Applications of Immobilized Bio-Catalyst in Metal-Organic Frameworks

Immobilization of bio-catalysts in solid porous materials has attracted much attention in the last few decades due to its vast application potential in ex vivo catalysis. Despite the high efficiency and selectivity of enzymatic catalytic processes, enzymes may suffer from denaturation under industrial production conditions, which, in turn, diminish their catalytic performances and long-term recyclability. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), as a growing type of hybrid materials, have been identified as promising platforms for enzyme immobilization owing to their enormous structural and functional tunability, and extraordinary porosity. This review mainly focuses on the applications of enzyme@MOFs hybrid materials in catalysis, sensing, and detection. The improvements of catalytic activity and robustness of encapsulated enzymes over the free counterpart are discussed in detail.


Introduction
The history of utilizing bio-catalysts in production dates back to thousands of years ago when human learned to make alcohol from sugar via fermentation with the addition of yeast or other microorganisms.With the fusion of ideas from modern protein chemistry and molecular biology, enzymes, as nature's catalysts, have been extensively applied in industrial production, such as drug and food production [1][2][3].However, these applications are limited by the relatively low stability of enzymes, for example, weak thermal stability and high sensitivity to pH changes, which results in the lack of long-term recyclability and difficulty of separating enzymes from products [4,5].A possible strategy to overcome these issues is heterogeneously immobilizing enzymes on solid supports, which keeps enzymes in the confined microenvironment and prevents enzymes from denaturing [6][7][8].

Applications of Enzyme@MOFs Materials in Catalysis, Sensing, and Detection
Due to the high selectivity nature of enzymes, the applications of immobilized enzyme@MOFs materials are mainly for catalysis, sensing, and detection.Immobilized enzymes are separated by Catalysts 2018, 8, 166; doi:10.3390/catal8040166www.mdpi.com/journal/catalysts the pores of MOFs, which avoids their aggregation and facilitates high conversion rate.In addition, the physical confinement of the immobilized enzymes by the cavity wall of MOFs prevents the occurrence of protein denaturation.The synthetic approaches of enzyme@MOF materials also play a key role in their practical performances, especially in the aspect of promoting substrate diffusion and prohibiting enzyme leaching.Typically, the synthetic approaches can be classified into two major categories: one-pot synthesis and post-synthetic immobilization.One-pot synthesis, also known as biomineralization or co-precipitation, encapsulates the enzymes in the material through the formation of coordination porous shell structures.The core-shell structure creates diffusion pathways for substrates contacting the encapsulated enzymes.Post-synthetic immobilizations, including the formation of covalent and non-covalent bonds between MOF and enzymes, also provides strong host-guest interactions and accessible enzyme active sites.-3) MOFs [31] The carboxylate groups on the MOF surface were first activated and then reacted with the amino groups on the enzymes (Figure 1).The catalytic activity of the immobilized CAL-B was verified through transesterification of (±)-1-phenylethanol.CAL-B immobilized on IRMOF-3 showed 10 3 -fold higher activity than that of free CAL-B, while maintaining the same enantioselectivity.The authors proposed that the confined spaces in MOFs allow substrates to access enzymes more efficiently.Moreover, after three catalytic cycles, no significant decrease of enzymatic activity was observed.

Applications of Enzyme@MOFs Materials in Catalysis, Sensing, and Detection
Due to the high selectivity nature of enzymes, the applications of immobilized enzyme@MOFs materials are mainly for catalysis, sensing, and detection.Immobilized enzymes are separated by the pores of MOFs, which avoids their aggregation and facilitates high conversion rate.In addition, the physical confinement of the immobilized enzymes by the cavity wall of MOFs prevents the occurrence of protein denaturation.
