Effect of Dopant Loading on the Structural and Catalytic Properties of Mn-Doped SrTiO 3 Catalysts for Catalytic Soot Combustion

Soot particles have been associated with respiratory diseases and cancer. To decrease these emissions, perovskite-mixed oxides have been proposed due to their thermal stability and redox surface properties. In this work, SrTiO3 doped with different amounts of Mn were synthesized by the hydrothermal method and tested for soot combustion. Results show that at low Mn content, structural distortion, and higher Oads/Olat ratio were observed which was attributed to the high content of Mn3+ in Ti sites. On the other hand, increasing the Mn content led to surface segregation of manganese oxide. All synthesized catalysts showed mesopores in the range of 32–47 nm. In the catalytic combustion of soot, the samples synthesized in this work lowered the combustion temperature by more than 100 ◦C compared with the uncatalyzed reaction. The sample doped with 1 wt % of Mn showed the best catalytic activity. The activation energy of these samples was also calculated, and the order of decreasing activation energy is as follows: uncatalyzed > Mn0 > Mn8 > Mn4 > Mn1. The best catalytic activity for Mn1 was attributed to its physicochemical properties and the mobility of the oxygen from the bulk to the surface at temperatures higher than 500 ◦C.


Introduction
Recently, demand for diesel engines has been increasing.Unfortunately, the use of these engines is associated with large amounts of atmospheric emissions.Efforts to reduce of NO x and particulate matter in these emissions have been attracting more and more attention in the scientific community.In particular, fine soot particles have been associated with respiratory diseases and premature death by cancer [1].In addition, the US-EPA has shown that soot particles are correlated with lung cancer in humans [2].For this reason, governments around the world have been working to curb these emissions [3].Diesel particulate filters with oxidation catalysis is, so far, the most promising technique to solve this problem.It is well known the combustion temperature of soot is approximately 700 • C, which is much higher than the typical temperature in the diesel exhaust.Noble metal catalysts such as Pt and Pd have acceptable reported efficiencies [4][5][6]; however, their high cost and deactivation due to coke formation compels us to seek alternatives.
A new alternative is the use of transition metal oxides with perovskite structure which have been used as catalysts for soot and volatile organic compounds [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] or photocatalysts mainly related with the remotion of organic compounds [17,18].Most perovskites, in particular SrTiO 3 , are characterized by high thermal stability, oxidative properties, and low cost, which make them good candidates for catalysts [7].Recently, perovskites with the general structure ABO 3 , with different values of A or B, have been used as catalysts in soot oxidation reactions.Lopez-Suarez et al. reported that SrTiO 3 impregnated with Cu and synthesized by the sol-gel method showed the highest catalytic activity over Cu/MgTiO 3 and other supports, decreasing the combustion temperature by approximately 10%.They attributed this behavior to weakly bound oxygen, which was promoted by the Cu-SrTiO 3 interactions [8].Later, the same group reported that lattice copper in SrTiCuO 3 promotes the NO x chemisorption and oxidation capacity which is associated with the best catalytic activity during soot oxidation decreasing the combustion temperature by approximately 30% comparing the uncatalyzed reaction [9].Feng et al. reported the doping by Ce and Co in LaFeO 3 .They observed an increase in the redox property by adding 6 at % of Ce in A site and 12 at % Co in B site.However, excessive levels of these metals inhibited the improvement in the catalytic activity due to the formation of CeO 2 and Co 3 O 4 [10].Later, the same group prepared La 0.8 Ce 0.2 Mn 1−x Fe x O 3 impregnated with K.They observed that partial modification of B site by adding Fe promotes the redox properties of the catalyst while K on the surface enhances the formation of oxygen active species both increasing the catalytic activity [11].Pecchi et al. studied the same perovskite mentioned above (LaMnO 3 ), however they partially substituted the A and B sites to prepare La 1−x Ag x Mn 0.9 Co 0.1 O 3 .They reported that the presence of Ag in the A site promotes the formation of oxygen vacancies that are associated with higher oxygen adsorption, enhancing the catalytic activity [12].Hernandez et al. worked with La 0.6 Sr 0.4 BO 3 where B = Fe, Mn, and Ti prepared by thermal decomposition route.The sample with Mn showed the best catalytic activity during the soot oxidation reaction.They attributed this behavior to the Mn 4+ species, which can be locally reduced by transporting oxygen to the catalyst-soot interface [13].
As described above, changing A or B sites in perovskites modifies its redox properties, which can improve catalytic activity.In addition, it is well known that Ti or B site in perovskite structure can be as Ti 4+ or Ti 3+ or its redox pair depending the metal in the A site or the existence of defects in the perovskite [19][20][21][22].Additionally, for SrTiO 3 , different metal can be incorporated as a metal dopant in the B site, making it a good candidate for soot oxidation [8,9].On the other hand, LaMnO 3 has a similar structure and can also work as a catalyst in this reaction due the different Mn species in the B site [13].For these reasons, and considering the different species of Mn, SrTiO 3 doped by Mn in Ti sites was tested as catalysts in soot combustion.Mn was used as a dopant to promote the formation of structural defects in the perovskite catalyst.Samples obtained in this work have a peculiar dendritic morphology with high surface area to improve the catalyst-soot contact and enhance its catalytic activity.

Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows X-ray diffractograms for catalysts prepared in this study.All samples show the formation of SrTiO 3 with a cubic structure and a theoretical lattice parameter of 3.8980 Å, according to PDF-01-084-0443 (Figure 1a).In addition, some impurities of SrCO 3 are observed in all samples.It is well known that the carbonate species can be formed if the hydroxides or SrO are in contact with atmospheric CO 2 during the hydrothermal reaction [7,23].No evidence of MnO x is detected, indicating the possible incorporation of Mn into the SrTiO 3 lattice.Figure 1b shows an enlargement of the peak located at 32.45 • in 2θ.A slight shift to higher angles is observed in samples doped by 1 wt % Mn.However, at higher Mn content, the position of the peak returns to low angles.This behavior could indicate high structural distortion produced by different ionic radius to the metal dopant as was previously reported for these samples [17,18].In addition, Table 1 shows crystallite size calculated using the peak shown in Figure 1b.A slight decrease is observed by adding 1 wt % of Mn, followed by an increase as the Mn content increases.This table also shows the lattice parameters calculated for all catalysts synthesized in this work.A slight decrease in the lattice parameter is observed for the Mn1 sample confirming the structural distortion in this sample.When the content of Mn is increased (Mn8 sample), the lattice parameter returns to its original value (undoped sample Mn0).It is worth mentioning that Mn0 sample has similar lattice parameters to the theoretical parameters reported in the XRD card mentioned above.The ICP results shown in Table 1 confirm the total content of Mn in each sample, which were very close to the theoretical values.From these results, it is feasible to deduce that structural distortion is mainly produced at lower amounts of Mn dopant [17].The morphology of catalysts is observed in Figure 2, which is a representative image of all samples synthesized in this work.No difference was observed among samples despite the different amounts of Mn.Dendritic morphology is clearly detected for all samples; dendrites are composed by a main long branch approximately 0.5 μm in length.The formation of dendrites is associated with the diffusion process during the hydrothermal reaction [24,25].Figure 2c,d show the elemental surface concentration of samples shown in Figure 2a,b.It is clearly observed that the surface for sample Mn0 is absent any Mn (Figure 2d), but in sample Mn4, some content of Mn below the 4 wt % is detected.The remaining Mn content should be incorporated into the structure in the A or B sites of ABO3.The experimental ratio Sr/Ti is 2.03 and 1.56 for Mn4 and Mn0, respectively, which are very close to the theoretical values of 2.13 and 1.81 assuming that Mn occupies Ti sites in the Mn4 sample.
Surface characterization was carried out by XPS. Figure 3a shows Mn 2p 3/2 spectra in the range 626-648 eV, and the deconvolution analysis of the samples synthesized in this work.It is clearly observed that higher intensity peaks indicate higher amounts of Mn as expected.From the deconvolution analysis, two well-defined peaks are clearly observed at 641.5 and 642.9 eV.However, the sample doped by 8 wt % Mn showed a displacement to lower binding energies, with peaks at 640.9 and 641.8 eV.The earlier peaks are related to the existence of Mn 3+ and Mn 4+ on the surface of the catalyst while the latter could be associated with the formation of Mn 2+ and Mn 3+ on the surface of the Mn8 sample [13,26].This behavior agrees well with the slight displacement to higher angles observed in Figure 1b for Mn1 sample, which can be associated with the differences in ionic radii among species.It is well known that Mn 3+ has an ionic radius of 72 Å, which is very similar to that reported for Ti 4+ (74 Å).However, Mn 4+ has a lower ionic radius (67 Å) than Ti 4+ and Mn 3+ ; this   The morphology of catalysts is observed in Figure 2, which is a representative image of all samples synthesized in this work.No difference was observed among samples despite the different amounts of Mn.Dendritic morphology is clearly detected for all samples; dendrites are composed by a main long branch approximately 0.5 µm in length.The formation of dendrites is associated with the diffusion process during the hydrothermal reaction [24,25].Figure 2c,d show the elemental surface concentration of samples shown in Figure 2a,b.It is clearly observed that the surface for sample Mn0 is absent any Mn (Figure 2d), but in sample Mn4, some content of Mn below the 4 wt % is detected.The remaining Mn content should be incorporated into the structure in the A or B sites of ABO 3 .The experimental ratio Sr/Ti is 2.03 and 1.56 for Mn4 and Mn0, respectively, which are very close to the theoretical values of 2.13 and 1.81 assuming that Mn occupies Ti sites in the Mn4 sample.
Surface characterization was carried out by XPS. Figure 3a shows Mn 2p 3/2 spectra in the range 626-648 eV, and the deconvolution analysis of the samples synthesized in this work.It is clearly observed that higher intensity peaks indicate higher amounts of Mn as expected.From the deconvolution analysis, two well-defined peaks are clearly observed at 641.5 and 642.9 eV.However, the sample doped by 8 wt % Mn showed a displacement to lower binding energies, with peaks at 640.9 and 641.8 eV.The earlier peaks are related to the existence of Mn 3+ and Mn 4+ on the surface of the catalyst while the latter could be associated with the formation of Mn 2+ and Mn 3+ on the surface of the Mn8 sample [13,26].This behavior agrees well with the slight displacement to higher angles observed in Figure 1b for Mn1 sample, which can be associated with the differences in ionic radii among species.It is well known that Mn 3+ has an ionic radius of 72 Å, which is very similar to that reported for Ti 4+ (74 Å).However, Mn 4+ has a lower ionic radius (67 Å) than Ti 4+ and Mn 3+ ; this different size can explain the distortion