The Influence of Surface Alumina and Silica on the Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants

Practical photocatalysis for degradation of organic pollutants must take into account the influence of other chemicals. Significant Al deposition on titania can occur at naturally occurring concentrations of dissolved Al. This paper reviews the author’s work on the influence of deliberately deposited hydrous oxides of aluminium on the behavior of a ~130 m2 g−1 rutile TiO2, and then compares the behavior of deposited alumina with that of deposited silica. On rutile some adsorbed nitrogen is infrared-active. Alumina and silica deposited on the rutile reduce, and ultimately eliminate, this infrared-active species. They also reduce photocatalytic oxidation of both propan-2-ol and dichloroacetate ion and the photocatalytic reduction of diphenyl picryl hydrazine. The surface oxides suppress charge transfer and may also reduce reactant adsorption. Quantitative measurement of TiO2 photogreying shows that the adsorbed inorganics also reduce photogreying, attributed to the capture of photogenerated conduction band electrons by Ti4+ to form Ti3+. The influence of adsorbed phosphate on photocatalysis is briefly considered, since phosphate reduces photocatalytic disinfection. In the context of classical colloid studies, it is concluded that inorganic species in water can significantly reduce photoactivity from the levels that measured in pure water.


Introduction and Scope
This paper briefly reviews work carried out by the author and colleagues on the effect of surface oxides on the photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide.Although many studies have highlighted the potential of TiO 2 photocatalysis for the degradation of organic pollutants, especially dye residues in aqueous effluent [1][2][3], any practical application must consider the influence of other chemicals, of either natural or anthropogenic origin, in the water to be treated.Aluminium may be introduced as a flocculant in water treatment systems or as a mordant in dyehouses and although the concentrations of naturally occurring aluminium in the world's major rivers are highly variable they may be as high as 100 μM [4][5][6][7].Classical colloid studies on model systems, summarized in the discussion section below, have shown significant adsorption of aluminium species on titania surfaces at these concentrations [8][9][10][11] and this paper considers the influence on photocatalytic activity of hydrous oxides of aluminium deliberately deposited on the TiO 2 surface.Silica, also, may be present in freshwater [12], often as a silica-alumina species [13].Therefore, the effects of adsorbed silica are compared with those of adsorbed alumina.
Although many practical studies of pollutant degradation are carried out with P25 TiO 2 , its composite nature (~20/80 rutile/anatase) would, in general, complicate the interpretation of the effects of alumina and of silica deposition because of the existence of both rutile and anatase surfaces and the possibility of surface alumina or silica blocking charge-carrier transfer between the two crystal forms.The use of either a pure rutile or a pure anatase to demonstrate the effects of surface oxide deposition avoids this complication.Therefore, a high area rutile, with a photocatalytic activity comparable with P25 has been chosen for this study.

Preparation of Alumina and Silica Coatings on High Area Rutile
The rutile used for the majority of the studies described in this paper was prepared by the aqueous hydrolysis of TiCl 4 and supplied by the Solaveil business of Uniqema (now Croda Chemicals).The characterization of similar particles has been described more fully elsewhere [14,15].Two different TiO 2 batches (#1; 140 m 2 g −1 and #2; 123 m 2 g −1 ), were used for the experiments reported in this paper.XRD confirmed that both products were rutile and broadening of the 110 rutile diffraction line suggested that the primary units had a dimension of 7-10 nm in a direction perpendicular to the 110 crystal plane.Electron microscopy showed the existence of lenticular primary units approximately 70 nm in length and ~10 nm across.A typical transmission electron micrograph, Figure 1A, shows that the primary units often form clusters in which the c-axis of the primary crystals are oriented parallel to one another-rather like a group of pencils which are held by a weak rubber band which allows individual units to slip lengthwise w.r.t. to one another.Rutile P25

