Preparation and Electrocatalytic Characteristics of Pdw/c Catalyst for Ethanol Oxidation

A series of PdW alloy supported on Vulcan XC-72 Carbon (PdW/C) with total 20 wt. % as electrocatalyst are prepared for ethanol oxidation by an ethylene glycol assisted method. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization shows that PdW nanoparticles with an average size of 3.6 nm are well dispersed on the surface of Vulcan XC-72 Carbon. It is found that the catalytic activity and stability of the PdW/C catalysts are strongly dependent on Pd/W ratios, an optimal Pd/W composition at 1/1 ratio revealed the highest catalytic activity toward ethanol oxidation, which is much better than commercial Pd/C catalysts.


Introduction
Development of novel catalysts with high electrocatalytic activity for ethanol oxidation has received much attention because the electroactivity of anodic materials is one of the main factors influencing the practical application of direct ethanol fuel cells (DEFCs) [1,2].Palladium (Pd), as one of platinum(Pt) group elements, could hold high electro-oxidation catalytic activity and has larger abundance and lower price compared to Pt [3,4].Pd catalyst does not exhibit electroactivity for ethanol electro-oxidation in acid solutions, while it displays high electroactivity for ethanol electro-oxidation in alkaline solutions, such as NaOH and KOH [5,6].
Recently, Pd nanoparticle has attracted much attention due to their distinguished advantages, such as significantly large surface areas and high stability [7].The interest in Pd metals is not only for lowering the cost of catalysts, but also for improving the catalytic activities [8].One method to promote the catalytic activity of Pd is alloyed with other metals, including Ag [9,10], Fe [11] and Sn [12,13].Many binary or ternary composite catalysts involved in Pd have been developed to enhance the electroactivity of the Pd catalyst for ethanol oxidation [14,15], such as Pd-Ru [16], Pd-Ni-P [17], Pd-Co [18], Pd-Pt [19,20], Pd-Au [21], and so on.
So, the addition of a second metal with Pd, to enhance its activity for ethanol electro-oxidation, is effective approach, but the durability with time of such electrode needs further improvement [22].It has been claimed that tungsten (W) oxide was a suitable promoter for noble metal catalyst, leading to a significant decrease in poisoning species (CO) [23,24].The presence of W species is expected to assist in the electro-oxidation of poisonous reaction intermediates adsorbed on the active Pd sites [25,26].
In this work, PdW/C catalysts with different Pd/W ratios were successfully prepared by an ethylene glycol assisted method.The catalytic activity and stability of PdW/C catalysts towards ethanol oxidation reaction (EOR) in alkaline solution were examined.The electrochemical properties of PdW electrocatalysts were also probed to explore their potential applications in DEFCs.

TEM
Figure 1 shows a typical TEM image of the prepared PdW/C and Pd/C catalysts.The nanoparticle sizes of PdW/C catalyst were primarily distributed within the range of 2-6 nm.The average PdW nanoparticles size of PdW/C was approximately 3.6 nm, whereas Pd nanoparticles of Pd/C were 5.2 nm.It should be pointed out that ethylene glycol as the reducing agent and dispersing agent, could effectively disperse the Pd nanoparticles.At the same time, the PdW nanoparticles size of PdW/C is smaller than Pd nanoparticles of Pd/C, indicating that demonstrating PdW/C is more beneficial for ethanol electro-oxidation in alkaline medium [27,28].As shown in Figure 1, PdW/C catalyst was spherical and homogeneously dispersed on Vulcan XC-72 Carbon with no remarkable observation of agglomerations compared with Pd/C.High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM) image clearly shows the lattice fringe image of (1 1 1) planes with the interplanar distance of 0.2 nm.In Figure 1d, EDS of PdW/C shows the existence of Pd, W and C elements, illustrating the formation of W metal in as-obtained materials.

