Cloning, Expression and Characterization of a Novel Fructosyltransferase from Aspergillus Oryzae Zz-01 for the Synthesis of Sucrose 6-acetate

A 1521 bp gene encoding for a novel fructosyltransferase from Aspergillus oryzae ZZ-01 (AoFT) has been amplified by RACE and TAIL PCR, and functionally overexpressed in Escherichia coli BL 21-CodonPlus (DE3)-RIL. The recombinant A. oryzae ZZ-01 fructosyltransferases (r-AoFT) was purified to homogeneity after Ni-NTA affinity and Superdex-200 gel filtration chromatography. SDS-PAGE analysis of the purified r-AoFT revealed a single protein band with an apparent molecular mass of 60.0 kDa. The r-AoFT enzyme exhibited its optimal activity at 55 ˝ C and pH 5.5, and maintained about 63% of its activity even after 60 min of treatment at 60 ˝ C. The addition of Mg 2+ led to an increase in the activity of r-AoFT, whereas Zn 2+ , Cu 2+ and Ni 2+ led to a reduction in its activity. Six site-directed mutants of r-AoFT (D39A, D164A, E216A, N38L, S99A and Y282A) were constructed and characterized biochemically. The N38L, S99A and Y282A mutants had lower K m and higher V max values than the wild-type enzyme, highlighting their higher binding affinity for the substrates. These results therefore suggest that r-AoFT could be used for the enzymatic synthesis of Suc6A from sucrose and glucose 6-acetate.


Introduction
Sucrose esters, which consist of a hydrophilic sucrose group and one to eight lipophilic fatty acid groups, are used in a wide variety of applications in the food, agricultural, cosmetic, detergent and pharmaceutical industries [1,2].Sucrose 6-acetate (Suc6A) is a short-chain monoester and an important intermediate in the synthesis of sucralose, which is one of the sweetest sweeteners reported to date [3].There are currently two main methods available for the synthesis of Suc6A, including chemical and enzymatic protocols.The traditional chemical procedure for the synthesis of Suc6A involves a complicated process that requires harsh separation techniques, which leads to several key limitations, including high energy consumption, browning of the products and the production of toxic byproducts [4,5].Recent developments in the use of biological methods to affect specific chemical reactions have resulted in the development of enzymes for the synthesis of Suc6A.The enzymatic synthesis of Suc6A has several critical advantages over chemical synthesis in terms of providing higher specificity and efficiency, which could help to alleviate some of the aforementioned problems [6,7].
Fructosyltransferases (FTases, E.C. 2.4.1.9)can be used to catalyze the cleavage of the β-(1,2)-glycosidic linkages between glucose and fructose units, as well as the transfer of the resulting fructosyl group from one sucrose unit to another [8][9][10].FTase coding genes have been isolated from several species, including plants [11][12][13], fungi [1,8,14,15] and bacteria [16][17][18], where they encode for extra-or intracellular FTases representing the eight highly conserved motifs in the glycoside hydrolases belonging to glycoside hydrolase families 32 (GH32) and 68 (GH68) [1,19].The majority of the ftase genes reported to date have been isolated from Aspergillus strains of fungi, although a recent database mining analysis identified ftase-related sequences in the genomes of Gibberella zeae, Magna porthe grisea and Ustilago maydis [19].The Aspergillus genes become increasingly homogeneous at sizes in the range of 1.6-2.2kb and encode for enzymes of about 600 amino acids in length [8,[19][20][21].In bacteria, the ftase genes vary in size from 1.2 kb in Thermotoga maritima [22] up to 4.4 kb in Leuconostoc citreum [23], producing enzymes containing 432 and 1466 amino acids, respectively.In plants, the fructooligosaccharide (FOS)-related genes and enzymes contain approximately 2.0 kb and 680 amino acids, respectively [11,24,25].Although several studies have been conducted to date pertaining to the computational analysis of these sequences, these studies have focused on a limited number of organisms [26,27].The identification of new FTase-producing microorganisms with higher transfructosylation activity and the characterization of new FTase genes and enzymes are therefore highly desired.
To date, most reports in the literature on the enzymatic synthesis of Suc6A have focused predominantly on lipases, such as Candida rugosa lipase [7], lipozyme TLIM [8], lipase P Amano (Pseudomonas spp.) [28] and lipase TLL (Thermomyces lanuginosus) [29].Only one fructosyltransferase from Aureobasidium pullulans has been reported to date to catalyze the synthesis of Suc6A from glucose 6-acetate and sucrose [30].We previously reported the use of Aspergillus oryzae ZZ-01 fructosyltransferase (AoFT) to synthesize Suc6A using glucose 6-acetate (Glu6A) and sucrose as substrates [9,10].However, the industrial application of AoFT from wild-type A. oryzae ZZ-01 has been limited by low yields, and it is therefore necessary to isolate and express the AoFT gene in a bacterial or fungal expression system to improve its productivity.In this study, we describe the molecular cloning and expression of the AoFT gene of A. oryzae ZZ-01 in E. coli, as well as the purification of recombinant AoFT (r-AoFT).The enzymatic properties of the r-AoFT enzyme were fully characterized, including the structural modeling and experimental analysis of its catalytic triad.

