A Review of Synergistic Catalytic Removal of Nitrogen Oxides and Chlorobenzene from Waste Incinerators

: Emission of harmful gases, nitrogen oxides (NOx), and dioxins pose a serious threat to the human environment; so, it is urgent to control NO x and dioxin emissions. The new regulations for municipal solid waste incineration emissions set new stringent requirements for NO x and dioxin emission standards. Most of the existing pollutant control technologies focus on single-unit NO x reduction or dioxin degradation. However, the installation of separate NO x and dioxins removal units is space-consuming and costs a lot. Nowadays, the simultaneous elimination of NO x and dioxins in the same facility has been regarded as a promising technology. Due to the extremely high toxicity of dioxins, the less toxic chlorobenzene, which has the basic structure of dioxins, has been commonly used as a model molecule for dioxins in the laboratory. In this review, the catalysts used for nitrogen oxides/chlorobenzene (NO x /CB) co-removal were classiﬁed into two types: ﬁrstly, non-loaded and loaded transition metal catalysts, and their catalytic properties were summarized and outlined. Then, the interaction of the NH 3 -SCR reaction and chlorobenzene catalytic oxidation (CBCO) on the catalyst surface was discussed in detail. Finally, the causes of catalyst deactivation were analyzed and summarized. Hopefully, this review may provide a reference for the design and commercial application of NO x /CB synergistic removal catalysts.


Introduction
In the process of urbanization, the accumulation of solid waste has posed a serious threat to the ecological environment. The methods to deal with solid waste mainly include sanitary landfill [1], waste incineration [2], and high-temperature composting [3]. Among them, waste incineration technology has become the mainstream direction of municipal solid waste treatment due to its advantages such as obvious volume reduction of solid waste, strong destruction of organic toxicity, and recycling of incineration heat energy [4,5]. However, waste incineration exhaust gas contains secondary pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NO x ), sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen chloride, heavy metals, and dioxins [6,7], and their hazards should not be underestimated. In particular, NO x and dioxin emissions have caused widespread concern. NO x (mainly including NO and NO 2 ) is one of the main causes of acid rain, photochemical smog, ozone depletion, and eutrophication [8][9][10]. Dioxins are a generic term for polychlorinated biphenyldioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated biphenyldioxins and furans (PCDFs). Dioxins are extremely toxic, chemically stable, metabolize extremely slowly after entering the human body, and have been recognized as carcinogens [11,12]. In order to protect the environment and safeguard human health, countries have put forward higher requirements for NO x and dioxin emission standards in the new regulations on exhaust gas emissions. Among them, China has revised the emission standards for tail gas pollutants from waste incineration plants, tightening the dioxin emissions from 1.0 ngTEQ/Nm 3 to 0.1 ngTEQ/Nm 3 and strictly specifying the control standards for NO x [13].
The main methods to control NO x emissions include adsorption [14], ionophore activation [15], selective catalytic reduction (SCR) [16], and selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) [17,18]. Among them, NO x removal by catalytic materials using NH 3 as a reducing agent (NH 3 -SCR) is the most efficient and environmentally friendly and has been widely used industrially [19]. In practical applications, NH 3 -SCR catalysts are classified into three types: low-temperature catalysts, medium-temperature catalysts, and hightemperature catalysts. Their detailed use temperatures and use characteristics are shown in Table 1. Current studies have found that most catalysts followed Eley-Rideal (E-R) and Langmuir-Hinshelwood (L-H) reaction mechanisms in the NH 3 -SCR reaction [20,21]. The E-R mechanism refers to the reaction between the gas phase NO x and the adsorbed state NH 3 ; the L-H mechanism refers to the reaction between the adsorbed state NO x and the adsorbed state NH 3 [22]. The main chemical reactions of the NH 3 -SCR process can be summarized as follows [23,24]: Table 1. Activity characteristics of three types of industrial NH 3 -SCR catalysts.