XRD
The XRD patterns of W/C, Pd/C and PdW/C catalysts were shown in Figure 2. The typical diffraction peaks of WC around 2θ = 26° and 43°, is attributed to the C (002) and C (004), which are not W typical diffraction, as shown in the XRD patterns of Pd/C and PdW/C, and meanwhile C diffraction peaks also appeared.Sharp and well-defined peaks of Pd/C was observed at 2θ values of 40.14°, 46.69°, 68.17°, 82.17°, and 86.69°, corresponding to the planes of (1 1 1), (2 0 0), (2 2 0), (3 1 1), and (2 2 2), respectively, according to JCPDS No.65-6174.The strong diffraction peak of PdW/C catalyst was also found at 40.14°, corresponding to the plane of (1 1 1).No significant peak shift is observed for the PdW/C (1:1) [29].The average particle size of the prepared PdW/C nanoparticles (d) was estimated by using the Scherrer Equation [30] after background subtraction from Pd (1 1 1) peak at 2θ of 40°, agreeing with TEM results, which is as shown in Table 1.

Electrochemical Measurements
The cyclic voltammetry of PdW/C (1:1) and Pd/C in the absence of ethanol is shown in Figure 3.It is noted that they all exhibit significantly high anodic and cathodic current densities.The oxidation peak at lower anodic potential during the forward scan is ascribed to the formation of the adsorbed hydroxyl OHads while the peaks at high positive potential are related to the formation of Pd oxides [31,32].The potential region from −1.1 to −0.6 V versus SCE on the CV curve of the catalyst is associated with the hydrogen adsorption/desorption.The potential region from −0.3 V to 0.3 V can be attributed to the formation of the palladium oxide layer on the surface of the PdW/C catalyst, and OH − ions are first chemisorbed in the initial stage of the oxide formation at higher potentials, which are transformed into higher valence oxides.The electrochemical active surface areas (EASA) of PdW/C (1:1) and Pd/C was calculated to be 144.1 and 71.2 m 2 •g −1 , respectively (Table 2), indicating that PdW/C (1:1) has a higher electrochemical activity [33].Cyclic voltammetry was used to quantify the electrocatalytic activities of the Pd-based catalysts prepared at room temperature.Figure 4 shows the CV results detected in 1 M KOH + 1 M C2H5OH solution.The scan rate was selected at 50 mV•s −1 in the potential range from −0.8 to 0.4 V.The oxidation peak in the forward scan corresponds to the oxidation of freshly chemisorbed species from ethanol adsorption.At a higher potential, the formation of PdO will block further adsorption of reactive species and lead to a remarkable decrease in current.During the negative-going sweep, the previously formed PdO will be reduced to catalytic active Pd, leading to the recovery of EOR current.Corresponding reactions are shown in Equations ( 2) and (3) [34]: It is observed that the peak current density on PdW/C (1:1) is higher than those on other Pd-based catalysts (Figure 4), which could indicates that PdW/C (1:1) catalyst has the highest catalytic activity toward ethanol.In the forward scan, the onset potential (Eonset) of PdW/C (1:1) is −0.71V, which has a negative shift of ~60 mV compared to that of Pd/C (JM) (−0.65 V).The peak current densities are 62.29 and 48.70 mA•cm −2 (the area is the surface area of the electrode) for PdW/C (1:1) and Pd/C (JM), respectively, while their peak potentials are −0.27 and −0.17 V.The parameters, including the onset potential, the forward peak potential (Ep) and the forward peak current intensity (ip) are shown in Table 2. Chronoamperometry was employed to evaluate the stability of the Pd-based catalysts.As shown in Figure 5, the current densities represent less decay at the applied constant potentials for 3600 s.The current density of ethanol electro-oxidation on the PdW/C (1:1) catalyst is 6.94 mA•cm −2 , which is the highest among all the Pd-based catalysts, indicating that the PdW/C (1:1) exhibits a more stable electrocatalytic activity towards ethanol oxidation in the alkaline media than other catalysts.These results are in good accordance with the CV results.

