different bi-metallic materials based on platinum. Vulcan XC-72R was the support for all catalysts. The metals that were employed were palladium, rhodium, ruthenium, iridium, and chromium. The total metal content was 60 wt %, with an atomic ratio of Pt-M 1:1. The catalyst loading was 1 mg metal/cm 2 . Figure 5 shows the performance of each catalyst, and for comparison purposes, platinum supported on a Vulcan XC-72R is also shown. The catalysts were evaluated at room temperature and in 30 wt % sulphuric acid concentration. The results showed that the best catalyst was 60 wt % Pt-Cr/XC72R, which was better than the catalyst containing only platinum.
Catalysts 2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 16 platinum, or even better materials for the electrochemical reduction of SO2 with a lower cost, which would make it easier to scale the process. Xue et al. [18] studied the electrochemical catalytic activity of different bi-metallic materials based on platinum. Vulcan XC-72R was the support for all catalysts. The metals that were employed were palladium, rhodium, ruthenium, iridium, and chromium. The total metal content was 60 wt %, with an atomic ratio of Pt-M 1:1. The catalyst loading was 1 mg metal/cm 2 . Figure 5 shows the performance of each catalyst, and for comparison purposes, platinum supported on a Vulcan XC-72R is also shown. The catalysts were evaluated at room temperature and in 30 wt % sulphuric acid concentration. The results showed that the best catalyst was 60 wt % Pt-Cr/XC72R, which was better than the catalyst containing only platinum.  [18]. Reprinted by permission of [24]. Copyright Elsevier Science BV. 2014.
In this work [11], the influence of the atomic ratio was also studied. The ratio 1:2 (Pt:Cr) resulted in equal or even better electrolysis performance than that of 60 wt % Pt/C. Also, the catalyst Pt-Ir/C showed promising results.
Falch et al. [36] studied the possibility of using plasma sputtering to form a electrocatalytic film of platinum and palladium. Both metals were sputtered at the same time to obtain bimetallic materials. Catalysts with different molar ratios of Pt and Pd were prepared. The compositions ranged from a Pt composition of 0 (pure palladium) to 1 (pure platinum). This technique allowed homogeneous distribution of both metals in the surface. The onset potential of the prepared catalysts was measured, as it is an indicator of catalytic activity [37][38][39]. The combinations with the lowest onset potential were Pt3Pd2 (0.587 V), Pt2Pd3 (0.590 V) and PtPd4 (0.587 V), which exhibited an onset potential slightly lower than that of pure platinum (0.598 V). The combination with the most promising results was Pt3Pd2, which was further investigated by the same authors [40]. The effect of thermal annealing on that sputtered catalyst and on pure platinum was investigated. Catalyst films were deposited as mentioned previously. The samples were annealed at temperatures ranging from 600 °C to 900 °C. The surface of the materials after deposition were smooth with no cracks; however, when increasing the temperature up to 900 °C, a discontinuous grain surface was formed. They measured the electrochemical surface area for pure platinum and the mixture Pt3Pd2 when it was rapidly annealed, and for a non-annealed sample. The annealing process clearly decreases the electrochemical active area, but for the Pt being smaller than for Pt3Pd2, this difference increased with an increase in the annealing temperature. Regarding onset potential, results showed that annealing does not have a positive influence on the catalyst, because it is higher than when they are not annealed for both platinum and Pt3Pd2. However, this technique does increase the lifetime of the catalysts in an acidic environment for Pt and Pt3Pd2 and normalised current density. The next step in their research was to add a non-noble metal, aiming better catalyst activity and a lower price. Falch et al. [41] developed a film composed of platinum, palladium and aluminium, which are co-sputtered on a support. They  [18]. Reprinted by permission of [24]. Copyright Elsevier Science BV. 2014.
In this work [11], the influence of the atomic ratio was also studied. The ratio 1:2 (Pt:Cr) resulted in equal or even better electrolysis performance than that of 60 wt % Pt/C. Also, the catalyst Pt-Ir/C showed promising results.