Catalyst Type Operating Temperature ( • C) Main Features
High-Temperature Catalyst 345-595 High NO x conversion rate; less leakage of NH 3 ; strong resistance to SO 2 poisoning above 425 • C Medium-temperature catalyst 260-425 Wide application and high denitrification efficiency Low-temperature catalyst 150-300 Low operating temperature, low energy consumption Among them, (1) and (2) are the main reactions in NH 3 -SCR. The "fast SCR" is more efficient than the "standard SCR" at 200 • C [25]. The process of NO oxidation to NO 2 is the rate-limiting step of the "fast SCR" [24,26]. The rate of the "NO 2 -SCR" is much lower than that of the "standard SCR". The production of N 2 O in the "NSCR" is the main reason for the reduced selectivity of N 2 . In the SCR process, the strong oxidation of the catalyst at high temperature leads to a direct redox reaction between NH 3 and O 2 , resulting in the inability of NH 3 to react with NO, a reaction process defined as the C-O reaction. In the C-O reaction (7), NH 3 is inactivated by the over-oxidation of O 2 . This is the main reason for the decrease in NO x conversion rates in a high-temperature environment [27]. The effect of the NO to NO 2 ratio and temperature on the NH 3 -SCR process is shown in Figure 1 [24]. When designing catalysts for different temperature conditions, care should be taken to bias the reaction toward fast SCR while avoiding NO 2 -SCR, NSCR, and C-O. Figure 1. Effect of NO to NO2 ratio and temperature on NH3-SCR reaction [24]. Copyri Elsevier B.V.
The degradation pathways of dioxins mainly include microbial degradation photodegradation [30,31], and thermocatalytic degradation [32][33][34]. Thermocatal radation is the conversion of dioxins into harmless products (CO2, CO, and H2O) ily removable products (HCl and Cl2) by using catalysts to accelerate the dechlo and degradation process of dioxins under heating conditions [33]. This technology advantages of lower reaction temperature and higher dioxin removal efficienc considered the best dioxin removal pathway. Dioxins are very difficult to study of their complex structure, huge toxicity, and high price. Chlorobenzene, which toxicity, cheap cost, and a structure similar to that of dioxins, is commonly used i iments to replace dioxins [35]. The first step of CB catalytic oxidation is the adsor CB on the catalyst surface. The second step is dechlorination, in which Cl − is atta nucleophiles and replaced by O2 − . The third step is ring opening, the aromatic rin ated after the dechlorination of chlorobenzene is oxidized by electrophilic sub [36]. The degradation mechanism of CB over Mn0.8Ce0.2O2/H-ZSM5 catalyst is s Figure 2 [37]. CB is adsorbed on the catalyst surface. Then, the C-Cl bond and B acidic site undergo nucleophilic substitution reaction with the neighboring oxide droxyl radicals, during which the C-Cl bond breaks to generate phenol salts and intermediates such as benzoquinone and cyclohexanone are produced. These in ates are converted by O2 nucleophilic attack to maleic acid and aldehydes and are ally deeply oxidized to end products such as CO2, H2O, and HCl. In the catalytic o of chlorobenzene, the redox properties, surface acidity (Brønsted and Lewis ac surface adsorbed oxygen, and mobility of lattice oxygen play important roles in lytic combustion [36,38]. Effect of NO to NO 2 ratio and temperature on NH 3 -SCR reaction [24]. Copyright 2010, Elsevier B.V. The degradation pathways of dioxins mainly include microbial degradation [28,29], photodegradation [30,31], and thermocatalytic degradation [32][33][34]. Thermocatalytic degradation is the conversion of dioxins into harmless products (CO 2 , CO, and H 2 O) and easily removable products (HCl and Cl 2 ) by using catalysts to accelerate the dechlorination and degradation process of dioxins under heating conditions [33]. This technology has the advantages of lower reaction temperature and higher dioxin removal efficiency and is considered the best dioxin removal pathway. Dioxins are very difficult to study because of their complex structure, huge toxicity, and high price. Chlorobenzene, which has low toxicity, cheap cost, and a structure similar to that of dioxins, is commonly used in experiments to replace dioxins [35]. The first step of CB catalytic oxidation is the adsorption of CB on the catalyst surface. The second step is dechlorination, in which Cl − is attacked by nucleophiles and replaced by O 2 − . The third step is ring opening, the aromatic ring generated after the dechlorination of chlorobenzene is oxidized by electrophilic substitution [36]. The degradation mechanism of CB over Mn 0.8 Ce 0.2 O 2 /H-ZSM5 catalyst is shown in Figure 2 [37]. CB is adsorbed on the catalyst surface. Then, the C-Cl bond and Brønsted acidic site undergo nucleophilic substitution reaction with the neighboring oxides or hydroxyl radicals, during which the C-Cl bond breaks to generate phenol salts and, in turn, intermediates such as benzoquinone and cyclohexanone are produced. These intermediates are converted by O 2 nucleophilic attack to maleic acid and aldehydes and are eventually deeply oxidized to end products such as CO 2 , H 2 O, and HCl. In the catalytic oxidation of chlorobenzene, the redox properties, surface acidity (Brønsted and Lewis acid sites), surface adsorbed oxygen, and mobility of lattice oxygen play important roles in CB catalytic combustion [36,38]. Catalysts 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 18 Most of the existing pollutant control technologies focus on stand-alone NOx emission reduction or dioxin degradation. However, setting up single NOx or dioxin removal units is not only space intensive but also economical and energy intensive. The catalytic conversion of both NOx and CB utilizes the redox properties and surface acidity of the catalyst, which provides the feasibility of the combined removal of both. The simultaneous removal of NOx and dioxins in the same facility would have considerably economic and environmental benefits. Therefore, the synergistic removal of NOx and dioxins has become a hot research topic in recent years. However, the activity of conventional SCR catalysts for the catalytic oxidation of CB (a dioxin substitute) is relatively low, and the selectivity of the products CO, CO2, and HCl is even lower than 60%. Therefore, the development of innovative and efficient catalysts is the key to achieving the synergistic removal of NOx and CB. After masses of scientific research, some results have been achieved in improving the performance of catalysts for efficient synergistic removal. Yin et al. [39] integrated FeVO4 and Fe2O3 semiconductor materials into a bifunctional catalyst with stable bifunctional removal of NOx and CB (>95%) and high HCl selectivity (>85%). Yang et al. [40] prepared Nb-doped MnCe0.2Ox composite oxide catalysts, which achieved 94.5% and 96% removal of NOx and CB, respectively, at the temperature of 220 °C. However, there are still some scientific issues in the synergistic removal process that have not yet been concluded: (1) the competitive adsorption of multiple reactants on the catalyst active sites and their effects on the catalytic performance; (2) the interaction of multiple gas components in the synergistic removal reaction; (3) the gradual deposition and coverage effects of carbon and halogen species on the catalyst surface; (4) the effects of other components in the waste incineration exhaust gas (SO2, heavy metals, H2O, HCl, etc.) on the catalyst activity. Based on the above, this paper first summarizes the classification of catalysts used for NOx/CB synergistic removal and analyzes the catalytic properties of each type of catalyst in detail. Then, the mechanism of the interaction between NH3-SCR, and CBCO on the catalyst surface is discussed in detail. Finally, the causes of catalyst deactivation are analyzed and summarized.