Cloning and Sequence Analysis of the aoft Gene
The aoft fructosyltransferase gene from Aspergillus oryzae ZZ-01 was successfully cloned by RACE and TAIL PCR.The entire aoft gene had an open reading frame of 1578 bp encoding 525 amino acid residues with a putative signal sequence of 19 amino acids.The mature protein was 506 amino acid residues in length and had a calculated molecular mass of 55.4 kDa and a theoretical pI of 4.79.Similar results were observed for the other homologs from A. oryzae N74 and A. oryzae RIB40.Notably, the fructosyltransferase AoFT showed six potential N-glycosylation sites (N59, N107, N204, N261, N399 and N437) and six potential O-glycosylation sites (T324, T441, T443, T444, T445 and T516) (Supplementary Figure S1) [1,31].It was deduced that the amino acid sequence of AoFT showed sequence identities of 98%, 96% and 90% with the fructosyltransferases from A. oryzae N74 (GU145136), A. oryzae RIB40 (XM_001823193) and A. nomius NRRL 13137 (XM_015553884).The results of our secondary structure prediction suggested that r-AoFT consist of a large number of β-sheets (48.1% of the total sequence) and three α-helices (2.3% of the total sequence) (Supplementary Figure S1).Multiple sequence alignment analysis revealed that r-AoFT contained a typical catalytic triad composed of Asp39-Asp164-Glu216, as well as two conserved motifs (FRDPXVFW and CXXXECPX) containing the active site residue [27,31].

Structural Model of r-AoFT
A 3D model structure of r-AoFT was predicted based on the crystal of the fructofuranosidase from Schwanniomyces occidentalis (PDB: 3u75.1A) using the Swiss-Model server.The quality of our predicted r-AoFT model was assessed using PROCHECK analysis and WHAT IF program.Ramachdarn plot indicated (Supplementary Figure S2) that 90.1% residues in the most favored region, 8.5% in the additional allowed region and 1.4% in the disallowed region.The predicted model was subjected to energy minimization using GROMOS96 implemented via Swiss-pdb viewer.The energy of the final model was ´7280.54KJ/mol, which evaluated the thermodynamic stability of the 3D model.Bond lengths, bond angles and torsion angles of the predicted r-AoFT model were evaluated using the WHAT IF program.The bond lengths (RMS z-score of 0.92) and bond angles (RMS z-score of 1.15) were found to deviate normally from standard values (a RMS z-score for a normally restrained data set is expected to be around 1.0.),respectively.The quality of our predicted r-AoFT model was assessed using the Ramachandran plot and found to be acceptable.The structure of the r-AoFT model consisted of two domains with an N-terminal catalytic domain containing a five-fold β-propeller architecture (residues 11-342) linked to a C-terminal β-sandwich-like domain (residues 351-511) (Figure 1A).Although we observed considerable differences in the primary structures and properties of r-AoFT and its homologs, the 3D structure of r-AoFT shared a similar core topology to most of the glycoside hydrolases belonging to glycoside hydrolase families 32 (GH32) 68 (GH68) [32,33].The active site residue (Asp39) was located in the N-terminal fivefold β-propeller domain, where it could interact with the Gln57, Ser99 and Tyr282 residues located deep inside the central pocket of the β-propeller domain [1,31].Several hydrogen bonding interactions were observed inside this active-site pocket between Asp39-Gln57, Asp39-Ser99, Ser99-Asp164 and Glu216-Tyr282 (Figure 1B).were found to deviate normally from standard values (a RMS z-score for a normally restrained data set is expected to be around 1.0.),respectively.The quality of our predicted r-AoFT model was assessed using the Ramachandran plot and found to be acceptable.The structure of the r-AoFT model consisted of two domains with an N-terminal catalytic domain containing a five-fold β-propeller architecture (residues 11-342) linked to a C-terminal β-sandwich-like domain (residues 351-511) (Figure 1A).Although we observed considerable differences in the primary structures and properties of r-AoFT and its homologs, the 3D structure of r-AoFT shared a similar core topology to most of the glycoside hydrolases belonging to glycoside hydrolase families 32 (GH32) 68 (GH68) [32,33].The active site residue (Asp39) was located in the N-terminal fivefold β-propeller domain, where it could interact with the Gln57, Ser99 and Tyr282 residues located deep inside the central pocket of the βpropeller domain [1,31].Several hydrogen bonding interactions were observed inside this active-site pocket between Asp39-Gln57, Asp39-Ser99, Ser99-Asp164 and Glu216-Tyr282 (Figure 1B).