The synthetic approaches of enzyme@MOF materials also play a key role in their practical performances, especially in the aspect of promoting substrate diffusion and prohibiting enzyme leaching.Typically, the synthetic approaches can be classified into two major categories: one-pot synthesis and post-synthetic immobilization.One-pot synthesis, also known as biomineralization or co-precipitation, encapsulates the enzymes in the material through the formation of coordination porous shell structures.The core-shell structure creates diffusion pathways for substrates contacting the encapsulated enzymes.Post-synthetic immobilizations, including the formation of covalent and non-covalent bonds between MOF and enzymes, also provides strong host-guest interactions and accessible enzyme active sites.The carboxylate groups on the MOF surface were first activated and then reacted with the amino groups on the enzymes (Figure 1).The catalytic activity of the immobilized CAL-B was verified through transesterification of (±)-1-phenylethanol.CAL-B immobilized on IRMOF-3 showed 10 3 -fold higher activity than that of free CAL-B, while maintaining the same enantioselectivity.The authors proposed that the confined spaces in MOFs allow substrates to access enzymes more efficiently.Moreover, after three catalytic cycles, no significant decrease of enzymatic activity was observed.(c) 3D + EGFP.An Olympus WIB filter set (λem = 460-490 nm; λem > 515 nm) was used for recording the fluorescence [31]; and (d) the catalytic reaction of racemate and the product enantiomers.Reproduced from [31] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2011.

Biomimetic Catalysis and Conversion
Ma group first reported the immobilization of MP-11 into a mesoporous MOF, Tb-mesoMOF [Tb16(tatb)16, tatb = triazine-1,3,5-tribenzoate], consisting of cages with diameters of 0.9, 3.0, and 4.1 nm (Figure 2) [32].After the loading of MP-11, the 3.0 and 4.1 nm cavities disappeared, while the 0.9 nm pore still existed, indicating the occupation of the enzyme in large pores and the accessible small pores for substrate diffusion.The BET surface area of Tb-mesoMOF drops from 1935 m 2 /g to 400 m 2 /g after MP-11 loading of 19.1 µmol/g.MCM-41, a mesoporous silica material with a lower surface area at ~1000 m 2 /g and a lower loading of 3.4 µmol/g [33], was also applied for MP-11 encapsulation.The MP-11@Tb-mesoMOF catalyzed the oxidation of 3,5-di-tert-butyl-catechol in the presence of H2O2.In comparison to free MP-11 and MP-11@MCM-41, MP-11@Tb-mesoMOF showed a much higher conversion percentage, reaction rate, and better recyclability after seven cycles.Proved by the (c) 3D + EGFP.An Olympus WIB filter set (λ em = 460-490 nm; λ em > 515 nm) was used for recording the fluorescence [31]; and (d) the catalytic reaction of racemate and the product enantiomers.Reproduced from [31] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2011.
Ma group first reported the immobilization of MP-11 into a mesoporous MOF, Tb-mesoMOF [Tb 16 (tatb) 16 , tatb = triazine-1,3,5-tribenzoate], consisting of cages with diameters of 0.9, 3.0, and 4.1 nm (Figure 2) [32].After the loading of MP-11, the 3.0 and 4.1 nm cavities disappeared, while the 0.9 nm pore still existed, indicating the occupation of the enzyme in large pores and the accessible small pores for substrate diffusion.The BET surface area of Tb-mesoMOF drops from 1935 m 2 /g to 400 m 2 /g after MP-11 loading of 19.1 µmol/g.MCM-41, a mesoporous silica material with a lower surface area at ~1000 m 2 /g and a lower loading of 3.4 µmol/g [33], was also applied for MP-11 encapsulation.The MP-11@Tb-mesoMOF catalyzed the oxidation of 3,5-di-tert-butyl-catechol in the presence of H 2 O 2 .In comparison to free MP-11 and MP-11@MCM-41, MP-11@Tb-mesoMOF showed a much higher conversion percentage, reaction rate, and better recyclability after seven cycles.Proved by the bathochromic shift of the immobilized MP-11 in Tb-mesoMOF compared to free MP-11, the hydrophobic interactions between the hydrophobic nanocage of Tb-mesoMOF and MP-11 were attributed to the better performance of MP-11@Tb-mesoMOF over free MP-11.
bathochromic shift of the immobilized MP-11 in Tb-mesoMOF compared to free MP-11, the hydrophobic interactions between the hydrophobic nanocage of Tb-mesoMOF and MP-11 were attributed to the better performance of MP-11@Tb-mesoMOF over free MP-11.(b) the 3.9 nm-diameter cage; (c) the 4.7 nm-diameter cage in Tb-mesoMOF; and (d) the reaction scheme for oxidation of 3,5-di-t-butylcatechol to o-quinone [32].Reproduced from [32] with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2011.