Types of Catalysts for NO and CB Co-Removal
As the core of NOx and CB synergistic removal technology, catalysts are used to accelerate the reaction, improve the selectivity of N2 and CO2 in NOx and CB end products, and avoid the occurrence of side reactions. The selection of catalysts is crucial. Specifically, qualified NO and CB synergistic removal catalysts should have the following characteristics: (1) high efficiency of NO and CB removal; (2) strong resistance to poisoning; (3) suitable operating temperature range; and (4) high mechanical strength.
Many catalysts have been shown to be active for SCR reactions and CBCO reactions. The common catalysts mainly include noble metal catalysts (Pt, Pb, Ag, etc.), perovskite catalysts (ABO3 type), and transition metal oxide catalysts (V, Mn, Ce, Co, Fe, Cu, etc.) [38][39][40][41][42]. Although noble metal catalysts have excellent catalytic activity, they cannot be Most of the existing pollutant control technologies focus on stand-alone NO x emission reduction or dioxin degradation. However, setting up single NO x or dioxin removal units is not only space intensive but also economical and energy intensive. The catalytic conversion of both NO x and CB utilizes the redox properties and surface acidity of the catalyst, which provides the feasibility of the combined removal of both. The simultaneous removal of NO x and dioxins in the same facility would have considerably economic and environmental benefits. Therefore, the synergistic removal of NO x and dioxins has become a hot research topic in recent years. However, the activity of conventional SCR catalysts for the catalytic oxidation of CB (a dioxin substitute) is relatively low, and the selectivity of the products CO, CO 2 , and HCl is even lower than 60%. Therefore, the development of innovative and efficient catalysts is the key to achieving the synergistic removal of NO x and CB. After masses of scientific research, some results have been achieved in improving the performance of catalysts for efficient synergistic removal. Yin et al. [39] integrated FeVO 4 and Fe 2 O 3 semiconductor materials into a bifunctional catalyst with stable bifunctional removal of NO x and CB (>95%) and high HCl selectivity (>85%). Yang et al. [40] prepared Nb-doped MnCe 0.2 O x composite oxide catalysts, which achieved 94.5% and 96% removal of NO x and CB, respectively, at the temperature of 220 • C. However, there are still some scientific issues in the synergistic removal process that have not yet been concluded: (1) the competitive adsorption of multiple reactants on the catalyst active sites and their effects on the catalytic performance; (2) the interaction of multiple gas components in the synergistic removal reaction; (3) the gradual deposition and coverage effects of carbon and halogen species on the catalyst surface; (4) the effects of other components in the waste incineration exhaust gas (SO 2 , heavy metals, H 2 O, HCl, etc.) on the catalyst activity. Based on the above, this paper first summarizes the classification of catalysts used for NO x /CB synergistic removal and analyzes the catalytic properties of each type of catalyst in detail. Then, the mechanism of the interaction between NH 3 -SCR, and CBCO on the catalyst surface is discussed in detail. Finally, the causes of catalyst deactivation are analyzed and summarized.

Types of Catalysts for NO and CB Co-Removal
As the core of NO x and CB synergistic removal technology, catalysts are used to accelerate the reaction, improve the selectivity of N 2 and CO 2 in NO x and CB end products, and avoid the occurrence of side reactions. The selection of catalysts is crucial. Specifically, qualified NO and CB synergistic removal catalysts should have the following characteristics: (1) high efficiency of NO and CB removal; (2) strong resistance to poisoning; (3) suitable operating temperature range; and (4) high mechanical strength.
Many catalysts have been shown to be active for SCR reactions and CBCO reactions. The common catalysts mainly include noble metal catalysts (Pt, Pb, Ag, etc.), perovskite catalysts (ABO 3 type), and transition metal oxide catalysts (V, Mn, Ce, Co, Fe, Cu, etc.) [38][39][40][41][42]. Although noble metal catalysts have excellent catalytic activity, they cannot be used in large-scale industrial applications because of their high cost, poor stability, weak resistance to chlorine poisoning, and susceptibility to electrophilic chlorination reactions, which lead to the generation of polychlorine by-products [38,43]. Perovskite catalysts are inexpensive, thermally stable, and have some resistance to poisoning, but they have high activity temperatures and are also susceptible to the generation of polychlorine by-products [41,44]. In contrast, transition metal oxide catalysts are considered ideal for the synergistic catalytic removal of NO x and CB because of their low cost, high catalytic activity, high selectivity, and strong resistance to poisoning. Herein, the catalytic characteristics of the catalysts are summarized by dividing them into two categories: non-loaded transition metal oxide catalysts and loaded transition metal oxide catalysts.