Expression and Purification of r-AoFT
A pET15b-aoft plasmid was constructed for the wild-type enzyme of AoFT to evaluate the biochemical properties of r-AoFT.The r-AoFT enzyme was expressed in E. coli as the His6-r-AoFT fusion protein (calculated to be a 57.4 kDa polypeptide) and purified by Ni-NTA affinity and Superdex-200 gel filtration chromatography.The relative molecular mass of the His6 fusion enzyme r-AoFT was determined to be approximately 60 kDa by SDS-PAGE (Figure 2).The process used for the purification of the r-AoFT is summarized in Table 1.The enzyme was purified 3.5-fold with a yield of 34.5% and a specific activity of 38.0 U/mg, which was 38.0 times higher that of the native AoFT enzyme from A. oryzae ZZ-01 [10].

Expression and Purification of r-AoFT
A pET15b-aoft plasmid was constructed for the wild-type enzyme of AoFT to evaluate the biochemical properties of r-AoFT.The r-AoFT enzyme was expressed in E. coli as the His6-r-AoFT fusion protein (calculated to be a 57.4 kDa polypeptide) and purified by Ni-NTA affinity and Superdex-200 gel filtration chromatography.The relative molecular mass of the His6 fusion enzyme r-AoFT was determined to be approximately 60 kDa by SDS-PAGE (Figure 2).The process used for the purification of the r-AoFT is summarized in Table 1.The enzyme was purified 3.5-fold with a yield of 34.5% and a specific activity of 38.0 U/mg, which was 38.0 times higher that of the native AoFT enzyme from A. oryzae ZZ-01 [10].

Effects of Temperature and pH on Enzyme Activity
The effects of the temperature and the pH on the transfructosylation activity were studied at temperature and pH values in the ranges of 30-80 °C and 3.5-8.0,respectively, using sucrose and glucose 6-acetate as the substrates (Figure 3A,B).The results revealed that the optimum temperature for the activity of r-AoFT was 55 °C, which is higher than that of the native AoFT enzyme from A. oryzae ZZ-01 [10], as well as several other recombinant fructosyltransferases [8,12,13,15,[21][22][23].The optimum pH was for the activity of r-AoFT was determined to be 5.5, with the enzyme showing more than half of its maximal activity at pH values in the range of 4.5-7.0.The thermostability of r-AoFT was evaluated at 50, 55 and 60 °C with increasing incubation times of up to 240 min.The activity of the enzyme remained largely unchanged after incubation at 50 °C for at least 240 min, whereas incubation at 60 °C for 60 min led to a reduction in the maximum activity of the enzyme of approximately 35% (Figure 4).In conclusion, the transfructosylation activity of the r-AoFT enzyme displayed a greater tolerance towards higher temperatures than the wild-type enzyme.

Effects of Temperature and pH on Enzyme Activity
The effects of the temperature and the pH on the transfructosylation activity were studied at temperature and pH values in the ranges of 30-80 ˝C and 3.5-8.0,respectively, using sucrose and glucose 6-acetate as the substrates (Figure 3A,B).The results revealed that the optimum temperature for the activity of r-AoFT was 55 ˝C, which is higher than that of the native AoFT enzyme from A. oryzae ZZ-01 [10], as well as several other recombinant fructosyltransferases [8,12,13,15,[21][22][23].The optimum pH was for the activity of r-AoFT was determined to be 5.5, with the enzyme showing more than half of its maximal activity at pH values in the range of 4.5-7.0.The thermostability of r-AoFT was evaluated at 50, 55 and 60 ˝C with increasing incubation times of up to 240 min.The activity of the enzyme remained largely unchanged after incubation at 50 ˝C for at least 240 min, whereas incubation at 60 ˝C for 60 min led to a reduction in the maximum activity of the enzyme of approximately 35% (Figure 4).In conclusion, the transfructosylation activity of the r-AoFT enzyme displayed a greater tolerance towards higher temperatures than the wild-type enzyme.