Falch et al. [36] studied the possibility of using plasma sputtering to form a electrocatalytic film of platinum and palladium. Both metals were sputtered at the same time to obtain bimetallic materials. Catalysts with different molar ratios of Pt and Pd were prepared. The compositions ranged from a Pt composition of 0 (pure palladium) to 1 (pure platinum). This technique allowed homogeneous distribution of both metals in the surface. The onset potential of the prepared catalysts was measured, as it is an indicator of catalytic activity [37][38][39]. The combinations with the lowest onset potential were Pt 3 Pd 2 (0.587 V), Pt 2 Pd 3 (0.590 V) and PtPd 4 (0.587 V), which exhibited an onset potential slightly lower than that of pure platinum (0.598 V). The combination with the most promising results was Pt 3 Pd 2 , which was further investigated by the same authors [40]. The effect of thermal annealing on that sputtered catalyst and on pure platinum was investigated. Catalyst films were deposited as mentioned previously. The samples were annealed at temperatures ranging from 600 • C to 900 • C. The surface of the materials after deposition were smooth with no cracks; however, when increasing the temperature up to 900 • C, a discontinuous grain surface was formed. They measured the electrochemical surface area for pure platinum and the mixture Pt 3 Pd 2 when it was rapidly annealed, and for a non-annealed sample. The annealing process clearly decreases the electrochemical active area, but for the Pt being smaller than for Pt 3 Pd 2 , this difference increased with an increase in the annealing temperature. Regarding onset potential, results showed that annealing does not have a positive influence on the catalyst, because it is higher than when they are not annealed for both platinum and Pt 3 Pd 2 . However, this technique does increase the lifetime of the catalysts in an acidic environment for Pt and Pt 3 Pd 2 and normalised current density. The next step in their research was to add a non-noble metal, aiming better catalyst activity and a lower price. Falch et al. [41] developed a film composed of platinum, palladium and aluminium, which are co-sputtered on a support. They made improvements on the onset potential and in current density, obtaining 396.73 mA/mgPt with the ternary combination Pt 40 Pd 57 Al 3 . Results changing Pt content show how the normalised current density increases with decreasing platinum content, from 100 mA/mgPt for pure platinum to 400 mA/mgPt for Pt 40 Pd 57 Al 3 . They concluded that the addition of other metal enhanced the electrocatalytic performance. Also, when annealed the ternary catalyst Pt 40 Pd 57 Al 3 increases the amount of aluminium on the surface. Xu et al. [42] synthetized a Pt/CeO 2 /C catalyst for enhancing the SO 2 electro-oxidation. ESA measurements showed that adding CeO 2 increased the active area of the catalysts, i.e., Pt/10CeO 2 /C (810.60 cm 2 /mg Pt) and Pt/20CeO 2 /C (765.10 cm 2 /mg Pt), which almost doubled Pt/C (429.10 cm 2 /mg Pt). The ESA of Pt/30CeO 2 /C was 512.90 cm 2 /mg Pt and that of Pt/40CeO 2 /C was 428.40 cm 2 /mg Pt. Catalysts with a content of CeO 2 below 50% gave current densities lower than for Pt/C, with the best ratio being Pt/20CeO 2 /C. The enhanced SO 2 electrooxidation of Pt/CeO 2 /C composite catalysts was attributed to the oxygen provided by CeO 2 , but no tests in an electrolysis cell were performed to support their findings of the half cell.
As summary, Figure 6 shows the values of voltage reached at different current densities obtained by different authors from 1980 until 2016, where it can be seen that there has been an improvement. However, in all cases the voltages are higher than the target proposed of 0.5 V at 0.5 A/cm 2 . Catalysts with a content of CeO2 below 50% gave current densities lower than for Pt/C, with the best ratio being Pt/20CeO2/C. The enhanced SO2 electrooxidation of Pt/CeO2/C composite catalysts was attributed to the oxygen provided by CeO2, but no tests in an electrolysis cell were performed to support their findings of the half cell.
As summary, Figure 6 shows the values of voltage reached at different current densities obtained by different authors from 1980 until 2016, where it can be seen that there has been an improvement. However, in all cases the voltages are higher than the target proposed of 0.5 V at 0.5 A/cm 2 .

Gold-Based Catalysts
In the early development of the electrolyzer for the hybrid sulphur cycle, gold was studied together with platinum as a catalyst for SO2 depolarized electrolysis.