Non-Loaded Transition Metal Oxide Catalysts
Transition metal oxides (e.g., CeO 2 , MnO x , CoO x , VO x , FeO x , and CuO x ) are often used as redox centers for the synergistic NO and CB removal reactions due to the valence difference of the metal ions, which leads to good mobility of electrons and lattice oxygen and can significantly reduce the activation energy of the reaction. Further, the metal ions of the catalyst can act as Lewis acid sites, which play an important role in NH 3 and CB adsorption, facilitating the reaction [45]. Moreover, the catalytic performance of single metal oxide catalysts is not satisfactory because of their small specific surface area, poor thermal stability, and their inherent tendency to chlorinate and generate volatile products; therefore, they are less used [46][47][48][49]. The addition of dopants to form multi-metal composite oxide catalysts is a common method to improve the defects of single metal oxides. The synergistic removal of NO x and CB using one catalyst was achieved by rational adjustment of catalyst components. Table 2 shows some non-loaded transition metal oxide catalysts and their synergistic removal efficiencies for NO and CB.
CeO 2 catalysts have received wide attention because of their high oxygen storage capacity and oxygen mobility due to their surface oxygen vacancies and valence transitions between Ce 4+ and Ce 3+ , such as superoxide species (O 2 -) and peroxide species (O 2 2-), which show good activity in catalytic reactions [50]. However, pure CeO 2 has low resistance to chlorine, poor thermal stability, easy sintering at high temperatures, and reduced oxygen storage capacity, leading to a decrease in catalytic activity [51]. Doping with other transition metals, such as Mn [52], Nb [53], and Zr [54] can effectively increase the rate of Cl removal from the surface of the CeO 2 catalyst while decreasing the energy required for oxygen vacancy generation, improving catalytic activity and stability. Wang et al. [52] showed that the efficiency of MnO x -CeO 2 composite oxide catalysts for CB removal was much higher than that of CeO 2 and MnO x single-component catalysts due to the higher mobility of lattice oxygen and surface oxygen of MnO x -CeO 2 , and the large amount of surface active oxygen can effectively remove the Cl components generated at the surface during the catalytic reaction, thus maintaining the high catalytic efficiency of the catalyst. Gan et al. [55] prepared a series of MnO x -CeO 2 catalysts with different ratios of metals by a coprecipitation method for the synergistic removal of NO and CB. According to the findings, MnO x and CeO 2 formed Mn y Ce 1-y O 2-δ solid solution. When the Mn content was 40%, the redox performance of the catalysts was well balanced with the surface acidity, resulting in catalysts having excellent activity in the reduction of NO and catalytic oxidation of CB in the range of 200-300 • C. In addition, to further improve the performance of the synergistic catalytic removal of NO x and CB at low temperatures, Yang et al. [40] prepared Nb-doped MnCe 0.2 O x composite oxide catalysts by the homogeneous precipitation method. The results showed that the introduction of Nb increased the average pore size, pore volume, and specific surface area of MnCe 0.2 O x ; enhanced the stability of the catalyst structure; and significantly promoted the growth of Lewis acid amount at 220 • C. The removal rates of NO x and CB reached 94.5% and 96%, respectively, with excellent sulfur resistance and water resistance.
Fe is widely available, reasonably priced, and stable. However, the single component FeO x has low activity in the synergistic removal of NO x and CB, and the catalytic activity can be substantially improved by doping the composite. Yin et al. [39] integrated FeVO 4 and Fe 2 O 3 semiconductor materials into a bifunctional catalyst and balanced the redox properties and surface acidity of the catalyst by interfacial charge modulation to ensure excellent NO x and CB synergistic removal performance. The optimized FeVO 4 -Fe 2 O 3 catalyst showed stable bifunctional removal of NO x and CB (>95%) and high HCl selectivity (>85%) over the state-of-the-art V 2 O 5 -WO 3 /TiO 2 catalyst. This provides an effective strategy for the design of advanced catalysts for multi-pollutant control.
The activity of the catalyst is influenced by the valence of the doped metal. Doping with different metal elements can regulate the amount of Bronsted and Lewis acids on the catalyst. Brønsted acid can provide protons that facilitate the breaking of C-Cl bonds and promote the production of HCl [56]. The strength of Lewis acid determines the redox performance of the catalyst and promotes the deep oxidation of intermediates, thus enhancing CO 2 selectivity [57]. Wei et al. [58] doped CeO 2 with low-valence Al 3+ and high-valence Ta 5+ , respectively. It was found that the introduction of low-valence Al 3+ increased the number of Lewis acid sites in the catalyst and facilitated the formation of lattice oxygen, thus achieving excellent performance in the synergistic removal of NO and CB through characterization and simulation. In contrast, the introduction of the higher valence state Ta 5+ brought the opposite effect. Ta 5+ provided more electrons to the ligand oxygen than Ce 4+ , which hindered the detachment of lattice oxygen from the catalyst surface and weakened the oxidation ability of the catalyst, and thus performed poorly in NH 3 -SCR and CBCO.