observed in Figure 1b.On the other hand, the higher Mn 3+ /Mn 4+ ratio in the Mn1 sample obtained by XPS (Table 2) can promote the formation of structural defects, such as oxygen vacancies in the perovskite catalyst, due to the loss of charge neutrality after the substitution of Mn 3+ in Ti 4+ sites.These defects can also be related to the distortion observed in Figure 1b by XRD.The smaller crystallite size and the lattice parameter shown in Table 1 for this sample (Mn1) confirm this discussion.In contrast, the high content of Mn in sample Mn8 resulted in the formation of Mn 3+ with small percentage of Mn 2+ (0.81 Å) located on the surface of the catalyst, likely as Mn 3 O 4 or MnO, but not into the structure as Mn1.For this reason, the distortion in Figure 1b decreases for Mn8 having the same 2θ value than Mn0 with similar lattice parameter (Table 1).Figure 3b also confirms the discussion mentioned above.Figure 3b shows the O 1s spectra obtained by XPS.The deconvolution analysis shows two well defined peaks in all samples located at 528.8 and 530.6 eV, which are respectively attributed to lattice oxygen (O lat ) from the perovskite structure or surface segregated oxides and surface adsorbed oxygen (O ads ), associated with defect oxides [27], carbonates or hydroxyl species, as well as weakly bonded oxygen adsorbed on the surface [13,26].The O ads /O lat ratio shown in Table 2 demonstrates high O ads in the Mn1 sample, which can be attributed to the structural defects produced by the Mn 3+ /Mn 4+ ratio shown in Table 2 [1].On the other hand, the Mn8 sample shows higher O lat , attributable to manganese oxides segregated on the surface of the catalyst, confirming a lower degree of distortion (Figure 1b) and the formation of Mn 2+ (Figure 3a).different size can explain the distortion observed in Figure 1b.On the other hand, the higher Mn 3+ /Mn 4+ ratio in the Mn1 sample obtained by XPS (Table 2) can promote the formation of structural defects, such as oxygen vacancies in the perovskite catalyst, due to the loss of charge neutrality after the substitution of Mn 3+ in Ti 4+ sites.These defects can also be related to the distortion observed in Figure 1b by XRD.The smaller crystallite size and the lattice parameter shown in Table 1 for this sample (Mn1) confirm this discussion.In contrast, the high content of Mn in sample Mn8 resulted in the formation of Mn 3+ with small percentage of Mn 2+ (0.81 Å) located on the surface of the catalyst, likely as Mn3O4 or MnO, but not into the structure as Mn1.For this reason, the distortion in Figure 1b decreases for Mn8 having the same 2θ value than Mn0 with similar lattice parameter (Table 1).Figure 3b also confirms the discussion mentioned above.Figure 3b shows the O 1s spectra obtained by XPS.
The deconvolution analysis shows two well defined peaks in all samples located at 528.8 and 530.6 eV, which are respectively attributed to lattice oxygen (Olat) from the perovskite structure or surface segregated oxides and surface adsorbed oxygen (Oads), associated with defect oxides [27], carbonates or hydroxyl species, as well as weakly bonded oxygen adsorbed on the surface [13,26].The Oads/Olat ratio shown in Table 2 demonstrates high Oads in the Mn1 sample, which can be attributed to the structural defects produced by the Mn 3+ /Mn 4+ ratio shown in Table 2 [1].On the other hand, the Mn8 sample shows higher Olat, attributable to manganese oxides segregated on the surface of the catalyst, confirming a lower degree of distortion (Figure 1b) and the formation of Mn 2+ (Figure 3a). Figure 4 shows the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms.All samples have typical type IV isotherm showing a hysteresis loop at high relative pressures, which is associated with capillary condensation representative of mesoporous materials [24][25][26][27][28].This is confirmed by the mean pore size shown in Table 2, where all samples have a pore size in the range of mesopores (2-50 nm).Table 2 also shows the pore volume of approximately 0.12-0.16cm 3 •g −1 and surface areas of above 11 m 2 •g −1 .Figure 4 shows the N 2 adsorption-desorption isotherms.All samples have typical type IV isotherm showing a hysteresis loop at high relative pressures, which is associated with capillary condensation representative of mesoporous materials [24][25][26][27][28].This is confirmed by the mean pore size shown in Table 2, where all samples have a pore size in the range of mesopores (2-50 nm).Table 2 also shows the pore volume of approximately 0.12-0.16cm 3 •g −1 and surface areas of above 11 m 2 •g −1 .
These results are slightly higher than values previously reported for perovskite type catalysts for soot oxidation reactions [8,16,22], which is attributed to the dendritic morphology observed in Figure 2. Based on these results, it is expected that perovskites synthesized in this work can be used as catalysts in the soot combustion reaction.
These results are slightly higher than values previously reported for perovskite type catalysts for soot oxidation reactions [8,16,22], which is attributed to the dendritic morphology observed in Figure 2. Based on these results, it is expected that perovskites synthesized in this work can be used as catalysts in the soot combustion reaction.These results are slightly higher than values previously reported for perovskite type catalysts for soot oxidation reactions [8,16,22], which is attributed to the dendritic morphology observed in Figure 2.