Zhou and co-workers reported two mesoporous MOFs, PCN-332 and -333, composed of M3O clusters and tritopic linkers (Figure 3) [34].PCN-333(Al) showed good stability in a pH range of 3-9 and exhibited hierarchical cavities with sizes of 1.1 nm, 4.2 nm, and 5.5 nm.The mesoporous cages functioned as single-molecule traps (SMTs) to encapsulate HRP and Cyt-c, whereas MP-11 as a smaller enzyme was immobilized by multiple-enzyme encapsulation (MEE).PCN-333(Al) demonstrated record-high enzyme loading capacity and much better recyclability than porous silicate materials, for example, SBA-15.In particular, PCN-333(Al) immobilized HRP and Cyt-c exhibited stronger substrate affinity and improved catalytic performance over free enzymes owing to the separation of enzymes in the cages, which prevents the undesirable self-aggregation during the reaction.[34].Reproduced from [34] with permission from Springer Nature, copyright 2015.Falcaro et al. provided a biomineralization approach to encapsulate biomacromolecules in ZIF-8 [35].The ZIF-8/proteins were simply prepared by soaking the protein in 2-methylimidazole aqueous solution and mixed with zinc acetate aqueous solution.The activity of ZIF-8/HRP was examined by monitoring the rate of H2O2 decomposition with pyrogallol as the hydrogen donor, (b) the 3.9 nm-diameter cage; (c) the 4.7 nm-diameter cage in Tb-mesoMOF; and (d) the reaction scheme for oxidation of 3,5-di-t-butylcatechol to o-quinone [32].Reproduced from [32] with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2011.
Zhou and co-workers reported two mesoporous MOFs, PCN-332 and -333, composed of M 3 O clusters and tritopic linkers (Figure 3) [34].PCN-333(Al) showed good stability in a pH range of 3-9 and exhibited hierarchical cavities with sizes of 1.1 nm, 4.2 nm, and 5.5 nm.The mesoporous cages functioned as single-molecule traps (SMTs) to encapsulate HRP and Cyt-c, whereas MP-11 as a smaller enzyme was immobilized by multiple-enzyme encapsulation (MEE).PCN-333(Al) demonstrated record-high enzyme loading capacity and much better recyclability than porous silicate materials, for example, SBA-15.In particular, PCN-333(Al) immobilized HRP and Cyt-c exhibited stronger substrate affinity and improved catalytic performance over free enzymes owing to the separation of enzymes in the cages, which prevents the undesirable self-aggregation during the reaction.[32].Reproduced from [32] with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2011.
Zhou and co-workers reported two mesoporous MOFs, PCN-332 and -333, composed of M3O clusters and tritopic linkers (Figure 3) [34].PCN-333(Al) showed good stability in a pH range of 3-9 and exhibited hierarchical cavities with sizes of 1.1 nm, 4.2 nm, and 5.5 nm.The mesoporous cages functioned as single-molecule traps (SMTs) to encapsulate HRP and Cyt-c, whereas MP-11 as a smaller enzyme was immobilized by multiple-enzyme encapsulation (MEE).PCN-333(Al) demonstrated record-high enzyme loading capacity and much better recyclability than porous silicate materials, for example, SBA-15.In particular, PCN-333(Al) immobilized HRP and Cyt-c exhibited stronger substrate affinity and improved catalytic performance over free enzymes owing to the separation of enzymes in the cages, which prevents the undesirable self-aggregation during the reaction.[34].Reproduced from [34] with permission from Springer Nature, copyright 2015.Falcaro et al. provided a biomineralization approach to encapsulate biomacromolecules in ZIF-8 [35].The ZIF-8/proteins were simply prepared by soaking the protein in 2-methylimidazole aqueous solution and mixed with zinc acetate aqueous solution.The activity of ZIF-8/HRP was examined by monitoring the rate of H2O2 decomposition with pyrogallol as the hydrogen donor,  [34].Reproduced from [34] with permission from Springer Nature, copyright 2015.