Seo et al. [23] studied the electrochemical oxidation of sulphur dioxide on platinum and gold electrodes. The results on gold electrodes showed that reproducible data is obtained by scanning three or four times between −0.15 and 1.5 V (SCE). Compared with a platinum electrode, gold was easier to activate, due to the ease with which gold surface oxide films dissolve in acid solutions. However, extensive cathodization inhibited the electrode activity. They also distinguished two modes for the electrochemical oxidation of SO2 on gold, a pure electrochemical process and a chemical oxidation process. Appleby et al. [21] determined that gold is less promising than platinum, because the oxidation of SO2 involves participation of chemisorbed H, OH or O species. Rates for these processes are strongly influenced by the chemisorption properties of the substrate, and are several orders of magnitude higher on platinum than on gold. On the contrary, Samec and Weber [43] studied the oxidation of SO2 dissolved in 0.5 M H2SO4 on a rotating disc gold electrode. These Curent (mA/cm2) Cell potential (V) [13] [32] [21] [34] [27] [49] [25] [33] [20] Figure 6. Evolution of cell performance for SO 2 electro-oxidation with platinum-based catalysts. Data taken from bibliography.

Gold-Based Catalysts
In the early development of the electrolyzer for the hybrid sulphur cycle, gold was studied together with platinum as a catalyst for SO 2 depolarized electrolysis.
Seo et al. [23] studied the electrochemical oxidation of sulphur dioxide on platinum and gold electrodes. The results on gold electrodes showed that reproducible data is obtained by scanning three or four times between −0.15 and 1.5 V (SCE). Compared with a platinum electrode, gold was easier to activate, due to the ease with which gold surface oxide films dissolve in acid solutions. However, extensive cathodization inhibited the electrode activity. They also distinguished two modes for the electrochemical oxidation of SO 2 on gold, a pure electrochemical process and a chemical oxidation process. Appleby et al. [21] determined that gold is less promising than platinum, because the oxidation of SO 2 involves participation of chemisorbed H, OH or O species. Rates for these processes are strongly influenced by the chemisorption properties of the substrate, and are several orders of magnitude higher on platinum than on gold. On the contrary, Samec and Weber [43] studied the oxidation of SO 2 dissolved in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 on a rotating disc gold electrode. These authors reported a considerable enhancement of the SO 2 oxidation reaction after a preliminary voltammetry cycle to potentials encompassing SO 2 reduction. They proposed that oxidation of SO 2 on gold electrodes proceeds through an adsorbed intermediate, which is displaced from the electrode at voltages higher than 1.5 V when the oxide is formed; the oxidation current decreases to a fraction of the limiting current density at that potential. The authors also mention that SO 2 oxidation is a mass transfer-controlled process to the electrode. Similar results to Seo et al. [23] were obtained by Lu and Ammon, which showed similar catalytic activity for gold and platinum with similar limiting current densities (1.2 × 10 −3 mA/cm 2 for Pt and 2 × 10 −3 mA/cm 2 for Au) [20]. Quijada et al. studied the electrochemical behaviour of SO 2 with polycrystalline gold electrodes. They observed the reduction [44] and the oxidation [45] of SO 2 on gold electrodes. Regarding the oxidation of SO 2 on gold electrodes, it starts at a potential of 0.6 V, with a peak located between 0.75 and 0.85 V. This peak was higher when the concentration of SO 2 dissolved in H 2 SO 4 increased, making evident that this process is mass transfer-controlled, as mentioned before, and similar as on platinum electrodes. These authors also used sulphur-modified gold electrodes from the study of Samec and Weber [43]. SO 2 was reduced on the gold electrode, and then the effect of sulphur coverage on the kinetics of the SO 2 oxidation was examined. In those conditions, the oxidation of the SO 2 peak shifts to lower potentials, for a sulphur coverage of 0.5-from that point the oxidation peak shifts back. They concluded that gold exhibits a far better performance towards SO 2 oxidation when compared to platinum. O'Brien et al. [46] compared sulphur catalysis on gold and platinum. They observed that less sulphur is formed on gold electrodes, and it does not affect the catalytic activity as much as on platinum. Allen et al. [31] observed that a gold substrate is naturally catalytically active and does not require sulphur coverage for high activity; in addition, the oxidation mechanism on gold does not change with E low , whereas on platinum it does. Kriek et al. [19] modelled the electro-oxidation of SO 2 on transition metals. By calculating the maximum oxidation rate, they observed that platinum and gold are the best candidates among metals for SO 2 oxidation. They concluded that there are a limited number of metals that can be employed, due to different criteria such as inhibiting SO 2 reduction, no surface dissolution, and the metal must not be poisoned by atomic sulphur. Santasalo-Aarnio et al. [47] coated stainless steel bipolar plates with a gold layer, in order to catalyse the SO 2 oxidation and to improve the stainless steel corrosion tolerance at operation conditions. Au-coated stainless-steel bipolar plates were tested in a 100 cm 2 electrolyser for five days, and results showed that no significant loss of performance occurred. SO 2 oxidation occurs at potentials higher than 0.6 V for this electrode. Polarization curves at day one were very similar to the one at day four, indicating that the Au-coated bipolar plates have good durability and that the coating was not damaged. Nevertheless, the achieved current was very low for both days, and almost 0.5 A at 0.9 V was achieved in a 100 cm 2 single cell, which means that the current density was only around 5 mA/cm 2 .