(B)
The photocatalytic activity for oxidation of propan-2-ol of this rutile is demonstrated by the comparison, in Figure 1B, with that of the well known catalyst P25.
Results are reported here for two series of "alumina" coatings (1A on TiO 2 #1, and 2A on TiO 2 #2) and for two different series of silica "coatings" (1S on TiO 2 #1, 2S on TiO 2 #2.).In natural waters, the mechanisms of alumina or silica deposition on TiO 2 , are greatly perturbed from those associated with deliberate coating deposition [16][17][18][19] by both the composition and history of the water.For example, in the presence of silicic acid, the size and charge distribution profiles of aluminium species are significantly changed from those normally associated with aluminium hydroxide chemistry, perhaps because aluminium hydroxide polymerization is inhibited [20].They are also time dependent.[20].Further, the relative strengths of binding of silicate, sulphate and phosphate to hydroxyl aluminium species is pH dependent; at pH > 5 silicate binds more strongly than sulphate and at pH > 6.6 silicate binds more strongly than phosphate [21].Further perturbation occurs because aluminium in natural water may be complexed by naturally occurring organic matter, e.g., humic acids [22] and the efficiency of this complexation may be changed by the presence of other ions [23] or oxidative pre-treatment such as ozonation [24] Therefore, instead of attempting to mimic the mechanisms that take place in natural waters, the oxides have been deposited on the TiO 2 by well defined routes."Alumina" coatings of series 1A were prepared by precipitation of a hydrous alumina onto a polyphosphate dispersed suspension (30 g dm −3 ) of rutile in water [15].Aluminium sulfate was added at a controlled pH of 3.0 followed by caustic sodium aluminate at a controlled pH of 10.The resulting dispersion was then neutralized, filtered, washed and dried in air at 110 °C.Alumina coatings on series 2A samples were prepared by dropwise addition of caustic sodium aluminate to an aqueous slurry of TiO 2 #2 at 50 °C [14].The slurry was then neutralized with HCl, filtered and washed.Thus the coatings on series 2A were by a much simpler route than the coatings of series 1A.Both sets of "silica" coatings were prepared by the same route, Iler's "dense silica" method [17].The silica levels of the 1S series were determined as 0.5, 2.3, 8.9 and 20% by XRF.The target levels of the 2S series were 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 (0.7), 1, 3 (3.2), 5 and 10 (9.1)% silica; the XRF analyses are given in parentheses.Zeta potential results provided by Dr. I. R. Tooley (Croda) showed that the isoelectric point, i.e.p., fell from a pH of ~5.7 for the uncoated rutile to a pH of ~2.8 for the 5% silica sample.
To demonstrate that the "coatings" exist on the TiO 2 surface, and that deposition does not simply results in a mixture of bulk silica and bulk titania, further characterization was carried out by solid state n.m.r. and by i.r.spectroscopy of adsorbed nitrogen.

NMR Characterization of Silica and Alumina Coated 123 m 2 g −1 Rutile
The solid state 29 Si magic angle spinning (MAS) n.m.r.spectra were measured on 0.7, 3.2, 5 and 9.1% silica coated rutiles (series 2S). Figure 2A compares the spectrum of the 5% silica coating with that of a physical mixture of 5% aerosil SiO 2 with 95% TiO 2 .Had the "coating" procedure created a separate silica precipitate the two spectra would look the same.Instead they are very different.Consideration of the chemical shifts [25] suggests that the physical mix contains a large amount of silicon in Q 4 [Si(OSi) 4 ] and Q 3 [OSi(OSi) 3 ] environments whereas the chemically bonded silica-TiO 2 contains predominantly Q 2 [O 2 Si(OSi) 2 ] and Q 1 [O 3 SiOSi] environments.These results indicate that cross-linking of the Si(OH) 4 is much less in the coating than in the aerosil.The possibility that the reduced cross-linking was because of the low temperature at which the coating silica had been deposited was excluded by the negligible difference between spectra of a 3% coated sample before and after 450 °C heat-treatment, Figure 2B.Overall, the solid state n.m.r.results give confidence that the silica does not exist as a separate silica precipitate [26].  2Si MAS n.m.r.spectra of a 5 wt% silica-95% TiO 2 physical mix (thick line) and a 5 wt% silica-TiO 2 surface coated sample (thin line) prepared by Iler's "dense silica" method (series 2S); (B) N.m.r. of 3.2 wt% silica-TiO 2 before (red) and after (black) heat treatment at 450°C (series 2S).Analogous experiments on alumina coated TiO 2 are more difficult to interpret, because of the quadrupole moment of 27 Al [25].Although the 27 Al spectra of 1% alumina and 25% alumina coatings are very similar, after allowing for the noise due to the low levels of Al in the 1 wt% alumina sample, it is clear that the peak of the 25 wt% alumina sample is more symmetrical than that of the 1 wt% alumina sample.This asymmetry suggests that the aluminium environment associated with the 25 wt% sample is more ordered and this is confirmed by the presence of spinning sidebands (arising from satellite transitions due to the quadrupolar nature of aluminium).It is concluded that the aluminium environment is similar for all loadings and that this is an octahedral environment (with perhaps a minor peak at ~60 p.p.m. indicating that 2% of the spectral intensity of the 25% sample is associated with tetrahedral aluminium).It is reasonable to suggest that the disorder at low levels of alumina is due to perturbation of Al's on the surface of the rutile and that this perturbation decreases as the alumina layer becomes thicker with increasing amounts of alumina.