Materials
PdCl2 was purchased from Shanghai Institute of Fine Chemical Materials (Shanghai, China); Vulcan XC-72 Carbon was supplied by Cabot Co. Ltd. (Boston, MA, USA); Tungsten hexachloride (99.5%, WCl6), Ethylene glycol (AR, C2H6O2), Sodium hydroxide (AR, Nelectro-oxidation H) and ethanol were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) 5% Nafion ® solution was provided by DuPont Co. Ltd (Wilmington, DE, USA); All reagents were of analytical reagent grade and used without further purification.The water utilized in the studies was double-distilled and deionized.

Catalyst Preparation
Vulcan XC-72 Carbon was treated in 5 M HNO3 solution with vigorous stirring.A certain amounts with different ratios of WCl6 and PdCl2 were dissolved in 50 mL ethylene glycol.Subsequently, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 9 using 1 M NaOH solution .The mixtures were stirred for 1 h at 80 °C.The prepared carbon ethylene glycol solution was added in the mixture.After stirred for 3 h, the mixtures were filtered and washed several times with deionized water.The remaining solids were dried in a vacuum oven for 24 h at 80 °C.The weight percentages of metal were 20% in all catalysts.20% Pd/C was prepared by the similar method.20% commercial Pd/C (JM) catalyst was purchased from Johnson Matthet Company (Shanghai, China).

Characterization
XRD patterns were collected using a Bruker D8-Advance Powder X-ray diffractometer (Cu KR radiation, wavelength 1.5418 Å, Bruker, Germany).Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were characterized with a JEM-2100F HR-TEM model (JEM, Tokyo, Japan) using an accelerating voltage of 80 and 200 KV.10.0 mg catalyst was dissolved in aqua regia (a strong acid mixture with HCl: HNO3 volume ratio of 3:1) to form a Pd aqueous solution, and ICP-AES (Varian, Anaheim, CA, USA) was performed to detect the catalyst metal loading.All electrochemical measurements were performed in a standard three-electrode cell using a CHI 660C Electrochemical Analyzer (Chenhua Company, Shanghai, China).

Electrochemical Test
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry measurements were collected in 1 M KOH + 1 M C2H5OH solution at a scan rate of 50 mV•s −1 .The working electrodes ware prepared, dropping 4 μL of the catalyst onto glassy carbon electrode (GCE, 0.07 cm 2 ).The ink was prepared by ultrasonically mixing 5 mg of electrocatalyst sample in a mixture of 1 mL of ethanol and 120 μL of 5% Nafion ® solution.The counter electrode was Pt foils and the reference electrode was saturated calomel electrode (SCE).The CV tests were carried out in the potential range of −0.8 to 0.4 V. Before experiments, pure nitrogen gas (99.99%) was bubbled through the solution at least 30 min to remove the dissolved oxygen in the solution.

Conclusions
In summary, Vulcan XC-72 Carbon supported 20 wt.% PdW/C catalysts with different Pd/W ratios were prepared by an ethylene glycol method.Among them, PdW/C (1:1) catalysts have a small average diameter (3.6 nm) and large electrochemical surface areas (144.1 m 2 •g −1 ).It could also exhibit a higher reactivity toward EOR in alkaline electrolyte, compared to other PdW/C electrocatalysts.The peak current densities of PdW/C (1:1) (62.29 mA•cm −2 ) is higher than that of Pd/C (JM) (48.70 mA•cm −2 ).PdW/C (1:1) also exhibits more stable electrocatalytic activity than Pd/C (JM) towards ethanol oxidation in the alkaline media.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Chronoamperometry curves of Pd-based catalysts in 1 M KOH +1 M C2H5OH solution at a fixed potential of −0.3 V at 50 mV s −1 .

Table 1 .
Summary of physical properties of PdW/C and Pd/C catalyst.Catalysts Pd

Table 2 .
Comparison of electrochemical performances on the prepared Pd-based catalysts.