Falcaro et al. provided a biomineralization approach to encapsulate biomacromolecules in ZIF-8 [35].The ZIF-8/proteins were simply prepared by soaking the protein in 2-methylimidazole aqueous solution and mixed with zinc acetate aqueous solution.The activity of ZIF-8/HRP was examined by monitoring the rate of H 2 O 2 decomposition with pyrogallol as the hydrogen donor, which can be converted to a yellowish product, purpurogallin.Owing to the excellent stability of ZIF-8, the coated DNA, proteins, and enzymes exhibited much-improved chemical and thermal stability.
For example, the immobilized HRP maintained its catalytic activity in boiling water (100 • C) or in boiling DMF (153 • C).

Protein Digestion and Chemical Degradation
Trypsin is a commonly-used protease that catalyzes protein digestion and transformation into peptides for proteomics analysis and industrial production.The practical application of trypsin often suffers from the long running time (18-24 h) and self-digestion in the reaction media [36] Immobilization on MOFs is capable of preventing the self-digestion and improve their recyclability.Unlike most of the catalytic reactions for chemical conversions, the substrates of trypsin are proteins, which are typically larger than the pore size of MOFs.Thus, trypsin is normally attached to the surface of MOFs instead of encapsulated inside of the pores to allow better substrate accessibility.Bovine serum albumin (BSA) digestion is usually used as the model reaction.
Lin and Huang et al. reported a novel trypsin-FITC@MOF bioreactor that showed high protein digestion efficiency [37].Trypsin was first modified with fluorescein isothiocyanate dye (FITC) by bioconjugation via microwave.Then, FITC was trapped in the cavity of CYCU-4 ([Al(OH)(SDC)], SDC = 4,4 -stilbenedicarboxylic acid) through strong π-π interaction and hydrogen bonding between FITC and MOF linker.In the BSA digestion test, FITC@CYCU-4 obtained 47 matched peptides and 72% sequence coverage confirmed by nanoLC-MS 2 followed with Mascot database searching.These results were comparable to free trypsin-FITC.The same group also reported a similar dye-assisted enzyme immobilization method utilizing a small molecular dye, 4-chloro-7-nitrobenzofurazan (NBD) [38].The dye-modified trypsin exhibited the best activities when immobilized on CYCU-4 and UiO-66, which demonstrated 69-71% conversion percentage even after five consecutive catalytic cycles.On the contrary, NBD-FITC@MIL-100 or MIL-101 only demonstrated moderate activities.This can be ascribed to the size mismatch between NBD and the cavities of MOFs (MIL-100 or MIL-101).
The same group synthesized covalent linkage trypsin-MOF composite (Figure 4) [39].MIL-101(Cr), MIL-88B(Cr), and MIL-88B-NH 2 (Cr) were firstly activated by N,N -dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) and then conjugated with trypsin through the formation of peptide bonds.The digestion of BSA was performed with the assistance of ultrasonication for 2 min.Trypsin-MIL-88B-NH 2 (Cr) showed much higher amino acid sequence coverage percentage and more matched peptides than the other two composites.This can be ascribed to the higher substrate affinity of MIL-88B-NH 2 through the hydrogen bond between the surface amino groups on MOF and the protein.The BSA digestion result of trypsin-MIL-88B-NH 2 was similar to that of free trypsin, indicating that the immobilization did not compromise enzyme activity or substrate accessibility.