Characterization by IR Spectroscopy of Adsorbed Nitrogen
Infrared transmission spectra (256 scans, 2 cm −1 resolution) of adsorbed nitrogen were measured on thin pressed discs of #1 rutile, and on both alumina (1A) and silica (1B) coated rutile, placed in a specially constructed cell, in which they could be heated in vacuum prior to prior to exposure to nitrogen at ~−120 K. Full details are given elsewhere [15].Gas phase nitrogen is infrared inactive, because nitrogen has no permanent dipole.Physically adsorbed nitrogen normally remains i.r.inactive, and as shown later in this section, no i.r.absorption was detectable when nitrogen was physically adsorbed on either silica or alumina.By contrast, the transmission i.r spectra of pressed discs of TiO 2 cooled to ~120 K, Figure 4, demonstrated that on rutile some adsorbed nitrogen is infrared active [15].In nitrogen the spectrum showed a weak absorption near ~2335 cm −1 which, as shown in the inset to Figure 4, became more intense with increasing nitrogen pressure and was absent from the spectrum of the same disc measured in vacuum.This absorption was assigned to adsorbed dinitrogen because it was very close to the 2331 cm −1 Raman band associated with the stretching-vibration of nitrogen gas; it is considered to be due to N 2 adsorbed on specific sites on titania at which the presence of a strong electrostatic field makes the N N stretching vibration i.r.-active.Absorption at 2258 cm −1 in the spectrum of adsorbed 15 N 2 confirmed the assignment since its frequency agreed well with the calculated value of 2256 cm −1 for isotopically shifted dinitrogen.Similar absorption was found for N 2 adsorbed on P25 titania.The experiments were then repeated using samples prepared by depositing (a) hydrous alumina (series 1A) and (b) silica (1S) to form a coating on the same preparation of high area rutile that had been used for the initial spectroscopic studies of adsorbed nitrogen.In both cases i.r.absorption of surface nitrogen was measured as a function of pressure and, as shown in Figure 5, was weaker than on the uncoated rutile.This implies that both alumina and silica block the surface sites on rutile at which nitrogen adsorbs in i.r.-active form.Thus, i.r. the results support the conclusions from n.m.r. that both alumina and silica are deposited on the TiO 2 .
By repeating the measurements using rutile coated with increasing quantities of alumina the dependence of the strength of the nitrogen signal on the amount of surface alumina was established.This variation is plotted relative to the i.r.absorption of the uncoated rutile in Figure 6A.The corresponding results for silica coatings are plotted in Figure 6B.

Photocatalytic Oxidation
Two reactions have been used to probe photocatalytic oxidation.The first is the oxidation of a neutral molecule, propan-2-ol, in the form of the pure liquid [15].As propan-2-ol is uncharged, its interaction with the catalyst surface is expected to be relatively insensitive to changes in the surface charge on the TiO 2 particle caused by coating.Further, previous work comparing vapour adsorption of ethanol on titania and on the same titania coated with either silica or alumina revealed that on all three samples the adsorption was strong and specific with an isotherm form close to that of type I.This was interpreted as the surface of the coated samples being highly hydrated and having the same potential as the uncoated TiO 2 to interact with polar molecules [27].Consequently, any changes in propanol oxidation were expected to be primarily a consequence of suppressed charge-carrier transfer.
By contrast, oxidation of an aqueous solution of dichloroacetate anion at pH 3 is expected to be affected by changes in surface charge.At pH 3 the surface of titania is positively charged whilst the surface of silica is much less positive, or negative.It might therefore be expected that changes in catalytic activity due to suppressed charge-transfer on silica coated surfaces would be supplemented by the consequences of reduced adsorption of the DCA anion.

Photocatalytic Oxidation of Propan-2-ol
The photocatalytic activities of the alumina-coated rutiles (series 1A) for the oxidation of liquid propan-2-ol to acetone were measured chromatographically, as detailed elsewhere [15] and the activities compared with the activity of the untreated rutile #1.The results, Figure 6A, show that the effect of the surface alumina on the photocatalytic activity was broadly similar to its effect on the intensity of the nitrogen absorption.Both effects were eliminated by ca.30% of alumina.A corresponding plot for series 1S silica coated rutiles is shown in Figure 6B.The effects of surface silica on the i.r.-active nitrogen and on the photocatalytic activity were again very similar and even more marked than those of alumina.It appears that as alumina (or silica) covers the surface it inhibits the transfer of positive-holes to OH and thus prevents the formation of the hydroxyl radicals responsible for propanol oxidation.
The strategy was repeated for the silica-on-rutile series 2S prepared from rutile #2 [26].The results (Figure 7A) again show that, above 1% silica, deposition of silica reduces the activity for propan-2-ol photocatalytic oxidation.Extrapolation of the linear plot of Figure 7A suggests that the activity for acetone production is almost eliminated by ~12% silica.Lower levels of silica, up to 0.5%, cause a small increase in activity (Figure 7B) but above this level the activity vs. coating level plot fall more linearly than in the N 2 and propan-2-ol oxidation experiments of Figure 6B.The reasons for this difference have not been identified; the variation may imply a different distribution of active sites on rutiles #1 and #2.The effect of alumina (series 2A) and silica (series 2S) deposition on rutile (#2) on the oxidation of propan-2-ol are compared in Figure 7B.As for the experiments with 1A and1S, alumina reduces activity less effectively than does silica, but deposition of alumina on rutile #2 reduced photocatalysis by a smaller amount than deposition on rutile #1 (Figure 6A).This is probably due to differences in the quality of the coating resulting from the simpler alumina deposition process.