Effects of Temperature and pH on Enzyme Activity
The effects of the temperature and the pH on the transfructosylation activity were studied at temperature and pH values in the ranges of 30-80 °C and 3.5-8.0,respectively, using sucrose and glucose 6-acetate as the substrates (Figure 3A,B).The results revealed that the optimum temperature for the activity of r-AoFT was 55 °C, which is higher than that of the native AoFT enzyme from A. oryzae ZZ-01 [10], as well as several other recombinant fructosyltransferases [8,12,13,15,[21][22][23].The optimum pH was for the activity of r-AoFT was determined to be 5.5, with the enzyme showing more than half of its maximal activity at pH values in the range of 4.5-7.0.The thermostability of r-AoFT was evaluated at 50, 55 and 60 °C with increasing incubation times of up to 240 min.The activity of the enzyme remained largely unchanged after incubation at 50 °C for at least 240 min, whereas incubation at 60 °C for 60 min led to a reduction in the maximum activity of the enzyme of approximately 35% (Figure 4).In conclusion, the transfructosylation activity of the r-AoFT enzyme displayed a greater tolerance towards higher temperatures than the wild-type enzyme.

Effects of Different Metal Ions, Organic Solvents and Detergents on the Enzymatic Activity of r-AoFT
Some biocatalysts use metal ions, such as Mg 2+ , Zn 2+ and Mn 2+ , as co-factors for their enzymatic activities [34].Metal ions can also induce structural changes that can lead to the denaturation of the enzyme.In this study, we investigated the effects of 5 mM solutions of various metal ions, including Ca 2+ , Mn 2+ , Zn 2+ , Mg 2+ , Cu 2+ , Fe 2+ , Ni 2+ and Co 2+ ions on the enzymatic activity of the r-AoFT enzyme using a standard transfructosylation activity assay.The results revealed that the transfructosylation activity of r-AoFT was not significantly affected by the addition of Ca 2+ , Mn 2+ , Fe 2+ or Co 2+ ions.The transfructosylation activity was also unaffected by the addition of the chelating reagent EDTA, indicating that this enzyme was not a metalloprotein.The addition of Mg 2+ ions led to a 35% increase in the activity of r-AoFT, whereas the addition of Zn 2+ , Cu 2+ or Ni 2+ led to a reduction in the activity of the enzyme by 30%, 13% or 8%, respectively (Table 2).As shown in Table 3, the r-AoFT enzyme retained more than 75% of its maximum activity following its incubation with methanol, ethanol, acetone, chloroform, toluene, DMF and DMSO at 50% (v/v).The addition of Tween 20 or Triton-X 100 led to a slight increase in the transfructosylation activity of r-AoFT, whereas the addition of SDS (1%) or urea (4 M) led to a significant reduction in the activity of r-AoFT to less than 30% of its optimal value.The addition of DDT had no discernible impact on the transfructosylation activity of r-AoFT.Taken together, these results have demonstrated that r-AoFT is stable towards various organic solvents, with this material showing similar stability to the native AoFT from A. oryzae ZZ-01 [10].

Effects of Different Metal Ions, Organic Solvents and Detergents on the Enzymatic Activity of r-AoFT
Some biocatalysts use metal ions, such as Mg 2+ , Zn 2+ and Mn 2+ , as co-factors for their enzymatic activities [34].Metal ions can also induce structural changes that can lead to the denaturation of the enzyme.In this study, we investigated the effects of 5 mM solutions of various metal ions, including Ca 2+ , Mn 2+ , Zn 2+ , Mg 2+ , Cu 2+ , Fe 2+ , Ni 2+ and Co 2+ ions on the enzymatic activity of the r-AoFT enzyme using a standard transfructosylation activity assay.The results revealed that the transfructosylation activity of r-AoFT was not significantly affected by the addition of Ca 2+ , Mn 2+ , Fe 2+ or Co 2+ ions.The transfructosylation activity was also unaffected by the addition of the chelating reagent EDTA, indicating that this enzyme was not a metalloprotein.The addition of Mg 2+ ions led to a 35% increase in the activity of r-AoFT, whereas the addition of Zn 2+ , Cu 2+ or Ni 2+ led to a reduction in the activity of the enzyme by 30%, 13% or 8%, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2. Effect of various metals and EDTA on the synthesis activity of Suc6A of r-AoFT a .
As shown in Table 3, the r-AoFT enzyme retained more than 75% of its maximum activity following its incubation with methanol, ethanol, acetone, chloroform, toluene, DMF and DMSO at 50% (v/v).The addition of Tween 20 or Triton-X 100 led to a slight increase in the transfructosylation activity of r-AoFT, whereas the addition of SDS (1%) or urea (4 M) led to a significant reduction in the activity of r-AoFT to less than 30% of its optimal value.The addition of DDT had no discernible impact on the transfructosylation activity of r-AoFT.Taken together, these results have demonstrated that r-AoFT is stable towards various organic solvents, with this material showing similar stability to the native AoFT from A. oryzae ZZ-01 [10].a Assay was performed under optimum conditions and the values are means of three independent experiments.