Tandem Reaction with Multiple Enzymes
Tandem reaction is a chemical process that comprises at least two consecutive reactions [42].The products of the previous step become the substrates in the next step of the reaction under the same condition without the necessity of isolating the intermediates.Thus, compared with single enzyme immobilization, more delicate designs are needed to immobilize multiple enzymes in the same system to catalyze tandem reactions.
Inspired by the hierarchical structure and ligand extension strategy, PCN-888 was rationally designed as a tandem nanoreactor that possessed even larger cavities for the co-encapsulation of HRP and GOx (Figure 5) [41].The loading order of the two enzymes (GOx first, HRP second) was essential for the preparation of the bi-enzyme nanoreactor.The reversed order would end up loading HRP in both large and intermediate pores and attaching GOx only on the MOF surface.In the bi-enzyme system, GOx catalyzed the oxidation of glucose by oxygen, yielding gluconolactone and hydrogen peroxide.The latter was the substrate in the conversion of ABTS to ABTS + catalyzed by HRP.The generation of ABTS + , as monitored by UV-VIS spectroscopy at 403 nm, was utilized to trace the reaction.The leaching of enzymes from PCN-888 was negligible, which could be due to the presence of the π-π interaction between the enzyme and the conjugated heptazine core and terminal benzene rings on the ligands.
A recent work by Zhou et al. reported the encapsulation of two antioxidative enzymes, SOD and CAT, in fluorescent nanoscale PCN-333 (FNPCN-333) for the removal of toxic reactive oxygen species from human cells [43].SOD catalyzes the disproportionation of superoxide and generates hydrogen   Reproduced from [41] with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2016.

Tandem Reaction with Multiple Enzymes
Tandem reaction is a chemical process that comprises at least two consecutive reactions [42].The products of the previous step become the substrates in the next step of the reaction under the same condition without the necessity of isolating the intermediates.Thus, compared with single enzyme immobilization, more delicate designs are needed to immobilize multiple enzymes in the same system to catalyze tandem reactions.
Inspired by the hierarchical structure and ligand extension strategy, PCN-888 was rationally designed as a tandem nanoreactor that possessed even larger cavities for the co-encapsulation of HRP and GOx (Figure 5) [41].The loading order of the two enzymes (GOx first, HRP second) was essential for the preparation of the bi-enzyme nanoreactor.The reversed order would end up loading HRP in both large and intermediate pores and attaching GOx only on the MOF surface.In the bi-enzyme system, GOx catalyzed the oxidation of glucose by oxygen, yielding gluconolactone and hydrogen peroxide.The latter was the substrate in the conversion of ABTS to ABTS + catalyzed by HRP.The generation of ABTS + , as monitored by UV-VIS spectroscopy at 403 nm, was utilized to trace the reaction.The leaching of enzymes from PCN-888 was negligible, which could be due to the presence of the π-π interaction between the enzyme and the conjugated heptazine core and terminal benzene rings on the ligands.
A recent work by Zhou et al. reported the encapsulation of two antioxidative enzymes, SOD and CAT, in fluorescent nanoscale PCN-333 (FNPCN-333) for the removal of toxic reactive oxygen species from human cells [43].SOD catalyzes the disproportionation of superoxide and generates hydrogen  [41] with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2016.

Tandem Reaction with Multiple Enzymes
Tandem reaction is a chemical process that comprises at least two consecutive reactions [42].The products of the previous step become the substrates in the next step of the reaction under the same condition without the necessity of isolating the intermediates.Thus, compared with single enzyme immobilization, more delicate designs are needed to immobilize multiple enzymes in the same system to catalyze tandem reactions.
Inspired by the hierarchical structure and ligand extension strategy, PCN-888 was rationally designed as a tandem nanoreactor that possessed even larger cavities for the co-encapsulation of HRP and GOx (Figure 5) [41].The loading order of the two enzymes (GOx first, HRP second) was essential for the preparation of the bi-enzyme nanoreactor.The reversed order would end up loading HRP in both large and intermediate pores and attaching GOx only on the MOF surface.In the bi-enzyme system, GOx catalyzed the oxidation of glucose by oxygen, yielding gluconolactone and hydrogen peroxide.The latter was the substrate in the conversion of ABTS to ABTS + catalyzed by HRP.The generation of ABTS + , as monitored by UV-VIS spectroscopy at 403 nm, was utilized to trace the reaction.The leaching of enzymes from PCN-888 was negligible, which could be due to the presence of the π-π interaction between the enzyme and the conjugated heptazine core and terminal benzene rings on the ligands.