The Photocatalytic Oxidation of DCA
To test the generality of the results, the photocatalytic degradation of dichloroacetic acid (DCA) was then measured at pH 3 on the silica coated rutiles (2S) [28].Since the pK A of DCA is 1.3, the dichloroacetate ion is the predominant species at pH 3. DCA degradation was selected as a test reaction because, unlike propan-2-ol oxidation but like other saturated carboxylic acids, DCA degradation is believed to proceed by direct-hole mechanism under these conditions [29].The direct correlation between the initial rate of DCA photodegradation and the specific surface area of anatase nanoparticles supports this interpretation [30].Unlike the results for propan-2-ol, the activity was not completely eliminated at higher silica levels.However, once again, after an initial small increase at very low silica levels, the photocatalytic activity decreased, to 25% of that of uncoated rutile on deposition of only 3-5% silica.I.e. the DCA oxidation rate reduced more rapidly than the propan-2-ol oxidation rate.Direct-hole degradation of carboxylic acids, such as DCA, has been shown to be more sensitive to surface area variation than are reactions, such as propan-2-ol oxidation that are mediated by the diffusible OH radicals [31] and this sensitivity has been interpreted as a consequence of the need for reactant adsorption when the mechanism is direct hole-transfer.As discussed further in Section 6.2, the large change in the DCA oxidation activity associated with low silica loadings is a probable consequence of the silica suppressing DCA adsorption in addition to reducing whole transfer to it.

Photocatalytic Reduction of DPPH and Photogreying
To determine the effect of a hydrous oxide coating layer on photocatalytic reduction two reactions, the reduction of DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical) and photogreying of TiO 2 were used [26,32].

Photocatalytic Reduction of DPPH •
The photocatalyzed reduction of dipheny picryl hydrazine (DPPH), e− +DPPH• → DPPH , was used to monitor the effect of surface oxides on the photocatalysis of a reduction reaction.DPPH is a neutral molecule and therefore adsorption on the catalyst is less likely to be affected by changes its surface charge than is an ionic species such as the dichloroacetate anion.Work, by Truscott [32] had demonstrated that the photocatalyzed reduction rate, depended on the type of TiO 2 , and followed the order P25 (uncoated, mainly anatase) > Tayca MT100T (coated rutile) > Ishihara FPT4-12 (coated rutile) ≥Tayca MT100Z (coated rutile).The rate of decay was not significantly affected when oxygen was replaced by argon.Nor did either either water or propan-2-ol affect the observed kinetics.Since both water and propanol would be expected to adsorb at the TiO 2 surface, this suggests that DPPH reduction is not sensitive to changes in adsorption.The experiments were carried on a dispersions of TiO 2 (0.25 g dm −3 ) in a solution of DPPH (2 × 10 −4 M) in a 50:50 mix of mineral oil and caprylic acid triglyceride (MOTG; supplied by Uniqema) using a similar cell to that used for the propan-2-ol oxidation.The stable free radical, diphenyl picryl hydrazine, DPPH, is purple and has a broad absorption from 400 to 800 nm centred at 520 nm [26].The DPPH readily captures an electron to form DPPH which then captures a proton from the solvent to form yellow DPPH 2 .The DPPH 2 has a UV absorption band whose tail extends into the visible but is very small by 520 nm.Consequently the absorption peak of DPPH disappears as it is reduced and, following Truscott et al. [32] the rate of photocatalytic reduction of DPPH was monitored by following the decrease of the 520 nm absorption, as described by Truscott et al. [32] and by Egerton and Mattinson [26].The results of Figure 9A show an approximately linear decrease in absorbance with increasing exposure time and the results of Figure 9B show the effect of coating level on the rate at which the 520 nm absorbance decreases.