Loaded Transition Metal Oxide Catalysts
Loaded transition metal oxide catalysts usually contain one or more transition metal oxides as active components, which are uniformly distributed on carriers such as TiO 2 , SiO 2 , CeO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , and molecular sieves. Generally, the carrier materials have high specific surface area and good thermal stability, which help to improve the activity and durability of the catalyst. The catalyst surface structure is determined by the nature of the active component and the carrier itself, and the high dispersion of the active component on the carrier surface contributes to the improvement of catalytic activity. In addition, the success of catalytic removal of multi-pollutants relies heavily on the adsorption capacity of the multiphase interface for the target pollutants [61], and weakly acidic metal oxides such as TiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 as carriers can provide abundant surface acid sites, which play an important role in NH 3 and CB adsorption. At the same time, the synergistic effect between the active component and the carrier is also beneficial for enhancing the reactivity of the catalyst. The efficiencies of some loaded transition metal oxide catalysts for the synergistic removal of NO and CB are listed in Table 3.
The charge transfer between the active component oxide and the reduced carrier (e.g., TiO 2 , CeO 2 ) is advantageous for increasing the catalyst activity. However, in practical studies, pure CeO 2 is seldom used as a catalyst carrier for the synergistic removal of pollutants such as NO x and CB, because CeO 2 easily reacts with Cl, leading to a decrease in catalytic activity. Martín et al. [62] prepared two oxide catalysts, MnO x and CeO x , for the synergistic removal of NO and 1,2-dichlorobenzene (o-DCB) by co-precipitation and impregnation methods, respectively. It was found that compared with MnO x /CeO 2 prepared by the impregnation method, the catalyst prepared by co-precipitation has better activity because of the MnO x -CeO 2 solid solution, which improved redox, acidity, and resistance to chlorine. Furthermore, Bertinchamps et al. [63] demonstrated experimentally that most of the active metal oxides can be well dispersed on the TiO 2 surface, while the dispersion on the SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 surfaces is relatively poor. Therefore, the catalysts with TiO 2 as the carrier tend to show better catalytic activity. VO x -based catalysts with TiO 2 as a carrier are mainly used as commercial SCR catalysts with high deNO x activity and anti-poisoning properties [64]. In recent years, it has been found that VO x /TiO 2 catalysts also have good stability and catalytic activity in the catalytic oxidation of chlorinated aromatic pollutants such as CB. For the synergistic removal of pollutants such as NO x and CB, the structure of surface VO x plays an important role. It is generally believed that monomeric vanadium species are more effective for the oxidation of CB, o-DCB, etc., while polymerized vanadium species are more advantageous for the catalytic reduction of NO [65,66]. Zhai et al. [67] further investigated the reaction properties of VO x /TiO 2 for the catalytic removal of NO x and CB using a combination of DFT calculations and experimental investigations. It was found that the main adsorption site of CB on monomeric vanadium species was the V-OH bond, and the main adsorption site on the polymerized vanadium species was the V-O bond. The monomeric vanadium species facilitated the conversion of Lewis V-O to Brønsted V-OH, thus providing sufficient H protons for HCl formation, while the polymerized vanadium species could effectively retain the redox cycle of V 4+ /V 5+ , yielding superior activity in the CBCO and SCR reactions. In addition, the loading of VO x on TiO 2 carriers has a very important effect on catalyst activity and selectivity, with the first growth followed by a decrease in pollutant conversion with increasing VO x loading [68].
Additives such as WO x and MoO x are commonly added to VO x /TiO 2 catalysts to provide additional surface acid centers and to prevent the transformation or sintering of the TiO 2 carrier from the anatase to rutile phase. They can significantly improve the catalytic performance and stability of catalysts, influence the surface acidity and VO x dispersion of catalysts, and broaden the active temperature range [69,70]. As MoO 3 has better reduction and higher Brønsted acid center strength than WO 3 , Mo-V/Ti exhibited higher SCR and CB oxidation activity than Mo-W-V/Ti and W-V/Ti catalysts, achieving 100% NO conversion and more than 95% CB conversion at 300-400 • C [49]. Yu et al. [46] used Al 2 O 3 and SiO 2 to further dope the Mo-V/Ti catalysts and investigated the effect of doping on the simultaneous removal of NO x and CB. Compared with SiO 2 , the doping of Al 2 O 3 broadened the active temperature window and provided more surface acidity, reaching 100% NO conversion at 250-400 • C and nearly 10% higher CB conversion of Al-VMo/Ti than VMo/Ti in the range of 300-350 • C. In addition, Al-VMo/Ti had a stronger tolerance to SO 2 while reducing the amount of polychlorinated by-products.
In addition to VO x -based catalysts, other metal oxide catalysts (e.g., MnO x , FeO x ) with TiO 2 as the carrier also have more outstanding catalytic activity in the removal of chlorinated aromatic pollutants such as CB. Li et al. [71] prepared a series of MnO x /TiO 2 and MnO x -SnO x /TiO 2 catalysts by the co-precipitation method and investigated their CBCO performance, which showed that they had excellent performance in the low-temperature range. The introduction of Sn inhibited the formation of chlorine-containing oxides of Mn elements and suppressed the volatilization loss of the core active components, thus significantly improving the stability of the MnO x /TiO 2 catalysts. The catalytic efficiency of MnO x -SnO x /TiO 2 for CB remained above 97% after 100 h of continuous reaction at 225 • C. Khaleel et al. [72] prepared Fe 2 O 3 /TiO 2 by the impregnation method, which can achieve complete conversion of CB at 400 • C. The doping of Ca can lead to the reduction in pore size, increase in specific surface area, and grain size reduction of Fe 2 O 3 /TiO 2 catalysts, which is beneficial for the catalyst activity [73]. However, these metal oxide catalysts are yet to be investigated for the synergistic removal of NO x and CB.
The main disadvantages of TiO 2 compared with other carriers (e.g., Al 2 O 3 and SiO 2 ) are its high cost, small specific surface area, and poor thermal stability. In contrast, composite carriers can combine the advantages of different carriers. For example, TiO 2 -Al 2 O 3 and TiO 2 -SiO 2 composite carriers can combine the advantages of Al 2 O 3 and SiO 2 in terms of large specific surface area, inhibit the clustering of surface active components, slow down the deactivation of catalysts, and significantly enhance the redox ability of catalysts [74,75]. In addition, multiphase carrier-loaded multi-metal oxide catalysts have been used for the synergistic removal of NO x and CB. Jin et al. [48] designed a series of W-Zr-O x /Ti-Ce-Mn-O x (WZ/TCM) catalysts for the synergistic removal of NO x and CB. Among them, the active component W-Zr-O x mainly provided solid super acids; CeO 2 and MnO 2 enhanced the redox performance; and TiO 2 had a large specific surface area. These factors ensured the excellent performance of the WZ/TCM catalyst. At 350-500 • C, the NO conversion of WZ/TCM reached 100% and the oxidation activity of CB was higher than 85%, with high N 2 selectivity and excellent sulfur and water resistance. Similarly, Jin et al. [76] prepared WCeMnO x /TiO 2 -ZrO 2 catalysts to study their catalytic performance for the synergistic catalytic removal of NO, Hg 0 and synergistic catalytic removal of NO and CB. The catalyst performance was improved by solid phase structure control. MnWO 4 improved the solid acidity of the catalyst and enhanced the catalytic activity at high temperatures; the formation of Ce 0.75 Zr 0.25 O 2 , Ce 2 WO 6 , Ce 2 Zr 2 O 7 , and Ce 2 Ti 2 O 7 improved the low-temperature catalytic activity.
In addition to the commonly used TiO 2 carriers, molecular sieve carriers usually have a large specific surface area, good stability, sufficient surface acidity, special morphology, and unique advantages in terms of adsorption of reactants and reaction diversity [77]. In the removal of chlorinated aromatic pollutants such as CB, the appropriate acidity facilitates the conversion of Cl species to inorganic chlorine species and to some extent avoids the production of polychlorinated organics [78]. Gallastegi-Villa et al. [79] prepared metal-loaded ZSM-5 catalysts with Cu, Fe, Mn, and V and investigated their ability to synergistically catalyze the removal of NO and o-DCB. The highest catalytic activity of Cu/ZSM-5 was observed based on the TOF value (number of reactant molecules converted per unit time per unit catalytic active site) of o-DCB oxidation at 150 • C and the stability test results of NO conversion at 300 • C. However, it is still difficult to apply practically due to the presence of more polychlorinated by-products.