Based on these results, it is expected that perovskites synthesized in this work can be used as catalysts in the soot combustion reaction.Figure 5a shows the DTG profiles obtained during the catalytic decomposition of soot using the catalysts synthesized in this study.This figure shows a clear decrease in the temperature of the maximum peak (T m ) for catalyzed reactions compared with the control, un-catalyzed reaction.The T m of the soot combustion reactions in decreasing order are as follows: uncatalyzed > Mn0 > Mn8 > Mn4 > Mn1.The catalyst Mn1 had the lowest T m at 591 • C, decreasing the temperature more than 100 • C compared with the un-catalyzed sample (700 • C).Notably, the soot model used in this study, carbon Vulcan, has a higher combustion temperature than Printex U.All T m data are shown in Table 3.The highest difference in T m , at approximately 26 • C, occurred between the Mn1 and Mn0 catalysts, and is similar to previous reports, where different doped perovskites were used [16,29,30].In addition, the most effective catalyst tested in this study is that one doped with 1 wt % of Mn (Mn1), which lowered the catalytic combustion of soot to 591 • C.This result is comparable with different perovskites where the T m of soot combustion reached temperatures above 500 • C [9,22,31,32].Table 4 shows a comparison of T m 's for some perovskites, including SrTiO 3 and Cu doped SrTiO 3 prepared by different routes [22].As shown in Table 4, the perovskites synthesized in this work have comparable T m values with previous reports, which is attributed to higher surface area and the dendritic morphology of these catalysts.These characteristics promote increased contact between catalyst and soot particles.These phenomena were previously observed by Lee C. et al. [32] who reported that a perovskite with a three-dimensional fiber network structure can improve the contact among reactants, therefore decreasing the combustion temperature.It is worth mentioning that increasing the amount of Mn leads to an increase in the T m .This is likely due to fewer structural defects in the catalysts as indicated by the O ads /O lat ratio as well as the existence of a reduced species of Mn, such as Mn 2+ in the Mn8 sample.The quantification of the catalytic effect of samples in soot combustion was calculated by the E a using Equation ( 2) and is shown in Figure 5b.A larger slope is observed for Mn0 and un-catalyzed samples indicating their low catalytic activity.As shown in Table 4, the lowest E a is calculated for Mn1, which is associated with the higher O ads /O lat and Mn 3+ /Mn 4+ ratios shown in Table 2 [3].Finally, Figure 5c shows the TGA results of all catalysts synthesized in this work.A loss in mass is clearly observed at low temperatures (<500 • C) for samples Mn0 and Mn8 but not for Mn1, indicating that Mn0 and Mn8 are active at lower temperatures.This behavior can be explained as statement in the literature [13].In the case of Mn8, segregated Mn 3 O 4 promotes the adsorption of oxygen (Figure 3).The adsorbed oxygen starts to reacts with soot at temperatures below 500 • C, and an increment in the mass loss, attributed to the soot combustion, is clearly detected.In contrast, the preservation of the perovskite structure with high Mn 3+ content in Mn1 and Mn4, which correlates with the formation of surface oxygen vacancies, can produce a competing oxidation reaction between soot combustion and the oxidation of Mn 3+ to Mn 4+ , resulting in rapidly filled surface oxygen vacancies and low mass loss (see Figure 5c), as described by Xueting et al. [27].However, at temperatures higher than 500 • C, oxygen migrates from the bulk to the catalyst surface.The Mn1 sample, rich in structural defects (as shown in Figure 3b), is the best catalyst for oxygen transportation via the ion-mobility mechanism [13,27], which promotes the combustion of soot.Mass loss increases dramatically as a consequence.The driving force can be the oxygen gradient produced in the interface between soot-catalyst and the bulk.Figure 6 shows a representative image of the proposed mechanism.At low temperatures, adsorbed oxygen species seems to be the main contributing parameter, as previously reported [13].Mn reductive species segregated as Mn3O4 in the Mn8 sample are able to adsorb and dissociate oxygen from the air to the soot-catalyst interface (blue arrow in Figure 6) which, together with the hydroxyl species desorbed from the surface of the catalyst, drives the mass loss at low temperatures,  Figure 6 shows a representative image of the proposed mechanism.At low temperatures, adsorbed oxygen species seems to be the main contributing parameter, as previously reported [13].Mn reductive species segregated as Mn 3 O 4 in the Mn8 sample are able to adsorb and dissociate oxygen from the air to the soot-catalyst interface (blue arrow in Figure 6) which, together with the hydroxyl species desorbed from the surface of the catalyst, drives the mass loss at low temperatures, as shown in Figure 5c.For Mn1 and Mn4, the existence of Ti 3+ and Mn 3+ are responsible for adsorbing oxygen from the air.By increasing the temperature, oxygen migrates from the bulk to the surface, enhanced by the redox pair Mn 3+ /Mn 4+ and the existence of Ti 3+ /Ti 4+ species (Red arrow in Figure 6).Mn1, with high Mn 3+ content and oxygen vacancies, can transport oxygen from the bulk to the surface and enhance the soot oxidation rate (Green arrow in Figure 6) [13,27].Another possibility causing the behavior observed in Figure 5c is the better dispersion of Mn species on the surface of Mn1 and Mn4 catalysts against Mn8.By increasing the content of Mn in the Mn8 sample, agglomerates of Mn 3 O 4 on the surface of the catalyst decrease the catalytic activity of these samples, as shown in Figure 5a and Table 3. as shown in Figure 5c.For Mn1 and Mn4, the existence of Ti 3+ and Mn 3+ are responsible for adsorbing oxygen from the air.By increasing the temperature, oxygen migrates from the bulk to the surface, enhanced by the redox pair Mn 3+ /Mn 4+ and the existence of Ti 3+ /Ti 4+ species (Red arrow in Figure 6).Mn1, with high Mn 3+ content and oxygen vacancies, can transport oxygen from the bulk to the surface and enhance the soot oxidation rate (Green arrow in Figure 6) [13,27].Another possibility causing the behavior observed in Figure 5c is the better dispersion of Mn species on the surface of Mn1 and Mn4 catalysts against Mn8.By increasing the content of Mn in the Mn8 sample, agglomerates of Mn3O4 on the surface of the catalyst decrease the catalytic activity of these samples, as shown in Figure 5a and Table 3.