Identification of Crucial Amino Acid Residue for r-AoFT Activity
The sequence alignment of the representative r-AoFT proteins and their homologs revealed two conserved regions, including FRDPXVFW and CXXXECPX [1,31].Although it has been predicted that the conserved acidic residues of r-AoFT could play a significant role in its catalytic activity, there have been no experimental data reported to date to confirm this speculation.To determine the functions of these motifs, we performed several site-directed mutagenesis experiments on r-AoFT.The vectors required to generate the D39A, D164A, E216A, N38L, S99A and Y282A mutants were constructed using standard techniques, and the resulting mutant proteins were expressed in E. coli.The proteins were then purified using a previously reported procedure for the purification of the wild-type protein [10] to give high quality protein products (Figure 2).The enzymatic properties of the wild-type and mutant enzymes were investigated in detail and the results are summarized in Table 4.The mutation of several predicted catalytic residues, including Asp39, Asp164 and Glu216 to alanine led to a complete loss of catalytic activity.This result therefore indicated that the Asp39, Asp164 and Glu216 residues in the catalytic site of r-AoFT are critical to its transfructosylation activity.Fructosyltransferases operate via a retaining catalytic mechanism, with the Asp39, Asp164 and Glu216 residues acting as a nucleophile, transition-state stabilizer and general acid/base catalyst, respectively.These residues also play a critical role in the binding of the terminal substrate and the catalytic reaction [31,35].Compared with the wild type enzyme, the N38L, S99A and Y282A mutant enzymes had lower K m and higher V max values, which indicated that they were exhibiting higher binding affinity towards the substrates than the wild type r-AoFT enzyme [36].Hydrophobic interactions can affect the stability, folding and activity of a protein [37,38].The results for the N38L, S99A and Y282A mutants revealed that asparagine, serine and tyrosine were acting as hydrophilic residues, whereas alanine and leucine were acting as hydrophobic residues.It was envisaged that the addition of hydrophobic amino acids Several site-directed mutants, including D39A, D164A, E216A, N38L, S99A and Y282A, were constructed using the overlapping PCR method [39].The upper fragment was amplified using the forward primer of the wild-type r-AoFT and a site-specific downstream primer (Supplementary Table S2), and the lower fragment was amplified using a site-specific upstream primer (Supplementary Table S2) and the reverse primer of the wild-type r-AoFT.After amplification by PCR, the full-length fragment of each mutants was digested with NdeI and SalI and cloned back into pET15b.DNA sequencing was performed to confirm that no unintended mutations had been introduced during the PCR process.

Sequence Analysis
The homologous sequence and conserved domain were identified using the Blastp software provided by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).

Expression and Purification of Recombinant Fructosyltransferase r-AoFT
The recombinant plasmid pET15b-aoft was transformed into host E. coli BL21-CodonPlus (DE3)-RIL and the transformed cells were grown in LB medium at 37 ˝C.When the OD600 value reached 0.5, gene expression was induced by the addition of 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-Dthiogalactopyranoside (IPTG).After a further 4 h of growth at 37 ˝C, the cells were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl) and disrupted by sonication.The soluble fraction was precipitated with ammonium sulfate (75%) and the precipitate was suspended in buffer A. The sample was subsequently loaded onto a Ni 2+ -NTA agarose column (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), which was washed with a buffer containing 20 mM imidazole, before being eluted with elution buffer containing 300 mM imidazole to collect the enzymes.For purification by gel filtration, the samples were dialyzed in buffer A and loaded onto a Superdex 200 gel filtration column (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK), which was equilibrated in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl buffer (pH 8.0) at 1 mL/min.The site-directed mutants (D39A, D164A, E216A, N38L, S99A and Y282A) were expressed and purified following the procedure for the wild-type r-AoFT protein.The protein concentration was determined according to the Bradford method.

