Hydrogen Production by Ethanol Steam Reforming ( ESR ) over CeO 2 Supported Transition Metal ( Fe , Co , Ni , Cu ) Catalysts : Insight into the Structure-Activity Relationship

The aim of the present work was to investigate steam reforming of ethanol with regard to H2 production over transition metal catalysts supported on CeO2. Various parameters concerning the effect of temperature (400–800  ̋C), steam-to-carbon (S/C) feed ratio (0.5, 1.5, 3, 6), metal entity (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) and metal loading (15–30 wt.%) on the catalytic performance, were thoroughly studied. The optimal performance was obtained for the 20 wt.% Co/CeO2 catalyst, achieving a H2 yield of up to 66% at 400  ̋C. In addition, the Co/CeO2 catalyst demonstrated excellent stability performance in the whole examined temperature range of 400–800  ̋C. In contrast, a notable stability degradation, especially at low temperatures, was observed for Ni-, Cu-, and Fe-based catalysts, ascribed mainly to carbon deposition. An extensive characterization study, involving N2 adsorption-desorption (BET), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM/EDS), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), and Temperature Programmed Reduction (H2-TPR) was undertaken to gain insight into the structure-activity correlation. The excellent reforming performance of Co/CeO2 catalysts could be attributed to their intrinsic reactivity towards ethanol reforming in combination to their high surface oxygen concentration, which hinders the deposition of carbonaceous species.


Introduction
Energy is a vital element in our everyday lives, mostly generated, however, from fossil fuels.Furthermore, our continuous dependence on fossil fuels is strongly coupled with natural resource depletion and serious environmental implications, such as greenhouse effect, stratospheric ozone depletion, photochemical smog, etc.Therefore, the need for renewable energy is becoming ever more urgent.In view of this fact, solar, wind, and biomass have become promising renewable energy sources (RES).Although significant technological progress has been accomplished in their efficient energy conversion, their share in the world energy mix is limited due to their intermittent character and site-dependence.On the other hand, hydrogen has been acknowledged as an ideal energy currency for the oxidation of deposited carbonaceous fragments, thus protecting the catalyst surface from poisoning [33][34][35][36].In addition, mobile oxygen can activate water, with regard to the formation of hydroxyl groups, resulting in higher ESR efficiency [25,33].In a comprehensive study by Xu et al. [25], utilizing both in situ and ex situ characterization techniques it was revealed that metallic Ni and Ce(III) entities were the active components under ESR conditions.Ce(III) facilitates the decomposition of H 2 O to -OH groups, which are essential for the transformation of C x H y O z intermediates to CO 2 and H 2 O, whereas Ni promotes the adsorption of ethanol and dissociation of C-C bonds.Moreover, strong Ni-ceria interactions perturb the electronic and chemical properties of Ni ad-atoms, resulting in an inferior ability of Ni with regard to CO methanation [26,27].
In the light of the above aspects, the present manuscript aims to comparatively explore ESR performance over different CeO 2 -supported transition metal (Ni, Fe, Cu, Co) catalysts.The effect of several operation parameters, related to reaction temperature (400-800 ˝C), time on stream (24 h), S/C feed ratio (0.5, 1. 5,3,6), and metal loading (15-30 wt.%) on the activity and stability performance is systematically examined.Furthermore, an extensive characterization study-N 2 adsorption-desorption (BET), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM/EDX), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), and Temperature Programmed Reduction (H 2 -TPR)-was carried out to attain a possible structure-activity relationship.Although recent efforts on ESR are focusing to develop efficient catalysts with low metal contents (e.g., [45,46]), relatively high metal loadings (15-30 wt.%) are employed in the present study, motivated by the potential application of these materials as anodic electrodes in internal reforming ethanol fed SOFCs.

Textural Characterization (BET Analysis)
Table 1 presents the textural characteristics (surface area, pore volume, pore diameter) of as prepared catalysts.It is obvious that the addition of transition metals to the ceria carrier has a detrimental effect on the resulted BET area, which, in general, is exacerbated upon increasing the metal content.However, the decrease of BET area upon increasing the cobalt content is not monotonic.The latter can be attributed to the different crystallite size of Co 3 O 4 and CeO 2 phases in Co/CeO 2 catalysts, as determined by XRD analysis presented in the sequence.The size of Co 3 O 4 is about 3-fold higher than CeO 2 indicating the segregation of cobalt species over the catalyst surface (Table 2).Thus, a significant decrease of bare ceria area (71.5 m 2 /g) is expected upon increasing Co loading, due to the blockage of ceria pores.However, this decrease could not be monotonic, since above a certain Co content the formation of large Co 3 O 4 particles hampers the dispersion of Co 3 O 4 entities into CeO 2 pores and consequently any further decrease of BET area.The same trend was observed upon increasing Cu content in Cu/CeO 2 catalysts [47].
Regarding the M/CeO 2 catalysts with a constant metal loading (20 wt.%), Ni-and Fe-based catalysts possess the higher BET area (~57 m 2 /g), while the Cu-and Co-based samples exhibited lower values of surface area, i.e., 44.6 and 33.4 m 2 /g, respectively.These variations in the textural characteristics could be related with the different crystallite size of the metal oxides formed in each case, as is discussed later.Figure 1A depicts the XRD spectra of M/CeO 2 catalysts, whereas Figure 1B presents the corresponding spectra of Co-based catalysts of different metal loading.Table 2 lists the phases that were detected for each sample, the corresponding structure, and approximate crystallite size as determined by Scherrer analysis.All metals crystallized in the form of oxides, i.e., iron as Fe 2 O 3 , cobalt as Co 3 O 4 , nickel as NiO, and copper as CuO, with their average particle size following the order: CuO > Co 3 O 4 > Fe 2 O 3 > NiO (Table 2).Regarding CeO 2 crystallites their size increases with the decrease of the corresponding size of the metal oxide phase.Concerning the Co-based catalysts of different metal content, cobalt is again presented in the form of oxide (Co 3 O 4 ), regardless of the Co loading.The crystallite size of CeO 2 remains almost constant upon increasing the Co content.Additionally, the size of Co 3 O 4 phase is increased from 30.8 to 37.7 nm with the increment of Co content from 15 to 20 wt.%.However, no further increase was observed for higher Co loadings, confirming the stabilization of BET area values above a certain Co loading.In the Cu/CeO2 sample the overlapping peaks at 100-300 °C temperature interval are assigned to Cu oxide species reduction along with the surface oxygen reduction [48][49][50][51][52]. Specifically, the peak at 133 °C is attributed to the reduction of Cu ions in close proximity to CeO2, while, the features at 215 °C and 267 °C are assigned to Cu entities not closely associated with ceria [52].
In the Co/CeO2 sample no obvious peaks were detected at temperatures lower than 300 °C, denoting that Co species, in contrast to Cu, are more difficult to reduce.The Co/CeO2 reduction profile was comprised of several overlapping features in the ca.300-400 °C temperature range.These peaks are related to the reduction of surface oxygen groups along with the stepwise reduction of Co oxides to metallic cobalt [53].
Ni/CeO2 catalysts mainly exhibit two reduction peaks at 231 and 330 °C.The peak at 231 °C is attributed to adsorbed surface oxygen reduction, while the peak at 330 °C to the reduction of the bulk NiO and surface CeO2 [54][55][56][57].
Concerning the reduction profile of Fe/CeO2 sample, it has been widely recognized that hematite (Fe2O3) reduction to metallic iron (Fe 0 ) takes place through the formation of magnetite (Fe3O4) and wustite (FeO).Wustite is metastable and disproportionates into magnetite and metallic iron (4FeO → Fe3O4 + Fe) below 620 °C [58].Commonly, bare iron oxide shows overlapping features at ca. 300-800 °C, corresponding to the stepwise reduction of hematite to metallic iron [58][59][60].The Fe/CeO2 sample exhibits in addition a main peak at 296 °C, which can be attributed to surface oxygen