Photogreying
In the absence of oxygen, and in the presence of a hole acceptor, TiO 2 particles turn grey when exposed to UV light [33].Formation of Ti 3 + has been demonstrated when deoxygenated TiO 2 suspensions were irradiated and then cooled to low temperatures to allow Ti 3+ detection by ESR [34][35][36][37].It is therefore reasonable to assume that the photogreying process is associated with the steps such as: Because DPPH• photoreduction monitors the ability of UV-generated photoelectrons to migrate to the surface and reduce another molecule, whereas photogreying is related to the reduction of the Ti IV , photogreying provides an interesting comparison with DPPH reduction.
Dispersions of TiO 2 (5 wt.%) in a C 12 -C 15 alkyl benzoate (Finsolv) medium were prepared by milling the mixtures for 15 min at 5000 rpm with a "MINI MOTOR" mill (Eiger Torrance MK M50 VSE TFV), filled (70%) with zirconia beads (0.8-1.25 mm).These dispersions were then transferred to a specially constructed cell as described by Egerton and coworkers [26,33] and placed on a turnTable 12 cm beneath a 75W UV light source.An oxygen free environment was maintained by a quartz cover on the cell held in place by a movable catch.Measurements of L * , related to the reflectance of the Y illuminant (maximum intensity at 550 nm), as defined by the International Commission on Illumination (CIE), by the equation were taken every 30 min for 240 min using a Minolta chroma meter (CR-300), previously calibrated against a white tile (L * = 97.95)[26] .The effect of silica on the photogreying of TiO 2 (rutile) nanoparticles is shown in Figure 10A-C [28].In all cases photogreying of all samples exhibits a similar pattern; a sharp initial drop in L followed by a slower drop at longer time intervals.Interestingly, like all previous reactions, there is in fact an increase in photogreying at low silica loadings.This suggests that the cause of the initial increase is not associated with adsorption.At silica loadings ≥1% there is a reasonable parallel between the rates of DPPH• reduction and the rate of photogreying.An exact correspondence between the two would tend suggest that the Ti(IV) that are reduced during the photogreying process are, at the rutile surface.However the results do not exclude the possibility that electrons are first trapped at bulk Ti 4+ centres and then migrate to the surface [37], since the presence of at least two different trapped electron sites either on or in high area rutiles of this type has been confirmed by low temperature ESR studies [38].

The Influence of Phosphate on Photocatalytic Disinfection
The foregoing discussion has focused on the effects of surface alumina and of surface silica on the photocatalytic activity of rutile.In this final sub-section of relevant results, work on the effect of phosphate on the disinfection activity of P25 (~80% anatase) is summarized.Phosphate ions adsorb on the surface of TiO 2 photocatalysts and even small amounts can poison the activity [39][40][41][42].Phosphate ions such as H 2 PO 4 − adsorb strongly on titanium dioxide surfaces probably by an exchange reaction with surface hydroxyl groups [39].The adsorption is so strong that it inhibits the anatase-rutile transformation that can otherwise be induced by milling Degussa P25 [40] and Okazaki et al. reported that phosphate inhibits the adsorption of basic amino-acids [41].Matthews and coworkers demonstrated that adsorption at concentrations as low as 1 mM, phosphate adsorption reduces photo-oxidation of simple organics (ethanol, aniline and salicylic acid) by ~50% [42].As an example of this effect, the results in Figure 11 show how the disinfection activity of P25 for.E. coli.decreased as the phosphate concentration in solution increased [43].For a concentration of 3.7 mM KH 2 PO 4 the rate constant for the disinfection of E. Coli. of initial concentration 2.7 × 10 6 cfu fell from 3.1 × 10 −2 to 1.0 × 10 −2 min −1 ).