A recent work by Zhou et al. reported the encapsulation of two antioxidative enzymes, SOD and CAT, in fluorescent nanoscale PCN-333 (FNPCN-333) for the removal of toxic reactive oxygen species from human cells [43].SOD catalyzes the disproportionation of superoxide and generates hydrogen peroxide and oxygen.Hydrogen peroxide is further decomposed into water and oxygen catalyzed by CAT.The loading of SOD and CAT was conducted in a similar stepwise manner.The as-synthesized "nanofactory" was tested to be stable in the acidic environment and was enzymatically functional in endocytic organelles.Compared with free enzymes, the enzyme@MOF nanofactory demonstrated intracellular enzymatic activity for up to a week, thanks to the MOF protection against the proteolytic digestion and acidic organelle environment.

Applications in Sensing and Detection
Bio-catalyst immobilized sensing and detection devices, in other words, biosensors, are of great interest in the field of glucose monitoring, food analysis, cancer diagnosis, etc. Especially, glucose biosensors account for approximately 85% of the entire biosensor market owing to the great need of millions of daily diabetics test to monitor blood glucose levels [44].GOx, GDH, and hexokinase are three of commonly-used enzymes for glucose measurements [45].The general aim of the design of a biosensor is to allow quick and convenient testing at the point of concern or care where the sample is procured.This requires the enzymes of the biosensors to be stable and functional in an unnatural environment.Thus, MOFs are considered as promising immobilization matrices to effectively protect the enzymes against perturbations.
Mao and Yang et al. utilized a series of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), including ZIF-7, -8, -67, -68, and -70, as the matrices to immobilize methylene green (MG) and GDH as biosensors (Figure 6) [46].To prepare the biosensor, a MG/ZIF composite was drop-coated on a glassy carbon electrode and then GDH was coated.Among the five ZIFs, MG/ZIF-70 composite biosensor showed the best performance with a glucose sensitivity linear range of 0.1-2 mM and a sensitivity of 54 mA M −1 cm −2 .In addition, this ZIF-based biosensor demonstrated a quick response and high selectivity for in vivo monitoring of glucose in the cerebral system.
Catalysts 2018, 7, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 10 peroxide and oxygen.Hydrogen peroxide is further decomposed into water and oxygen catalyzed by CAT.The loading of SOD and CAT was conducted in a similar stepwise manner.The assynthesized "nanofactory" was tested to be stable in the acidic environment and was enzymatically functional in endocytic organelles.Compared with free enzymes, the enzyme@MOF nanofactory demonstrated intracellular enzymatic activity for up to a week, thanks to the MOF protection against the proteolytic digestion and acidic organelle environment.

Applications in Sensing and Detection
Bio-catalyst immobilized sensing and detection devices, in other words, biosensors, are of great interest in the field of glucose monitoring, food analysis, cancer diagnosis, etc. Especially, glucose biosensors account for approximately 85% of the entire biosensor market owing to the great need of millions of daily diabetics test to monitor blood glucose levels [44].GOx, GDH, and hexokinase are three of commonly-used enzymes for glucose measurements [45].The general aim of the design of a biosensor is to allow quick and convenient testing at the point of concern or care where the sample is procured.This requires the enzymes of the biosensors to be stable and functional in an unnatural environment.Thus, MOFs are considered as promising immobilization matrices to effectively protect the enzymes against perturbations.