Reducibility Studies (H 2 -TPR)
Temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) experiments were performed to gain insight into the role of metal entity on the reducibility of M/CeO 2 catalysts.Figure 2 depicts the TPR profiles of M/CeO 2 catalysts, in terms of hydrogen consumption as a function of temperature.
In the Cu/CeO 2 sample the overlapping peaks at 100-300 ˝C temperature interval are assigned to Cu oxide species reduction along with the surface oxygen reduction [48][49][50][51][52]. Specifically, the peak at 133 ˝C is attributed to the reduction of Cu ions in close proximity to CeO 2 , while, the features at 215 ˝C and 267 ˝C are assigned to Cu entities not closely associated with ceria [52].
In the Co/CeO 2 sample no obvious peaks were detected at temperatures lower than 300 ˝C, denoting that Co species, in contrast to Cu, are more difficult to reduce.The Co/CeO 2 reduction profile was comprised of several overlapping features in the ca.300-400 ˝C temperature range.These peaks are related to the reduction of surface oxygen groups along with the stepwise reduction of Co oxides to metallic cobalt [53].
Ni/CeO 2 catalysts mainly exhibit two reduction peaks at 231 and 330 ˝C.The peak at 231 ˝C is attributed to adsorbed surface oxygen reduction, while the peak at 330 ˝C to the reduction of the bulk NiO and surface CeO 2 [54][55][56][57].
Concerning the reduction profile of Fe/CeO 2 sample, it has been widely recognized that hematite (Fe 2 O 3 ) reduction to metallic iron (Fe 0 ) takes place through the formation of magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ) and wustite (FeO).Wustite is metastable and disproportionates into magnetite and metallic iron (4FeO Ñ Fe 3 O 4 + Fe) below 620 ˝C [58].Commonly, bare iron oxide shows overlapping features at ca. 300-800 ˝C, corresponding to the stepwise reduction of hematite to metallic iron [58][59][60].The Fe/CeO 2 sample exhibits in addition a main peak at 296 ˝C, which can be attributed to surface oxygen reduction as well as to the facilitation of the stepwise reduction of Fe oxides to metallic iron.Based on the main hydrogen TPR peaks, the following order of reducibility was recorded: Cu/CeO 2 > Fe/CeO 2 > Ni/CeO 2 > Co/CeO 2 .
Catalysts 2016, 6, 39 6 of 27 reduction as well as to the facilitation of the stepwise reduction of Fe oxides to metallic iron.Based on the main hydrogen TPR peaks, the following order of reducibility was recorded: Cu/CeO2 > Fe/CeO2 > Ni/CeO2 > Co/CeO2.

Surface Characterization (XPS Analysis)
XPS measurements were carried out next to obtain insights into the elemental oxidation states and surface composition.Figure 3 depicts the XPS spectra in the 2p region of Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu catalysts supported on ceria.In the case of the Fe/CeO2 sample, peaks in the region of 709-713 eV with satellites at ca. 725 eV appear.Curve-fitting revealed the contribution of Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ ions at 709-711 eV and 711-713 eV, respectively [61,62].The presence of a certain amount of Fe 2+ ions probably implies the co-existence of Fe2O3 (as indicated by XRD) with lower valence iron oxides (FeO/Fe3O4).The Co 2p spectrum of Co/CeO2 catalyst is characterized by a main peak at 780.6 eV accompanied by a low intensity satellite and a spin-orbit doublet Co2p1/2-Co2p3/2 of 15.2 eV.These characteristics point to the formation of Co 3+ species in Co3O4-like phase [54].The Ni2p3/2 can be analyzed into two components corresponding to different Ni chemical states.The peak at ca. 854 eV is usually assigned to NiO, whereas the higher BE peak at 855-856 eV to Ni bonded with OH groups, i.e., Ni(OH)2 and/or NiOOH [63,64].It should be noted, however, the difficulty of unambiguously assigning the different chemical states of Ni oxides due to the complexity of Ni 2p spectra arising from multiplet splitting, shake-up satellites, and plasmon loss structures [65].In any case the majority of Ni species seems to be related with NiO in accordance with the XRD findings.The spectrum of the Cu/CeO2 sample is characterized by a Cu 2p3/2 band at 933.8 eV and shake-up satellites at ca. 944.0 eV, typical characteristics of Cu 2+ species in CuO-like phase [20,48,[66][67][68][69][70].The above assignments are in line with the XRD findings, which revealed the formation of the corresponding metal oxides in M/CeO2 samples (Table 2).