Mechanism of Synergistic Multi-Reactant Removal Interaction
In the synergistic NO x /CB removal process, NH 3 -SCR and CBCO inevitably interact with each other. However, the interaction between multiple reactants is not single facilitation or inhibition but depends on various factors such as reaction temperature, reactant concentration, and catalyst properties (surface acidity, redox properties, adsorption properties). The interaction between multiple reactants is complex, and an in-depth understanding of the interaction mechanism of multiple reactants and the influence of reaction conditions on the synergistic removal efficiency can help guide the design and preparation of NO and CB synergistic removal catalysts.

Effect of NH 3 -SCR on CBCO
Aniline, nitrobenzene, and benzonitrile were detected in the by-products of NO x /CB co-removal, indicating that a portion of NH 3 -SCR reactants was involved in CB oxidation [82,84,85]. It is of great practical importance to clarify the effect of NH 3 -SCR reactants on CB oxidation efficiency and to investigate in-depth the mechanism of NH 3 -SCR effect on CB oxidation to improve the removal rate of CB in the combined removal process. V 2 O 5 -MoO 3 /TiO 2 is currently the best medium-and high-temperature SCR catalyst for NO removal efficiency [23]; so, many NO x /CB synergistic removal studies have been carried out based on V 2 O 5 -MoO 3 /TiO 2 catalysts. However, there is no uniform knowledge of whether there is synergy between NH 3 -SCR and CBCO on V 2 O 5 -MoO 3 /TiO 2 catalysts. Some researchers have found the existence of synergistic NH 3 -SCR and CBCO removal over V-M-T catalysts. NH 3 -SCR promotes CB-catalyzed oxidation because NO and NO 2 act as oxidants to accelerate the oxidation cycle of VO x species. NO is oxidized to NO 2 at WO x or MoO x active sites on V 2 O 5 -WO 3 (MoO 3 )/TiO 2 . NO 2 oxidation performance is greater than oxygen, which accelerates the conversion of V 4+ to V 5+ . V 5+ is the active substance for CB oxidation; so, the increase in V 5+ accelerates CB conversion and improves CB conversion [86,87]. However, by comparing the CB removal process alone on V-M-T catalyst with the CB removal process in NO x /CB synergy, some researchers have found that there is a certain inhibition of CB oxidation by NH 3 -SCR; this is caused by the competitive adsorption between NH 3 , NO, and CB [80,82]. To better demonstrate the inhibitory effect of NH 3 and NO on CB adsorption, Gan et al. performed a series of TPD experiments (Figure 3) [88]. When NO, NH 3 , and CB were present as a single gas, their adsorption capacities were 238 µmol g −1 , 145 µmol g −1 , and 43 µmol g −1 , respectively, indicating that all three reactants could be adsorbed on the catalyst. The adsorption capacity of CB pretreated with NO+NH 3 decreased to 3.7 µmol g −1 , indicating a significant inhibitory effect of NO+NH 3 on CB adsorption. CB was mainly adsorbed on the Brønsted acidic site of the catalyst and completed the dechlorination process. The introduction of NH 3 and NO occupied the acid site on the catalyst surface, leading to a shift in the conversion temperature of CB toward higher temperatures [82,86]. To further clarify the effect of NH 3 and NO on CB oxidation, Gao et al. investigated in detail the effect of NH 3 and NO on CB in an aerobic environment [89]. On V 2 O 5 -MoO 3 /TiO 2 catalysts, NH 3 binded significantly stronger to the catalyst than CB, the adsorption of CB decreased significantly when NH 3 was present, and the CB conversion efficiency decreased. NO has little effect on the adsorption of CB. NO readily combines with O 2 to form NO 2 gas, which is more oxidizing than O 2 and contributes to CB oxidation. When NH 3 , NO, and CB were added to the reaction simultaneously, the CB oxidation was promoted by NH 3 -SCR on V 2 O 5 -MoO 3 /TiO 2 catalyst. On the Mn-Ce catalyst, the same promotion of CB oxidation by SCR was observed in the low-temperature section (below 200 • C) [90].   There are obvious effects of gas components, intermediates, and reaction temperature on the oxidation of CB during the synergistic removal process. Li et al. prepared PdV/TiO 2 and studied its synergistic NO and CB removal mechanism (Figure 4) [83]. In the range of 300~400 • C, the catalytic removal efficiency of CB under different atmospheres was in the order of CBCO + NO 2 > CBCO > CBCO + NO > CBCO + NH 3 > CBCO + SCR. The O vacancies generated during the ring opening of CB facilitated the adsorption of the reacting gas molecules and accelerated the CBCO + SCR reaction. The O vacancy structure on the catalyst surface is restored by NO 2 and O 2 reoxidation, and the presence of NO 2 molecules facilitates the CBCO reaction. More in-depth studies have shown that the promotion and inhibition of NO 2 on catalytic combustion of VOCs is related to its presence morphology. In the synergistic removal of NO and toluene, the effect of NO/NO 2 /N 2 O/O 2 content on the oxidation of toluene at 150 • C is shown in Figure 5. NO 2 cannot promote the oxidation of toluene when the NO 2 concentration is lower than 400 ppm; however, NO 2 has a promoting effect on the oxidation of toluene when the NO 2 content is higher than 400 ppm. This is because NO 2 forms nitrate species (NO 3 −) and nitrite species (NO 2 −) on the catalyst surface. Nitrate species (NO 3 −) are inert on the catalyst surface, do not have oxidation properties, and even cover the active site to affect the catalyst activity. As the concentration of NO 2 increases, nitrate production reaches equilibrium and NO 2 exists in adsorbed form. NO 2 in the adsorbed state has stronger oxidation properties than oxygen, thus promoting CB oxidation [85].