Mao and Yang et al. utilized a series of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), including ZIF-7, -8, -67, -68, and -70, as the matrices to immobilize methylene green (MG) and GDH as biosensors (Figure 6) [46].To prepare the biosensor, a MG/ZIF composite was drop-coated on a glassy carbon electrode and then GDH was coated.Among the five ZIFs, MG/ZIF-70 composite biosensor showed the best performance with a glucose sensitivity linear range of 0.1-2 mM and a sensitivity of 54 mA M −1 cm −2 .In addition, this ZIF-based biosensor demonstrated a quick response and high selectivity for in vivo monitoring of glucose in the cerebral system.[47].The sensor was assembled by successive deposition of MOFs and GOx on the surface of PtNP-CIE (CIE = carbon ink electrode).Among all the MOFs applied, MIL-100(Fe) based biosensor exhibited the best performance, which was likely owing to a synergism of the structural properties of MIL-100(Fe) and the catalytic properties of Fe 3+ .The glucose sensitivity was determined to be 71 mA M −1 cm −2 and the response time was under 5 s.The sensors based on other MOFs presented non-linear relationships in the range of low glucose concentration and much longer response times.
Liu et al. reported a composite that was prepared using amino-containing MOF (MIL-101(Al)-NH 2 ) as the host support to anchor Hemin as an enzyme mimic in order to simulate the peptidic microenvironment in the native peroxidase [48].The oxidation of 3,3,5,5-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) by H 2 O 2 and the oxidation of glucose catalyzed by GOx were used to evaluate its performance.TMB oxidation demonstrated a linear range with the concentration of H 2 O 2 from 5.0 µM to 200 µM (R 2 = 0.994).For the glucose detection, it was observed to have a linear range from 10 µM to 300 µM (R 2 = 0.993).

Conclusions
In summary, we reviewed a variety of applications of MOF-based immobilized bio-catalysts in chemical conversion, protein digestion, tandem reaction, sensing, and detection.MOFs, as the porous solid supports, normally provide the separation of enzymes (in other words, avoiding aggregation), shielding for enzymes against perturbation conditions, cavity micro-environment that may benefit MOF-enzyme interaction and substrate diffusion, and potential catalytic sites from metal clusters or organic linkers.These benefiting factors, in turn, offer better reusability and better catalytic activity compared to free enzymes.However, it is worth noting that even though this area has been studied for almost a decade, there is still a large gap between benchtop results and practical applications.Many of the catalytic reactions and protein digestion cases are proof-of-concept models at ex vivo conditions.The specific interaction sites between the framework of MOFs and biocatalysts are largely unknown.The same statement can be made for the exact effect of the confined environment in MOF cavities on the diffusion of the substrate and product.The size matching between MOFs' pores and enzymes plays a key role in the encapsulation approach as shown in some examples mentioned.The large enzyme may not be able to enter small MOF pores via post-synthetic method, whereas small enzymes may suffer from leaching problems in large pores.The rational design of MOFs that matches the size of enzymes well and provides excellent substrates/products would be of great interest for future study.In addition, few reported examples have shown the capability to immobilize multiple enzymes in one MOF system for tandem reactions.The development of the multi-enzyme systems would have the potential to gain more commercial popularity owing to their multifunctionalities.
Catalysts 2018, 7, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 10 bathochromic shift of the immobilized MP-11 in Tb-mesoMOF compared to free MP-11, the hydrophobic interactions between the hydrophobic nanocage of Tb-mesoMOF and MP-11 were attributed to the better performance of MP-11@Tb-mesoMOF over free MP-11.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Schematic of the results of the stepwise encapsulation of GOx and HRP with different loading orders in PCN-888.Reproduced from [41] with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2016.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Schematic of the results of the stepwise encapsulation of GOx and HRP with different loading orders in PCN-888.Reproduced from [41] with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2016.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Schematic of the results of the stepwise encapsulation of GOx and HRP with different loading orders in PCN-888.Reproduced from [41] with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2016.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Schematic of the design of ZIF-70-based electrochemical biosensor.Reproduced from[46] with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2013.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Schematic of the design of ZIF-70-based electrochemical biosensor.Reproduced from[46] with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2013.