Palladium-Based Catalysts
Palladium, as noble metal, has been studied both pure and supported as a catalyst for SO 2 oxidation. The first studies on palladium were carried out by Lu and Ammon; in this work, the results showed a better catalytic activity for palladium than for platinum, due to a higher limiting current density for the palladium electrode [20]. They also studied the oxidation of SO 2 on palladium electrodes at different temperatures (25,50,70 and 90 • C), obtaining the best current density for a potential of 0.6 V (SHE) at 90 • C (1.9 × 10 −3 A/cm 2 ). They prepared a catalyst based on palladium oxide supported on carbon, which again, gave higher current densities than a catalyst based on black platinum supported on carbon. What is more, the authors prepared a catalyst consisting of palladium oxide-titanium oxide supported on titanium, which exhibited an electrocatalytic activity quite comparable to the black-Pt/Ti. Scott and Taama studied the oxidation of SO 2 on palladium electrodes, palladium coated graphite, and palladium-coated Ebonex (a Magneli-phase suboxide of titanium, predominantly Ti 4 O 7 ) [26]. In this work, the palladium electrode gave a higher limiting current density than platinum. Regarding palladium-coated graphite a palladium coated Ebonex, linear sweep voltammetry shows complex curves exhibiting higher current densities than Pd, probably due to its greater exposed surface area. However, the Pd-coated electrodes showed deterioration. Colón-Mercado and Hobbs exanimated a Pd supported on carbon catalyst, which showed worse catalytic activity when compared with a catalyst based on platinum and supported on carbon. Furthermore, the Pd-based catalyst was less stable [30].

Catalysts Based on Other Compounds
Most of the works regarding SO 2 catalysis have been carried out with special interest on platinum, and to a lesser extent, on gold and palladium. However, aiming to develop a material with good catalytic properties and lower price, some other materials have been studied for SO 2 electro-oxidation.
Wiesener [24] carried out SO 2 electro-oxidations with catalysts based on mixtures of V 2 O 5 and Al 2 O 3 with different ratios. The main problem for this catalyst is its stability in acidic solutions. The optimal V/Al ratios were 1:3 and 1:6, because only a portion of vanadium was dissolved, with an amount ranging from 75 to 80% remaining in the catalyst. In general, this mixture showed worse catalytic activity than platinum. Appleby and Pinchon examined the catalytic activity of active carbons, graphites, carbon blacks, transition metal carbides, and precious metals supported on carbons [21]. Their results showed that graphites and carbides had no catalytic activity for SO 2 electro-oxidation. Active carbons had intermediate activity, but current densities were too low for use in any practical device. Lu and Ammon studied catalysts like RuOx-TiO 2 and IrOx-TiO 2 , supported on titanium, ruthenium, rhenium, iridium and rhodium (Figure 7) [20]. Ru showed similar catalytic activity as platinum; however, Ir, Re and Rh electrodes were relatively inactive for SO 2 oxidation; also, RuOx-TiO 2 /Ti and IrOx-TiOx/Ti electrodes are very ineffective for the electrochemical oxidation of SO 2 in acidic media.

Catalysts Based on Other Compounds
Most of the works regarding SO2 catalysis have been carried out with special interest on platinum, and to a lesser extent, on gold and palladium. However, aiming to develop a material with good catalytic properties and lower price, some other materials have been studied for SO2 electrooxidation.