Preparation of Catalyst
Doped and undoped samples of SrTiO3 were prepared by the hydrothermal method using titanium butoxide (>97%, Sigma Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) and Sr(NO3)2 (>99%, Sigma Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) as precursors.These reagents were mixed in stoichiometric ratios with 60 mL of 0.2 M NaOH to obtain a homogeneous solution.In the case of doped samples, the required amount of Mn(NO3)2•4H2O (>97%, Sigma Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) to prepare 1, 4, and 8 wt % of the doped metal was added.After mixing for 10 min., the final solution was placed into a Teflon vessel with 100 mL of volume and was hydrothermally treated at 180 °C for 24 h.After the thermal treatment, the solution was removed from the furnace and cooled to room temperature.The resulting precipitate was separated from the solution via decantation and washed gently with distilled water till a neutral pH was achieved.Finally, the powder was dried at 105 °C for 6 h and calcined at 600 °C for 5 h under ambient air with heating and cooling rates of 5 °C•min −1 .

Catalysts Characterization
The phase composition of the perovskites was evaluated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) in a Siemens D-5000 diffractometer (Munich, Germany) with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5418Å) with a scanning and step size of 0.5 s and 0.02°, respectively.The mean crystallite size (ds) of the perovskites was calculated using the Scherrer equation (Equation ( 1)) [24] λ cos (1)