Surface Characterization (XPS Analysis)
XPS measurements were carried out next to obtain insights into the elemental oxidation states and surface composition.Figure 3 depicts the XPS spectra in the 2p region of Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu catalysts supported on ceria.In the case of the Fe/CeO 2 sample, peaks in the region of 709-713 eV with satellites at ca. 725 eV appear.Curve-fitting revealed the contribution of Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ ions at 709-711 eV and 711-713 eV, respectively [61,62].The presence of a certain amount of Fe 2+ ions probably implies the co-existence of Fe 2 O 3 (as indicated by XRD) with lower valence iron oxides (FeO/Fe 3 O 4 ).The Co 2p spectrum of Co/CeO 2 catalyst is characterized by a main peak at 780.6 eV accompanied by a low intensity satellite and a spin-orbit doublet Co2p 1/2 -Co2p 3/2 of 15.2 eV.These characteristics point to the formation of Co 3+ species in Co 3 O 4 -like phase [54].The Ni2p 3/2 can be analyzed into two components corresponding to different Ni chemical states.The peak at ca. 854 eV is usually assigned to NiO, whereas the higher BE peak at 855-856 eV to Ni bonded with OH groups, i.e., Ni(OH) 2 and/or NiOOH [63,64].It should be noted, however, the difficulty of unambiguously assigning the different chemical states of Ni oxides due to the complexity of Ni 2p spectra arising from multiplet splitting, shake-up satellites, and plasmon loss structures [65].In any case the majority of Ni species seems to be related with NiO in accordance with the XRD findings.The spectrum of the Cu/CeO 2 sample is characterized by a Cu 2p 3/2 band at 933.8 eV and shake-up satellites at ca. 944.0 eV, typical characteristics of Cu 2+ species in CuO-like phase [20,48,[66][67][68][69][70].The above assignments are in line with the XRD findings, which revealed the formation of the corresponding metal oxides in M/CeO 2 samples (Table 2).In the case of Ni/CeO2 the low BE peak at ca. 527 eV could be due to the differential charging of the oxide.Based on the area of OI, OII and OIII envelopes, a relative comparison between the M/CeO2 samples could be obtained (Table 4).It is evident that the ratio between the lattice oxygen to the sum of surface oxygen species notably changes with the metal type.Co/CeO2 catalysts possess the highest amount of OI species (70%), which are related to lattice oxygen in ceria and cobalt oxides.These differences in the population of surface oxygen species are expected to affect the redox reactions between the gaseous reactants and solid carbonaceous deposits with lattice oxygen ions, as is discussed in the sequence.3).It is evident that the ratio between the lattice oxygen to the sum of surface oxygen species notably changes with the metal type.Co/CeO 2 catalysts possess the highest amount of O I species (70%), which are related to lattice oxygen in ceria and cobalt oxides.These differences in the population of surface oxygen species are expected to affect the redox reactions between the gaseous reactants and solid carbonaceous deposits with lattice oxygen ions, as is discussed in the sequence.The surface composition of M/CeO2 samples obtained by XPS analysis, along with the bulk atomic concentrations (at.%), is presented in Table 5.Comparison of the XPS and nominal values of transition metal (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) atomic concentrations reveals a decrease in metal surface species for all samples.These findings can be understood to a good extent considering surface characterization studies over Co-Ce binary oxides [53], where it was demonstrated the impoverishment of catalyst surface in Co species during the calcination procedure.The latter has been mainly attributed to the low surface energy of cobalt compared to ceria, resulted in a localization of ceria on the outer surface.In a similar manner, it has been revealed that the surface concentration of metal ions (such as Ni and Co) supported on ceria-based materials can be notably decreased due to the incorporation of metal ions into the support lattice [73][74][75].This particular configuration, involving the coexistence of metal ions in the outer surface and inside the support structure, could largely favor the oxygen mobility, with large consequences in the catalytic activity (e.g., [75]).

Effect of Metal Entity on Steam Reforming Performance
Ethanol Steam Reforming (ESR) is a multi-molecular reaction involving several pathways producing hydrogen, CO, CO2 and numerous by-products, such as methane, ethylene, acetaldehyde, acetone, coke, etc. [76].The simplified reaction network, presented in Figure 5, can be considered for the different product distribution during ESR [77,78].This mainly involves apart from the ESR (Equation ( 1)) and water gas shift (Equation ( 2)) reactions, the ethanol decomposition (Equation ( 3)), ethanol dehydrogenation (Equation ( 4)), acetaldehyde decarbonylation (Equation ( 5)), acetone The surface composition of M/CeO 2 samples obtained by XPS analysis, along with the bulk atomic concentrations (at.%), is presented in Table 4. Comparison of the XPS and nominal values of transition metal (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) atomic concentrations reveals a decrease in metal surface species for all samples.These findings can be understood to a good extent considering surface characterization studies over Co-Ce binary oxides [53], where it was demonstrated the impoverishment of catalyst surface in Co species during the calcination procedure.The latter has been mainly attributed to the low surface energy of cobalt compared to ceria, resulted in a localization of ceria on the outer surface.In a similar manner, it has been revealed that the surface concentration of metal ions (such as Ni and Co) supported on ceria-based materials can be notably decreased due to the incorporation of metal ions into the support lattice [73][74][75].This particular configuration, involving the coexistence of metal ions in the outer surface and inside the support structure, could largely favor the oxygen mobility, with large consequences in the catalytic activity (e.g., [75]).