Wiesener [24] carried out SO2 electro-oxidations with catalysts based on mixtures of V2O5 and Al2O3 with different ratios. The main problem for this catalyst is its stability in acidic solutions. The optimal V/Al ratios were 1:3 and 1:6, because only a portion of vanadium was dissolved, with an amount ranging from 75 to 80% remaining in the catalyst. In general, this mixture showed worse catalytic activity than platinum. Appleby and Pinchon examined the catalytic activity of active carbons, graphites, carbon blacks, transition metal carbides, and precious metals supported on carbons [21]. Their results showed that graphites and carbides had no catalytic activity for SO2 electrooxidation. Active carbons had intermediate activity, but current densities were too low for use in any practical device. Lu and Ammon studied catalysts like RuOx-TiO2 and IrOx-TiO2, supported on titanium, ruthenium, rhenium, iridium and rhodium (Figure 7) [20]. Ru showed similar catalytic activity as platinum; however, Ir, Re and Rh electrodes were relatively inactive for SO2 oxidation; also, RuOx-TiO2/Ti and IrOx-TiOx/Ti electrodes are very ineffective for the electrochemical oxidation of SO2 in acidic media.  [20]. Reproduced with permission of [12]. Copyright Electrochemical Society. 1980.
Scott and Taama also carried out voltammograms for glassy carbon, graphite electrodes, and lead oxides showing instability at high potentials [26]. Mu et al. [48] worked on the electrochemical oxidation of sulfur dioxide on nitrogen-doped graphite (NG) treated at temperatures ranging from 700 to 1000 °C. The catalytic activity of this material was compared with the activity of commercial 50% platinum supported on carbon and only Vulcan carbon XC-72. The results showed that NG treated at temperatures above 900 °C have better catalytic activity than the Vulcan carbon XC-72  [20]. Reproduced with permission of [12]. Copyright Electrochemical Society. 1980. Scott and Taama also carried out voltammograms for glassy carbon, graphite electrodes, and lead oxides showing instability at high potentials [26]. Mu et al. [48] worked on the electrochemical oxidation of sulfur dioxide on nitrogen-doped graphite (NG) treated at temperatures ranging from 700 to 1000 • C. The catalytic activity of this material was compared with the activity of commercial 50% platinum supported on carbon and only Vulcan carbon XC-72. The results showed that NG treated at temperatures above 900 • C have better catalytic activity than the Vulcan carbon XC-72 without Pt, but worse than 50% Pt/C. The BET surface area was measured for the doped graphite and increased with the temperature of the thermal treatment-for example, the BET area for NG800 (thermal treatment at 800 • C) was 301 m 2 /g, and for NG1000 (thermal treatment at 1000 • C) it was 425.8 mg/cm 2 . Potgieter et al. [49] evaluated polycrystalline rhodium as a catalyst for SO 2 electro-oxidation. When compared with platinum, Rh showed a lower catalytic activity and was more susceptible to poisoning by adsorbed intermediate sulphur species. Similar to Pt, for Rh a decrease in starting potential resulted in an increase on the onset potential, but the catalytic activity of Rh was very limited compared with Pt, which may indicate that Rh is not suitable for SO 2 electro-oxidation. Tulskiy et al. [50] studied graphite anodes coated with different catalysts, which were Pt, MoO 3 , RuO 2 and WO 3 . Polarization curves showed that the catalytic activity of those materials could be arranged following the sequence Pt > RuO 2 > MoO 3 > WO 3 . Zhao et al. [51] developed an Fe-N-Doped carbon-cladding catalyst with excellent SO 2 electrooxidation performance, close to the performance of Pt/C. It showed better stability when tested in H 2 SO 4 . Linear sweep voltammetry shows a catalytic activity similar to 20% Pt/C below 0.7 V (NHE). Physical characterization of the Fe-N-Doped carbon cladding showed a high surface area, mesoporous structures, and large pore volumes, which contribute to the formation of active sites and fast transport of reactants, which are beneficial for SO 2 electro-oxidation.