Preparation of Catalyst
Doped and undoped samples of SrTiO 3 were prepared by the hydrothermal method using titanium butoxide (>97%, Sigma Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) and Sr(NO 3 ) 2 (>99%, Sigma Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) as precursors.These reagents were mixed in stoichiometric ratios with 60 mL of 0.2 M NaOH to obtain a homogeneous solution.In the case of doped samples, the required amount of Mn(NO 3 ) 2 •4H 2 O (>97%, Sigma Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) to prepare 1, 4, and 8 wt % of the doped metal was added.After mixing for 10 min., the final solution was placed into a Teflon vessel with 100 mL of volume and was hydrothermally treated at 180 • C for 24 h.After the thermal treatment, the solution was removed from the furnace and cooled to room temperature.The resulting precipitate was separated from the solution via decantation and washed gently with distilled water till a neutral pH was achieved.Finally, the powder was dried at 105 • C for 6 h and calcined at 600 • C for 5 h under ambient air with heating and cooling rates of 5 • C•min −1 .

Catalysts Characterization
The phase composition of the perovskites was evaluated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) in a Siemens D-5000 diffractometer (Munich, Germany) with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5418Å) with a scanning and step size of 0.5 s and 0.02 • , respectively.The mean crystallite size (d s ) of the perovskites was calculated using the Scherrer equation (Equation ( 1)) [24] where d s is the mean crystallite size, k is the shape factor (0.9), λ is the X-ray wavelength (1.54 Å), β is the broadening at half of the maximum intensity (FWHM), and θ is the Bragg angle.The lattice parameters were calculated from the peak (110) using the equation for cubic structure.The morphology, particle size and elemental composition were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM-EDS) 6490 LV JEOL Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).N 2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were carried out at −196 • C, before the analysis, all samples were degassed at 300 • C for 1 h, the surface area was obtained by N 2 physisorption and calculated using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method using a Quantachrome Instruments Auto-sorb 3B equipment (Boynton Beach, FL, USA).X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis (XPS) were performed on a K-Alpha TM + X-ray Spectrophotometer Thermo Scientific Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA) with a monochromatized Al Kα X-ray source (1486.7 eV) and passing energy of 40 eV.C 1s (binding energy 284.8 eV) of formed carbon was used as a reference.XPS spectra were deconvoluted using advantage software Avantage Thermo Scientific and Gaussian-Lorentzian and Shirley background.The content of Mn as doped metal was measured at wavelength of 294.93 nm by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) using Optima 4300 DV, Perkin Elmer Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with AS-90 Autosampler (Waltham, MA, USA).For this measurement 1 g of each catalyst was dissolved in 10 mL of hot sulfuric acid and then diluted to 100 mL with distilled water.