The Effectiveness of the Different Coating Procedures
Silica may be deposited as a surface layer on pigmentary, 250 nm rutile [17], and this surface layer has been demonstrated by transmission electron microscopy [18,27], vapour adsorption [27] secondary ion mass spectrometry and XPS [27,44] The same method has been used to deposit silica on two different batches of nanoparticulate, ~130 m 2 g −1 , rutile and, although the coating is not observable in electron micrographs of the treated nano-rutile, both the i.r.studies of adsorbed N 2 and the solid-state n.m.r.results for series 2S samples confirm that silica deposition has occurred.i.e., the silica is on not in, or beside the rutile.There is also evidence that alumina deposits on 250 nm titania [14,16,18] and two coating procedures, a relatively complex one for series 1A, and a simpler procedure series 2A, have been used to do this on the high area rutile.The results in this review indicate that the presence of these inorganic species on the TiO 2 surface modify photocatalysis of both oxidation and reduction.The greater the deposition of inorganic, the greater the decrease in activity.For similar amounts deposited, the reduction in photocatalytic activity follows the sequence: Studies by others have shown that phosphate adsorbs on TiO 2 and reduces photocatalytic activity.This conclusion has been confirmed by the effect of dissolved phosphate on the ability of P25 to kill E. coli.
It has been demonstrated that transition metal ions, dopants, either on or in the rutile, can provide localized levels within the band gap.These can act as traps or electron-hole recombination centres and hence influence recombination rates [45] and therefore photocatalytic activity [46][47][48].However, it seems improbable that such simple species as alumina, silica and phosphate act in this way.Instead, it has been shown that the alumina and silica forming a coating which blocks access to the rutile of both nitrogen [15] and organic probe molecules [27].Because both silica and alumina are insulators, the coating prevents the transfer of photogenerated electrons or holes from the rutile particles to the interface with the fluid in which the rutile is dispersed and therefore lower the photocatalytic activity.
If, for the purpose of an order of magnitude estimate, the rutile particles are taken to be spheres of radius r given by r = 3/Sρ R , (where S is the surface area and ρ R , 4.2 g cm −3 , is the density of rutile) 140 m 2 g −1 rutile corresponds to r = 5.1 nm.If these spherical particles are and to be covered by a uniform layer of alumina of thickness t and density ρ coat of ~2.1 g cm −3 (since the hydrous coating is less dense than crystalline alumina) the amount of alumina required to cover the surface is given by If it is further assumed that an effective coating requires a uniformly thick hydrous oxide coating of 1 nm thickness, the estimated weight of the surface coating corresponds to a loading of ~24%.(taking advantage of the fact that ρ R = 2ρ coat ).The figure is of the same order as the 20 to 30% estimated from the intensity dependence of i.r.-active nitrogen on alumina (Figure 6A) and silica (Figure 6B).
The idea that the coating then blocks the transfer of both photogenerated holes and electrons is supported by the reduction of photocatalytic oxidation and photocatalytic reduction and also by the coating coverages necessary to eliminate photocatalytic oxidation of propan-2-ol (Figure 6A,B) being broadly similar to those necessary for eliminating formation of i.r.active nitrogen.Detailed differences may occur because the coatings are more porous to nitrogen than to propan-2-ol or because the nitrogen adsorption was measured on rutile outgassed at 350 °C.The different effectiveness for reducing propan-2-ol oxidation of alumina coatings from series 1A (Figure 6A) and 2A (Figure 7B) is attributed either to a more effective coating brought about by the more careful coating sequence of series 1A or to an effect of the phosphate dispersant which was used only for series 1A.It is postulated that there are differences in the uniformity of the coating or in the coating porosity.
In general the activity patterns which led to the conclusions of the preceding paragraph are broadly paralleled by the other results, particularly those for DPPH• photo-reduction which like propan-2-ol photo-oxidation requires ≥10% silica to reduce the activity to below 1/3 of that of uncoated rutile (Figure 9B).

Dependence of Photocatalysis on Coating Induced Changes in Adsorption
The very significant decrease in activity for DCA degradation at silica levels as low as 3 wt.%contrasts with the > 10% necessary for propan-2-ol and DPPH.This difference is probably influenced by decreased adsorption of the DCA anion which is the dominant species at the reaction pH of 3. Because TiO 2 prepared by hydrolysis of TiCl 4 has a point of zero charge (p.z.c.) of ≥ 5.5 [8,28,49], the surface of uncoated TiO 2 surface is positively charged at pH 3.However, as shown in Figure 12, based on results of Tooley for rutile #2 [28] and on Furlong, Sing and Parfitt for TiCl 4 -derived rutile (but allowing for the much lower area of their rutile) [50], deposited silica lowers the isoelectric point.As shown in Figure 12, the p.z.c. of the catalyst falls significantly at silica levels between 4 and 5%.Both sets of results imply that the surface charge at pH 3 is very small and that, therefore, adsorption of the DCA anion on silica-coated rutile would be greatly reduced.Since adsorption is a necessary prerequisite for the direct hole degradation of DCA, the reduced adsorption is the probable reason for the photocatalytic activity reaching its minimum value at between 3 and 5% silica, a much lower figure than the ~10% silica necessary to reduce propan-2-ol oxidation.(Figure 6B).Thus, the DCA results suggest that the reduced catalytic activity due to suppressed charge-transfer on silica coated surfaces is supplemented by the consequences of reduced adsorption of the pollutant.The conclusion is consistent with the that reached by Enriquez and Pichat [31] that that the hole attack mechanism for carboxylic acids is much more sensitive to surface area, and therefore adsorption, variation than is the (diffusible) OH radical mechanism.[50], but "correcting" the silica levels to allow for the lower surface area of the rutile used by them (20 m 2 g −1 ) ■.

Wt % Silica pH at pointof zero charge
Since, at 8.9, the p.z.c. of γ-alumina is higher, not lower, than that of TiO 2 [8] the effects of alumina deposition on titanium dioxide will be to increase the p.z.c. and therefore anionic reactants are more, not less, likely to adsorb on alumina coated rutile.In coatings containing both silica and alumina a general increase in p.z.c. with increasing fraction of alumina has been reported [51] but the coating sequence is also important [52].