New Tendencies
The typical proton exchange membrane used in the electrolysis cell is a Nafion membrane. However, Nafion-based membranes have several limitations, including the inability to operate at elevated temperatures and decreased performance observed when exposed to high acid concentrations [35,52]. Thus, nowadays there is a tendency to work with Polybenzimidazole-based membranes (PBI), which work at high current densities to produce high sulphuric acid concentrations, and hence improve the efficiency of the electrolysis step of the cycle, as their proton conductivity does not rely on water [52]. These type of PBI-based membranes have been proposed for operating at high temperature (100-200 • C) for PEMFC technologies since 1995 [53][54][55][56]. In the case of the SO 2 electrolysis, high temperatures will have a positive impact, as the voltage losses (e.g., kinetic and ohmic resistances) would decrease [52] and the acid concentration produced could be higher [57]. Nevertheless, although the use of PBI-based membranes (sulfonated one) dates from 2012 [52], tests at temperatures higher than 90 • C were not performed. Garrick et al. [58] has recently shown results with a sulfonated PBI membrane and commercial electrodes from BASF with 1.0 mgPt/cm 2 for both anode and cathode in a SO 2 electrolysis cell operating at 110 • C. They concluded that the membrane resistance was not adversely affected by acid concentration, which offers benefits not seen when using Nafion. On the other hand, the large anodic overpotentials that exists in this system suggest a need for improved catalysts, and kinetics would improve with the higher temperatures afforded PBI-based membranes [58]. In this sense, higher temperatures will mean new challenges for new materials for this system, not only in terms of membranes and catalysts, but other parts of the cell. Our group has recently been working on the improvement of the Westinghouse cycle, using PBI-based membranes and novel catalyst supports for the electrochemical stage of that cycle. In the case of the catalyst support, we have proposed SiC-TiC based materials, according the previous results obtained for high temperature PEMFCs [59][60][61][62]. Recent results obtained by our group and not published yet have demonstrated that these non-carbonaceous supports can be a good candidate for the SO 2 electrolysis at high temperatures and very highly acidic conditions. Table 1 shows the values of the current at 1.0 V of cyclic voltammetry in sulphuric acid 1 M, reached before and after some electrochemical characterization tests of different catalysts. One of them is Pt supported on Vulcan carbon, and is commercial available; the other two catalysts were synthesized in our labs using the same method reported elsewhere [63], but with different support materials-in one case, the catalyst support was Vulcan XC 72, and the other was a binary carbide, SiC-TiC. It can be observed that the highest currents were achieved by the catalysts based on carbon supports. After some electrochemical characterization tests (out of the scope of this manuscript) that could be considered as an accelerate degradation test, the activity of the catalysts based on carbon supports, as well as the commercial and the handmade catalysts decreased around 6.4% and 10%, respectively. On the other hand, the activity of the catalysts based on the binary carbide support increased, which means that these novel supports show a high electrochemical stability for the electrochemical oxidation of SO 2 and are very promising for this electrochemical system.

Conclusions
This review points out that Pt-based catalysts are the most promising materials to be implemented in the electrolyzers of the Westinghouse process. Nevertheless, their performance is still lower than the target required for full scale applications (at least 0.5 A/cm 2 at a cell voltage of 0.6 V is recommended), as can be observed in Table 2, where the most relevant catalysts reported in this work are shown. Further work has to be done in the coming years in order to reach a marketable technology. As it is a general trend in the development of low-temperature fuel cells and electrolyzers, researchers try to decrease the Pt loading, in order to lower the price and make this technology more competitive. Nowadays, the typical Pt loading in the electrolyzers of the Westinghouse process is around 1 mg Pt/cm 2 . However, this value may be easily decreased if novel deposition techniques and novel supports are translated from already existing PEMFC technology. Another way that is currently being used to the face decrease in the use of Pt is replacing it with other metals. Pt-Cr and Au catalysts are the most promising substitutes of Pt catalysts, although results obtained with them are currently far away from the desired targets. A final way to improve the SO 2 depolarized electrolysis for the production of hydrogen is the rise in the operation temperature, which will favor the kinetics of the process, and hence, decrease the requirements of Pt in the electrode. However, this increase must face important challenges, such as the lower cell durability because of the higher thermal stress, which affects not only the catalyst but also other cell components, such as the membranes.
Anyhow, it is important to keep in mind that most of the results found in the literature come from studies carried out in half cells or in three-electrode assemblies using rotating electrodes. More essays in complete electrolyzers are required to support the results obtained with those catalysts, as well as clarifying the more relevant aspects of the scale-up of the process. Hence, there is still a very wide slot in this technology for development, which hopefully will be filled in the next years.