Effect of CBCO on NH3-SCR
Normally, the NO conversion efficiency in NH3-SCR increases with the increase in temperature and remains stable in a certain temperature range when the NO conversion reaches its maximum; then, the NO conversion decreases as the C-O reaction occurs with the increase in temperature. The conversion efficiency of CB usually increases with the increase in temperature, reaches its maximum, and remains after reaching a certain temperature. In the NOx/CB synergistic removal reaction, the initial temperature at which NO

Effect of CBCO on NH 3 -SCR
Normally, the NO conversion efficiency in NH 3 -SCR increases with the increase in temperature and remains stable in a certain temperature range when the NO conversion reaches its maximum; then, the NO conversion decreases as the C-O reaction occurs with the increase in temperature. The conversion efficiency of CB usually increases with the increase in temperature, reaches its maximum, and remains after reaching a certain temperature. In the NO x /CB synergistic removal reaction, the initial temperature at which NO conversion occurs is usually lower than that of CB. Here, the effect of CB on NH 3 -SCR is discussed in two parts: the low-temperature section (where CB is not oxidized) and the high-temperature section (where CB undergoes catalytic oxidation).
In the low-temperature section, CB is not decomposed and affects NH 3 -SCR mainly by occupying the acidic sites with NO and NH 3 . On most catalysts, the E-R mechanism coexists with the L-H mechanism during NO conversion; so, NO can participate in the reaction in the gaseous state without pre-sorption on the catalyst. Therefore, the inhibition of NO adsorption by CB at low temperature has a negligible effect on NH 3 -SCR. A series of temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) experiments showed a small decrease in NH 3 and NO adsorption after the adsorption of CB, and NH 3 adsorption was significantly higher than that of NO ( Figure 4) [90]. In the NH 3 -SCR reaction, NH 3 adsorbed at the L-acid site participates in the SCR reaction, while NH 3 adsorbed at the B-acid site is used as a supplement to the depletion of NH 3 at the L-acid site [88]. Thus, although CB leads to a decrease in NH 3 adsorption, the inhibitory effect on NO conversion is not significant.
In the high-temperature section, CB is catalytically converted to produce large amounts of CO 2 , HCl, Cl 2 , and some intermediate products (polychlorinated compounds). The C-Cl bond is broken during CB oxidation. The produced free Cl-ions combine with the metal in the catalyst forming metal chlorides to activate neighboring bridging hydroxyl groups, providing additional B-acid sites, allowing for increased NH 3 adsorption, avoiding excessive oxidation of NH 3 , and inhibiting the C-O oxidation reactions [88,89]. With the rise in NH 3 adsorption, the inactive NH 4 Cl forms and occupies the catalyst's active site, regulating the redox performance of the catalyst and making the conversion efficiency of NO at higher temperatures. In the high-temperature section, CB can improve NO conversion efficiency and N 2 selectivity and broaden the SCR temperature window [48,88].