Possible Perturbation of the Photocatalytic Results Caused by Dispersion Changes
A small increase in activity for oxidation of propan-2-ol (Figure 7B) and dichloroacetate (Figure 8) and reduction of DPPH• (Figure 9B) was observed at very low silica coating levels.Whilst it is possible that this increase occurs because of changes in particles charge of the rutile caused by the deposition of silica, it is more probably associated with changes in the degree of particle dispersion.Changes in titania dispersion induced by milling have been demonstrated to influence photocatalytic rates [53,54].Normally, improved dispersion reduces photocatalytic activity because the reduction in effective size of the dispersed particles leads to increased absorption near 350 nm [55].The UV light is therefore absorbed in a shorter path length and consequently by a smaller number of particles.Thus, in any given particle more charge carriers are formed.Since the probability of recombination is increased as the number of charge carriers increases, the proportion of UV-generated electrons and holes that reaches the particle surface and initiates a catalytic reaction is reduced [56].It is this recombination which often leads to an I 0.5 dependency of photocatalytic rate on intensity I.For a fixed flux of incident photons the catalytic activity decreases, i.e., the photonic efficiency decreases.(Appreciation of this somewhat counter-intuitive conclusion may be helped by an over-simplified comparison of the activity of 10 separate crystals each of which absorb one photon-giving a rate proportional to 10 × √1-with that of 1 crystal which absorbs 10 photons-giving a rate proportional to 1 × √10.)As shown in Figure 13, this effect for propan-2-ol has been confirmed by measuring the oxidation rate before and after milling the rutile suspension.The photocatalytic activity of the unmilled, more poorly dispersed system was 50% greater than that of the milled suspension.It is therefore not unreasonable to attribute the observed ca.20% initial increase in activity to poorer dispersibility of the silica coated rutiles induced by increased aggregation of the coated samples.

The Implications of These Results for Practical Treatment of Water
Practical photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants must take into account the influence of other chemicals and one intention of this review was to consider how inorganic species adventitiously present in aqueous systems may modify the photocatalytic activity of TiO 2 suspensions.As a simplified illustration of a mechanism by which this may occur under laboratory conditions, the specific case of surface alumina is now considered.Evidence of adsorption of aluminium ions on titania, prepared like the rutile used in this study by hydrolysis of TiCl 4 , was systematically generated in a series of studies by Healy and co-workers and facilitates this consideration [8][9][10][11].TiO 2 particles in aqueous suspension carry a pH dependent surface charge.At a particular pH-the p.z.c-the TiO 2 surface is uncharged; below the p.z.c-the TiO 2 surface is positive; above the p.z.c the surface is negative.At the p.z.c., the rate of flocculation or coagulation, D, is limited only by diffusion but if the liquid pH differs from the TiO 2 p.z.c. by more than 0.5 units the similarly charged particles repel one another and flocculation rates are reduced to some value R. Healy used the ratio D/R-the stability ratio-as a measure of the suspension's colloidal stability and showed that in the presence of KNO 3 , an indifferent electrolyte, the stability ratio of a TiO 2 suspension reached its minimum at pH~6, i.e., at the same pH as the p.z.c., of TiO 2 determined by electrophoresis [8].For γ-alumina, the p.z.c.shifted to ~8.9 but the same pattern of results was obtained and in both cases the minimum of D/R was independent of the KNO 3 concentration [8].If however, the stability of a titania sol was measured in increasing concentrations (from 4 × 10 −7 to 2.1 × 10 −5 M) aluminium nitrate solutions the p.z.c.shifted from pH 5.9 (zero Al(III) aq ) to pH 9 in 2.1 × 10 −5 Al(NO 3 ) 3 , as shown in Figure 14.This was interpreted as consistent with progressive nucleation of a coating of aluminium hydroxide with the complete coating, corresponding to formation of a hydrated alumina surface on the TiO 2 , occurring at Al(III) concentrations ≥ 12 μM [9].As indicated in the introduction, significantly higher concentrations of aluminium can occur in many effluent streams.Further, since much of the aluminium in freshwater may be present as fine particles it is important to note that when mixed suspensions of titania and alumina in KNO 3 were left for 24 h their coagulation behaviour became practically identical to that of a single Al 2 O 3 dispersion.It was concluded that Al 3+ had dissolved from the alumina particles and reprecipitated on the titania surface to give particles that were superficially identical with alumina [10,11].As indicated in Section 2.1, additional routes to surface deposition of both alumina and silica occur in natural waters.
The implication of the results of Healy's group is that TiO 2 catalysts in Al-containing aqueous streams will acquire an alumina coating and the results reviewed in this paper imply that this coating will directly affect (reduce) the photoactivity of the catalysts.The results from silica coating and dissolved phosphate that have been summarized in this review suggest that other inorganics may behave similarly.In addition to directly affecting charge-carrier transfer-as described above for propan-2-ol, the changes in surface potential caused by layers of alumina and silica will influence the adsorption of charged species-as described in Section 6.2 for the dichloroacetate ion on silica-coated TiO 2 .Changes in the p.z.c. to higher pH's will accompany the formation of surface alumina layers, changes to lower pH values will accompany the formation of silica layers.Many dye molecules are ionic [3,4].For example, azo dyes are made in both anionic and cationic forms and their adsorption and subsequent decolourations is known to depend on the surface charge of the catalyst.Thus, in addition to the direct effects on photocatalysis exemplified in this review, inorganic oxide coatings will also have an indirect effect-via modified adsorption-on many dye decolouration reactions.Both effects should be considered when designing practical photocatalytic treatment systems.There is little use in designing catalysts with activities greater than that of a standard titania if the practical advantage of the greater activity is negated by increased adsorption of dissolved inorganic species.Figure 14.Variation of the p.z.c. of TiO 2 with increasing concentration of Al(NO 3 ) 3 .The plot is derived from results of Wiese and Healy [8].The same group reports a p.z.c of 8.9 for γ-alumina.