Effect of Metal Entity on Steam Reforming Performance
Ethanol Steam Reforming (ESR) is a multi-molecular reaction involving several pathways producing hydrogen, CO, CO 2 and numerous by-products, such as methane, ethylene, acetaldehyde, acetone, coke, etc. [76].The simplified reaction network, presented in Figure 5, can be considered for the different product distribution during ESR [77,78].This mainly involves apart from the ESR (Equation ( 1)) and water gas shift (Equation ( 2)) reactions, the ethanol decomposition (Equation (3)), ethanol dehydrogenation (Equation ( 4)), acetaldehyde decarbonylation (Equation ( 5)), acetone formation via acetaldehyde condensation, followed by decarboxylation (Equation ( 6)), ethanol dehydration (Equation ( 7)), methanation (Equation ( 8)), and carbon deposition (Equation ( 9)) reactions: formation via acetaldehyde condensation, followed by decarboxylation (Equation ( 6)), ethanol dehydration (Equation ( 7)), methanation (Equation ( 8)), and carbon deposition (Equation ( 9)) reactions: C2Η5ΟΗ(g)→CΟ(g) + CH4(g) + Η2(g), ΔΗ°298 = 49 kJ/mol (3)  Figure 6 depicts the effect of temperature (400-800 °C) on ethanol conversion and product selectivity during the ESR over M/CeO2 catalysts, at a constant S/C feed ratio of 3. The reforming process resulted mainly to H2, CO, CO2, and CH4.Minor quantities of C2H4, C2H6, and traces of CH3CHO and CH3COCH3 are also observed.The H2 selectivity follows, in general, a downward shift with increasing temperature, in contrast to CO selectivity.The particular high hydrogen selectivities at lower temperatures (400-500 °C) in the case of Fe-, Co-and Cu-based samples, which exceed the expected theoretical values from reaction stoichiometry, maybe due to the thermal decomposition and/or parallel reactions taking place at low temperatures.The latter keeps in step with the extended carbon formation at low temperatures, as will be discussed in the sequence.The selectivity towards Figure 6 depicts the effect of temperature (400-800 ˝C) on ethanol conversion and product selectivity during the ESR over M/CeO 2 catalysts, at a constant S/C feed ratio of 3. The reforming process resulted mainly to H 2 , CO, CO 2 , and CH 4 .Minor quantities of C 2 H 4 , C 2 H 6 , and traces of CH 3 CHO and CH 3 COCH 3 are also observed.The H 2 selectivity follows, in general, a downward shift with increasing temperature, in contrast to CO selectivity.The particular high hydrogen selectivities at lower temperatures (400-500 ˝C) in the case of Fe-, Co-and Cu-based samples, which exceed the expected theoretical values from reaction stoichiometry, maybe due to the thermal decomposition and/or parallel reactions taking place at low temperatures.The latter keeps in step with the extended carbon formation at low temperatures, as will be discussed in the sequence.The selectivity towards CO 2 and CH 4 decreases up to 600 ˝C and then gradually level-off until 800 ˝C.The variation of H 2 , CO, CO 2 , and CH 4 selectivity upon increasing temperature can be realized by taking into account the different reactions involved in ESR (Figure 5).At low temperatures the WGS reaction (Equation ( 2)) is favored, increasing the selectivity towards H 2 and CO 2 .In contrast, at high temperatures the reverse WGS reaction enhances the production of CO and H 2 O at the expense of H 2 and CO 2 .The decrease of CH 4 formation at higher temperatures may be ascribed to its reforming to CO and H 2 [32].
Catalysts 2016, 6, 39 12 of 27 CO2 and CH4 decreases up to 600 °C and then gradually level-off until 800 °C.The variation of H2, CO, CO2, and CH4 selectivity upon increasing temperature can be realized by taking into account the different reactions involved in ESR (Figure 5).At low temperatures the WGS reaction (Equation ( 2)) is favored, increasing the selectivity towards H2 and CO2.In contrast, at high temperatures the reverse WGS reaction enhances the production of CO and H2O at the expense of H2 and CO2.The decrease of CH4 formation at higher temperatures may be ascribed to its reforming to CO and H2 [32].The impact of catalyst type (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) and temperature on product distribution is more evident in Figure 7, which comparatively depicts the major product yield at 400, 600 and 800 °C.For comparison purposes the corresponding results over bare CeO2 are also depicted.The superior performance of M/CeO2 catalysts compared to bare CeO2 is clearly shown.The latter implies the pronounced effect of transition metal and/or metal-support interfacial sites on ethanol steam reforming, as discussed in the sequence.At 400 °C the best performance, in terms of H2 yield, is achieved by Co-and Cu-based catalysts both exhibiting a H2 yield of ~66%.Fe-and Ni-based catalysts demonstrated lower H2 yields of 59% and 48%, respectively.Ni/CeO2 catalysts display very high CH4 yield (24%), compared to all other M/CeO2 catalysts (~0.4%).This can be attributed to the acetaldehyde decarbonylation to CH4 (Equation ( 5)) over Ni sites at low temperatures [77,[79][80][81][82][83].At 600 °C, the Co-, Ni-, and Cu-based catalysts demonstrated a similar H2 yield of ~62%, with Fe/CeO2 catalyst exhibiting a slightly better yield (~67%).It is worth mentioning that at 600 °C CO formation is in general favored at the expense of CO2, probably implying participation of the reverse WGS reaction on the ESR reaction network (Figure 5).At 800 °C the Co-and Ni-based catalysts showed H2 yields of 65% and 62%, respectively, followed by a CO yield of 35% and 38%.Therefore, in these catalysts, the ESR reaction leads almost exclusively to H2 and CO.In contrast, the Fe-and Cu-based catalysts as well as the bare CeO2 exhibited significantly lower syngas yields and higher amounts of CH4, implying an inferior reforming performance at high reaction temperatures.The impact of catalyst type (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) and temperature on product distribution is more evident in Figure 7, which comparatively depicts the major product yield at 400, 600 and 800 ˝C.For comparison purposes the corresponding results over bare CeO 2 are also depicted.The superior performance of M/CeO 2 catalysts compared to bare CeO 2 is clearly shown.The latter implies the pronounced effect of transition metal and/or metal-support interfacial sites on ethanol steam reforming, as discussed in the sequence.At 400 ˝C the best performance, in terms of H 2 yield, is achieved by Co-and Cu-based catalysts both exhibiting a H 2 yield of ~66%.Fe-and Ni-based catalysts demonstrated lower H yields of 59% and 48%, respectively.Ni/CeO 2 catalysts display very high CH 4 yield (24%), compared to all other M/CeO 2 catalysts (~0.4%).This can be attributed to the acetaldehyde decarbonylation to CH 4 (Equation ( 5)) over Ni sites at low temperatures [77,[79][80][81][82][83].At 600 ˝C, the Co-, Ni-, and Cu-based catalysts demonstrated a similar H 2 yield of ~62%, with Fe/CeO 2 catalyst exhibiting a slightly better yield (~67%).It is worth mentioning that at 600 ˝C CO formation is in general favored at the expense of CO 2 , probably implying participation of the reverse WGS reaction on the ESR reaction network (Figure 5).At 800 ˝C the Co-and Ni-based catalysts showed H 2 yields of 65% and 62%, respectively, followed by a CO yield of 35% and 38%.Therefore, in these catalysts, the ESR reaction leads almost exclusively to H 2 and CO.In contrast, the Fe-and Cu-based catalysts as well as the bare CeO exhibited significantly lower syngas yields and higher amounts of CH 4 , implying an inferior reforming performance at high reaction temperatures.

Effect of Metal Loading
Figure depicts the effect of Co loading on the main products yield at 400, 600 , and 800 °C.It is evident that in the absence of metal (bare CeO2), the yields toward the reformate products (CO and H2) are much lower compared to the corresponding ones over Co/CeO2 catalysts.At 400 °C the optimum H2

Effect of Metal Loading
Figure 8 depicts the effect of Co loading on the main products yield at 400, 600 , and 800 ˝C.It is evident that in the absence of metal (bare CeO 2 ), the yields toward the reformate products (CO and H 2 ) are much lower compared to the corresponding ones over Co/CeO 2 catalysts.At 400 ˝C the optimum H 2 yield (~66%) is obtained for 20 wt.% metal loading, whereas at higher temperatures both the absolute products yields and product distribution are almost independent of the metal loading (0-30 wt.%).