Enzymatic Activity Assay
The standard reaction mixture (1 mL) consisting of 0.1 M glucose 6-acetate (44 mg), 0.1 M sucrose (34 mg), 100 µL of 50 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.5) and 20 µg of purified enzyme.The resulting mixtures were then incubated at 55 ˝C for 24 h with constant shaking at 200 rpm.The resulting solutions were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography using an Xbridge Amide column (4.6 ˆ250 mm, 3.5 µm, Waters, USA) , as described previously [9,10].Samples were eluted isocratically with a 3:1 (v/v) mixture of acetonitrile and water at a flow rate of 1 mL/min.One unit of the transfructosylation activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of 1 µmol glucose 6-acetate per min.Measurements were corrected for background hydrolysis of the substrate in the absence of the enzyme.
minimization using GROMOS96 implemented via Swiss-pdb viewer.The energy of the final model was −7280.54KJ/mol, which evaluated the thermodynamic stability of the 3D model.Bond lengths, bond angles and torsion angles of the predicted r-AoFT model were evaluated using the WHAT IF program.The bond lengths (RMS z-score of 0.92) and bond angles (RMS z-score of 1.15)

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.The predicted 3D structure and active sites of the r-AoFT.(A) The overall structure of r-AoFT consists of a N-terminal fivefold β-propeller domain and a β-propeller domain.The active sites Asp39, Asp164, and Glu 216 are shown in different colors; (B) The hydrogen bonds with numbering of residues interacting with active sites of r-AoFT.The corresponding distances are given in Å.The model was generated with the threading program Phyre using the fructofuranosidase from Schwanniomyces occidentalis (PDB: 3u75.1A) as the template.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.The predicted 3D structure and active sites of the r-AoFT.(A) The overall structure of r-AoFT consists of a N-terminal fivefold β-propeller domain and a β-propeller domain.The active sites Asp39, Asp164, and Glu 216 are shown in different colors; (B) The hydrogen bonds with numbering of residues interacting with active sites of r-AoFT.The corresponding distances are given in Å.The model was generated with the threading program Phyre using the fructofuranosidase from Schwanniomyces occidentalis (PDB: 3u75.1A) as the template.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Temperature optima (A) and pH optima of the r-AoFT(B).(A) Temperature optima of r-AoFT was determined with sucrose and glucose 6-acetate as substrates in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) at temperatures ranging from 30 °C to 80 °C; (B) pH optima of the enzyme at pHs ranging from 3.5 to 8.0 was measured for 24 h at 55 °C.The buffers used were 50 mM of sodium citrate

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Temperature optima (A) and pH optima of the r-AoFT(B).(A) Temperature optima of r-AoFT was determined with sucrose and glucose 6-acetate as substrates in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) at temperatures ranging from 30 °C to 80 °C; (B) pH optima of the enzyme at pHs ranging from 3.5 to 8.0 was measured for 24 h at 55 °C.The buffers used were 50 mM of sodium citrate

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Temperature optima (A) and pH optima of the r-AoFT(B).(A) Temperature optima of r-AoFT was determined with sucrose and glucose 6-acetate as substrates in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) at temperatures ranging from 30 ˝C to 80 ˝C; (B) pH optima of the enzyme at pHs ranging from 3.5 to 8.0 was measured for 24 h at 55 ˝C.The buffers used were 50 mM of sodium citrate (pH 3.5 to 4.0), sodium acetate (pH 4.5 to 6.0), and sodium phosphate (pH 6.5 to 8.0).The values are means of three independent experiments.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Thermostability of r-AoFT.The residual enzyme activity was measured after incubation of the purified enzyme at 50 °C (boxes), 55 °C (diamonds), and 60 °C (triangles), respectively.The values are means of three independent experiments.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Thermostability of r-AoFT.The residual enzyme activity was measured after incubation of the purified enzyme at 50 ˝C (boxes), 55 ˝C (diamonds), and 60 ˝C (triangles), respectively.The values are means of three independent experiments.

Table 2 .
Effect of various metals and EDTA on the synthesis activity of Suc6A of r-AoFT a .
a Assay was performed under optimum conditions and the values are means of three independent experiments.

Table 3 .
Effect of organic solvents and detergents on the synthesis activity of Suc6A of r-AoFT a .

Table 4 .
Comparison of transfructosylation activity of the wild type r-AoFT and key amino acid mutants.