Summary and Conclusions
Both the infrared spectroscopic studies of adsorbed nitrogen and the solid state n.m.r.measurements that have been reviewed in this paper confirm that silica and alumina can be deposited to form a coating on the surface of rutile.Classical colloid studies had previously demonstrated that both suspended alumina particles and dissolved aluminium ions change the surface properties (e.g., the point of zero charge) of suspended TiO 2 particles, and had suggested that an alumina layer forms on the surface of TiO 2 .Together, these results imply that TiO 2 in Al-containing aqueous streams will acquire an alumina coating.It has been demonstrated that such coatings reduce the photocatalytic activity of TiO 2 for both photo-oxidation and photo-reduction reactions.
Since both silica and alumina are insulators it is suggested that any coating blocks the interaction of photogenerated charge-carriers with reactant molecules.This suggestion is consistent with order of magnitude estimates of the amount silica or alumina that is needed to cover the surface.Earlier measurements of vapour adsorption had indicated that the hydrophilic nature of rutile, alumina-coated rutile and silica-coated rutile are similar.Therefore, for an uncharged hydrophilic molecule, such as propanol, the main mechanism by which silica or alumina coating reduces photoactivity is by suppression of charge transfer to the surface.
Silica coatings lower the point of zero charge (p.z.c.) of coated TiO 2 ; alumina coatings raise the p.z.c.This change in the p.z.c.affects the adsorption of charged species.It is demonstrated that silica coatings lessen photoactivity for the pH 3 degradation of DCA at lower coating levels than are necessary to lower the activity for propan-2-ol oxidation.It is suggested that in this case reduction of photocatalytic activity is caused by lessened adsorption of DCA in addition to the suppression of charge transfer.This effect of modified adsorption is likely to be important for photocatalytic decolouration of ionic dyes.
It is also demonstrated that silica coatings have similar effects on both photogreying of the TiO 2 and photoreduction of the DPPH radical.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.(A) Transmission electron micrograph of Rutile #1.The red bar represents 100 nm; (B) Comparison of the photocatalytic activity for propan-2-ol oxidation of Rutile (#1) and P25 as a function of catalyst concentration.

Figure 3 .
Figure3.27 Al MAS n.m.r.spectra of TiO 2 /alumina prepared with 1 wt% alumina (red) and 25 wt% alumina (black) on rutile (series 2A).Sensitivities have been adjusted to facilitate comparison of the two signals.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4.The single beam spectrum of N 2 on high area rutile, sample A, before (lower spectrum) and after (upper spectrum) adsorption of N 2 .(Bands in the CH stretching region are artefacts due to grease vapour condensed on the windows and are present in the blank spectrum).The inset shows an enlargement of the 2320-2360 cm −1 region of the spectrum at: (a) 0; (b) 1; (c) 1.5;(d) 2.7; (e) 4.9; (f) 6.8; and (g) 9.7 kPa of N 2 .(Taken from Egerton T.A. et al. [15] Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC).

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The dependence of the N 2 absorption at 2335 cm −1 on the presence of 15% alumina or 8.9% silica deposited on the surface of the high area rutile #1.No 2335 cm −1 absorption was measured on Aerosil or Alon C. All measurements were made at ~ 150 °C (123 K).

Figure 6 .Figure 7 .
Figure 6.(A)The effect of surface alumina and (B) the effect of surface silica on the intensity of the IR of adsorbed nitrogen (at 8 kPa N 2 ) and on the activity for photocatalytic oxidation of propan-2-ol.Both sets of results are normalized relative to the result for the untreated starting rutile-#1.

Figure 8 .
Decrease in relative rates of dichloracetate oxidation at high levels of silica deposited on rutile #2.(The activity of rutile #2 is taken as 1

Figure 11 .
Figure11.The effect of increasing concentrations of phosphate on the disinfection of E. coli.by P25 (Initial concentration 2.7 × 10 6 c.f.u.).measured as the % of bacteria no longer viable after 20 min irradiation.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.The dependence of measured p.z.c.'s on the weight of silica precipitated onto rutile #2 (130 m 2 g −1 ) ■. and p.z.c.'s measured by Furlong et al.[50], but "correcting" the silica levels to allow for the lower surface area of the rutile used by them (20 m 2 g −1 ) ■.