Effect of S/C Ratio
Figure 9 presents the effect of S/C (0.5, 1.5, 3, 6) feed ratio on the major product yield achieved over the 20 wt.% Co/CeO 2 catalyst.At low temperatures, i.e., at 400 ˝C, the optimum performance is obtained for S/C reactants ratio of 3 (~66%), whereas for temperatures higher than 400 ˝C the H 2 yield is maximized for a S/C feed ratio of 6.At 800 ˝C the yield toward H 2 is equal to 77% for a S/C ratio of 6, as compared to approximately 63% for lower S/C ratios.However, it is worth noticing, that for a S/C ratio of 3 the largest fuel production was experienced, i.e. , sum of H 2 and CO, as the yield with regard to CO 2 and hydrocarbons is essentially negligible.Therefore, the S/C ratio equal to 3 can be regarded as optimal, in terms of ethanol energy exploitation.

Effect of S/C Ratio
Figure 9 presents the effect of S/C (0.5, 1.5, 3, 6) feed ratio on the major product yield achieved over the 20 wt.% Co/CeO2 catalyst.At low temperatures, i.e., at 400 °C, the optimum performance is obtained for S/C reactants ratio of 3 (~66%), whereas for temperatures higher than 400 °C the H2 yield is maximized for a S/C feed ratio of 6.At 800 °C the yield toward H2 is equal to 77% for a S/C ratio of 6, as compared to approximately 63% for lower S/C ratios.However, it is worth noticing, that for a S/C ratio of 3 the largest fuel production was experienced, i.e., sum of H2 and CO, as the yield with regard to CO2 and hydrocarbons is essentially negligible.Therefore, the S/C ratio equal to 3 can be regarded as optimal, in terms of ethanol energy exploitation.

Stability Experiments
Short-term (24 h) stability experiments were then carried out over Co-, Ni-, Fe-and Cu-CeO2 catalysts to assess the catalyst life time characteristics.Stability experiments were performed at low (400 °C), intermediate (600 °C) and high (800 °C) temperatures to reveal the effect of temperature on stability performance.Figure 10 depicts the H2 production rate at 400 °C (A), 600 °C (B) and 800 °C (C) versus time on stream (TOS) at a steam-to-carbon (S/C) ratio equal to 3. In these experiments the catalyst was first exposed to pure He up to the desired temperature, and then the standard feed mixture was introduced into the reactor.

Stability Experiments
Short-term (24 h) stability experiments were then carried out over Co-, Ni-, Fe-and Cu-CeO 2 catalysts to assess the catalyst life time characteristics.Stability experiments were performed at low (400 ˝C), intermediate (600 ˝C) and high (800 ˝C) temperatures to reveal the effect of temperature on stability performance.Figure 10 depicts the H 2 production rate at 400 ˝C (A), 600 ˝C (B) and 800 ˝C (C) versus time on stream (TOS) at a steam-to-carbon (S/C) ratio equal to 3. In these experiments the catalyst was first exposed to pure He up to the desired temperature, and then the standard feed mixture was introduced into the reactor.

Stability Experiments
Short-term (24 h) stability experiments were then carried out over Co-, Ni-, Fe-and Cu-CeO2 catalysts to assess the catalyst life time characteristics.Stability experiments were performed at low (400 °C), intermediate (600 °C) and high (800 °C) temperatures to reveal the effect of temperature on stability performance.Figure 10 depicts the H2 production rate at 400 °C (A), 600 °C (B) and 800 °C (C) versus time on stream (TOS) at a steam-to-carbon (S/C) ratio equal to 3. In these experiments the catalyst was first exposed to pure He up to the desired temperature, and then the standard feed mixture was introduced into the reactor.The superiority of Co/CeO2 catalysts in terms of H2 production and stability is obvious.Co-based catalysts demonstrated an excellent stability performance at 600 and 800 °C whereas a slight degradation was observed at 400 °C.At low temperatures (400 °C) the formation rate of hydrogen was gradually decreased over Ni/CeO2 catalysts during the first 13 h, remaining then stable.A more rapid deactivation was obtained with Cu-and Fe-based catalysts, which were totally deactivated after about 12 and 4 h, respectively.A similar picture was recorded at intermediate temperatures (Figure 10B), although in this case the deactivation was milder.Ni/CeO2 catalysts were stable in the first 14 h, declined then steadily.Cu-and Fe-based catalysts followed a downgrade trend in the first 10 h, stabilized then at very low levels.In contrast, at high temperatures, i.e., 800 °C (Figure 10C), all catalysts demonstrated an adequate stability performance throughout the period of 24 h.

Discussion
The present findings clearly demonstrated the superior steam reforming performance of Co/CeO2 catalysts, in terms of H2 production and stability, in the examined temperature range of The superiority of Co/CeO 2 catalysts in terms of H 2 production and stability is obvious.Co-based catalysts demonstrated an excellent stability performance at 600 and 800 ˝C whereas a slight degradation was observed at 400 ˝C.At low temperatures (400 ˝C) the formation rate of hydrogen was gradually decreased over Ni/CeO 2 catalysts during the first 13 h, remaining then stable.A more rapid deactivation was obtained with Cu-and Fe-based catalysts, which were totally deactivated after about 12 and 4 h, respectively.A similar picture was recorded at intermediate temperatures (Figure 10B), although in this case the deactivation was milder.Ni/CeO 2 catalysts were stable in the first 14 h, declined then steadily.Cu-and Fe-based catalysts followed a downgrade trend in the first 10 h, stabilized then at very low levels.In contrast, at high temperatures, i.e., 800 ˝C (Figure 10C), all catalysts demonstrated an adequate stability performance throughout the period of 24 h.