Catalyst Deactivation
Catalysts gradually decrease in catalytic activity and selectivity to deactivation during long-term use. Therefore, it is necessary to study the catalyst deactivation process and extend the catalyst life.
Chlorine poisoning and coking are the main causes of catalyst deactivation. The Clgenerated by CB through nucleophilic or electrophilic substitution occupies the active site in the form of direct adsorption on the catalyst surface or occupying oxygen vacancies to form metal chlorides and metal chloride oxides. The generated NH 4 Cl is deposited on the catalyst surface leading to catalyst deactivation. In the NO x /CB synergistic removal process, the generation of by-products is another important factor in catalyst deactivation. The migration and transformation of carbon and chlorine during CB oxidation follow a dynamic equilibrium. Most of them are eventually converted into inorganic products CO x and HCl or even Cl 2 , some of which are present in the flue gas as organic matter and the rest accumulate on the catalyst surface as surface precipitates. CCl 4 and C 2 Cl 4 are the main accumulators on the catalyst. They are the main by-products leading to catalyst deactivation [68].
The actual plant exhaust gas components are complex and contain various components such as SO 2 , H 2 O, HCl, and heavy metals. Among them, the reaction of SO 2 with NH 3 and H 2 O result in the formation of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 and NH 4 HSO 4 , which deposit on the catalyst surface and result in catalyst deactivation [91]. In addition, SO 2 can react with the catalyst's active component to form sulfides or sulfates that destroy or block the active sites on the catalyst surface. PdSO 4 and NH 4 HSO 4 species are deposited on the catalyst surface and occupy the catalyst active center, resulting in a blocked reaction on the catalyst surface and a decrease in catalytic efficiency. In general, sulfate poisoning such as (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 and NH 4 HSO 4 is reversible. The generated sulfates (mainly NH 4 HSO 4 ) are partially decomposed at 400 • C; then, the catalyst activity is recovered. In contrast, the deactivation caused by the formation of sulfate species from the catalyst active component with SO 2 is irreversible [92]. H 2 O exerts an inhibitory effect on catalytic activity and this inhibition is generally reversible [93]. This inhibition is mainly caused by the competition of H 2 O with the adsorption of the reactant gas on the surface of the active site. The degree of inhibition is influenced by the catalyst type, reaction temperature, and H 2 O concentration, with higher H 2 O concentrations showing more significant inhibition. In addition, H 2 O is a necessary reactant for the formation of ammonium sulfate from NH 3 and SO x ; so, the presence of H 2 O aggravates the inhibitory effect of SO 2 on the catalyst activity. The inhibitory effect of HCl on the NH 3 -SCR reaction in low-temperature environments (below 250 • C) is evident [48]. This is attributed to the following two points: (1) the presence of HCl severely inhibits NH 3 adsorption; (2) NH 4 Cl generated from HCl and NH 3 is deposited on the catalyst surface and covers the active site. Heavy metals in the flue gas also have a significant effect on the catalytic performance of the catalyst. As 2 O 3 species can significantly reduce the formation energy of oxygen vacancies at the V-O-V sites on V 2 O 5 -WO 3 / TiO 2 catalysts, which leads to the formation of more toxic polychlorinated by-products [81].

Conclusions
Both NH 3 -SCR and CBCO utilize the surface acidity and redox properties of the catalyst, which provides a theoretical basis for the synergistic removal of NO x and CB. Balancing the surface acidity and redox properties of catalysts at a certain temperature is the key to the efficient removal of NO x and CB. In this paper, the catalysts commonly used for the synergistic NO x /CB removal are divided into two types: unloaded transition metal catalysts and loaded transition metal catalysts. Their catalytic properties are summarized and outlined, among which the unloaded transition metal catalysts are promising for their excellent catalytic performance. The inevitable interaction between NH 3 -SCR and CBCO in the synergistic NO x /CB removal is discussed.

1.
Effect of NH 3 -SCR on CBCO. NH 3 competes with CB for adsorption, and NH 3 has significantly stronger adsorption performance than CB, resulting in lower CBCO low-temperature activity. NO 2 is produced in the NH 3 -SCR process. NO 2 has a stronger oxidation performance than O 2 and can promote CB conversion. However, this promotion effect is related to the morphology of NO 2 , which can improve the CB conversion efficiency and reduce the CB ignition point when NO 2 is present in the adsorbed form in the reaction system.

2.
Effect of CB on NH 3 -SCR. The effect of CB on the amount of NH 3 adsorbed was not significant; so, there was no significant inhibition of the NH 3 -SCR reaction by CB at low temperatures. The decomposition of CB at high-temperature and the generated Clprovided additional acid sites to increase the NH 3 adsorption and improve the NO conversion efficiency. The generated Clreacts with NH 3 to form inert NH 4 Cl, which regulates the redox performance of the catalyst, effectively inhibits the C-O reaction, and widens the SCR temperature window.
Catalyst deactivation is a difficult problem encountered in practical industrial applications. The cause of catalyst deactivation is the accumulation of carbon and chlorine species on the catalyst surface. The presence of SO 2 , H 2 O, HCl, and heavy metals in complex flue gases leads to catalyst deactivation to different degrees. Rational design of catalysts; balancing the acidic and redox properties on the catalyst surface in a certain temperature interval; and improving N 2 , CO 2 selectivity, catalyst thermal stability, and resistance to poisoning are still bottlenecks that need to be broken in the future.

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.