Catalytic Test
The catalytic assays for the soot oxidation reaction were carried out by mixing catalyst with carbon Vulcan (XC72R Cabot Corp., Boston, MA, USA), which was used as a soot model, in a 9:1 mass ratio.These reactants were previously mixed during 10 min.in an agate mortar using acetone as the organic solvent to ensure tight contact at the soot-catalyst inerface.Then, each mixture was placed in an alumina crucible for catalytic experiments.All experiments were carried out by DTA-DSC-TGA (STA 6000 Perkin Elmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) from room temperature to 850 • C at 5 • C/min with a flow rate of 50 mL/min of dry air.The temperature of maximal soot combustion, determined by DTG, in addition with the weight loss, determined by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), were used to evaluate the catalytic performance.In addition, carbon mixed with inert material (SiO 2 ), with the same mass ratio (9:1), was also measured as a reference, un-catalyzed sample.Catalytic activity was determined by calculating the activation energy using the Kissinger equation [33], shown in Equation ( 2) ln Φ where Φ is the heating rate (5, 10, 20 or 40 K•min −1 ); T p is the temperature in K at the maximum peak observed by DSC analysis; R is the universal gas constant in J•mol −1 •K −1 ; and C corresponds to an experimental constant which is a function of the pre-exponential factor of the crystallization process K 0 , the activation energy and the universal gas constant R.