Discussion
The present findings clearly demonstrated the superior steam reforming performance of Co/CeO 2 catalysts, in terms of H 2 production and stability, in the examined temperature range of 400-800 ˝C.In contrast all other catalysts (Fe-, Ni-, Cu-CeO 2 ) exhibited satisfactory stability only at high temperatures (800 ˝C), whereas at low and intermediate temperatures a gradual deactivation was observed, being more intense for Cu-and Fe-based catalysts.The optimum performance of high metal loading Co-based catalysts, compared to conventional Ni-based catalyst, should be also emphasized.The latter is of major importance with regard to the direct utilization of ethanol in SOFCs, where highly active, conductive and robust electro-catalysts are required [84].
To better understand the influence of temperature and catalyst nature on stability performance indicative morphological studies (SEM/EDS) were carried out over the fast deactivated Cu/CeO 2 catalysts and very stable Co/CeO 2 catalysts (not shown for brevity's sake).In general, a significant amount of carbon was detected over Cu/CeO 2 exposed for 24 h to reaction conditions at 400 ˝C, which, however, decreased at 600 ˝C and was almost eliminated at 800 ˝C.To be specific, a small amount of deposited carbon, mostly in the form of carbon fibers, was identified at elevated temperatures.Moreover, no significant changes in the particle size were recorded upon temperature increase.
Given that the Cu/CeO 2 catalyst maintains its activity at 800 ˝C (Figure 10C) it could be argued that neither catalyst particle sintering nor the formation of carbon fibers could affect the catalysts' stability at high temperatures.In this regard, it has been shown that filamentous carbon does not directly lead to the poisoning of CeO 2 -based catalysts in ESR, although it delaminates metal particles from the support; amorphous carbon tends to block active sites leading to deactivation [85].Therefore, the deactivation of Cu/CeO 2 catalysts at low (400 ˝C), and to a lesser extent at intermediate (600 ˝C) temperatures, can be mainly ascribed to amorphous carbon deposition.The improved stability performance at 600 ˝C, compared to 400 ˝C, can be attributed to the facile gasification of carbonaceous deposits at elevated temperatures [85][86][87].
Similar conclusions, in relation to the impact of reaction temperature on the carbon deposition and particle size of Co/CeO 2 catalysts were obtained by means of SEM/EDS analysis.The particle size remained practically unaffected by temperature increase to 600 ˝C, whereas it was slightly increased after reaction at 800 ˝C.Amorphous carbon was revealed by EDS analysis and elemental mapping for spent Co/CeO 2 at 400 ˝C, although at a relatively lesser amount compared to Cu/CeO 2 .Carbon was also identified at 600 ˝C, but at a significantly lower amount to that observed at 400 ˝C.At higher temperature of 800 ˝C the carbon was almost absent.
In the light of the above results, it could be stated that Co/CeO 2 catalyst displayed the optimum reforming performance in terms of H 2 yield and life-time stability.In contrast, an inferior performance was obtained over Ni-, Cu-and Fe-based catalysts.In a similar manner, it was found that neither Cu nor Ni supported on ZnO catalysts were stable in ESR conditions [24].On Cu/ZnO the dehydrogenation of ethanol into acetaldehyde was favored, whereas on Ni/ZnO the decomposition of ethanol to CH 4 and CO x took place.
The present findings can be mainly interpreted by taking into account the surface and redox properties of transition metal-based catalysts.TPR studies revealed the lower reducibility of Co/CeO 2 catalyst amongst the investigated samples.The latter, could be possibly related to the strong metal-support interactions, maintaining the Co species in an oxidized state (Co δ`s pecies).This factor could be considered responsible for the adequate ESR performance of Co/CeO 2 catalysts, in agreement with relevant literature studies [42][43][44][88][89][90][91].
On the other hand, although Cu-based materials are highly reducible under mild conditions, they are almost inactive toward reforming reactions, leading mainly to ethanol dehydrogenation.In this regard, it has been reported that the over-reduction of CeO 2 -based materials under H 2 -rich environments, can lead to the blockage of the redox mechanism involved in ESR and the carbon gasification reaction network [92][93][94].
In addition, the high concentration of lattice oxygen in Co/CeO 2 , as compared to Fe-, Cu-and Ni-CeO 2 catalysts, can be further considered for their superior ESR performance.To this end, the key role of oxygen availability in both H 2 yield and stability of Co-based catalysts has been revealed [36]; the gas-solid interactions between the adsorbed hydrocarbon species (C n H m ) and the surface oxygen groups (O x ) can facilitate hydrocarbon species gasification instead of their decomposition to carbon.
The inhibition of carbon deposition by gas-solid interactions between hydrocarbons and lattice oxygen has been already demonstrated in several catalytic systems [95][96][97][98].In this regard, isotopic tracer and nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) clearly suggested that methane is selectively oxidized by lattice oxygen ions to produce carbon monoxide during the catalytic partial oxidation (CPOX) of methane to synthesis gas on Rh/Ce 0.56 Zr 0.44 O 2´x catalysts [97].
Based on the above aspects it can be stated that the intrinsic reactivity of Co entities, along with the strong metal-support interactions in Co/CeO 2 composites, maybe accounted for the high oxidation degree of cobalt entities, as well as for their lower reducibility under reaction conditions.Furthermore, the high concentration of lattice oxygen in the Co/CeO 2 catalyst can be further regarded for the inhibition of carbon deposition through the gas-solid interactions between the adsorbed hydrocarbon species and the lattice oxygen.These factors could be considered equally crucial for the transformation of the deposited carbonaceous species into gaseous products during the stream reforming process.
The present results are in agreement with those obtained over Cu-and Co-based catalysts during ethanol [90] or iso-octane [48,93] steam reforming.Highly reducible Cu-based catalysts are almost inactive for ESR, leading mainly to ethanol dehydrogenation [90].In contrast, Co/SiO 2 catalysts demonstrated superior reforming performance, despite their limited reducibility at low temperatures due to the strong metal-support interactions [90].Along the same lines, it has been demonstrated that the oxygen storage capacity of the support can greatly affect the reforming performance of Co-based catalysts by promoting the gasification of carbon deposits [88,91].To this end, the superior ESR performance of Co/CeO 2 catalysts as compared to ZrO 2 -or Al 2 O 3 -based samples has been ascribed to the abundance of redox sites on the catalyst surface [36,40,41].More specifically, it has been clearly revealed by means of steady-state reaction experiments coupled with post-reaction characterization techniques that the high oxygen mobility in Co/CeO 2 samples-linked with the high oxygen storage capacity (OSC) of ceria-not only suppresses the carbon deposition, but also allows delivery of oxygen to ethoxy species, thus promoting the complete oxidation of carbon to CO 2 [36].
In the light of the above analysis, it is evident that in order to fully understand the complex and dynamic ESR mechanism of ceria-based transition metal catalysts, it is essential to know the local surface structure and chemistry of active entities under real "working" conditions.This requires the combination of advanced ex situ characterization studies with in situ operando measurements.In this regard, the key role of metal-ceria interactions on the ESR performance, has been verified by combining in situ and ex situ characterization techniques [25,41].

Materials Synthesis
A series of CeO 2 supported transition metal catalysts (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) were synthesized using the incipient wet impregnation method.Initially, the bare CeO 2 was prepared by diluting CeO 2 precursor salt (Ce(NO 3 ) 3 ¨6H 2 O, Sigma Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) in double distilled water.The whole contents were heated and stirred until the evaporation of water.The resulted sample was dried at 100 ˝C for 16 h and then calcined at 600 ˝C for 2 h (heating rate: 5 ˝C/min).The ceria-based catalysts were then prepared via the impregnation of calcined ceria in an aqueous metal (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) solution, employing the corresponding nitrate salts (Sigma Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) as precursors, at the appropriate concentration so as to yield 20 wt.% metal loading.To explore the impact of metal loading a series of cobalt-based catalysts with metal contents of 15, 20, 25 and 30 wt.% were also prepared following the same synthesis route.The resulted solutions were heated at first under stirring, then dried overnight at 120 ˝C and calcined at 600 ˝C for 2 h.

Textural Characterization (BET)
The textural characteristics of as prepared composites were determined by N 2 adsorption/desorption isotherms at 77 K, employing the multipoint BET analysis in a Tristar Micromeritics 3000 flow apparatus.BET area was measured according to the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method at the relative pressure in the range of 0.005-0.99.The total pore volume was estimated by the nitrogen volume at the highest relative pressure.The Barret-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method was employed to obtain the average pore diameter.Prior to measurements the catalysts were degassed at 250 ˝C for 16 h.

Structural Characterization
The crystalline structure was determined using the X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) method.A Siemens D 500 diffractometer was employed for the XRD measurements with a Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm) operated at 40 kV and 30 mA.Diffractograms were collected in the 2θ = 10 ˝-80 ˝range at a scanning rate of 0.04 ˝over 2 s.The DIFFRAC plus Basic data evaluation software was employed to identify the diffraction peaks and through the Scherrer equation to calculate the crystallite sizes of the detected phases within an experimental error of 10%.

Morphological Characterization
The morphology of fresh and spent catalysts was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a JEOL 6300 microscope, coupled with EDX (Oxford Link ISIS-2000) for the determination of local elemental composition.

Redox Characterization (H 2 -TPR)
TPR studies were elaborated in a flow system assembled with a quadrupole mass spectrometer (Omnistar, Balzers).The TPR tests were carried out in a quartz micro-reactor loaded with ca. 100 mg of catalyst.Typically, ~100 mg of the material is placed in the reactor and heated to 1000 ˝C with a heating rate of 10 ˝C/min under 5% H 2 /He flow (50 cm 3 /min).All samples were heated at 600 ˝C for 1 h under 5% O 2 /He flow and then cooled down to room temperature, prior to the TPR measurements.

Surface Characterization (XPS)
The photoemission experiments were performed in an ultrahigh vacuum system (UHV), comprised of a fast entry specimen assembly, a sample preparation chamber and an analysis chamber.The base pressure in both chambers was kept at 1 ˆ10 ´9 mbar.Non-monochromatized Al K α line at 1486.6 eV and an analyzer pass energy of 97 eV, giving a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 1.7 eV for the Au 4f 7/2 peak, were employed in all XPS studies.The XPS core level spectra were analyzed using a fitting routine, which can decompose each spectrum into individual mixed Gaussian-Lorentzian peaks after a Shirley background subtraction.The calibration of the analyzer's kinetic energy scale was accomplished according to ASTM-E 902-88.The binding energy (BE) scale was calibrated by attributing the main C1s peak at 284.8 (adventitious carbon) eV.The powdered samples were pressed into pellets with a thickness of 1 mm and 1 cm diameter before being introduced into the ultrahigh vacuum system.

Catalytic Activity Measurements
The apparatus used to perform the ESR experiments has been already described in our previous relevant studies regarding the iso-octane steam reforming over Cu supported on rare earth oxides catalysts [48,93].In brief, it is comprised of: (i) a liquid reactants feed unit equipped with He mass flow controllers and the gas-liquid saturator units; (ii) a fixed bed U-shaped quartz tubular reactor (9.6 mm, i.d.) loaded with 250 mg catalyst admixed with an equal amount of quartz particles and (iii) a gas analysis system.
A mixture of ethanol and water vapors of different steam-to-carbon (S/C) molar ratios was introduced into the reactor by bubbling He (99.999% purity, Air Liquid) through two separate vessels containing liquid C 2 H 5 OH (99.5% purity, Riedel-de Haen) and twice distilled water.The S/C feed ratio was adjusted by controlling the temperature and He-bubbled flow in the H 2 O and ethanol saturators (based on their corresponding vapor pressures).The inlet volumetric flow rate was held constant at 150 cm 3 /min, corresponding to a weight/flow (W/F) and Gas Hourly Space Velocity (GHSV) of 0.1 g.s/cm 3 and 21,000 h ´1 (based on a catalyst bed volume of about 0.45 cm 3 ), respectively.The feed concentration used during the activity and stability experiments is: P EtOH = 2 kPa, P H2O = 2, 6, 12, 24 kPa, corresponding to a S/C feed ratio of 0.5, 1.5, 3, 6, respectively.Short-term durability experiments were performed by continuously monitoring the product rate as a function of time-on-stream (TOS, 24 h) at three different temperatures, i.e., 400, 600, and 800 ˝C.
An on-line gas chromatograph (HP 6890), equipped with thermal conductivity and flame ionization detectors, was employed to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze reactants and products.The separation of H 2 , CH 4 , and CO was achieved with a Molecular Sieve 5A column ( The formation rate of product i, r i , is calculated on the basis of its % v/v concentration in the reactor outlet, according to the equation: where F T , is the total flow rate and v m , is the gas molar volume at STP conditions (298 K and 1 bar).