Conclusions
A series of Mn-doped SrTiO 3 perovskites with varying ratios of Mn and distinct structures and dendritic morphologies were synthesized by the hydrothermal method.The incorporation of Mn into the structure was demonstrated for samples doped with Mn ≤ 4 wt % with Mn 4+ and Mn 3+ species in Ti sites.Mn 3+ in the structure promotes the oxygen surface adsorbed species.However, by increasing the amount of the metal dopant, the formation of manganese oxides segregated on the surface, promoted the existence of O lat .These segregated oxides lead to a decrease in the catalytic activity, which is attributed to the lower structural defects and reductive Mn 2+ species on the surface of this sample.The catalyst with the lowest T m and E a is the one doped by 1 wt % of Mn, which is attributed to the Mn 3+ /Mn 4+ ratio characteristic of this sample, promoting the formation of oxygen surface adsorbed species caused by the presence of structural defects which also contribute to the mobility of the oxygen bulk to the surface as temperatures above the 500 • C.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.(a) X-ray diffractograms and (b) zoom-in of the peak located at 32.45 • of catalysts with different contents of Mn synthesized in this work by hydrothermal method and calcined at 600 • C for 5 h.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. (a) Mn0 and (b) Mn4 SEM images of catalysts with dendritic morphology; (c) Mn4 and (d) Mn0 EDS spectra of samples synthesized in this work by hydrothermal method and calcined at 600 °C for 5 h.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. (a) Mn0 and (b) Mn4 SEM images of catalysts with dendritic morphology; (c) Mn4 and (d) Mn0 EDS spectra of samples synthesized in this work by hydrothermal method and calcined at 600 • C for 5 h.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. XPS spectra of catalysts with different contents of Mn synthesized in this work by hydrothermal method and calcined at 600 °C for 5 h (a) Mn 2p 3/2 (b) O 1s.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. XPS spectra of catalysts with different contents of Mn synthesized in this work by hydrothermal method and calcined at 600 • C for 5 h (a) Mn 2p 3/2 (b) O 1s.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. XPS spectra of catalysts with different contents of Mn synthesized in this work by hydrothermal method and calcined at 600 °C for 5 h (a) Mn 2p 3/2 (b) O 1s.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Soot catalytic reaction using catalysts synthesized in this work with different contents of Mn.(a) DTG; (b) activation energy by Kissinger method; and (c) TGA analysis.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Soot catalytic reaction using catalysts synthesized in this work with different contents of Mn.(a) DTG; (b) activation energy by Kissinger method; and (c) TGA analysis.

Table 1 .
[17]XRD card mentioned above.The ICP results shown in Table1confirm the total content of Mn in each sample, which were very close to the theoretical values.From these results, it is feasible to deduce that structural distortion is mainly produced at lower amounts of Mn dopant[17].Crystallite size calculated by XRD and content of Mn obtained by ICP analysis of catalysts synthesized in this work.

Table 1 .
Crystallite size calculated by XRD and content of Mn obtained by ICP analysis of catalysts synthesized in this work.

Table 2 .
Textural and superficial properties of catalysts synthesized in this work.

Table 2 .
Textural and superficial properties of catalysts synthesized in this work.

lat Mn 3+ /Mn 4+
* This value corresponds to the Mn 3+ /Mn 2+ ratio according to results shown in Figure3a.Catalysts 2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 11

Table 2 .
Textural and superficial properties of catalysts synthesized in this work.

Olat Mn 3+ /Mn 4+
Figure 4. N 2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of samples with different contents of Mn synthesized in this work by hydrothermal method and calcined at 600 • C for 5 h.

Table 3 .
T m and activation energy for the catalysts synthesized in this work during the soot catalytic reaction.

Table 4 .
Comparative of soot catalytic combustion temperature with previous reports using carbon Vulcan as soot model.

Table 4 .
Comparative of soot catalytic combustion temperature with previous reports using carbon Vulcan as soot model.