Conclusions
In the present work, the steam reforming of ethanol over transition metal catalysts (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) supported on CeO 2 was examined.Various parameters, concerning the effect of operation temperature, steam-to-carbon ratio, and metal loading on the catalytic activity and stability were explored.The optimal catalytic performance was observed for the 20 wt.% Co/CeO 2 catalyst, which offers H 2 yields up to 66% at a steam-to-carbon feed ratio of 3. Stability experiments demonstrated the excellent stability of Co/CeO 2 catalysts in the temperature range of 400-800 ˝C.An inferior stability performance, particularly at low temperatures, was observed for all the other tested catalysts, following the order: Co >Ni >Cu >Fe.The excellent stability of Co/CeO 2 catalysts can be mainly assigned to the strong metal-support interactions which in turn leads to an increased population of surface oxygen species, related to lattice oxygen in ceria and cobalt oxides.This factor is thought to be responsible for the facile gasification of the adsorbed species, thus preventing catalyst deactivation.The enhanced performance of Co-based catalysts, compared to a conventional Ni-based catalyst, is of major importance towards the direct utilization of ethanol in SOFCs, where highly active and robust electro-catalysts need to be developed.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.X-ray powder diffraction patterns of 20 wt.% M/CeO2 catalysts (A) where M stands for Fe (a), Co (b), Ni (c) and Cu (d), and of Co/CeO2 catalysts (B) with 15 (a), 20 (b), 25 (c) and 30 wt.%(d) Co loading.2.1.3.Reducibility Studies (H2-TPR)Temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) experiments were performed to gain insight into the role of metal entity on the reducibility of M/CeO2 catalysts.Figure2depicts the TPR profiles of M/CeO2 catalysts, in terms of hydrogen consumption as a function of temperature.In the Cu/CeO2 sample the overlapping peaks at 100-300 °C temperature interval are assigned to Cu oxide species reduction along with the surface oxygen reduction[48][49][50][51][52].Specifically, the peak at 133 °C is attributed to the reduction of Cu ions in close proximity to CeO2, while, the features at 215 °C and 267 °C are assigned to Cu entities not closely associated with ceria[52].In the Co/CeO2 sample no obvious peaks were detected at temperatures lower than 300 °C, denoting that Co species, in contrast to Cu, are more difficult to reduce.The Co/CeO2 reduction profile was comprised of several overlapping features in the ca.300-400 °C temperature range.These peaks are related to the reduction of surface oxygen groups along with the stepwise reduction of Co oxides to metallic cobalt[53].Ni/CeO2 catalysts mainly exhibit two reduction peaks at 231 and 330 °C.The peak at 231 °C is attributed to adsorbed surface oxygen reduction, while the peak at 330 °C to the reduction of the bulk NiO and surface CeO2[54][55][56][57].Concerning the reduction profile of Fe/CeO2 sample, it has been widely recognized that hematite (Fe2O3) reduction to metallic iron (Fe 0 ) takes place through the formation of magnetite (Fe3O4) and wustite (FeO).Wustite is metastable and disproportionates into magnetite and metallic iron (4FeO → Fe3O4 + Fe) below 620 °C [58].Commonly, bare iron oxide shows overlapping features at ca. 300-800 °C, corresponding to the stepwise reduction of hematite to metallic iron[58][59][60].The Fe/CeO2 sample exhibits in addition a main peak at 296 °C, which can be attributed to surface oxygen

Figure 4
Figure 4 depicts the O1s spectra of M/CeO2 samples.Curve-fitting, based on a mixture of Lorentzian and Gaussian curves, revealed three components.The low binding energy peak (OI) at ~529 eV can be ascribed to lattice oxygen, the intermediate peak (OII) at ~531 eV to surface O, OH groups and oxygen vacancies and the high energy band (OIII) at ~534 eV to adsorbed water [68,71,72].In the case of Ni/CeO2 the low BE peak at ca. 527 eV could be due to the differential charging of the oxide.Based on the area of OI, OII and OIII envelopes, a relative comparison between the M/CeO2 samples could be obtained (Table4).It is evident that the ratio between the lattice oxygen to the sum of surface oxygen species notably changes with the metal type.Co/CeO2 catalysts possess the highest amount of OI species (70%), which are related to lattice oxygen in ceria and cobalt oxides.These differences in the population of surface oxygen species are expected to affect the redox reactions between the gaseous reactants and solid carbonaceous deposits with lattice oxygen ions, as is discussed in the sequence.

Figure 4
Figure 4 depicts the O1s spectra of M/CeO 2 samples.Curve-fitting, based on a mixture of Lorentzian and Gaussian curves, revealed three components.The low binding energy peak (O I ) at ~529 eV can be ascribed to lattice oxygen, the intermediate peak (O II ) at ~531 eV to surface O, OH groups and oxygen vacancies and the high energy band (O III ) at ~534 eV to adsorbed water [68,71,72].In the case of Ni/CeO 2 the low BE peak at ca. 527 eV could be due to the differential charging of the oxide.Based on the area of O I , O II and O III envelopes, a relative comparison between the M/CeO 2 samples could be obtained (Table3).It is evident that the ratio between the lattice oxygen to the sum of surface oxygen species notably changes with the metal type.Co/CeO 2 catalysts possess the highest amount of O I species (70%), which are related to lattice oxygen in ceria and cobalt oxides.These differences in the population of surface oxygen species are expected to affect the redox reactions between the gaseous reactants and solid carbonaceous deposits with lattice oxygen ions, as is discussed in the sequence.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Schematic representation of the reaction network in the ethanol steam reforming (ESR) process.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Schematic representation of the reaction network in the ethanol steam reforming (ESR) process.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Effect of temperature on product selectivity and C 2 H 5 OH conversion over M/CeO 2 catalysts.Reaction conditions: S/C = 3, m cat = 250 mg, F T = 150 cm 3 /min.

Table 3 .
Percentage of surface oxygen species on M/CeO2 catalysts.

Table 3 .
Percentage of surface oxygen species on M/CeO 2 catalysts.

Table 4 .
Bulk and surface-X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)-atomic concentrations (at%) for 20 wt.% M/CeO2 catalysts.estimated from XPS spectra; b calculated from the nominal catalyst composition, assuming that M is oxidized to MxOy during the preparation procedure, as indicated by XRD analysis. a
10 ft ˆ1/8 in), whereas CO 2 , H 2 O, C 2 H 4 , C 2 H 6 , C 2 H 5 OH, CH 3 CHO and CH 3 COCH 3 were separated in a Poraplot Q column (10 ft ˆ1/8 in) in a series bypass configuration.The equations used to calculate the ethanol conversion (X EtOH ), product selectivity (S i ), and yield (Y i ), have as follows: EtOH] denotes the ethanol concentration and r i the formation rate of product i (mol/s) considering the following produced chemical species: H 2 , CO, CO 2 , CH 4 , C 2 H 4 , C 2 H 6 , CH 3 CHO, CH 3 COCH 3 .